2. Introduction
• Chronic pancreatitis is defined as “Continuing
inflammatory disease of pancreas characterized by
irreversible morphologic changes that cause
abdominal pain and/or permanent impairement of
pancreatic function”
5. • Symptomatology
– Abdominal pain (90%)
• Episodic
• Exacerbated by eating
• “Burnout” period in late phase
– Weight loss
• Avoidance of meals because of exacerbation of pain
• Malabsorption
– Bloating discomfort
– Change in bowel habits
6. – Exocrine insufficieny (4-30%)
• Steatorrhoea
• Malabsorption
– Endocrine insufficiency
• 90% parenchyma replaced by fibrosis
– Extrapancreatic complications
• Biliary obstruction (3-30%), due to fibrosis of head of
pancreas
• Duodenal obstruction (2-12%)
• Splenic vein thrombosis (2%)
– Risk of pancreatic cancer
7. Management of chronic Pancreatitis
• Conservative Management
– Dietary modifications (Alcohol abstinence, Rich in
carbs, Medium chain TG, Vitamins)
– Pancreatic Exocrine enzyme Supplementation
– Insulin for type I Diabetes
– Treatment of Pain
• Medical management (NSAIDS/PCM, Opiods,
Antidepressant)
• Interventional procedures (Celiac plexus nerve block)
8. Endoscopic Management
• ESWL/Mechanical Lithotripsy
• Stenting
• Short lived patency i.e. need to change stent 2-4 monthly
• Occluded by calcified debris or protienaceous material
• Useful for
– Proximal stenosis without calcification or mass
– Pancreatic pseudocyst
– If not sufficiently effective after a year of treatment
or 2-3 failed endoscopy then referred to surgery
9. Surgical Treatment
• Two main concepts
1. Preservation of tissue via drainage
• Aim to protect against further loss of pancreatic
function
2. Pancreatic Resection
• For non dilated pancreatic ducts
• Pancreatic Head enlargements
• If pancreatic Carcinoma suspected in setting of CP
10. Indications for surgery
1. Intractable abdominal pain
2. Symptomatic local complications (biliary
stricture, duodenal stenosis, pseudocyst,
sinistral hypertension)
3. Unsuccessful endoscopic management
4. Suspicion of malignancy
11. Role of surgical management
– Pain relief
– Control of complications
– Preservation of exocrine and endocrine functions
– Social and occupational rehabilitation
– Improvement of quality of life
12. • Role of surgery in management of pain
– 75-90% success in pain relief
– Pain relief with surgery vs medical treatment
• 63 vs 43% @10 yr
13. Surgical Procedures
A. Drainage procedure
– Duval’s Procedure
– Puestow (resection of pancreatic tail and LPJ)
– Modified Peustow or Partington Rochelle (Lateral
Pancreatojejunostomy(LPJ)
14. B. Resection Procedure
– Total Pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplant
– Pancreatoduodenectomy (Classic Whipples,
Pylorus preserving PD)
– Distal pancreatectomy
C. Combined/Hybrid procedure
– DPPHR (Begers operation, Bern, Frey’s )
– Izbicki’s operation
15.
16. Drainage Procedures
– Indication
• Isolated dilatation of the pancreatic duct >7mm or
“chain of lakes” appearance without an inflammatory
mass in the head
• Generalized parenchymal involvement (no focal
involvement)
• Recurrent or progressive segmental stenosis of the
pancreatic duct
17. Duval’s procedure (1954)
–Drainage ofthe tail with a Roux-en-Y limb of jejunum
– Not effective for disease in the proximal pancreas
Distal pancreatectomy and
splenectomy with an end-to-end
pancreaticojejunostomy
18. Puestow’s Procedure (1958)
• Resection of pancreatic tail
• Longitudinal incision of pancreatic duct along
body of pancreas
• Anastomosis with Roux-en-Y loop of jejenum
(Lateral PJ)
• Splenectomy
19. Puestow’s Procedure(LPJ)
• Indication:
– Dilated ducts (at least 5-7mm) or multiple areas of
stricturing & dilatation throughout length
– Without associated inflammatory mass in head
– Obstructing intraductal stones
– Pancreatic Pseudocyst
20. Puestow’s Procedure
• Advantage:
– Allows for adequate decompression of dilated
pancreatic duct
– Minimizes morbidity , mortality of pancreatic resection
– Preservation of endocrine function
• Limitations:
– Neither feasible nor effcacious unless PD at least 5-7mm
– Inflammatory pancreatic head mass
22. • Advantage of pure drainage procedure:
– Pain relief in 75-80% case in 5-10 years f/u
– Well preserved pancreatic function
• But, Recurrence of symptoms on long term due to
incomplete decompression of MPD in head
• So, replaced by procedure that combine resection
and drainage procedures
23. Resection Procedures
– Indications
• Focal disease, confined to head of pancreas
(except in distal pancreatectomy)
• Suspicious malignant lesion
• Obstructive complication developed by fibrosis
• Non dilated duct
– Disadvantages
• Endocrine insufficiency
24. Whipples PD
– Resection of the head of the
pancreas+distal CBD+distal
stomach+duodenum
+proximal jejunum
– Also treat bileduct stricture
and duodenal obstruction
– Done when there is suspicion of
tumor in pancreatic head
26. Distal pancreatectomy
– Isolated involvement of body and tail; suspicion of left sided
neoplasm
– With or without splenectomy
– Stump closure by sutures or stapler application or by creating a
Roux-en-Y pancreatojejunostomy
– Post-operative outcome is similar in both groups
– Drainage procedure should be reserved for patients with a
dilated duct and/or a stricture in the pancreatic head
27. – Major portion of parenchyma remains untreated
– High risk of recurrence, Pancreatic insufficiency
– Requirement of completion pancreatectomy in 13%
28. Total pancreatectomy with islet
autotransplantation (TPIAT)
• Diffuse parenchymal disease
• Failure of other surgeries
• Includes resection of duodenum, distal bile
duct, spleen along with total pancreatectomy
– Care taken to preserve arterial blood supply (GDA,
splenic artery) for as long as possible to minimize
islet cell ischemia
– Islet cell harvesting
– Direct islet cell infusion into portal vein
29. Total pancreatectomy with islet
autotransplantation (TPIAT)
• 27 percent achieving insulin independence
• ~73% pts pain relief (narcotic independence)
Wilson et al; 2014
30. Duodenum Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection
(DPPHR)
• For benign lesion like CP, no reason to remove
organs adjacent to pancreas (except inability
to R/O malignancy )
• Advantage (compared to ppPD)
– Greater weight gain
– Better glucose tolerance (Higher insulin secretion)
– Low early and late mortality rate
31. Beger’s Procedure
• Divison of neck overlying confluence of splenic
and SMV + Removal of Head of pancreas leaving
small rim of pancreatic tissue along duodenum
• Roux-en-y jejunal loop
Anastomosed to
Pancreatic tail remnant &
Excavated head
• Technically demanding procedure
32. Berne Modification of DPPHR
–Pancreas is not divided at level of portal vein
–Useful in significant inflammation of head and Portal HTN
–Single anastomosis b/w jejunal loop & pancreatic
resection rim at head
–Equal outcome compare to Beger’s
But few required re-operation for
Ongoing pancreatitis
33. Frey’s Procedure
• Resection (Coring) in Pancreatic head is smaller
than Beger’s
• MPD is drained longitudinally for its full length
into pancreatic tail
• Reconstruction by single anastomosis between
Roux limb of jejenum & PD and head defect
(Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy)
34. • Advantage
– Can also treat duct disease in pancreatic remnant
– Coring out pancreatic head appears to be safer than
resection when portal HTN or thrombosis present
35. Disadvantage: Rim of pancreatic tissue of pancreatic head
with active disease is left in place
36.
37. IZBICKI PROCEDURE
• Longitudinal V shaped excision of
ventral pancreas
– Secondary & tertiary ducts
draining in to the Roux loop of
jejunum
– Done in small duct disease
38. • Comparison of results (PD vs Beger’s vs Frey)
– Study of 43 patients by Klempa et al
• DPPHR patients had a shorter hospital stay, greater
weight gain, less post operative diabetes, and exocrine
dysfunction than standard Whipple patients
• Pain control was similar between two groups
• Klempa I, Spatny M, Menzel J, et al. Chirurg.1995;66:350 –359
39. Biliary stricture a/w Chronic Pancreatitis
• Chronic scarring and fibrosis of head of
pancreas lead to external compression of
intrapancreatic part of CBD
– If cholangitis – Urgent ERCP + Temporary biliary
decompression
– In whom malignancy can’t be excluded – PD
– If malignancy excluded – Roux-en-Y HJ
41. Pseudocyst
• If Symptomatic:
– Endoscopic :: Cystogastrostomy or
cystoduodenostomy
– Surgery : Cystojejunostomy with Roux-en-Y
reconstruction
42.
43. Take home message
– Pain relief and quality of life - main concern in
treatment of chronic pancreatitis
– Surgery is indicated for relief of intractable pain
and complications associated with CP
– Timing of surgery should be individualized on a
patient to patient basis
44. – Patients with a dilated main pancreatic duct (≥6 to
7 mm) drainage procedure: lateral
pancreaticojejunostomy (LPJ) or Frey procedure
– With a nondilated main pancreatic duct and
inflammatory mass in head : DPPHR is less
invasive than PD and comparable long term
results
45. Refrences
1.Blumgart’s Surgery of Liver, Pancreas and
Biliary Tract; 6th edition
2. Fischer's Mastery of Surgery, 7th edition
3.Surgery in chronic pancreatitis: Indication, Timing
and procedures; Bouwense et al, Vis Med 2019
Editor's Notes
Continuous inflammatory disease of pancreas
characterised by irreversible morphologic
changes [[irregular fibrosis, acinar and islet
cells loss,inflammatory infiltrates,stone
formation]]of both the parenchyma and
ducts;typically coupled with permanent loss of
function +/-pain
Incidence
– Indian scenario
• 115-200 / 1,00,000 people
• Idiopathic – Most common
20-40k units before meal and 10-20 k units for snack
Proximal stenosis and no calcification
Stenting::: Suppurative infection and worsen periductal inflammation
Dilatation, stone removal
If 2 or 3 repettitve endoscopic fail---surgery
Without significant biliary obstruction
Timing of surgery
Non-surgical management as long as possible to avoid surgical complications
Better pain relief with early surgical drainage
Decision regarding timing of surgery be individualized on a patient to patient basis.
With failure of medical management, counsel regarding the risks and benefits of both modalities.
Initially described in conjunction with splenectomy and the distal pancreatectomy
Minimizes pancreatic insufficiency
45%
Used in after necrotizing pancreatitis, after seat belt injuries/trauma causing ‘disconnected duct syndrome’ with lpcalised CP towards tail
Include resection of duodenum,distal bile duct, spleen …pylorus preservation
60-70% insulin independence in fischers
Leaving a rim of 5 mm of residual pancreatic tissue along medial border of duodenum and between 5 and 10mm AT FLOOR
Less intra-operative bleeding
Absence of enlarged PD
Duodenum-sparing resection of pancreatic
head, without division of the neck of the
pancreas combined with longitudinal
pancreaticojejunostomy of the dorsal duct
Appears advantageous in patient with less severe inflammation in pancreatic head with obstruction in left sided Pancreatic duct
Decreased risk of hemorrhage
For pt with isolated pseudocyst and hx of severe epsiode of AP
Surgical therapy provides effective long-term pain relief and
improvement of quality of life, but it may not stop the decline
of endocrine or exocrine pancreatic function
Surgical options
Resection, Decompression procedures, Hybrid procedures
DPPHR and LR+LPJ are superior to resection in term of
Post-operative outcome,
Quality of life
Pain control,
Glucose tolerance
Weight gain
Shorter OT time
Less blood loss
Bern’s DPPHR is technically simpler, as reflected by a significantly shorter operative time and a significantly shorter hospital stay
It has broader acceptance in the future because of technical and economic advantages