Ethical egoism is a form of..benefit-harm theory. divine Command theory.. psychological egoism. subjectivism Solution Ans:Ethical egoism is the idea that people have moral obligations only to themselves and that they ought to pursue their own ends exclusively. An ethical egoist would say that one has no duty to help others in need unless doing so happens to coincide with one\'s own needs. Because ethical egoism prescribes actions, it is distinct from psychological egoism (discussed in the previous selection by Joel Feinberg), which is a descriptive claim about the nature of people\'s motivations.Rachels provides several arguments both for and against ethical egoism. The first argument for ethical egoism is that we actually harm other people by looking out for their interests. For example, we may misinterpret their interests and bungle attempts at help, or we may intrude on other people\'s lives in ways that they dislike, or we may degrade others by offering them handouts. But this justification of egoism is premised upon the value of the general welfare precisely the thing that ethical egoism denies is important. Rather than claiming that only one\'s own interests matter, this argument states that paying attention to one\'s own interests is the most effective means to furthering the interests of everyone. It is thus an empirical claim about the best way to benefit people generally, not a normative claim about whose interests ought to count. A second argument for ethical egoism is that altruistic ethics (i.e., those that require one to help others even without benefit to oneself) requires one to sacrifice oneself for the benefit of others, and that were one to follow altruistic ethics one would have nothing to give one\'s projects, goals, and relationships. But those things are precisely what make life valuable; thus, altruistic ethics denies the importance of the very things that are valuable. Rachels dismisses this argument quickly because it is a false dichotomy; having obligations to others does not entail that one give up all of one\'s projects. So,Option A is correct..

1. Ethical egoism is a form of..benefit-harm theory. divine Command theory.. psychological
egoism. subjectivism
Solution
Ans:Ethical egoism is the idea that people have moral obligations only to themselves and that
they ought to pursue their own ends exclusively. An ethical egoist would say that one has no
duty to help others in need unless doing so happens to coincide with one's own needs. Because
ethical egoism prescribes actions, it is distinct from psychological egoism (discussed in the
previous selection by Joel Feinberg), which is a descriptive claim about the nature of people's
motivations.Rachels provides several arguments both for and against ethical egoism. The first
argument for ethical egoism is that we actually harm other people by looking out for their
interests. For example, we may misinterpret their interests and bungle attempts at help, or we
may intrude on other people's lives in ways that they dislike, or we may degrade others by
offering them handouts. But this justification of egoism is premised upon the value of the general
welfare precisely the thing that ethical egoism denies is important. Rather than claiming that only
one's own interests matter, this argument states that paying attention to one's own interests is
the most effective means to furthering the interests of everyone. It is thus an empirical claim
about the best way to benefit people generally, not a normative claim about whose interests
ought to count. A second argument for ethical egoism is that altruistic ethics (i.e., those that
require one to help others even without benefit to oneself) requires one to sacrifice oneself for
the benefit of others, and that were one to follow altruistic ethics one would have nothing to give
one's projects, goals, and relationships. But those things are precisely what make life valuable;
thus, altruistic ethics denies the importance of the very things that are valuable. Rachels
dismisses this argument quickly because it is a false dichotomy; having obligations to others
does not entail that one give up all of one's projects.
So,Option A is correct.