20. exist under a large umbrella organization. (For example, NBC,
General Electric, states, and federal entities).
BUSI 620
Questions for Critical Thinking 7
Salvatore's Chapter 14:
a.
Discussion Questions: 12 and 15.
b.
Problems: spreadsheet problems 1 and 2.
Note:
1. Spreadsheet problem 1: Use table 14-4 as reference.
2. Spreadsheet problem 2: Use tables 14-5 and 14-6 as
reference.
Froeb et al.’s Chapter 17:
a.
Individual problems: 17–1 and 17–4.
Froeb et al.’s Chapter 19:
a.
Individual problems: 19–5 and 19–6.
Note:
P19-6: Need to consider the adverse selection.
Note:
19–6: Consider with and without the adverse selection.
Salvatore's Chapter 15:
a.
21. Discussion Questions: 7.
b.
Problems: 8, 10, and spreadsheet problem 1.
Note:
1.
P8: Remember the firm has a limited capital budget of $2.4
million for the coming year. In other words, the firm faces the
capital rationing and should use the profitability index as its
investment criterion (pp. 637–640).
2.
P10: Use the dividend valuation model (pp. 642–643). “A share
of the common stock of the company currently sells for eight
times current dividends.”
3.
Spreadsheet problem: Change the present value coefficient from
1/(1+0.5)n to 1/(1+0.05)n. That is the discount rate of 5%
instead of 50%
Sheet1Salvator's chapter 15 spreadsheet problem 1 (p. 652)End
of YearInvestment (Year 0) and CostRevenueNet
RevenuePresent Value CoefficientPresent Value of Net
Revenue01000.00-1000.001.00-
1000.001200.00600.00400.000.95380.952300.00800.003300.008
00.004400.00800.004200.00Total Present Value
Sheet2
Sheet3
Sheet1Salvator's chapter 12 spreadsheet problem
(p.523)TRConsumer's SurplusTotal amount that consumer is
willing to payQ624933P41st DegreeTRConsumer's Surplus2
PricesTRConsumer's SurplusP15.5P24The
DataQP1401211028364452607
Sheet1
The Demand Curve
22. Sheet2
Sheet3
BUSI 620
Questions for Critical Thinking 6
Salvatore’s Chapter 12:
a. Discussion Questions: 7, 11, and 13.
b. Problems: 12 and spreadsheet problem 1 (p. 523).
Note:
1.
P12: You could use figure 12-4 as a reference (p. 492).
2.
Spreadsheet problem 1: This is the demand curve for Q=14-2P.
Froeb et al.’s Chapter 14:
a. Individual problems: 14–1 and 14–4.
Salvatore’s Chapter 13:
a. Discussion Questions: 8 and 10.
b. Problems: 12, 13, and 15.
Note:
1. P12: Need to calculate Herfindahl index.
2. P13: Use the internet search or other sources to answer this
problem.
3. P15: (b) A lump sum tax is a fixed cost, (c) a $3 per unit tax
is a variable cost which will cause AC and MC to increase by
23. $3.
Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of
Module/Week 6.
Problem Statement:With operations in more than 160 countries
and regions worldwide, 340,000 employees, and $17.9 billion in
annual profits - Toyota Motor Corp has been referred to as the
gold standard of the automotive industry. Toyota reached
success in part because of its exceptional reputation for quality
and customer care. In total contrast, Toyota embodies a culture
of smug, insular arrogance unable to properly handle a recall
crisis. The general problem and focus of the current case study
is Toyota's arrogant organizational culture and structure of
denial. The goal of this study is to examine characteristics of
organizational culture as it relates to crisis management.
Research Questions:
1) What is the relationship between organizational culture and
ethics?
2) Compare and contrast the transparency, efficiency, and
consumer trust issues of GM and Toyota.
3) How do organizational structures and models differ in
contrast to Toyota's?
4) What are the behavioral implications of culture and conflict?
These questions are only food for thought. You can change
these or add more. The goal is to stay consistent in research
tone and focus to the research problem noted above.
SUB-HEADERS: Not limited to, your literature review MUST
cross-reference and integrate a discussion on elements of the
case and the following topics: (1) Organizational Culture, (2)
Organization Structure, (3) Leadership, (4) Ethics, (5)
Understanding Work Teams, & (6) Conflict and Negotiation.
YOU MUST DISCUSS THE PROS AND CONS OF EACH.
24. Research cannot be one-sided or it is not valid and reliable.
My Parts
Literature Review
You must address at least six scholarly resources in this section.
Approach this section as a mini "book report" on each of the
reference sources that significantly informed your analysis and
proposed solutions. Give the reader an encapsulated review of
what information you found most relevant to your research. You
may have found conflicting opinions/theories related to your
topic area. Identify and discuss any such contrasts and/or
describe in detail significant agreement among your sources.
Your literature review should be separate and distinct from your
analysis section; it is a summation of your research.
Solution
s
Identify at least three potential workable solutions to your
problem and identify the pros and cons of each alternative
solution and its high-level implementation steps.
Identify your preferred solution and describe exactly what
should be done and how it should be done, including by whom,
with whom, and in what sequence. Always explain your
thinking behind your final solution set. It's important to be clear
about why a particular alternative (solution) was chosen, as
opposed to others.
25. Reflection : Think about this assignment and write a well-
thought-out reflective statement about how this assignment
influenced your personal, academic, and professional leadership
and managerial development.
CASE
Did Toyota’s Culture Cause Its Problems?
You may be familiar with the problems that have recently
plagued Toyota. However, you may not know the whole story.
First the facts. In 2010 Toyota issued a series of recalls for
various models. The most serious was for a defect called
“unintended acceleration,” which occurs when a car accelerates
with no apparent input from the driver. Investigations revealed
that unintended acceleration in Toyota cars has been the cause
of 37 deaths since 2000. When the problems first surfaced,
however, Toyota denied it was the cause. Eventually, Toyota
apologized and recalled more than 9 million cars.
To many, the root cause of Toyota’s problems was its insular,
arrogant culture.Fortune argued: “Like GM before it, Toyota has
gotten smug. It believes the Toyota Way is the only
way.” Time reported “a Toyota management team that had
fallen in love with itself and become too insular to properly
handle something like the current crisis.” Transportation
Secretary Ray LaHood described Toyota’s culture as “safety-
26. deaf.”
But is this the reality? Increasingly, evidence suggests that
Toyota’s culture—or even the cars it produces—is not the
source of the problem.
A 2011 report released by the U.S. National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) concluded that unintended
acceleration was not caused by problems in the electronic
circuitry. The Wall Street Journal wrote that “safety regulators,
human-error experts and auto makers say driver error is the
primary cause of sudden acceleration.” Forbes and The
Atlantic commented that most of the incidents of sudden
acceleration in Toyota cars occurred 537538with elderly
drivers, and elderly drivers are known to be more prone to
confusing pedals. Many other independent investigations,
including ones conducted by automobile experts at Popular
Mechanics and Car and Driver, reached the same conclusion:
the main cause of unintended acceleration was drivers mistaking
the gas pedal for the brake pedal.
There’s a long history of misreporting on this issue. Audi was
nearly driven into bankruptcy when 60 Minutes aired a report,
“Out of Control,” purportedly proving that defects in the car
were behind six fatal sudden-acceleration accidents. As it turns
out, 60 Minutes paid sometime to tamper with the car—filling a
canister of compressed air linked to the transmission—to cause
the sudden acceleration shown in the segment. Further
27. investigations never uncovered evidence that defects in Audi’s
cars were behind the incidents.
Does Toyota have an insular and inbred corporate culture?
Probably. But it’s been that way for a long time, and it’s far
from clear that the culture, or even the company’s cars, is
responsible for the sudden acceleration problems.
Questions
1.
If Toyota is not the cause of unintended acceleration, why was
it blamed for it?
2.
Investigations have shown that after stories of unintended
acceleration are publicized, report of incidents increase for all
automakers. Why is this the case?
3.
Is it possible to have a strong—even arrogant—culture and still
produce safe and high-quality vehicles?
4.
If you were the CEO of Toyota when the story was first
publicized, how would you have reacted?