This document presents an approach to analyze wellbore failure using image processing of rock cuttings (cavings). Different types of cavings are identified: tabular/blocky, angular, and splintery. Cavings are analyzed to determine shape characteristics like roundness and sphericity. These characteristics can then be used to classify cavings and infer the dominant failure type, such as shear failure. The approach is demonstrated on samples from the Harvey 1 well in Western Australia, where image analysis of cavings identified angular shapes indicating shear failure.
Model Call Girl in Narela Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Cavings
1. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
An approach for wellbore failure analysis using rock
cavings and image processing
1Curtin University
Christopher Skea, Alireza Rezagholilou, Pouria Behnoud far, Raoof Gholami, Mohammad Sarmadivleh
2. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Aims
Providing an approach for wellbore stability based on the image processing of cavings
This approach uses the sphericity and roundness of cuttings as input data to classify
the caving types and subsequently determines the dominant failure type.
2Curtin University 8/04/2019
3. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Cavings
Tabular/Blocky Cavings
3Curtin University 8/04/2019
Cause: invasion of drilling fluids into the weak planes/fractures causing instability within the wellbore.
Weak-plane cavings have flat faces parallel to bedding planes and are often induced because of a low mud weight
selection and drilling a borehole with 15 to 20 degrees deviation from the direction of bedding
Naturally fractured (Blocky-left) and weak plane (Tabular-right) Cavings (Kristiansen, 2004).
4. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Cavings
Angular Cavings
4Curtin University 8/04/2019
Cause: shear failure of the wellbore.
different parameters such as high horizontal stresses, low strength of rocks, low mud weight, insufficient mud viscosity,
and improper trajectory and temperature differences can be problematic
Angular Caving (Bradford et al. 2000)
5. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Cavings
Splintery Cavings
5Curtin University 8/04/2019
Cause: Splintery cavings are produced in over-pressured zones, where tensile failures occur throughout the wellbore
circumference
when drilling has a high ROP through low permeable rocks. Under this circumstance, a high pore pressure condition is
induced, causing tensile failures. This situation is intensified in the presence of high tectonic stresses and wellbore
enlargements
Angular Caving (Bradford et al. 2000)
6. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
General characteristics of cavings and their treatments
Shape Description Cause Treatment
Angular
Triangular
/arrowhead shape
with a rough
surface structure
Formed in a near
vertical well with
little bedding or
perpendicular to
bedding plans. Low
mud weight unable
support wellbore
wall and breakout
occurs parallel to
minimum
horizontal stress.
Increase Mud weight if allowable. Increase flow
to ensure good hole cleaning. If close to fracture
pressure, it is recommended to maintain mud
weight while reducing fluid and providing proper
hole cleaning.
Tabular Flat parallel faces
A combination of
Wellbore within 15˚
- 20˚ of bedding
planes and low mud
weight result in
bedding failure on
the high side of the
wellbore.
Slow drilling advised with small adjustments in
mud weight. Minimise surge and swap pressures
Splintery
Flat, thin and
planar structures
Underbalanced
drilling in hard rock
or areas of high
tectonic stresses. Or
by drilling too fast
in shale with low
permeability
Stop drilling and increase mud weight, set casing
if it cannot be controlled to avoid influx and/or
stuck pipe.
Reduce ROP.
Blocky Cubic in structure
Invasion of drilling
fluid into pre-
existing fractures
destabilising rock
formation.
Slow drilling advised with small adjustments in
mud weight. Change mud type. Minimise surge
and swap pressures
6Curtin University
7. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Case Study: Harvey 1 in Perth Basin
7Curtin University
Stratigraphic layers within the Southern Perth Basin as intersected by the GSWA Harvey-1
well (DMP, 2013).
8. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Grain shapes for image processing
8Curtin University
plot describing the grain shape by roundness and sphericity (Swanson, R. G. (1981). Sample examination
manual.
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = 4 ×
𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴
)𝜋𝜋(𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 2
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠) = 4𝜋𝜋 ×
(𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴)
(𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃)2
Typical image analysis: detailing number
of particles and shape
9. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
New criterion to relate failure type to cavings
9Curtin University
Graphical demonstration of the suggested relationships between failures and caving types
Scattering and distribution of cavings according to this Figure
examined for each sample after its image processing. The
logarithmic regression curve of sphericity against roundness
was determined for all samples. This curve was shifted in up
and down directions in the vicinity of the top and bottom rows of
Figure 10 and to define approximate boundaries.
10. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Typical example
10Curtin University 8/04/2019
shear failure of the wellbore highlighted by a large number of angular cavings and evidenced by the image log showing breakouts. The moderate amounts of blocky cavings
are evidence of the complete failure of wellbore circumference shown on the bottom of acoustic log.
Distribution of cavings in the sample from depth 1130-1135 m
11. Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
Other results
11Curtin University 8/04/2019
Depth (m) Cavings (%)
From To
Blocky/
Tabular
Angular Splintery
1130 1135 29.75% 70.01% 0.24%
1240 1245 46.32% 53.21% 0.47%
1245 1250 9.90% 90.09% 0.00%
1275 1280 19.47% 80.40% 0.13%
1280 1285 29.10% 70.69% 0.21%
1285 1290 25.88% 73.54% 0.59%
Distribution of cavings in different depths
Depth (m)
Eqv
dep.
SH
(MPa)
Sh
(MPa)
Sv
(MPa)
Pp
(MPa)
Mw
S.G.
To
oct σm F State
1130-1135 1130 30.0 20.7 23.3 11.0 1.2 17.6 23.6 -8.1 Shear Failure
1240-1245 1240 30.5 23.2 26.0 12.1 1.2 15.7 22.1 -6.5 Shear Failure
1275-1280 1275 30.9 23.9 26.8 12.4 1.3 15.4 22.0 -6.2 Shear Failure
1280-1285 1280 31.0 24.0 26.9 12.5 1.3 15.4 22.0 -6.2 Shear Failure
1285-1290 1285 31.0 24.1 27.1 12.5 1.3 15.3 21.9 -6.1 Shear Failure
1320-1325 1320 32.3 24.9 27.9 12.9 1.3 16.3 23.1 -6.8 Shear Failure
Failure stress analysis for some intervals