1. T h e E m o t io n a l
C o ns e q ue nc e s o f the
Id e a lis a t io n o f t h e E ld e r ly
M a r r ie d A c a d e m ic L ib r a r ia n
( M a le ) b y t h e E ld e r ly
U n m a r r ie d A c a d e m ic
L i b rby Dr a n ( F e m a l e ) BA,a S t uMA, .
a r i Christina Templeton - DipLis, d y
MPhil, PhD. Department of Emotional
Responses and the Consequences of Long
Term Disappointment in Love, Institute of
Behavioural Psychology. Peachtree
University, St. Paul, Chicago

2. References
 Bielenberg, D., Von Wolkenstein, L. & Kruger B. (2007) Goodbye M A R C
– H ello SA M , cataloguing for the new millennium. European Cataloguing
Review, Vol 18 No. 23 pp. 211-241
 Capra, F. (1946 ) I t’s a W onderful L ife. RKO Radio Pictures.
 Cooper, D. et al. (1998). T rust, M istrust and the H uman C ondition. A
L ongitudinal Study. Baltimore Academic Press. Baltimore. Maryland
 Fitzgerald, J. & Bachmann, T. (1987) Sticks and stones can break your heart
– T he F B Severity I ndex. Psychological Science Quarterly Vol 5 No. 12
pp. 120-131

3. References
 Frost, D. & Sheehan, M. (1994) H eartache, heartbreak and romantic yearning
– a continuity scale. Science and Culture, Vol 22 No. 4 pp. 27-48
 Hunter, G. (2006) T he N ewman/ itt/ looney A ttractivety to the Opposite, or
P C
Same, Sex R ating Scale – an appraisal. Psychology Behaviour and Research
Methods, Vol 26 No. 12 pp. 114-131
 Johannsen, A. & Elliot, F. (1968) C ontentment rating scales – how academic
librarians compare with their public librarian counterparts. European
Archives of Clinical Scalability, Vol 2 No. 6 pp. 49-64
 Mannheim, L. & Kendrick, D. (1976) I ’m not ok, you’re ok - a self esteem
rating evaluation Scale, Sociology & Society Quarterly, Vol 6 No. 9 pp.
86-95

4. References
 Mertesacker, P. & Evans, C. (1993) H abitualised L oneliness - a rating scale,
Journal of the Missouri Academy of Sciences, Vol 12 No. 4 pp. 114-140
 Mooney, J. (1989), L oneliness in applying constructivism in academia in
vocational and career education, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 31 No.3/4,
pp.175-90.
 Nicholson, E. (2001), E mergent socio-cultural perspectives on loneliness in the
context of developmental research, Center of Modernist Interpretations of
Post-Modernist thought in Academic Careers in Education and
Training, College of Education, Ohio State University, Ohio.

5. References
 Russell, T. & Paige, E. (1984) C ase studies: anachronism, analyses and
antecedents. Qualitative Research Methods Review, Vol 14 No. 8 pp.
211-222
 Schneider, D. A. (1974) M aking L asting F riendships. Journal of the
Psychology of Relationships, Vol. 12 no. 7 pp.465-78.
 Spencer, S. (1976). L onely in a crowd. Journal of Atavistic
Deconstructionist Modalities. Vol 32 No. 18 pp. 366-379
 Thomas, G. (2011) A typology for the case study in social science following a
review of definition, discourse and structure. Qualitative Inquiry. Vol 16 No. 6
pp. 511-521