- The document argues strongly against involvement of Iraq's neighbors Kuwait, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Iran in Iraq's affairs. It claims they are unstable, oppress minorities, promote terrorism, and will contaminate Iraq. The only neighbor it supports having a role is Turkey, which it calls the US's strongest NATO ally. It recommends keeping the other neighbors out of Iraq through closed borders, and in the case of Saudi Arabia and Iran, promoting their dissolution into independent states.

1. Who does not want Turkey in Iraq?
A vicious force of confusion in the US decision-making process and a sheer
deterioration in the world’s status quo seem to gain momentum. Only sheer
paranoia could make people suggest that the US negotiates an exit from Iraq
with the murderous tyrants of Syria and Iran, instead of bringing-in the US
strongest NATO ally, Turkey!
Simple comparison of advantages and disadvantages would be enough for
military headquarters, geopolitical specialists, political analysts, diplomatic
experts, journalists and average public to understand.
Iraq’s neighbors are the following:
Kuwait
Kuwait – this is an insignificant, semi-barbaric, analphabetic sheikhdom
where only recently a woman was allowed to be sworn-in as minister (20 June
2005). World mass media and confusion-spreading, dangerous TV channels
(like the villainous, inhuman and criminal epicenter of global disinformation
named BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4085486.stm)
failed to remind their naïve audience that the minister in question wears
hedjab (Islamic veil), so she could eventually be one of the many wives of
Ossama bin Laden or any other terrorist. She could even be a female terrorist!
Her nomination was not a success for Democracy in the Middle East; it was a
disaster for Humanism.
This would be enough for Kuwait, a miniscule country that came to existence
only because of the British colonial plans against the Ottoman Empire. The
country that was invaded by Saddam Hussein has no credentials to
participate in any possible positive development in Iraq.
Jordan
Jordan – an otherwise minor country, with the local population having long
become a minority among the Palestinian immigrants. This perhaps does not
say much to the American public opinion, because in America the conditions
prevail for a fruitful and constructive assimilation of numerous immigrants.
But take a break and think:
- how New Zeeland would be after a massive immigration of let’s say 10
million Indonesians? How present day New Zealanders would find
themselves, if turned into a minority within their own country? In this regard,
it should be taken into consideration that the Palestinian immigrants currently
represent almost 70% of Jordan’s entire population!

2. - what would be left of Denmark, if 12 million Poles immigrated and settled in
this Scandinavian country? Probably nothing!
So, this is the so-called country of Jordan: a fake country created out of
international developments (post WW I 'treaties') that were undesired and
reviled by the local, long tyrannized people. That land's indigenous
population has continuously and totally rejected the said developments but
did not have access to the world’s media to express their feelings and let the
world know how much they dislike, how much they suffer from, how much
they do not want to live with, and how much they want to get rid of the
‘imported’ populations.
As a non-country, Jordan survived only because its funny bogus-kings
(whose tribal ancestors were alien to the local populations and originated
from Hejaz where they had been pitilessly murdered at the hands of the
barbaric forebears of the Saudi family) were necessary to the British colonial
manipulation plans that involved defeat from Israel, followed by passive
acceptance of the Jewish state, opposition to Syria and Iraq, and facilitation of
plots of all sorts. Americans stepped in last, but did not change the rules.
It is quite indicative that the current charlatan 'king' of Jordan felt obliged to
get married with a Palestinian street girl, the so-called 'queen' Rania, who
could otherwise have exploded herself in the streets of Tel Aviv. Her
Palestinian origin gives some legitimacy to this little chieftain of Abdallah,
who knows very well that, if we take into consideration the Palestinian origin
population proportion among the Jordanian citizens, he is actually not a king
but a prince consort, nothing more than a royal consort of his lewd wife's! So,
Jordan is not an entity that has any qualifications to have a say whenever it
comes to Iraq.
Yet, few understand in the West that, if we take the Iraqi Sunni discourses
into consideration, we should admit that the Iraqis are happier than the real
Jordanians, because the Iraqis at least 'revolt' against the 'foreign invaders'
(the Americans and their allies) but the Jordanians have no chance to rebel
against the occupying forces of their own country, namely the Palestinians.
This dire reality of the oppressed indigenous people of Jordan is totally
unknown to the international public opinion due to the orchestrated mass
media misinformation and disinformation processes. The very simple truth is
that Jordan turned out to be the cemetery of its own people.
SaudiArabia
Saudi Arabia – this is the darkest, sickest, filthiest realm in the world, the
most unethical, the most murderous, the most inhuman tyranny on Earth.
Not a single mentally sound person could ever understand the reasons for
which this area and the prevailing thugs of the desert have been allowed to
participate in the UN. This is the unique country in the world where a woman

3. is not allowed to watch a movie or attend a theatrical piece if male actors are
playing. Women are not even allowed to drive a car, but male teenagers are;
this is the reason homosexuality in Saudi Arabia is attested among more than
90% of its 'male' population.
All this happens, because any laws that originate from modern legislations
and are introduced in the God-damned realm are never respected by the local
barbarians. In fact, laws that do not emanate from the ill-perceived and
largely misinterpreted Sharia of the past cannot be enforced. Saudi Arabia is
the realm of hysterical hatred of the 'Other' – whoever he/she may be. This
desolate place is the territory of Ignorance and Tenebrous Inhumanity
whereby Human Rights violations are incommensurable, as they occur at
every moment.
The country has been established after an unprecedented bloodshed occurred
in order to allow the Saudi obscurantist and pedophiliac murderers to rule as
the undisputed masters of the lawless territory. Britain is largely responsible
for this, and the UK authorities have still to offer apologies and regret for this
bleak page of the World History.
The criminal and inhuman Saudi thugs were supported by the British (treaty
of December 1915) in their evil plan to butcher the Meccan religious
authorities and the plan was carried out in the well-known Mecca 1925
events. Certainly, the Meccan religious authorities were right in not offering
the anti-Islamic, Satanic Saudis any credentials of political and religious
legitimacy.
Only the deposed Sultan was the only source of religious and political
legitimacy throughout the Islamic world; pathetic English politicians,
diplomats, statesmen and agents idiotically thought that it was possible for
Britain to shape a decision in this regard, and favor its supposed puppets
(against the Rashidis in 1922)!
The only decision the British influenced in Arabia, namely the imposition of
the Saudi criminals, was at the same time
1. a ferocious denial of European Enlightenment, Humanism, and Democratic
Ideals,
2. a paranoid suicidal act that stripped Europe in its totality from any right to
Lights, Human Rights, and Democracy Advocacy,
3. an immoral deed that tarnished irreversibly the World Image of
Christianity, and
4. the Birth Certificate of Islamic Terrorism.
The idiots of the Foreign Office, and of the Whitehall, thought they were able
to put an end to the Islamic Caliphate, and to eradicate the Islamic world's
chief authority after the Sultan's deposal. Doing so, the English inhuman

4. paranoids accelerated the rise of the phenomenon of Islamic Terrorism.
Incorrigible and irredeemable, the colonial establishments of France and
England cannot understand even in the year 2006 that countries like Saudi
Arabia cannot be allowed to exist. They consist in a direct insult of 6000 years
of Human History.
Saudi Arabia truly endangers the entire world with its pernicious willingness
to secretively promote Islamic Terrorism, and in the name of its fake Islam, to
diffuse antihuman evilness and Satanic hatred all over the world. Meeting
with the cannibalistic Saudi representatives and thuggish diplomats of the
worst nomadic sort is a most deplorable option for ambassadors and
statesmen of countries all over the world. These mendacious and lewd
humanoids cheat all the Westerners by promising cooperation and Islamic
Terrorism containment, while at the same time they promote Terrorism with
their petrodollars.
Consequently, Saudi Arabia is the first country that must be kept out of Iraq;
even diplomatic relations must not be allowed. At a preliminary stage, the
Iraqi – Saudi border should be entirely wired, and as soon as the US imposes
order in Iraq, the plan for the ultimate demise of the Saudi barbaric realm
must be executed.
Saudi Arabia cannot be allowed to exist; its existence signifies automatically
death threat for the entire Western World, as the country's existence consists
in grave menace for the Mankind’s best ideals, moral concepts, and spiritual
principles.
We cannot afford to consider as an 'achievement' the fact that not a single
person in the world has ever suggested that the three aforementioned
countries should be involved in the Iraq ordeal so far; it was due to simple
reasoning and basic logic. Quite strangely, this approach did not concern the
two other neighbors of Mesopotamia.
Syria
Syria – this is a technical entity that represents nothing more than another
tyranny well-prepared and put into function by the colonial powers. Syria is
not a country; remarkably, the local populations did not demand any national
independence in 1918, as they did not consist in a nation of their own! As in
many other cases of direct or indirect colonial involvement, France and the
few local pro-French agents failed to explain to the local masses why they
should secede from the Ottoman Empire.
The shameful, bribed agents of colonial France did their best to systematically
defame the Ottoman administration and to progressively turn the local
populations against their own country (i.e. the Ottoman Empire), and for this
reason thousands of Ottoman citizens had to flee from these Ottoman

5. provinces as exposed to accusations for high treason. In brief, the technical
entity 'Syria' was formed against the will of its populations.
This was the typical colonial practice:
1. attract few local people with promises of material wealth and with minimal
bribes,
2. convince the attracted ones to become dissident voices within their own
country, i.e. to be high traitors,
3. fanaticize (through use of the bribed dissidents and traitors) and duly
manipulate the local masses on a plan that would significantly promote the
colonial interests and detrimentally damage the Ottoman interests,
4. expose subsequently the local masses to normal and natural Ottoman
reprisals, which were rightful and lawful to occur because any country exists
in order to maintain public order among its citizens and to defend its
interests,
5. keep a double face and voice, when the gullible local dissidents were
exposed to reprisals (persecution, jail, exile, capital penalty); the colonial
diplomats were always aware of the fact that their bribed local agents and
dissidents would be exposed to obviously and duly nefarious results as
shameful traitors.
The double face of the colonial diplomats involved the following:
a. extorting the dissidents to have them engaged more actively in acts against
their own country (providing them with false info supposedly obtained
through diplomatic way, according to which the dissidents’ fate had already
been decided upon),
b. extorting the Ottoman authorities by mendaciously providing them with
insightful that would make them take even more severe measures against the
dissidents, and at the same time
c. accusing the Ottoman Empire for genocides, discrimination against the
Christian populations, and all sorts of discredited policies.
These practices brought the technical entity 'Syria' to 'existence'; ever since not
a single political party, intellectual group or academic circle of the artificial
state was able to truly assess what had happened to them, and what sort of
'national' 'independence' had been unnecessarily but forcefully adjusted upon
them. The country shifted to cruel dictatorship, being plunged into severe
analphabetism, grave underdevelopment, permanent stagnation, social
apathy and absolute darkness. Minority groups became thus omnipotent
establishments and carried out multi-dimensional oppression, exporting the
burden of Damascus to Phoenicia that the disreputable French colonizers
tried to monstrously arabize, shaping another bogus-nation, the so-called
'Lebanon'.
Syria encapsulates the same monstrous model that the world had to face in
the desperate case of Iraq. So, a mentally sound person could immediately

6. understand that any Syrian contact with Iraq is not properly speaking
'contact' but contamination.
What can people belonging to the murderous Bashir Assad’s gang possibly do
in Iraq? Murder politicians and kill Christian deputies?
The first question a mentally sound person would ask as regards Syria's
possible 'help' for a solution in Iraq is this:
- Which is the country with more oppressed and more discriminated
minorities, Iraq or Syria?
Another, quite pertinent, question would be the following:
- How Syria, with its minorities more marginalized and more terrorized than
those of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, can bring in anything positive in Iraq?
A third question would be the next:
- How a country with a provocative record of inhuman atrocities in Lebanon
can do better in another country?
The most conclusive question would be:
- What was longer, worse, crueler and more barbaric a subjugation of a
foreign country? The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait or the Syrian occupation of
Lebanon?
A wise stratagem would be to suggest that Syria gets involved in Iraq, after
the tyrannical regime of Damascus offers to all the linguistic, religious and
ethnic groups of Syria the constitutional privileges offered by the US to those
of Iraq.
Until then anyone, who thinks about the continuation of the Syrian
abomination as a humanly acceptable possibility, must be reminded the
sociopolitical realities confronted by the Syrian people on daily basis; they are
of ethnic, linguistic, and religious nature.
The ruling Alawis (branch of Shia Islam) are all involved in the tyrannical
administration, with nepotism and tribalism being overwhelming; yet, the
Alawis represent about 16% of the country’s population. The oppressed
groups include Aramaeans (belonging to various Christian denominations)
12%, Sunni Kurds 12%,, Sunni Circassians 3%, Druze Neo-Phoenicians 3%,
Armenians 2%, Turkic peoples 2%, and Sunni Arabic speaking people 50%.
Practically speaking, the most urgent concern about Damascus is not its

7. involvement in Iraq but the final dissolution and split of the country (I am
sorry; the split of the 'technical entity' I mean) into mainly four con-federal
provinces: Sunni, Alawi, Aramaean and Kurdish. The end of Syria must come
soon, as the ultimate liberation of its long martyred peoples.
Iran
Iran – this is the realm of the Great Satan, i.e. the Nuclear Ayatullahs and the
imbecile president, who intends to exterminate several billions of people,
until his long awaited burlesque and charlatan Messiah of ‘Mahdi’ appears to
save us and mend the world (or what will have been left after the Iranian Shia
'effort' to finally convince this bogus-Messiah to appear in public)!
The country consists of numerous oppressed ethnic, religious, and linguistic
groups that are ruled with cruel and inhuman practices; the paranoid regime's
totalitarian policies are denounced by more than 75% of its numerous nations
and ethno-religious groups.
With Arabic-speaking Aramaeans in Khuzestan, Syriac-speaking Aramaeans
throughout Western Iran, Azeris, Kurds, Turks, Turkmens, Loris, Bakhtiaris,
Qashqais, Armenians, Bahais, Ahl-e Haq, Zoroasterian Parsis, Baluchis,
Afghanis, and Persians (the latter totaling approximately 45% of the entire
population) deprived of all basic Human Rights, Iran is a real Cemetery of
Nations.
Plunging the masses into ultimate misery and abject poverty, the Ayatullah
gang uses the national income as a means to pursue nuclear and military
emancipation and to carry out war expansion plans throughout the Middle
East, primarily targeting Israel, and through Israel, America, Europe,
Christianity, Vatican, the Western World, Turkey and various other regional
countries. Iran ceaselessly rekindles anti-Christian and anti-Russian policies
and strife in the Caucasus region and in Central Asia where the main obstacle
to its obscurantist ambitions is Turkey.
Having this country involved in Iraq corresponds to what Lenin used to say
about the capitalists, namely that they would sell the communists the rope to
hang them with. Instead of considering pathetic options like this, the US
should engage in military action in Iran that would lead to total destruction of
the nuclear facilities and to ultimate split of the murderous theocracy to at
least 6 different, independent countries – UN member states: Azerbaijan –
Turkmenistan, Soranistan - Goranistan, Lorestan – Bakhtiaristan, Aramaean
Khuzestan, Persia (Fars), and Baluchistan.
Turkey – the only solution in Iraq
The only solution in Iraq is Turkey; Turkish and American soldiers imposing
peace and resettlement to the Aramaeans, the Turkmens, the Kurds, and the
Shia, and administering the due punishment to the Sunnis, who backed en

8. masse both, Saddam tyranny and Al Qaeda terrorism.
Renamed as Aram Nahrain – Mesopotamia, split into four con-federal states
(Aram, Turkmeneli, Soranistan, Basra Sanjak for the Shia), and controlled by
Turkish soldiers, Mesopotamia will find peace. The only solution for Iraq is
the ultimate return to the country from where it was illegally detached and
confiscated by the Anti-Christian colonial powers, i.e. France and England.
This would be the beginning of the end for the colonial rule in the Middle
East; as it is the sole non-colonial option, it should be viewed by the Bush
administration as the only possible.
(first published in www.americanchronicle.com)
By Prof. Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Published: 11/22/2006