Argumentative Essay On Junk Science

Argumentative Essay On Junk Science
In court, before testifying, the speaker is asked to put their hand on a bible and swear to tell the truth and nothing but the truth. When a forensic
specialist is testifying in court, they often say the phrase "To a reasonable degree of scientific certainty"when presenting their analysis (Balko par.10).
This phrase sounds convincing and persuasive to both the judge and the jury, but does not have any accepted meaning in the world of science and it
does not give away the percent error of the analysis. If these experts were to provide the percent error of their analysis in their testimony without
saying this common phrase then maybe the judge and the jury will have a better understanding of the data that is being presented to them and may not
even make a conviction based off the information that of which was stated. The question that should be asked is how reliable is forensic science and are
any advances being made to prevent "junk science" from being used in the courtroom?
The opposition may argue that Forensic science is a good way to present evidence to the judge and the jury to convince them that the defendant is
guilty. Although this may be the case in some circumstances it is not in every case. Forensic science is perceived as a form of science that is
typically being applied to criminal investigations. Most forensic sciences, such as odontology which is the scientific study of the structure and diseases
of teeth, are viewed as "junk science" because "...it does not
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Argument On Forensics
I believe my argument was compelling, and should sway Board members toward investing in the development of a forensic lab. The biggest difference
between corporate investigation and law enforcement investigation is the individual leading the charge. Dedicated forensic specialists can recover
evidences across multiple platforms and work within the guidelines of forensic laws to unearth the truth. Public law should provide the blueprint to
which organization create company policy. During an investigation, forensic specialist must follow federal, state and city statue; while adhering to
company mandate. In closing, presenting facts in a professional manner carries as much weight as the fact–finding

Persuasive Essay On STEM Education
Everyone wants what is best for their children, right? If that is true, then schools need to start preparing their students for the challenges they will meet
in college and the skills to overcome them. This is best done through the presence of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) in middle
and high schools. Through Wisconsin schools furthering their focus on STEM with extracurriculars, students will gain vital skills that are necessary
for human progression, problem–solving and time management skills that can be used in real life, and the students learn how they can apply what is
being taught in the classroom to real obstacles and challenges. It is clear that STEM is a rapidly growing and advancing field that is needed for our
human progression. There are so many different professions that fall under STEM education and many of them impact the world every day. According
to former President Barack Obama "[Science] is more than a school subject, or the periodic table, or the properties of waves. It is an approach to the
world, a critical way to understand and explore and engage with the world, and then have the capacity to change that world" (Science, Technology,
Engineering and Math). Here, former President Obama is talking about how important science is as more than just a school subject; science can be
taken out of school and used to impact many people and change the world. Some may say that there have been other fields in history that became very
popular but

Ethics in Science Essay
What do you think of when you hear or see the word "science"; test tubes, Einstein, Space? Science is "generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact
sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact"
(Orwell). Scientists are those who study science by scientific method. These "men of science", which Orwell describes as "a biologist, and astronomer,
perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician", "work by means of induction and deduction, and that by the help of these operations, they, in a sort of
sense, wring from Nature certain other things, which are called natural laws, and causes, and that out of these, by some cunning skill of their own,
...show more content...
This undoubtedly demonstrations the pros and cons of inventions made through science. There are people who abuse medicine, and other creations
from science, for numerous different reasons. Things like guns and nuclear weapons were formed to protect, but with the downside of killing
others. With all of this this being said, should there be a limit to things we make? More importantly, does science have an ethical responsibility to
humanity? I think to answer that question, we need to start with deciding if scientists have an ethical responsibility to humanity. As the saying goes,
with knowledge comes power and with power comes responsibility. However, there can be no limitation on the knowledge obtained from science.
Instead, we must limit what arises from knowledge and power. What are some responsibilities of scientists and the rest of the population? Well, to
start on the broadest sense, science should only be used for the absolute necessary improvement of humanity. It is our ethical responsibility to not
take advantage of science to further the advancement of military power, as we have done with the creation of atomic and nuclear bombs. Is it
responsible to use science for fame, fortune and glory? No, and it is not acceptable, but it is common for people to do so. If, for some reason, we had
the option to save 80% of endangered wildlife through scientific means, but with the consequence of harming the atmosphere, would it be ethical to
continue on? We would have

Different Arguments and Theories on Global Warming and Why to Take Action
Every year, almost 7 billion tons of carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere by human activity. That is the equivalent of 107,700,000 jet
airplanes being in the air at once! This harrowing figure is the main cause of global warming, and has been increasing for the last 50 years. Global
warming is caused by the increase of greenhouse gasses, carbon dioxide and methane primarily, in the earth's upper atmosphere directly caused by
human burning of fossil fuels, industrial, farming, and deforestation activities. Global warming is defined as an increase in the average temperature of
the earth's atmosphere (especially a sustained increase that causes climatic...show more content...
The most likely suspect for [warming] is a natural climate change or cycle that we didn't expect or just don't understand." This quote describes a natural
cause to global warming, and refrains from relating to cause by carbon dioxide emissions from humans.
People have also begun to link global warming to the sun in the last decade. The views of David Bellamy, a conservationist, and Dr Sami Solanki, the
director of Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, include that the majority of people are seeing global warming in the wrong light and that
the brightness of the sun is directly related to the warming of the Earth in the last century (Leidig and Nikkhah 1). The sun is a popular resource for
natural cause of global warming, but there are scarce amounts of evidence on this information. Sallie Baliunas, an astrophysicist, believes that the sun
is the main culprit of global warming, and that its varying activity is the cause for the global warming. As a strong scientist of her field, Baliunas
supports her opinion with many statistics that prove that the sun does cause changes in the earth's climate. However, by stating that the sun is the only
reason for global warming, she is quite a biased individual. The evidence presented by these scholars is very influential in the scientific community,
contradicting the mainstream idea that humans are to blame; this is negative upon the goal of the

Argumentative Essay On Evolution
Evolution It has always been a mystery of how life on Earth started. Although we may not be able to find out exactly how life originated, we can find
out how life has changed over time through the theory of evolution. Evolution is the process by which all living organisms come through a long
history of changes shaped by physical and chemical processes still taking place. There are debates between whether the theory of evolution is truly
scientific. The argument stems from why evolution is considered a "theory." To many, a theory is simply defined as someone's opinion. Inbiology, a
theory is "an explanation of some natural phenomenon with well supported evidence from experiments or observations" (Reed Wicander, 2012).
Discovery of Evolution
Between 1831 and 1836, Charles Darwin embarked on a five–year voyage after graduating from Cambridge University with a degree in theology.
Darwin made a visit to the Galapagos Islands, where he made observations which changed his ideas on present–day species. The idea the people of that
time before his discovery held on to the concept of the fixity of species, where all species were created in their current forms with little to no changes
at all. After observing fossils of past mammals and the 13 species of finches living on the island, Darwin realized that these animals came from a
common ancestor. After making such observations, he was convinced that "all living organisms derived from ancestors that lived in the past with some

Live Science Argumentative Essay
For children interested in computers and other tech this invention just might be what you want.To jumpstart their future tech–y careers, many apps,
toys and games are available to teach coding and computer science skills to kids. The variety can be dizzying. Live Science spoke with some
educators, who seem to agree that open–ended play and the ability to "scale up" in complexity as a child grows older are useful rules of thumb when
deciding which ones to purchase.
"The easy advice is to look for something easy," Mike Matthews, director of program innovation at Katherine Delmar Burke School, a private, all–girls
school in the San Francisco Bay area that offers coding opportunities within classes for its K–8 students, told Live Science. "Use

Research Paper On Science And Religion
Science and Religion
When you think of science and religion you automatically think that they are the polar opposite of one another, and while yes they do tend to have
conflicting sides to them, they actually have some things in common. This goes without saying that they do have varying ideas on certain topics which
will be discussed. Of the plethora of different topics, we will be discussing the views of science and religion on, homosexuals, evolution, afterlife, and
purpose. Not only will we be talking about those topics, we will also discuss the variety of conflicting views of different religions. Many of these
topics are controversial and many religions will have different views, some may be violent, some peaceful, whilst others may be indifferent.
Regardless of the position that everyone takes we all just want to understand or feel like we understand the universe and why we are here. We will
start off with science, science in many cases is stoic and homosexuality is not an exception, but regardless of the stoicism, the fact is you see it in
nature, in a book published by Simon LeVay, a neuroscientist from the University of Harvard, Gottingen, and Cambridge, he states "about 10% of
rams (male) refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other rams" (LeVay, 2010, pg 70–71). The next topic for examination is
Evolution, or as some creationists may say the "theory of evolution", and yes it is a theory, but in science when something is a theory it is the

Argumentative Essay: Is Psychology A Science?
There has been an ongoing debate on whether psychology is indeed scientific, although recent, psychology is now considered a science. This is because
it uses scientific methodology in researching, devising treatments and measuring the outcomes. These methods include collecting and analysing data
and concluding their findings in order to identify whether the research or treatment adequality solves the problem. Scientific studies must be replicable,
this means the if repeated exactly the same, the results should produce an identical outcome. Replicability can be increased by ruling out any
alternatives that may not have originally been thought of. Objectivity in science is the idea that scientist, in an attempt to get the best results, must first

Argumentative Essay On Climate Change
Climate change can be traced down to since the mid–1800s, when the industrial revolution first started taking place all around the world. Lives of
human and animal species have been negatively affected since then, with events such as natural disasters, the melting of ice in polar regions, and
change in weather and living conditions. Climate change in polar regions, in particular, has faced the most damage compared to any other region
because of its location in regard to the sun. Climate change holds many different views and opinions about the effects, and even the existence itself, but
evidence is clear and unmistakable in global ramifications and local impact in polar regions.
"...Climate change [is] the 'greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people'", skeptics like Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma like to say. Climate
change is change in climate patterns due to an increase in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases produced by certain human activity. According to
the National Snow and Ice Data Center, data taken by satellite has shown that the Arctic cover has decreased by 30% over the past 30 years, and this
change, which also include change in sea ice and permafrost, in artic weather and climate is caused by humans. Although numerous scientists have
confirmed the legitimacy of climate change, there are different views on whether climate change is real or not. Government officials like Senator Jim
Inhofe of Oklahoma or Senator Marco Rubio of Florida have explicitly stated that they do not believe climate change is neither real, nor caused by
humans (Tom McCarthy, 2014). On the other hand, mainstream media and other media outlets, such as The Independent and The Economist, have
reported their findings of climate change and its legitimacy. The Independent (Conner, S. 2011) reported that records of these changes were taken by
military submarines, land measurements, and satellite data to prove ice in polar regions are melting faster and faster. Satellites have tracked sea ice
since the 1970s and by nuclear submarines since the Cold War,
according to Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University and it was predicted that by September 2015, there would be no more sea ice. (Conner, S.
2011). Luckily, sea ice has not

Argumentative Essay On Renewable Energy
Renewability
For nearly everyone on earth, fossil fuels are a part of our daily lives. Some of the more obvious places to find petroleum products would be gas and
diesel in cars and trucks, but it is in more than just your tank. Without fossil fuels, we would not have things such as plastic to make a wide variety of
things such as tires, kayaks, or even computers. The question remains, do we need fossil fuels?
In this day and age, we have new energy sources that could be used to power our homes and transportation. Wind and solar power are used all over
the world, but are still used far less than fossil fuels. Most would say it's not reliable or it doesn't make any profit. While both statements are true, it
doesn't mean we can't make a better future using renewable energy. In fact, the only reason we don't use renewables for everything is that we don't want
to change. The hard truth is we need to change. Fossil fuels are great right now, but if we run out, humanity must have another source of energy.
Renewable energy may seem like a daunting task, but the benefits to humanity could be incredible. Public uses of renewable energy range from
transportation all the way to heating and cooling. Everything we use could become less explosive and less expensive. Cities with a high concentration
of people could become safer and healthier places to live. Transportation could be converted to electricity dramatically, improving smog conditions.
Global warming may or may not

Plants being constructed by today's standards are 1,600 times safer than early nuclear plants, in terms of the predicted frequency of a large radiation
leak"("Risk of Meltdown"). Would you feel safe living one mile from something than was constructed 1,600 times safer than previous construction?
If you would, then you are going to support our debate, research, and presentation is for nuclear energy. Throughout this project we have been
collecting data, some supported nuclear energy others didn't. Recently we did a Geiger counter lab there, it's shown how much radiation we are
exposed to. The dangerous amount of radiation is 5 rems luckily the school only had .0001 to .001 rems per hour. An upside is we do not rely on fossil
fuels, and we do

Put A Little Science In Your Life Analysis
Science is essential. The thought of life without scientific knowledge is virtually a nightmare. In Brian Greene's article titled "Put a Little Science in
Your Life" he stresses the importance of science education. As an aspiring anesthesiologist in pediatrics, I cannot help but agree. Science, whether it
be physical, life, or earth, is the backbone of the world we live in today; without it, we can say goodbye to our highways, buildings, means of
transportation, and many of our prized possessions but most importantly an understanding of the world we live in. Unfortunately, a lot of people do not
realize this. Today,science plays a great role in many aspects of our daily lives; from the minute you wake up to the time you snooze. It serves...show
more content...
Everyone benefits from science education; it is one of the key elements in our cycle of life. We depend on pharmaceutical companies to provide us
with medication to keep us from being sick. The pharmaceutical industry depends on the work of scientists for new research on what medicines are
safe and effective for the people. These scientists are the ones who are accountable for testing and producing new pharmaceutical drugsдёЂpills,
creams, and everything else that we need to live healthier, longer lives. Think of the last time you ate today, you think science didn't play a part of
that? Think again. From taking a course in nutrition this semester, I now understand that science plays a big role in prolonging a food's shelf–life. It is
the knowledge we obtain from science that pushes new ways of a sustainable agriculture. We depend on our doctors when we need any kind of major
organ transplant; and thanks to their studies from the medical field they are able to perform such task. If it weren't for science, we'd probably still be
stuck in the Stone

Argumentative Essay On Space Exploration
Space Exploration
One could believe that by renowned astrophysicist Carl Sagan, who claimed that "if we ruin the earth, there is no place else to go," mankind must
either obtain a conscious rationale for human behavior towards the earth––which seen throughout history, has never been the case––or focus on the
topic of space exploration; that is, of course, if humans desire to lengthen mankind's lifetime. The exploration of space is home to, really, two distinct
viewpoints: exploration of the briefly known is vital to humanity's survival, or space exploration is more or less a waste of time and a burden to
taxpayers and/or the governments involved. Thus space exploration can be seen controversial topic––because there more is more than one side to take
on the matter.One reason as to why space exploration is necessary to be funded by the federal government is because humanity is doomed without
such support. In the article 'Why We Must Leave Earth,' intellectual Richard Gott supplies viewpoints from acclaimed scientists, astronauts, CEOs,
about the need for humanity in places other than Earth. One specific instance in which he takes the side alluded to in the title is as follows: "We
might have conquered the planet but it is just a tiny island in the universe, and species confined to a single island are often found on the endangered
list." This quotation directly supports the claim of humanity's status if it is discontinued of federal and/or private funding. A specific piece of it
provides humanity's place in space: on a single island in the ever–expanding, vast cosmos. This shines light on the intellectuals who are aware of what
has happened to previous species confined to the same limits of mankind today. It also inadvertently supports the claim that humans can and must
expand outward. This next piece of evidence is featured as Gott explains how crucial human exploration of space is to the survival of humanity.
Conversely, after providing this piece of evidence, Richard Gott goes into detail about now–extinct Earth species. It is as follows: "The fact is that we
are vulnerable to the same types of catastrophic events that have wiped out other species on Earth." This statement is very similar to the previous

Argumentative Essay On Genetic Engineering
Imagine if we could make disease a thing of the past and extend the average human lifespan past 100 years. With genetic engineering, someday this
future could become reality. Genetic engineering can cure genetic diseases, and extend and empower human life. However, many people have
overestimated and reacted to ethical and safety concerns associated with this new technology.
Genetic engineering is the modification of an organism's genetic material. This has been done worldwide in genetically modified crops, and to a limited
extent in animals. In human genetic engineering, the modification is done in the embryo, altering the traits the child is born with and will pass on.
Laws have been passed in many countries making this illegal. In the U.S., this is a highly debated and controversial subject, but human genetic
engineering is legal.
The human body is not perfect. Mutations in genes cause genetic diseases, which can be crippling to live with, difficult to diagnose, and even harder
to cure. Babies in particular are vulnerable. According to the Popular Science article, "Infant Possibilities", by Melinda Moyer, genetic diseases are
the leading cause of death in infants. Moyer said that many of these diseases are caused by only a single gene mutation. They are relatively simple
genetically but there are thousands of extremely rare illnesses around the world. Now, new genetic technology is available from a few companies that
can help parents have a healthy baby, if either parent

Persuasive Essay About Stem Education
I will be writing a 5 paragraph essay about S.T.E.M, to start my essay off i will like to let you know what stem stands for and the benefits of stem
education. Stem is an acronym that stands for science, technology ,engineering and mathematics , but stem also refers to many different things then
just the subjects themselves. Learning about stem can really benefit you, it can help you learn things you didn't know and also help you solve some of
your concerns. Stem can help you make a difference it can also help you stay current and get you a job in the beauty industry. Having a stem education
can really brighten your future in many different ways, now I will like to go a little farther and tell you just a bit more about stem and its benefits.
Stem has a lot of benefits inside of the little 4 letter word it can get you very far in life and brighten your present and your whole entire future.Stem
can get you fast income and have you living up to part i'm not just saying this I mean it. In order to get a stem education you will have to take a
science,math,engineering or sum sort of technology course. With these options you can find things or classes that you really like and take it to the
next level like agricultural science,food science, biology,or even animal science.These are the types of education and the things you will need to do
and know in order to receive a stem education.
Stem education can connect to many different things in your life it can

Argument Between Science and Religion Essay
Why would educated, reasonable people believe in one side of an argument when the majority of the evidence points to the other? The argument
between science and religion began with Charles Darwin publishing Origin of the Species, and since then, is still a conflict, because every individual
questions: Where do people come from? Where does the earth come from? The universe? Not only Charles Darwin, but many scientist who followed
Charles Darwin as a paragon of evolution, found evidence and answers to argue that evolution is the more reasonable theory in the question of: Where
did everything come from? This paper focuses on a traditional Creationist theory as described in the Genesis story of creation in the Hebrew Bible.
Evolution is the...show more content...
But then the next question is: Where did god come from? If that gets considered as an unanswerable question, then save a step and say the origins of
the universe are an unanswered question. Creationist also argue, that god always existed, why not save a step again and consider that the universe
always existed, but then there wouldn't be a need for a creation, it was always there. These are not easy questions. In an evolutionist eyes though, the
universe did not always existed, but was the consequence of an unusual event. The Big Bang.
How could life begin without intelligent interference?
It is possible that through a chemical process life can begin without intelligent interference.
To answer this question requires looking at the primordial earth as it was over 1.7 billion years ago: warm, mostly wet, and with an atmosphere of
different gases like hydrogen, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide. DNA is a chain of just four different types of nuclear tights. Under the condition of
the primordial earth those nuclear tights can form on they own. After they formed the next step is to join together. Researches found that the clay
in the primordial earth was in perfect condition for them to join and so they did. The result was RNA. RNA is able to make copies of itself. The
copies are not always perfect there are mistakes. The ones that are copied better are stronger and survive. And so over 1.000 years RNA grew more
complex to DNA. DNA needs

Argumentative Essay On Faith And Science
"That's because new evidence comes into the light all the time, Miss. Singer." Mr. McLaren said in a tizzy. "Maybe," I said, giving him attitude right
back. "But you made it sound like God and science can't coincide, and I have faith they can. Like take sciences theory of the Big–bang, which may
actually be the same thing as the Bible's theory of God saying, 'Let there be light.' And, in bringing both theories together. God creating the Heavens
and the Earth may be the same as all matter being created simply out of nothing." "Miss. Singer, I have no doubt that you have a deep faith in your
superstitions. But in the scientific community. We rely on cold, hard facts not faith." Mr. McLaren then said to me in a series of little head shakes.
Like belittling me was somehow going to shut me up, and not just piss me off. "What's wrong with having faith to help explain the things that you
don't yet have the evidence to explain or all the answers to?" I asked now really wanting to provoke a controversy. "Because faith is hokum, Miss.
Singer,"...show more content...
"Faith is like the squirrels in my front yard." "What, Miss. Singer?" "Yeah, I have these squirrels livin' in the trees in my front yard, and all day long I
see them foraging for food. Every time you look at them, they're either eatin' somethin' or lookin' for somethin' to eat. It's non–stop, all day. Now, for as
much time as I've spent watchin' them eating. I have never ever seen a single one take a crap, but I have faith they do. Now, are you gonna tell me
that my faith is wrong, that they don't poop?" The whole class just stared at me. "Miss. Singer, I don't have time for this." Mr. McLaren then said
before moving on with his lecture and not bothering to call on me for the rest of the class.
пЂ пЃµпЃµпЃµпЃµ
Fifth period eventually rolled around, and I found myself back in the cafeteria–the leper sitting by herself–hunkered down at my table in the far corner
of the

Argumentative Essay On Junk Science

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Argumentative Essay On Junk Science

Similar to Argumentative Essay On Junk Science (8)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Argumentative Essay On Junk Science