Präsentation von Dr. Ulrich Fastenrath, Head of Product Development T-Systems Traffic GmbH, zu TMCpro, Floating Phone Data und der Zukunft von Verkehrsinformationsdiensten
TMCpro: Presence and Future of Real Time Traffic Information
1. TMCpro -
Presence and Future of Real Time Traffic Information
Dr. Ulrich Fastenrath
T-Systems – Systems Integration
DDG Gesellschaft für Verkehrsdaten mbH
2. System overview
Sat-Uplink
Leased lines
Playout Center
Traffic Data
ISDN
Administrator
page 1
3. The TMCpro approach to quality
Quality
Traffic
Modelling and
100% Forecasting
Raw Content Service Terminal User
Data Provider Provider Device
page 2
4. Producing Numerical Data with Sensors
Stationary data collection systems improve the quality of traffic information.
GSM
DDG
4.000 sensors
Sensor
> 5.500 loops • measures traffic flow and
average speed
• distinguishes cars from
trucks
Detected network contains • reports programmable events
>90% of all incidents
page 3
5. From Traffic Data to Traffic Information
LMSt VIZ / VRZ SES FCD
Data sources
Data Communication interfaces, Data preprocessor
collection (Plausibility checks, Aggregation, Localization)
Product ∂ρ Traffic )
∂( ρV analysis, Generation of traffic reports,
+ = ν rmp ,
generation ∂t ∂x
Calculation of travel times, Historical time series,
Disturbance development forecasts, ν
∂V ∂V 1 ∂P( ρ ) 1
Traffic data +V =− Short term predictions, rmp ⋅ (Vrmp − V ).
+ ⋅ (Ve − V ) +
management ∂t ρ ∂x τ (ρ)
∂x automated consistency checks, ρ
center Customer specific features
Traffic information
(Customer interface)
page 4
6. Traffic does not behave as it is supposed to
Extrapolation characteristic, 2 lanes
0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
Gamma
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
k [Fzg./km]
gamma_s60 std_gamma_s60 std_gamma_s300 gamma_c std_gamma_c gamma_s300
page 5
8. Coming to terms with the past
Aggregation Interval Time Diagonal
System Telegram #3
Time Telegram #2
Telegram #1
Data Time
page 7
9. Go with no flow?
Classification of zero flux Classification of zero flux
(inductive loops) (infrared detectors)
100 100
80 80
frac frac SV
60 SV 60
tion tion FV
[%] FV [%]
KA
40 KA 40
SV meas
20 20
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Time of the day Time of the day
Shown in red is the fraction of all zero flux situations which were due to stationary traffic
(data are from 15.05.2002 15:00 - 20.05.2002 06:40)
page 8
10. Is the traffic still there when nobody looks?
150
velocity [km/h]
100 MQ
LOK
HIL
GKT
50
0
07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00
time
Passage of shock fronts at a virtual detector: the test position is 2284 m
away from the upstream detector and 3581 m away from the
downstream detector.
page 9
13. A Scheme for measuring Product Quality
Reference: BMW AG, Dr. Klaus Bogenberger,
„Qualität von Verkehrsinformationen“,
Straßenverkehrstechnik 10/2003
customers‘
expectation
page 12
15. Road Weather and Road Conditions
Road detector system for icy conditions
TMC-Code Meaning
1002 Danger of aquaplaning
1003 Slippery road
1019 Slippery road due to frost
1009 Freezing rain
1008 Black ice
1011 Slush
1112 Rain
1109 Heavy rain
1104 Snowfall
1101 Heavy snowfall
1107 sleet
page 14
22. Some Varieties of Traffic Forecast
Growth Rate
Duration
?
?
q
! Pre-
Warning
page 21
23. Bottlenecks
A Qarr(A)
B
Qarr(B)
link
active blocked
9576 bottlenecks analysed
spillover 2843 bottlenecks
breakdown considered relevant
for pre-warnings
recovery
recovery
inactive
activity of bottlenecks
page 22
24. Breakdown Frequencies at Bottlenecks
Reference: Brilon, W.; Zurlinden, H.: Kapazität von Straßen als Zufallsgröße,
Straßenverkehrstechnik 4/2004, S. 164-172
page 23
25. Breakdown Probabilities at Bottlenecks
Flow rate (q), probability of breakdown (Pbd) and of congestion (Pc ) at
site Düsseldorf Mörsenbroich located along the highway A52
100% 1200
80%
900
flow rate [vphpl]
probability [%]
60% P_bd(+15 min)
600 P_c
40% q
300
20%
0% 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
time of day 05.07.2004 [h]
Breakdown of traffic flow is a stochastic event, whereby probabilities of
breakdown are associated with specific flow rates.
page 24
27. Delay Times at Bottlenecks
Delay caused by breakdown of traffic flow
at different times T bd
50
40 T_bd=5,75
Delay [min]
30 T_bd=6,5
20 T_bd=7,5
T_bd=8,0
10
0
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
entry time [h]
page 26
32. Motorways are not enough
1,280,000 km
in total
23,000 km 106,000 km
motorways highways
page 31
33. Do-iT: The Project
Do-iT is part of the research and development
Do-iT initiative „Verkehrsmanagement 2010“ sponsored
by BMWi
Partners:
Innenministerium Baden-Württemberg
Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart
Stadt Karlsruhe
Universität Stuttgart, represented by
Institut für Anwendungen der Geodäsie im Bauwesen and
Lehrstuhl für Verkehrsplanung und Verkehrsleittechnik
Associated: T-Mobile Deutschland GmbH ====!quot;§==Mobile=
DDG Gesellschaft für Verkehrsdaten mbH
page 32
34. Floating Phone Data: Functional Principle
Do-iT
A-bis A
interface interface
BTS BSC
BTS MSC
BSC
MS BTS
Network Probes
Mobile Phone Positioning
Identification of Active Road Users
Data provision for
public and private Floating
Phone Data
Map-Matching &
applications Trajectory Generation
FPD-Server
Reference:33
page IAGB University of Stuttgart
35. Establishing the Data Basis
Do-iT
BTS
BTS BSC MSC
MS
All mobiles: A-bis link A link
• Localisation Updates
(in particular at LA updates) (LAC1) -> (LAC2,CI2)
Active mobiles only: (CI1) -> (CI2)
• Handover events
• Measurement Reports (~ 2 Hz) CI,TA (=distance)
Field strength
Temporary Mobile Subscriber ID
Master data needed for Cell geometry
interpretation:
Topology data
(=antenna locations)
Best server plots page 34
36. Network covered and Applications
Do-iT
Applications
A-Net
U-Net motorways
Innenministerium BW
(A-Net, U-Net): diversion routes
AK Walldorf
• Dynamic Network Control
• Traffic State of U-Net
AK Weinsberg
Cities of Stuttgart and
Karlsruhe B-Net
(C-Net, urban U-Net): federal highways
• Improvement of knowledge
about current traffic situation
• Estimation of Travel Times C-Net
• direct measurement of the City of Karlsruhe
impact of network control
• improvement of control
strategies
C-Net
DDG (all networks): City of Stuttgart
• Navigate, TMCpro
page 35
37. Measurement of Traffic Flow
Do-iT
Comparison of Location Area Updates
and traffic flow as measured by stationary sensor
4000
3500
3000
Rate [events/h]
2500
Q-SES
2000
LA boundary LAC-Updates
1500
LA 2 1000
LA 1
500
CI 2
0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 0
time of day [HH]
Cell boundary
Flow of mobiles ≠ traffic flow
Frequency of transitions Superposition of more than one traffic flow
LA1 → (LA2,CI2)
page 36
54. Enrichment of stationary Infrastructure by the
Mobile Network
A8-OW (stk_id=5)
TMC-LC
LUP +
Call
LATT-
LUP
Messung
SES/VIZ
AK AS AD AS AS
Stuttgart Leonberg Heimsheim Pforzheim
O page 53
N W
56. Do-iT Example for Incident Localisation
Floating Phones Stationary Sensors
Incident indication
time of day
location
page 55
57. Sources for Traffic Data in Germany in the Course of Time
stationary
detection
Cities traffic management
systems
centers
convergence FCD
diverse FCD species zone
motor Net-FCD
ways
limited installations
rollout net-FCD
high SES of DDG
ways
Regional TICs GATS-FCD
1990 2000 2010 2020
page 56
58. Sensors, Floating Cars and Floating Phones
Do-iT
Floating Phones
Police Loops Sensors Floating Cars
Data Collection
Traffic Modelling
Editorial Traffic Forecast
Team
Traffic information
page 57