1. GHRIS - Stage 3 APAC Rollout Current Phase: Build
MeasurementsAgainstPlan
Actual Percent
Complete
(Total Project)
Actual Percent
Complete
(This Phase)
Planned Percent
Complete
(Total Project)
Planned Percent
Complete
(This Phase)
Ahead/On
Track/Behind
61% 83% 60% 81% On Track
High-Level AssessmentofProjectHealth
Schedule: Cost: Quality: Overall:
Task CompletionsThisPeriod
 Collectedthe global andlocal datafromcountries
 ConverteddatainpreparationforSystemsIntegrationTesting
 Unit testedall outboundvendorinterfaces(exceptRAMCO)
Work In Progress
 Prepfor SIT – testscenarios,secure responsibilities,setupof the environment
PlannedCompletionsforNextPeriod
 SIT WeekOne (Onsite) –Complete
 Finish1st
round of data evaluationandfixes
 RefreshANHUfromProduction
Current Risks & Issues
Type Category Description Effects Actions Taken / Mitigations
Issue Quality Malaysia,Lanka and
Thailandwere late in
gettingtheirconversion
extractsto us (2 weeks).
Thisforcedus to skipkey
data review/qualitysteps.
Many data defectshave
beenreported.
Higher
defect
rate on
all
RICEW
Objects,
Interface
Failure
1.) Yousuf Admani (HRIS) isfull
time assignedtogetcountry
data cleanedup
2.) Deloitte will runasecondpass
of the data afterSIT cleanup
effortson18-Mar
3.) We have three calendarweeks
betweenSITendandUAT
begintoget to a betterstate
Issue Cost The implementationteam
wantsanotherinstance to
performUAT efforts
More $$ 1.) Launcheda CR withScott
JohnsonanCore Services
2.) The program can absorb the
additional costs
Issue Cost In orderto complywith
Ansell policy,the setups
done inthe additional
instance will needtobe
re-done inANHUand
regressiontested.
More $$ 1.) Deloitte isresearchingthe
additional laborcostandwill
revertback withanestimate
Issue Calendar,
Quality
The independent
contractor hiredtomodify
the RAMCO applicationto
accept data fromthe
Oracle HCM application
can onlydeliveronMarch
20th
, well pastourwindow
Calendar
Variance
1.) We will launchaseparate
QA/SITeffortforthisinterface
2.) The contractor will notbend
on schedule,claiming
bandwidthissues

2. to testinterfaces
GHRIS - Phase 3 Cloud
Compensation
Current Phase: Design
MeasurementsAgainstPlan
Actual Percent
Complete
(Total Project)
Actual Percent
Complete
(This Phase)
Planned Percent Complete
(Total Project)
Planned Percent
Complete
(This Phase)
Ahead/On
Track/Behind
37% 94% 41% 100% On Track
High-Level AssessmentofProjectHealth
Scope: Calendar: Cost/
Quality:
Overall:
Task CompletionsThisPeriod
Functional Specificationssignedoff forall reports(LATE)
Work In Progress
Functional SpecsforEBS >> Fusion>> EBS Interfacesinreview (LATE)
Technical SpecsforEBS >> Fusion>> EBS Interfacesinreview(LATE)
Technical SpecificationsforRICEWObjects(mostlyreports)
BuildforFast Formulas
Change Managementactivities(new SoP’s,flows,e.g.)
PlannedCompletionsforNextPeriod
SignOff for Functional SpecsforEBS>> Fusion >> EBS Interfaces(LATE)
Current Risks & Issues
Type Category Description Effects Actions Taken / Mitigations
Risk Calendar Fusion(eComp) hasa
hard deadline of 6/30 in
orderto deliverforthis
year’scompcycle
Calendar
Overruns,
Rescheduling
to NextYear
1.) Deloitte andAnsellare
activelymanagingthe
interdependenciesbetween
the APACand Fusion
Projects
Risk Technical FusionDependson
provisionof converted
EBS data for APACto be
successful;variance in
conversionfordelivery
for Stage 3 could
negativelyaffectthe
FusionProject
Calendar
Overruns,
Rescheduling
to NextYear
1.) We have a mitigation
strategyinplace to extract
requiredFusiondatafrom
Deloitte templates
2.) ThisRiskis the reasonI’ve
placedFusionin“yellow”
status
Issue Functional Ansell isabout3 weeks
late inapproving
Functional
SpecificationsforFusion
Interfaces
Delaysin
Build
1.) Deloitte hascalculatedthat
theycan make up the Build
time (fornow)
2.) I’ve alertedthe PMOand
Vikrant/Jeff thatthisisa
priority.

3. GHRIS - Stage 2 EMEA/LAC Rollout Current Phase: Operate
MeasurementsAgainstPlan
Actual Percent
Complete
(Total Project)
Actual Percent
Complete
(This Phase)
Planned Percent
Complete
(Total Project)
Planned Percent
Complete
(This Phase)
Ahead/On
Track/Behind
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
High-Level AssessmentofProjectHealth
Scope: Calendar: Cost/
Quality:
Overall:
Task CompletionsThisPeriod
 Brazil – completedcorrectionstocontactrecords forADP Interface
 Brazil – code for loadingcontactrecordswas migratedtoPROD
Work In Progress
 Interface Parallel Testing(see below fordetails)
Interface name No. of error records
on the latestinterface
file
1st
Payroll Parallel
Run Status
2nd
Payroll
Parallel Run
Status
France –
Comasec
0(2nd
Payroll Parallel
Count)
Successful Successful
Mexico– Fortia 5(2nd
Payroll Parallel
Count)
Successful Successful
Belgium–SD
WORX
3(1st Payroll Parallel
Count)
Successful Errors in Source
RecordsNeedto
be correctedin
orderto run
Brazil – ADP 277(1st
Payroll Parallel
Count)
Successful Corrected
Contactsto be
movedintoPROD
Portugal – PHC 1(1st
Payroll Parallel
Count)
Successful Connectivity
Issues
Lithuania– Alga
2000
0(2nd
Payroll Parallel
Count)
Successful Successful
 Steady – State Defect(see detailsbelow);manyitemshave beenfixedandmigratedto
production.Yousuf isworkingwithDeloitte tochange status onthese itemsto“closed”.
Week-over-weekchange:-2Open+2 Closed(bothcategories)

4. PlannedCompletionsforNextPeriod
 Brazil – CorrectedContactrecordswill be loadedandthe parallel rerun
 Belgium–Lesleywill correctsource HCMrecords; rerunthe parallel
 Portugal – resolve connectivityproblemswithFTPsite andrerun
 Applicationandtestingof language packs(BrazilianPortuguese,FrenchandSimplified
Chinese) toSIT,UAT priorto eventual rollouttoProduction.(ETCMarch 17th
)
Current Risks & Issues
Type Category Description Effects Actions Taken / Mitigations
Issue Technical Connectivityproblems
withthe Portugal Payroll
Vendor
Delay
in
Rollout
1.) Scott Johnson’s teamhasbeen
alertedandisactivelyworking
thisissue.Potentiallya
passwordproblem.
GHRIS – MSS / ESS Rollout Current Phase: Transition
MeasurementsAgainstPlan
Actual Percent
Complete
(Total Project)
Actual Percent
Complete
(This Phase)
Planned Percent
Complete
(Total Project)
Planned Percent
Complete
(This Phase)
Ahead/On
Track/Behind
29% 30% 48% 73% Behind
High-Level AssessmentofProjectHealth
Ansell GHRIS Project Status Measurements
Phase 2 Stage 2 Steady State Date: 3/11/2015
Closed Open
Ready for
retest
In
Progress
Closed Open
Ready for
retest
In
Progress
Totals
Core HR 5 9 0 0 12 14 0 0 40
Report 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 5
Self-
Service
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
HR 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
5 9 2 0 12 21 1 0 50
P2 P3
Module

5. Scope: Calendar: Cost/
Quality:
Overall:
Task CompletionsThisPeriod
 HRIT (Kiran) developedqueriestoidentifymissingdataandpassedoverto HRIS
 Finalizedthe scope objectivesandapproachforthe project(phasedfunctionalityrolloutfor
the pilots)
 Completedprojectplanandgotagreementfromkeystakeholders(Jeff,Vikrant,Kiran)
Work In Progress
 Identificationandremediationof incorrectdataonthe currentProductionHCMapplication
for NorthAmerica,EMEA and LAC(LATE)
 Reviewof currenttrainingandSOPcollateral forESS/MSS
PlannedCompletionsforNextPeriod
 Contact the Global headsof PilotDepartments
 Developcommunicationof rolloutforthe pilotpopulation
Current Risks & Issues
Type Category Description Effects Actions Taken / Mitigations
Risk Quality,
Calendar
Employee andManager
Self Service have been
identifiedaskeytoolsfor
cleansingdataforthe
FusionCompProject;thus
ESS/MSS rolloutisonthat
project’scritical path
Calendar
Slippage,
Data
Quality
Issues
1.) The ESS/MSS rolloutis
enqueuedwell aheadof the
FusionUAT effort(slack)
Issue Scope The newapproach
involvingacascade of
functionality(EEinquiry,
EE Update,Mgr Inquiry,
MGR Update) requires
that we add tasksand
calendarto the plan
Possible
Calendar
Riskto
Other
Projects
1.) SDR Will re-baselineand
conferwithEarl onpotential
knockon effects
Issue Calendar Verylittle progresshas
beenmade tocleansing
the ProductionDatabase
of missingorincorrect
data
Data
Quality