Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Analysing Prioritisation & Communication - Day Two
Similar to Analysing Prioritisation & Communication - Day Two (20)
More from Reuben Ray
More from Reuben Ray (11)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Analysing Prioritisation & Communication - Day Two
- 2. Recap Whether you think you can, or you think you can’t, you are right. MEANINGS COGNITION GOOD EVIL GOALS & AMBITIONS MOTIVATION Belief Systems
- 4. Discipline for results Discipline Ambition Trust Collaboration Discipline is the bridge ambition accomplishment.
- 5. Discipline as a tool Discipline Ambition Trust Collaboration Discipline is the quality we add to results Discipline of quantity or metrics Discipline of time Discipline of direction
- 7. Ambition Scaleable Trust Collaborative Discipline Ambition Trust Collaboration Ambition must be scaleable Trust supports the scale Collaboration increases the reach
- 9. Trust Scaleable Quantify Collaborative Discipline Ambition Trust Collaboration Trust scales with reputation and builds confidence What can be quantified, can be improved Collaboration is a factor of trust
- 11. Collaboration Scaleable Trust Direction Discipline Ambition Trust Collaboration Scaleablity is a key factor while accounting collaboration Trust yields collaboration Collaboration in the right direction
- 12. Owning Responsibility Own your boundaries in peace & war. Own the process to scale innovation. Own the role and improve its scale. Discipline Ambition Trust Collaboration
- 13. Additional pointers Learn from past and ongoing results. Consider new frontiers (like technology as tools). Be diverse in your options. Be social to collaborate faster. Be aware of the limitations. Discipline Ambition Trust Collaboration
- 14. We think for a purpose within a point of view based on assumptions leading to implications and consequences. We use data, facts, and experiences to make inferences and judgments based on concepts and theories in attempting to answer a question. facing reality
- 15. Purpose of Thinking Goal, objective Points of View Frame of Reference Perspective Orientation Issue to resolve Filling the gap or solving the Problem Implications & Consequences Information Data, observations, facts, experiences Assumptions Presuppositions, or what’s being taken for granted Concepts Theories, laws, models, definitions, principles Interpretation & Inference Conclusions & solutions Elements of Thought
- 16. How to think without bias Game: Choose the one which is larger 54 | 34 Semantic Congruity Task
- 17. How to think without bias Game: Choose the one which is larger 69 | 75 Semantic Congruity Task
- 18. How to think without bias A K 2 7 Rule: If there is a vowel on one side, there is an even number on the other side. Game: Choose one card you wish to turn to check the validity of the rule. Wason Selection Task
- 19. INDUCTIVE DEDUCTIVE STRONG VS. WEAK INVALID VS. VALID DATA THEORY OBSERVATIONS HYPOTHESIS LOGIC TRUTH CONCLUSIONS
- 20. Inductive vs. Deductive Ravi is human. 90% of humans are right-handed. Ravi is right-handed. Ravi is human. Ravi represents 90% of human race. Ravi is a right-handed human.
- 21. Understanding ourselves Fast Thinking Slow Thinking A bat and a ball together cost INR 101. The bat costs INR 100 more than the ball; how much does the ball cost?
- 22. Understanding Numbers %ofdriversdonatingorgans 04 28 17 12 100 100 100100 100 86 98 Denmark Netherlands UnitedKingdom Germany Austria Belgium France Hungary Poland Portugal Sweden Source: Dan Ariely
- 23. Understanding Communication Opt-in Check the box if you want to participate in the organ donation program Opt-Out Check the box if you don’t want to participate in the organ donation program Source: Dan Ariely
- 25. Bias is any process at any stage of inference which tends to produce results or conclusions that differ systematically from the truth. ~David L Sackett UNCONSCIOUS BIAS CONSCIOUS BIAS
- 26. Anchoring Bias Confirmation Bias Sunk Cost Fallacy Dunning-Kruger Effect Backfire Effect Declinism Bias Barnum Effect Framing Effect Attribution Bias Placebo Effect Availability Heuristic Status Quo Bias Ostrich Effect Cognitive Biases
- 28. Image copyright: www.yourbias.in Image copyright: www.yourbias.in
- 33. Initial Inference Future Assumption You see a man with a black eye A Traffic Officer asks your car to stop During class, a student asks “is this going to be on the test?” You see a child crying next to her mother in a grocery store He has been hit or injured in the face People who have black eyes have been hit in the face He is going to fine me for breaking the law Anytime a Traffic Officer asks you to stop, he’s going to fine you breaking the law This student is not interested in learning the subject Students who ask questions like this are not interested in learning the subject The mother has hurt the child Whenever a child is crying next to her mother, she must have been hurt by her mother Situation
- 34. Influencing others Discipline Ambition Trust Collaboration Trust Collaboration High Influence