The Manor System Thrived In The Middle Ages

The Manor System Thrived In The Middle Ages
The manor system is an economic arrangement between both the lords and the serfs. There is a mutual agreement between them. This was a basic
economic system that thrived in the Middle Ages. During these times, the manor was the lord's property. This is where he would live and thrive.
The lord's were high on the feudal pyramid which meant they were almost as great as kings. They would give land out in exchange for a bond. This
may be raising farmland or having military protection. The people in these places were called vassals and kept the manor system moving. The manors
would be like small towns. The peasants that lived on the manor would never stray more than 25 miles away in their lifetime. Usually there may be
15–30 families living on a manor at a time. A manor may have a church, farms, a house for lord although there were workshops as well throughout the
manor. Furthermore, these communities were very self–sufficient, and this benefited the lords greatly. The serfs and peasants have to work and provide
things such as crops, milk and cheese, fuel, cloth, leather goods, and lumber. All of these items were needed for the lord's daily life. Certain items had
to be purchased from the outside due to it not being available in their area.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Feudalism captivates over the lord's giving certain rights and land in return for work. These workers would provide all the items needed for these
places to survive. Although these peasants worked a lot, their lives were very tough. These individuals have to pay enormous taxes for everything.
They had to pay a church tax, this was further known as a tithe, and consisted of 10 percent of their pay. They also had to pay taxes for grains many
tried to avoid this but, nevertheless it was a crime in these times. There was also a tax on marriage as well as having the need for consent from the
lord on these marriages. The lives of the peasants were very tough in these
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Social Classes In Regency England
Social Classes in Regency England Regency England was very different from the world today. Society revolved around social classes, which
typically correlated with wealth and family ties. There were many different social classes in the era. The highest class in society was the royal family,
consisting of the king, queen, prince, and princess. The next highest class would be the aristocracy. This would include dukes, marquesses, earls,
viscounts, and barons (Ray 37). Knights and baronets were not included in this class. They were considered commoners (Ray 38). The gentry was a
very wide class. Land–owning males in the gentry, like Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice, were called gentlemen (Ray 39; Gao). Ladies were also
considered gentry (Ray 12). With all of these different classes, one might say thatsocial classes played a big factor in Regency England society. The
way people lived in Regency England depended on the class they belonged in. Their estate, their clothes, and their vehicles were all influenced by
their class. In Pride and Prejudice, Mr. Darcy, who was a gentleman, owned the Pemberley estate (Ray 219; Austen 163). It was a beautiful, large,
stone estate on high ground, surrounded by woods and nature (Austen 163). This showed that Mr. Darcy was clearly upper class. Since he was upper
class, he also dressed the part. He wore tight breeches, ruffled shirts with neck clothes, and high–collared jackets ("Pride and Prejudice," Novels).
Owning a personal carriage showed

The Regency Society During The Regency Period
During the Regency society, what made a man a true gentleman is still a confusing matter for many Austenesque and Regency readers (Grace). Many
of the 19th century occupations have vanished because of changes in taste, socials customs, and technological advances (Pool 235). While some of the
men during the Regency period were extremely wealthy, there were others that faced financial hardships (Grace). Most of time, the road of
apprenticeship often led to a successful life and good fortune (Pool 240). The most gentlemanly professions during the Regency period were the
clergymen, lawyers, and army officers.
Many of the men during the Regency period that desired to keep their status as a gentleman often went into a church profession (Grace). Many
gentlemen that were OxBridge graduates and younger brothers entered the clergy (Ray 189). For many families that had a steady, guaranteed
income, the church was a popular option for them (Grace). There were two different types of clergyman, vicar and curate. While being a clergyman
required no strenuous physical labor, it did require a Honors degree either from Oxford or Cambridge (Grace; Ray 189). For the most part, the gentry
class were the only ones that could actually afford a degree from Oxford or Cambridge to become a clergyman (Ray 189). Another job opportunity in
the church included the priest. The priests during this time were respected by society mostly because of their association with the church (Ray 189). In
the novel,

Social Classes Romeo And Juliet
Ms. Groff
World Literature
3 March, 2016
Social Classes Romeo and Juliet
George Edward Woodberry once said, "Shakespeare is, essentially, the emanation of the Renaissance. The overflow of his fame on the Continent in
later years was but the sequel of the flood of the Renaissance in Western Europe. He was the child of that great movement, and marks its height as it
penetrated the North with civilization" ("George Edward Woodberry Quote"). The Renaissance, as Woodberry stated within his quote, would not have
been as popular if it was not for William Shakespeare. He is a crucial part of the Renaissance. Not only did Shakespeare have an impact on the
Renaissance, social class did as well. Social Classes have been building for many years and they made a tremendous difference during the
Renaissance, to the point where the social classes controlled society. The Renaissance was a time period of rebirth and Shakespeare was taking
advantage of that by contributing a majority of his pieces of writing, as well as his plays. One of his most known pieces of work is Romeo and
Juliet. Shakespeare uses the idea of social classes and portrays it throughout his play, Romeo and Juliet. He generates various characters and places
them into different social ranks and standing. This impacts the play significantly and brings a new light and perspective on Shakespeare 's writing.
Shakespeare also illustrates the specific advantages each social class received during the this time period and within

The Rule of the Major Generals
The Major General rule was an idea by Cromwell to help reduce the threat of royalist conspiracy and to help further his need for 'healing and settling'.
However, the rule lasted less than a year due its unpopularity and lack of support from the local gentry. In addition, the Major Generals themselves
were either inconsistent in their application of the aims or were negligent in their duties. Furthermore, the unrealistic aims of the rule set them up for
failure before the rule had even begun, historian Farr comments on the limits of the generals' power and the fact that it's no wonder the rule failed as
the scope of the tasks were impossible to fulfil.
Whilst all of these factors play a part in the failure of the Major Generals rule, the most significant is its negligence by the Major Generals themselves.
Its unpopularity and unrealistic aims could have been overcome if every generals was both optimistic about their role and fully committed to the cause.
The lack of responsibility of the Major Generals led to the public not thinking they could support the rule, and rather than help the rule, cause its demise.
Farr further suggests that it was its practical failure, rather than alleged unpopularity which led to the rule failing. However, Sharp explains that the
establishment of the Major Generals did more to alienate the gentry than any other move and in terms on of 'healing and settling', it was a disaster.
The rule of the Major Generals was not popular, the gentry deeply

What Are The Characteristics Of A Knight
Knights: Knights are honorable, courageous, and the strongest in the kingdom. Knights were entrusted with the job of protecting all, even the
peasants and serfs. All those in training had to go through many different tasks to become a knight. Starting at the young age of seven they leave
their homes and go to a lord's castle to become a page. As a page, they learn how to ride a horse, would receive religious instruction, learn how to
sing, dance, compose music, and play the harp. All skills valued in a knight. After about 7 years of being a page, you become a squire. A squire
would spend most of his time with his lord, which was a knight. A squire would care towards his lord's equipment, take care of his horse, even
waiting on his lord at mealtime. Squires would then become knights, a loyal protector of the kingdom. They would have to do special
preparations before being crowned knight, after doing such, they are then ready to be crowned. Their lord would take their sword and lightly
touch the squire's shoulders with the flat side of the sword. They are then crowned knight and a protector of the kingdom. Monarchs: The
monarchs were at the top of the kingdom. The one with the most power, respected by all and never rebelled against. Most of them believed in the
divine right of kings, the idea the God had given them the right to rule. The power of the monarchs actually varied greatly. For example, some
worked hard to maintain their kingdoms, few had enough wealth to keep their armies, and others had to rely on their vassals to provide enough
knights and soldiers. In some places, especially during the Early Middle Ages, great lords grew very powerful and governed their fiefs, estates of
land in the feudal system, as independent states. In these cases, the monarchs were little more than figureheads. Peasants: Peasants were at the bottom
of the social class. Peasants were like servants, they would farm their lord's land in order to support the feudal structure. Most of the peasants cared
for the livestock and raised the crops. Every manor had peasants who were also shoemakers, smiths (metal workers), carpenters, and other skilled
workers. Peasant women would only work in the fields

Role Of Food In The Elizabethan Era
THESIS STATEMENT: During the Elizabethan era various types of foods were eaten and extensive details were added to these foods. Social classes
also played a big role in what the rich or poor ate.
I.Elizabethan meals were eaten at a specific time during the day. Depending on the job, civilians ate at different a time or place.
A.People of this era usually ate three meals a day which consisted of: breakfast, dinner, and supper.
1.Breakfast was eaten right after getting up in the morning. It was normally a small meal made up of cold foods like leftovers, eggs, or bread and
butter. "But since breakfast was by definition eaten early, those who did not rise early did not eat it."
2.Farmers would only go to church services on Sundays because ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bread was strictly controlled in amount and

How Important Was the Crown in Maintaining the Political...
How important was the crown in maintaining the Political stability of Tudor England?
Tudor England was time of rebellion and turmoil. The head of Tudor England ,the monarch,was responsible for keeping his or her country running
well. The crown was the sublime leader he or she ran the government and parliament and therefore he or she were responsible for maintaining
political stability during this period. Tudor society was the epicentre of Tudor politics. The power of your words within the political world depended
on your rank in the society. Higher ranks had their say whilst low ranking people of the society did what the higher ranked noblemen and earls said.
The highest ranks were governed by the Monarch. Henry VII ordered ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Across the countryside of South East England he constructed 55 palaces and employed Holbein a German artist to create imposing and powerfully
striking portraits of himself. These powerful portraits were also imposed on coinage. Coins in Henry VIII's reign showed Henry wearing his imperial
crown. In Edward IV's reign,even though he was a mere child,he was depicted wearing full battle armour on royal coins. Coinage was vitally important
in maintaining political stability. For the majority of the Tudor population the portraits stamped on to their coins were the only visual image they had
of the monarch. If the coins showed a powerful and wealthy portrait of the ruling monarch then this is what the laity would presume the monarch
was,therefore this was an effective way of keeping political support of the common people.
Even though coins gave the laity an idea of what the monarch looked like,it was still as equally important for the monarch to show himself in person
to his subjects. During summer months it was not unusual for the whole court to regularly move from place to place on progress. These processions
gave a chance for the laity to to have a glance at the royal person and also gave the monarch a chance to entertain and impress local gentry who did not
have access to the royal court in London. Even though these procession's were used to gain support from all over England in truth they were mainly
confined

Feudal Society In Medieval Europe
A feudal society is one in which the lords carry a significant measure of power by owning land. Workers known as Serfs are included on the land.
Serfs owe the lord a certain amount of labor as well as give the lord a portion of their goods. The lords then gives protection to the serfs from their
knights. To get knights, the lord offers a fief(land) to the knight in exchange for military service. A feudal society had the characteristic of being
decentralized. It also had major roles and responsibilities that everyone needed to follow in order to keep the society intact. During the early Middle
Ages, decentralized governments, attacks from the Vikings and other barbarians, and the strong power of the Church strongly abetted the formation of
the feudal society in Medieval Europe. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When a government system is decentralized, then it may lack a strong military and infrastructure. After the fall of Charlemagne's empire, his society
required a lot of strong lords with powerful armies to protect the people because there was no strong centralized government. This led to feudalism
because the people were in need of protection and had no strong centralized government to make a strong army. The feudal society consisted of a
decentralized government and had a strong army.
Another factor that led to the development of feudal societies, were the attacks from the Vikings and other barbarians. Because The Vikings were so
fierce and quick when they attacked, it made them almost indefensible and very difficult to fight. When Charlemagne's empire fell, it suffered many
attacks from The Vikings that gradually weakened their government. Feudalism allowed for protection of everyone and people did not need to rely on
a strong, centralized

Feudalism During The Middle Ages
Feudalism is the military, social, and political system of the Middle Ages based on protective alliances and land–holding. The word comes from the
Latin word feudum which means fief, an estate of land. The feudal system was based off of the obligations and rights of people living during the
time. Landowners, also known as lords, gave their land in exchange for military protection and other services. This granted land was called a fief,
meanwhile, the person receiving it was called a vassal. Feudalism not only depended but also functioned on the control of land. Without this "two–sided
bargain" feudalism would not become successful during the Middle Ages.
The feudal society was structured much like a pyramid. At the very top and peak, was the

Elizabethan Food
During the Elizabethan era various types of foods were eaten and extensive details were added to these foods. Social classes also played a big role
in what the rich or poor ate. Elizabethan meals were eaten at a specific time during the day. Depending on the job, civilians ate at different a time
or place. People of this era usually ate three meals a day, which consisted of: breakfast, dinner, and supper. Breakfast was eaten right after getting
up in the morning. It was normally a small meal made up of cold foods like leftovers, eggs, or bread and butter. "But since breakfast was by
definition eaten early, those who did not rise early did not eat it." Farmers would only go to church services on Sundays because they were usually
very busy during the rest of the week, but others went daily to early services. The Noble social class did not get up early enough to eat breakfast. Dinner
was a mid–day meal that was eaten 11 am or 12 pm. Farmers would take their meal with them in a bag or have it delivered to them. Craftsmen would
close up shop and go upstairs to the home area, their wife would have the meal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The common person usually ate "white meat" that contained precious little meat, made of things like, milk cheese, butter, eggs, bread, and pottages.
These were sometimes derivative of fish, rabbit, or bird. Killing larger game in the forest was considered poaching and was very dangerous. Gentry
and rich folks ate "brown meats" like: beef, venison, mutton, and pork. The poor also ate a lot more vegetables than the rich that insisted on eating only
greens that were fancily prepared. Peasants had easy access to beef, pork, and other high–end meats, but they couldn't afford to keep a lot of it for their
personal meals. They could make it just fine without fancy dishes eaten by their richer social class. Nutritionists today would appreciate the peasant's
simple

Feudalism In The Middle Ages
Feudalism was a very popular social system in the Medieval ages, and provided a give and take system for both parties. It was a fairly simple
system, those of nobility or higher power would give up some of their land (also called a fief) to the peasants (or serfs) and offered them
protection in exchange for them working the land and being sent out to war when needed. This allowed for both parties to gain something out of the
transaction and was the basis of the relationship between a lord and a vassal. Although it was a simple system, due to their being so many barons,
dukes and earls who were in theory loyal to the king and his family which could start a fight with the king, vassals could end up having their land in
the middle of a war zone or be given multiple pieces of land by mistake, which would confuse the contract. There was... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Overall, the system could become very confusing due to constant deaths of serfs, wars breaking out, and nobility turning sides, all this would end
up leading to not knowing who really owned what land and who they could be protected by. Monasticism is the practice of living your life was a
monk and is practiced in many religions today, as well as back in the medieval ages. It is practiced by those who wish to reach a level of spiritual
hope, or become a leader within their religion. It involves separating oneself from others and living as a hermit alone, or joining a group (cult) of
others who share similar intentions. Most of the people who practiced this would spend their days waking up early to pray to whatever god they
believed in and then spend the rest of the day studying the god and doing activities that they believed would make the god happy and have the god
accept them as one of his own. Most of the time it would involve the monk waking up at an extremely early time and going to sleep at an extremely
early time, with most of the days spent praying. It appealed to many people

Comparing Daisy and Countess Olenska in Daisy Miller and...
The story "Daisy Miller" is a romance of a love that can never be. The character Annie P. Miller (known as Daisy Miller) is portrayed as a young
naive wild yet, innocent girl who want to do nothing more but have fun with the company she please. The story "Daisy Miller" is a lot like The Age
of Innocence. In both the movie and the book the leading lady was shunned from society because of their behavior. Both Daisy and the Countess
Olenska were misunderstood and out–casted because they were saw as different. These women did not want to conform to what the society thought was
proper and good, they had their own opinion and was bold in their time to state it.
Daisy thought it was okay, even nice to have many gentlemen friends. She did not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She enjoyed herself and that was enough for her to be happy.
The Countess Olenska was much like Daisy. The Countess was a free sprit who did not care that society did not agree with her suing for a divorce.
She wanted to be free. She hated when everyone that she felt were so nice turned and gave her the cold shoulder. The Countess did not like being
shunned so she did give consideration to society's chants. She did not sue for the divorce but she refused to go back to her husband. Society was not
the reason for her actions although, considered, did not make the final decision.
Like every romance there has to be a charming gentlemen. In The Age of Innocence there were Newland and Winterborne in "Daisy Miller". These
two man were a lot alike and in so many ways so different. They were different because of their circumstance but also had different point of views.
They were both gentlemen and made choices as gentlemen should.
Newland was a gentlemen gentleman. He did not like for people to talk ghastly of The Countess. He felt she should make her own choice. Newland
was inclined to a woman being equal to and having equal freedom as a man. Newland, however, had a set of circumstance that made this romance go
for a loop. Newland was engaged to The Countess Olenska's cousin. The fact did not stop him from confessing his love to The Countess. He made the
choice to go ahead with the wedding, with the help of The Countess Olenska, just as

Why Do Peasants Live In The Middle Class
Life was very hard for peasants. Unlike the King and Queen, peasants would have to work. Peasants would have to work super hard in order to
make money but most years peasants wouldn't earn much money because they would have to pay taxes to the King. Even after that peasants would
usually have to work from 3am till midnight.Being the in the lower class made their lives even harder. Knights and nobles were in a medium class so
they got things like land, crops and clothes from the king for there family. On the other hand the peasants would have to pay in order to even enter the
castle that the King and Queen lived in. School would be very expensive so only the royals would attend. Due to that most peasants wouldn't have
many options for jobs

The Positive And Negative Effects Of Gentrification
Gentrification is a planned or unplanned process where wealthy individuals "displace" poor individuals from their areas of living by purchasing the
property and later upgrading it through modernization and renovation (Brown–Saracino, 2013). Ruth Glass coined the term Gentrification in her book
London: Aspects of Change in reference to the influx of wealthy individuals to poorly inhabited areas in central London in 1964 (Brown–Saracino,
2013). These rich individuals were referred to as "gentry" hence the term gentrification.
Gentrification has been a controversial issue both in urban planning and politics primarily due to the displacement of poor people by the rich folks
(Shaw & Hagemans, 2015). Many individuals have viewed gentrification as an illegal act that should be avoided at all costs. On the other hand,
another group of people believe that gentrification is the way forward to promoting growth and development. With such contrasting ideas, this paper is
going to take a look at gentrification from a positive and negative perspective, its effects, and how it can be prevented or contained. Apart from this, the
paper will also address the following questions.
What is the societal, public health, and economic impact of gentrification?
Does gentrification play a role in racial segregation?
Body
As a process, gentrification has had both a negative and positive impact on the society as well as affected the economic status of the involved countries
or towns. As a way

The Power Of Corruption And Absolutism In Movie Analysis...
Corruption and absolutism are ruling France. The movie well describes France as a big corrupted state where the poverty is on such a bad level,
therefore, the people of France are starting to realize that the king, Louis XVI, should be taken down. The idea of to getting France to change to better
is visualized through the main characters which are not trying to help just France but also the French people. However, the nobles are making it
impossible for anybody, who is not on their side, to even get a chance to see the king and the noble women have the power of corruption which is
shown in many ways throughout the movie.
The main character, which in the movie is called the Engineer, is a noble from the southwest part of France. He may not be as rich as the nobles
that live in Versailles, but he is honest, straight forward, compassionate, and pure hearted. He is willing to take action, he understands the poverty,
and he is seeking the progress of France. His family owns a property in the southwest France that is surrounded by swamps. The swamps are a very
good place for mosquitoes to reproduce and, with the poverty being on such a bad level, the people are starting to get sick and they even die. The
fever that the mosquitoes are transmitting is killing Engineer's people so he is going to do everything he can to stop it. The Engineer's plan is to go
to Versailles and talk to the king about drying out the swamps so his people will stop getting sick. On his journey to see the

The Feudal System Of The Middle Ages Of England
The Feudal System in the Middle Ages of England was not the best system of government to go by for everyone since it gave most of its power to
the King, and made it impossible for the lower class to improve themselves economically. People of higher rank expected the lower ranks of society to
pledge their loyalty to them and in turn, protected them. There came a time where everybody became tired of never progressing, and people started to
do something about it. The end to Feudalism did not just happen overnight, it took many years, a deadly disease and many angry peasants for the
social class to rise. First the nobles got the King to sign the Magna Carta, which limited the King's power, years later a deadly disease caused the
population of England to decrease by 1/3, and finally, The Peasants' Revolt which changed England forever. Feudalism first began after a collapse of
the Roman Empire, and barbarian tribes invading England. The social structure that became the Feudalism, consisted of the clergy, knights and
peasants. The clergy were the religious people that dedicated themselves to the salvation of humanity. Kings, high nobles, and low nobles who were
soldiers and meant to defend others. The peasants were the people who grew crops and tended animals. Some rented their land and the serfs worked
for knights and were legally tied to that land. Everyone had obligations to someone. This was the way the feudal system worked. As time went by
though, people realized they

Captain James Macnamar Trial At The Old Bailey On...
In MacNamara (1803), Captain James MacNamara is brought to trial at the Old Bailey on manslaughter charges stemming from a duel in which
MacNamara killed his adversary, Colonel Robert Montgomery. Interestingly, an examination of the trial proceedings demonstrates that the defence
focused on the defendant's honourability. Rather than focus on the defendant's criminal actions, the defence sought to counter the prosecution by
highlighting the defendant's actions in relation to another code, the English code of honour. In spite of a strong prosecution, the jury's verdict of not
guilty in MacNamara is reflective of the vast majority of English criminal trials involving duelists being ruled in favour of the defendants,
demonstrating the subversion of English criminal law by the code of honour in the Georgian period (1714–1830).
MacNamara (1803) On 6 April 1803, Captain James MacNamara and Colonel Robert Montgomery travelled on horseback through Hyde Park with their
separate entourages and Newfoundland dogs. The dogs, who had run ahead of their masters, attacked one another. Arriving at the scene of the canine
altercation, Montgomery confronted MacNamara, demanding that the latter restrain his dog. Sensing a challenge, MacNamara asserted his intention to
stand by his dog, accusing Montgomery of arrogance and disrespect. With neither prepared to concede, both parties agreed to meet later that day atop
Primrose–hill in a pistol duel. In the duel, MacNamara fatally wounded

Life In London, England In The 1500's
London, England – The Late 1500s
The Elizabethan era, named for Queen Elizabeth who reigned from 1558–1603, was a very relaxed time in England because no wars or conflicts were
happening at the time (Davis 231). Many people believe that all people lived wonderful lives in the Elizabethan era, yet most people were poor and
lived hard lives. "Undeniably the span of life is shorter in the sixteenth century than it will be in subsequent ages" (Davis 162). Important parts of life in
London during the Elizabethan era were social classes, living conditions, recreation, education, and gender inequality.
During the Elizabethan era in England, there were four main social classes: the nobles, the gentry, the yeomen, and the poor (Lace 42). ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Women weren't allowed to go to school or act in plays (Davis 91). "Women had little rights and were considered property of their father or husband
and not as their own person" (Davis 90). Rich women that had servants spent their time gossiping to one another and playing cards (Davis 91).
Although there were no wars during the Elizabethan era, life was hard for most people. There were four different social classes determined by how
much money people had and what they did for a living (Lace 42–46). There was trash in the streets and poor sanitation. Boys went to school while girls
stayed home and learned how to run the house from their mothers (Davis 91). People generally worked long hours during the week and spent the
weekends doing activities and attending plays (Davis 341). Generally the Elizabethan era was good for wealthy people and could be a struggle for poor
people (Lace

Compare And Contrast Social Class In 16th Century England
"Social class refers to a group of people within a society who possess roughly the same socioeconomic status." ("Social Class")
Social class plays a major role in a society. A person's social class affects his/her education, respectability, and ability to get a job. Most people in
America's society are born into their social class, but it is easier now to move up than it was in 16th century England. Although there are some slight
differences in these two social classes, the social classes of 16th century England are shockingly similar to the social classes of modern day America.
Specifically, the six social classes during the 16th century in England were Monarchy,Nobility, Gentry, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As for laborers, they were the lowest class in society (McKinney). This class was made up of beggars, artisans, carpenter, shoemakers, and brick
masons (McKinney). Although the work that laborers did was an important piece in the society of 16th century England, they weren't respected as if
they accomplished anything (McKinney).
As a result of these social classes, different ranks had designated attire that was regulated by Parliament ("Elizabethan Era"). Sumptuary laws
regulated how extravagantly people of the various classes could dress ("Daily Life"). The wealthier classes indulged in meat while the lower classes
ate eggs, bread, and dairy ("Daily Life"). None of the classes drank water due to impurity ("Daily Life"). Instead, they drank wine, flat beer, or weak ale
("Daily Life"). In the lower class, families were seen as working units ("Daily Life"). The son usually took after the father's career ("Daily Life").
Wealthier families had enough money to pay servants to do work for them ("Daily Life"). These servants lived with the family ("Daily Life").
Quite similarly, the five levels of social class in the United States from highest to lowest are Top Fifth, Upper Middle, Lower Middle, and Bottom Fifth
("Class Matters"). Four commonly used factors to determine a person's position in society are education, income, occupation, and wealth ("Class
Matters"). Programs are implemented by the government

Theme Of The Wind In The Willow
Pastoral Themes in the Wind & the Willows
Pastoral works refer to a genre of literature that focuses on the bucolic aspects of nature and the countryside. The English countryside represents the
ideal location for a pastoral work. One such work is the Edwardian children's story, The Wind in the Willows byKenneth Grahame. Since its
publication in 1908, the story has become a beloved children's classic. However, the story represents Edwardian society in England, and uses
anthropomorphized animals to represent Edwardian men. As a pastoral work, the events of the story occur in the English countryside, where the animals
work together to care for the wild one in their group, Mr. Toad. Mr. Toad's "Wild Ride" through he English countryside... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The author used the background of a pastoral vision to help elucidate the characteristics of Edwardian society. Mr. Toad is one of the most known
characters from the work. He is extremely wealthy and essentially bored with his life. His English country life does not offer him fulfillment. As such,
he jumps from interest to interest, quickly grabbing at new hobbies. As a wealthy landed scion, he has the luxury of this lifestyle. From the earliest
mentions of his home, Toad Hall, it becomes apparent that he represents the landed gentry. Rat points out his home from the river. "The stables are over
there to the right. That's the banqueting–hall you're looking at now–very old, that is. Toad is rather rich, you know" (Grahame 19). Toad quickly
changes his interests, spending the money his father left him. Rat describes this character flaw of Toad: "'Boating is out. He's tired of it, and done
with it. I wonder what new fad he has taken up now?'" (Grahame 21). Toad quickly takes up motoring as his new hobby. Motoring referred to the
hobby of driving and racing cars, something only the wealthy could afford at this time. All of this is discussed as the characters take a slow ride down
the river and then sit quietly in the countryside. An outdoor luncheon helps to create the image of the setting. The English countryside represents the
perfect pastoral setting, and the characters all seem to enjoy

Feudalism: Should We Work For The Serfs?
Feudalism makes sure everyone gets and gives what they need, making it an organized structure. The system made it easier to protect land and assured
everyone had a role. When the wealthier people can't protect their land that they own, a problem arises. Why should lesser people be the ones taking
the land? Enter, feudalism. The lesser people can now work for the manor and contribute to it's success instead of stealing other's land and just being
unproductive in general. Well, isn't it just a great day to be a serf? Instead of living your life for yourself, you now have to help somebody else live
their life (King, Armstrong). Serfs, such as farmers and bakers, would spend time working for the lord or for the manor in general. They received food
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These serfs were not just slaves. They all believed that through religion, everybody would be okay. So, the lord would make them work for the
manor or town, and in return he promises that the serfs will be safe. The church would also play into feudalism as they promised eternal life in
heaven. Isn't that just great? You can now work for somebody else your whole life with little to no pay and in return get a great life up in heaven; of
course only when you're dead (King, Armstrong). The serfs believed so strongly in eternal life through the church that it encouraged them Feudalism
relied solely on the people, and without the people's loyalty could not possibly be effective. In the feudal system, there is no dominant power or
central leadership. The system was controlled by local leaders who controlled military and economic power. The feudal system was a military based
system. Because there was no one person in power, the local leaders from different manors would compete to be the best. Unlike in other forms of
government, there was no one set of rules. The relationships within the society really kept everything going. Without these relationships, it would be
total chaos due to there being no

Feudalism Dbq
Document 1) A: The Feudalism provided protection and military services for their families. Nobles agreed to give their loyalty to the king. As the
peasants worked the land for the knights and nobles and which they gave to them was protection and a portion of the harvest to feed their families.
Document 2) A: The manor was a largely self sufficient system in which thelord's land was farmed by his serfs slaves bound to the land. The manor
didn't just include farmers, but artisans who had provided needs for the manor. The Serfs didn't have any freedom. For working 6 days of a week ,
they were granted one day to farm to feed their families. Feudalism basically already provide protection and military services to people, as long as they
had worked. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
B:
Document 3). A: They would have such a good appeal on people because do to that they wanted as in paying taxes to the church. They believed they
would get an everlasting life, and that happiness after their lives were short and hard. Churches had a hold on everybody who wanted things from
above and letting their newborn child into a life of God , and God's Church.
Document 4). A:The farmers handled this way in they had fed themselves since there wasnt any proper way. So they grew food in the fall , and they
saved some for the winter that way they wouldn't be going without.
Document 5). A: That you should follow by what these rules say, and believe in what church teaches you.
In Europe 40 was considered old, one–half of the children never lived to their first birthday. 95% of the population lived in rural areas where the
homes were grouped together for safety. The men went to the fields at dawn and returned at night. The feudal times had a series of manors that

Essay on Similaries and Differences of Feudal Japan and...
Feudal Japan and Ming China were two times in history within these similar countries, that have been around since ancient times. These countries
have similar and different traditions, a way of doing things, that have defined them as a civilization and a world power. The Japanese and Chinese
had times where select families or people were in control, dynasty, because of their ranks and their abilities, in addition their social classes were similar
in the way they treated people, and how people treated other people depending on their jobs and their status. There were the shoguns,a hereditary
commander–in–chief in feudal Japan, and in China there were the emperors, the ones ruling the empire (land), these were the people that were at the top
Within china it went the emperor, then local gentry "a term that refers to individuals who have at the rank and status of government officials, but who
reside at home and may not have any specific political responsibilities"(course reader 119), then scholars, citizens who were preparing for the exams,
next were Peasants, Craftsmen, merchants, and then just people in general. The Feudal japan ranking system went Shoguns at the top, then Daimyo,
the landholding military lords, next were samurai, and at the bottom were peasant. Being a peasant one would not usually be able to afford elite
education for themselves or for their children. Naturally the more privileged people in the empire's would get a better education then the peasants
children would have. This alone made climbing the social ladder a clear struggle for the people at the bottom. Japan and China both had social
classes that helped define the people of that area, the lower one was, was the harder it was to climb up the social ladder. These social classes had
specific orders that figuratively "put people in their place". These classes dictated what one has the capability of doing over and what one's role in
society is. The commoners had the responsibility of supplying food and other goods to people that were higher then them on the social pyramid,
getting paid little . The people that were at the top had an important job as well,

William Shakespeare 's Romeo And Juliet
George Edward Woodberry once said, "Shakespeare is, essentially, the emanation of the Renaissance. The overflow of his fame on the Continent in
later years was but the sequel of the flood of the Renaissance in Western Europe. He was the child of that great movement, and marks its height as it
penetrated the North with civilization" ("George Edward Woodberry Quote"). The Renaissance, as Woodberry stated within his quote, would not have
been as popular if it was not for William Shakespeare. He is a crucial part of the Renaissance. Not only did Shakespeare have an impact on the
Renaissance, social class did as well. Social Classes have been building for many years and they made a tremendous difference during the
Renaissance, to the point where the social classes controlled society. The Renaissance was a time period of rebirth and Shakespeare was taking
advantage of that by contributing a majority of his pieces of writing, as well as his plays. One of his most known pieces of work is Romeo and
Juliet. Shakespeare uses the idea of social classes and portrays it throughout his play, Romeo and Juliet. He generates various characters and places
them into different social ranks and standing. This impacts the play significantly and brings a new light and perspective on Shakespeare 's writing.
Shakespeare also illustrates the specific advantages each social class received during the this time period and within Romeo and Juliet's time frame as
well.
During the Renaissance, there

absolutism in europe Essay
Absolutism affected the power + status of the European nobility depending on the country in which they lived. In England the power of the nobility
increases due to a victory in the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution of 1658. However, in France, Louis XIVВЎВЇs absolutist regime
decreased the powers of the noble but heightened their material status. In Russia and in Prussia, the absolutist leaders of those countries modernized
their nations + the nobility underwent a change, but it retained prestige + power.
Charles I considered himself to be an absolute monarch in England in the 1630ВЎВЇs. A large portion of the parliament dislikes him because they
wanted more of a say on the government and because the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He built Versailles, a beautiful palace outside of Paris for his nobles. Lined with gardens and filled with fountains + opulent architecture + decorations
Versailles was a veritable playground for the nobles. There were balls, fancy clothes + huge numbers of servants, and most of the noblesВЎВЇ incomes
were spent on these luxuries. Thus, the status of the nobles was high and they were wealthy + lived an indulgent lifestyle, but they had no political
power in the French government.
During this same time Peter the Great sought to ВЎВ°westernizeВЎВ± Russia. An autocratic tsar who had absoluter power, he did not wish to share it
with his royal court. He moved the capital to St. Petersburg, and absorbed western intellectual and cultural trends. He forced all his nobles to cut of
their beards, and instructed them to learn modern Western dances. Russia historically had an autocratic tsar like Peter, + the nobles have no political
clout in the government. However, the nobles in Russia are huge landowners and had enormous powers over the serfs on their estates. This economic
power, b/c serfs were almost like slaves, made them wealthy + prosperous. Thus, although Peter the Great rules without the input of anyone else, the
nobles were westernized under his rule + enjoyed power over their serfs and economic gains.
In Prussia, a similar situation emerges. Frederick William, ВЎВ°the Great Elector",

Medieval Feudalism
Everyone gained and got something from feudalism, even Kings. In the Medieval Ages, Kings gave land in return for what his part of the feudal
system. All the land in Medieval Europe was owned by the Kings ("People of the Middle Ages"2), and the king would make laws, with ministers
and parliament (Macdonald, 30). Since there was only one of him, he gave land to loyal Lords and Knights to rule land ("People of the Middle Ages").
The king would give land to Knights, who would become vassals. The king even allowed peasants to make a living off his land which would take
place in for example a manor run by a Lord or vassal (Brooks 1). From the feudal system, Kings also gained many things. From the Knights turned
vassals, a king would gain military services from them ("People of the Middle Ages"2). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even the food between a king is different from a peasant, this showing their wealth. A king's meal could include stew, roast, and pudding, this was a
rich diet but unhealthy diet, with no fear of starvation (Macdonald, 21). This food was given to the King by the peasants who he let on his land
(Nardo 25). The king would gain someone to look after part of his ruling area but also protection for himself and his empire from the the vassal.
Feudalism had something to offer everyone economy wise, even Kings.
Lords and vassals were in charge of the land given to them by the King. Feudal Lords gained many things from feudalism. First with Lord, when
the Lord gives land to a vassal, he gains protection for himself and his manor ("People of the Middle Ages"). A Lord also gains wealth from food,
rent, fines, and fees given to him by the peasants on the manor (Cels). Whatever was made on the manor could belong to the Lords for he was
charge of the serf and the wealth. Besides from Lords, vassals also gained many things from being in charge of a manor. Vassals ruled over the serfs on
his land, which was called a fief and was given to him by the king ("People of

Essay on Kinghthood
Knighthood
Knighthood and chivalry. The terms are often confused, and often pointlessly distinguished. The term knighthood comes from the English word knight
(from Old English, servant or boy) while chivalry comes from the French chevalerie, from chevalier or knight. In modern English, chivalry means the
ideals, virtues, or characteristics of knights. But in actuality, the phrases "orders of chivalry" and "orders of knighthood" are
essentially synonymous.
Succinctly, a knight was a professional soldier. Professional armies had replaced the old "citizens' armies" of the distant past. This trend was reinforced
by the appearance in the 8th century of the stirrup, which made mounted men much more powerful and turned ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
On the contrary to this not so balanced father, son relationship, heredity enters the knightly class in the 13th century. The son of a knight is automatically
a squire, thus making him eligible for knighthood on the basis of his ancestry.
Men who were free provided military service, either personally or (if they were rich enough) using others' services. Thus, a man who held his estate
in knight's fee owed service as a knight to his lord. A more sizeable vassal, when called by his liege, would summon his knights and form a contingent
in his liege's army.
In the late 13th century, a decision of the Parliament in Paris forbade the count of Artois from making unfree men into knights without the king's
consent; interesting to note, the two men who had been so knighted were allowed to remain knights subject to the payment of a fine. Knighthood did
not become a hereditary class in England, and instead the knightly class (those eligible to be knights) became the nucleus of the gentry.
As a military institution, knighthood was on the wane from the late 13th century on. The end of feudal society meant that sovereigns gained a
monopoly on war–making, and the old form of military service owed to one's immediate lord became obsolete. Kings still summoned their knights for
wars, but increasingly they turned to other sources of manpower, namely mercenaries whose use became common in the 14th

Matewan Essays
Matewan
Ignorance promotes fear. The Stone Mountain Coal Company exploits the ignorance of its employees to maintain power in Matewan. Keeping
Matewan's residents fearful of their future, fearful of change and fearful for their lives, the Stone Mountain Coal Company retains absolute control
over the town of Matewan. Controlling all four social and cultural processes at work in Matewan, the company is able to extract the fear, work, and
"loyalty" they desire out of their workers. They are maintaining a feudal environment over their employees, binding them through debt peonage to
serve only the Stone Mountain Coal Company, denying them the freedom to search for other employers. The Stone Mountain Coal Company would in
fact appear ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The resident workers' fear and hatred of blacks and Italians and vice versa distracts them from their hatred of the company, and prevents them from
bonding together as workers against the Company. The Company uses racism to their advantage by promoting it, and further prevents unionization of
the workers by showing the union as something new, foreign, and untrustworthy. Unions are forbidden in the workers' contracts, so the workers must
meet secretly to discuss the possibility of one. Because they lack security in their jobs, the workers fear for their lives and creature "comforts." The
company promotes this fear by monopolizing housing, forcing workers to live in substandard housing and making sure that the workers know that if
they should lose this housing, they have nowhere else to go, no place else to live. The company completely controls their physical lives, an indication
of slavery. Keeping the workers in ignorance of their futures forces them to live in constant fear, allowing the company to easily gain and maintain
control.
Politically, the Company controls its workers using fear to enforce its policies. Employing two "feudal knights," or detectives, from the Baldwin/Phelps
Detective Agency, the Stone Mountain Coal Company enforces rules by cruelly instilling fear in their workers. Using scare tactics, such as throwing
people out of their homes, taking their possessions, and

Essay about The Virginian Revolution
Virginia's way to the American Revolution
Woody Holton. Forced Founders: Indians, Debtors, Slaves and the Making of the American Revolution in Virginia. Chapel Hill: University of North
Carolina Press, 1999.
In his book Forced Founders В– Indians, Debtors, Slaves and the Making of the American Revolution in Virginia Woody Holton tries to give a "В…
study of some (not all) of the causes (not the effects) of Virginia's Revolution." He argues that the Virginia elite were important as leaders of the
Independence movement, but were also powerfully influenced by other forces such as British merchants, Indians, farmers and slaves. Woody Holton
argues that the Virginiagentry was influenced by those four groups, and that the gentry was even ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The gentry of Virginia was not pleased with this decision, since they invested in the land and were now legally hindered to sell it. Other settlers, like
squatters, just settled there, but the gentry had to respect the resolution of their own Privy Council. So they started to petition the Council, but without
success. Holton argues that the Indians were able to influence the British government to a certain point not to allow American settlers to settle in the
Ohio Valley, because the British simply did not want to spend money for British troops that would eventually have to protect the settlers from Indian
assaults. They hoped to prevent a new costly war in America. The problem for the gentry was that В…"the Virginia Executive Council had no choice
but to void the hundreds of surveys that had been done for Virginia speculators and to put a halt to further surveying. This setback only intensified the
speculators' effort to persuade the government to let them have Kentucky and the adjacent region." But the British government did not repeal the act.
This caused many of the gentry's members who speculated for land in Kentucky to be displeased and lose a great deal of money. Holton gives
numerous examples of gentry members that were affected by these circumstances, including Thomas Jefferson and George Washington.
The tobacco growers are

Manorialism During The High Middle Ages
Manorialism was an economic structure during the high middle ages that consisted of a lord and his vassals who served him and his wife. The
serfs had more rights than slaves but they were tied to the land of their lord even when their land was captured by another lord. Unlike slaves, serfs
could keep some of their crops and maintain their own family. Cottagers ranked below serfs and were only given cottage and a small plot of land to
work on. At the top of the working class were freeholders. These peasants owned their own land and were not subjects of a lord. Peasants would work
the fields together as a family regardless of sex or age, although mostly men worked with the heavy plows and women wove clothes during the least
demanding seasons. The lands... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Sometimes the wife of the lord would preside over the peasants when the lord was away waging war, indicating some gender–equality.Feudalism
originated around the ninth century around the collapse of the Carolingian empire and aided in the rise of manorialism. During these times of anarchy,
people fought alongside warlords to seek protection from invaders. Invaders like the Vikings frequently raided villages and churches for silver and
food that severely damaged the Carolingian empire, which proved that the bonds between warlords and their followers were stronger than the bond
between the king and his subjects. Eventually, warlords became lords and their followers became their vassals through an oath and a special
ceremony where the vassal kneeled down in front of the lord. Under this oath, a vassal swore loyalty to their lord while the lord in return offered
protection for the vassal. Vassals would sometimes fight for their lord and help conquer the land of other lords, and help their lord become the lord of
other lords. In return for their services they were granted a fief, or a plot of land. Knights would often rent out their land to

Electric Co Ops Research Paper
Once upon a time there was a valiant, and noble knight who saved his kingdom by slaying a wicked beast.. Just like the brave knight, your local
electric co–op saves people everyday by doing things that most people do not know about.. Electric cooperatives commit themselves to improving the
community by recruiting jobs for the locals around them, providing power to over 11 million people around them, and also operating as an non–profit
organization.. They are embracing new technology everyday to improve the electricity products they serve.. A knight is a valued, elite member that
serve their people by fighting for them.. The electric company serves the community with electricity, and they fight for better, more efficient ways to
serve the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The knight helps his people like the local electric company does for us. He makes sure that they have everything that they would need to live
independently in this world. The electric company helps the community around them in any way they can, nothing is impossible for them to
accomplish. The electric company exhales hope and inhales inspiration. They also help students learn more efficiently, there are many scholarships
available to any student. They are willing to make the industry better for anyone they can. Some local co–ops may provide their employee's children
with a scholarship. They essentially want these kids to go to college, and they want to make the communities education higher quality by innovating the
schools. In other words, the electric company helps the community in many ways. The cooperatives main goal is to provide reliable and affordable
energy to the people that they serve. They run as an non–profit, meaning that they are owned by the people they serve. The electric co–ops help better
the community by paying for better roads and other things that help everyone involved in the

Social Class In Great Expectations By Charles Dickens
Through the Social Class
Society has developed the concept of social class, to categorized people into different groups based on economic, political, and socio–economic status.
This concept has made it difficult for the middle and lower class to succeed. Charles Dickens had a sense of writing during the Victorian Era as it sought
to represent a large and comprehensive social world, with a variety of classes. Novels during this time were made to be realistic and Charles Dickens
excelled at doing that and exceeded expectations. One of his most famous novels, Great Expectations was set in early Victorian Era when great social
changes were sweeping the nation. Charles Dickens's Great Expectations tells the story of Pip, an English orphan who rises to wealth, deserts his true
friends, and becomes humbled by his own arrogance. This piece, and a couple other of his pieces including one of his short novels, "George
Silverman's Explanation" and a poem classifying the rich, "The Fine Old English Gentleman" developed a concept of social class. Throughout each of
the three pieces, the social class is somehow brought up, whether that being a short snippet, or the way it can change someone throughout the
classifications of the social class.
Charles Dickens's Great Expectations was during a time where great social changes were sweeping the nation. Although social class was no longer
entirely dependent on the circumstances of one's birth, the divisions between rich and poor remained nearly

The Restoration of Strong Government Under Henry VII Essay
The Restoration of Strong Government Under Henry VII
Henry VII's relations with the nobility are controversial, but views of his success are subjective. When discussing degrees of success, there must be
criteria on which to judge the subject. In this case 'restoration of strong government' can be measured by a close study of what Henry VII set out to
achieve and whether he fulfilled his aims. He appreciated the nobility's importance in local governance and did not want to 'crush' them, but merely
control and limit their power, preventing rebellion and civil war. This essay examines the level of success Henry had in implementing his methods.
I agree to an extent that the nobility was the main ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He did this by rewarding 37 proven loyal nobles with the Order of Garter. This was the highest award of chivalry, but was without the financial
obligations of titles. Thus, Henry successfully managed the number of nobles creating a select, loyal, controllable group.
Henry had close interest in the marriages of the nobility because under the feudal system, his permission was required for marriage. In the Middle
Ages, it was common for powerful nobles to marry heiresses creating vast estates over which they had almost complete power. To stop this happening,
Henry "ensured that leading magnates and their sons did not marry heiresses, thus preventing the creation of 'super–nobles'. This prevented families
such as the Stafford's and the Percy's from becoming too powerful. He also gave the inheritance of many unmarried women to the Crown. In this way
Henry was really successful in limiting the power of nobility.
Henry, whilst respecting the local authority of the nobles, minimised their power in his central council. As Carpenter says, "the only men who Henry
really did trust were certain officials...mostly of gentry region." Not all Henry's advisors were gentry, but many were. Sir Richard Empson and Edmund
Dudly were mere lawyers and yet, tow of the most powerful people in the country in their roles as heads

Elizabethan Social Classes
Elizabethan Era: Social Classes The Elizabethan Era is noted as the golden age reigned by the Tudors more specifically, Queen Elizabeth I. Queen
Elizabeth was the only person who historians are sure is at the top of the social hierarchy but there are different variations of the next upper, middle and
lower classes. The basic outline of the social structure in the 15th and 16th century was the monarch, the nobility, gentry, merchants, yeomanry, and
laborers. For each of these classes, there were very specific rules for what they were allowed to do and who they were allowed to treat as a lesser.
Though the rules were very strict it seems that some of the common people had discourteous feeling towards the Queen, there were also cases where the
The monarch during the Elizabethan era was Queen Elizabeth the I she had most of the power to control her land similar to our president, though in
modern times our president controls most things the House of Congress is similar to the Lord Mayor of London in the way that they can give a
majority vote in favor of a certain law. The nobles of the century do not directly correlate to the upper class but there can be similarities found in the
amount of power they had due to the amount of money they had. The military is considered to be the knights though they are respected they are not as
high up on the totem pole as the knights. The middle class of our modern world is similar to that time period because it is the largest class but different
because in the 16th–century middle class got little respect whereas as now middle class is treated the same as any other person. The final class the
laborers, does not necessarily relate to our modern society because everyone would be considered a laborer but there are also poor people in our
society. The separations in our modern society are heavily influenced by the strictsocial class of the 15th and 16th

The Right Form Of Government
When Alexis de Tocqueville had begun noticing the way that his native country France had been slowly but surely moving towards a more
democratic ideal, he searched for a place where he could find solutions to hopefully benefit France. What he found was the United States. There he
looked into studying the prison system but instead found himself perplexed by the state of equality that seemed to thrive there. In America he
observed how "equality of conditions" strongly affected American society, and how the people lived (3). He saw that over the past 700 years events
seemingly beyond anyone's control had been driving the nation towards that specific form of government; not to the extreme of America, but
drawing closer and closer. He believed that eventually the rest of France would follow at least in the principles of equality shown in the New World.
There was almost no way to fight this force that seemed to bring equality closer and closer every fifty years. Tocqueville did not think that democracy
was the right form of government for every nation, nor was he advocating for it (12–13). He simply aimed to explore the way that democracy had
formed in America, so he could observe the benefits and the detriments to his country. Alexis de Tocqueville knew that in order to control democracy,
one had to develop the system of government for it; socially, democracy was an unstoppable force beyond control, but institutionally, it could be
regulated, and shaped to fit the needs of its

The Role Of Men And Women In The Regency Time Period?
The Regency time period was an era of great wealth. Both men and women worked vigorously to become part of the upper class. Marrying for
upper class women was the only way to gain a source of income (Hall). Women would even change their way of life to be able to marry into wealth.
A truth universally acknowledged, that a single main possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife, said Mrs. Bennett (Hall). In the
Regency time period, wealth played a huge role in both men and women's lives
The gentry class was rich people who owned land and were lawyers, doctors, and clergy (Sheehan). For this reason, being born into the gentry social
class was a special gift. The landed gentry got property by buying it with the money that they worked for and not inheriting it (Pride and Prejudice). If
a male baby is born into a rich family, he would inherit money and land when his father passes away. When theupper class had children they gave the
them a special name. For example, Baronet is the oldest son and has the right to be called sir. Also, Gentleman is a man who was born into a rich
family or a good social class. When being born in the middle class (landowners), they had to make money by farming (Grace).
Women had to change their lifestyles to be able to marry into wealth. To help the family, the daughters had to change their lifestyles (Sheehan). "A
truth universally acknowledged, that a single main possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife," said Mrs. Bennett (Hall). When the
daughter gets married, her father wants to make sure that the husband can take care of her and protect her financially (Ray 140). Some women
started marrying for money instead of love. A woman searching for love that cannot find a husband will then begin searching for men with wealth
instead. A marriageable woman should not have to choose between marrying for wealth or for true love (Hall). Charlotte Lucas marries Mr. Collins,
so when Mr. Bennett passes away, they will get his land. Charlotte Lucas also married Mr. Collins for the money and not for love. Mrs.Bennet wants
one of her daughters to marry a wealthy man, so when Mr.Bennet passes away, they will still have a place to live (Pride and Prejudice). Marrying for

The Manor System Thrived In The Middle Ages

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Andrea Christian

More from Andrea Christian (18)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Manor System Thrived In The Middle Ages