Design of Preliminary Wastewater Treatment for Devils Backbone Brewery
1. Design of Preliminary
Wastewater Treatment for
Devils Backbone Brewery
Marett Richardson Reece Wilber Sydney Lynn
Advisors: Caye Drapcho, Terry Walker, Tom Owino, Natasha Bell, Tom Jones,
Jazmine Taylor
2. Introduction
Recognizing the Problem: Devils
Backbone’s side-stream wastewater
is causing a problem at local
wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).
How to Address the Problem:
Remove high levels of BOD/COD
from the side-stream.
Photo by: Sydney Lynn
3. Goals
Bioprocessing:
● Reduce BOD to 150-200 mg/L
● Utilize biogas from waste biomass to fuel boilers
Structural:
● Structurally sound Anaerobic Digester
● Housing for CSTR and pumps
Mechanical:
● Separate yeast biomass from side-stream
● Pump to treatment location
● Mix/Aerate Anaerobic Digester
4. Safety
● Acidity of COD test
● Biogas Production
Ethical
● Who are the stakeholders?
● Food contamination
● Disrupting surrounding
environment
Considerations
Ecological
● Not to cause harm to local
environment
Ultimate use:
● Reduce the BOD
● Produce value from waste
5. Sustainability
● Use yeast waste to generate
valuable product
http://biodiversitysrilanka.org/2017/03/08/issues-of-social-environmental-
sustainability/
6. Constraints
Skills
● Outsourcing Contracting
● Knowledge of Biological
Kinetics and Heat and
Mass Transfer
Budget
● Flexible (Short Return on
Investment time)
Time
● Flexible
● Quick to reduce impact
on WWTP
Space
● 12-14 acres
Logistics
● Feasible
● Economic
7. Questions
User Questions (Devils Backbone Employee):
● What are the number of work hours needed to operate?
● What technical skills needed to operate system?
● What are the potential safety concerns?
Designer Questions (Us):
● Average weekly brewhouse wastewater sent to WWTP currently?
● How do we make flow to WWTP more constant?
● What parameters are currently required for WWTP?
Client Questions (Devils Backbone Management):
● What is the initial cost?
● What is the return of investment?
● How long will it take to construct the system?
10. Thermal Mass Balance:
Rate of Metabolic Heat
Generation (rH):
Total Heat Generation of
Microbes (Ėg):
Governing Equations - Heat Transfer
Log mean Temperature
Difference in Pipe Flow (𝛥Tlm):
Heat Loss in System from
Single Pipe (qheat exchanger):
Reynolds Number
11. Governing Equations -Defining Variables
Heat Transfer
● 𝛥Tlm =Log Mean Temperature Difference (K)
● Tmo = Temperature of Pipe Inflow (K)
● Tmi = Temperature of Pipe Inflow (K)
● T∞ = Temperature of Reactor (K)
● U = inverse unit area thermal resistance (W/m2K)
● D = diameter of pipe in heat exchanger (m)
● L = length of pipe in heat exchanger
● U = inverse unit area thermal resistance (W/m2K)
● hi and ho = Convection Coefficients (W/m2K)
● μ = dynamic viscosity (Ns/m2 or kg/ms)
● Q = flow rate (m3/s)
12. Possible Solutions
Solid Waste:
● Animal Feed
● Anaerobic Digester
Liquid Waste:
● Constructed Wetland
● Released at 4 gal/min to
WWTP
● CSTR
13. Past Experience
● Biological Kinetics
○ COD Lab
○ CSTR Design
● Bioprocessing Classes
○ Biochemistry
○ Bioprocess Engineering
● Sustainable Energy
Production
● Heat and Mass Transfer
○ Heat exchanger design
● Internships
○ Brewery and Lab Tech Intern this
summer
○ Intern at Santasalo Gears
○ Resource recovery intern
14. Background: What is COD?
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
● the amount of organic carbons that bacteria can oxidize
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
● total measurement of all chemicals in the water that can be oxidized
How They’re Related:
● BOD = 60% of COD
● COD is 150-330 mg/L
20. Analysis of Data
● High COD values
○ Liquid must be treated as well
● Amount of solids
○ 40% of volume is Yeast Mass
Sample Theoretical COD
(mg/L)
Average Calculated
COD (mg/L)
Liquid (Beer) 125,000-300,000 29,691
Mass (Yeast) 120,000-200,000 94,931
Mixed Side-Stream 5,000-40,000 93,041
21. Synthesis of Design: Overall View
Brewery
Primary
Settling
Tank
Side-stream
CSTR
Solid Waste
Liquid
Waste
Generated
Yeast
Mass
Treated
Liquid
Waste
WWTP
Generated
Yeast Mass
Biogas
Iron
Sponge
Clean
Biogas
Fuel for
Boilers
Anaerobic Digester
Gas Storage Tank
Secondary
Settling
Tank
22. Primary Settling Tank
Side-stream
from Brewery
150,000 L/day
Liquid Waste to
CSTR
90,000 L/day
30,000 mg/L COD
60,000 L/day
95,000 mg/L COD
Solid Waste to
Anaerobic Digester
Volume = 152,000 L
http://ecompendium.ssw
m.info/sanitation-
technologies/settler
25. Secondary Settling Tank
Liquid Waste to
WWTP
90,120 L/day Waste
Liquid
31 mg/L COD
730 L/day Biomass
31 mg/L COD
Solid Waste to
Anaerobic Digester
Generated Yeast
Mass Mix
Q = 90,850 L/day
XB = 9.4 g/L biomass
S = 31 mg/L COD
Volume = 92,000 L
http://ecompendium.ssw
m.info/sanitation-
technologies/settler
26. Anaerobic Digester
Solid Waste
from
Settling
Tanks
60,730 L/day
95,000 mg/L COD
as biomass
Biogas
Produced
1,730,000 L/day
biogas
Temperature = 35 °C
Volume = 260,000 L
𝜏 = 4.18 day
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic_digestion
28. Temperature in Anaerobic Digestor
Initial Thermal Mass Balance:
Flow Rate of Water in Pipe Heat Exchanger (Q):
For additional
calculations, see
Appendix
32. Alternative Design Options
Releasing Side-stream at 4 gal/min
Brewery
Primary
Settling
Tank
Side-stream
Solid Waste
Liquid
Waste
4 gal/min
WWTP
Biogas
Iron
Sponge
Clean
Biogas
Fuel for
Boilers
Anaerobic Digester
Gas Storage Tank
33. Alternative Design Options
Releasing Side-stream at 4 gal/min to WWTP
● 24,000 gallons/day side-stream
● 4.16 days to release at 4 gal/min
● Flow-rate would have to be 16.66 gal/min
https://alliancetruckandtank.com/products/storage-tanks/
35. Composting Solid Waste
● 60,730 L/day solid waste
● Cheaper Option
● No biogas production
Alternative Design Options
http://weclipart.com/compost+pit+clipart
36. Synthesis of Design: Results
Biogas Produced: 1,730,000 L/day
Amount of Energy from Produced Biogas:
64 MBTU = 18,750 kW/hr per day
Amount of Energy Required to Run System:
288 kW/hr per day
37. Synthesis of Design: Results
Cost of Design:
Component Price ($)
Gas Storage Tank 865
Liquid Pumps 2,010
Air Pumps 3,600
Anaerobic Digester 250,000
CSTR 32,000
Piping 2,000
Settling Tanks 107,079
Iron Sponge 650
Total Cost $398,204
38. Economics Results
Money Saved from Biogas Production: $196.22/day
How long to get ROI:
5.5 years operating 7 days/week
7.6 years operating 5 days/week
39. Conclusion
● COD/BOD was reduced
via CSTR
● Sustainable fuel source
for boilers
https://www.showclix.com/event/devils-backbone-pa-kick-off-beer-dinner
40. Conclusion - Questions Answered
User Questions (Devils Backbone Employee):
● What are the number of work hours needed to operate?
● What technical skills needed to operate system?
● What are the potential safety concerns?
Designer Questions (Us):
● Average weekly brewhouse wastewater sent to WWTP currently?
● How do we make flow to WWTP more constant?
● What parameters are currently required for WWTP?
Client Questions (Devils Backbone Management):
● What is the initial cost?
● What is the return of investment?
● How long will it take to construct the system?
44. References
1. John. “Brewery Wastewater BOD values”. 24 March 2015.
http://brewerywastewater.com/brewery-wastewater-bod-values/
2. Meussdoerffer, Franz G. “A Comprehensive History of Beer Brewing”. 15 Sep.
17. https://application.wiley-vch.de/books/sample/3527316744_c01.pdf
3. Oliva-Teles, Aires, and Paula Gonçalves. "Partial replacement of fishmeal by
brewers yeast (Saccaromyces cerevisae) in diets for sea bass (Dicentrarchus
labrax) juveniles." Aquaculture 202.3 (2001): 269-278.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848601007773
4. Van Der Merwe, M., Britz, T.J. “Data from Anaerobic Digestion of Baker’s
Yeast Factory Effluent Using an Anaerobic Filter and a Hybrid Digester”
Biosource Technology 43 (1992): 169-174.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/096085249390177D
5. Feng, Y., Wang, X., Logan, B.E. et al. “Brewery Wastewater Treatment Using
Air-Cathode Microbial Fuel Cell” Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2008) 78: 873.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1360-2 .
6. Shahida Begum and A H Nazr. 2013. “Energy Efficiency of Biogas Produced
from Different Biomass Sources”
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/16/1/012021/pdf
45. 7. Otter, G. E., A.R.I.C. and L. Taylor, B,Sc., F.R.I.C. “Determination of the
Sugar
Composition of wort and beer by gas liquid Chromatography.” 8 March 1967.
Courage, Barclay & Simonds Limited, Southwark Bridge, London, S.E.I)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1967.tb03086.x/p
df
8. Drapcho, Dr. Caye. “Biological Kinetics”. (BE 4100) Class Notes.
9. Drapcho, Dr. Caye. “Heat and Mass Transfer”.(BE 4120) Class Notes.
10. Khanal, Samir Kumar. “Biomass Yield”. Anaerobic Biotechnology for
Bioenergy Production: Principles and Applications. Nov 18, 2011.
11. Biogas Production from Brewery Wastewater. Biothane. Retrieved from
http://technomaps.veoliawatertechnologies.com/processes/lib/pdfs/3292,Article-
Jorien-final.pdf
12. Natural Gas. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved from
https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/weekly/
13. Moser, M, R Mattocks, Dr. S Gettier, K Roos. Benefits, Costs and
Operating
Experience at Seven New Agricutural Anaerobic Digesters. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.591.1823&rep=rep1
&type=pdf
References
49. Appendices - CSTR Calculations
New Substrate Utilization with 𝜏safe:
Also know as, COD output for CSTR
50. Appendices - CSTR Calculations
Biomass Concentration in CSTR:
Biomass Produced in CSTR to be sent to AD:
51. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Specific Growth Rate of Heterotrophic Bacteria on Yeast
Mass (𝜇):
Metabolic Heat Yield [1/YH]:
52. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Hydraulic Retention Time (𝜏):
Biomass Concentration (XB):
Source: Biological Kinetics (BE 4100) Class
Notes. Lecture X Page X. Caye Drapcho.
53. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Rate of Heat Generation (rH):
System Volume (V):
Total Heat Generation in System (Ėg):
54. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Sum of Resistances for Heat loss (RT):
Heat Loss in System to Conduction and Convection (qloss):
Where layer 1 is the enamel
coating in the digester and layer 2
is the concrete used for the
structure.
qcond was lost only from one side
of the digester, the top, because
all other sides were perfectly
insulated with the Pamunkey soil.
55. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Initial Thermal Heat Balance:
● 90°C is too hot for this anaerobic digestion
● A cooling system was installed to cool system for optimum digestion
temperature
56. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Thermal Heat Balance to bring down to 35°C (308 K):
Heat loss required by cooling system (qheat exchanger):
57. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Set following values to solve for Log Mean Temperature
Difference (𝛥Tlm):
● (T∞) = 35°C = 308 K
● (Tmo) = 34°C = 307 K
● (Tmi) = 7°C = 280 K
58. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Solve for inverse unit area thermal resistance (U):
Convection Coefficient (hi):
The conduction (𝛥x/k) is assumed to
be 0 because it is a thin metal wall.
59. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Nusselt’s Number (Nu):
Reynolds Number for Turbulent Flow (ReD):
60. Appendices - Anaerobic Digester Calculations
Flow Rate of Water in Pipe Heat Exchanger (Q):
Editor's Notes
Marett
DB was sending BOD values of about 56,000 when the WWTP could only handle about 175.
The high BOD was a problem because it was causing the DO in their oxidation ditch to go to 0
Marett
marett
Biogas production has hydrogen sulfide that is dangerous when combusted
Marett
Talk about the importance of the 3 pillars of sustainability and how we apply that to this project
Marett
Reece
Reece
Reece
Reece
Substrate = glucose
Marett
Marett
Substrate = glucose
Sydney
Wetland for nitrogen and phosphorous not treating industrial carbon
Sydney
Sydney
A COD test was conducted over a BOD test because it is easier, quicker, and more reliable than a BOD Test - also is the main test used in wastewater treatment now (BK notes)
T
Sydney
Sydney
Sydney
Sydney
Sydney
Sydney
Reece
Reece
Volumes determined from Imhoff test
Liquid removed after t=i hr because that leaves a known amount of yeast still suspended in liquid
Assuming biomass and liquid are 100% separated after t<1.5 hr
Reece
Si is from data collected
XBi = 0 because we are assuming 100% seperatoin of liquid from mass in primary tank
Flowrate in = flowrate out
The retention was calculated and then adjusted for the safety factor and then the
Reece
Substrate = glucose
Sydney
Assume that the settling rate is still 40% after 2 hours
Sydney
We are designing a continuous digester because we will adding mass everyday
We chose an underground design because it is cheaper and simpler to build
The AD will be Inoculated with Heterotrophic Bacteria from waste.
Saftey: sufficient ventilation, check valves
Marett
We used comsol to help with the heat loss due to conduction and convection on the top side of the AD
Marett
qcond was lost only from one side of the digester, the top, because all other sides were perfectly insulated with the Pamunkey soil.
Sydney
Wastewater treatment facilities require thorough and complete sludge mixing to ensure uniform temperature, solids distribution and microorganism contact to increase gas production and maximize the solids destruction.
Significant energy savings compared to conventional sludge mixing systems
Ovivo’s LM™ mixer is a proven technology that achieves over 90% active tank volume
Ragless design and low cost maintenance
Capital and installation cost savings compared to rotary mixers
https://www.ovivowater.com/product/municipal/municipal-wastewater/sludge-treatment-anaerobic-digestion/digestion-mixing/ovivo-lm-mixer-linear-motion/
Sydney
Biogas produced from anaerobic digestion of brewery wastewater is typically 70-85% methane (CH4), 15-30% carbon dioxide (CO2), and trace amounts of sulfuric acid (H2SO4).
The gas produced will be cleaned prior to combustion in the brewhouse by removing hydrogen sulfide because it corrodes metal and form poisonous sulphur dioxide (SO2) during combustion.
As the biogas flows through the iron sponge, the hydrated iron oxide reacts with H2S forming iron sulphide, thus removing H2S from the gas and producing heat”
Reece
Double membrane methane gas tank & gas storage system
As an added benefit to the reduction of COD, the Brewery is currently stockpiling propane because their local gas plant can’t provide them with enough fuel through their pipes. The biogas produced can be stored on site to be burned when needed and the brewery no longer has to buy propane.
Marett
This would be an alternative to the CSTR in the main design
This is what the WWTP originally asked for and what DB had to do for Side-stream but for large quantities everyday it didn’t match up
Marett
This would be an alternative to the CSTR in the main design
This is what the WWTP originally asked for and what DB had to do for Side-stream but for large quantities everyday it didn’t match up
Flowrate would have to be 16.66 gal/min to make tanks not overfill everyday
Reece
The installation cost would reduce but the brewery wouldn’t be making any money unless the compost was being sold to local farmers. Research shows that others are selling compost in the area to local farmers so there is a potential market but the ROI would be much longer.
Reece
Sydney
Amount of Energy Required to Run System:
Pumps
Mixer
Air compressor
Marett
https://www.grainger.com/category/pumps/ecatalog/N-birZble air pump for biogas (275gpm)
Marett
Reece
Sydney
The main goal for this project was to help devils backbone decrease their effluent COD to the WWTP. We accomplished this by allowing yeast to grow on the COD in a CSTR, reducing the COD to 31 mg/L.
As a byproduct for our design, Devils backbone will now no longer have to stockpile propane for lack of fuel, instead they will have a sustainable fuel source for years to come.
Reece