The Theory Of Leadership Theory

The Theory Of Leadership Theory
Chapter sixteen discusses various leadership theories which can implemented by leaders to achieve
success. The choice of leadership theory differs from leader to leader as they possess different vision
and way of managing. A theory isn 't always perfect in itself, it is the endless effort of the leaders
which makes the theory a perfect one. Two approaches of leadership that I prefer are Situational
Leadership Theory and Servant Leadership Theory. Among many theories I prefer these two because
I tend to practice those principles most of the time and I assume these are theories that I truly tend to
continue in a long run.
Situational Leadership is also called as Hersey–Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory. Paul
Hersey the author of "Situational Leader" and Ken Blanchard the author of " The One Minute
Manager" are the one who introduced this theory (Hersey–Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory,
2010–2015). The principle behind this theory is that every theory is not perfect in itself and the
effectiveness of the theory is determined by the situation (Kreitner, 2013, p. 472). One of the
important lesson that I have learned till this day is no one can be prepared for the upcoming
problems. Problems may have same nature but may be different in the way it has to be solved. For
instance: A Leader may motivate an employee by increasing salary but the same tactics may not
work for another employee. Another employee may be seeking challenging job which may influence
him/her to
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Leadership Theory Of Leadership
Leadership is a very complex and important aspect of not only business but life. Leadership is an
important skill that can come easy to some, but also can be a learned skill. Leadership has been
around as long as human beings have walked this earth. Great leaders of the past include Alexander
the Great, George Washington, Pope John Paul II, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Leadership is a
complicated subject and has had many studies done to help understand its elements and what it takes
to become a great leader. There are five major leadership theory classifications include, trait,
behavioral, contingency, integrative, and management to the leadership. According to Lussier and
Achua, "A leadership paradigm is a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking
about, perceiving, studying, researching, and understanding leadership." (p. 19). This essay will list
and define the leadership theory paradigms.
The first leadership theory is the trait theory paradigm. According to Lussier and Achua,
"Leadership trait theories attempt to explain distinctive characteristics accounting for leadership
effectiveness." (p. 19). Early theories on leadership were based on the belief that leaders were born
with the necessary characteristics required to be an effective leader. The trait theory paradigm
theorized that a list of traits existed that researchers could find in all effective leaders. Lussier and
Achua write, "Hundreds of trait studies were conducted during the 1930s and

Leadership Theory Of Leadership Theories
Leadership Theories Analyzed
Leadership is an influential factor in the success and failure. If an organization is failing, look at the
leader, not the economy; not the market; look at the leader. The movements and influence of a leader
determines the fate of those under her or him. The importance of leadership cannot be
underestimated. The importance of leadership has constantly been debated and a part argumentative
discussion. There is no one approach to leadership, however leadership theories try to make sense of
various approaches to leadership. James G. Clawson is considered an authority in leadership
theories. His Level III leadership theory is about managing energy, first in leader, and then in those
around the leader.
One of the most noted ways to manage energy is transformational leadership. James MacGregor
Burns defined the concept of a "transformational leader as a process where "leaders and their
followers raise one another to higher levels of morality and motivation. Warren Bennis Theory of
Leadership and Bernard Bass's Theory of Leadership exhibit the goal of transformational leadership
is to "transform" people and organizations in a literal sense – to change them in mind and heart;
enlarge vision, insight, and understanding; clarify purposes; make behavior congruent with beliefs,
principles, or values; and bring about changes that are permanent, self–perpetuating, and momentum
building." (Covey, 1999) This paper will
discuss two transformational

Theories Of Leadership And Leadership Theories
Introduction
In today's world, leaders are not defined by age, race or gender. They can be a high school
basketball coach, the shift supervisor at the local coffee shop, or even the President of the United
States of America. In as many ways that leaders can vary by appearance and responsibility, there is
also a variance in the ways that they lead. This case study aims to compare three of the more popular
theories of leadership. These leadership theories are situational leadership, trait theory and
transformational leadership.
Summary of Theories
Situational leadership, developed by professor Paul Hersey and author and consultant Ken
Blanchard. Their approach was based off of a 1967 article by W.J. Reddin called The 3–D
Management Style Theory. In his article, Reddin discusses the need to have different styles based on
the demands of the leader. A leader needs to be flexible in their approach to meet the needs of the
job, their superior and their subordinates (1967). Hersey and Blanchard progressed this theory by
introducing the Situational Leadership II model. Their model breaks leadership into four different
styles, and how a leader must alter their approach in supporting and directing their subordinates
based on a given situation. These styles are directing (S1), coaching (S2), supporting (S3) and
delegating (S4). The model also focuses on the development level of the subordinates by
categorizing them between low (D1), moderate (D2 and D3) and

Leadership Theory Of Leadership Theories
Leadership Theory Paper
Leadership Theories
During this course, the focus has been on leadership and the different theories of leadership. There
are either eight to ten leadership theories, depending on the source. Those leadership theories
describe different aspects of what it takes to be a leader and the skills and traits of people who are
considered leaders. There are two different sets of leadership theories. According to Cherry (2012),
when it comes to leadership theories, "most can be classified as one of eight major types." Those
eight major types are called the "Great Man" Theories, Trait theories, Contingency Theories,
Situational theories, Behavioral theories, Participative theories, Management theories, and
Relationship theories. Those eight leadership theories are similar to the ten leadership theories
discussed by Zigarelli. According to Zigarelli (2013), There are ten leadership styles that all have
useful aspects to them, and the more that a person learns about all ten theories, they better equipped
they will be to become a leader. The ten leadership theories are identical in some areas to the eight
leadership theories, but there are some differences. The ten leadership theories are the Great Man
Theory, The Trait Theory of Leadership, The Skills Theory of Leadership, The Situational
Leadership Theory, The Contingency Theory, Transactional Leadership, Transformational
Leadership, Leader–Member Exchange Theory, and the Servant Leadership Theory. After

Leadership Theory And Theory Of Leadership
Leadership is a state of being a leader/head of a group of people, organization, and/or country. Ken
Blanchard state that "As leader, we hold the lives of others in our hands, and these need to be gentle,
caring and always available to provide support" (pg.2). Every leader has different styles or different
ways of leading his people to achieve their common goal. This paper will talk about leadership
theory and will compare and contract each theory from the each other. According to the readings,
they discussed four theories of leadership, which includes Charismatic leadership by Jay A. Conger
and Rabindra N. Kanungo, servant leadership by Robert Greenleaf , situational leadership II by Ken
Blanchard, and finally the trait of leadership by ... In Situational Leadership II, ken Blanchard stated
"The leader has endured as an effective approach to managing and motivating people because it
foster a partnership between the leader and the people that leader supports and depends upon." (Pg
3). This theory focus more on a good relationship between a leader and his people to form a great
teamwork or partnership to have a successful organization. Ken believed that when that bond is
form between the leader and his subordinates, it brings about high level of development and most
people are fully committed to their work, which at the end increase competence in their work and
increase productivity. However it 's the responsibility of the leader to have constant adjustment to
his style

The Leadership Theory Of Servant Leadership
Servant leadership is a leadership theory that originated from the works of Robert Greenleaf in the
early 1970s (Northouse, 2016). According to the Robert K. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership
(2016), Greenleaf was not the first person to create the idea of serving others through leadership, but
he does hold the responsibility of coining the term, and applying it to the modern world. This
modernized theory focuses on the leader serving the follower, in a way that gives empowerment and
satisfaction. This is accomplished through the leader having behaviors of conceptualizing, emotional
healing, putting followers first, helping followers grow and succeed, behaving ethically,
empowering, and creating value for the community, which is ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Students differ in their maturity level, ability to learn, motivation, priorities, personality, as well as
many other factors that put them on different levels (Rajbhandari, 2014). These differences are very
obvious when it comes to being in the classroom and assigning projects, and observing that some
students need more help than others. It is relatively easy to label a student with the Situational
Leadership Model designed by K. Blanchard, P. Zigarmi, and D. Zigarmi. The model consists of
four developmental levels, which ultimately decides the leadership style to be either directing,
coaching, supporting, or delegating (Northouse, 2016). In certain subjects such as math or literature,
students are already divided by their level of development. In these advanced classes there may
typically be students that are not in need of much support or direction, where as other classes need
strong support along with high direction. With these divided classes it may be easier to apply this
theory, but when applied to a mixed classroom where there may be a few students in need of the
supporting category, and many students in need of the coaching category, how is it that you move
those few students into delegating, and the rest into supporting? When so many students need high
direction and high support, the educator will not only be spread thin, but it will be quite a challenge
to improve

Leadership Theory : Leadership Theories Essay
Two Leadership Theories Kendric Identify With. In another course, Organization Behavior &
Communication, the author of this paper was asked to identify his leadership theory, one leadership
theory the author identified with was the visionary leadership style. According to the article
Leadership Styles, published in the Wall Street Journal, visionary leadership requires the leader to
start the employee off. Leaders that fall under the visionary leadership styles, tend to give little
direction and let the individual that is completing the task put a creative flair on the project (Wall
Street Journal). Calia Robins, author of Characteristic of Visionay Leadership, states that all
visionary leader have goals that they share, the goals are as follows: vision, organized learning,
innovation, building relationships, and pioneering (Robins). Another leadership theory that I
identified with was the directive leadership theory. A completely opposite of visionary leadership
theory, directive leadership style requires the supervisor to set objectives for his or her staff and
make sure they meet objectives their supervisor set. According to Shawn Grimsley of Study.com,
the path–goal theory is needed understand the concept of the directive leadership theory.
The path–goal theory, is a set of rules that accompany the leadership theory. Coined by Martin G.
Evans in 1970 and revised by Robert J. House, the path–goal theory calls for leaders to thoroughly
describe assignments, things that

Leadership and Leadership Theories
Introduction Leadership is the acts of managing the company through organizational changes that
are projected to enable the company in meeting meet its objectives. Leaders are anticipated to carry
themselves in the right manner to motivate as well as, influencing the rest of the organization
positively, since they act as an example to the rest of the employees in the organization (Sheahan,
2006). This paper therefore analyzes the leadership theories and the methods and tools in given
situations while selecting the appropriate behavior of different leaders in resolving problems in the
organization. The paper also analyses the sources of power within the organization as well as
defining the relationship between the power and independency in an organizational setting. There
various theories employed by the different leaders in organization. The first theory is the direct
leadership theory; in this case, the leaders are concerned with the organization productivity,
outcomes, and efficiency. The leader is seems not to be concerned with the aspect of creating the
rapport involving the employees. This type of theory tends to work best in global organization, since
the employees do not directly relate with their leader. The second leadership theory is the supportive
leadership theory; this type of leadership is associated with supporting the employees, and building
a good relationship with them, so that they are positively motivated, this enables the leaders to work
towards

The Leadership Theories Of Leadership
Emerging Leadership Theories
Leadership has been an emerging topic, where over the last twenty to thirty years research has
shown it to be of critical value. According to DeRue (2014), the depth and richness of existing
literature has produced an array of important insights about leadership in organizations. While the
development of leadership is not just about developing knowledge and skills, it is also about it is
also about developing people's motivation to lead, their awareness concerning the risks and rewards
coupled with leadership, as well as their identity as leaders, and thought processes on what it means
to participate in the a leadership process. With that being said, the servant leader approach places
focus on leadership from the leaders point of view, emphasizing their attentiveness on the followers
concerns, empowering them, all the while helping them to grow and develop through
encouragement (Northouse, 2013).
Servant leadership may seem to be contradictory to the norms of leadership; on the contrary, this
approach offers a unique perspective on leadership. Servant leadership is based on ethics or the
morals and values of the leader who is concerned with placing their attentiveness towards their
followers not only on achieving organizational objectives. Although the primary assumption of
servant leadership is that if the leader can effectively empower followers, the organization as a
whole will accomplish its objectives naturally. Northouse (2013)

Leadership Theory Of Leadership Theories Essay
In today 's 21st–century world of business, good management is essential in organisations and that
managers have to be leaders as well (Samson & Daft 2014). The statement that true leaders are born
with important traits such as "intelligence, honesty, self–confidence...and appearance" is unfitting
but rather successful development of leadership is achieved through the transformational leadership
theory. This essay will describe the trait & transformational based leadership theories, on its
effective purpose and compare and contrast it through reasoning backed up by academic sourcing.
According to the trait–based theory of leadership, certain integrated patterns of personal
characteristics develop the ability to lead a group of people effectively. (Zaccaro 2007). Here the
word 'trait ' is defined as "The distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as
intelligence, honesty, self–confidence and even appearance" (pg 612, Samson & Daft 2014). Trait–
based leadership is based on the idea that people born with certain qualities and characteristics are
more suitable for leadership. It was achieved by identifying the traits of many leaders, both
successful and unsuccessful, and looking into their physical, emotional, and cognitive traits that
made them who they were. (Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. 2011).
By studying the likes of leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr, Gandhi and even controversial
leaders like Hitler, researchers interpreted

The Theory Of Leadership Theories
Reflection The first week's topic was the history of leadership theories that explained the evolution
of leadership theories in different periods of time. The leadership theories have ten theories. The
first theory is the great man theory; a leader must born to be, cannot change and make, such as
Napoleon, Alexander the Great, Abraham Lincoln. The second theory is the trait theory; leaders
should have characteristics and personalities such as honesty, self–confidence, independent,
optimism, responsibility and have interpersonal skills. They can improve, change and develop those
characteristics and personalities to be better in the future. The third theory is the skill theory; a
person who is a leader must have three skills, which are technical skills, conceptual skills and
human skills. For the technical skill, a leader should have an experience and an expert to do and to
perform tasks. The conceptual skills, a leader must have an ability to think critically and analytically
(cognitive thinking). The last skills are human skills, a leader must have an ability to work with
others. The next theory is the style theory that concentrates on what a leader does in organizations,
not on a leader position. The leader styles have three styles; an autocratic, a democratic and a laissez
faire leadership style. For the autocratic leader style, a leader has a power to dictate employees, have
a centralized authority, and limited employee participation. For the democratic leader style, a

Theories Of Leadership And Leadership
Theories of Leadership
Introduction
It is true that leadership and leadership theories in general, are not scientifically precise in nature.
For example, some may argue that going into an apprentice program have a higher level of task–
relevance education and/or experience in the field you choose. A higher relevance than a degree in
Liberal Arts. Thus, one must evaluate the apprentice program and accept the responsibility of doing
the apprentice work. A degree in Liberal Arts scientifically, is not as precise task oriented and
relevant to the type of work one will be performing. There are factors to consider when choosing a
leadership style. One will enhance their leadership their success as a leader if they would consider
the many different factors of leadership. Not everyone prefers to use the same leadership style. What
kind of leadership style are you most comfortable with? The answer to this question represents ones
natural leadership style. If your natural style is proper for the particular situation, everything is fine.
However, when it is clearly wrong for a situation, one will run into problems. This discussion will
evaluate the situational style of leadership and the transformational, transactional leadership
theories. The situational approach requires a leader to analyze and determine the right leadership
style. Some factors to consider are the leader–follower relations, the leader's position of power, and
the nature of the audience and the type of work

The first week's topic was the history of leadership theories that explained the evolution of
leadership theories in different periods of time. The leadership theories have ten theories. The first
theory is the great man theory; a leader must born to be, cannot change and make, such as Napoleon,
Alexander the Great, Abraham Lincoln. The second theory is the trait theory; leaders should have
characteristics and personalities such as honesty, self–confidence, independent, optimism,
responsibility and have interpersonal skills. They can improve, change and develop those
characteristics and personalities to be better in the future. The third theory is the skill theory; a
person who is a leader must have three skills, which are technical skills, conceptual skills and
human skills. For the technical skill, a leader should have an experience and an expert to do and to
perform tasks. The conceptual skills, a leader must have an ability to think critically and analytically
(cognitive thinking). The last skills are human skills, a leader must have an ability to work with
others. The next theory is the style theory that concentrates on what a leader does in organizations,
not on a leader position. The leader styles have three styles; an autocratic, a democratic and a laissez
faire leadership styles. For the autocratic leader style, a leader has a power to dictate employees,
have a centralized authority, and limited employee participation. For the democratic leader style, a
leader

The Theories And Theories Of Leadership
Leadership is being defined in many ways and by many psychologists. It can be defined in terms of
group processes, personality, power, goal accomplishment, and interaction, differentiation in role,
initiation of structure, and combination of two or more of these. Its involves various dimensions like
planning, organizing, directing, controlling. In general the leaders with the leadership qualities will
earn respect from other members of the team and they together follow the leader to achieve the
goals. And in general as taking into considering the organization, manger can be a leader but not
necessary that the leader could be a manger
Leadership Theory:
Among the various theories, two theories of leadership are discussed below to get a brief
understanding of the concept.
1. Trait Theories: The trait theory of leadership focuses on identifying different personality traits and
characteristics that are linked to successful leadership across a variety of situations. The different
traits are extraversion, intelligent, self–confidence, honesty, being smart; these are the factors which
help in creating a great leader. However, this theory was not very successful as it 's narrow in subject
who does not guarantee effective and efficiency.
2. Behavioural theories: The name itself tells that the theory forces on the behavioural approach
which has a relation between the motivation, effectiveness, and efficiency and in turn influences the
leadership styles in an individual.

Leadership Theories And Theories Of Leadership Essay
For decade's individuals, companies, and organizations have spent an unprecedented amount of
money on researching, molding, modeling and working to define what a leader is and what
characteristics make successful leaders. With all the research, there is not a quick answer or even
full agreement as to what makes an individual an effective leader. The definition of a leader is
"someone who can influence others and who has managerial authority." (Robbins, Decenzo, Coulter,
2015. P.370)
Research on management and leadership in organizations over the past century shows there are still
no clear definitions or answers about what counts as effective and successful leadership; the field
remains varied and argued. Actual studies of leadership began in the twentieth century. The early
studies of leadership theories focused on the person and their behaviors, currently known as
leadership trait theories and behavioral theories.
Trait theories of Leadership Trait theories of leadership defined as "theories that isolate
characteristics (traits) that differentiate leaders from nonleaders." (Robbins, et al., 2015. P.338)
Research on leadership began with a search for inherited characteristics that differentiated leaders
from nonleaders and explained individuals' effectiveness as leaders. Early research dating back to
the twentieth century was the beginning of the trait paradigm of leadership research. Researchers
have not been able to definitively state that traits alone define

Definition Of Leadership And Leadership Theories
Task no.1.1:–Sum up the Leadership Theories:– Definition of leadership & leader , shows great
influence and bonding with its theories. It is an ability of leader how he influence a group towards
the achievement of a vision or set of goals. Leadership is also about coping with change. Leaders set
a direction for future by making a vision of the future. Then guide people by easy mode of
communication with this vision & inspire them to rule out the problems.
There are eight main leadership theories are exist practically.
Great Man Theories:– This theory assumes that great leaders are born, They cannot made. These
theories say that in case of need great leaders, they lead from the front. Great man term was evolved
because in military leadership only male leaders were present on that time.
Trait Theories:– Trait theory shows similarities with Great man theories, In trait theories specifically
it has been assumed that people are born with certain qualities and characteristics. These make them
better leaders from choice. It also shows specific personality or behavioural traits shared by leaders.
Contingency Theories:– Stoelhorst and Peter (2013) said that this leadership theory mainly focus on
particular variables which shows the relation with the environment. This will indicates about what
kind of leadership will be the most effective? This theory simply states that no theory is universal
perfect but the implement of theories depends on the variability, it also

The Leadership Theory And Transformational Theory
What does being a leader mean to you? By definition it is the person who leads or commands a
group, organization, or country. What unique characteristics and attributes do leaders contain that
make us want to follow their lead and respect their authority? As a future healthcare executive, it is
important to know these traits and leadership styles in order to be successful in the business and
medical world. There are a number of different leadership theories, models, and styles that could be
useful towards becoming a successful leader. The situational theory, contingency theory, and
transformational theory are the three leadership theories that stand out the most to me. As a future
healthcare executive, shadowing these leadership ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A leader needs to be specific enough so that their staff can understand the vision and be fundamental
so that the staff understands the importance of the goal to the overall success of the organization.
After establishing the goals and presenting them to your staff, a leader needs to establish the level of
readiness of their followers. Is the staff on board with the goals and priorities presented? Are they
hesitant to follow your lead? Based on their response to the goals you present, there are four
leadership styles you can follow. The first is the directing approach. This approach is most
appropriate when your staff's willingness to follow is low and their ability to follow is low. When
your staff is hesitant to follow, it is important for you to lead directly and supervise closely.
Decisions are made by the leader and communication is one–way for this approach. Directing is
often used when the issue at hand is serious and changes need to be made in a timely matter,
whether or not the staff is on board. The leader must maintain a directive position to make sure all
objectives are complete. This approach may also be appropriate when there is a change in the
organization and personnel are inexperienced. The next approach is the coaching approach. This
style can be used when the staff is willing to make changes, but have a low ability to complete the
task at hand.

An Explanation of each Theory in the Taxonomy above.
There are many theories concerning leadership, and how these theories classify various individuals
and their particular style of leadership. Leaders throughout the ages have led in different ways,
shown unique attributes, and accomplished their tasks or missions in a way that many have found to
be one of a kind (Northouse, 2016). Leadership theories such as transactional and transformational
leadership have been used to classify many of our leaders of the past (Leadership Theories – In
Chronological Order. (n.d.). Other leadership theories exist and offer the same explanation of the
types of leaders who shape and have shaped our world. Here we will explore four of them which
are; The Great Man Theory, LMX, or Leader Member Exchange Theory, as well as Trait and
Contingency Theory. Great Man Theory.
The Great Man Theory became very popular in the 19th century (Leadership Theories – In
Chronological Order. (n.d.). The theory was made based on the behaviors of mostly military figures.
During this time period, leadership positions were held mostly by men, who passed their leadership
positions from father to son. This is believed to be the main reason for the name given "Great Man
Theory" ("Leadership Theories – In Chronological Order," n.d.). One thing to note is that Herbert
Spencer, a famous sociologist, said that great leaders were only a product of the atmosphere and
society that they both worked and lived in. The

The Theory Of Leadership Theory
I do not believe that there is such thing as a correct leadership theory, there I said it, I've been
holding it in an jesus does it feel great to get it out. Haha what I do believe in is awesome people,
people who treat other people great and treat themselves and their business, foundation or institution
great now that's what I believe in. So in the sake of great leaders I will be taking on prompt number
two and constructing my own theory by using 3 examples from the book and 6 sources that I will
cite properly in an MLA format.
The first theory that I would like to pull from and the theory that I personally feel is the absolutely
most functional out of the theories provided was the, "Psychodynamic approach." This theory
emphasises and I quote from Chapter 13 PG 320 in,"Leadership Theory and Practice." , "Emphasize
the importance of leaders becoming aware of their own personality type and the personalities of
their followers." This theory emphasizes the theory that according to
www.leadershipandinnovation.com describe as," The Psychodynamic approach to leadership
developed from the methods of dealing with emotionally disturbed individuals and from
psychological development of individuals. This theory works in the favor of the majority of every
human being on planet earth where at one point in our life we have had some form of emotional
disturbing experience in our lives, whether it range from us not accomplishing a goal all the way to
being physically or emotionally

Leadership Theory, Leadership, And Leadership Theories
Leadership is the action taken to inspire and motivate followers through guiding, coaching, and
mentoring. It encompasses dedication to followers, which fosters trust and commitment to the
organization. Leadership is also an integral organizational role that serves to unify the team, towards
a common goal and a shared vision (Northouse, 2013). Additionally, Kotter (2001) indicates that the
leader is essential to effect organizational change. Hence, change is the specific action that the
leader is responsible for. Greanleaf (2008) further identifies the dedicated leader primarily as a
servant. Given this definition, it leads us to a more in–depth conversation, concerning the leadership
theories. It is important to study leadership theories, because they provide a greater understanding of
the leader's influence within an organization. Because of the unlimited variety, I must narrow these
to the three most influential theories that have influenced my leadership philosophy. With this in
mind, we will further the discuss transformational leadership, servant leadership, and authentic
leadership theories. Primarily, transformational leadership is primarily focused on the charismatic
aspects of the leader. Equally important are it's characteristics of change and transformation because
followers "become motivated to transcend their own self–interests for the good of the group or
organization" (Bass & Avolio, 1990a, as cited in Northouse, 2013, p. 194). Transformational

Leadership Theory And Leadership Theories Essay
Oh, Ilie please don't touch this text you already deleted my links!!!
Leadership Theory
Here are different leadership theories. But before discussing leadership theories and styles, it is
useful to first define the term and then take a closer look at them.They will give you only the general
types of leadership because each leader is unique and has his or her own style. Moreover, some
leadership styles work better with different groups of people and in different situations. However, it
is essential find out and learn more about your own style and then start working on how to leverage
your style to achieve even greater results.1
The Leadership is.....
Fundamental Leadership Theories
Each leadership theory describes its best leadership style. Thus let's take a look on the most popular
leadership theories:
Trait Theories: Similar in some ways to "Great Man" theories, the first leadership theory which
assume that the leadership ability is inherent, trait theory assumes that people inherit certain
qualities and traits that make them better suited to leadership. Trait theories often identify particular
personality or behavioral characteristics shared by leaders. But this theory doesn't explain why
people who possess those qualities sometimes do not become leaders. Contingency Theories:
Contingency theories of leadership focus on particular variables related to the environment that
might determine which particular style of leadership is best suited for the situation.

Leadership And Leadership Theory Of Leadership
Leadership Application
Jesus Cabral
Brandman University
The author of this paper has been in various leadership positions for over 20 years. Some positions
held by the author have been team leader, Operations Manager, General Manager, and Director of
Operations. The author has lead teams with various degrees of education and from many cultures.
The leadership theories studied during OLCU 400 will assist this leader though experienced to
become much more effective and focus on those areas that bring the most impact and benefit to the
organization he works for. This paper identifies three leadership theories and that the author chose to
discuss and apply to his leadership practice at work.
According to the Business Dictionary, Leadership is the activity of leading a group of people or an
organization or the ability to do this (Leadership n.d.). An additional easy to understand explanation
of leadership is Daft's description: Leadership is according to Influence based relationship among
leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that reflect their shared purposes (Daft
2015).
We are all in due course going to become leaders; even though the core leadership theories relate to
the occupational leader, we find leaders in every household through parental leadership, community
leaders, accordingly, identifying how to become an effective leader in the real world will enrich our
leadership effectiveness, in order to become an effective, successful

Leadership Theory And Leadership Theories Essay
The basis upon which effective leaders are empowered does not always equate with placing the right
person in the position; in fact, the extent to which leadership theories merely provide an outline of
what is expected of a good leader is both grand and far–reaching. Just as a simple job description
only scratches the surface of finding the right employee, the overall impact of a leader cannot be
solely hinged upon the oft–inadequate specifics of leadership theories. Anyone can follow the
guidelines of a given leadership theory and carry out the compulsory specifications, however, there
are myriad more innate qualifications to effective leadership than what can either be taught from or
redeemed by a simple list of qualifications.
II. THEORIES AND LEADERS Determining what it takes to become a good leader – receptively
influential, compassionate, communicative, dynamic – has long been up for debate between/among
those who support various theories. Two of the most examined theories, which call upon the
inherent – and perhaps even genetic – aspects of leadership qualification – are the Great Man and
Trait theories. The former relies upon a patriarchal disposition, while the latter draws from a
viewpoint of such characteristics being inborn. Both theories conclude that leadership ability is born
not made; however, the Great Man theory presumes this is acquired from family pedigree, while the
Trait theory assigns a number of commonly shared characteristics that indicate a

Leadership Theories Of Leadership And Leadership
The first section of this report will summarise three guest speakers' presentations on leadership in
terms of their leadership journey, leadership perspective and leadership approach. The guest
speakers that will be examined include Peter Higgins, John Acklerley and Mumtaz Bashir. The aim
of this section is to identify the individual's personal viewpoint on leadership, by drawing out key
themes and to determine how they apply their approach in the organisational world they inhibit.
The second section of this report will examine two leadership theories; authentic leadership and
shared leadership, and how they can be applied to each of the guest speakers' approach to leadership.
The aim of this section is to select relevant academic theories of leadership to support a comparison
of the three individual's approaches to leadership. 2 Summary of individual guest speakers
2.1 Peter Higgins
2.1.1 Leadership Journey
Peter's leadership journey began through the self–discovery of what aspects of work he did and did
not enjoy, rather than a definitive decision to enter management. Initially, he set out to become a
Scientist, achieving a first class honours degree in Chemistry and then on to study for a PHD in
Radiation Chemistry at a specialist Cancer hospital in London. A few weeks into the course, he left
as the research mostly involved working in isolation and felt that it did not provide the short–term
gains he desired. During this short time, he ran the hospital social

Leadership Theories Of Leadership And Leadership
Introduction
The purpose of this essay is to identify and analyze two leadership theories in regards to how they
contribute to helping leaders, lead and compare and distinguish the difference. This essay will
explore 2 main theories of leadership covered in the unit, which are charismatic leadership and
transformational theory. This two theories are well known in the filed of leadership. This essay will
illustrate leaders who acquire these two main theories and how they used it effectively to achieve the
objectives and goals to become a great leader. Leadership is an important skill to have when being a
manager or even in your day–to–day life depending on the person you are. Leadership helps you
improve work production by motivating ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Charismatic theory can help leaders be more assertive; its behavioral quality is easier to acquire and
develop easily. The way charismatic theory can help leaders lead is having charm which is the
foundation of the theory, it's Appeal is valuable for rousing others, driving a group, or showing and
creating individuals, or being a trend–setter or a trust raiser. Charismatic leaders are prone to show
up when the social circumstance makes individuals feel troubled. (Jacobsen & House, 2001, p. xx)
This shows that charismatic leaders are adjustable towards being a leader in the workplace or a
social aspect being very flexible. The Charming aspect of the this theory can have constructive
outcomes on individual results (e.g., inspiration and self–regard, eagerness to go past desires and
participate in organizational work (Campbell, Ward, Sonnenfeld, & Agle, 2008, p. 556–568). This
theory can help leaders be more approachable and create an environment where both leaders and
followers succeed in the work place or the social side.
A transformational leader treasures the feelings and respect, the loyalty among their followers and
workers and emphasizes the significance of commitment with projects and group work. (Veiseh,
Esfandyar, Mohsen, & Vahid, 2014, p. 113–124). Transformational leaders have a kind of initiative
style that can motivate positive changes in the individuals who take after.

The Theory Of Leadership And Leadership
Introduction
Leadership has moved well beyond its humble origins of innate traits and skills. The effective leader
is now described in terms of a full range of leadership that encompasses transformative,
transactional and passive styles, each with a slew of subtypes. Where once this full range of
leadership was thought to be a range of extremes, with transformative leadership existing at one
extreme and transactional leadership on the other, a more complex understanding of leadership now
exists. This new understanding recognizes leaders who are neither fully transformative nor fully
transactional, but depend upon on a combination of behaviors that cannot be adequately described
by a single, static style of leadership. Adding to this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Styles of Leadership
Researchers have long sought the alchemy that results in effective leadership. In their search, they
initially found the Great Man or the traits and skills that result in a great man. They have since
rested on the notion that an effective leader embodies a full range of leadership behaviors that are
used as the situation dictates. Vann, Coleman, and Simpson (2014) offer a compelling description of
this full range of leadership behavior. Borrowing from the Leadership Styles Scale, Vann and
colleagues (2014) propose that leadership behavior is not monolithic in character but is instead a
hybrid of traits.
Democratic and Autocratic Leadership. Democratic and autocratic leadership exist on opposite ends
of a spectrum. Democratic leaders "seek advice and input from their followers" and "motivate their
followers by engaging their followers, listening to their ideas and treating both the individual and
their ideas as equals" (Vann, Coleman & Simpson, 2014, p. 31). By contrast, autocratic leaders
"concentrate all decision–making with themselves" (Vann et al., 2014, p. 31). Under democratic
leadership, organizational hierarchy is irrelevant, whereas autocratic leaders promote a strong sense
of hierarchy. And while autocratic leadership embraces a more Machiavellian–style of leadership,
democratic leadership blurs, if not

The Contingency Theory Of The Theories Of Leadership
1.0 Introduction
The Oxford dictionary (n.d.) defines leadership as the action of leading a group of people or an
organization, or has the ability to do the same. Kruse (2013) after analyzing a number of definitions
has said that leadership is the process where a leader influencing his followers and maximizing their
efforts towards the achievement of a common goal.
Throughout history scholars and psychologists have attempted to build various theories of
leadership by identifying and defining unique characteristics of leaders and their various styles of
leadership. There are four such theories developed. Namely, Trait theories (What type of
characteristics makes a good leader), Behavioural theories (How would a good leader act or
behave?), ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The theory argues that when it comes to relationships between the leadership style and the
effectiveness in achieving a desired set of goals, the preferred leadership style which is used will
very according to the situation. (Vasu, Stewart, and Garson, 1998, p. 106).
Locke (1999) has also explained contingency theories of leadership were developed by traditional
theorists who commonly claimed that leadership theories must be situationally contingent. Which
means that one style of leadership cannot be used for each and every situation, they will be and have
to be different. Locke (1999) goes on to say that such situations may involve factors such as
volatility of the environment, the size of the organization, the level of power a leader is granted and
the complexity of the task or technology.
There are three leadership models based on contingency theories
2.1.1 The Hersey–Blanchard Situational Leadership

Theories Of Leadership Theories
Theories of Leadership.
Leadership: What leaders do; the process of influencing a group to achieve goals.
Leadership theories are implemented in order to help increase the organizations productivity. There
is not one right leadership theory, it varies depending on the organization and what job need to be
done. Most managers use a combination of multiple theories depending on the job at hand. There are
numerous theories that exist, however the three main fall under early leadership theories,
contingency theories, and contemporary theories.
¬ Early leadership theories contain two types of theories; the trait theory and the behavioral theory.
1. Trait theory focuses on the characteristics a person has that would make him a good leader. There
are seven traits ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whether it's a personnel issue, an upset customer or a difficult vendor, good managers can think of
creative solutions to problems, then execute the solutions. Good managers are never afraid in trying
new things. They are the first ones to jump in and test the waters.
Collaboration: Good managers enable collaboration on projects and ideas that improves
communication and overall productivity.
When it comes down to the type of leadership being used, IMG managers do not use one style of
leadership, they choose a style depending on the challenges faced and the needs of the people
involved. The types of leadership style that they follow are Transactional Leadership, Charismatic
Leadership, Democratic/Participative Leadership, Laissez–Faire Leadership, and People–
Oriented/Relations–Oriented

Leadership Theories Of Situational Leadership
"Effective leaders need to be flexible, and must adapt themselves according to the situation." Paul
Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard
The above quote defines the core idea behind one of today's most talked about leadership theories:
Situational Leadership. The model, which celebrates a multitude of leadership styles instead of a
single solution, has been considered a transformative and essential new way to manage and to lead.
But what does it mean to be a situational leader? Is it always beneficial to change your approach to
leading the troops? In this guide, we'll examine the development of situational leadership, study its
core elements and discover the qualities a situational leader must showcase. Finally, we'll outline the
pros and cons of the leadership theory and examine its power through four examples.
1 Understanding the development of Situational Leadership
Situational leadership is a leadership model, which has been large influenced and moulded by its
early developers Ken Blanchard and Paul Hersey. In this section we'll examine the early
development of the theory in late–60s to 70s, before looking at how the leadership model has
evolved from the early inception.
The history of the theory
The human history has seen leaders who have had the ability to adjust to different situations,
changing their management style along the way. Dwight D. Eisenhower during World War II is often
used as an example and we'll discuss more about his style in the section to come.
In

Leadership And Its Theory Of Leadership
Leadership
Leadership has been around for thousands of years, yet experts are still unable to agree on a
universal definition. Perhaps it is because leadership is a complex, multidimensional concept that
continuously evolves. Nevertheless, explaining leadership and its theories and approaches is a
monumental task (Henman, n.d.).
According to Day and Antonakis (2012), leadership is essentially an influencing process. Its
effectiveness largely depends on leadership behaviors and followers perceptions, as well as the
context in which the influencing process occurs. Early leadership theories suggested exceptional
leaders are born rather than made. Currently, most researchers believe leadership skills can be
learned (Carbone, 2009).
Leader development is the process of expanding a person 's capacity to be effective in leadership
roles and processes (Uhl–Bien & Ospina, 2012). This development is achieved through knowledge,
experiences, and a commitment towards improvement. As mentioned, business environments are
dynamic and ever changing; therefore, leadership development is a lifelong process. However, the
focus of development will change over time. For example, emerging leaders might focus on
identifying the purpose of specific leadership theories and evaluating their appropriateness,
usefulness, and effectiveness. In contrast, seasoned leaders are in a position to polish their skills,
evaluate their approach, and refine their style to ensure they remain

The Leadership Theory Of Leadership
The concept of a class focused on studying theories of leadership is a novel idea to me. It is not
surprising though; people only began to define leadership at the beginning of the 20th century, so it
is a relatively young field (Northouse, 2016). Although I have always believed that leadership was
an ability that could be developed and learned, to discuss leadership theory in a classroom without
any actual application of the skills did not seem particularly effective. Especially for someone like
myself who is generally a practical, hands–on learner, I was not sure what I could possibly gain. My
initial thinking stems from the American education, where students are encouraged to be leaders
without any explanation of what that might look ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In an ideal world, one of my team leaders, either the attending or resident, would have adopted an
S1 leadership style that provided high levels of direction and low levels of support (Northouse,
2016). That rarely happened in my experience though, likely because most people are not conscious
of how they lead. Medicine is a very business–like field and we are often so focused on completing
tasks and interacting with patients, that we fail to evaluate our teamwork and collaborative efforts.
What happens when you pair a D1 follower with an S4 leader? You get a very confused and
frustrated follower, an impatient and frustrated leader, and a lot of time wasted on everyone's part.
However, I am happy to say that there were a few rotations where I worked with leaders that did
adapt to my skill level. On my second month of my medicine rotation, I was able to considerably
develop as a physician thanks to the guidance of my team leader that took the time to grow with me.
By the end of the month, I was practicing at the D4 level as I had gained both confidence and
experience (Northouse, 2016). Meanwhile, I noticed that for many standard tasks, my team had
moved towards a delegating leadership style (Northouse, 2016). Because it was such a gradual
transition towards this style of leadership, I never felt overwhelmed or abandoned. In fact, I

Theories Of Leadership And Leadership
Are contingency theories of leadership, or trait theories of leadership, more useful for leaders in
organisations? Write an essay demonstrating critical awareness of the issues involved
The role of leadership within modern organisations is a significant one in terms of its ability to
motivate employees and drive productivity levels up. As a result of this, a number of theories have
been developed that attempt to explain what makes an effective leader and how the qualities of
leadership are applied to individual workplace scenarios. However, it is not possible to analyse all of
them, so two of the most fundamental approaches have been selected as a focus. This is based on the
needs of the assignment, which is to identify the most suitable ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Yukl highlighted that the trait model reinforces the attributes that are typical of leadership and that
leadership comes naturally to certain people who are "endowed with certain traits not possessed by
other people," (p. 13). Clearly, this moves away from the point made above that highlights
leadership as a process. Instead, the trait approach holds that the ability to lead is limited to a select
number of people that have talents and abilities they are born with (Yukl, 2006). However, as Yukl
highlights, it is important to highlight that the trait approach is the founding leadership theory, and
all others since have attempted to build on this. It might therefore be argued that it is impossible to
base
The other side of the argument – which is process rather than trait driven – suggests that everyone is
capable of leading and the qualities that define it can actually be learned. Indeed, a number of
theorists suggest that this can be gleaned directly through observing the activities of leaders and how
they perform them (Daft, 2005; Northouse, 2010). This leads to the consideration of the contingency
theory which holds that there are more 'contingencies ', variables and contexts which apply to
effective leadership. The common assumption that leaders are born not made is perhaps, reflective
of how simple a solution this is, without

Theories Of Leadership And Leadership Theory Essay
EVALUATE ANY TWO CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP.
Traditional theories of leadership were more concentrated on behaviours and traits of leaders, and
how they affect subordinates in the workplace. Then came contingency theories, which took into
account situational/contextual factors. Newer theories have come up, which introduced the idea that
leader–subordinate relationships are individually different.
These newer theories are Contemporary theories of leadership. They include Leader–Member
exchange Theory, Implicit Leadership Theory and Transformational Leadership Theory. In this
paper, I shall examine Leader Member Exchange Theory and Implicit Leadership Theory.
The Leader Member Exchange theory (LMX) introduces a new approach to leadership models with
the view of leadership as a reciprocal interaction between leaders and their subordinates. It initiates
the importance of communication in leadership.
LMX deals with the ways in which the leader–subordinate relationship affects the leadership
process. The relationship between the leader–subordinate pair, which is referred to as a dyad, is
considered separately for each pair, because leaders behave differently with each subordinate.
Central to this theory is that leaders have different relationships with different subordinates which
leads to the subordinates being placed in two categories; the in–group and the out–group.
Subordinates in the in–group have good relationships with the leader. The relationship is

Leadership Theories And Theories Of Leadership
Leadership is complex and, comprises of many definitions and qualities (Grimm 2010). One
definition of leadership is 'a multifaceted process of identifying a goal, motivating other people to
act, and providing support and motivation to achieve mutually negotiated goals' (porter–O'Grady
2003). Back in 1939 Kurt Lewin researched to identify different styles of leadership. According to
his research, there are three major styles of leadership. Authoritarian or autocratic, participative or
democratic and delegative or laizzes–fair. These three styles remain influential today. According to
educational leaders.govt.NZ, leadership is about empowering, transforming and working together to
meet schools and 21st century (www.tki).There are many leadership theories and from leadership
theories comes leadership styles. the educational leadership model according to www.educational
leaders.govt.nz identifies four qualities that build a leader 's capability to enhance teaching and
learning outcomes for the school: manaakitangi– leading with moral purpose, pono– having self–
belief, ako– being a learner, awhinatanga –guiding and supporting.
At the time of this initiative I was in a senior leader role and part of my job was develop the
integration of e–learning into our daily class program. This initiative was lead by myself and the
school 's principal. When we first looked into this we knew that we needed to have students have
access to computers throughout the day. This meant

Situational Leadership Theory Of Leadership
When it comes to Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King, and our own President Obama, how did
they become such powerful people? What do they have that the average person does not? Well, that
answer is leadership skills. They did not know when they were born that they were going to become
big leaders, but as they were growing up they learned what skills it took to allow them to become
different from everyone else and become leaders.
As we all know there is no magic when it comes to leadership. You either have the leadership skills
or you don't. While it is a learned behavior that begins at almost birth and is strengthened throughout
your life. And the simple rule is that not all people are born to be leaders.
Situational leadership theory is useful and relevant in effective leadership culture
Situational leadership theory is the theory that not just one style of leadership can work in every
situation. Two scientists named Paul Hershey and Ken Blanchard came up with the theory. It was
first named Life cycle theory of leadership and then was changed in mid–1970 to Situational
leadership theory. When it comes to situational leadership theory we must understand that every
situation is not the same and that every situation cannot be handled the same way. You cannot lead a
group the same way all the time (Blanchard, 2001).
When it comes to situational leadership theory, it is the way that people respond to working and
being led in a group. There are some important pieces to this

The Theory Of Leadership And Leadership
Introduction to the Topic Organizations of any nature will not subsist without some level of
leadership. This paper discusses the nature of leadership, which depends on the effectiveness of a
leader; the specific personality characteristics, physical, and social traits that set leaders apart from
followers; and the characteristic of a servant leader. It also gives insight to biblical integration of the
concepts and the strategies for implementing the concepts within the organization.
Group Consensus
TheNature of Leadership Leadership is in an echelon above management in that there is almost an
aura about a leader that compels followers to want the same things they want, as opposed to
managers which get their followers to do what they want (Marker, 2010). Therefore, managers tend
to utilize power, whereas leaders can be influential. Good leaders also have a vision – both a
company vision and a personal vision, in which is instilled into followers. An effective leader will
also have an understanding of ethical issues, who and what ethical decisions affect, and how issues
should be handled. John Ferrell and John Fraedrich (2014) suggest that headstrong leaders know
that ethics contribute to employee commitment, investor loyalty, and customer satisfaction (p. 16–
17). Knowledge of these relationships aid leaders in being well–round and make leaders aware of
the consequences of the actions taken decisions that are made.
Trait Theories
Trait theory is one view of effective

The Theory Of Leadership Theory

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to The Theory Of Leadership Theory

Similar to The Theory Of Leadership Theory (9)

More from Alicia Stoddard

More from Alicia Stoddard (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Theory Of Leadership Theory