Memo Program Evaluation Of Internal Auditing System

Memo Program Evaluation Of Internal Auditing System
Project : Memo program evaluation of internal auditing system in Pharmaceutical industry Goal: the main objectives of this memo is to discuss the
purpose, finding the targeted clients, and how the internal auditing system in Pharmaceutical industry works. The revise and improve your evaluation
questions from earlier making sure to focus strongly on the measurement of outcomes. You should clearly identify outcomes and indicators of success
for each evaluation question dealing with these outcome measures. Include a table showing what data will be necessary, how it will be collected, and
how it will be used to answer each of your evaluation questions The main objectives of this memo is to discuss the purpose, finding the targeted clients,
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The following key elements provide strong rationale for conducting internal audits: Results as part of the process performance and product quality
monitoring system Implement corrective actions and preventive actions (CAPA) as a result of audit observations Include audit results as part of
management review of the quality system Consider feedback from periodic internal audits and external audits in continuous improvement decisions.
Consulting people is not a new idea. What is new is the growing prominence and frequency of consultation activities, particularly those involving large
numbers of participants. As the prominence of consultation increases, it is sometimes unclear precisely how client consultation helps managers make
better decisions. Managers need to know that, and how to design the consultation process accordingly. Client consultation is linked to the measurement
of client satisfaction. You must identify the gaps between what clients expect or need from the organization and the service they feel they are actually
receiving. Definition In the context of delivering quality services, consultation is a process that permits and promotes the two–way flow of information
between clients of government services and the government. Goal and Objectives The goal of client consultation is to discover your clients ' opinion
of the services they receive from your department and the way these services
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Four Levels Of Training Evaluation Is Defined As A...
Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of training evaluation is defined as a technique for evaluating training programs, created by Donald Kirkpatrick in 1959. The
Kirkpatrick model is the worldwide standard for evaluating the effectiveness of training. The four levels of this technique incorporate assurance of how
learners respond to the learning procedure, the achievement of skill acquisition by learners, the degree to which workplace behavior after the training
demonstrates skill acquisition, and quantifiable outcomes, including expanded profits or decreasing any defects observed. Donald Kirkpatrick, Professor
Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin and past president of the American Society for Training and Development (ASTD), initially... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This evaluation technique is defined as a detailed study of a market or geographical area to gather data on the attitudes, impressions, opinions,
satisfaction level and etc. by targeting and polling a section of the people. Surveys are low cost and also very effective as long as the participant is
unbiased. Surveys can be administered to the participants through a various number of ways. The questionnaires can be simple and sent by email or
through the Internet, which is easily accessible. Online surveys have quickly become a popular way of gathering data and conducing surveys. It is
also extremely convenient and does not take up much time. The surveys should have only relevant questions that reflect the training that was just
conducted. It should also be conducted right after the training when the trainees are still sure about what they have experienced. If the survey is
handed to them too late, the data collected could differ. Simple questions should be asked with a "yes or no" option as well as a 1 to 10 rating scale.
At the end of the survey, there should be an open–ended box where the trainees are able to freely write how they feel about the training as well as what
can be improved.
Learning
This is when the organization measures what the trainees have learned and how much has their knowledge has expanded as an outcome of the training.
At the start of the training session, there should be a specific list of learning objectives. These points should be

Evaluation Of A Student Program Evaluation Reports And...
The assignment is for the student to search program evaluation reports and complete the criteria that were provided by the instructor, such as identify
the evaluation it illustrates, and identify the methodological strengths, and weaknesses. The article, "D.C. Department of Mental Health School Mental
Health Program SY 07–08 Report", discussed the limitations and barriers of learning opportunities provided to many helping professionals within the
school districts, youths, and the parents. This program offers services that are individualized to the schools and provide adequate services that are
evidence–based treatments. This program was implemented in multiple school districts to help the students and make the schools a safer environment.
Therefore, the article evaluate the effectiveness of the evidenced–based services that was provided to the students. The outcome of the services that
were most utilized are Good Touch Bad Touch, Connect With Kids, and Botvin's Lifeskills were the most effective programs for the students. The
Satisfaction Surveys were distributed among children and youth receiving services; however, there were limitations that affected the results. Also, the
parents, teachers, and school staff completed the satisfaction survey to obtain their viewpoint on their satisfaction of the clinicians. The children,
youths, and the parents filled out the survey on their positive experiences that they had with the clinician. The teacher and staff filled out their
satisfaction survey that pertained to the effectiveness of the clinician when working with the students at the end of the year. At the end of the year, the
surveys were distributed to the school administrators to be completed and returned to the School Mental Health Program. In addition, there were
assessments that the principal had to rate their perceptions on the school atmosphere. Also, the School Mental Health Program clinicians provided
workshops that were affiliated with the school. At the workshops, the clinicians distributed satisfaction forms that were provided to the respondents and
collected by the clinicians. First, evaluation illustrates is the satisfaction of the participants that received

Evaluation Of A Program Evaluation
According to Mertens and Wilson, program evaluation is a systematic method for collecting, analyzing, and using information to answer questions
about projects, policies and programs, particularly about their effectiveness and efficiency. Stakeholders often want to know whether the programs they
are funding and supporting are effective. While program evaluation first focuses on the effectiveness of the program, other important factors to take
into consideration is cost of the program, improvements that could be made, outcomes of the program, and usefulness of the program. Evaluators help
to answer these questions, and stakeholders have to work with the evaluators in order to come to the best conclusion about the effectiveness of a
program so that all aspects are taken into consideration. Program evaluations can involve both quantitative and qualitative methods of research. People
who do program evaluation come from many different backgrounds, such as sociology, psychology, economics, social work, and public policy. Some
graduate schools also have specific training programs for program evaluation. Rossi, Lipsey and Freeman suggest the following kinds of assessment,
which may be appropriate at these different stages: assessment of the need for the program, assessment of program design and logic/theory, assessment
of how the program is being implemented, assessment of the program 's outcome or impact, assessment of the program 's cost and efficiency, and
assessing needs.

Evaluation Of A Therapy Program For Adults 21 Years And...
Two Specific Programs
Sensory Program
A therapy program targeted to adults 21 years and older, the Sensory Program focuses on sensory integration, rehabilitation, and quality of life (Aptus
Treatment Centre, 2016). Sensory integration is the process of absorbing sensory information followed by organizing and assigning meaning to said
information, and thus, making it worthwhile (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). To respond appropriately and effectively to givensensory input and/or a
situation, one experience appropriate sensory integration (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). The cliental of Aptus impairments in the way they integrate,
process, and organize sensory information, resulting in feelings of confusion, stress and anxiety, frustration and fear (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016).
Thus, the goal of the sensory program is to reduce feels of anxiety, develop coping strategies, and offer opportunities in which to learn self–regulation
and self–expression (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). As such clients participate in activities such as a period within the "Snoezelen Room," "relaxation
time" and "music" (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). The "Snoezelen Room" is an artificially designed space that offers a relaxing environment through
soothing lighting, music, gentle vibrations, and tactile sensations (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016).
Areas of Strength
Certain staff members of the Sensory Program continuously exude a love for their job, working with those with developmental

A Program Evaluation is an important factor in determining if an agency is producing successful results. Usually a program evaluation is requested or
brought forth by a specific concern that is in need of being addressed. This type of practice–based research method provides agencies with
accountability. Sometimes a program evaluation is needed in order for some agencies to continue to receive funding to keep their programs, to meet
accreditation standards, and to ensure clients are being helped by the programs (Royse, 2011). Before performing a program evaluation, it is
important to consider many factors such as time, resources, audience, and purpose. A time limit for an agency evaluation could change the direction
the evaluation goes. Resources are definitely an important aspect of the evaluation. A lack of resources could result in a simpler process whether
than a copyrighted tool for an evaluation. The type of audience and purpose will in turn decide which type of method is to be implemented. The
written report should be prepared for the type of audience that will be examining it. Each audience will require their unique writing style (Royse,
2011). For example, if the audience is a group of high school students, it would be necessary to write in a less complex writing style.
Project Identification The project identified in this paper is of the Northeastern State University (NSU) Social Work Practicum program. "The
Northeastern State University 's Social Work

Program Planning & Program Evaluation; Peace Domestic...
Program Planning & Program Evaluation; PEACE Domestic Violence Agency HSM 270 Abstract The overall purpose of this paper is to compare
program planning with program evaluation in a human service organization by describing how the two components are related. There will be examples
of how program planning and evaluation interrelate with the PEACE Domestic Violence Agency scenario from Appendix B. We will also look at the
technical and political aspects of program planning and evaluation that might encounter in the PEACE Domestic Violence Agency scenario, and how
these aspects could affect the planning and evaluation process. Program Planning & Program Evaluation; PEACE Domestic Violence Agency
According to Michael... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are a number of methods of collecting data, some of them are – questionnaire, surveys, checklists, interviews, observations, focus group etc
(Cordray, 1986; Einhorn and Hogarth, 1986). Once the data has been collected, it needs to be used effectively for efficient results. This is where
program planning comes in. According to Trochim and Linton (1986), there is a need for concept mapping for planning and evaluation processes. A
number of steps are involved in concept planning, such as – * Identifying the most critical need of the clientele * Accessing our ability to satisfy that
need * Planning and delivering program to address that need * Evaluating the outcome of the process Program planning is the implementation of
evaluation process. It is the groundwork where priorities are decided and the results are analyzed on a measurable scale. In the present scenario,
PEACE will use findings from the government data collection project (Secondary data collection technique) to inform the development of family and
domestic violence strategic planning, and to benchmark the impact of initiatives to violence and trauma in Portland. This will also include data by
conducting comprehensive surveys across the community, and studying police reports on the related cases (Primary data collection technique) to know
the reasons and impact of violence. This data will be used by a

Essay On Program Evaluation
Program Evaluation The Educational Leadership and Policy Studies program at the University of Texas at Arlington has helped me to grow both
personally and professionally. The top three take–aways from this program that I feel can be utilized in any career path include the knowledge I gained
on how to conduct and present action research, the writing skillset I developed which aided me in becoming a better writer, and the training I
received on how to be an effective leader. At the beginning of this program I expected to learn how to be a principal. However, during the process I
realized I learned much more. For example, I learned how to lead using content knowledge and interpersonal skills in order to create lasting and
effective ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These chats should include a moderator who is a current and experienced administrator within a school district. Online chats would be an excellent way
to make connections and/or friendships with people who will be impacting the future of education. Lastly, I believe that students would benefit from
conducting an action research project in a group versus completing a project alone. During our program we learned about allowing for different
formats during assessment or classroom activities. Therefore, I believe that some students may have preferred working with a group on such a
significant project. The fact that students would be allowed to work with people from different backgrounds and with different personality types to
complete a project would equate with real world experience. The opportunity to work with people is why the practicum is such a valuable experience.
However, one cannot carefully evaluate the practicum for this program without a brief discussion about mentors. The mentor I chose for this program
was approachable and generous with her time and knowledge. I felt comfortable enough to ask questions or admit mistakes in order to learn. At the
onset of the practicum my mentor was just my boss. At the end of the practicum I esteemed her as a colleague and friend. I believe that I was able to
experience so much during the

Evaluation Of The Article Program Evaluation Essay
Introduction The article Program Evaluation: Strategies to Facilitate Agencies' Use of Evaluation in Program Management and Policy Making
discusses the United States Government Accountability Office attempting to view how various federal agencies utilize program evaluations The
Government Accountability Office (GOA) "examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides analyses,
recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions"( U.S Government Accountability
Office, 2013, p. 1). The article discusses a sample of 4,391 individuals split from a larger population of those employed by federal agencies. Of the
population the individuals consisted of program managers and supervisors from 24 executive agencies including the Chief Evaluation Office,
Administration for Children and Families, and Food Nutrition Service. From the dates of 2012 and 2013 a web–based survey was administered in an
effort to view how program and performance evaluations are being used and complications of performance measures and information. Part I One
strength according to the article, when the participants were interviewed is that some of the mangers from these federal agencies who had evaluations
reported the tool is useful and beneficial to improving and assess the programs. It was founded that program activities such as developing performance
goals and sharing what works are ways that benefitted their

Program Evaluation Critique Essay
Program Evaluation critique to: Trish Mckay from: steven wayock subject: Team read– program evaluation Critique date: [ 10/31/2012 ] cc: Professor
Turner, Margo Jones, Trish McKay Steven Wayock's Independent program evaluation Critique Team Read's program evaluation completed by the
independent evaluator Margo Jones took an overall look at Team Read based off of statistical analysis conducted in two different phases. These
phases evaluated different scopes of Team Read, the readers the coaches and mentors. I Steven Wayock will critique this program evaluation based on
the information at hand and will offer Team Read my insight to what this evaluation did properly and what this evaluation lacked based off my
expertise. Team... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This question which is narrowed down by the results in a complicated statistical form does not address the fact that each comparison group that
Margo chose was not labeled as deficient in the classroom or on their standardized test as the Team Read readers were when they were chosen for
Team Read. These results that were detailed in Margo's evaluation lacked credibility as the sample comparison group was generally not the same
as the Team Read program participants. The participant often took what is referred to as a similar test but differs in comparison which can cause
validity issues around the board for the independent evaluator. The second research question the independent evaluator chose to ask was how does
the program affect the reading coaches? This question was extremely general and could be answered in a number of different ways; Margo chose a
questionnaire that was answered by Team Read coaches to determine whether or not they were impacted by the Team Read Program. The results were
generally positive as Trish McKay had felt the same way about the results, as they were looked upon in a positive light. The questionnaire was
administered towards the late stages of the school year as students were beginning to wind down all programs and head into summer. This questionnaire
differed in response from one area to the next on certain questionnaire questions which directly gives the Team Read program information and data that
can be interpreted to change policy

Types and Significance of Evaluation of Training Program
ASSIGNMENT # 1 Types and significance of evaluation of training program INTRODUCTION Training is vital for any and every organization. With
the changing socio–economic and technological relevance of training, the definitions, scope, methods and evaluation of training program have also
changed. One of the earlier classic definitions of training is 'bringing lasting improvement in skills in jobs'. The present day definitions take a
multi–dimensional perspective enveloping the needs of individuals, teams, organizations and the society. The steps in the training program
development are planning, programme implementation, and programme evaluation and follow–up. The evaluation of any training system helps
measure the' knowledge gap', what is... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This includes giving and receiving verbal feedback. Process Evaluation answers the question, "What did you do?" It focuses on procedures and
actions being used to produce results. * It monitors the quality of an event or project by various means. Traditionally, working as an "onlooker," the
evaluator describes this process and measures the results in oral and written reports. * Process evaluation is the most common type of training
evaluation. It takes place during training delivery and at the end of the event. Most of you probably have done it in one form or another. The
question we try to answer is "What did you do?" * Following is a sample list of the kinds of information collected to answer this question: *
Demographic data (characteristics about participants and their physical location) * What was taught; how long it took * Whether or not the objectives
were met * Who did what to whom, and when 3) Outcome evaluation Outcome evaluation determines whether or not the desired results (e.g., what
participants are doing) of applying new skills were achieved in the short–term. Outcome Evaluation answers the question, "What happened to the
knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of the intended population?" * Specific and observable changes in behaviors that lead toward healthier or more
productive lifestyles and away from problem–causing actions indicate a

Program Evaluation Program
Developing a program can be a difficult task to achieve. You have to take many things into consideration and think about short– and long–term
operation of the program. To make a program successful you have to evaluated the program, and share program results to get feedback. Program
evaluating are necessary because it forces community nutritionist to determine if the program will be a success or a failure. When they are evaluating
the program the are looking for ways to improve their program, to show accountability, and to document the program in general. When they are
improving their program they are: 1) examine their initial goals, new making goals that need to be achieved, 2)identity and improving any weakness
that are found in the content of the program and 3) measuring the effectiveness of the staff,leadership, and resources of the program. When the program
is evaluated to show accountability it justify the budget, staff resources, program and procedures, and compares program outcomes against program
standards. When evaluating to document the program it records client attendance and progress, the completeness rate of the program by clients, and
documents the weakness of the program by staff and clients.The utilization evaluation findings can help expanding the program, help increase funding,
and improve weaknesses of the program.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is important to share the results of a successful program because it helps other programs to reach their goals and obtain goals that might have been
thought to be beyond reach.A failed program shows pitfalls that can be a avoided and improve on. It helps other programs avoid spending funds on
flawed program ideas that did not work. Sharing results of a program evaluation can also increase feedback to make the program

Program Evaluation Design Preparation Assignment
Program Evaluation Design Preparation Assignment I Silvana M. Ramirez San Jose State University Program Evaluation Design Preparation
Assignment I This program evaluation examines the effectiveness of maintaining the emotional, intellectual, and social functioning of individuals
with Alzheimer's disease and the assistance in which caregivers receive through support groups as provided by Respite and Research for
Alzheimer's disease agency located in San Jose, California, serving the elderly in the adult day program. Respite and Research for Alzheimer's
Disease is a nonprofit corporation that was established in 1984. The Alzheimer's Activity Center was established in San Jose's Willow Glen area in
1986 ("Respite and Research for... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The program includes services that increase the use of cognitive skills, stimulate interaction on group and personal levels, and encourage mobility
and stability. This program offers support groups and activities for the elderly such as music therapy, garden discovery, cooking group, and arts and
crafts ("Respite and Research for Alzheimer's Disease," 2014). Furthermore, the program offers assistance to the caregivers in ways to assist their
loved one or patient with Alzheimer's. The Alzheimer's Activity Center services include but are not limited to, caregiver support groups, frontal lobe
dementia support group, men's support group, and more. Such programs as the caregiver support group directly involve the elderly with Alzheimer's
disease and the caregiver. These programs assist the caregiver and the Alzheimer's patient in better caring for their loved one suffering from this
disease. This program also offers resources for the caregivers such as links on the website to find proper day programs for patients with Alzheimer's,
respite services, caregiver techniques, and the opportunity to set up a time to speak about medication and concerns. This can be done during a support
group

Program Evaluation Time–Out is the title for the proposed program, providing prevention and solution–based services to African American high school
student–athletes in Hampton, Virginia (Baskerville, 2015). To begin with, this paper will provide a comprehensive program evaluation model for the
program. Secondly, it will outline the evaluation framework the program will use to evaluate the program. Next, the paper will provide a timeline
detailing when critical evolution task for the program will take place. Leading to, how program evaluation will maintain the program's sustainability.
From there, the paper will explain how the evaluation results will be shared with the stakeholders and the community. In conclusion, it will discuss
strategies to create a culture of evaluation within the program. Theoretical framework The program evaluation begins with the program design to
assess overall effectiveness and efficiency of implementation of the program (Calley, 2011). To illustrate the program evaluation, a theoretical
framework has been developed using Calley's Comprehensive Program Development Model's for the proposed program, using the three major
evaluations: fidelity assessment, process evaluation, outcomes evaluation. Fidelity Assessment Fidelity assessment evaluates a program's ability to
implement its original program design. With that said, the Treatment Fidelity Assessment Checklist will be used to assess the program's fidelity. In
other words, the

Do You Want A Performance Audit Or A Program Evaluation?...
Government organizations are developed out of the funding provided by the government to meet the needs of the community. In order to ensure that
these agencies are adequately meeting these needs, they are reviewed by internal or external entities. This paper will review performance audits and
program program evaluations as a form of assessments that may be conducted as well as their effectiveness in identifying the performance
expectations. Additionally, the paper will review California's Auditor Controller methods of review and the impact it has on changing current practices
of organizations. Overall, the research found will demonstrate that while a variety of assessments exist the availability to these two forms of reviews
are limited due of the tie to funding.
Types of Review
In recent times, many departments and agencies are coming under review to determine their effectiveness. The organizations' capacity to manage or
effectiveness in what it sets out to do is what is a question. In the article, "Do you want a Performance Audit or a Program Evaluation?", by Dwight F.
Davis, the author distinguishes these two practices. The author defines performance audits as it "...involve[s] a determination of the economy,
efficiency, and effectiveness of government organization..." (Davis, 1990, pg35). While program evolution is the "...systemic application of social
research procedures in assessing the conceptualization and design, implementation and utility..."(Davis, 1990, pg35).

The Program Oriented Evaluation Approaches Essay
Activity 1 Chapter 6 (Page 153)–Objectives/Program–Oriented Evaluation Approaches (OOEA): 20 Points 1.In one sentence, describe the Objectives
Oriented Evaluation Approach to program evaluation. The assessment is used to decide whether a program accomplishes the goals of the program and
ensures stakeholders stay on task producing constantly improving results by inspecting all areas of the program, including determining needs,
analyzing program costs, examining employee roles and their responsibilities, conducting an economic and efficiency audit, and deciding the next
steps the program should undertake. 2.Take one program in your school district and describe how the OOEA Approach could be used to evaluate its
efficacy. Westside Consolidated School District participates in the Summer Food Service Program that provides free meals for individuals aged
eighteen and under. An experienced unbiased evaluator should lead the evaluation and preferable have experienced unbiased assistants (i.e. out of the
district evaluators or evaluators with no direct contact or vested interest in the program). The evaluation should involve the inspection and
understanding of the stated goals of the program (i.e. to provide meals to students eighteen and under in the summer). Stated goals should be analyzed
to identify vague or redundant goals. A prior Risk Assessment Matrix is then used, modified or new one created to identify common issues of similar
programs compared to the program

Evaluation Plan for Arkansas School of the 21st Century...
Program Evaluation Plan for Arkansas School of the 21st Century Program CUR732 University of Phoenix Program Evaluation Plan for Arkansas
School of the 21st Century Program Background The Paragould School of the 21st Century was the first site implementing the Zigler model in August
1992. Startup funds were initially provided by Paragould businesses to renovate an older elementary campus. The district has grown from the Elmwood
campus of seven classrooms infants – four year olds to opening the Oakwood building housing 5 additional classrooms. S21C is an integral part of the
Paragould School District. By August, 2013, seven preschool classrooms will join kindergarten and first grade students at the new Paragould Primary
building... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The breadth or narrowness of goals espoused by 21st Century programs (and how well these goals align with centers' activities) is likely to exert a
strong influence on the types of effects achieved by individual centers and the program as a whole. While programs can produce a range of unintended
results, it is reasonable to assume that programs will effect changes in the specific outcomes they seek to influence, rather than those they see as outside
their mission or current capability (Jason, 2008). For example, programs that concentrate on improving reading achievement and exclude areas of
creative expression may see some improvements in achievement, but they are unlikely to show very many other intermediate or long–term effects (for
example, higher aspirations). Importantly, this implies that after–school programs more closely approximating the broad mix of emphases defining the
21st Century "intended program" are likely to exhibit impacts across a broader range of outcomes (Bryant, Clifford, Early, & Little, 2005).
Current State of the Program Pre–K is developing in Arkansas as a grand experiment for public–private education. Arkansas Pre–K today is inside and
outside of K–12 schools, inside public schools, institutions and centers, as well as inside private ones. For example, at the beginning of 2006, 48

Medication-Assisted Treatment Program Evaluation. Perreault
Medication–Assisted Treatment Program Evaluation Perreault et al. (2010) noted a direct link with clients' satisfaction with their treatment providers
and substantial clinical improvements. Within the medication–assisted treatment (MAT) framework, clinical improvements are vital to patients'
well–being and overall quality of life improvements. Additionally, positive and successful outcomes are fundamental for continued funding via
stakeholders, such as single–county authorities and medical insurers. This paper will first address the purpose of program evaluations. It will then
examine how to evaluate the MAT treatment model, while identifying one primary goal for the MATprogram evaluation. Lastly, an explanation of how
data will be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Houser (2015) outlined the importance of program evaluation research in giving stakeholders clear and concise data regarding treatment efficacy to
justify continued authorizations. Furthermore, MAT programs are funded in part or wholly by governmental agencies, which would also be interested
in the evaluation findings of the research. If the results were bad, their funding my switch to another provider, leaving a population without services.
Program to be Evaluated As previously discussed, the program the author would choose to evaluate is MAT treatment programs. This population
consists of individuals that have been diagnosed with opiate use disorder, and receive opiate–substitution medications, such as Methadone or
Suboxone. These program evaluations would be consumer–centered, performed in the clinics they receive services. Interested stakeholders would
include the treatment center where the participants receive services, as well as other MAT service providers. Additionally, the funding sources for
these individuals and program centers, such as county, state, and federal agencies, along with medical insurers, would also gain value from the
program evaluation research. The evaluation would consist of the client's experiences and progress during the course of their MAT treatment. MAT is
typically designed to be a long–term treatment for opiate use disorder, so

Methods Of Program Evaluation. Evaluation Research Is Offered
Methods of Program Evaluation Evaluation research is offered referred to as program evaluation, which indicates a research purpose, not a specific
research method (Maxfield, 2015, p. 280). The evaluation research purpose is to evaluate the effects of policies, for instance, new sentencing laws.
There are many types of evaluation research, such as problem analysis, evidence–based policy, and evidence generation. The purpose of this paper is to
show the important of evaluation research through an evaluation research publication.
Publication Bias in Medical Informatics Evaluation Research
The article is called "Publication Bias in Medical Informatics Evaluation Research: Is it an issue or not?," written by Christof Machan, Elske
Ammenwerth, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This will find if there is a big influence of publication bias and to give comparable statistics to this question a random sample of eighty–six references
were taking from a database. The database was based on explanative and evaluation approach, which was more quantitative. While the second question
was about the statistical assessment of publication bias that asked to what extent is a statistical assessment of publication bias for evaluation studies in
health informatics possible (Machan, 2006). This question allows for a scatter plot classifying every single study by effect size and study quality. In
order to achieve the researchers had to find a certain number of studies evaluating the systems, measuring the same effect and providing quantitative
data for effect size and study quality. The evaluation research done for this question was physician order entry system, drug prescription system, and
more quantitative.Whereas the third question was quality of reviews and meta–analyses that asked are there more systematic and narrative reviews or
more meta–analyses referenced in the database and do most of them draw positive, neutral or negative conclusion (Machan, 2006). Also, asked if there
is an issue of publication bias being dealt with by the

Essay about Program Evaluation and Its Usefulness
Program Evaluation
Jackie Woodard
Evaluation Methodology– HCS/549
December 6, 2010
Amer Kaissi
Program Evaluation Program evaluation is a tool used for evaluating and assessing a program in place. This paper will describe program evaluation
and how it can be useful for an organization wishing to determine the efficiency, effectiveness, and the impact of a program. Five of the most common
program evaluation models will be introduced. A number of different models are used by those who evaluate programs. This paper will describe, in
detail, the success case method for evaluations.
Program Evaluation and Its Usefulness Program evaluation is a process of assessing whether a program is efficient, effective, and has an impact on its
Five Most Common Types of Program Evaluation Models The five most common types of program evaluations are ones that assess the program's
efficiency, assess the program's design and theory, assess the program's impact on the community or end user, assess the program's process or
implementation, and assess the need for the program.
Success Case Model for Evaluation According to Brinkerhoff (1983), success case evaluation seeks qualitative information about a few subjects rather
than seeking thinner, quantifiable data about many subjects. The success case model derives information from those participants who have benefited
from the program according to the goals and objectives the program intends to have. This feedback may be helpful to others who have not benefitted
as well from the program. "Success cases may be studies briefly through short interviews with a few trainees or through more elaborate approaches,
such as work–sample analysis, records analysis and observation" (Brinkerhoff, 1983, para. 9). Some uses of the success case method are illustrating that
the program has a positive impact, modifying and strengthening the program being evaluated, and building data collection methods to determine the
extent of

Program Planning and Evaluation Paper
Assignment: Program Planning and Evaluation Paper
Janice Minnis
HSM/270: Programming Planning and Grant Proposal Writing in Human Services
August 21, 2011
Terri Galindo
Axia College of University of Phoenix
I have chosen to work with Program Scenario Three, PEACE Domestic Violence Agency. Yuen/Terao (2003) states, "Program planning is an
organized process through which a set of coordinated activities or interventions is developed to address and facilitate change in some or all of the
identified problems." "Program Evaluation is the application of different social research designs in assessing the needs and results of programs." In
short, Program Planning and Program Evaluation is the process of assessing needs, organizing an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The plan has added another targeted population and other agencies that will be used for particular services. The plan will outline how the relationship
between this agency and other services providers would function, and the evaluation would outline whether or not the agencies meet the guidelines set
forth by this agency and governmental guidelines. The objective that will provide young people who are or have been involved with the criminal
justice system with a rehabilitation program targets another population. The plan must define the targeted age group or groups; the plan must define
the sources targeted to work as a part of the rehabilitation program. The evaluation will determine through research, exploratory study and descriptive
research, the most effective agencies and strategies to use for the success of this type of program. The grant programs for the funding of the agency
needs a plan that will outline securing other funding that will meet the day–to–day operations of the program. Staffing, materials needed, and other
fundamentals to run a program must be taken into consideration. The budgeted amount to run the agency can be determined by the evaluation of all
that is a part of the objective and this will determine if the criteria has been met for the grants applied for. The Investor Program has a maximum
number of organizations it will fund and is based upon the objectives

Comprehensive School Counseling Program Evaluation Essay
In order to provide a comprehensive school counseling program (CSCP) that meets the unique needs of Ocean Elementary School, the school counselor
must understand the needs of the school. Therefore, conducting a needs assessment can help a new school counselor to evaluate the CSCP in order to
plan, implement, and improve the effectiveness of the program (Astramovich & Coker, 2007). Additionally, utilizing the accountability bridge
counseling program evaluation model, a continuous evaluation cycle helps to improve services based on stakeholder feedback, the needs of those
served, and outcomes (Astramovich & Coker, 2007). Within this model, a needs assessment must be conducted in order to plan and develop services
that address the needs of the students (Astramovich & Coker, 2007). Thus, by utilizing assessment questionnaires, the school counselor can gather
information from the diverse population of students, parents, teachers, and administrator to determine how the CSCP can best support all students'
needs (American School Counselor Association [ASCA], 2012). Additionally, the use of other data, such as observations,standardized test scores,
absentee rates, and student referrals can support the feedback received on the questionnaires. Based on the data, the school counselor can evaluate the
school counseling program in order to improve the program in the domain areas of academic, social/emotional, and career development. Thus, within
the accountability bridge counseling

Overview Program Evaluation Essay
Overview of Program Evaluation
HCS/549
April 15, 2013
Overview of Program Evaluation
Program evaluation is a useful resource to evaluate programs that are currently an organization or an industry is making good use of. Evaluating
programs not only bring out the strengths and weaknesses but also identifies the picture of the plans implemented. The purpose of this paper is to
examine the purpose for program evaluation and why it can be useful to an organization. This paper will speak of the five most common types of
program evaluation models and will select one program evaluation model to describe from week one's reading.
Purpose for program evaluation
"There is only one overall purpose for program evaluation activities: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Each of the models discussed includes emphases that are valid aspects of program evaluation. "One value of thinking about models lies in developing
an appreciation of the range of questions evaluators can consider. The specific questions being addressed by an evaluation or the specific aspects of
the program setting often make one or another of the models especially useful" (Posavac & Carey, 2007, p.23–25). The models: The traditional
model, Social Science model, Industrial Inspection model, Black Box Evaluation, and Objectives–Based Evaluation model, are very common and
helpful in different types of organizations and environment. The model that is very interesting to use and describe is the Objective–Based Evaluation
model.
Objectives–Based Evaluation
In an effort to design an evaluation for a specific program, some approaches emphasize working with clearly stated program goals and objectives so
that the degree to which such goals and objectives are achieved can be measured. "This has been the most prevalent model used for program
evaluation. Examining goals and objectives seems to be an essential aspect of evaluation; it is important to judge a program relative to its particular
structure and what it is designed to achieve" (Posavac & Carey, 2007, p.23–25). It is very important for organizations to clearly and closely
examine their

Pre-Program Evaluation Essay
The purpose of our evaluation is to assess if the girls who participate in the GRL program, apply the skills and knowledge they acquire upon
completion of the program. To answer this question, we will use a pre–experimental research design consisting of pre–test and post–test surveys, as
well as a post–test focus group for more in depth narratives. The purpose of the pre–test and the post–test is to ascertain the types of behaviors and
habits the girls have prior to their participation in the GRL program and see how these change after the 16–week program.
To answer our main question we will first categorize the range of behaviors and habits as desirable or undesirable. Then using descriptive statistics we
will determine the frequency of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Our findings will demonstrate the range of behaviors, habits, and understandings the girls have in the areas of coping skills, life skills, professional
pathways, and healthy relationships, prior to and after their participation in GRL. Descriptive statistics will help us see if there is a change in the girls'
understanding and behaviors between the two points in time, the direction of the change. Additionally, a paired sample t–test will help us understand if
the change is statistically significant. We will also be able to demonstrate in what areas the program was most impactful, and if any demographic
factors predicted the program's effectiveness. However, due to the small sample size and the lack of a control group, we cannot control for the validity
of the findings nor necessarily assume generalizability.
The findings from the evaluation of the GRL program will be disseminated in a comprehensive formal report for accountability, participant progress,
and program effectiveness. However, abbreviated versions of the report may be used according to the audience to which the information is directed.
The GRL focus group discussion will be recorded and sent to GRL staff to view for any program improvements or necessary changes. The findings of
this evaluation will be used by GRL

Consider how you would evaluate your Program relative to each of the components Linnan and Steckler (2002) describe the following key process
evaluation components: Context–aspects of the larger social environment that may affect implementation; Reach–the proportion of the intended
audience to whom the program is actually delivered; Dose–delivered–The amount of intended units of each program component that is delivered;
Dose–received–the extent to which participants engage with the program; Fidelity–the extent to which the intervention was delivered as intended (
Bartholomew et al., 2011. p.525). Program evaluation is an important tool to show that the health interventions have been effective and they also intend
to improve the health... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As such, it's important that the evaluation approach be useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate" (CDC, 2013). All the above components of the
framework should be applied to the adolescent tobacco program evaluation. What are your indicators for each component? The proportion of the
intended target audience (adolescents) that participates in an intervention (tobacco cessation) is often measured by attendance. Reach is a feature of
the target audience. Dose delivered is a function of efforts of the intervention providers. The extent to which participants actively engage with, interact
with, are receptive to, and/or use materials or recommended resources (e.g., Web sites, videos, brochures, newspaper advertisements, posters, telephone
quit line, behavioral therapy etc.) (Linnan & Steckler, 2002). Dose received is an attribute of the target audience and it measures the extent of
commitment of participants with the intervention (Linnan & Steckler, 2002). "Fidelity is a function of the intervention providers. A composite score
that indicates the extent to which the intervention has been implemented and received by the intended audience" (Linnan & Steckler, 2002). According
to an article by Wierenga et al. (2013), "Of these eight components, six components focus on implementation (reach, recruitment,

Program Evaluation
The program evaluation will use a mixed method–approach drawing data from both quantitative and qualitative data sources. The data will be gathered
and determined that it is valid, accurate and reliable. Upon summarization of the data a list of recommendations will be developed based on the results
obtained. These recommendations will be valid and justifiable in order to alter or continue the program. These recommendation will be efficient,
practical and capable of being implemented. To analyze the population that is receiving services and provide information that describes the program, a
quantitative analysis will be used. This will help when discussing the program with stakeholders and potential future funders such as the Robert Wood
Johnson... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These factors include ethnicity, poverty, and immigration status. The evaluation will be analyzed to better deliver the services to the target population
of uninsured and underinsured children. The comparing of different groups will be done through contingency tables. The qualitative analysis such as
the interviews, surveys and data will gather themes that are present in all of the information. The qualitative data source will serve a purpose for
program accountability, monitoring and improvement. The participant surveys, staff interviews, and funder's focus group will provide information on
whether the program is operating as expected, how the program is operating and which part of the program is more or less successful. This
evaluation will be utilized by many of the stakeholders. The program manager and the staff of Department of Health and Social Services will use the
findings to refine program strategies. The findings will help guide the program to focus on areas that are most crucial for effective service delivery. The
clinical staff of all the public schools will use the findings to steer the children's families to obtain health care coverage and connect them with the
program. Robert Wood Johnson foundation will use the findings to determine the future funding distribution for the program. The superintendent of
Stamford Public Schools will use the findings in advocacy efforts.

Implementation Of A Transitional Care Program Evaluation
For a transitional care program evaluation, it is requisite to combine two separate theories to aid in addressing the problem of poor transitional care
outcomes, the process of measuring outcomes, and the creation of recommendations for improvement. A middle range nursing theory, Transitions
theory centers on the process of individuals' transitions and addresses the barriers to and principles of successful transitional outcomes (Meleis, 2010).
The theory is both descriptive and predictive, it can be used to further describe and define the problem of poor transitions and its barriers as well as
identify outcomes that signal successful interventions in individuals (Meleis, Sawyer, Im, Messias, & Schumacher, 2000). The indicators of successful
interventions as defined by Transitions Theory can guide the selection of the types of outcomes to be measured by the program evaluation to ensure
that outcomes that reflect transitional success are selected. Furthermore, the principles of healthy transitions identified by Transitions Theory will aid
in the creation of recommendations for program improvement. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) will be joined with Transitions Theory in the
program evaluation. Although originally developed by business managers, CQI is best known for its use in manufacturing settings, specifically in the
automotive industry (Radawski, 1999). CQI was created with customers (patients) as the center of its philosophy; consequentially, the model

Introduction The purpose of a program evaluation is to assess working programs and determine if the outcomes are sufficiently effective (Houser,
2015). Program Evaluations are a type of action research leading to improved programs and services for the designated populations. Feedback from
stakeholders is necessary to confirm the program is operating to the highest quality and standards (Astramovich & Coker, 2007). The program
conducted serves adult military personnel who are diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The program implements Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy (CBT) through a twelve–week program consisting of twenty–four, sixty minute sessions. The stakeholders include military
personnel and their family, veterans and their family, The U.S. Department of Veterans Affair, and the U.S. Government. The program will be dissected
in order to identify the goals, data and instrumentation, data analysis, and dissemination of the program evaluation.
Goals of the Program Evaluation The first goal of the CBT program is to identify methods for implementing CBT on to military bases to support
military personnel who have been diagnosed with PTSD. The first data point supports the goal through a qualitative focus group with the deliverance of
a psychoeducation on PTSD to military personnel and their families. A second data point to support the program is the use of quantitative structured
interviews with military personnel and family members about their experience

Evaluation Plan For Training And Development Program
Training and development is a key component to any organization's current and future success. By fostering a learning oriented organization, you are
creating a culture and environment that will deliver high quality service and products, anticipate and prepare for the future needs of the organization,
and increase both customer and employee satisfaction. Training and development must be supported by the Human Resource function, and utilized by
senior management to drive staffing strategy and decisions, performance management, and meet operational goals. In order for the training and
development program to be successful at all levels, it must be properly designed, implemented, and evaluated. Below, we will discuss the seven steps of
the training design process to demonstrate the best practices and organizational importance of a strong training and development program.
The seven steps of the training design process are: a needs assessment, ensuring employee readiness for training, creating a learning environment,
ensuring the transfer of training, developing an evaluation plan, selecting a training method, and monitoring and evaluating the program (Noe, 2013, p.
11). Starting with the needs assessment, it consists of "three elements: organizational analysis, person analysis, and task analysis" (Noe, 2013, p. 121).
Organizational analysis "is concerned with identifying whether training suits the company's strategic objectives, and whether the company has the
budget, time, and

Program Evaluation Essay
To ensure that my program evaluation is objective, credible and fair I would employ internal and external counselors or advisors as well as align my
program evaluation with the standards and practices of the professional body of evaluators. These "advisors "may or may not include the program
stakeholders, but would not negate the formal process of collaborating with key stakeholders. Rather, the purpose of my advisor team is to see and
hear things I missed. These advisors are to me as the evaluator as the football coach is to the quarterback: the coach/ advisors supply information to the
quarterback/evaluator who directs the game/evaluation. In addition, I would employ Fitzpatrick's advice to consider a wide array of methods to collect
information. Multiple methods can be used to increase validity, to enhance understanding, or to inform subsequent data collection. (Fitzpatrick, 2011).
By using multiple methods, instead a singular method helps to keep my evaluation objective and credible. Employing multiple methods also helps to
check my personal... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Moving from my informal evaluation methods acquired from examine my biases, to mitigate against bias in a more" formal "evaluation process the
evaluator still first must examine themselves honestly and be clear on their position, their allegiances and their adversaries. It goes without saying that
evaluation reports should not be unfair, unbalanced or inaccurate. Yet truth is elusive and even the most scrupulous evaluator must struggle to see that
carefully collected and analyzed information is not later distorted, intentionally or unintentionally in presentation. Then look at the American
Evaluation Association's Guiding Principles, briefly stated

Health Program Evaluation: Northern Territory Emergency...
Introduction: This evaluation is based on the outcome of the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) program which was aimed at examining
whether specific measures had been effective and comprehensive and led to improved and sustainable outcomes in safety, health, education and
employment of indigenous people in Australia(1). The evaluation of NTER was carried out by a group of experts from different fields. This
assignment will focus on the interventions such as Child Health Check Initiative (CHCI) which was introduced to improve the general health status of
the children in the Northern Territory. This was also a component of NTER. Key evaluation questions will be considered for this intervention as they
help to determine the design,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
d)How many specialists in different fields of medicine will be required for the screening programs? Adequate and efficient human resource is key to the
success of screening programs (3). Impact evaluation questions might focus on the intended program outcomes on child health and include: (a)What
was the likely impact of the CHCI on the indigenous children? Did the program helped to reduced mortality and morbidity among the indigenous
children? (b)Was the program responsive and culturally acceptable within the indigenous communities? How did the guardians of the children
responded to the initiative? Was it compulsory or voluntary in terms of participation? (c)Did the CHCI reached the intended population? How many
children get checked and received treatment? How many children refused to come for checkup? (d)How were the follow–up programs coordinated?
What was the impact of the follow–up services? Was there any policy reform due to the implementation of the program? ETHICAL
CONSIDERATIONS Virginia, M. (2008) described ethics as principles for morality with intention to prevent harm, promote wellness, respect, justice
and fairness (4). Evaluation of projects in communities especially with people considered to be vulnerable have to consider the need to protect the
participants from any perceived harm. Wright, M. et al (2007) reported on the seriousness of respecting Aboriginal people in any interventions that
concern them (5). A School Nutrition

Program Evaluation Paper
Choosing an evaluation depends, to a great extent, on the program being presented to stakeholders, clients or other individuals; the program must
encompass different aspects that would directly affect the plan's efficiency, effectiveness, cost and overall purpose.
Alvin Independent School District, for instance, has a program in place which assists individuals between the ages of 18 and 21 to earn a high school
diploma. The goal of this program is to target the demographic needs of the community and the drop–out rate within the school district. Further, this
program aligns itself with the school district's goals and academic performance, which states that "emphasis will be placed on initiating strategies aimed
at closing the achievement ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this case, applying a utilitarian model called the objectives–oriented model would allow the individuals conducting the evaluation to "determine the
extent to which program objectives have been achieved" (Daniels, 2010, p. 176). Further, in this case, the application of the Provus discrepancy model
can be part of program's assessment of data which establishes whether the program requires improvements, adjustments, termination or, if the program
should continue on its course (Daniels, 2010). It is the design of Provus discrepancy model which would allow the counselor and administrators to
effectively present the results of the program for the evaluation targets concrete results, such as, student enrollment and graduation. Every academic
year, OPTIONS accepts students who experience personal circumstances which do not allow them to continue an education and, thus, and encounter
difficulties in acquiring a job. Until now, the OPTIONS program has been an invaluable asset to the community, the school district, and, above all, the
individual student who surpasses different obstacles to obtain a higher degree of

Program Evaluation And Measurement Tools
Program Evaluation and Measurement tools Hypertension (HTN) is a chronic illness that serves as a main risk factor for cardiovascular disease
(Hanus, Simoes, Amboni, Ceretta, & Tuon, 2015). Although medication can manage HTN appropriately, lifestyle modifications make a substantial
difference as well. However, many patients go through behavior stages in which he or she contemplate on making the necessary changes to improve
their health. One solution to the problem is the development of an educational Hypertension Intervention and Follow–Up program (HIFP). Studies
have shown that active educational interventions that incorporate small groups are more effective than passive delivery of educational materials
(Pimenta, Caldiera, & Mamede,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Utilizing the CDC's framework for evaluation will allow the program design to be tailored for implementation. Efficacy is defined as the ability to
produce the desired result ("Efficacy," n.d.). One way to establish efficacy is to test the knowledge of the health care providers. The blood pressure
program will be ineffective if the providers lack HTN knowledge. The author will plan to evaluate fluctuations in employee knowledge, attitudes, and
viewpoints about blood pressure screening and control. Furthermore, the health care team members need to understand how to measure a manual blood
pressure adequately. Accurate blood pressure readings will facilitate more validity in the results (CDC, 2014). Efficiency distinctly represents the ability
to accomplish tasks in the least amount of time and effort ("Efficiency," n.d.). Measurement tools used for determining efficiency will be proper
staffing, working equipment, various sizes of blood pressure cuffs, and acceptable space for the program. Quality is the characteristic or feature that
something possesses ("Quality," n.d.). Trained health care providers will aid the program in obtaining good quality. Also, new sphygmomanometer that
are calibrated and education pamphlets will serve as increasing the quality of the program. Intervention Plan Outcomes Short–term outcomes The
short–term goals of

Program Planning and Evaluation Paper Hsm/270
Program Planning and Evaluation Paper
HSM/270
June 17th, 2012
Bonita Comer
Program Planning and Evaluation Paper Program planning is a process to achieve a particular goal and/or mission. Program planning is an organized
process through which a set of coordinated activities or interventions is developed to address and facilitate change in some or all of the identified
problems. Program evaluation provides useful information for improving the programs and the service delivery systems. Program evaluation is to
improve the program planning, effectiveness, design, and efficiency. The two are different processes, but ideally they hold the same goals and/or
mission. The evaluation process takes place after the planning of a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With this being stated; a program evaluation should be performed to see what changes need to be made to help their mission. It is clear that the
services that they are providing are not as effective any more. Some technical and political aspects of the program planning and evaluation I might
encounter in the program scenario I chose, may be trying to reach out to those individuals that are or have been involved with the criminal justice
system. Funding may not allow for these services to be provided to these individuals. Another aspect may be that the community is not aware of this
program and the services that it provides. Grants could be another issue. If the program cannot show its effectiveness then grants may not be given
and this could results in loss of services provided. A political aspect could be that one "favoritism" over evaluations. Some may use their political
influence to "guide" the evaluation to present or not present the "selected" truth. (Yuen, 2003) There are many pressures from the individual who
performs the evaluation to make it look; "good" This is a big political concern for programs. The technical concern or aspect could be the service
delivery method, using the inputs and outputs to be utilized to perform the programs mission. The first concern would be how they will approach their
specific target. The program planning should have this dilemma worked out so they will

Evaluation Of A Student Program
School Committees, RTI Members of the IEP team are, the school psychologist, school counselor, assistant principal of special education, speech
therapist, occupational therapist, physical therapist and social workers. Members of the PPT are the same members of the IEP including the RTI
coordinator. The PPT uses an individual case conference to determine if the needs of that individual student have suggestions for school wide
interventions or programs. If the student is having problems academically or behaviorally, the PPT closely examines that student's case to see if the
school can change to better this student. As described by the school psychologist, RTI is a three–tier program that mainly focuses on prevention. The
school concentrate on prevention by ensuring the school is using appropriate and evidence based methods to work with all students. RTI assist the
school in determining which students need individual intervention and services and makes the PPT /IEP team aware of areas where there are school
wide issues that need to be addressed. The PPT team determines what tier the student should be categorized in by using observational notes and
academic data. Tier 1 is standards aligned instructions for all students and is the benchmark. Tier 2 is supplemental interventions for students at some
risk and is strategic. Tier 3 is supplemental interventions for students at high risk and is intensive. The PPT performs according to the tier the child
falls into. The RTI plays a

Consider how you would evaluate your program relative to each of the components. Linnan and Steckler (2002) describe the following key process
evaluation components: Context–aspects of the larger social environment that may affect implementation; Reach–the proportion of the intended
audience to whom the program is actually delivered; Dose–delivered–The amount of intended units of each program component that is delivered;
Dose–received–the extent to which participants engage with the program; Fidelity–the extent to which the intervention was delivered as intended (
Bartholomew et al., 2011. p.526). Program evaluation is an important tool to show that the health interventions have been effective and they also
intend to improve the health of the target population. Evaluation helps define the worth of a program. It is imperative to conduct program evaluation
in order to provide feedback to improve the effectiveness of the program. Evaluation plans should be developed at the beginning of the health
program interventions. The CDC framework for program evaluation is comprised of the following steps:1) Engage stakeholders; 2) Describe the
program; 3) Focus on evaluation design; 4) Gather credible evidence; 5) Justify conclusions; 6) Ensure use and share lessons learned. Also listed are
the four standards for assessing the quality of evaluation activities: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy (CDC, 2013). According to an article in
the CDC (2013), "As noted in the

Program Evaluation : An Essential Tool For Value Check
Introduction Over the years, program evaluation is an essential tool for value check of either the whole program or some aspect of the program
(Psoavac and Carey, 2007). Program evaluation is more popular in health related educational programs. In order to determine the extent the
educational system achieves its stated objectives and goals, Tylers in the 1930s developed a model (Owston, 2008). The model developed by Tylers
shows a deliberate simplification of how the objectives of the education program are achieved. Tylers evaluation model was used in one or two
generations of educational program evaluators (Scriven, 1999), and acts as a basis for developing the present models. However, the present models
went beyond determining the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The aim of this essay is to provide an overview of three evaluation models based on their different conceptual approaches. Kirkpatrick, logic and
Context/input/process/product (CIPP) models are the three models discussed in this essay. The three models were chosen because of their relevance
and popularity in evaluating educational programs. The first part of this essay explains in details with examples the three models. Subsequently, an
objective of a Nigerian physiotherapy educational program will be used to compare and contrast the three models. The overview of the models The
conceptual approaches to evaluation of an educational program are not the techniques, rather the major theoretical assumptions for each of the
evaluation models (Fitzpatrick et al., 2004). Goal–oriented (objective –oriented) and system–oriented (management–oriented) are the two popular
approaches adopted by some of the evaluation models. For instance, Logic model adopted the goal–oriented approach while the CIPP adopted the
system–oriented approach. Kirkpatrick model's multi–level application is flexible to adapt to any of the approaches. The goal–oriented approach
simply determines the extent to which the goals of a program are achieved (Eseryel, 2002), while system–oriented, specifically the
management–oriented approach, is based on using systems of education as input, process and output to provide information for decision making (
Alkin, 2011).

Evaluation Of An Anti Bullying Program
Initially we thought we were going to be able to conduct an evaluation, but with lack of time, we realized that was no longer feasible. Instead, we
decided to take the idea of focusing on the evaluation tools and develop an evaluation how–to of Rachel's challenge. Our goal was to have a manual to
present to UVMC and allow them to continue the evaluation further with our guided manual. During our evaluation of Rachel's Challenge, it became a
concern to us that this program wasn't really a bullying prevention program, but more a program focused on character building. After a lack of
communication between the UVMC and Rachel's Challenge connections we decided to shift our focus. We still wanted our final product to be a
manual, but decided to focus on presenting it to a broader audience. What we went forward with was developing a how–to manual for evaluating an
anti–bullying program. As I had already done some background research, getting started went smoothly.
The process of developing the manual began with our previous class work. We used our complied work as a reference point to set up the contents of
the manual. Since our class work was focused on Rachel's Challenge we had to redo everything, minus my background work. Section were divided
between Taylor and I and we each were responsible for three sections and manual and split responsibility for continuing research on the background
section. Dr. Green suggested we meet with Randy, a research specialist from the library.

Memo Program Evaluation Of Internal Auditing System

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Memo Program Evaluation Of Internal Auditing System

Similar to Memo Program Evaluation Of Internal Auditing System (11)

More from Ann Montgomery

More from Ann Montgomery (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Memo Program Evaluation Of Internal Auditing System