The document discusses balancing quality, accessibility, and cost in online learning. It describes how traditional universities focused mainly on quality and accessibility, while distance education and online learning prioritized accessibility and cost-effectiveness. Blended learning aims to balance all three by combining asynchronous online elements through a learning management system with synchronous virtual classroom sessions. A blended online learning environment may achieve this balance by providing an engaging learning experience for faculty and students, while keeping costs lower than fully online or face-to-face only models.
3. LAVAL UNIVERSITY – QUEBEC CITY, CANADA
• 2ND OLDEST in CA‐
USA after Harvard
• +35 K students
• Top 10 in Canada
• French‐language
university
www.ulaval.ca
16-01-07
4. WHY ONLINE LEARNING?
• WORLD‐CLASS EXPERTISE
(1,400 PROFESSORS)
• LARGE UNIVERSITY,
SMALL CITY
• MANY UNMET NEEDS
REGIONALLY,
NATIONALLY AND
INTERNATIONALLY
• NEED FOR OUTREACH
• VIRTUALLY UNLIMITED
www.ulaval.ca
POTENTIAL FOR GROWTH
ONLINE
16-01-07
5. Higher Education
Hundreds of years of tradition…
http://tenthmedieval.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/lecturing‐778306.jpg
11. 2010!
Important Study MARCH 2010
The National Educational Technology
on Educational Plan (NETP)
Technology:
aims at a revolutionary transformation rather than
small, gradual changes…
US Department of Education 2010
17. Traditional Universities
must CHANGE NOW
http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/domenicogelermo/domenicogelermo0810/domenicogelermo081000060/3706694.jpg
http://images.google.ca/
18. Shaping From scholars on foot…
The MIND
ejmas.com
19. Shaping From scholars on foot…
The MIND
to scholars online
ejmas.com
20. Shaping From scholars on foot…
The MIND
to scholars online
ejmas.com
24. OBHE –Olcott/Hanna
Rosovsky (2005):
“By 2010, there will be a hundred million
students in the world fully qualified to
proceed from secondary education to tertiary
education for which there will simply be
no room on any campus, anywhere”.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29. Teacher Education through
Open & Distance Learning (09‐10)
“It is now clear that “bricks and
mortar” approaches to expanding
teacher education may not be
adequate if the current and
projected shortfalls in teacher
supply and low teacher quality are
to be properly addressed”.
39. Daniel’s “Iron Triangle”
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
Current effect, the
State IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
40. Optimizing Higher Education
ACCESS QUALITY ACCESS QUALITY
Desired
Current State
State
COST COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
41. Increase Accessibility?
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
Current effect, the
State IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
42. Increase Accessibility? =
increase Cost & lower Quality
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
effect, the
IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
43. Increase Accessibility? =
increase Cost & lower Quality
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
effect, the
IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
44. Increase Quality?
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
Current effect, the
State IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
45. Increase Quality?
= increase Cost & lower Accessibility
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
effect, the
IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
46. Increase Quality?
= increase Cost & lower Accessibility
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
effect, the
IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
47. Lower COST?
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
Current effect, the
State IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
48. Lower COST?
= lower Accessibility & lower Quality
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
effect, the
IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
49. Lower COST?
= lower Accessibility & lower Quality
ACCESS QUALITY Sir John Daniel termed
the three variable-
based triangle
effect, the
IRON TRIANGLE
COST
Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf
54. Traditional, campus-bound studies
Up to post-WWII,
very few changes Quality
after 700 years Overriding value
of existence
(Keegan, 1996).
•Elitist & Accessibility
Traditional Not a value
undemocratic
Universities
•Incompatible
with emerging
post-WW2
values/needs
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumb_242/1204324714C372RB.jpg
55. Traditional, campus-bound studies
Post- WW2:
need for expansion
Quality
of the university Diminishing value
system
Accessibility
Traditional Overriding value
Universities
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumb_242/1204324714C372RB.jpg
59. The emergence of Distance Education
Distance Education addressing
- MAINLY UNDERGRADUATE
- Negligible impact Accessibility
Main value
- Never went
mainstream
(Moore & Kearsley,
2004)
+
Quality
Sustained value
Open/Dist. Traditional Universities
Universities
COST-EFFECTIVENESS http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumb_242/1204324714C372RB.jpg
60. The emergence of Online learning
Distance Education Online Learning
-Low regular COST-EFFECTIVENESS
Overriding value
faculty
participation
(Shea, 2005;
Sammons & Ruth,
+
2009)
Accessibility
-System within a Parallel value
system
Traditional Universities
becoming Dual-Mode Universities
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumb_242/1204324714C372RB.jpg
61. The emergence of Online learning
Distance Education Online Learning
-Low regular COST-EFFECTIVENESS
Overriding value
faculty
participation
(Shea, 2005;
Sammons & Ruth,
+
2009)
Accessibility
-System within a Parallel value
system
Traditional Universities
becoming Dual-Mode Universities
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumb_242/1204324714C372RB.jpg
62. The emergence of Blended Learning
Online Learning Blended Learning
- Exerting a stronger influence COST-EFFECTIVENESS
Overriding value
CAMPUS ONLINE
DUAL-MODE
UNIVERSITY
PC
One week on ICT
Back ‘n forth Accessibility
One week off Diminished
value
(Harasim, 2000; Seaman & Allen, 2008)
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumb_242/1204324714C372RB.jpg
63. HOW DO WE BALANCE THESE VALUES?
STUDENTS
Accessibility
Overriding value
ADMIN FACULTY
COST-EFFECTIVENESS Quality
Overriding value Overriding value
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumb_242/1204324714C372RB.jpg
68. SO, does BOLD balance the 3 values?
• FACULTY/QUALITY: virtually same learning
experience as F2F + lower front‐end design,
faster start‐up = higher faculty buy-in;
http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg
69. SO, does BOLD balance the 3 values?
• FACULTY/QUALITY: virtually same learning
experience as F2F + lower front‐end design,
faster start‐up = higher faculty buy-in;
• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher
interaction & lower isolation levels =
lower W‐DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;
http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg
70. SO, does BOLD balance the 3 values?
• FACULTY/QUALITY: virtually same learning
experience as F2F + lower front‐end design,
faster start‐up = higher faculty buy-in;
• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher
interaction & lower isolation levels =
lower W‐DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;
• ADMIN: COST‐EFFECTIVENESS: lower start‐up costs;
higher off‐campus student enrolment levels =
higher effectiveness (outreach) without greater cost
http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg
71. SO, does BOLD balance the 3 values?
• FACULTY/QUALITY: virtually same learning
experience as F2F + lower front‐end design,
faster start‐up = higher faculty buy-in;
• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher
interaction & lower isolation levels =
lower W‐DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;
• ADMIN: COST‐EFFECTIVENESS: lower start‐up costs;
higher off‐campus student enrolment levels =
higher effectiveness (outreach) without greater cost
http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg
72. BOLD Research and Researchers
Instructional Design Distance Education/
& Online Learning/
Technology Blended Learning
BOLD
FACULTY GRADUATE
DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
ARE YOU A BOLD RESEARCHER?
74. ENGLISH‐language network
BOLD International Research Network
Dual‐mode universities
Founder: M. Power / Co-founder: N. Vaughan / Coordinator: A. St-Jacques
www.bold‐research.org
75. FRENCH‐language network
E‐learning intégral (synchrone et asynchrone)
Carroll‐Ann
Keating
&
Richard
Lemay
Universités bimodales
Founder: M. Power / Co-founder: N. Vaughan / Coordinator: A. St-Jacques
www.bold‐research.org
76. SPANISH‐language network
Red de investigación hispanófono - design de enviros
de aprendizaje en línea en modo integral
Fabio
Suarez
Universidades bimodales
Founder: M. Power / Co-founder: N. Vaughan / Coordinator: A. St-Jacques
www.bold‐research.org
78. MORE ON BOLD
• Power, M. & Gould‐Morven, A. (2011). Head of gold, feet of clay: the online
learning paradox. International Review of Research on Open and Distance
Learning. Vol. 12 (2). www.irrodl.org
• Power, M. & Vaughan, N. (2010). Redesigning online learning for
graduate seminar delivery. Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 24 (2).
http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/649
• Power, M. (2009). A Designer’s Log: Case Studies in
Instructional Design. Athabasca University Press.
http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120161 .
• Power, M. (2008). The emergence of blended online
learning. MERLOT‐Journal of Online Learning & Teaching
4 (4). http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no4/power_1208.htm
86. New generations of students :
Developing a multitude of individual activities supported
by technologies that allow students to be and to act, by
and for themselves, in cyberspace, irrespective of physical
location;
Finding answers to the majority of their questions on the
Internet. Expect Universities to provide immediate
information processing;
Have grown up with ICT. They are deeply embedded in
their cognitive processes.
86
87. What does this mean for Universities?
Finding the means (the method) to allow students to
acquire knowledge and to give it meaning, by making the
most of the students’own strengths through an optimal
combination of methods.
Providing a relationship to knowledge that is efficient,
relevant and stimulating to promote a real acquisition of
knowledge by students
87
90. Advantages for both universities :
Télé‐université : Support of a large campus‐
based university
UQAM : Means to expand its teaching beyond
Montreal campus
90
92. A considerable challenge…
Two highly different infrastructures and operating
systems;
Growing resistance from UQAM’s faculty as their financial
problems were growing;
Major financial and political crisis at UQAM in 2006 let to
an unexpected change of management in early 2007.
New leadership’s lack of interest.
92
94. Sine qua non conditions
A clear awareness and vision of the profound changes
facing the university as an institution in 21st century
society.
A strong political will : Management must support the
mobilization of the community to this end.
Faculty members themselves must support and
accomplish this transformation.
Mutual respect for the differences inherent in two
complementary teaching modes.
Incentives for improvement and expansion.
94
101. Generations
Age Born
Silent Gen 67 and more Before 1944
Boomers 47‐66 1945‐1964
X 32‐46 1965‐1979
Millenials 11‐31 1980‐2000
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 101
102. Some characteristics of generations
Silent Gen: loyalty, authority, faith in the
institutions, common goal‐oriented
Boomers: influential (numerous), importance of
career, status, hierarchy, processes
X: skeptical, independent / autonomous, skill‐
valuing, well educated
After the boomers’ wave
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 102
104. Millenials
(Values, characteristics)
Selectivity: having the choice
Negociation, Impatient
No tolerance for delay
Personalisation and customisation:
To meet their changing needs, interests and
tastes
Digital natives, Gamers, Experiential
learners
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 104
105. Millenials
(Values and characteristics)
Pragmatic:
Practical; results & achievement‐oriented
Nomad communication style
Multitaskers
The importance of:
Balanced life (work vs personal)
Collaboration
Intelligence
Working smarter not harder
Flexibility/convenience
Thinking outside the box
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 105
106. Millenials
Seniority is no longer important:
What counts is competency;
Earnings should depend on results, not on seniority
Commitment instead of faithfulness:
Will get involved if they have the conditions which they
require: flexibility, responsibility, challenge
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 106
107. Millenials
Are allergic to authority and control.
On the importance of working
relationships.
‘If we can’t find pleasure in our work, we
have to at least find it in the office’.
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 107
109. Effects on the relationship with knowledge
Professor is no longer the only one who knows
Change in relationship with students
A relationship based on authority is replaced by one of
collaboration in the co‐construction of knowledge
Students increasingly want to be active in their
studies
They ask for and need supervision
Also in their use of Internet for educational purposes
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 109
110. Effects on the relation with knowledge
“Students live online; our classes need to live there as
well. Students’ technological preferences show that
traditional classroom lessons might soon be a
campus relic. “Lectures need to transform into
brainstorming sessions, and textbooks need to move
online to take advantage of the wealth of resources
available there.”
Ken Baldauf, director of Florida State University’s
Program in Interdisciplinary Computing
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 110
114. Effects on organisational
management
Some managers are disturbed and feel
threatened by the behaviour of
Millenials:
Ys tend to ask questions about why
things are the way they are
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 114
115. Effects on organisational
management
They insist on transparency:
They don’t understand why organisations hide
information
Anyway, they will talk about everything in social
networks:
Facebook
Ratesmyteachers, Ratemyprofessor
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 115
116. Effects on organisational
management
Hamel (2010) thinks that Ys represent the best
hope for creating new practices in management;
This generation is more influential than the
previous;
The Y generation is in harmony with changes
brought about by the network society
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 116
119. Quotations
« New technologies are leading to major structural
changes in the management and organization of
teaching. »
A.W. Bates
(Managing technological change)
« If you don't try new work models now, when your
organisation is finally forced to change, you may not
like the options. »
Harold Jarch
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 119
121. References
On generations and demographics:
The Center for Generational Studies
David K. Foot: Boom, Bust & Echo
Educause: www.educause.edu
Articles on Internet (Google)
Millenials in education
Millenials Behaviors and Higher Education Focus Group
Results
Fred Bonner Lecture on Teaching Millenials in Higher
Education
Technology a key for students with hectic schedules
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 121
122. References
On management:
Gary Hamel: The Future of Management
http://www.garyhamel.com/
Harold Jarche: http://www.jarche.com/
On the Network society:
Manuel Castells:
http://www.manuelcastells.info/en/index.htm
On Wireharchy:
http://www.wirearchy.com/what‐is‐wirearchy/
Claude Caron ‐ 03/2011 122