1. CPE 311 – Methods of Research
Name: Siegrique Ceasar A. Jalwin BSCPE-3A Date: 04/03/2022
End of Chapter Questions:
1. List common mistake to avoid in reviewing the literature.
Reviewing a literature is not:
Simply a set of documents that you believe are relevant, or any document that you see.
Addressed as just a collection where each text is addressed in order.
A list of all the content relevant to your area of study, regardless of its importance to your
plan.
A descriptive overview of each article.
2. What is a theoretical framework?
The "theoretical framework" is the second framework among the four constructs of the
research study strategy. The second paradigm, thus, is based on the theoretical framework
and emerges out of the conceptual framework.
3. Give some pointers in writing the literature review.
1. Proof of reading would still be needed for some study.
2. Researchers gather several data, but then pick, arrange and interpret results into a
cohesive pattern.
3. Not only can the system include a map of how the study will be performed and
interpreted, but it would also provide you an overview of the framework for your analysis.
4. Research analyses must be concise and, much further than possible, include an image of
the state of information and main problems in a small sample in the field of your subject.
5. Make sure all sources are complete. Notice the text citation of some positive ideas quotes
and paraphrases. You can't do it without the root being remembered. If you do, you might
be included in the plagiarism contest.
6. Observe your own language. This might be possible to make inferences, but it is
impossible to 'prove' when working with human beings.
7. Check your references thoroughly before you plan to use them.
8. Know, once you equate like with like, you can't make any arguments about comparability.
9. Don't be tempted to abandon all of our study papers only because they vary from your
own conclusions.
10. Begin your first draft review soon in your research. A lot of drafts will be needed until
you have a cohesive and 'relevant' account, but it's easier to start tiny and then expand on
your first attempt than to make sense of anything you've read in one try
2. 4. How to prevent plagiarism in the literature review?
You need to refer to the research to prevent plagiarism in the literature review. Made sure
that all sources are correct. Notice the comparison list with certain constructive suggestions
for quotations and paraphrases. If you may not refer appropriately, you might be included in
the plagiarism challenge.
5. What is the importance of literature review?
A major benefit of the literature review is that it assures that your topic is researchable
before sufficient test starts. Too frequently, new science students balance the scope of their
research with its importance.
6. Cite some activities that need to be consider in writing literature review.
After all, the review of the literature would do the following: 1. Being structured around
rather than specifically relevant to the thesis or study issue that you are creating. 2.
Synthesize the findings with a description of what is or is not understood. 3. Classify
troublesome areas or areas of contentiousness in the literature 4. Formulate problems or
concerns that require further study.
7. Questions to be considered when conducting a literature review.
1. What is the basic thesis, issue, or study question that my review of the literature seeks to
describe?
2. What kind of literature review am I implementing? I am looking at the problems of
philosophy, methods, strategy, quantitative analysis, qualitative research.
3. What is the scope of my study of the literature? What kind of journals do I use?
4. Does the author formulate a question/problem?
5. Have I evaluated the opportunities I've identified critically?
6. How am I going to stop mentioning and summing up resources? Do I measure them,
address strengths and weaknesses?
7. Have I cited and addressed findings that are contradictory to my point of view?
8. Will the audience find my review of the literature important, acceptable and helpful?
9. How reliable and true are the calculations, figures or data presented by the author?
10. Is the study of observations, figures or data reliable and important to the research issue?
11. Are the findings validly founded on evidence and observation?
3. 8. How to locate sources for literature review?
To locate sources for the literature review, the key path is via the online libraries of every
college online library. This database will mostly contain scholarly journal papers that also do
or do not subscribe to the accessible library, or are increasingly common to articles that are
available for free in digital format at once.
9. What is the difference between a quality and a poor literature review?
According to (Hart, 1998), quality means proper/appropriate width and scope, specificity
and accuracy, concision, clarification, synthesis, and successful analysis; in other terms, by
use of ideas in the research to endorse a particular strategy for the topic, the choice of
strategies and processes and the evidence that this research leads to something special.
While a poor literature review cannot be blamed on the individual scholar, but it also can be
a mistake for those who provide instruction in science education.
10. List at least five purposes of literature review. Discuss briefly.
1. Trying to distinguish what's been accomplished from what needs to happen.
2. Explore essential variables related to the topic.
3. To synthesize and develop a new insight.
4. Trying to establish the context of the question or issue.
5. Trying to rationalize the relevance of the dilemma. Research has an imaginary aspect.
That's the desire to build and interact with pictures in your imagination or on paper, to
rediscover the kid in an adult. This refers to dreaming using visual symbols, without
restriction or preconceptions, which includes giving the brain free rein.
