SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 23
TOLERANCE LIMIT IN SEED
TESTING
BY-
ABHISEK TRIPATHY
04PPT/PHD/17
Definition:
Atolerance is the maximum difference between two test results.
When carrying out more than one purity or germination test, using
different replicates or samples of the same lot of seed one would
not expect the result of each test to be exactly same.
Such variation between individual tests of observations made on
biological material & to a certain extent is quite acceptable.
The difference is may be due to errors in sampling and/or testing.
The tolerance limits vary depending on:
The type of test (e.g. purity or germination)
The type of seed (e.g. chaffy vs non-chaffy seed)
The number of tests
The level of purity or germination
: Application of Tolerances:
The various tolerances used in connection with the
rules for seed testing are:
1. Comparison of two tests of the same submitted
sample in the laboratory.
2. Comparison of two tests of the same submitted
sample in different laboratories.
3. Comparison of two tests in the same laboratory of
two different submitted samples from the same lot
4. Comparison of tests in different laboratories of two
different samples from the same lot.
Basic Assumptions for Using Tolerances
• There are three basic assumptions to use
tolerances
(a) The seed lot from which the sample is
drawn should be relatively homogeneous
(b) The sample must be drawn randomly as per
seed sampling recommended procedure from
container or locations in the lot
(c) Bias must be avoided in conducting test.
Where to Apply Tolerances:
• l. Within Seed Testing Laboratory:
• Before release of seed analyst’s reports, a seed analyst has to
make sure about the accuracy and reproducibility of results.
Several situations normally arise in the seed.
• testing laboratory when tolerance should be applied to decide the
validity of the tests.
• Some of them are:
• (a) Germination test: To decide whether the replicate wise
performance of a germination test is comparable or retest is
needed.
• (b) Purity analysis: Comparing the replicate wise results of
physical purity of different components and to decide whether
the test conducted is valid or retest is necessary.
• (c) Referee Test: To ensure that seed testing laboratories are
achieving reproducible results, referee testing is arranged and
tolerances are applied to evaluate the accuracy of their results.
2. For Certification:
• (a) The Central Seed Committee (CSC), Government of India has
prescribed the minimum seed certification standards for various
crops. As a practice these standards are also taken as such for
label information, even if the seed analysis results may be higher
than the prescribed standards, the actual prescribed standards
are only mentioned on the table.
• (b) Competition in the seed trade based on difference in seed
quality in future is very likely. Moreover, the farmers' awareness
for seed quality measurements may necessitate labeling as per
the actual seed analysis report. Thus label information can be well
above the prescribed seed standards or at par with the standards.
In either case seed is fit for certification.
• (c) The seed standards are so formulated and prescribed that they
ensure a reasonable level of quality for the seed user and that
they can be achieved by a majority of seed producers i.e. it is
neither kept high or very low. Therefore, for initial certification
tolerances are not applied.
(d) According to the prevalent practice, certification is valid for a
period of eight months. On expiry of this period the certification
agency draws a fresh sample of the lot and sends it to the
laboratory .On receipt of results decision on extending the validity
period i.e. revalidation/ re-certification is taken. At present,
revalidation is done only if the seed analysis results are at least
meeting the prescribed seed standards without the application of
tolerances. But the same situation is being viewed differently for
the purpose of seed law enforcement for assessing the accuracy
of label information tolerance tables are used.
(e) From the above point (d) following points become clear:
• (i) For seed law enforcement, tolerances are used and thus labels
are retained even if the laboratory report is less than the label
information but difference is within tolerances units; and
• (ii) For revalidation/re-certification, tolerances are not used and
thus lot is declared as unfit if the laboratory result is lower than
the prescribed standards irrespective of whether the difference is
within or out of tolerance
3. Outside seed testing laboratory:
• (a) Seed law enforcement- Label prescription:
• Under seed law enforcement, the information given on the label
affixed/attached on each container of the lot may be above the
prescribed seed standards but under prevailing practice in India
the information about seed quality attributes given on the label is
the same as per prescribed seed standards for each seed quality
attribute.
• (b) Seed law enforcement-Seed standard prescription:
• The central seed committee has prescribed crop wise minimum
seed certification standards class wise for labeling seeds. At
present the seed certification standards are as such taken for
labeling, therefore information on the labels given as per
prescribed standards even though the sample might be recording
higher germination and purity than the standards. In other words
for law enforcement, tolerances are applied whether or not the lot
is at least equal to the prescribed minimum limit given on the
label.
Procedure of using Tolerances:
Calculate the average of two results to be compared(only 2 results –
purity test, 4 replicate results-germination test)
Find the average value in the first column and the tolerance will be
found opposite in the column corresponding to the type of test (e.g.
in purity tests chaffy vs non-chaffy ;or the number of tests) (in
germination tests 3or 4 replicates).
If the difference between any 2 tests is greater than the tolerance
shown in the table, the results are out of tolerance.
Use of Tolerance Table within and
between laboratories Test Results
• (a)How to Use For Purity Analysis Results:
• To compute the tolerances of the components
of purity analysis it is necessary to have the
information about the magnitude of variation
associated with each source of variation,
which affects the percent, estimated on a
sample from the seed lot.
Examples of Use of Tolerance Table for Purity
Analysis Results:
(i) To ensure accuracy in a laboratory, it is often desired that the
submitted sample is divided first into working samples.
• Two different seed analysts then analyze each working sample.
• Suppose purity percentages of the whole working samples in
two tests (by the two analysts) were 98.5 and 96.2.
• The question thus arises whether their difference is acceptable.
• To determine, this add the two values (98.5+96.2=194.7) and
calculate the mean (194.7/2=97.35).
• Now in column 1 of purity table 1 find the range that compares
with the average figure; it is 97.25-97.49.
• The tolerance value given in column of the table is 1.20.
• The difference between the two working sample is 98.5-
96.2=2.3.
• Since this difference is more than the tolerance the results are
not equal, comparable or acceptable; hence fresh test has to be
conducted by drawing another working sample.
(ii) Sometimes samples of the same seed lot may be tested by two
different laboratories.
• For e.g. one laboratory finds 98.5% pure seed and the other finds 96.2%
pure seed.
• To find out whether these values are within tolerance and acceptable,
calculate the average, refer purity table 2 and identify the range in
which the average falls.
• This is 97.25- 97.49 and the tolerance permitted is 1.39 for non-chaffy
seed and 1.63 for chaffy seeds.
• The difference between the two laboratory results is 2.3.
• Therefore it is out of tolerance for both chaffy and non-chaffy seeds and
the analysis should be redone.
(iii) The examples elaborated in (i) above relate to purity analysis results
reported on weight basis.
• Foreign seeds are also reported by number per unit weight.
• Tolerance values are determined as given above but using table 3 this
table can be used in comparing the number of seeds of single species or
the total of two or more species.
(b) How to Use for Germination Test Results:
• The use of tolerances with respect to
germination test apply to anyone of the
following:
• (i) percent normal seedlings seeds
(ii) per cent abnormal seedlings
(iii) per cent dead seeds
(iv) percent hard seeds or
(v) the sum of any two or three of these four
attributes.
• Germination tolerances should be computed
allowing for random sampling variation. Among the
many causes of significant differences between or
among germination tests are -:
(i) chance alone
(ii) variation due to equipment and materials
(iii) methodology
(iv) errors or inconsistency in distinguishing
between normal and abnormal seedlings
(v) fungi or bacteria
(vi) chemicals on the seed
(vii) inaccurate counting
(viii) non random selection of seeds for test or
(ix) actual change in the per cent germination
between tests.
Examples of Use of Tolerance Table for
Germination Test Results:
• (i) The germination test in a seed-testing laboratory is always conducted as
replicated tests of 100 seeds each.
• The numbers of replications are normally four; for official evaluations such
as in seed law enforcement work, the replications may be three; and for
service sample it may be two.
• For working out the mean it is necessary that results of the replicated
analysis are reliable and within the acceptable tolerance limits.
• For example, if the four replications showed germination percentage
(Normal seedlings) as- 90, 92, 93 and 83; the average worked out to be the
90 percent.
• In germination table 1 column 1, locate the range in which the average
percent germination value of 90 falls.
• It is (89-90). The maximum tolerance permitted amongst replicates in
column 3, is 12.
• The maximum difference between these replicates is 93-85=8.
• Thus the difference between the replicates is within the tolerance limits
and therefore the results of the test are acceptable for adding and working
out the average.
(ii) Tolerance table-4 is used when two series of replicated
tests are made on a sample; for example, for a seed lot
the first test replicates averages 85% and the second test
replicate averages 89%.
• The average of these two independent tests would
be 87%, while the difference between the average of the
two series of tests is 89-85=4 %. In table- 5, column 1,
the average percent germination of 87% falls in the
range 85-90%.
• The tolerance permitted here is 5, the difference
between the average of the two series of tests is only 4;
the results are hence within tolerance and therefore, the
average of two tests can be reported.
• If the difference would have been otherwise then one
more test should be made.
Importance:
It is important to mention here that the tolerances should not
be confused with allowances (permissible limits) for labeling
of seeds.
The tolerances are provided to take care of the unavoidable
variation in seed testing results and they are not to be
applied prior to labeling by adding them to the results found
by test.
The tolerance should never be used for the purpose of
permitting labelling to show higher quality than is actually
found by the test.
Tolerance limit in seed testing

More Related Content

What's hot

Seed and seed technology
Seed and seed technologySeed and seed technology
Seed and seed technologyRoshan Parihar
 
Maintenance breeding
Maintenance breedingMaintenance breeding
Maintenance breedingPawan Nagar
 
Floral biology and crossing techniques in groundnut
Floral biology and crossing techniques in groundnutFloral biology and crossing techniques in groundnut
Floral biology and crossing techniques in groundnutManjappa Ganiger
 
Seed certification
Seed certificationSeed certification
Seed certificationsidjena70
 
principles of seed production
principles of seed productionprinciples of seed production
principles of seed productionHARISH J
 
HANDLING OF SEGREGATING GENERATIONS
HANDLING OF SEGREGATING GENERATIONSHANDLING OF SEGREGATING GENERATIONS
HANDLING OF SEGREGATING GENERATIONSsubhashB10
 
Seed sampling and testing
Seed sampling and testingSeed sampling and testing
Seed sampling and testingDileepSattaru
 
Classes of seeds
Classes of seedsClasses of seeds
Classes of seedsVinod Pawar
 
Classes of Seeds
Classes of SeedsClasses of Seeds
Classes of SeedsFinOnseT
 
Introduction to seed and seed technology
Introduction to seed and seed technologyIntroduction to seed and seed technology
Introduction to seed and seed technologyNSStudents
 
BREEDING METHODS FOR ASEXUALLY PROPAGATED SPECIES
BREEDING METHODS FOR ASEXUALLY PROPAGATED SPECIES BREEDING METHODS FOR ASEXUALLY PROPAGATED SPECIES
BREEDING METHODS FOR ASEXUALLY PROPAGATED SPECIES Naveen Kumar
 
Definitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakist
Definitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakistDefinitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakist
Definitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakistsudha2555
 
Varietal identification through grow out test
Varietal identification through grow out testVarietal identification through grow out test
Varietal identification through grow out testCutm paralakhemundi
 
release and notification of variety in india
release and notification of variety in indiarelease and notification of variety in india
release and notification of variety in indiaMahammed Faizan
 
Quality seed production
Quality seed productionQuality seed production
Quality seed productionsidjena70
 
Selfing and crossing techniques in crop plants and Breeders Kit
Selfing and crossing techniques in crop plants and Breeders KitSelfing and crossing techniques in crop plants and Breeders Kit
Selfing and crossing techniques in crop plants and Breeders KitRajendragouda Patil
 
Presentation on Breeding Techniques of Mustard and Rapeseed
Presentation on Breeding Techniques of Mustard and RapeseedPresentation on Breeding Techniques of Mustard and Rapeseed
Presentation on Breeding Techniques of Mustard and RapeseedDr. Kaushik Kumar Panigrahi
 

What's hot (20)

Seed and seed technology
Seed and seed technologySeed and seed technology
Seed and seed technology
 
Maintenance breeding
Maintenance breedingMaintenance breeding
Maintenance breeding
 
Floral biology and crossing techniques in groundnut
Floral biology and crossing techniques in groundnutFloral biology and crossing techniques in groundnut
Floral biology and crossing techniques in groundnut
 
Seed certification
Seed certificationSeed certification
Seed certification
 
principles of seed production
principles of seed productionprinciples of seed production
principles of seed production
 
HANDLING OF SEGREGATING GENERATIONS
HANDLING OF SEGREGATING GENERATIONSHANDLING OF SEGREGATING GENERATIONS
HANDLING OF SEGREGATING GENERATIONS
 
Hybrid Maize seed Production
Hybrid Maize seed ProductionHybrid Maize seed Production
Hybrid Maize seed Production
 
Inbred line
Inbred lineInbred line
Inbred line
 
Seed sampling and testing
Seed sampling and testingSeed sampling and testing
Seed sampling and testing
 
Classes of seeds
Classes of seedsClasses of seeds
Classes of seeds
 
Classes of Seeds
Classes of SeedsClasses of Seeds
Classes of Seeds
 
Introduction to seed and seed technology
Introduction to seed and seed technologyIntroduction to seed and seed technology
Introduction to seed and seed technology
 
BREEDING METHODS FOR ASEXUALLY PROPAGATED SPECIES
BREEDING METHODS FOR ASEXUALLY PROPAGATED SPECIES BREEDING METHODS FOR ASEXUALLY PROPAGATED SPECIES
BREEDING METHODS FOR ASEXUALLY PROPAGATED SPECIES
 
Definitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakist
Definitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakistDefinitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakist
Definitions, variety production release and notification in india and pakist
 
Varietal identification through grow out test
Varietal identification through grow out testVarietal identification through grow out test
Varietal identification through grow out test
 
release and notification of variety in india
release and notification of variety in indiarelease and notification of variety in india
release and notification of variety in india
 
Quality seed production
Quality seed productionQuality seed production
Quality seed production
 
Selfing and crossing techniques in crop plants and Breeders Kit
Selfing and crossing techniques in crop plants and Breeders KitSelfing and crossing techniques in crop plants and Breeders Kit
Selfing and crossing techniques in crop plants and Breeders Kit
 
Presentation on Breeding Techniques of Mustard and Rapeseed
Presentation on Breeding Techniques of Mustard and RapeseedPresentation on Breeding Techniques of Mustard and Rapeseed
Presentation on Breeding Techniques of Mustard and Rapeseed
 
Breeding for Insect Resistance
Breeding for Insect ResistanceBreeding for Insect Resistance
Breeding for Insect Resistance
 

Similar to Tolerance limit in seed testing

Variability in seed testing results
Variability in seed testing resultsVariability in seed testing results
Variability in seed testing resultsUSHA
 
Validation of qualitative lab test methods
Validation of qualitative lab test  methods Validation of qualitative lab test  methods
Validation of qualitative lab test methods Mostafa Mahmoud
 
Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods
Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods
Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods Mostafa Mahmoud
 
No Two Potency Tests Are The Same
No Two Potency Tests Are The SameNo Two Potency Tests Are The Same
No Two Potency Tests Are The Samegsetton
 
Handling and retention of
Handling and retention ofHandling and retention of
Handling and retention ofNagendra SR
 
02 designing of experiments and analysis of data in plant genetic resource ma...
02 designing of experiments and analysis of data in plant genetic resource ma...02 designing of experiments and analysis of data in plant genetic resource ma...
02 designing of experiments and analysis of data in plant genetic resource ma...Indranil Bhattacharjee
 
1_GTobin_Qualification-Standards-Controls-Reagents_GT.pdf
1_GTobin_Qualification-Standards-Controls-Reagents_GT.pdf1_GTobin_Qualification-Standards-Controls-Reagents_GT.pdf
1_GTobin_Qualification-Standards-Controls-Reagents_GT.pdfaibn1
 
Dissolution-Method validation _ppt_slide
Dissolution-Method validation _ppt_slideDissolution-Method validation _ppt_slide
Dissolution-Method validation _ppt_slideBhanu Prakash N
 
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION (PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY).pdf
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION (PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY).pdfANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION (PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY).pdf
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION (PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY).pdfBALASUNDARESAN M
 
Clinical lab-method validation.ppt
Clinical lab-method validation.pptClinical lab-method validation.ppt
Clinical lab-method validation.pptDovMurtazaHashmi
 
Seed testing and sampling
Seed testing and samplingSeed testing and sampling
Seed testing and samplingAnshul Phaugat
 
QMS Seminar.pptx
QMS Seminar.pptxQMS Seminar.pptx
QMS Seminar.pptxRohitKoli29
 
Contoh Protokol Validasi Metode Analisis Mikrobiologi #1
Contoh Protokol Validasi Metode Analisis Mikrobiologi #1Contoh Protokol Validasi Metode Analisis Mikrobiologi #1
Contoh Protokol Validasi Metode Analisis Mikrobiologi #1Guide_Consulting
 

Similar to Tolerance limit in seed testing (20)

Variability in seed testing results
Variability in seed testing resultsVariability in seed testing results
Variability in seed testing results
 
Validation of qualitative lab test methods
Validation of qualitative lab test  methods Validation of qualitative lab test  methods
Validation of qualitative lab test methods
 
Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods
Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods
Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods
 
Bioanalytical method validation usfda
Bioanalytical method validation usfdaBioanalytical method validation usfda
Bioanalytical method validation usfda
 
Presentation1.pptx
Presentation1.pptxPresentation1.pptx
Presentation1.pptx
 
No Two Potency Tests Are The Same
No Two Potency Tests Are The SameNo Two Potency Tests Are The Same
No Two Potency Tests Are The Same
 
Handling and retention of
Handling and retention ofHandling and retention of
Handling and retention of
 
Why test blend uniformity
Why test blend uniformityWhy test blend uniformity
Why test blend uniformity
 
02 designing of experiments and analysis of data in plant genetic resource ma...
02 designing of experiments and analysis of data in plant genetic resource ma...02 designing of experiments and analysis of data in plant genetic resource ma...
02 designing of experiments and analysis of data in plant genetic resource ma...
 
1_GTobin_Qualification-Standards-Controls-Reagents_GT.pdf
1_GTobin_Qualification-Standards-Controls-Reagents_GT.pdf1_GTobin_Qualification-Standards-Controls-Reagents_GT.pdf
1_GTobin_Qualification-Standards-Controls-Reagents_GT.pdf
 
Bioanalytical method validation emea
Bioanalytical method validation emeaBioanalytical method validation emea
Bioanalytical method validation emea
 
5.9ILC PT single lecture.ppt
5.9ILC PT single lecture.ppt5.9ILC PT single lecture.ppt
5.9ILC PT single lecture.ppt
 
Dissolution-Method validation _ppt_slide
Dissolution-Method validation _ppt_slideDissolution-Method validation _ppt_slide
Dissolution-Method validation _ppt_slide
 
Analytical Method Validation
Analytical Method ValidationAnalytical Method Validation
Analytical Method Validation
 
Seed sampling
Seed samplingSeed sampling
Seed sampling
 
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION (PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY).pdf
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION (PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY).pdfANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION (PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY).pdf
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION (PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY).pdf
 
Clinical lab-method validation.ppt
Clinical lab-method validation.pptClinical lab-method validation.ppt
Clinical lab-method validation.ppt
 
Seed testing and sampling
Seed testing and samplingSeed testing and sampling
Seed testing and sampling
 
QMS Seminar.pptx
QMS Seminar.pptxQMS Seminar.pptx
QMS Seminar.pptx
 
Contoh Protokol Validasi Metode Analisis Mikrobiologi #1
Contoh Protokol Validasi Metode Analisis Mikrobiologi #1Contoh Protokol Validasi Metode Analisis Mikrobiologi #1
Contoh Protokol Validasi Metode Analisis Mikrobiologi #1
 

Recently uploaded

Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Disha Kariya
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfAdmir Softic
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docxPoojaSen20
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptRamjanShidvankar
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxAreebaZafar22
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Shubhangi Sonawane
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterMateoGardella
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17Celine George
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 

Tolerance limit in seed testing

  • 1. TOLERANCE LIMIT IN SEED TESTING BY- ABHISEK TRIPATHY 04PPT/PHD/17
  • 2. Definition: Atolerance is the maximum difference between two test results. When carrying out more than one purity or germination test, using different replicates or samples of the same lot of seed one would not expect the result of each test to be exactly same. Such variation between individual tests of observations made on biological material & to a certain extent is quite acceptable. The difference is may be due to errors in sampling and/or testing.
  • 3. The tolerance limits vary depending on: The type of test (e.g. purity or germination) The type of seed (e.g. chaffy vs non-chaffy seed) The number of tests The level of purity or germination
  • 4. : Application of Tolerances: The various tolerances used in connection with the rules for seed testing are: 1. Comparison of two tests of the same submitted sample in the laboratory. 2. Comparison of two tests of the same submitted sample in different laboratories. 3. Comparison of two tests in the same laboratory of two different submitted samples from the same lot 4. Comparison of tests in different laboratories of two different samples from the same lot.
  • 5. Basic Assumptions for Using Tolerances • There are three basic assumptions to use tolerances (a) The seed lot from which the sample is drawn should be relatively homogeneous (b) The sample must be drawn randomly as per seed sampling recommended procedure from container or locations in the lot (c) Bias must be avoided in conducting test.
  • 6. Where to Apply Tolerances: • l. Within Seed Testing Laboratory: • Before release of seed analyst’s reports, a seed analyst has to make sure about the accuracy and reproducibility of results. Several situations normally arise in the seed. • testing laboratory when tolerance should be applied to decide the validity of the tests. • Some of them are: • (a) Germination test: To decide whether the replicate wise performance of a germination test is comparable or retest is needed. • (b) Purity analysis: Comparing the replicate wise results of physical purity of different components and to decide whether the test conducted is valid or retest is necessary. • (c) Referee Test: To ensure that seed testing laboratories are achieving reproducible results, referee testing is arranged and tolerances are applied to evaluate the accuracy of their results.
  • 7. 2. For Certification: • (a) The Central Seed Committee (CSC), Government of India has prescribed the minimum seed certification standards for various crops. As a practice these standards are also taken as such for label information, even if the seed analysis results may be higher than the prescribed standards, the actual prescribed standards are only mentioned on the table. • (b) Competition in the seed trade based on difference in seed quality in future is very likely. Moreover, the farmers' awareness for seed quality measurements may necessitate labeling as per the actual seed analysis report. Thus label information can be well above the prescribed seed standards or at par with the standards. In either case seed is fit for certification. • (c) The seed standards are so formulated and prescribed that they ensure a reasonable level of quality for the seed user and that they can be achieved by a majority of seed producers i.e. it is neither kept high or very low. Therefore, for initial certification tolerances are not applied.
  • 8. (d) According to the prevalent practice, certification is valid for a period of eight months. On expiry of this period the certification agency draws a fresh sample of the lot and sends it to the laboratory .On receipt of results decision on extending the validity period i.e. revalidation/ re-certification is taken. At present, revalidation is done only if the seed analysis results are at least meeting the prescribed seed standards without the application of tolerances. But the same situation is being viewed differently for the purpose of seed law enforcement for assessing the accuracy of label information tolerance tables are used. (e) From the above point (d) following points become clear: • (i) For seed law enforcement, tolerances are used and thus labels are retained even if the laboratory report is less than the label information but difference is within tolerances units; and • (ii) For revalidation/re-certification, tolerances are not used and thus lot is declared as unfit if the laboratory result is lower than the prescribed standards irrespective of whether the difference is within or out of tolerance
  • 9. 3. Outside seed testing laboratory: • (a) Seed law enforcement- Label prescription: • Under seed law enforcement, the information given on the label affixed/attached on each container of the lot may be above the prescribed seed standards but under prevailing practice in India the information about seed quality attributes given on the label is the same as per prescribed seed standards for each seed quality attribute. • (b) Seed law enforcement-Seed standard prescription: • The central seed committee has prescribed crop wise minimum seed certification standards class wise for labeling seeds. At present the seed certification standards are as such taken for labeling, therefore information on the labels given as per prescribed standards even though the sample might be recording higher germination and purity than the standards. In other words for law enforcement, tolerances are applied whether or not the lot is at least equal to the prescribed minimum limit given on the label.
  • 10. Procedure of using Tolerances: Calculate the average of two results to be compared(only 2 results – purity test, 4 replicate results-germination test) Find the average value in the first column and the tolerance will be found opposite in the column corresponding to the type of test (e.g. in purity tests chaffy vs non-chaffy ;or the number of tests) (in germination tests 3or 4 replicates). If the difference between any 2 tests is greater than the tolerance shown in the table, the results are out of tolerance.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15. Use of Tolerance Table within and between laboratories Test Results • (a)How to Use For Purity Analysis Results: • To compute the tolerances of the components of purity analysis it is necessary to have the information about the magnitude of variation associated with each source of variation, which affects the percent, estimated on a sample from the seed lot.
  • 16. Examples of Use of Tolerance Table for Purity Analysis Results: (i) To ensure accuracy in a laboratory, it is often desired that the submitted sample is divided first into working samples. • Two different seed analysts then analyze each working sample. • Suppose purity percentages of the whole working samples in two tests (by the two analysts) were 98.5 and 96.2. • The question thus arises whether their difference is acceptable. • To determine, this add the two values (98.5+96.2=194.7) and calculate the mean (194.7/2=97.35). • Now in column 1 of purity table 1 find the range that compares with the average figure; it is 97.25-97.49. • The tolerance value given in column of the table is 1.20. • The difference between the two working sample is 98.5- 96.2=2.3. • Since this difference is more than the tolerance the results are not equal, comparable or acceptable; hence fresh test has to be conducted by drawing another working sample.
  • 17. (ii) Sometimes samples of the same seed lot may be tested by two different laboratories. • For e.g. one laboratory finds 98.5% pure seed and the other finds 96.2% pure seed. • To find out whether these values are within tolerance and acceptable, calculate the average, refer purity table 2 and identify the range in which the average falls. • This is 97.25- 97.49 and the tolerance permitted is 1.39 for non-chaffy seed and 1.63 for chaffy seeds. • The difference between the two laboratory results is 2.3. • Therefore it is out of tolerance for both chaffy and non-chaffy seeds and the analysis should be redone. (iii) The examples elaborated in (i) above relate to purity analysis results reported on weight basis. • Foreign seeds are also reported by number per unit weight. • Tolerance values are determined as given above but using table 3 this table can be used in comparing the number of seeds of single species or the total of two or more species.
  • 18. (b) How to Use for Germination Test Results: • The use of tolerances with respect to germination test apply to anyone of the following: • (i) percent normal seedlings seeds (ii) per cent abnormal seedlings (iii) per cent dead seeds (iv) percent hard seeds or (v) the sum of any two or three of these four attributes.
  • 19. • Germination tolerances should be computed allowing for random sampling variation. Among the many causes of significant differences between or among germination tests are -: (i) chance alone (ii) variation due to equipment and materials (iii) methodology (iv) errors or inconsistency in distinguishing between normal and abnormal seedlings (v) fungi or bacteria (vi) chemicals on the seed (vii) inaccurate counting (viii) non random selection of seeds for test or (ix) actual change in the per cent germination between tests.
  • 20. Examples of Use of Tolerance Table for Germination Test Results: • (i) The germination test in a seed-testing laboratory is always conducted as replicated tests of 100 seeds each. • The numbers of replications are normally four; for official evaluations such as in seed law enforcement work, the replications may be three; and for service sample it may be two. • For working out the mean it is necessary that results of the replicated analysis are reliable and within the acceptable tolerance limits. • For example, if the four replications showed germination percentage (Normal seedlings) as- 90, 92, 93 and 83; the average worked out to be the 90 percent. • In germination table 1 column 1, locate the range in which the average percent germination value of 90 falls. • It is (89-90). The maximum tolerance permitted amongst replicates in column 3, is 12. • The maximum difference between these replicates is 93-85=8. • Thus the difference between the replicates is within the tolerance limits and therefore the results of the test are acceptable for adding and working out the average.
  • 21. (ii) Tolerance table-4 is used when two series of replicated tests are made on a sample; for example, for a seed lot the first test replicates averages 85% and the second test replicate averages 89%. • The average of these two independent tests would be 87%, while the difference between the average of the two series of tests is 89-85=4 %. In table- 5, column 1, the average percent germination of 87% falls in the range 85-90%. • The tolerance permitted here is 5, the difference between the average of the two series of tests is only 4; the results are hence within tolerance and therefore, the average of two tests can be reported. • If the difference would have been otherwise then one more test should be made.
  • 22. Importance: It is important to mention here that the tolerances should not be confused with allowances (permissible limits) for labeling of seeds. The tolerances are provided to take care of the unavoidable variation in seed testing results and they are not to be applied prior to labeling by adding them to the results found by test. The tolerance should never be used for the purpose of permitting labelling to show higher quality than is actually found by the test.