First published on 27th January 2011 in American Chronicle, Buzzle and AfroArticles Excerpt: Siad Barre - Abdirashid Ali Shermarke - John Kennedy Notice that Shermarke, as Somali premier, visited Kennedy in November 1962, established a strong bond with the legendary American president, who was assassinated in November 1963, and then lost in Somalia´s parliamentary elections of March 1964, only to be finally elected and sworn as president in June 10, 1967; his first assassination attempt occurred in 1968. It is also noteworthy that Shermarke would establish a bridge between the non-aligned movement and Kennedy´s America, a dreadful perspective for the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge that assassinated both presidents.

1. 40 Centuries& 20 Yearsof Inexorable,
InfinitePunt - Somalia, East Africa'sMost
RadiantNation, I
Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
January 27, 2011
-----------------------------------------------------
Exactly 20 years ago, all the Somalis woke up in an incredible nightmare applied to
them by the criminal Freemasonic gangsters and their puppets, the statesmen of the
New World Order. The great President Siad Barre left the presidential building at
Mogadishu in the evening of January 26, 1991, trying to find elsewhere support to
counter-attack the insurgents, recapture his capital, and reinstall the Somali public
order that so much promoted all the Somalis and so much disturbed the racist and
evil, colonial powers – all those who had for more than a century invented every
possible devilish trickery to annihilate a 40-century old, great nation.
Siad Barre was not a military dictator, as the criminally distortive, inhumanly
vicious, utterly Freemasonic, disreputable pseudo-encyclopaedia Wikipedia
shamelessly pretends in its malignantly composed entry
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siad_Barre).Siad Barre was a great man and a great
president for all the Somalis – I repeat it: for all the Somalis –; as it is normal, he
made serious mistakes, like every other great man and statesman.
Who did not make mistakes? Hammurapi of Babylonia? Thutmosis III of Egypt?
Hattushilis III of the Hittite Empire? Sennacherib of Assyria? Shorkaror of Ethiopia
(Kush)? Cambyses of Iran? Alexander the Greatof Macedonia? Octavian Augustus of
Rome? Harun al Rashid of the Abbasid Caliphate? Suleiman the Magnificent of the
Ottoman Empire? They all made mistakes; and they all were great.
Siad Barre´s achievements clearly propel him to the peak of African 20th century
statesmanship; History nominates him as the Greatest African Statesman of the 20th
century; I must make it clear at this point that, as historian, I speak of the real, true
History that leaves an irrevocable stamp - not of the fake, Freemasonic pseudo-
history that has currently invaded the world´s publications and mass media only to
be soon diluted and evaporated, along with the forthcoming physical obliteration of
the Satanic organization.

2. But this article´s purpose is neither to be a funeral oration nor to serve as a eulogy
and a commendation.
New World OrderHysteria against President Siad Barre
It would however be interesting to examine why the New World Order regime, with
its puppets of diplomats, statesmen and academia, with all its disreputable
publications, and with all its biased portals, like Wikipedia, describe Siad Barre as a
military dictator, and incessantly try to depict his great work in the most unworthy
manner. The answer to this question is simple:
Siad Barre was not "theirs".
Siad Barre did not belong to that low class of filthy and miserable persons, who - for
the sake of otherwise useless material benefits - compromise their ideas, soften their
opinions, accept compromises to their ideals, make immoral concessions, assuage
leaders of superpowers, bow to the superpowers' immoral commands or evil
demands, and alleviate their Satanic thirst for power and their bestial greed for
material goods.
In other words, Siad Barre was not and could not be bought up by the criminal elite
of this world that must all be mercilessly decapitated, eradicated as soon as possible,
and forgotten forever.
Few have the terrible disadvantage (don't view it as a privilege!) to know the vicious
nature of this world's political order and the inhumanity of the hidden beasts who
rule from the backstage; nothing infuriates these beasts more than their inability to
'buy' and therefore control one person, and more importantly a political leader, a
leading intellectual, and a statesman.
Siad Barre paid dearly for his intransigent morality, and his inflexible ideas.
But this aforementioned sentence gives, in and by itself, the real dimensions of our
rotten, decadent and agonizing world; one's "inflexible ideas" are today viewed
negatively! This is incredible in the History of the Mankind; and at the same time, it
demonstrates the need for overwhelming destruction of the world (or any world)
that cannot "accept" a Great Siad Barre as example of statesmanship.
What is or can be better than an "inflexible idea"?
Did Prophet Muhammad have flexible ideas to just suit the filthy needs and interests
of this or that chieftain?
Were Jesus' ideas flexible enough to accommodate the criminal interests of the
Pharisees?
Did the Great Architects of the Sumerian, Elamite, Babylonian,Egyptian and
Kushitic pyramids accept to compromise their plans as per the needs of their rulers
and administration?
Did Socrates decide to make some concessions to the execrable, totalitarian, and
inhuman regime of Athens that today´s Freemasons viciously depict as "ideal"

3. because in it the slaves constituted the outright majority, the women had no political
rights, and the men practiced pedophilia excessively?
The conclusion is simple: a world without inflexible ideas is an evil and worthless
world bought up by few hidden, bestial rulers. Such world must be and will be
eliminated at all costs.
Freemasonic Paranoia against President Siad Barre
It is however quite hypocritical to pretend that the vicious effort of Siad Barre´s
denigration is just due to the fact that he was a military who overtook the political
power. This is a filthy Freemasonic lie.
Today´s distortive mass media would denigrate any president of Somalia under any
circumstances whatsoever. As it is known, Siad Barre, as Vice Commander of the
Somali Army, and the entire Somali military leadership undertook a coup after the
assassination of the elected President Abdirashid Ali Shermarke (October 15, 1969).
The coup was undertaken a few days later (October 21, 1969 – just on the day of the
state funerals, notice this!) in order to ensure continuation in the national Somali
politics and unwavering dedication to the Somali Nation´s goals. No blood shed, no
reaction noticed, no protestation expressed – it was clearly a political act that was
nationally approved at the rate of 95% plus.
If the assassinated President Abdirashid Ali Shermarke had not been murdered, he
would have executed most of President Siad Barre´s program of national vocation;
by this, I don´t mean that President Abdirashid Ali Shermarke, had he survived the
second assassination plot against him, would have committed President Siad Barre´s
mistakes – I am referring to the general outline of a national political program that
encompassed the introduction of a new alphabet,the national integrity and the
rightful incorporation of Somali territories unreasonably left outside Somalia, the
anti-clan social integration programs,and the economic modernization policies.
All this will remain obscure to most, if the correct link is not made; the assassination
of President Abdirashid Ali Shermarke was a vicious act that unveils the identity of
the Somali Nation´s Satanic enemies. It was not a matter of coincidence or ´´the act of
a madman´´, as the criminal gangsters of Freemasonry customarily and idiotically
diffuse through the antihuman, terrorist, global mass media that they control.
President Abdirashid Ali Shermarke had long been targeted; identifying the
masterminds of the abhorrent act of his assassination is not difficult. They are
identical with the perpetrators of the assassination of President Abdirashid Ali
Shermarke´s best political friend and counterpart: President John Kennedy.
Siad Barre - Abdirashid Ali Shermarke - John Kennedy
Notice that Shermarke, as Somali premier, visited Kennedy in November 1962,
established a strong bond with the legendary American president, who was
assassinated in November 1963, and then lost in Somalia´s parliamentary elections of
March 1964, only to be finally elected and sworn as president in June 10, 1967; his
first assassination attempt occurred in 1968.It is also noteworthy that Shermarke
would establish a bridge between the non-aligned movement and Kennedy´s
America, a dreadful perspective for the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge that
assassinated both presidents.

4. This is what The New York Times published in an article titled ´´Somali Premier
Asks Army Rule´´ (September 08, 1963):
´´Soviet and Chinese Support of "Unification" Pledged
Mogadishu, Somalia, Sept. 6 – The Premier of Somalia, in a speech published today,
said only a strong military government in the republic could achieve unification with
Somalis in neighboring countries.
The Premier, Abdirashid Ali Shermarke, referred to Somalis living in French
Somaliland, Ethiopia and Kenya. The Republic of Somalia is made up of the former
Italian Somaliland and British Somaliland, on the northeast corner of the continentof
Africa.
Mr. Shermarke spoke at the airport here on his return this week after the breakdown
of talks in Rome to discuss the demand of the Somalis in Kenya`s Northern Frontier
District to be allowed to secede from Kenya and join Somalia.
He said he would not hesitate to scrap civil government and hand over full powers
to the military in the interest of the unity.
"Our democratic system, though theoretically admirable, is unadapted to the present
situation," he declared´´.
(http://www.biyokulule.com/view_content.php?articleid=2868)
Related videos:
http://wn.com/somali_prime_minister_abdirashid_ali_sharmarke_visits_the_us_in
_1962
http://wn.com/premier_minister_abirashid_ali_shermarke_meets_with_pres_john_
f_kennedy?orderby=viewCount
This document clearly demonstrates that there is no difference between the two
presidencies (Shermarke and Barre), and that the Vice Commander of the Somali
Army Siad Barre would have eventually be called by the elected president of Somalia
to implement policies of Identity, Integrity, Freedom, Justice and Right that his
government eventually had difficulty to carry out.
I will further analyze this notorious article in a forthcoming part of the ´´40 Centuries
& 20 Years of Inexorable, Infinite Punt - Somalia, East Africa´s Most Radiant Nation´´
series, because The New York Times has always reflected the interests, the ideas, and
the plots of the world´s Freemasonic elite and therefore, although situated in the
camp of the Democrats, it pursued a subtle anti-Kennedy policy, presenting insights
from the Kennedy camp to better inform and warn Kennedy´s enemies. I merely note
here that the aforementioned excerpt was written as a warning to the hidden
Freemasonic elite that the Somali Kennedy, President Abdirashid Ali Shermarke,
should not be left unhindered for too long.
Clearly Siad Barre committed many errors. His worst was that he did not take
seriously the world elite´s attitude to the Somali Nation´s rightful claim for national

5. integrity and independence.
All three, President John Kennedy, President Abdirashid Ali Shermarke, and
President Siad Barre, notwithstanding their markedly different backgrounds
(diplomatic - political, religious – academic, and military respectively) viewed their
societies and the entire world as a place of honest citizens who organize their lives in
an unbiased manner without secrecy and plots.
All three ascribed their public action to the ideal and the principle so perfectly
expressed in President Kennedy´s words:
"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a
people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to
secret proceedings.We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and
unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are
cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed
society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in
insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there
is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized
upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship
and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it´s in my control.
And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or
military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to
stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public
the facts they deserve to know."
(amongst others:
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/JFK_Video_Speech.htm)
About President Siad Barre´s mistakes I will expand in a forthcoming article.
Note
Picture: In Somalia, nobody lives now better than in the times of President
Abdirashid Ali Shermarke, and President Siad Barre. From:
http://www.bartamaha.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/siad-barre.jpg