Self Evaluation Software

1. SELF-EVALUATION SOFTWARE
Presented
By
Dr. Rajashekhar Shirvalkar
SMRS B.Ed and M.Ed College
Gulbarga

2. IMPORTANCE OF SELF EVALUATION
As we teacher endure self assess, we
become active participate in our own
evaluation. Our involvement enables us
to honestly assess our strengths of
teaching and learning that we need to
improve.
For this purpose A/V aided software helps.
i.e. CAMT-Self Evaluation Software

3. OBJECTIVES
To Develop Computer Assisted Macro
Teaching (CAMT) Software for Self Evaluation
especially for Teaching Assessment.
To validate developed CAMT software in terms
of user-friendly and flexibility.
To find out the effectiveness of developed CAMT
software acceptance by student teachers, teacher
educators and educational experts acceptance.

4. HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY
1
• CAMT self evaluation software significantly effective in term of user
friendly and flexibility.
2
• There is no significance mean difference between arts and science
student teachers in terms of user friendly and flexibility of CAMT self
evaluation software.
3
• Student teachers, teacher educators and educational technology
experts positively responses towards CAMT self evaluation software.

5. Design of the Study
Stage-I Development of software
Stage-II
Internal validation of
soft ware
Stage-III External validation of software.

6. Student
teachers-40
Science=20
Arts=20
Respondents
Teacher
educators=5
Educational
experts=5
Computer
experts=5
Sampling

7. •DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE PRODUCT
(CAMT Self Evaluation Software)
CAMT
Principles
Theories
ContentSteps
Characteristics
The CAMT software is developed by using the platform of VB 6.0 with MS Access
background.

8. FLOWCHART DESIGN OF CAMT-SE s/w

9. SCREEN SHOTS

22. Categories
frequenci
es SA A N DA SDA χ2 los
Arts Student teachers
fo 33 115 1 1 0
398.9 S*
fe 6 36 66 36 6
Science Student
teachers
fo 54 26 0 0 0
592.5
S*
fe 3.2 19.2 35.2 19.2 3.2
Table-1: Analysis of significance of Arts and Science Student teachers response scores
towards CAMT self evaluation software in terms of user friendly, flexibility and
acceptance:at df=4 and los=0.05, S*=Significance
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
No.ofResponses
Categories
Arts and Science Student teachers responses towards CAMT Self
Evaluation software
Arts Student teachers fo
Arts Student teachers fe
Science Student teachers fo
Science Student teachers fe

23. Categories
fre SA A N DA SDA χ2 los
User friendly
fo 236 244 00 00 00
2937.69 S*
fe 19.2 115.2 211.2 115.2 19.2
Flexibility
fo 167 262 42 9 0
1577.47
S*
fe 19.2 115.2 211.2 115.2 19.2
Acceptability
fo 412 440 32 14 2
4715.01
S*
fe 36 216 396 216 36
Table-2: Analysis of significance of Student teachers, Teacher Educators and Educational
Technologists response scores towards user friendly, flexibility and acceptability of the
software:
df=4 and los=0.05, S*=Significance
0
100
200
300
400
500
fo fe fo fe fo fe
User friendly Flexibility Acceptability
Responses
Categories
Student teachers, Teacher Educator and Educational Technologists Resonse scores
towards userfreindly, flexibility and acceptability
SA
A
N
DA
SDA

24. Findings
Generic
s/w
Significant
Positive
Attitude
Acceptace
MAJOR FINDINGS

25. EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS
Create positive in PT
To proceed with his won assessment
Active participation
Inspire teacher educators to develop s/w
Introduced in Tr programmes to develop
tr efficiency in teaching

26. RECOMMENDATIONS
Use in Micro teaching Practice
Compare to group lg and
individual lg
Practical Lab
Pre-service and in-service trs

27. CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE STUDY

28. SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY
1
• Micro teaching self evaluation,
• speed testing,
• Communication,
• personality etc.
2
• use Multilanguage
3
• Conduct workshop to awareness of ICT

29. CONCLUSION
So it can be concluded
that CAMT software is
one of the effective way
to improve the quality
while teaching practice.

30. Thank you