This document is the preface and introduction to "The Music Producer's Survival Guide" by Brian M. Jackson. It provides background on the author and his educational and professional experiences in music and East-West psychology. It introduces the concept of an "integral" approach to discussing the many facets of music production. Key points: 1) The author has degrees in sociology, philosophy and East-West psychology and has worked with diverse artists. 2) The book takes an integral approach to discuss all aspects of music production holistically. 3) Integral theory provides a framework to discuss the parts and whole of music production.
The music producers survival guide chaos, creativity, and career in independent and electronic music by letruongan.com
1.
2. The Music Producer’s
Survival Guide
Chaos, Creativity, and Career in
Independent and Electronic Music
Brian M. Jackson
Cengage Learning PTR
Australia • Brazil • Japan • Korea • Mexico • Singapore • Spain • United Kingdom • United States
4. Dedicated to 8, ∞, 0, 1.61803398875, 011235813213455,
r > 3.57, Z = Z2
+ C, and especially 7.83 Hz.
5. Preface
The most damaging phrase in the language is: We’ve always done it this way.
–Grace Hopper
Reality is not composed of things or processes; it is not composed of atoms or quarks; it is not composed of wholes nor does it have any parts.
Rather, it is composed of whole/parts, or holons.
–Ken Wilber
Chaos is what we’ve lost touch with. This is why it is given a bad name. It is feared by the dominant archetype of our world, which is ego, which
clenches because its existence is defined in terms of control.
–Terence McKenna
Welcome. I truly hope you enjoy this book, on multiple levels. The Music Producer’s Survival Guide is as much a creative project for me as any
track or record I’ve produced. Obviously, I think I have something significant to share with the world, or I wouldn’t be writing a book such as
this. At the same time, this book ultimately is not about me. It is not an autobiography of a music producer. That said, on multiple occasions
I do share biographical stories and anecdotes when it serves a purpose—giving background on my thinking, using my personal history to
contextualize the present, to illustrate a point, and especially when I think you can learn something from my successes and mistakes.
I love what I do for a living. My professional passions are the intersections of music, audio, technology, education, culture, and
consciousness. Between my students, collaborators, and clients, I have literally worked with people at all levels of the industry—total
beginners, legendary DJs, multiplatinum heavy-metal legends, movie stars, multiple Grammy nominees and winners, brilliant software
developers, and countless otherwise-accomplished musicians, artists, and thinkers. This variety of experiences with such a diverse amalgam
of people sparked the inspiration for this book.
After consistently being asked the same sorts of questions from a nice sample of the aforementioned people, I realized I needed to write a
music-production book. After answering their questions, there was no one website, no one book, no one written source to which to refer
them for follow-up. Many of these questions were contextual or relational in their nature, meaning that it was my synthesis of information
that clarified the issues. So, in addition to my technical, creative, and cultural knowledge, I knew that my philosophical and intellectual
perspective would have to be a significant aspect of the project.
A Philosophical Survival Guide
Survival guides are practical by definition because they help ensure you are prepared via pragmatic expert advice and a slew of utilitarian
lists. Some intend to prepare you for unexpected, dangerous situations, be they hurricanes, getting lost in the wilderness, the zombie
apocalypse, while others emphasize navigating common difficult non-emergency scenarios, such as help with popular technologies or
personal finances. If not a survival guide for reading philosophy, “philosophical survival guide” may seem like an oxymoron or the premise
for a lost scene from Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life.
Unlike the typical survival guide that underscores immediate concerns, life as a technical-creative professional is an odyssey. Accordingly,
this book is equal parts practical and philosophical. In many ways, what really sets this book apart from all the many other books on
music-production topics is the perspective of your author. I do not claim to be the smartest, best-educated, most-talented, most-successful,
most-experienced, or most-knowledgeable person to write a music-production book. I am certainly nowhere in the vicinity of the most
famous or richest. However, it is my sincere belief that you have a unique book in your hands (and/or on your screen)—one that I hope
you find equally useful and inspiring.
I don’t blame you if you are already thinking something along these lines:
Oh, great. Another Gen X electronic musician who thinks he’s some sort of thinker or philosopher. So he’s read some Kurzweil, Bey, Stephenson,
Baudrillard, Pinchbeck, and his fill of books by Disinformation and RE/Search. He’s had his share of 5 a.m. discussions with other psychonauts about
holographic cyberspace chakras and the sound of one hand clapping as it relates to a post-apocalyptic, hyperdimensional, culture-jamming, open-
source, raw vegan–induced singularity while listening to the CD release of Alien Dreamtime: Space Time Continuum with Terence McKenna.
iv
6. Okay, sure. Maybe I’ve had a few such discussions. Who hasn’t? But in all seriousness, to put your mind at ease, I do have a few actual
degrees from respectable, accredited American institutions of higher learning. Although I’ve been active in music and music culture nearly
my whole life, I have a BS in sociology and philosophy (1994) and an MA (nearly ABD) in East-West psychology (1999). In fact, the focus
of my master’s thesis largely provides the philosophical and intellectual framework for the practical aspects of this book. It was the late
1990s, and I was in my late 20s, so with a complete, self-aware, ironic academic pretentiousness, I wanted to have the longest title in the
printed program at the graduation ceremony: “Complex thinking, perceiving, and meaning-making: The evolution of integral consciousness
and the paradigm of complexity.” (Actually, it turned out to be the second longest title.)
Enough on my bona fides.
This is a big-picture book that includes a ton of specific, practical, detailed discussion. I intend to clear up common confusions, bring
clarity to frequently murky topics, and provide context for many aspects of modern independent and electronic music production. As you
will see, there are many aptitudes and skill sets involved, and understanding how they overlap and relate to each other requires a solid
intellectual framework. There are many books on software, audio engineering, music composition, music business, music production,
record producers, and promoting your band, for starters. Many of them are quite good. Yet they primarily address only pieces of the
puzzle—a necessity for any in-depth discussion. So, to talk about how all the puzzle pieces fit together, we must need a “holistic”
approach, right?
According to Ken Wilber, if part-ism is “gross reductionism,” then holism is “subtle reductionism.” French thinker Edgar Morin breaks it
down for us: “Holism is a partial, one-dimensional, and simplifying vision of the whole. It reduces all other system-related ideas to the idea
of totality, whereas it should be a question of confluence. Holism thus arises from the paradigm of simplification…” (Journal of Social and
Evolutionary Systems, 1992). Required is a discussion not only of the parts and the whole, but also the relationship of the parts to each
other and to the whole, to other wholes and their parts, and so on and so forth. Fortunately for us, Integral philosophy is perfectly suited
to such an ambitious goal, and therefore I am taking an integral approach to this book.
Integral Philosophy and This Book
In December of 1994, after one semester of grad school at Western Michigan University, I walked away from a full ride (with stipend) and
moved to San Francisco to pursue music. Thanks to my friend Naomi, another recent transplant from the Kalamazoo DIY music scene,
I quickly landed a job at Royal Ground Coffee on Polk St. A few blocks down I found Fields Book Store, an amazing shop that was in
the same location from 1932 until February of 2013, when the new digital landscape forced it to go online only (fieldsbooks.com). There,
I discovered countless mind-opening books, including a few by psychiatrist Stanislav Grof, MD. Grof pioneered LSD psychotherapy
starting in 1955 (when it was still legal), which directly led to his co-founding of the field of transpersonal psychology in 1969 with
psychology pioneer Abraham Maslow.
After a few years as a barista in the wonderful freak show that is Polk St., in 1996 I started looking into grad schools to continue my
formal education. While looking through a Learning Annex pamphlet, I saw that Grof was lecturing at a school just a few blocks away, the
California Institute of Integral Studies (CIIS), and he also taught there! That fall, I became an East-West psychology PhD student at CIIS,
where I remained until the summer of 1999. While at CIIS, I had amazing professors for a wide variety of courses. Excluding the most
traditional and alternative, they ranged from Mahayana Buddhism and Vedanta, to transpersonal psychology and consciousness studies, to
chaos theory and linguistics. There, I was exposed to the works of many great thinkers and researchers, but only four of them became the
focus of my thesis: Robert Kegan, Jean Gebser, Edgar Morin, and Ken Wilber. Again, I left grad school for music, which is why I do not
have a PhD, just a master’s. From 1996 to 2000, I was also in I Am Spoonbender (GSL, MINT), a band I co-founded with a friend from
Michigan—but that is part of another story.
CIIS: The American Academy of Asian Studies was founded in San Francisco in 1950 by Stanford professor
of religion Frederick Spiegelberg (a friend of Carl Jung) and Alan Watts, an influential British East-West
philosopher, speaker, writer, and self-described “spiritual entertainer.” They wanted an Indian scholar on
faculty at this newly founded East-West graduate school, and wrote a letter to the highly regarded Indian
sage Sri Aurobindo for a recommendation. One of Aurobindo’s students, Haridas Chaudhuri, chair of a
philosophy department in Bengal, soon joined them in California. In 1974 they changed the name to the
California Institute of Asian Studies, and then in 1980 to the California Institute of Integral Studies. In 1981,
CIIS was accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges. It continues to draw more and
more students from around the globe.
Preface
v
7. What Is Integral Theory?
We live in a complex world that places an unprecedented combination of demands on us. In his 1994 book In Over Our Heads: The
Mental Demands of Modern Life, Harvard psychologist Robert Kegan summed up his research on this point. Kegan tells us that these
demands may “require a qualitative transformation in the complexity of mind every bit as fundamental as the transformation from magical
thinking to concrete thinking…or the transformation from concrete thinking to abstract thinking.” Just a few years after making this
statement, Kegan would become a major player in the emerging field of Integral psychology.
What are some of these demands on professional independent and electronic music producers in the 21st century? You need musical and
technical skills, of course, which means you need to know how to learn. People must know who you are and want to work with you, which
means you are part of social scenes and require professional social skills. How do you know that the styles you want to produce are
relevant? To answer that question, you need to be immersed in culture. You need to stay motivated and inspired, which means knowing
yourself and evolving as a person. To take care of your mind, you need to take care of your body. Add all of those together, seeing them as
simply different dimensions of the same thing, and you can start to get an idea of what integral means.
The word integral has two basic definitions:
w Necessary for wholeness or completeness
w That which integrates
The first notable appearances of the word “integral” in 20th century philosophy are found in the works of two intellectual giants: Sri
Aurobindo (India, 1872–1950) and Jean Gebser (Poland/Switzerland, 1905–1973). Building on the works of these two geniuses, Ken Wilber
(USA, 1949–) burst on the scene with the 1977 publication of his book The Spectrum of Consciousness, establishing himself as the premier
theorist in the field of transpersonal psychology. By the 1990s, he’d evolved beyond one field and into the most prolific thinker, teacher,
pandit, and writer on Integral theory. An expert meditator, needing just a few hours of sleep a night, and a true polymath, able to
effectively speed-read a few books a day, his knowledge is accurately described as encyclopedic.
Currently, Integral theory is primarily associated with Wilber. Although he was not the first Integral philosopher, he was the first to
develop a comprehensive theory that synthesized knowledge from almost every major field. Certainly, he has his detractors and critics, but
fans of his writing include massage therapists, psychoanalysts, rock stars like Billy Corgan and Serj Tankian, Hollywood notables like
Sharon Stone and the Wachowskis, and even Bill Clinton and Al Gore. In 1998, he founded Integral Institute with dozens of respected
experts and professionals from numerous fields: psychology (including Robert Kegan), business, politics, medicine, education, law and
criminal justice, art and music, ecology, and spirituality. On the front page of Integral Institute’s website (integralinstitute.org), they offer
the following definition.
Integral theory is an all-inclusive framework that draws on the key insights of the world’s greatest knowledge traditions. The awareness gained
from drawing on all truths and perspectives allows the Integral thinker to bring new depth, clarity and compassion to every level of human
endeavor—from unlocking individual potential to finding new approaches to global-scale problems.
Lofty goals, for sure. I don’t pretend for a second that this book is going to solve global problems in any direct way. But I am working
with the same intellectual framework, and I want you to know why. A serious study of Integral theory has numerous positive, practical
side-effects, such as sharpened critical-thinking skills, tools for addressing common logical fallacies, and enhanced clarity when wading
through ostensibly nebulous issues. I am not attempting to formally apply Integral theory as the central focus of this book. I only
emphasize a few aspects and some not at all. In fact, other than a few mentions here and there, unless you know what to look for you
will barely even notice Integral theory’s influence on this book. You do not need to focus your energy on learning it. If you are interested
in knowing more about Integral theory make sure to check out Appendix B, “Integral Theory Primer.”
While Integral theory is mostly supporting architecture, topics of chaos and complexity are plainly visible elements. We will soon talk
about tipping points, fractals, the butterfly effect, and other aspects of chaos and complexity. Integral theory is more expansive and
inclusive of perspectives and ways of knowing than chaos theory and complexity studies. As such, a serious study of Integral philosophy
ensures that a passion for science does not cause a devaluation of domains it does not adequately address, namely the world of subjective
and inter-subjective experience. So, now that we have a basic idea of what is meant by “integral,” let me tell you a story about a dragon
and a dragon slayer. And no, heavy-metal lyrics are not the inspiration here.
Chaos, Dragons, and Fractals?
I love chaos. It is beautiful, especially if you learn to perceive its ubiquitous patterns and rich nuances. Chaos is often conflated with
confusion or complication, or often solely to its pejorative connotation of destruction. Historically, you can trace our civilization’s
problematic relationship with chaos back to an ancient Babylonian myth (c. 1900 BCE). In this myth, the “hero” Marduk slays a dragon,
The Music Producer’s Survival Guide
vi
8. the ocean goddess Tiamat, and order rules over chaos—the second version of the myth, by the way. In the earlier version of the myth,
Tiamat was the peaceful creator of the cosmos, which is more in line with our current understanding of chaos as equally a creative process.
The post WWII computer revolution isn’t just responsible for the tech we use to produce music; the raw number-crunching power of
computers made it possible to discover the fundamental role that chaos has in shaping the physical universe. Chaos theory, fractal
geometry, cybernetics, systems theory, 3D computer-generated imagery, astronomy, and various schools of psychology and medicine are
just a few examples of fields rife with research and results saturated with chaos.
Deborah Tussey is a law professor at Oklahoma City University who specializes in intellectual property and copyright law. Her 2012
book Complex Copyright applies complexity concepts to a future vision of a more flexible and adaptive copyright law. A few years
earlier, in 2005, she published a paper on chaos and file sharing, called “Music at the Edge of Chaos: A Complex Systems Perspective on
File Sharing” and published in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, which included as succinct a summary of all key elements of
complexity theory as I could find. What follows is an academic quote that I think will help you understand precisely where I am
coming from:
A brief foray into the basic concepts of complexity theory is an obvious prerequisite to application of those concepts to the music system.
Complexity theory posits that complex adaptive systems universally possess certain characteristics: they are composed of multiple, interconnected
components; change cascades through them in a nonlinear manner; they evolve and coevolve over time in a pattern of punctuated equilibrium;
and they produce emergent behaviors. These qualities make system behavior unpredictable over the long term and, where humans intervene
in such systems, their actions are likely to produce unintended consequences. The most robust systems exhibit a property sometimes referred
to as self-organizing criticality or positioning at the ‘edge of chaos’—the ability to maintain a productive internal tension between order
and chaos.
So what does music production or being a music producer have to do with chaos and complexity? Chaos and complexity are fundamental
characteristics of the natural world, and we are part of that world, so they not only influence music, art, culture, technology, psychology,
and careers, but life in general. The more fluid and dynamic a given system, the higher the tendency toward turbulence, and the more
likely we will notice chaotic behavior. Artistic and entertainment industry careers are much more fluid than most fields, with various
flavors of instability being a common state of affairs. Why do some people’s careers take off, and other’s not? Why do new genres blow up,
when they blow up? Chaos and complexity also shed light on everything from the creative process to social scenes, the evolution of music
styles and genres, and dynamics in pop culture.
NOTE: Complexity studies is the broadest intellectual umbrella for the fields interested in the ideas mentioned in the preceding
quote. In popular language, chaos theory is synonymous with complexity studies, though it is just one of many approaches to
complexity. Technically speaking, chaos theory is a subset of dynamical systems theory, and is the mathematical study of non-
linear, unpredictable behavior of complex deterministic systems.
Moreover, the concept of complexification helps to explain many of the massive changes in our industry that make this book possible in
the first place. From a complex systems theory perspective, we are reaping benefits of the complexification process, which is illustrated via
numerous relevant examples throughout this book. For right now, let’s just work with Ervin Laszlo’s succinct explanation from his 1991
book, The Age of Bifurcation: Understanding the Changing World:
In sum, the processes of evolution create initially comparatively simple dynamical systems on particular levels of organization. The processes then
lead to the progressive complexification of the existing systems and, ultimately, to the creation of simpler systems on the next higher organizational
level, where complexification begins anew. Thus evolution moves from the simpler to the more complex, and from the lower to the higher level of
organization.
Throughout this book, to help explain certain concepts and relationships, I rely on various aspects of complexity studies, especially key
concepts from chaos theory such as unpredictable outcomes and fractal geometry. Regarding the latter, we are going to talk quite a bit
about branching structures and self-similarity in a number of the chapters. Sometimes I apply ideas and concepts in line with the
science as it is currently understood. At other times I take poetic license, using them as metaphor, analogy, muse, and/or inspiration.
In either case, I do not get into the mathematics underlying the science. In addition to sidebars mixed in with the chapters, the
aptly named Appendix A, “Chaos Theory and Complexity Studies Primer,” serves as a primer on chaos theory and complexity
studies.
One of this book’s meta-goals is to formally introduce these ideas into our field. They are already utilized in psychology, sociology, biology,
education, and numerous other academic fields, but also video game development, digital visual arts, and other fine arts. Many of today’s
scientific givens, which are regularly discussed in audio engineering and the more technical aspects of music production, were once deemed
too “off topic” in the context of music (for example, the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem). Some of you may find it odd that I am
Preface
vii
9. putting so much time and energy into integrating chaos and complexity ideas into the world of independent and electronic music
production. Just as talking about computer networks and IP addresses would have been fringe topics in music production curricula back in
the 1980s, talking about music production, chaos, and complexity one day will seem like a no brainer.
Down the Rabbit Hole
I know for a fact that some of you will really appreciate and enjoy the science and philosophy contextualizations in this book. But, if you
are concerned that this book might be too intellectual or academic for your taste, don’t fret. Although I do not hold back when I think
there is something worthy of deeper consideration, I guarantee that you will also find a lot of perfectly straightforward, practical,
immediately useful information. It took years to digest the fundamentals of chaos theory, complexity studies, and Integral theory, and new
layers of understanding continually dawn on me. You do not need to know all of this stuff for The Music Producer’s Survival Guide to be
useful. If you do decide to take a deeper look into the ideas presented here, you may just find an endless source of inspiration and
intellectual stimulation, as I have. If not, no worries. This book is designed in such a way that there are levels of understanding to take
away from it, so there is something in here for everyone.
To sum up the intuitive foundations of my thinking better than any words can convey, this preface concludes with pretty photos of self-
similar, fractal shapes found at all levels of the physical world. (See Figures P.1–P.6.)
NOTE: For full-color versions of the images in this book, be sure to visit this book’s companion website, www.iempsg.com.
Figure P.1 NASA-generated simulation of 13 million3
light-year sliver of our universe. The texture is created by the
“filaments,” which represent dark matter in the space between galaxies.
Source: Public domain via NASA.gov.
The Music Producer’s Survival Guide
viii
10. Figure P.2 A satellite photo of the Lena river delta in Siberia, with fractal structures similar to a sponge, cardiovascular
system, or “filaments” as seen in Figure P.1.
Source: Public domain via NASA.gov.
Figure P.3 Lichtenberg figure in plexiglass caused by high-voltage current. Created and photographed by Bert Hickman
of Stoneridge Engineering (capturedlightning.com).
Source: Public domain via Bert Hickman.
Preface
ix
11. Figure P.4 A satellite photo of the Yukon river delta in Alaska. Notice the coastline’s and mountain ranges’ fractal branching
structures.
Source: Public domain via NASA.gov.
Figure P.5 A Hubble satellite photo of the M13 Galaxy nucleus. (Photo by NASA/STScI.)
Source: Public domain via NASA.gov.
The Music Producer’s Survival Guide
x
12. Figure P.6 Screenshot of internet-map.net depicting a map of the Internet in 2011. Each dot represents a website, and the
overall image displays self-similarity.
Source: internet-map.net.
Preface
xi
13. Acknowledgments
The Music Producer’s Survival Guide: Chaos, Creativity, and Career in Independent and Electronic Music represents a culmination of
experiences and knowledge from the past 25 years or so. This brain dump was a group effort, so there are a lot of people that I need to
thank for making it possible. There is one group that must be thanked above all others: my students. They say that the best way to learn is
to teach, and I couldn’t agree more. If not for students asking me questions, this book would not exist.
A big, heartfelt thank you also goes out to all of the following: Orren Merton, my acquisitions editor, for believing in this project and
making it happen. Michael White, the technical editor most uniquely qualified for this book, not only for his technical knowledge and
decades of industry experience, but also his knowledge and wisdom on many of the other topics found herein. Kate Shoup, my project
editor, for her editing chops and helping me make sense. Alexandra Ricciardi, for putting up with my barrage of fair use and public
domain questions. Mark Hughes, for promoting this book. Mark Garvey, for originally bringing me into the Cengage Learning universe
back in the day, and for crafting the cover copy and Web copy.
Thanks also go to: David Zeitler, for his expertise on all things Integral theory. Jean-Luc Cohen, Daniel Gould, and Chris Buono, for
additional help or feedback on a few key topics. Arnold Steiner, for the awesome cover art. The wonderful strangers from around the globe
who answered “yes” to my out-of-the-blue requests to use their math, science, synth, Integral, or history images gratis: Shevy Shovlin
(Vintage King LA), Brad Berry (Perfect Circuit Audio), Paul Bourke (paulbourke.net), Bert Hickman (capturedlightning.com), Chris
Skirrow (Lindos Electronics), Ruslan Enikeev (internet-map.net), David Giovannoni (firstsounds.org), Steve Self (formlessmountain.com),
Georg-Johann Lay, and Lutz Pietschke.
Any factual, intellectual, or philosophical mistakes in this book are mine, and not the fault of anyone else.
Thanks to Hank Shocklee for the amazing interview found in Appendix C, and to everyone who honored me with an interview (originally
intended for this book but now to be found in a forthcoming companion book): Chris Baio, Laura Escudé, Jason Drummond, John Jansen,
Shawn Hatfield, and Erik Magrini. Thanks also to Adelaide Matthews for saving my wrists by transcribing all four hours of those
interviews. Thanks, too, to Dennis DeSantis, Dave Hillel, Huston Singletary, Tony McCall, and everyone at Ableton; Dave Hill; Joe
DeStefano (IK Multimedia); James Coker (Five12); Przemek Gocyla and Sebastian Bachlinski (D16 Group); Stefano Daino (i3 S.R.L); Jo-
Ann Nina; Jason Koons (Sweetwater); and Bob Power.
Thanks to the Jackson, Meyer, and Greenwald families.
Thanks to Phoenix Perry, Margaret Schedel, David Last, and everyone else at Devotion Gallery.
Thanks to Tony Grund, Dion Roy, Jon Margulies, Jon Mack, Dave Greenberg, Todd Sines, Michael Doyle, Bethany Shorb, Adriano
Clemente, Ellen Pearlman, A.J. Tissian, Mark Ephraim, Eric Hoegemeyer, Jesse Smith, Dave Tate, Dan Storchan, Phil Eichhorn, James
Hayes, Lee Marvin, Cleve Pozar, Ronnie Shingelo, Richard Luchese, Bill Appel, Adam Silk, Mike Swartzstein, James Marvel, Naut Humon,
Jennifer Jass, Lenny Gonzalez, Anna Sitko, Tom Rollison, J.C., David Rishel, Paul Grove, Smelly Mustafa, Benjamin Chance, 550 Ashbury
St. (1998–2002) and 516 McCourtie St. (1992–1994). Richard Termini, Karl Wenninger, Jeff Humphrey, Michael Marcucci, and everyone
else at DMX NYC. Stacey Van Buskirk, Robert Daniels, Dave Walker, Dimitri Vandellos, and everyone else from the Bryant Street days at
Rocket Network. Sean Kelly, Alfonso Montuori, Richard Tarnas, Steven Goodman, Carol Whitfield, and numerous other professors and
peers at CIIS, including all my NYCIIS alumni peeps.
Finally, thanks to anyone else who deserved to be mentioned but was somehow left out.
xii
14. About the Author
Brian Jackson is a musician, audio engineer, music producer, teacher, and philosopher. He is co-owner and director of education at
Devotion, an art gallery and community space in Brooklyn that also serves as his Ableton Certified Training Center. Brian’s involvement in
DIY, independent, and underground music culture started in Detroit more than two decades ago. He has produced various styles of
electronic music, played bass in bands, promoted club events, attempted a record label, and DJed after-hours parties. From award-winning
experimental video to TV shows such as 24, his sounds have been heard worldwide. He uses the pseudonyms Infinite Volume and
Cyphony for solo works and remixes, was half of the conceptual retro-future electro synth A/V duo Memory Systems, and co-founded the
genre-bending band I Am Spoonbender (1996–2000). He is the author of multiple tutorial DVDs on Ableton Live and technical editor of
books on Live and Pro Tools, among others. Brian is also a creative-technical consultant with clients including Ableton, Access, and
multiple Grammy nominees/winners. With a B.S. in Sociology and Philosophy already under his belt (WMU, 1994), Brian went on to earn
an M.A. in East-West Psychology (1999) from the California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco. He lives in Brooklyn, NY, and
is reachable through his website, www.formlabsnyc.com.
xiii
21. Introduction
As technology advances, it reverses the characteristics of every situation again and again. The age of automation is going to be the age of “do
it yourself.”
–Marshall McLuhan, 1957
The technology at the leading edge changes so rapidly that you have to keep current after you get out of school. I think probably the most
important thing is having good fundamentals.
–Gordon Moore (co-founder of Intel)
None of us ever got into it to strike it rich, let’s put it that way. I think anybody who wants to start a band…specifically to make money…it’s
kind of a fool’s dream in a way.
–Thurston Moore, Sonic Youth (Innovators in Music, 2010)
I could use the industry to try and further my own career or get records signed to major record labels but that’s not what I’m about….I’m just
so happy to be traveling around with my friends and to play records for people in clubs….It’s not about success or money for me, it’s about
shared experiences.
–Ellen Allien (owner, BPitch Control)
DIY.Independent.Electronic.Music.Producer.
Like most of you reading this book I started out as a music fan and musician. Production and audio engineering came later, initially as a
way to help better express musical ideas without having to depend on costly recording studios and later as a way to help pay the bills. I
love computers, production, and audio engineering, but first and foremost I am a music fan. Although we all have our favorite styles and
genres, I can appreciate something about most any one of them. If an artist truly has something to express, it doesn’t matter if the music is
released on a major label, an imprint, a boutique indie, self released, or simply just performed live. The music can be techno, electro,
house, rock, metal, punk, jazz, hip hop, pop, bluegrass, Afrobeat, funk, gospel, classical, experimental, or unclassifiable. It can be from
Detroit, Berlin, London, Morocco, Ghana, Iran, Israel, Tibet, China, India, Brazil, Mexico, or parts unknown. Having said all that, this is
not a music-appreciation book, per se. Rather, it is about music production—independent and electronic music production. Moreover, it is
as much about being an independent/electronic music producer in the 21st century, and being able to do it yourself, being DIY, as it is
about music production.
If I had started writing this book in 1992 and not 2012, the main title would simply be the Electronic Music Producer’s Survival Guide.
Back then, electronic musicians were the only ones you would find toiling away for hours by themselves making music with computers,
synths, samplers, and sequencers. The Internet’s role in the spread of information and connecting the like-minded from anywhere, at any
time, cannot be understated. So this book talks about the computer revolution and the resulting home-studio boom. How they have
inexorably changed the game for everyone, given that making high-quality music at home using computers is no longer just the domain of
arty rock stars and electronic music producers. We’ll deal with the implications of powerful, sophisticated, affordable (and even free)
software putting once-expensive, state-of-the-art capabilities from just a few decades past in the hands of anyone looking for it.
What Is the Goal of This Book?
The Music Producer’s Survival Guide is no slacker. It is ambitious and has a lot of goals. It wants to help you become smarter and wiser. It
wants to help those who are committed to their craft rise above the distracting, incessant, low-level noise generated by marketers, shills,
haters, posers, followers, clowns, oafs, trolls, and parasites. It aims to give you tools that you will need to survive, and better yet, to have a
fulfilling career as an independent and/or electronic music producer in the 21st century.
xx
22. We live in the Information Age. There is a vast amount of information readily available to you about most all aspects of music and
production. Largely absent is readily available knowledge about how all this information fits together. Even more rare is readily available
knowledge about how all these aspects connect to other areas of life and career that are equally important for survival and success. As a
teacher, I am motivated to share information and knowledge. So in many ways, this book aims to fill in many of the gaps that an aspiring
producer would learn only from many years of experience or a few less years of mentoring from established professionals. I do not claim
expertise in every area discussed in this book, and I regularly seek out knowledge from others, but I have more than enough expertise and
competence across the board to help you perform a metaphorical decryption of cipher text into plain text.
Rapid advancements in technology are changing most every aspect of our lives, not just audio and music. For music producers, the narrow
context is music technology’s piggyback ride on the exponential ascent of the communication, computing, and information revolutions
instigated by Alexander Graham Bell, Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison, Claude Shannon, and Alan Turing. Given the complexity of the
modern world, and our field in particular, there is a need for clarity. Not only is our industry evolving and changing at a very rapid pace,
but it is also exposing us to knowledge once privy only to specializations and crafts unto themselves. How do various aspects of music
production relate to each other and what does it mean for somebody trying to do it all himself or herself? For example, there are few
aspiring young producers who understand the differences and relationships between composing, sound design, mixing, mastering, audio
technology, creative process, and technical skill.
I want to get you thinking—about the big picture and about very specific topics. At the same time, there are a lot of questions that
everyone needs to ask themselves—in other words, contemplations. I am not so deluded as to think that I have all the answers, or that I
even know all the questions, but I know a lot of the questions that every aspiring technical creative professional should ask himself or
herself. As a philosophical survival guide, this book puts the onus on you to pave your own road.
As a philosophical survival guide, this book is also very practical. I want you to have immediate takeaways, and each chapter provides these
in its own way. Here are a few examples of topics that feature tips and pointers:
w Planning your career
w Learning your craft
w Networking and navigating social scenes
w Organizing your sessions for maximum productivity and creativity
w Dealing with creative blocks
w Making decisions about equipment
w Avoiding common lifestyle pitfalls
w Protecting your hearing
w Staying healthy
How Is This Book Structured?
If this book were an analog synthesizer, you could say it is semi-modular. Each chapter provides different functionality to the system and
its user. Each chapter also offers guidance regarding key components of a music producer’s survival. Various themes are woven
throughout, and I do refer to other chapters’ topics here and there, but each one can stand on its own. I certainly didn’t write this book in
order, so a non-linear read seems as logical as not. Read it straight through, or jump around to make it suit your needs.
Each chapter includes a combination of loosely definable section types: quotes, context, theory, contemplations, definitions, practical topics,
and anecdotal items. There is no set order for these sections, but I always start out with a few quotes. Usually what follows is prose about
the big picture to provide context before moving on to theory or topics designed to provoke contemplation about your specific needs and
situation. When I say big picture, I mean it, and I know a lot of you are going to appreciate these sections. But, I realize a broad context
may not be useful for some beginners or those who are already feeling a bit lost or overwhelmed by the sheer amount of options and
information. (If you suddenly wake up on the corner of Broadway and Astor Place on a rainy day, having never been to NYC, and you ask
someone where you are, being told that you are toward the outskirts of the Milky Way galaxy is not very helpful.) Every chapter also
includes useful definitions and/or highly practical sections to make sure there is something to immediately apply. To illustrate key points
or to ground seemingly abstract ideas, I often use personal anecdotes, so you can learn from my experience and mistakes or simply avoid
reinventing the wheel.
Depending on your personal entry point to the subject matter or your mood that day, you may be more or less interested in different
sections or chapters. While moving through different chapters out of order will work for some of you, I do recommend approaching most
of the chapters in a more linear fashion—at least on the first read. Whether you go from start to finish or take a more circuitous route, as
you circle back through material, previously read sections will take on new meaning and eventually you will put it all together in a way
that makes sense to you.
Introduction
xxi
23. Toward the back of the book you will find three appendixes. Appendix A, “Chaos Theory and Complexity Studies Primer,” is additional
background on complexity studies and chaos theory. Appendix B, “Integral Theory Primer,” offers additional background on Integral
theory. Appendix C is an interview with legendary music producer Hank Shocklee.
NOTE: Look for the companion book to The Music Producer’s Survival Guide, which features interviews with a variety of music
professionals.
What This Book Is Not
The Music Producer’s Survival Guide is not trying to be trendy. It is not overly concerned with what is currently hot. It is not going to
show you a bunch of screenshots of this year’s latest software. Therefore, it is not going to slowly leak relevance with each new update and
GUI overhaul or with the rise and fall of genres, styles, or artists. A survival guide must have a decent shelf life.
This book is not an in-depth technical manual. It does not shy away from technical discussion when it is relevant, but it does not attempt
to give you technical training. You will find out about what you should learn, tips on how to learn it, and suggested directions on where to
learn it.
This is not another “how to make it in the music industry” book. What you may learn here can help you to meet your goals, whatever
they may be. I do want you to make a living doing what you love, but the goal of this book is not to help you get rich and famous
(although it is a guide that may help you reach those goals should a fulfilling career require them). That said, I hope you find fame and
fortune so you can drop my name in interviews and hire me to hang out in your entourage. (You never know. You may just need
someone who can explain the differences between dither and aliasing and between minimal techno from Detroit or San Francisco at your
next private after-hours party.)
Whom Is This Book For?
This book is custom-tailored for people interested in the intersection of music, sound, audio, technology, creativity, culture, science,
philosophy, and consciousness. You may even notice that many of the concepts are also relevant to other creative-technical trades and
professions. There is something in here for almost anyone interested in the topics named on the cover, but I expect it will be most
appreciated by five loosely defined groups:
w If you are an aspiring young producer or musician and just getting started in music production or have yet to pursue a career
path, this book is for you.
w If you are an experienced DJ or serious hobbyist with some production experience and want to make a go at it, this book is
for you.
w If you are a student or teacher at a college or school with a music-production or audio-technology curriculum, then this book is
perfect for you.
w If you are a professional and/or are established in one of the four major aspects of music production (music, sound design, audio
engineering, or tools; see Figure 4.1 in Chapter 4, “Master Your Craft”) and are looking to expand your creative and career
options, there is a lot in this book for you. (Although, it is equally likely I have a lot to learn from you in your area of
specialization.)
w If you have a home studio, are a hobbyist, are a serious music fan with interest in technology, or are someone who is simply
trying to make sense of all of the options available for working on music in the computer-centric world, there is something in this
book for you.
Can I Get a Venn Diagram?
The terms DIY, independent, indie, and electronic music are defined and briefly discussed right after Figure I.1. First, this diagram is not
to scale in any way, and only attempts to clarify the focus of the book in your hands, not all possible relationships. We are concerned with
the circles labeled “indie music” and “electronic music,” primarily where they overlap. In total, there are seven circles: one huge, one large,
three medium, and two small. The huge one that encircles the other six represents music in general, which has been around for a very long
time—at least 42,000 years (but possibly millions). The large circle on the right represents music business, which includes all the aspects of
The Music Producer’s Survival Guide
xxii
25. successful, commercial viability is not normally the primary motivation. The modern indie label mold is most associated with the DIY
punk counter culture movements of the late 1970s/early 1980s, the electronic music and adventurous/experimental labels of that same
period and into the early 1990s, and later labels following in the footsteps of the aforementioned. (More discussion on this topic is in
Chapter 1, “Musica Universalis.”
How is indie different from DIY? If you are DIY you are in all probability indie, but not necessarily the other way around. For example,
there are artists on indie labels who play on the smaller-venue music circuits, but essentially use smaller, cheaper, less-commercial versions
of the traditional project workflows, production processes, and commerce infrastructures. They are indie, but not very DIY. Also, indie
labels are often stepping stones for artists hoping to sign with a major label, so they are indie only by definition and DIY only by necessity,
not philosophy, until they get signed (if they get signed, and it works out). There is nothing necessarily wrong with this fact; it is what it is.
Electronic Music (EM)
Electronic music is not easy to precisely define, but it is safe to say that it is music primarily created with electronic instruments such as
synths, samplers, drum machines, and sequencers. Electronic music production (EMP) is easiest to DIY from a logistical point of view
because it can literally just be you and your computer. Yes, there is mainstream, major-label, electronic pop and dance music, but the vast
majority of electronic music is aptly part of the DIY and independent music world.
Chapter 1, “Musica Universalis,” and Chapter 7, “Creative Process,” discuss historical relationships and evolutions of various genres. Here I
offer a super short history of EM for context, but know that most of the following is further covered throughout the book. Although
electronic instruments first appeared in the 1870s, electronic music didn’t really get going until the 1950s with pioneering academics such
as Karlheinz Stockhausen and Max Matthews. Then, in the 1960s, with the synthesizers of Don Buchla and Robert Moog in particular,
various composers and experimental musicians fertilized the ground for the major-label, progressive rock artists of the early 70s along with
the German Krautrock movement that birthed Kraftwerk. By the late 1970s, the U.K./U.S. led new wave and proto-industrial music’s
paralleling of synth pop, Zapp and Roger’s electro funk, and Giorgio Moroder’s chart-topping Italo-disco productions solidified electronic
music in the pop and club worlds. Jamaican Dub and Roland’s legendary x0x series of drum machines and synths were the final
ingredients needed for the largely African-American innovations of house, techno, electro, and hip hop that spawned most of the countless
genres thought of as EM today.
NOTE: From a production point of view, hip hop is for all intents and purposes electronic music (as it is a close relative of
electro, or “break-dance music”). The exact same technology is used to make beats or produce tracks. If this doesn’t make sense
to you, just listen to “Planet Rock” (1982) by Afrika Bambaataa or “Jam On It” (1983) by Newcleus. The record industry
separates hip hop and other “urban” styles from the rest of electronic music for marketing and distribution purposes.
Mainstream hip hop and other styles of electronic music do inhabit different cultural niches, so this separation is understandable.
A Few Words on Major Labels and the Corporate
Media Business
NOTE: While reading this section, keep in mind that “independent” is in this book’s title for a reason. Accordingly, it is written
from the perspective that, not only can you have a fulfilling and successful career without the major labels and/or corporate
media companies, but that moreover, such a career is a commendable goal unto itself.
There are numerous obvious cases of creative and artistic successes by popular major-label artists, yet it is important we never forget that
the commercial music business is first and foremost profit driven. In most industries, competition between companies is good for
consumers, while monopolies are not good for the public because they can fix prices, offer limited products, and control access to
opportunities. In 1998, there were six major label groups—“The Big 6”—which included Dutch, German, British, American, Canadian,
and Japanese financial interests. As of 2012, there was only “The Big 3”: Universal Music Group (35+ labels), Sony Music Entertainment
(10+ labels), and Warner Music Group (20+ labels). All of these are subsidiaries of larger corporations. Combined with the predatory
domination of various media by Clear Channel (discussed next), these four entities basically control the large-scale, commercial music
industry (and much more).
Clear Channel in particular is quite problematic. For starters, its Live Nation Entertainment subsidiary includes a 2010 merger with
Ticketmaster, who already had a famously troubled relationship with musicians and fans alike due to its fees and control over access to
The Music Producer’s Survival Guide
xxiv
26. venues. Clear Channel also has major interests in TV (including news), talk radio, outdoor advertising (billboards), and performance
venues. In fact, Clear Channel owns more than 99 percent of the top 250 broadcast radio markets. In 2008, its primary shareholder, Bain
Capital, took it from a publicly traded company to a privately owned subsidiary of CC Media Holdings, Inc. In addition to other
industries, Bain also has significant financial holdings in Guitar Center, AMC Cinemas, Warner Music Group, and D&M Holdings, a
merger of Japanese companies Denon and Marantz, which also now owns U.K.-based Allen & Heath. (Yes, Bain is the same private-equity
company founded by the losing 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.)
Clear Channel will do anything they can, threaten me, go to my clients directly, anything to get control of the markets. And once they’ve got that
control they can do whatever they want, including raise the rates. They’re a clear example of what can happen with deregulation. They’ve ruined
radio, as far as I’m concerned. And now they’re licking their chops to be able to control more of what the public sees and hears.”
–Anonymous owner of a southeastern advertising agency (in Eric Boehlert’s
2003 article “Clear Channel’s Big, Stinking Deregulation Mess” on Salon.com)
Universal Music Group, until recently part of France’s Vivendi Universal Entertainment, was sold to GE (80 percent in 2004 and the other
20 percent in 2011), owner of NBC, to form NBC Universal with Comcast in 2011. As of February 2013, Comcast bought GE’s remaining
shares to become full owner of NBC Universal. Comcast is a huge company and, as the largest cable operator in the U.S., also has
significant control over Internet access.
So, when we talk about the commercial music business, we are referring to an industry controlled mainly by just four entities in only two
countries (as of February 2013): Comcast (U.S.), Time Warner Inc. (U.S.), Bain Capital (U.S.), and Sony Corporation of America
(U.S./Japan). Media corporations have a lot of vested interests, including those of their parent companies. To support their financial,
political, and/or ideological goals, they make decisions on what to say, print, and release, and what to omit. (To be fair, most corporations
do not have political and ideological goals, and therefore primarily make decisions based on revenue and their mission statement.) As a
generalization, we can say that misinformation and censorship are the most pressing concerns about mainstream, corporate-owned media’s
control of information flow.
A famous middle-aged rock-and-roller called me last week to thank me for speaking out against the war, only to go on to tell me that he could
not speak himself because he fears repercussions from Clear Channel. “They promote our concert appearances,” he said. “They own most of the
stations that play our music. I can’t come out against this war.”
–Tim Robbins, actor (in Eric Boehlert’s 2003 article “Habla usted Clear Channel?” on Salon.com)
Everyone has a point of view, so all media has a bias of some sort, but I think the most problematic forms manifest in specific ways: with
mainstream right-leaning media, it is what they do say (profit interest misinformation) and don’t allow (ideology and morality censorship),
while with mainstream left-leaning media it is what they don’t say (corporate interest censorship). There are significant implications for
bands, artists, and music producers. Who controls what you can sell, where you can sell it, what you can say, how you can say it, where
you can play, and how you are heard? In other words, who controls your freedom of expression and ability to make a living doing it?
These are not new issues or questions. In fact, these issues are precisely why DIY and independent exist in the first place. Moreover, there
are more opportunities than ever for self motivated DIY and independent artists and producers.
NOTE: Chapter 2 discusses the evolution of the record industry and the huge changes that have transpired in the last decade due
to the digital revolution.
Let me be very clear. For a few people, major labels are a good choice. When you have a substantial following and have outgrown the
capacities of smaller labels, then considering working with a major label can make sense—should it be an option and the deal is right. Just
remember that although the A&R person who signs you may be your friend, to their boss, you are just numbers on a spreadsheet, profit or
loss, nothing more, nothing less. If your buddy in A&R is let go, you likely depart with him or her. It happens all of the time. If “getting
signed” is your goal, just make sure to do your research and get a really good music-business lawyer. (Check with your local musician’s
union for a referral.) That said, you should have a good lawyer for any deals, and don’t assume that independent labels won’t screw you
over just because they are “indie.”
Music business is not covered in this book because there is a lot of material out there already and it is not my area of expertise. But I have
four pieces of hard-learned advice that are important when dealing with strangers, acquaintances, and even friends:
w Get financial agreements sorted out before any money is involved.
w Put agreements in writing.
w Do your research. Don’t make decisions based on assumptions.
w If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Introduction
xxv
27. Magic Might Make Machine Mechanism, Moegen Macht
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
–Arthur C. Clarke
Whether before or after one chooses and commits oneself to a life of intellectual, technical, and/or artistic
pursuit, there comes a time to recognize a lineage. Who and what carved the pathways that created this
option for you and your peers? Although the most immediate and obvious forerunners are important to
recognize, beyond that, the breadth and scope of this lineage can vary greatly from person to person and
career to career. A musician may simply see himself or herself as following in the footsteps of the modern
greats in his or her genre, while another might understand that he or she is also part of a broader artistic
movement that also includes the writers, filmmakers, dancers, and painters of his or her day. Other
musicians will further see themselves as participants in long arcs of intellectual traditions that include not
only the arts, but also whole cultural movements including technology, science, politics, religion, and social
change. It is not unreasonable to even include streams of thought or traditions dating back hundreds or
thousands of years, such as shamanism, the philosophers of ancient Greece, or the artists of the Italian
Renaissance.
We are committed to producing music using modern electronic and computer technology, so what is our
lineage? There is no right answer, and I am not going to offer one. I’m sure you can figure out the music
part for yourself, but for the big context, I offer the following paragraphs for your consideration.
A brief scan of various dictionaries tells us that the verb produce means to make, to create, to bring forth, to
bring into being, to give form or shape to, to oversee the making of. The word technology stems from the
Indo-European root, tek, which means to shape or to make, and the later Greek tekhne, which refers to arts,
skill, craft, methods, or techniques, combined with -logy, meaning the study of or language of. Jean Gebser
(1949) pointed out that all the terms in this section’s heading stem from the same Indo-European root,
magh. In German, moegen means to want. Macht means power, as in might or willpower (though not
unrelated to energy, as in a power station or ein kraftwerk).
The tree-like branchings that stem from the primal root words magh and tek point to an archetypal
constellation that permeates our craft. Christopher Nolan’s film The Prestige (2006) brilliantly re-imagines
the late 19th century’s crossfade from mechanical trickery to electrified technological wizardry via the bitter
adversarial competition between two popular magicians: one driven by want, the other by will. David Bowie
makes an appearance as Nikola Tesla, who is regularly referenced as a wizard or magician. Thomas Edison,
inventor of the phonograph (1877), was known as the “wizard of Menlo Park,” and released a silent film
called The Magician in 1900. Magicians present a variety of illusions, with the most common known as a
production—wherein they produce something from nothing, such as a rabbit from a hat.
Welcome to the Future
We truly are living in amazing times. I’m not exaggerating when I say that you have more freedoms and opportunities than any creative
person living at any time in human history. It is unquestionable that technology is largely responsible for this state of affairs. But as with
all technological progress, there are also new challenges. Just because you have more opportunities does not mean they are easy to grasp
because anybody can readily choose to compete for those same opportunities. The Internet and the democratization of computing
technology enables everyone to have their own media outlet. Even if you’ve never explicitly thought about the DIY ethos, these challenges
include implicit responsibilities and demands on each of us to do more for ourselves. Whether you produce house, techno, hip hop,
dubstep, indietronica, or even independent movie soundtracks, we are all in the same boat. Those who refuse to accept the new
technologies are being left behind. Those who are too dazzled by all of their possibilities and wonder are ultimately distracted.
Frank Sinatra sang on over 1,000 recorded songs, but is credited as a composer on fewer than 10 of them. Have you heard of Motown?
What about the Funk Brothers? The Funk Brothers were the in-house session musicians who played on all the classic Motown recordings
from 1959–1972. Even if you are not a fan of that era’s music, every producer should see the 2002 documentary Standing in the Shadows
of Motown. It was not that long ago that recorded music was a process accomplished only by a whole team of specialists. First, there was
The Music Producer’s Survival Guide
xxvi