The document provides details about an upcoming fieldclass to Mam Tor on March 17th. Students are instructed to meet at the Department at 8:45am and return around 6pm, bringing standard field gear including a mapping board, notebook, compass, ruler, stationary and camera. The fieldclass will involve studying the Mam Tor landslide, a large rotational landslide that occurred approximately 3,600 years ago on glacially oversteepened slopes. Students will examine the geological map and movements monitored between 1996-2002, and discuss how the landslide provides an analogue for sedimentation in half-graben structures.
1. Mam Tor Fieldclass
• Thursday 17th March
– depart from Department at 8.45am
– return approx. 6pm (depending on traffic)
• You will need:
– standard field gear
• mapping board
• notebook
• compass-clinometer
• ruler
• stationary
• camera?
• LUNCH
3. Types of landslide
• Rock failure • Soil failure
– failure plane pre- – failure plane along line
determined of max stress
4. Types of landslide
• Rock failure
– failure along pre-determined planes of
weakness
• Soil failure
– failure along lines of max. stress
• frictional, cohesive = rotational
• frictional, incohesive = planar
5. Rotational landslip analysis
• For undrained frictionless failure
– total stress analysis
• For cohesive and frictional failure
– method of slices
– Bishop’s conventional method (can take into
account pore water pressure)
6. Rotational slip
• total stress analysis
or φu = 0
• strength parameters
are those of
undrained soil
where
F = restraining moment
disturbing moment
Cr θ 2
F= C = cohesive strength (Pa)
r = slip circle radius (m)
We θ= slip sector in radians
W = weight of sliding sector (N)
e = eccentricity of sliding sector (m)
7. Method of slices
• Swedish circle
method
• For use with cohesive
and frictional soils
Crθ + ∑1 N n tan φ
n
F=
∑T
n
1 n
8. Effect of a tension crack
• Reduces the angle of
the sliding sector
Height of tension crack:
For frictionless soil
2C
hc =
ρ
Cohesive and frictional soil
C = cohesive strength (Pa)
ρ= unit weight of soil (N m-3)
2C φ φ = friction angle
hc = tan 45 +
ρ 2
9. Location of slip circle centre
• No simple way – trial
and error
• F more sensitive to
horizontal movements
than vertical
movements
11. Other methods of analysis
• Taylor’s stability analysis
– used for frictional and cohesive soils
– uses a dimensionless number to iterate
towards a solution
• Bishop’s method
– effect of forces on each side of slice
considered
– iterative method
13. Flowslides
• Soil, clay, rock debris may behave like
liquid; water content is > liquid limit
– flowslide
• Flowslides are extremely mobile
– e.g. Yungay, Peru, 1970
14. Mt. Huascaran, Peru, 1970
• earthquake triggered
flowslide
• hit towns of Yungay
and Ranrahirca, 18
km away, at around
150 km/hr
• Yungay completely
buried, 66,000 dead
17. Mam Tor landslide
• Occurred due to glacially oversteepened
slopes
• Age ~3600 years, from radiocarbon dating
of tree remains recovered from boreholes
• ~300 m wide and ~1000 m long
• Upper part
– multiple rotation landslide
• Lower part
– debris flow
22. Mam Tor references
• Skempton, A.W. et al., 1989, The Mam
Tor landslide, North Derbyshire, Phil.
Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. 329, 503-547
• Rutter, E.H. et al., 2003, Strain
displacements in the Mam Tor landslip,
Derbyshire, England, J. Geol. Soc. Lond.
160, 735-744.