History
Current Technologies
BWR
PWR
Limitations
Resources
Thermal Inefficiencies
Maintenance
New Fission Reactor Designs and Benefits
(GFR) Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor
(LFR) Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor
(MSR) Molten Salt Reactor
(SFR) Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor
(SCWR) Supercritical-Water-Cooled Reactor
(VHTR) Very-High-Temperature Reactor
New Fusion Design Technology
Tokamak
Results
CHICAGO PILE 1 DECEMBER 2, 1942
Created by Enrico Fermi
Consisted of a Pile of
Uranium Contained
Within Graphite Bricks
Control Rods Manually
Operated
Built on a Racket Court
Underneath the Alonzo
Stagg Field Stadium of the
University of Chicago
EXPERIMENTAL BREEDER BEGIN OPERATING
REACTOR I DECEMBER 20, 1951
World’s First Nuclear
Power Plant to Generate
Electricity
Decommissioned in
1964
Located in Arco Idaho
a.k.a (Atomic City)
Nuclear Reactor Became
Site of Idaho National
Labs
THERMAL
INEFFICIENCIES MAINTENANCE
Current Efficiencies of PWR Every 1 to 2 Years a
and BWR Designs are Limited Conventional Nuclear Plant
by the Operating
Needs to Refuel Portions of
Temperatures of Their
Rankine Cycles. the Fuel Core Assembly
Average Efficiency is 33% Every 5 Years the Turbine-
1500 MWe Nuclear Power Generator Must be Inspected
Plant Actually Produces 4500 1-2 Months Spent Offline for
MW of Power and Wastes 3000
MW. Each Maintenance Process
3000 MW of Power can Power
876,000 Homes
Average Inlet/Outlet Temps:
275˚C/325˚C (525˚F/650˚F)
Efficiency = ( 1 – Cold temperature / Hot temperature ) * 100
Members:
Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Japan, the Republic of Korea,
the Republic of South Africa, the United Kingdom, the United
States, Switzerland, Euratom, the People’s Republic of China,
and the Russian Federation
Designs:
(GFR) Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor
(LFR) Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor
(MSR) Molten Salt Reactor
(SFR) Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor
(SCWR) Supercritical-Water-Cooled Reactor
(VHTR) Very-High-Temperature Reactor
Reactor Power: 600MWth
Net Efficiency: 48%
Coolant/Outlet Temp:
490˚C/850˚C
(914˚F/1562˚F)
Thermodynamic Cycle:
Brayton Cycle Operating
on Helium Gas
Small/Modular
Able to be Used as a Conventional Nuclear
Power Plant Waste Conversion Facility
Able to Utilize Pebble Bed Fuel Technology in
Some Designs
Hydrogen and Electrical Capabilities
Reactor Power:
50-150 MWe
300-400 MWe
1200 MWe
Coolant/Outlet Temp:
1022˚F-1472˚F
Thermodynamic Cycle:
Brayton Cycle Operating on
CO2 Gas
Rankine Cycle Operating on
Super Critical H20
Easily Scalable Design
Long Refueling Intervals (10-30 Years)
Nuclear Waste Management Capabilities
Hydrogen and Electrical Capabilities
Medium Size Design
Design Appropriate for Hydrogen Production
Fusion is the Process Powering the Sun
Recreating Difficulties on Earth
Material Limitations
Gravitational Limitations
Solutions
Control Plasma Created From Ionized Atoms Using
Super-Cooled Super-Conducting Magnets Named
Tokamaks
The Joint European Torus (JET) was Able to
Produce a 16 MW Pulse for 1 Second in 1997
The Tora Supra was Able to Sustain Plasma
Confinement for 6.5 Minutes in 2003.
Current Goal is to Achieve Power
Multiplication of 10x
Radioactive Half-life of Tritium is 12.3 Years
Instead of the 700 Million Year Half-life of
Uranium
The Fusion Process Has a Higher Energy/Mass
Fuel Ratio Than the Fission Process
Nuclear Power Remains a Very Viable Option
Even Without Future Technological
Advancements
Nuclear Advancements Will be Able to Aid
Developing Countries With Both Electrical and
Water Generation Capabilities
Generation IV Nuclear
Plants Allow For the
Possibility of a Hydrogen
Fueled Future
[1] (2011, June 29). U.S & World Population Clocks. U.S. Census Bureau. [Online] Available:
http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html
[2] AREVA Communications Department, All About Nuclear Energy: From Atom to Zirconium. AREVACOM ed. Paris,
France: AREVA, April 2008
[3] “Nuclear Energy,” Alternative Energy, vol. 2, N. Schlager and J. Weisblatt, Eds. Detroit, MI: Thompson Gale, 2006,
pp. 169-208
[4] An Energy Landmark: Idaho’s Pioneering Experimental Breeder Reactor-I. Idaho National Laboratory. [Online]
Available: http://www.inl.gov/ebr/
[5] A. B. Reynolds, Bluebells and Nuclear Energy. Madison, WI: Cogito Books, 1996
[6] New Nuclear Technology Opportunities: Coal Steam from a Nuclear Boiler. Coal2Nuclear. [Online] Available:
http://www.coal2nuclear.com/coal_steam_from_a_nuclear_boiler.htm
[7] (2002 Dec.). Ten Nations Preparing Today for Tomorrow’s Energy Needs: A Technology Roadmap for Generation
IV Nuclear Energy Systems. U.S. DOE Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee and the Generation IV International
Forum. [Online] Available: http://www.ne.doe.gov/genIV/documents/gen_iv_roadmap.pdf
[8] S. Hough (2009 April). Supercritical Rankine Cycle: A Synopsis of the Cycle, it’s Background, Potential
Applications and Engineering Challenges. University of Idaho. [Online] Available:
http://www.if.uidaho.edu/~gunner/ME443-543/HW/rankine.pdf
[9] M. Ragheb. (2011, July 1). Chapter 1: Nuclear Reactor Concepts and Thermodynamic Cycles. University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign. [Online] Available:
https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/mragheb/www/NPRE%20402%20ME%20405%20Nuclear%20Power%20Engineering/Nucle
ar%20Reactors%20Concepts%20and%20Thermodynamic%20Cycles.pdf
[10] ITER Organization. (2011) ITER: The Way to New Energy. ITER. [Online] Available: http://www.iter.org/
[11] (2011, March 9). Economics of Nuclear Power. World Nuclear Association. [Online] Available: http://www.world-
nuclear.org/info/inf02.html