1. HUM 115 All Assignments
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
HUM 115 Assignment Week 1 Critical Thinking Worksheet
HUM 115 Assignment Week 2 Reason, Emotion, and Communication in
Everyday Critical Thinking
HUM 115 Assignment Week 3 Identifying Fallacies Assessment
HUM 115 Assignment Week 4 Arguments
HUM 115 Assignment Week 5 Applying Critical Thinking Reflection
*****************************
HUM 115 Assignment Week 1 Critical Thinking
Worksheet
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Developing critical thinking skills is an important journey. This week,
you were introduced to the topic of critical thinking and had the
2. opportunity to complete a self-evaluation related to your critical thinking
skills. You also learned about the barriers that one can encounter in
critical thinking and the characteristics of a good critical thinker. This
assignment will help you to put it all together and apply what you have
learned to your own life.
Critical Thinking Worksheet
Write a 75- to 125-word response to each of the following prompts:
1. Review the definition of critical thinking on p. 6 of Think. What is
the role of critical thinking in daily life? What is an example of a
situation in which you can utilize critical thinking in your own life, and
how can critical thinking help in this situation?
<Enter your response here.>
2. Explain at least two common barriers to critical thinking, and
provide an example of when you encountered each barrier.
<Enter your response here.>
3. Review the self-evaluation questionnaire that you completed on p. 7
of Think, along with the meaning of your responses on p. 435 of Think.
Reflect on your results related to the following characteristics of a good
critical thinker:
o Analytical Skills
o Effective Communication
o Research Inquiry Skills
o Flexibility and Tolerance for Ambiguity
o Open-Minded Skepticism
o Creative Problem-Solving
o Attention, Mindfulness, and Curiosity
o Collaborative Learning
Which areas may you need to improve? How can you enhance these
skills?
<Enter your response here.>
*****************************
3. HUM 115 Assignment Week 2 Reason, Emotion,
and Communication in Everyday Critical
Thinking
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This week's readings and activities focused on how reason, emotion, and
communication may influence critical thinking. In this assignment, you
will identify the concepts of reason, emotion, and communication in
your everyday critical thinking practices and compile them in a
Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation template that is provided for you.
Ensure you have installed Microsoft® Office 365 prior to beginning this
assignment. The University provides this for you through
PhoenixConnect. If you do not already have this program installed,
go to Office 365 ProPlus & Email Support and follow the 5 steps to
install Office 365 on your computer.
Review the Microsoft® PowerPoint® video tutorials from the Media
Library for additional assistance.
Complete the Reason, Emotion, and Communication in Everyday
Critical Thinking Presentation Template. Instructions for what to include
are provided in the speaker notes section for each slide, which can be
accessed by clicking the "View" tab at the top, and clicking "Notes." The
speaker notes represent what you would say in regard to each slide were
you to give the presentation in person. You may add pictures and
graphics to enhance your presentation, and you are welcome to change
the design layout of the presentation.
4. ReviewPC - PowerPoint 2013 - View Speaker Notes and PC -
PowerPoint - View Speaker Notes for additional details on adding
Presenter Notes to your presentation.
Submit your assignment.
Important Note: Students at the Local Campuses will deliver their
presentations in class and do not need to include Presenter's Notes.
*****************************
HUM 115 Assignment Week 3 Identifying
Fallacies Assessment
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
In this week's readings and activities, you learned about errors in
thinking and informal fallacies. Both of these can occur in arguments
and affect the overall quality of the argument.
Review the following Exercises in Ch. 5 of Think: Critical Thinking and
Logic Skills for Everyday Life:
Exercise 5-2 (p.140)
Exercise 5-3 (p.151)
Exercise 5-4 (p.160)
Note: You can find the answers to these Exercises on p. 424
of Think: Critical Thinking and Logic Skills for Everyday Life.
Complete the Identifying Fallacies Assessment by following the
instructions within the assessment. The final page of the assessment will
provide you with a summary of your score and a confirmation that your
5. results have been sent to your faculty member. You will not need to
submit anything additional.
Note: You will have 1 attempt at each question. If you leave the
assessment before it is completed, your progress will be saved, but you
cannot revisit any questions that have already been completed.
*****************************
HUM 115 Assignment Week 4 Arguments
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
As a critical thinker, it is important to understand the elements of an
argument and how certain types of statements can affect the validity of
an argument. As you learned in the readings this week, arguments are
used to convince us of an outcome. You read about how to identify an
issue, the role that issues play in arguments, how to differentiate
between an argument and rhetoric, and the different types of arguments
you may encounter. In this assignment, you will choose an issue to
evaluate, then respond to questions about the issue you selected.
Complete the Arguments Worksheet.
Submit your assignment.
Arguments Worksheet
Select one of the following articles and use the hyperlinks below to
access it from Opposing Viewpoints in Context:
6. • Health Care Issues
• Compensation for College Athletes
• Technology and Society
• Social Media
• Advertising
Write a 25- to 50-word response to each of the following prompts:
1. What is the issue in the argument you selected?
<Enter your response here.>
2. Provide an unbiased explanation of all viewpoints or premises of
the issue.
<Enter your response here.>
3. Which viewpoint or premise is weak or irrelevant? Explain why.
<Enter your response here.>
4. Is the argument inductive or deductive? Why?
<Enter your response here.>
5. What is the value of understanding multiple viewpoints before
forming an opinion or argument?
<Enter your response here.>
6. Provide an APA-formatted reference for the article you
reviewed. Use the Citation Tools link in the Tools section to the right of
the article for assistance, and select “APA, 6th Edition” from the drop-
down menu.
<Enter your response here.>
*****************************
HUM 115 Assignment Week 5 Applying Critical
Thinking Reflection
7. Over the past five weeks you have learned about different elements
related to critical thinking. You related the concepts to your personal
experiences, and evaluated your critical thinking skills. You've identified
fallacies, evaluated arguments, and learned the role of these concepts in
your daily life. Now it's time to apply the concepts together. In this
assignment, you will review a real-world scenario and apply the critical
thinking skills you have developed.
Review the Critical Thinking Scenario.
Write a 350- to 700-word reflection on the scenario, using the
Reflection Template. Follow the instructions within the template to
complete your reflection. You will need to include an introduction
paragraph to introduce your reader to the topics you will be discussing; 3
body paragraphs, each with specific questions that need to be addressed
within; and a conclusion paragraph to bring your paper to a close.
Note: The Reflection Template is already formatted appropriately, and
you do not need to make any changes to the format. Be sure to
demonstrate your critical thinking abilities in your responses to the
questions, and ensure your paper flows well from topic to topic.
Submit your assignment.
Critical Thinking Scenario
Sally is a 34-year-old woman who works in the customer service
department for a small company that sells printers. Her job involves
speaking with customers and addressing their concerns for 8 hours a
day. Unfortunately for Sally, customers only reach out to her
department when there is an issue with their printers.
After a long day of listening to customer complaints, she felt drained and
agitated. She wanted to relax, so she went to dinner with some
colleagues. The colleagues began discussing an issue at work that was
causing friction between departments. Sally did not agree with her
colleagues’ viewpoint on the causes of that friction, but she did not want
to say anything because she felt that she did not know enough about the
topic. She decided that after this dinner, she would not spend time with
these colleagues outside of work anymore. For the remaining part of the
8. discussion, Sally nodded her head and appeared to agree with her
colleagues in order to avoid confrontation.
The next day at work, Sally spoke with a customer who disagreed with
the warranty policy of the company. The customer explained to Sally
that he understood the terms of the warranty, but he described how vital
his printer was to his business. He went on to share how the ability to
print materials equated to his ability to put food on the table for his
family. He asked if there was anything that Sally could do to help. Sally
imagined herself in the customer’s position, and decided to look into
additional options for the customer. In the end, Sally was able to de-
escalate the situation and assist the customer.
This interaction with the customer led her to question their warranty, and
she decided to speak with her manager to see if it could be changed. She
stated that the current warranty policy was inadequate because it did not
provide customers with enough time to determine if the product would
function appropriately. She provided supporting evidence to show that
many printers failed only 1 month after the 1-year warranty expired. She
also calculated the number of those customers with failed printers that
did buy a replacement printer from the company Sally worked for. Sally
proposed that the warranty be extended to 18 months. Unfortunately her
manager did not agree with her argument, and replied to her by asking:
“How can you be arguing for change in policy when you are late to work
most of the time?” However, the manager did not provide an argument
against extending the warranty, so Sally decided she would continue to
argue for changing the warranty with the company’s leadership. After
several meetings with the company’s owner, Sally was able to get her
proposal approved and the warranties extended.
*****************************
9. HUM 115 Week 1 Grappling and Grit
Paper (2 Papers)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
HUM 115 Week 1 Grappling and Grit Paper (2 Papers)
Resource: APA Title Page template
Part I: Grappling
Watch the Grappling video.
Write a 100- to 175-word reflection on grappling that includes
responses to each of the following questions:
· What is grappling and why is it important?
· How does grappling relate to your learning?
· How does grappling relate to your ability to think critically?
· How can critical thinking improve your ability to grapple and
achieve your desired goals and outcomes?
Part 2: Grit
in 100-175 words, the student wrote a response to the following
questions, how might increasing your great help improve your grappling
abilities
*****************************
10. HUM 115 Week 2 Assignment Art Exploration
Reflection (Both Members of This Club)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
HUM 115 Assignment Art Exploration Reflection (Both Members of
This Club)
*****************************
HUM 115 Week 2 Assignment Art Exploration
Reflection(AMOR)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
HUM 115 Assignment Art Exploration Reflection(AMOR)
*****************************
11. HUM 115 Week 2 Point of View Research Study
(Obesity)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
HUM 115 Week 2 Point of View Research Study (Obesity)
*****************************
HUM 115 Week 3 Topical Debate (Obesity)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Topical Debate Worksheet
Directions:
In this assignment, you will follow a three-step process to construct
opposing arguments to debate on your approved topic from Week 1. In
the fourth and final step you will reflect on what you learned in this
assignment.
12. Step 1: Identify the components of accurate arguments.
• What are the components of accurate arguments?
Step 2: Generate a well-constructed argument.
Respond to the following prompts
• Construct an argument for your argument on your approved topic.
Make sure that you cite your sources.
• Construct an argument against your approved topic. Make sure
that you cite your sources.
Step 3: Identify points to debate.
Before coming to a decision it is important to consider multiple
perspectives, weighing the pros and cons of both sides of an argument
and their respective solutions. In considering each side of the debate, be
sure to focus on the implications and the consequences of implementing
each side's proposed solution.
To complete this step, insert pros and cons of each solution in the
respective columns in the following table.
Argument For
PROS
CONS
*****************************
13. HUM 115 Week 4 Fallacies (1000 Words, New
Syllabus )
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
HUM 115 Week 4 Fallacies (1000 Words)
*****************************
HUM 115 Week 4 Problem Solving (1000 Words)
(New Syllabus)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
HUM 115 Week 4 Problem Solving (1000 Words)
*****************************
14. HUM 115 Week 5 Diversity, Ethics and Problem
Solving in Obesity
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with speaker notes on
your approved topic from Week 2. With approval from faculty, you may
use an alternative presentation tool.
Include the following in your presentation:
• Role of Diversity in Critical Thinking (2 slides)
• Explain the role of diversity in critical thinking.
• Provide examples of diversity as it relates to your topic.
• Ethics in the Reasoning Process (2 slides)
• Explain the ethics in the reasoning process.
• Provide examples of ethics as it relates to your topic.
• Role of Critical Thinking in Solving a Problem (2 slides)
• Explain the role of critical thinking as a means to problem solving.
• Provide examples of how critical thinking in problem solving relates to
your topic.
• Making Sense of the Three Focal Areas (for example, the role of
diversity in critical thinking, ethics in the reasoning process, and the role
of critical thinking in solving a problem)
• Considering all the coursework presented in this class, what solution
would you propose for your topic, and why? If you believe there is no
solution, explain in detail why you believe that no solution can exist. (1
slide)
15. • Personal Application (1 slide)
• Reflect upon how the role of diversity in critical thinking works in
your life.
• Reflect upon how the role of ethics in the reasoning process works in
your life.
• Reflect upon how the role of critical thinking in solving a problem
works in your life.
*****************************