SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
Download to read offline
WHEN THINGS GO
WRONG IN READING
Roelien Herholdt & Prof. Elbie Henning
2015
CONTENTS
v  Types of languages
v  Fluent readers
v  Caution
v  Dyslexia: definition, causes, and consequences
v  Helping rules
v  Helpful strategies to improve reading
v  Surprising strategies
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This presentation draws widely on the works of:
v  Prof Stanislas Dehaene – Reading in the brain
v  Dr Jenny Thomson – University of London
v  Dr Duncan Milne –Teaching the brain to read
v  All other sources can be found under references
TYPES OF LANGUAGES
v  Logographic languages
v  Transparent languages
o  Letter-sound (grapheme-phoneme) connections are regular
o  Phonological awareness – predictor of reading achievement
o  Phoneme most important component
v  Less transparent languages
o  Lots of irregularities or exceptions
o  Onset and rime patterns become more important
PHONOLOGICAL DECODING
ROUTE
v  Depends on phoneme-grapheme correspondence
v  Generative – “self-teaching effect”
v  Steps:
o  Segmentation
o  Transcoding – link grapheme to phoneme
o  Fusion or concatenation
v  Assess through pseudo-words, e.g. labbit
o  Lexicalisation, e.g. labbit is read as rabbit
o  Additions, omissions, inversions and substitution
DIRECT ACCESS OR LEXICAL ROUTE
v  After lots of repetition
o  Develops only after years of practice
o  Creates illusion of whole word reading though fast and efficient automatisation
of processes
v  Depends on establishment of a direct connection between visual and auditory systems
v  Leads to less mistakes and is faster
v  Used most often by fluent readers
o  Left hemispheric dominance for processing in reading occurs
o  Prosody still processed in right hemisphere
v  Assess using irregular words, e.g. said
o  Mistake = regularisation e.g. sa-it
FLUENT READERS
CAUTION
It is often very difficult to discriminate poor reading ability due to dyslexia
from poor reading ability due to other factors
v  Auditory or auditory perception deficits
v  Low intelligence
v  Poor teaching or poor motivation to learn
v  Complexity of language, i.e. non-transparent languages
v  Poor socio-economic background
DYSLEXIA
v  Disproportionate difficulty in learning to read
v  Occur in 5-15% or 5-15% of children (depending on source)
v  Neurologically based
o  Several genes contributes to the development of dyslexia
o  How can this be if reading is NOT innate?
v  Often hereditary
o  Siblings of child with dyslexia have a 50% chance to have
dyslexia too
o  Parents with dyslexia are more likely to have children with
dyslexia
CAUSES
v Most children with dyslexia have phonological difficulties
o  Processing of phonemes or speech sounds
o  And consequently linking phonemes to graphemes
o  But later also have reading comprehension difficulties
v Rare cases have dyslexia caused by left-right confusion and
spatial difficulties
o  Leads to extensive spatial reversals of letters, e.g. “m” and
“w”, “b” and “d”
o  Leads to mistakes in the ordering of letters in words, e.g.
“snail” is read as “nails”
o  Leads to inversion of word order at sentence level
CAUSES
v  Some children with dyslexia have difficulties with foundational
sensory perception
o  Auditory perceptual processing
o  Visual perceptual processing
v  Some children struggle to automatise the link between visual
information and speech – Rapid automatised naming tests
v  So what does neuroscience say:
o  Joint deficits in the visual and speech circuits
o  Specifically deficits in invariant visual recognition and
phonological processing
REDUCED BRAIN ACTIVATION
REDUCED BRAIN ACTIVATION
v  Under-activation in the phonological information in speech
o  Explains the high frequency of difficulties with processing
phonological information in children with dyslexia
v  The bigger the under-activation in the word form area (letterbox)
the more severe the reading impairment
o  Impairment in the invariant visual letter recognition
v  In contrast,
o  Broca’s area is often hyper-activated
o  So is right temporo-parietal areas
GRAY MATTER DENSITY
GRAY MATTER DENSITY
v  Greater gray matter density in the left middle temporal gyrus
predicted reduced reading speed
NEURONS OUT OF PLACE
NEURONS OUT OF PLACE
v  During pregnancy neurons travel from where they are formed near the
ventricles (inner spaces of the brain) to the cortex (outer layer of the
brain)
v  In brains of people with dyslexia ectopias (misplacement of neurons)
occur in the layers of the cortex in both areas processing speech and
the word form area (letterbox)
o  Leads to impairment of the connections of these neurons
o  A thin fibre bundle under left temporo-pariental area is impaired in
people with dyslexia
o  Leads to disconnection in information flow
QUESTION
So if dyslexia is in essence caused by the brain
developing abnormally during pregnancy, how
can any teacher or psychologist assist such a
child? Is it even possible?
CONSEQUENCES OF
DYSLEXIA
v  Leads to problems with reading, writing, spelling and LEARNING
v  Associated with difficulties in
o  Concentration
o  Short term memory
o  Organisation
v  May lead to
o  Task avoidance
o  Stigmatisation
o  Increased stress – 3 times higher risk for suicide, 6 times higher risk
for drop-out
o  Poor self esteem, lack of confidence and perseverance
HELPING RULES
v  Short intervention sessions (10 to 30 minutes) daily for several
weeks
v  Interventions interspaced by sleep is more effective
v  Make it fun, interesting and attention grabbing
v  Computer games are amazingly effective
v  Start at where the learner is and not where the learner should be
v  Reading improves reading
HELPFUL STRATEGIES
v  Explicit teaching of phonemic awareness
v  Explicit teaching of alphabetical principle
v  Simultaneous teaching of graphemes and phonemes
v  Segmentation, e.g.
o  Syllables - use tokens, or hand under chin
o  Onset & rime for English
o  Phonemes for transparent languages
v  Phonics programme must be structured and sequential, e.g.
o  teach regular frequently used phonemes first
o  simple digraphs (sh) before complex patterns (-tion)
HELPFUL STRATEGIES
v  Multisensory teaching
o  feel pronunciation,
o  use concrete letters or tokens
v  Metacognitive, e.g.
o  Reflexive pause
o  Self questioning
v  Learning strategies, e.g.
o  LCWC (look, cover, write, check) for irregular words
o  SOS (simultaneous oral spelling) for regular words
v  Reduce memory and attention load
HELPFUL STRATEGIES
v  Explicitly teach vocabulary, especially subject specific vocabulary
o  Word walls
o  Personal dictionaries
o  Clue cards/picture dictionary
SURPRISING TECHNIQUES
v  Early musical notation training impacts positively on later reading
scores
o  Children learn to map a symbol/note onto a sound
v  Cursive writing and explicit left-write tracing of letters
o  Coloured lines
o  Cat’s head, body and tail
REFERENCES
v  Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R. & Willows, D.M.M. (2001). Systemic phonics instruction helps
students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis.
Review of of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
v  Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M.M., Schuster, B.V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z. &
Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness intruction helps children learn to read:
Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36,
250-287.
v  Galaburda, A.M., Sherman, G.F., Rosen, G.D., Aboitiz, F. & Geschwind, N. (1985).
Developmental dyslexia: Four consecutive patients with cortical anomalies. Annals of
Neurology, 18(2), 222-233.
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
v  Leppanen, P.H., Richardson, U., Pihko, E., Eklund, K.M., Guttorm, T.K., Aro, M. &
Lyytinen, H. (2002). Brain responses to speech sound durations differ between infants with
and without familial risk for dyslexia. Developmental Neuro-psychology, 22(1), 407-422
v  McCloskey, M. & Rapp, B. (2000). A visually based developmental reading deficit. Journal of
Memory and Language, 43, 157-181.
v  McCrory, E.J., Mechelli, A., Frith, U. & Price, C.J. (2005). More than words: A common neural
basis for reading and naming deficits in developmental dyslexia? Brain, 128(2), 261-267.
v  Orton, S.T. (1925). “Word-blindness” in children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14,
581-615
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
v  Paulesu, E., Demonet, J.F., Fazio, F., Mcrory, E., Chanion, V., Brunswick, N.,
Cappa, S.F., Cossu, G., Habib, M., Frith, C.D. & Frith, U. (2001). Dyslexia:
Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291(5511), 2165-2167.
v  Paulesu, , E., Frith, U., Snowling, M., Gallagher, A., Morton, J., Frackowiak, R. & Frith,
C.D. (1996). Is developmental dyslexia a disconnection syndrome? Evidence from PET
scanning. Brain, 119, 143-157.
v  Seymour, P.H., Aro, M. & Erskine, J.M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in
European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174.
v  Shaywittz,S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia. New York: Random House.
REFERENCES
v  Shaywitz, S.E., Escobar, M.D., Fletcher, J.M. & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that
dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New
England Journal of Medicine, 326(3), 145-150.
v  Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., Pugh, K.R., Mencl, W.E., Fulbright, R.K.. Skudlarski,
P., Constable, R.T., Marchione, K.E., Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R. & Gore, J.C. (2002).
Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental
dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52(2), 101-110.
v  Silani, G., Frith, U., Demonet, J.F., Fazio, F., Perani, D. Price, C., Frith, C.D. & Paulesu,
E. (2005) Brain abnormalities underlying altered activation in dyslexia: A voxel
basedmorphometry study. Brain, 128 (10), 2453-2461.
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
v  Simos, P.G., Breier, J.L., Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., Castillo, E.M. & Papanicolaou,
A.C. (2002). Brain mechanisms for reading words and pseudo-words: An integrated
approach. Cerebral Cortex, 12(3), 297-305.
v  Tallal, P., & Gaab, N. (2006). Dynamic auditory processing, musical experience and
language development. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(7), 382-390.
v  Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A. & Spinelli, D. (2005).
Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain amd Language,
93(3), 369-373.

More Related Content

What's hot

The Reading Process (Viewing Reading as a Skill)
The Reading Process (Viewing Reading as a Skill)The Reading Process (Viewing Reading as a Skill)
The Reading Process (Viewing Reading as a Skill)Joy Marie Dinglasa Blasco
 
Receptive skills reading and listening
Receptive skills reading and listeningReceptive skills reading and listening
Receptive skills reading and listeningAisa Jadulco
 
principles for teaching writing
principles for teaching writingprinciples for teaching writing
principles for teaching writingNieyta Rahmat
 
Reading skills - purpose and types of reading
Reading skills - purpose and types of readingReading skills - purpose and types of reading
Reading skills - purpose and types of readingMohan Raj Raj
 
Assessment of Children with Special Needs
Assessment of Children with Special NeedsAssessment of Children with Special Needs
Assessment of Children with Special NeedsEstebanCasauay1
 
Grading and reporting
Grading and reportingGrading and reporting
Grading and reportingReynel Dan
 
Slides Oral language: The foundation of reading and reading intervention
Slides Oral language: The foundation of reading and reading interventionSlides Oral language: The foundation of reading and reading intervention
Slides Oral language: The foundation of reading and reading interventionRALLICampaign
 
Reading fluency powerpoint
Reading fluency powerpointReading fluency powerpoint
Reading fluency powerpointseljordan
 
Assessment of Students with Special Needs
Assessment of Students with Special NeedsAssessment of Students with Special Needs
Assessment of Students with Special Needsdani803
 
5 stages of reading process
5 stages of reading process5 stages of reading process
5 stages of reading processMai Montefalco
 
Fluency & Comprehension Professional Development Workshop
Fluency & Comprehension Professional Development Workshop Fluency & Comprehension Professional Development Workshop
Fluency & Comprehension Professional Development Workshop Liz Sims
 
Classification of Exceptionalities(Children with Special Needs)
Classification of Exceptionalities(Children with Special Needs)Classification of Exceptionalities(Children with Special Needs)
Classification of Exceptionalities(Children with Special Needs)maria martha manette madrid
 
Types of assessment(2)
Types of assessment(2)Types of assessment(2)
Types of assessment(2)montuyajudith
 

What's hot (20)

Teaching reading
Teaching readingTeaching reading
Teaching reading
 
Teaching writing
Teaching writingTeaching writing
Teaching writing
 
The Reading Process (Viewing Reading as a Skill)
The Reading Process (Viewing Reading as a Skill)The Reading Process (Viewing Reading as a Skill)
The Reading Process (Viewing Reading as a Skill)
 
Receptive skills reading and listening
Receptive skills reading and listeningReceptive skills reading and listening
Receptive skills reading and listening
 
principles for teaching writing
principles for teaching writingprinciples for teaching writing
principles for teaching writing
 
Reading assessment
Reading assessmentReading assessment
Reading assessment
 
Reading skills - purpose and types of reading
Reading skills - purpose and types of readingReading skills - purpose and types of reading
Reading skills - purpose and types of reading
 
Fluency
FluencyFluency
Fluency
 
Assessment of Children with Special Needs
Assessment of Children with Special NeedsAssessment of Children with Special Needs
Assessment of Children with Special Needs
 
Grading and reporting
Grading and reportingGrading and reporting
Grading and reporting
 
Slides Oral language: The foundation of reading and reading intervention
Slides Oral language: The foundation of reading and reading interventionSlides Oral language: The foundation of reading and reading intervention
Slides Oral language: The foundation of reading and reading intervention
 
Models of Reading
Models of ReadingModels of Reading
Models of Reading
 
Reading fluency powerpoint
Reading fluency powerpointReading fluency powerpoint
Reading fluency powerpoint
 
Teaching reading
Teaching readingTeaching reading
Teaching reading
 
Assessment of Students with Special Needs
Assessment of Students with Special NeedsAssessment of Students with Special Needs
Assessment of Students with Special Needs
 
Teaching reading
Teaching readingTeaching reading
Teaching reading
 
5 stages of reading process
5 stages of reading process5 stages of reading process
5 stages of reading process
 
Fluency & Comprehension Professional Development Workshop
Fluency & Comprehension Professional Development Workshop Fluency & Comprehension Professional Development Workshop
Fluency & Comprehension Professional Development Workshop
 
Classification of Exceptionalities(Children with Special Needs)
Classification of Exceptionalities(Children with Special Needs)Classification of Exceptionalities(Children with Special Needs)
Classification of Exceptionalities(Children with Special Needs)
 
Types of assessment(2)
Types of assessment(2)Types of assessment(2)
Types of assessment(2)
 

Viewers also liked

Who's on the spectrum
Who's on the spectrumWho's on the spectrum
Who's on the spectrumRachel Smith
 
Getting to know dyslexia
Getting to know dyslexiaGetting to know dyslexia
Getting to know dyslexiaRachel Smith
 
Conference Increase Your Effectiveness 2 Hours 20 05 12
Conference Increase Your Effectiveness  2 Hours 20 05 12Conference Increase Your Effectiveness  2 Hours 20 05 12
Conference Increase Your Effectiveness 2 Hours 20 05 12PatrickMGeorges
 
A Lecture On The Common Reading Problems
A Lecture On The Common Reading ProblemsA Lecture On The Common Reading Problems
A Lecture On The Common Reading Problemsrosalia2010
 
Teacher Evaluation & Remediation
Teacher Evaluation & RemediationTeacher Evaluation & Remediation
Teacher Evaluation & RemediationRichard Voltz
 
Rica prep presentationCSULB10.25.14
Rica prep presentationCSULB10.25.14Rica prep presentationCSULB10.25.14
Rica prep presentationCSULB10.25.14ebowers44
 
Cognitive factors that affects reading and writting
Cognitive factors that affects reading and writtingCognitive factors that affects reading and writting
Cognitive factors that affects reading and writtingRaviv Baxter
 
Factors Involved in Reading and Writing Difficulties Ch. 2
Factors Involved in Reading and Writing Difficulties Ch. 2Factors Involved in Reading and Writing Difficulties Ch. 2
Factors Involved in Reading and Writing Difficulties Ch. 2Miami-Dade County Public Schools
 

Viewers also liked (10)

Who's on the spectrum
Who's on the spectrumWho's on the spectrum
Who's on the spectrum
 
Getting to know dyslexia
Getting to know dyslexiaGetting to know dyslexia
Getting to know dyslexia
 
Conference Increase Your Effectiveness 2 Hours 20 05 12
Conference Increase Your Effectiveness  2 Hours 20 05 12Conference Increase Your Effectiveness  2 Hours 20 05 12
Conference Increase Your Effectiveness 2 Hours 20 05 12
 
A Lecture On The Common Reading Problems
A Lecture On The Common Reading ProblemsA Lecture On The Common Reading Problems
A Lecture On The Common Reading Problems
 
Sept. Parent 09
Sept. Parent 09Sept. Parent 09
Sept. Parent 09
 
Teacher Evaluation & Remediation
Teacher Evaluation & RemediationTeacher Evaluation & Remediation
Teacher Evaluation & Remediation
 
Rica prep presentationCSULB10.25.14
Rica prep presentationCSULB10.25.14Rica prep presentationCSULB10.25.14
Rica prep presentationCSULB10.25.14
 
Cognitive factors that affects reading and writting
Cognitive factors that affects reading and writtingCognitive factors that affects reading and writting
Cognitive factors that affects reading and writting
 
Factors Involved in Reading and Writing Difficulties Ch. 2
Factors Involved in Reading and Writing Difficulties Ch. 2Factors Involved in Reading and Writing Difficulties Ch. 2
Factors Involved in Reading and Writing Difficulties Ch. 2
 
Reading difficulties
Reading difficultiesReading difficulties
Reading difficulties
 

Similar to Reading difficulties

Specific learning disorder
Specific learning disorder  Specific learning disorder
Specific learning disorder Kriti Jain
 
May 12 2016 Reading League presentation
May 12 2016 Reading League presentationMay 12 2016 Reading League presentation
May 12 2016 Reading League presentationTheReadingLeague
 
Science of Learning — Why it matters to schools and families?
Science of Learning — Why it matters to schools and families?Science of Learning — Why it matters to schools and families?
Science of Learning — Why it matters to schools and families?CITE
 
SLI and reading: 1. decoding
SLI and reading: 1. decodingSLI and reading: 1. decoding
SLI and reading: 1. decodingRALLICampaign
 
Dysleaxia.susie g.2015
Dysleaxia.susie g.2015Dysleaxia.susie g.2015
Dysleaxia.susie g.2015lopezlinis
 
Special needs presentation
Special needs presentationSpecial needs presentation
Special needs presentationjourni
 
Meeting the needs of families part 1
Meeting the needs of families part 1Meeting the needs of families part 1
Meeting the needs of families part 1elaine santos
 
languagedevelopment-141105200949-conversion-gate01.pdf
languagedevelopment-141105200949-conversion-gate01.pdflanguagedevelopment-141105200949-conversion-gate01.pdf
languagedevelopment-141105200949-conversion-gate01.pdfSandugashTagoboyeva
 
Specific learning disorder
Specific learning disorderSpecific learning disorder
Specific learning disorderEnoch R G
 
Dare2 read parent information evening
Dare2 read parent information eveningDare2 read parent information evening
Dare2 read parent information eveningRobyn Monaghan
 
Language Development in Children
Language Development in ChildrenLanguage Development in Children
Language Development in ChildrenDean Williams
 

Similar to Reading difficulties (20)

Specific learning disorder
Specific learning disorder  Specific learning disorder
Specific learning disorder
 
May 12 2016 Reading League presentation
May 12 2016 Reading League presentationMay 12 2016 Reading League presentation
May 12 2016 Reading League presentation
 
Dyslexia
Dyslexia Dyslexia
Dyslexia
 
Science of Learning — Why it matters to schools and families?
Science of Learning — Why it matters to schools and families?Science of Learning — Why it matters to schools and families?
Science of Learning — Why it matters to schools and families?
 
Dyslexia and Dysgraphia
Dyslexia and DysgraphiaDyslexia and Dysgraphia
Dyslexia and Dysgraphia
 
How mind learn to read
How mind learn to readHow mind learn to read
How mind learn to read
 
SLI and reading: 1. decoding
SLI and reading: 1. decodingSLI and reading: 1. decoding
SLI and reading: 1. decoding
 
Dysleaxia.susie g.2015
Dysleaxia.susie g.2015Dysleaxia.susie g.2015
Dysleaxia.susie g.2015
 
Special needs presentation
Special needs presentationSpecial needs presentation
Special needs presentation
 
Meeting the needs of families part 1
Meeting the needs of families part 1Meeting the needs of families part 1
Meeting the needs of families part 1
 
Dyslexia
DyslexiaDyslexia
Dyslexia
 
languagedevelopment-141105200949-conversion-gate01.pdf
languagedevelopment-141105200949-conversion-gate01.pdflanguagedevelopment-141105200949-conversion-gate01.pdf
languagedevelopment-141105200949-conversion-gate01.pdf
 
LEARNING DISORDERS
LEARNING DISORDERSLEARNING DISORDERS
LEARNING DISORDERS
 
Specific learning disorder
Specific learning disorderSpecific learning disorder
Specific learning disorder
 
Skyline Language
Skyline LanguageSkyline Language
Skyline Language
 
Bwsp Literacy Difficulties
Bwsp Literacy DifficultiesBwsp Literacy Difficulties
Bwsp Literacy Difficulties
 
b
bb
b
 
Dare2 read parent information evening
Dare2 read parent information eveningDare2 read parent information evening
Dare2 read parent information evening
 
Dyslexia
DyslexiaDyslexia
Dyslexia
 
Language Development in Children
Language Development in ChildrenLanguage Development in Children
Language Development in Children
 

More from Roelien Herholdt

More from Roelien Herholdt (6)

MARKO-D test poster
MARKO-D test posterMARKO-D test poster
MARKO-D test poster
 
Auditory perception
Auditory perception Auditory perception
Auditory perception
 
SAJCE%20June%202014
SAJCE%20June%202014SAJCE%20June%202014
SAJCE%20June%202014
 
SAJCE 4(2)_electronic book
SAJCE 4(2)_electronic bookSAJCE 4(2)_electronic book
SAJCE 4(2)_electronic book
 
fleisch 2011
fleisch 2011fleisch 2011
fleisch 2011
 
LearningBrief 38 final
LearningBrief 38 finalLearningBrief 38 final
LearningBrief 38 final
 

Reading difficulties

  • 1. WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN READING Roelien Herholdt & Prof. Elbie Henning 2015
  • 2. CONTENTS v  Types of languages v  Fluent readers v  Caution v  Dyslexia: definition, causes, and consequences v  Helping rules v  Helpful strategies to improve reading v  Surprising strategies
  • 3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This presentation draws widely on the works of: v  Prof Stanislas Dehaene – Reading in the brain v  Dr Jenny Thomson – University of London v  Dr Duncan Milne –Teaching the brain to read v  All other sources can be found under references
  • 4. TYPES OF LANGUAGES v  Logographic languages v  Transparent languages o  Letter-sound (grapheme-phoneme) connections are regular o  Phonological awareness – predictor of reading achievement o  Phoneme most important component v  Less transparent languages o  Lots of irregularities or exceptions o  Onset and rime patterns become more important
  • 5. PHONOLOGICAL DECODING ROUTE v  Depends on phoneme-grapheme correspondence v  Generative – “self-teaching effect” v  Steps: o  Segmentation o  Transcoding – link grapheme to phoneme o  Fusion or concatenation v  Assess through pseudo-words, e.g. labbit o  Lexicalisation, e.g. labbit is read as rabbit o  Additions, omissions, inversions and substitution
  • 6. DIRECT ACCESS OR LEXICAL ROUTE v  After lots of repetition o  Develops only after years of practice o  Creates illusion of whole word reading though fast and efficient automatisation of processes v  Depends on establishment of a direct connection between visual and auditory systems v  Leads to less mistakes and is faster v  Used most often by fluent readers o  Left hemispheric dominance for processing in reading occurs o  Prosody still processed in right hemisphere v  Assess using irregular words, e.g. said o  Mistake = regularisation e.g. sa-it
  • 8. CAUTION It is often very difficult to discriminate poor reading ability due to dyslexia from poor reading ability due to other factors v  Auditory or auditory perception deficits v  Low intelligence v  Poor teaching or poor motivation to learn v  Complexity of language, i.e. non-transparent languages v  Poor socio-economic background
  • 9.
  • 10. DYSLEXIA v  Disproportionate difficulty in learning to read v  Occur in 5-15% or 5-15% of children (depending on source) v  Neurologically based o  Several genes contributes to the development of dyslexia o  How can this be if reading is NOT innate? v  Often hereditary o  Siblings of child with dyslexia have a 50% chance to have dyslexia too o  Parents with dyslexia are more likely to have children with dyslexia
  • 11. CAUSES v Most children with dyslexia have phonological difficulties o  Processing of phonemes or speech sounds o  And consequently linking phonemes to graphemes o  But later also have reading comprehension difficulties v Rare cases have dyslexia caused by left-right confusion and spatial difficulties o  Leads to extensive spatial reversals of letters, e.g. “m” and “w”, “b” and “d” o  Leads to mistakes in the ordering of letters in words, e.g. “snail” is read as “nails” o  Leads to inversion of word order at sentence level
  • 12. CAUSES v  Some children with dyslexia have difficulties with foundational sensory perception o  Auditory perceptual processing o  Visual perceptual processing v  Some children struggle to automatise the link between visual information and speech – Rapid automatised naming tests v  So what does neuroscience say: o  Joint deficits in the visual and speech circuits o  Specifically deficits in invariant visual recognition and phonological processing
  • 14. REDUCED BRAIN ACTIVATION v  Under-activation in the phonological information in speech o  Explains the high frequency of difficulties with processing phonological information in children with dyslexia v  The bigger the under-activation in the word form area (letterbox) the more severe the reading impairment o  Impairment in the invariant visual letter recognition v  In contrast, o  Broca’s area is often hyper-activated o  So is right temporo-parietal areas
  • 16. GRAY MATTER DENSITY v  Greater gray matter density in the left middle temporal gyrus predicted reduced reading speed
  • 17. NEURONS OUT OF PLACE
  • 18. NEURONS OUT OF PLACE v  During pregnancy neurons travel from where they are formed near the ventricles (inner spaces of the brain) to the cortex (outer layer of the brain) v  In brains of people with dyslexia ectopias (misplacement of neurons) occur in the layers of the cortex in both areas processing speech and the word form area (letterbox) o  Leads to impairment of the connections of these neurons o  A thin fibre bundle under left temporo-pariental area is impaired in people with dyslexia o  Leads to disconnection in information flow
  • 19. QUESTION So if dyslexia is in essence caused by the brain developing abnormally during pregnancy, how can any teacher or psychologist assist such a child? Is it even possible?
  • 20. CONSEQUENCES OF DYSLEXIA v  Leads to problems with reading, writing, spelling and LEARNING v  Associated with difficulties in o  Concentration o  Short term memory o  Organisation v  May lead to o  Task avoidance o  Stigmatisation o  Increased stress – 3 times higher risk for suicide, 6 times higher risk for drop-out o  Poor self esteem, lack of confidence and perseverance
  • 21. HELPING RULES v  Short intervention sessions (10 to 30 minutes) daily for several weeks v  Interventions interspaced by sleep is more effective v  Make it fun, interesting and attention grabbing v  Computer games are amazingly effective v  Start at where the learner is and not where the learner should be v  Reading improves reading
  • 22. HELPFUL STRATEGIES v  Explicit teaching of phonemic awareness v  Explicit teaching of alphabetical principle v  Simultaneous teaching of graphemes and phonemes v  Segmentation, e.g. o  Syllables - use tokens, or hand under chin o  Onset & rime for English o  Phonemes for transparent languages v  Phonics programme must be structured and sequential, e.g. o  teach regular frequently used phonemes first o  simple digraphs (sh) before complex patterns (-tion)
  • 23. HELPFUL STRATEGIES v  Multisensory teaching o  feel pronunciation, o  use concrete letters or tokens v  Metacognitive, e.g. o  Reflexive pause o  Self questioning v  Learning strategies, e.g. o  LCWC (look, cover, write, check) for irregular words o  SOS (simultaneous oral spelling) for regular words v  Reduce memory and attention load
  • 24. HELPFUL STRATEGIES v  Explicitly teach vocabulary, especially subject specific vocabulary o  Word walls o  Personal dictionaries o  Clue cards/picture dictionary
  • 25. SURPRISING TECHNIQUES v  Early musical notation training impacts positively on later reading scores o  Children learn to map a symbol/note onto a sound v  Cursive writing and explicit left-write tracing of letters o  Coloured lines o  Cat’s head, body and tail
  • 26. REFERENCES v  Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R. & Willows, D.M.M. (2001). Systemic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of of Educational Research, 71, 393-447. v  Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M.M., Schuster, B.V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z. & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness intruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287. v  Galaburda, A.M., Sherman, G.F., Rosen, G.D., Aboitiz, F. & Geschwind, N. (1985). Developmental dyslexia: Four consecutive patients with cortical anomalies. Annals of Neurology, 18(2), 222-233. REFERENCES
  • 27. REFERENCES v  Leppanen, P.H., Richardson, U., Pihko, E., Eklund, K.M., Guttorm, T.K., Aro, M. & Lyytinen, H. (2002). Brain responses to speech sound durations differ between infants with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Developmental Neuro-psychology, 22(1), 407-422 v  McCloskey, M. & Rapp, B. (2000). A visually based developmental reading deficit. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 157-181. v  McCrory, E.J., Mechelli, A., Frith, U. & Price, C.J. (2005). More than words: A common neural basis for reading and naming deficits in developmental dyslexia? Brain, 128(2), 261-267. v  Orton, S.T. (1925). “Word-blindness” in children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14, 581-615 REFERENCES
  • 28. REFERENCES v  Paulesu, E., Demonet, J.F., Fazio, F., Mcrory, E., Chanion, V., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S.F., Cossu, G., Habib, M., Frith, C.D. & Frith, U. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291(5511), 2165-2167. v  Paulesu, , E., Frith, U., Snowling, M., Gallagher, A., Morton, J., Frackowiak, R. & Frith, C.D. (1996). Is developmental dyslexia a disconnection syndrome? Evidence from PET scanning. Brain, 119, 143-157. v  Seymour, P.H., Aro, M. & Erskine, J.M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174. v  Shaywittz,S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia. New York: Random House. REFERENCES
  • 29. v  Shaywitz, S.E., Escobar, M.D., Fletcher, J.M. & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(3), 145-150. v  Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., Pugh, K.R., Mencl, W.E., Fulbright, R.K.. Skudlarski, P., Constable, R.T., Marchione, K.E., Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R. & Gore, J.C. (2002). Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52(2), 101-110. v  Silani, G., Frith, U., Demonet, J.F., Fazio, F., Perani, D. Price, C., Frith, C.D. & Paulesu, E. (2005) Brain abnormalities underlying altered activation in dyslexia: A voxel basedmorphometry study. Brain, 128 (10), 2453-2461. REFERENCES
  • 30. REFERENCES v  Simos, P.G., Breier, J.L., Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., Castillo, E.M. & Papanicolaou, A.C. (2002). Brain mechanisms for reading words and pseudo-words: An integrated approach. Cerebral Cortex, 12(3), 297-305. v  Tallal, P., & Gaab, N. (2006). Dynamic auditory processing, musical experience and language development. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(7), 382-390. v  Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A. & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain amd Language, 93(3), 369-373.