Final Presentation on Iron Nanoparticles_Prajwal (1)
1. Preparation and
Characterization of Iron
Nanoparticles using
Green Technology and
their comparative study.
Made By -
Prajwal S Bahukhandi
BTB/10/159
A0504110044
Supervisor -
Dr. Kirti Rani Sharma
Amity Institute of
Biotechnology
Co-Supervisor -
Dr. Jagriti
Dr. Nidhi Chauhan
Amity Institute of
Nanotechnology
3. Overview of the Project
Comparative Study and Analysis
Characterization
Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Addition of Precursor (FeCl3)
Extraction of Reducing agent from the Sample
Drying and Crushing
Collection of Sample
4. Comparative Study and Analysis
Characterization
Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Regulate pH to 7.0 using 0.4 M NaOH
Add both Chemicals to 200 ml of double distilled water
Weigh 0.059 gm of Ammonium Iron (III) sulfate
Weigh 0.265 gm of Ammonium Iron (II) sulfate
5. Review of Literature
Application of Iron Nanoparticles:
• Huber Dr. D. L. et. al. described in their paper titled “Synthesis,
Properties, and Applications of Iron Nanoparticles”: Iron as a
nanoparticle has been somewhat neglected in favor of its own
oxides, as well as other metals such as cobalt, nickel, gold, and
platinum. Iron's reactivity is important in macroscopic applications
(particularly rusting), but is a dominant concern at the nanoscale.
Recent work has begun to take advantage of irons potential,
and work in this field appears to be blossoming. [Huber Dr., D. L.
et. al., (2005)]
• Takada Prof. J. et. al. described in their paper titled “Research
and application of iron oxide nanoparticles explored”: Iron oxide
NP of about 100 nm produced yellowish red, and larger particles
sizes led to red and eventually dark purple colors. This study
revealed the application of BIOX as an ecofriendly anode in Li-
ion batteries. [Takada Prof, J. et. al., (2014)] [Laurent, S. et. al.,
(2008)]
6. Synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles using Green Technology:
• Pattanayak et. al. described in their paper titled “Ecofriendly
synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles from various Plants and Spices
extract”: Biosynthesis from different parts (mostly leaf) of the plant
is found to be the most effective process of synthesis at a very
affordable cost. Appropriate precursors such as Ferric Chloride
can be used for the reduction of plant extracts. Scientists report
the synthesis of nanoparticles, reducing Ferric ions present in the
aqueous solution of Ferric chloride by the help of different plant
extracts. Through elaborate screening process involving about 45
plants, we selected 10 most suitable plants as the potential
candidates for the synthesis of iron nanoparticles. [Pattanayak,
M. et. al., (2013)] [Li, L. et. al., (2006)]
• Iravani, S. et. al. described in their paper titled “Green synthesis of
metal nanoparticles using plants”: This study reveals that in recent
years, the development of efficient green chemistry methods for
synthesis of metal nanoparticles has become a major focus of
researchers. Investigations in order to find out an eco-friendly
technique for production of well-characterized nanoparticles
have been carried out. One of the most considered methods is
production of metal nanoparticles using organisms. Among these
organisms plants seem to be the best candidates and they are
suitable for large-scale biosynthesis of nanoparticles.
Nanoparticles produced by plants are more stable and the rate
of synthesis is faster than in the case of microorganisms. [Iravani,
S., (2011)] [Raveendran, P. et. al., (2013)]
7. Biomedical Applications of Iron Nanoparticles:
• Gupta, A. K. et. al. described in their paper titled “Synthesis and
surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical
applications” : Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
(SPION) with appropriate surface chemistry have been widely
used experimentally for numerous in vivo applications such as
magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement, tissue
repair, immunoassay, detoxification of biological fluids,
hyperthermia, drug delivery and in cell separation, etc. All
these biomedical and bioengineering applications require
that these nanoparticles have high magnetization values and
size smaller than 100 nm with overall narrow particle size
distribution, so that the particles have uniform physical and
chemical properties. To this end, most work in this field has
been done in improving the biocompatibility of the materials,
but only a few scientific investigations and developments
have been carried out in improving the quality of magnetic
particles, their size distribution, their shape and surface in
addition to characterizing them to get a protocol for the
quality control of these particles. [Gupta, A., K. et. al., (2005)]
8. Characterization:
• Nurmi, J. E. et. al. described in their paper titled “Characterization
and Properties of Metallic Iron Nanoparticles: Spectroscopy,
Electrochemistry, and Kinetics” : Superparamagnetic iron oxide
nanoparticles (SPION) with appropriate surface chemistry
have been widely used experimentally for numerous in vivo.
All these biomedical and bioengineering applications require
that these nanoparticles have high magnetization values and
size smaller than 100 nm with overall narrow particle size
distribution, so that the particles have uniform physical and
chemical properties. [Nurmi, J., E. et. al., (2004)]
9. Introduction
• What are Nanoparticles? – Particles with sizes in the
range of 10 – 100 nm are called nanoparticles. [Khan, F.
A., et. al., (2012)]
• This range (10 – 100 nm) is known as the Nanoscale.
• Why do they interest us? – Nanoparticle research is
currently an area of intense scientific research due to a
wide variety of potential applications in biomedical,
optical and electronic fields.
• Iron nanoparticles have been found to be an effective
measure to treat several types of ground contamination
and are easily transportable through ground water for in
situ treatment. These factors combined makes this
method cheaper than most methods currently being
used. [Kulkarni, L. et. al., (2009)]
10. • Iron oxide nanoparticles can easily be reduced to
magnetite and maghemite which preferred in
biomedical in vivo applications because they are
biocompatible and potentially non – toxic to
humans.
• They also show magnetic and paramagnetic
properties which make them a potentially useful
drug delivery system.
• Recent advancements in the field of
nanotechnology have led to the development of
various techniques for the biosynthesis of metal
nanoparticles. [Murphy, C. J. et. al., (2002)]
• Green Technology - Designing chemical products
and processes in a way that reduces or eliminates
hazardous substances from the beginning to end of
a chemical product’s life cycle.
11. • The practice began in United States with the
passage of the Prevention Pollution Act of 1990.
• It involves using of bio-extracts as reducing or
oxidising agents, thus making new products less
toxic.
• In this experiment, two green sources have been
chosen after comparing results of elaborate
screening performed by Pattanayak, M. et. al. and
a chemical synthesis is performed which led to the
establishment of a comparative study of data.
12. Objectives
• Green synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles from the
following samples:
1. Carrom Seeds (Trachyspermum ammi)
2. Green Tea (Camellia sinensis)
• Characterization of Iron Nanoparticles produced
from different samples.
• Comparative study and analysis of Iron
Nanoparticles produced from different sources
using Green Technology and Chemical Synthesis
method.
13. Methodology
Methodologies to be used in the Project
• Sample collection
• Drying: Natural drying in sun and/or Hot air oven.
• Crushing: Using Pestle and Mortar.
• Separation and Purification of plant extract:
Filtration using Whatman No. 1 filter paper and
Centrifugation at 5000 rpm.
• Preparation of 0.001M FeCl3 which is used as a
Precursor
• Mixing of Reducing Agent and Precursor (1:1) under
constant stirring at 50 – 60°C: Using Magnetic Stirrer.
14. • Characterization:
1. UV – spectroscopy
2. pH analysis
3. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS): Size of Nanoparticle
• Comparative study and analysis of the result and
data obtained.
17. 0.265 gm
Ammonium Iron (II) sulfate
0.059 gm
Ammonium Iron (III) sulfate
pH regulation to 7.0 by dropwise
addition of 0.4 M NaOH
Stirring on magnetic stirrer for 30
minutes
pH analysis UV – Vis
spectrophotometry
DLS
18. Results
• The pH analysis of both the samples was done using pH strips.
This change in pH indicated that the reduction reaction has
occurred. Following table depicts the results obtained:
19. • UV – Vis spectroscopy was performed by checking for
absorbance at regular intervals; 200 nm, 300 nm, 400 nm, 500
nm, 600 nm, 700 nm and 800 nm, analyzed the samples. The
following results were obtained:
20. • The table below summarizes the DLS results
obtained which depict the Diameter, Width and
Intensity of the nanoparticles synthesized:
21.
22.
23.
24. Interpretation and Discussion
• All the three samples showed a positive pH change,
which confirms the occurrence of the reduction reaction
of Fe3+ ions, which have formed the Iron Nanoparticles
in the samples.
• The absorbance spectra of all three samples show a
common point where the peak was observed, i.e., 500
nm. Which is in relevance with the absorbance spectra
of metallic iron
• The chemically synthesized iron nanoparticles aid the
study of the nanoparticles formed in the plant extract
sample because the absorbance peak observed was at
the same wavelength, confirming the presence of iron
nanoparticles.
25. • DLS results have made clear that the particles
synthesized are in the nanoscale (1 – 100 nm
range); sizes being 65.6 nm from Carom Seeds
sample, 72.7 nm from Green Tea sample and 88.9
nm from Chemical Synthesis method.
• This proves that synthesis of iron nanoparticles from
green sources, like carom seeds and green tea
leaves is equally efficient as by the chemical
reduction method.
26. Conclusion and Learning
Outcomes
• The extracts of plants were capable of producing Iron
Nanoparticles efficiently and gave good results in pH analysis
and characterization techniques used (UV – Vis spectroscopy
and DLS).
• Under the UV-Visible wavelength Nanoparticles showed quiet
good surface plasmon resonance behavior. All three samples
showed a peak at the same wavelength, 500 nm.
• The Dynamic Light Spectroscopy results validate the fact that
the particles synthesized were in the nanoscale and thus,
nanoparticles.
• The resultant single sharp peak in the DLS graph states that
there is only one kind of particle present in out sample solution,
i.e., there is no other particle synthesized and there is no
contamination in the sample.
27. • The conclusion can be reached that Plant Extracts can be an
effective source for synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles and can
produce better nanoparticles to an extent.
• Green Sources prove to be a cheaper source of production of
iron nanoparticles as compared to the chemical process.
• Although, the time taken by the Green Technology method is
a little longer than the Chemical Reduction method, scaling
up the process and synthesizing iron nanoparticles in a larger
quantity by processing larger volumes of the plant extract can
increase its efficiency.
• From the two green sources that were used in the experiment,
Carom Seeds produced nanoparticles of smaller size than the
Green Tea Leaves.
• More stirring and sonication can be done to the samples to
reduce the size of the nanoparticles.
• Also, we can attach a functional group of our interest and
desired properties to the nanoparticle and develop better
applications for the nanoparticle.
28. References
• Gupta, A., K. and Gupta, M. (2005). Synthesis and
surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for
biomedical applications, Biomaterials, Volume 26,
Issue 18, pp 3995–4021.
• Huber Dr., D. L. (2005). Synthesis, Properties, and
Applications of Iron Nanoparticles., American
Chemical Society.
• Iravani, S. (2011). Green synthesis of metal
nanoparticles using plants, Royal Society of
Chemistry.
• Khan, F. A. (2012). Biotechnology Fundamentals,
CRC Press, 2012, pp 328.
29. • Kulkarni, L. (2009). Synthesis and Characterization of
Nanoparticles, Industrial and Systems Engineering, pp.
16 – 18.
• Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Elst,
L. V. and Muller, R. N. (2008). Magnetic Iron Oxide
Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization,
Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological
Applications, American Chemical Society, pp 2064–
2110.
• Li, L., Fan, M., Brown, R. C. and Leeuwen, L. V. (2006).
Synthesis, Properties, and Environmental Applications
of Nanoscale Iron Based Materials: A Review, Critical
Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology.
• Murphy, C. J., Sau, T. K. and Gole, A. M. (2005).
Anisotropic Metal Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Assembly,
and Optical Applications, American Chemical
Society, pp 13857–13870.
30. • Nurmi, J., T., Tratnyek, P., G., Sarathy, V., Baer, D., R.,
Amonette, J., E., Pecher, K. (2004). Characterization
and Properties of Metallic Iron Nanoparticles:
Spectroscopy, Electrochemistry, and Kinetics,
Environmental Science and Technology, 2004, pp
1221–1230
• Pattanayak, M. and Nayak, P. L. (2013). Ecofriendly
synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles from various Plants and
Spices extract, International Journal of Plant, Animal
and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 3, Issue 1.
• Raveendran, P., Fu, J., Wallen, S. L., Kenan and
Venable Laboratories (2003). Completely “Green”
Synthesis and Stabilization of Metal Nanoparticles,
American Chemical Society, pp 13940–13941.
• Takada Prof, J. (2014). Research and application of
iron oxide nanoparticles explored, Science Daily, Vol.
JUL(14), pp. 111 – 129.
