Msn565 signature assignment rubric asl v1 course nursing lea

1. MSN565 Signature Assignment Rubric ASL v1
Course: Nursing Leadership And Health Policy - CFG - 08-31-
21 - Sect8
Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaches
Expectation
Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Criterion Score
Policy
Challenge
Statement
Weight: 30%
/ 810 points
Default=0
Range=0-62

2. Policy
challenge/proble
m statement is
unclear, weak or
missing. The
presentation
does not
describe key
stakeholders, the
agenda, or the
interview with
the nurse
leader/nursing
association/orga
nization.
63 points
Default=63
Range=63-71

3. Basic
introduction of
policy
challenge/proble
m. States
problem but
lacks support.
The challenge
statement is
somewhat clear
and arguable, but
briefly mentions
the key
stakeholders, and
does not discuss
each
stakeholder’s
role and the

4. agenda
adequately.
Briefly discusses
the interview
with the nurse
leader/nursing
association/orga
nization.
72 points
Default=72
Range=72-80
Proficiently
makes a policy
challenge/proble
m statement that
is relevant. The
challenge
statement is a

5. clear and
arguable
statement of
position.
Mentions the key
stakeholders and
their roles and
the agenda.
Describes the
interview with
the nurse
leader/nursing
association/orga
nization.
81 points
Default=81
Range=81-90
Total D2L Point

6. Value=90
Exceptional
policy
challenge/proble
m statement that
grabs interest of
reader and states
topic, is
exceptionally
clear, arguable,
well-developed,
and a definitive
statement.
Exceptionally
defines the key
stakeholders and
their roles and
the agenda. The

7. interview with
the nurse
leader/nursing
association/orga
nization leaves
the reader with a
clear
understanding of
the situation.
Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaches
Expectation
Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Criterion Score

8. Quality of
Information or
Evidence
Weight: 25%
/ 680 points
Default=0
Range=0-52
Information does
not relate to the
main topic.
Presentation is
not researched in
sufficient detail
and from a
variety of
sources. All
necessary
content is not

9. included. Does
not list the
different
strategies that
the organization
plans to or has
already used to
inform/lobby
legislators. Does
not describe two
or three
strategies used
to inform
legislators. Does
not list and
describe any
non-legislative
strategies that

10. were used or
plan to be used
to support the
initiative.
53 points
Default=53
Range=53-59
Information
relates to the
main topic. But
the presentation
is missing
sufficient detail
from a variety of
sources; key
components of
content may be
missing. The

11. presentation is
missing the
different
strategies that
the
organization/indi
vidual plans to or
has already used
to inform/lobby
legislators. A
description of
any non-
legislative
strategies that
were used or
plan to be used
may be missing.
60 points

12. Default=60
Range=60-67
Information
relates to the
main topic. The
presentation is
researched in
sufficient detail
and from a
variety of
sources. All
necessary
content is
included. Lists
the different
strategies that
the organization
plans to or has

13. already used to
inform/lobby
legislators.
Describes two or
three strategies
used to inform
legislators. Lists
and describes
any non-
legislative
strategies that
were used or
plan to be used
to support the
initiative.
68 points
Default=68
Range=68-75

14. Total D2L point
Value=75
Presentation is
exceptionally
researched,
extremely
detailed, and
accurate.
Information
clearly relates to
the challenge
statement.
Appropriate
content is
covered in depth
without being
redundant. Lists
and describes in

15. detail at least
four different
legislative and
non-legislative
strategies that
the organization
plans to or has
already used to
inform/lobby
legislators.
Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaches
Expectation
Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Criterion Score

16. Support of
Analysis
Weight: 25%
/ 68
Quality of
Written/Oral
Communicatio
n Weight: 10%
/ 28
0 points
Default=0
Range=0-52
Limited or no
connections
made between
evidence. Lacks
analysis. Does
not describe

17. where this policy
challenge is in
the legislative
process and its
implications for
the future.
53 points
Default=53
Range=53-59
Some
connections have
been made
between
evidence and
analysis. Minimal
analysis is
evident, but does
not provide

18. detailed support
for the challenge
statement.
Briefly describes
where this policy
challenge is in
the legislative
process and its
implications for
the future.
60 points
Default=60
Range=60-67
Consistent
connections
made between
evidence and the
analysis which

19. sufficiently
supports the
challenge
statement
Describes where
this policy
challenge is in
the legislative
process.
Implications for
the future are
logical and
insightful.
68 points
Default=68
Range=68-75
Total D2L point
Value=75

20. Exceptionally
critical, relevant,
and consistent
connections
made between
evidence and
analysis.
Excellent analysis
is evident of
describing where
this policy
challenge is in
the legislative
process and its
implications for
the future.
0 points
Default=0

21. Range=0-20
Style and voice
inappropriate or
do not address
given audience,
purpose, etc.
Word choice is
excessively
redundant,
clichéd, and
unspecific.
Presentation is
not recorded.
Inconsistent
grammar,
spelling,
punctuation, and
21 points

22. Default=21
Range=21-23
Style and voice
are somewhat
appropriate to
the given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is often
unspecific,
generic,
redundant, and
clichéd.
Presentation is
recorded and is
3-5 minutes.
Repetitive
mechanical

23. 24 points
Default=24
Range=24-27
Style and voice
are appropriate
to the given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is specific
and purposeful,
and somewhat
varied
throughout.
Presentation is
recorded 5-10
minutes. Minimal
mechanical or
typographical

24. errors are
28 points
Default=28
Range=28-30
Total D2L Point
Value=30
Style and voice
are not only
appropriate to
the given
audience and
purpose, but also
show originality
and creativity.
Presentation is
recorded 5-10
minutes. Free of
mechanical and

25. typographical
errors. A variety
Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaches
Expectation
Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Criterion Score
paragraphing.
Delivery
techniques
(posture,
gestures, eye
contact, vocals)
detract from
understandability

26. of presentation
and speaker
appears nervous
and
uncomfortable.
APA format is
not evident in
the references
slide.
errors distract
the reader.
Information is
repeated and
somewhat
disorganized;
delivery
techniques make
speaker appear

27. tentative and
unsure. There are
missing APA
elements or
some are
incorrectly
formatted
throughout the
presentation.
present, but are
not overly
distracting to the
reader. Delivery
techniques make
speaker appear
comfortable.
Mostly accurate
APA formatting

28. of the references
slide is evident.
of sentence
structures and
effective figures
of speech are
used. Writer is
clearly in
command of
standard,
written,
academic
English. Delivery
techniques make
speaker appear
confident and
polished;
language/word

29. choices are
imaginative,
memorable, and
compelling to
support the
effectiveness of
the presentation.
Completely
accurate APA
formatting of the
references slide
is evident.
Total / 272
Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaches
Expectation

30. Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Criterion Score
Use of
Multimedia,
Graphics,
Diagrams,
and/or
Illustrations
Weight: 5%
/ 13.5
Presentation
Organization
Weight: 5%
/ 13.5
0 points
Default=0

31. Range=0-9.5
Does not include
required
multimedia,
graphics,
diagrams, and/or
illustrations or
they are
irrelevant to
topic or detract
from slide
content or
presentation as a
whole.
10.5 points
Default=10.5
Range=10.5-11
Required

32. multimedia,
graphics,
diagrams, and/or
illustrations are
generally
relevant but
some may not
appropriately
support the slide
content.
12 points
Default=12
Range=12-12.5
Required
multimedia,
graphics,
diagrams, and/or
illustrations are

33. highly relevant
and acceptably
support the slide
content; sized
and positioned
appropriately.
13.5 points
Default=13.5
Range=13.5-15
Total D2L Point
Value=15
Required
multimedia,
graphics,
diagrams, and/or
illustrations add
clarity and
sophistication to

34. the presentation
content; they
improve the
effectiveness of
the presentation.
0 points
Default=0
Range=0-9.5
Organization
pattern (specific
introduction/con
clusion,
sequenced
material within
the body, and
transitions) is not
observable
within the

35. presentation.
10.5 points
Default=10.5
Range=10.5-11
Organization
pattern is
intermittently
observable
within the
presentation
12 points
Default=12
Range=12-12.5
Organization
pattern is clear
and observable
within the
presentation.

36. 13.5 points
Default=13.5
Range=13.5-15
Total D2L Point
Value=15
Organization
pattern is skillful
and permits a
cohesiveness in
the presentation.
Overall Score
Does Not Meet
Expectations
0 points minimum
Approaches
Expectation
211 points minimum
Meets

37. Expectations
240 points
minimum
Exceeds
Expectations
272 points minimum