2. • increasing and supporting international research activities;
• performing quality, cutting-edge international research and
scholarship;
• supporting the idea of openness in higher education;
• creating an intellectually stimulating environment for internal and
external fellows;
• offering an international, interdisciplinary Master's program to
translate research and scholarship into teaching, knowledge transfer,
and practice.
COER Aims and Purpose
3. Folie3
So, what sort of open? Openness in HE
Open Education
Open Learning
Open Pedagogy
Open Educational
Resources (OER)
Open Textbooks
...
Open Access
Publishing
Open Data
Open Peer Review
...
Teaching & Learning Research
Open Scholarship, Open Educational Practices (OEP), Open Source Software
4. Folie4
A working definition…
Open Education in the context of higher education refers to a
set of open educational practices (OEP) that aim at widening
access to university education. Access is gained through
admission without formal entry requirements (Open Learning)
but rather through the recognition of formally and informally
acquired qualifications and competencies (PLAR, RPL). Digital
media and learning materials (e.g. OER), tools and systems are
used to provide flexible learning opportunities worldwide
independent of time and space.
5. COER Founding Members
• Researchers from:
– U of Heidelberg, Hamburg, Duisburg-Essen, Oldenburg
(Germany)
Prof. Michael
Kerres
Prof. Kerstin
Mayrberger
Prof. Marco
Kalz
Prof. Olaf
Zawacki-Richter
6. – Anadolu U (Turkey)
– METU (Turkey) & U Oberta de Catalunya (Spain)
– Int. Christian U (Japan), Penn State U (USA)
Dr. Aras
Bozkurt
Prof. Insung
Jung
Prof. Adnan
Qayyum
Prof. Hakan
Aydin
Prof. Yasar
Kondaki
Prof. Albert
Sangra
7. – Athabasca U & Royal Roads U (Canada)
– Perth (Australia), The U of the South Pacific (Fiji)
– Beijing U, Shantou Radio & Television U (China)
Prof. George
Veletsianos
Prof. Dianne
Conrad
Prof. Colin
Latchem
Prof. Som
Naidu
Prof. Junhong
Xiao
Prof. Jingjing
Zhang
8. – U of South Africa (South Africa)
Prof. Jennifer
Roberts
Prof. Paul
Prinsloo
9. – Postdoctoral Researchers and Research Associates (U of OL)
Dr. Wolfgang
Müskens
Dr. Victoria
Marin
Dr. Svenja
Bedenlier
Melissa Bond
Carina Dolch Andrea
Broens
12. Educational Technology &
Learning Design
Open and Distance
Learning
International Education
Macro-Level
Meso-Level
Micro-Level
Research Areas
13.
Content analysis and systematic Reviews
Olaf
Colin
Dianne
Som
Hakan
Insung
Paul
Jenny
Adnan
Junghong
Jingjing
George
Albert
Marko
Michael
rstin
Aras
Yasar
Wolfgang
Svenja
Carina
ndrea
Melissa
Victoria
Lisa
Olaf
Colin
Dianne
Som
Hakan
Insung
Paul
Jenny
Adnan
Junghong
Jingjing
George
Albert
ko
Michael
Aras
Yasar
fgang
Svenja
Carina
Melissa
Victoria
Lisa
2018
2016
15.
Educational technology and media usage patterns
2015
Translation by Junhong Xiao (2017)
Olaf
Colin
Dianne
Som
Hakan
Insung
Paul
Jenny
Adnan
Junghong
Jingjing
George
Albert
Marko
Michael
in
Aras
Yasar
Wolfgang
Svenja
Carina
ea
Melissa
Victoria
Lisa
D I S T A N C E E D U C A T I O N I N C H I N A
变化中的学生媒体使用模式:
来自德国的调查结果
□ 〔德〕奥拉夫· 扎瓦克奇- 里克特 〔德〕卡莱娜· 克雷默
肖俊洪 译
【摘 要】
3,666名德国大学生分别在2012年 (N=2,339) 和2015年 (N=1,327) 参加旨在了解传统和所谓非
传统学生媒体使用模式的调查。他们提供了自己拥有或可以使用的数字设备的情况以及在学习过程使
用媒体、e- learning工具和服务的情况。数字媒体和教育技术的发展是高等教育一个充满活力的领
域,因此本研究特别关注 2012- 2015年间媒体使用行为的变化,采用潜在类别分析法分析学生反馈,
并据此建立媒体使用模式分类系统。研究发现了四种媒体使用模式:娱乐型用户、外围用户、高级用
户和工具型用户。工具型用户中非传统学生多于传统学生。总体而言,所有 (数字) 媒体、工具和服
务的使用频率在2012- 2015年间呈下降趋势。本文还简要介绍了一项质性研究的设计,以深化和进一
步验证本研究的量化结果。
【关键词】 媒体使用模式;媒体使用类型;非传统学生;教学设计;媒体选择
【中图分类号】 【文献标识码】 【文章编号】 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
DOI:10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.20170420.002 ⽹网络出 版时间: 2017-04-20 17:46:23
⽹网络
出
版地址: http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4089.G4.20170420.1746.004.html
16.
Open and Distance Learning Systems
Olaf
Colin
Dianne
Som
Hakan
Insung
Paul
Jenny
Adnan
Junghong
Jingjing
George
Albert
Aras
Yasar
Svenja
Melissa
ia
Lisa
…with chapters by Colin, Hakan, Paul,
Som, Svenja, and Yasar et al.
2018
17.
PLAR – Widening participation
Since
2016
2011
Olaf
Colin
Dianne
Som
Hakan
Insung
Paul
Jenny
Adnan
Junghong
Jingjing
George
Albert
Marko
Yasar
Wolfgang
Svenja
Carina
Melissa
Victoria
Lisa
19.
• Currently under development to begin 2019/2020
• Offered through the Center for Lifelong Learning (C3L)
• Fully online program
• MTEL Director: Lisa Marie Blaschke
• MoA signed with UNISA in July 2018:
Master of Management of Technology-
Enhanced Learning (MTEL)
21. • Jennifer Fajardo
(International Christian University, Japan)
• Frank Loglo
(Technology University College, Ghana, Germany)
• Elisa Bruhn
(University of Oldenburg, Germany, USA)
• Martine Schophuizen
(Open University NL, Netherlands)
Colin Latchem Postgraduate
Travel Grant
22.
University of Oldenburg (Germany)
Faculty of Education and Social Sciences
Institute of Education
Center for Open Education Research (COER)
@_coer_
https://www.uni-oldenburg.de/coer/
Contact
Editor's Notes
My vision or wish for the COER would be that the COER will be the international research hub for research into open education. This of course depends on the people who work with and in the COER. And I think, we have put together a great team
But before I introduce the founding COER members, I would like to say a few words about the notion of Open Education…
As I said, we are supporters of the idea of openness in education, higher education in particular. But what kind of openness do we mean when we talk about open education.
There are so many "open" terms in the context of teaching and learning as well as research, like…
As many writers argue, a culture of open scholarship and practices is needed to propell this idea of openness in education.
At least in the German discussion open education is often reduced to the topics related to open educational resources (OER). But open education is an omnibus term that comprises a lot more than access to educational resources.
Here comes a first draft for a working definition.
We can argue or querrel about this definition – but this would be my starting point.
When I prepared for this meeting, I asked our collegues to let me know with whom they already have worked together – in a project, as a co-author or as an editorial board member.
The point I would like to make here is that the COER is not just a virtual center with some top shot names – it is really a living network of active collaboration. This is the social network diagram that emerged from this analysis.
I must apologize for being ego-centric here, but as I was the one who started this initiative, I am quite in the center of this network. All members are of course connected with me in some way or the other.
To speak with SNA terms, we are now here to further improve the densitiy and betweenness of our network – to increase the ties between the nodes in the network.
I just would like to highlight a few things that we have already done together… looking at the different research strands and levels.
We are doing systematic reviews and content analysis to explore research trends and to synthesize research results to inform evidence-based practice.
Together with Michael, Melissa, Svenja and Katja we are editing a new book about Systematic Reviews in educational research. The book will be published with Springer Open at the end of next year.
Quality assurance is another important topic on the institutional meso level: Insung and Colin did a lot of work on QA and accreditaion in distance education and e-learning. They also developed a framwork for the evaluation of OER.
And in the German context we developed a quality model for OER together with the Hamburg Open Online University and Kerstin Mayrberger. This model is also based on Insung's and Colin's framework.
Then on the mircro level of teaching and learing in open and distance education we are looking at media usage pattern of students for their learning at the university. The results are helpful to improve the instructional design and to inform the media selection process. Over 4.000 students where involved and the results were published in IRRODL and also in Distance Education in China, translated by Junhong Xiao.
Going back to the macro level of Open and Distance Education systems we published a book in which we contrasted and compared ODE systems in different countries. The first volume is about Australia, Europ and the Americas. The second volume will be released hopefully next month and will cover Asia, Africa and the Middle East.
For me, prior learning accreditation and recognition is part of open education, as it is all about widening access to higher education for non-traditional students.
A leader in this field is Dianne Conrad. Dianne facilitated a workshop for us here in Oldenburg two years ago, and in the meantime we have implemented a PLAR service (we call it Anrechnung and PLARnet) which is highly successful. Many students benefit from this service now, and I think this is a good example for translating open education research into practice.
We are also doing research in the field of international education. Many institutions are using online education to reach international target groups. For example, in Australia the international education activity is the biggest service export industry.
In one study that was recently published in the journal Higher Education we investigated the flow of international student mobility and identifies for example Turkey as an emerging regional hub.
And last but not least we currently developing a new fully online Masater of Management of Technology-Enhanced Learning Program, the MTEL, that will be offered through the Center for Lifelong Learning.
Accreditation will be done next year and we will start to enroll students in the winter term 2019/2020.
I am very glad about our cooperation with the University of South Africa. Professor Gugo Moche, the Vice-President of UNISA, was here in Summer to sign a Memorandum of Agreement. Within the MTEL we will offer a certificate program for professional staff development at UNISA.
Born in England in 1933, suddenly passed away on 3 July 2018 in Perth, Australia, aged 84.