Rubric Assessment Top of Form This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Evaluation Criteria No Evidence 0 points 0 % Unsatisfactory 45 points 45 % Emerging 51 points 51 % Proficient 58 points 58 % Exemplary 65 points 65 % Explained the legal reporting requirements for providers, suppliers, and payers in your state. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers, suppliers, and payers in your state are missing or inaccurate. Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers, suppliers, and payers in your state are vague or incomplete. Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers, suppliers, and payers in your state are somewhat vague or incomplete. Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers, suppliers, and payers in your state are complete and comprehensive. Clear Override Override / 65 / 65 * Criterion score has been overridden Described the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator are missing or inaccurate. Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator are vague or incomplete. Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator are somewhat vague or incomplete. Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator are complete and comprehensive. Clear Override Override / 65 / 65 * Criterion score has been overridden Described an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations are missing or inaccurate. Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations are vague or incomplete. Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations are present but more could have been used to provide better application to the issue. Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations are present to support the issue. Clear Override Override / 65 / 65 * Criterion score has been overridden Su.

1. Rubric Assessment
Top of Form
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Evaluation Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
0 %
Unsatisfactory
45 points
45 %
Emerging
51 points
51 %
Proficient
58 points
58 %
Exemplary
65 points
65 %
Explained the legal reporting requirements for providers,
suppliers, and payers in your state.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers,
suppliers, and payers in your state are missing or inaccurate.
Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers,
suppliers, and payers in your state are vague or incomplete.
Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers,

2. suppliers, and payers in your state are somewhat vague or
incomplete.
Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers,
suppliers, and payers in your state are complete and
comprehensive.
Clear Override
Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Described the legal reporting obligations that impact the health
care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the
health care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator are missing or inaccurate.
Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the
health care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator are vague or incomplete.
Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the
health care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator are somewhat vague or incomplete.
Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the
health care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator are complete and comprehensive.
Clear Override

3. Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Described an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal
reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the
legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations are missing or inaccurate.
Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the
legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations are vague or incomplete.
Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the
legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations are present but more could have been used to provide
better application to the issue.
Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the
legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations are present to support the issue.
Clear Override
Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example.

4. Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example are missing or inaccurate.
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example are vague or incomplete.
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example are present but more could have been
used to provide better discussion to the issue.
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example are present to support the issue.
Clear Override
Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Written Components
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Introduction is limited or missing entirely.
Poorly organized document.
Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

5. Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.
Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or
sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and
comprehension.
No attempt at APA formatting.
Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.
Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and
comprehension.
Transitions are sporadic.
Conclusion is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.
Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or
sentence structure that interferes with readability and
comprehension.
APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and
cite; but errors are significant.
Introduction has a clear opening, provides background
information, and states the topic.
Loosely organized document that may have to be inferred.

6. Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.
Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar
throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with
readability or comprehension.
APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and
cite; but a few errors present.
Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling
and appropriate background information, and clearly states the
topic.
Well organized document with an appropriate introduction.
Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate.
Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and
provides concluding insights.
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar
throughout that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in
following the writer’s logic.
APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for.
Clear Override

7. Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Rubric Total Score Total Total Score
Clear Override
Clear Override
Override
/ 325
/ 325
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
No Evidence0 points minimum
Clear Override
Unsatisfactory225 points minimum
Clear Override
Emerging255 points minimum
Clear Override
Proficient290 points minimum
Clear Override
Exemplary325 points minimum
Clear Override
Overall Feedback

8. Close
Bottom of Form
[{'c_rubricpreview
[{'3':['grid','page
PmgybnRcmUJvq
-3366302996388
Rubric Assessment
Top of Form
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–51)
51 points
51 %
Satisfactory (C Range) (52–59)
59 points
59 %
Proficient (B Range) (60–66)
66 points
66 %
Exemplary (A Range) (67–75)
75 points
75 %

9. Includes all assignment components and meets graduate level
critical thinking. A purpose statement is identified for the
response.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment.
Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose
statement is provided.
Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and
breath. Purpose statement is vague.
Assignment meets most of expectations with all components
being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is
present and appropriate for the assignment.
Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and
breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all
requirements of the assignment.
Clear Override
Override
/ 75
/ 75
*
Criterion score has been overridden
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–51)
51 points
51 %
Satisfactory (C Range) (52–59)

10. 59 points
59 %
Proficient (B Range) (60–66)
66 points
66 %
Exemplary (A Range) (67–75)
75 points
75 %
Integrates and understands assignments concepts and topics.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment.
Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts.
Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key
assignment concepts.
Clear Override
Override
/ 75
/ 75
*
Criterion score has been overridden
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–51)
51 points

11. 51 %
Satisfactory (C Range) (52–59)
59 points
59 %
Proficient (B Range) (60–66)
66 points
66 %
Exemplary (A Range) (67–75)
75 points
75 %
Synthesizes, analyses, and evaluates resources to apply concepts
in the assignment.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment.
Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts and
strategies.
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major
points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification
to support major topics. Uses one credible resource in the
assignment.
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates,
confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major
points presented. Uses a minimum of two credible resources in
the assignment.
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates,
confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major
points presented. Uses three credible resources for the
assignment, including at least one scholarly peer-reviewed
resource.
Clear Override
Override

12. / 75
/ 75
*
Criterion score has been overridden
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–17)
17 points
17 %
Satisfactory (C Range) (18–19)
19 points
19 %
Proficient (B Range) (20–22)
22 points
22 %
Exemplary (A Range) (23–25)
25 points
25 %
Uses correct spelling, grammar, and professional vocabulary.
Provides credible resources using correct APA format.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment.
Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA
errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Contains a few (3–4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA
errors.
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors.

13. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Clear Override
Override
/ 25
/ 25
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Rubric Total Score Total Total Score
Clear Override
Clear Override
Override
/ 250
/ 250
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
No Submission0 points minimum
Clear Override
Emerging (F through D Range)1 point minimum
Clear Override
Satisfactory (C Range)175 points minimum
Clear Override
Proficient (B Range)200 points minimum
Clear Override
Exemplary (A Range)225 points minimum
Clear Override

14. Overall Feedback
Close
Bottom of Form
[{'c_rubricpreview
[{'3':['grid','page
C2MaJkaaeiLHUW
-9195283816361