Calculating checker efficiency and reducing overtime costs are two important aspects of management that can significantly impact a company's bottom line. By improving checker efficiency and reducing overtime costs, companies can increase productivity, reduce expenses, and improve customer satisfaction. In this article, Establishing clear performance metrics: The first step in calculating checker efficiency is to establish clear performance metrics. These metrics should be specific, measurable, and tied to key performance indicators (KPIs) such as the number of units checked per hour, accuracy rate, and turnaround time. Providing training and support: Checker efficiency can be improved by providing training and support to checkers. This can include training on new processes as well as ongoing coaching and support. By investing in the development of checkers, companies can improve their efficiency and reduce errors. Implementing automation: Automation can significantly improve checker efficiency by reducing the amount of time and effort required to check inventory. Optimizing schedules: Finally, companies can reduce overtime costs by optimizing schedules. This can include adjusting shift schedules, cross-training employees to cover multiple tasks, and using temporary staffing during peak periods. By optimizing schedules, companies can reduce overtime expenses and improve overall efficiency. In conclusion, calculating checker efficiency and reducing overtime costs are important aspects of management that can significantly impact a company's bottom line. By establishing clear performance metrics, tracking performance, providing training and support, implementing automation, and optimizing schedules, companies can improve checker efficiency, reduce overtime costs, and improve overall productivity.

1. Tower C Ghaforia Stitching Unit
25-Mar-23
1
Mr. Sajid Ali Sajid
Mr. Zahid Hussain
Miss Zahra Mirza
Mr. Muhammad Haroon
Mr. Yasir Saleem
:
Adnan Ahmed Siddiqui

2. 25-Mar-23
2
SCOPE
COST
TIME
Quality: Achieving
the expectations of the
stake holder.
Time: Reduce Time
and Duration, achieve
Task in Minimum Time.
Cost: Increase Profit
margin.
Scope: Improve
efficiency in checking.

3. 25-Mar-23
3
 Checker Efficiency
 Reduced Extra Time
 Reduced Work in Process
 Reduced Work One Piece Flow
 Reduced Overtime

4. 25-Mar-23
4
 Checker Fix
 Count Checking Operation
 Calculate “SAM” Operation Wise
 One Piece Flow
 Checker Reward

5. 25-Mar-23
5
START
CUTTING
PRE-
FOLDING
STITCHING
CROPPING
CHECKING
Defects
is 0%
consider
in Bed
Sheets.
OK
NOT OK
RANDOM
OK
NOT OK
INITIAL
CHECKING
PACKING

6. 25-Mar-23 6

7. 25-Mar-23
7
Off loading
Thapi / pairing
Checking
Transportation
Random inspection

8. 25-Mar-23
8
Ok and Not Ok
If OK then initial checking, If Not Ok so then Re-
Checking
Checking to Rack
Checking to Packing

10. 25-Mar-23
10
 NOT CONFIRM SIDE CHECKING OF PCS.
TIME IN SCEONDS
70 86 62 58
34 42 31 59
24 29 31 35

11. 25-Mar-23
11
 DISCUSSION
 ONLY 1 PERSON OFFLOADING FOR TABLE NO 25
 BODY LANGUAGE NOT FAST
PAIR NO# NAME TIME IN SECONDS
12 OWAIS & RIAZ 43 45 25 35
15 HAMOOD & ZOHAIB 41 46 15
25 TAUQEER & AZAM 120 12 35 37

12. 25-Mar-23
12
 DISCUSSION DURING CHECKING
 THREAD ISSUE
 TOUCHING ISSUE
 MOBILE USING
PAIR NO# NAME TIME IN SECONDS
12 OWAIS & RIAZ 34 35 32 35 42
15 HAMOOD & ZOHAIB 29 23 30 21 30
25 TAUQEER & AZAM 57 28 35 20 35

13. 25-Mar-23
13
 SLOW COUNTING DUE TO FIND THREADS OF PCS
PAIR NO# NAME TIME IN SECONDS
12 OWAIS & RIAZ 9 10 13 11
15 HAMOOD & ZOHAIB 15 16 47
25 TAUQEER & AZAM 7 11 10 12

14. 25-Mar-23
14
 LONG DISTANCE OF TABLE NO# 12 TO RANDOM
PAIR NO# NAME TIME IN SECONDS
12 OWAIS & RIAZ 10 13 12 11
15 HAMOOD & ZOHAIB 9 11 10
25 TAUQEER & AZAM 7 6 8 6

15. 25-Mar-23
15
 INSPECTION IS NOT OK
PAIR NO# NAME TIME IN SECONDS
12 OWAIS & RIAZ 11 10 11
15 HAMOOD & ZOHAIB 10 11 9
25 TAUQEER & AZAM 8 7 9

16. 25-Mar-23
16
 TIME WASTE IN AGAIN CHECKIING OF REJECT PCS
 TIE WASTE IN TRANSPORTATION
 DISCUSSION
 AGAIN INSPECTION AS PER DEMAND OF AUDITOR
PAIR NO# NAME TIME IN SECONDS
12 OWAIS & RIAZ 15 16 17
15 HAMOOD & ZOHAIB 25 30 27
25 TAUQEER & AZAM 43 40 35

17. 25-Mar-23
17
 SLOW RUNNING
 DIRECTION NOT CLEAR
PAIR NO# NAME TIME IN SECONDS
12 OWAIS & RIAZ 18 22 9 15
15 HAMOOD & ZOHAIB 10 9 11 17
25 TAUQEER & AZAM 7 5 8 6