4. Credentialing
Credentialing is the process
of verifying and assessing the
qualifications and
competencies of individuals
in a specific profession or
field.
DEFINITION EXAMPLES
Some examples of
credentialing programs
include medical board
certification, professional
licensure, and
industry-specific
certifications.
6. Key Aspects of Credentialing in Quality Assurance
Verification of
Qualifications
Certifications
and Licenses
Experience
and Expertise
References and
Recommendations
Continuing
Education
Adherence
to Industry
Standards
Background
Checks
Documentation
10. Licensure
Licensure is the legal
permission granted by a
governing body or authority
to practice a certain
profession or occupation.
DEFINITION
Licensing is the formal
granting of permission to (a)
operate a new institution (b)
a new programme of study
(c) practice a profession (d)
use an educational product
(paper or online) or
computer application.
11. Key Aspects of Licensure in Quality Assurance
1. Regulatory Compliance:
• In certain industries, particularly those that
are highly regulated for safety or public
health reasons (such as healthcare,
pharmaceuticals, and food production),
licensure may be mandated by government
agencies.
12. Key Aspects of Licensure in Quality Assurance
2. Industry-Specific Credentials:
• Quality assurance professionals in various
industries often pursue industry-specific
certifications or licenses to demonstrate their
competence.
• These credentials may be recognized and
required within their respective fields.
13. Key Aspects of Licensure in Quality Assurance
3. Validation of Competence
• Licensure typically requires candidates to
demonstrate their competence through
examinations, practical assessments, and
other means.
• This process ensures that those with licenses
have the necessary knowledge and skills to
perform their quality assurance roles
effectively.
14. Key Aspects of Licensure in Quality Assurance
4. Continuing Education:
• Many licensure requirements include ongoing
education and professional development as a
condition of maintaining the license.
• This helps ensure that professionals stay up-
to-date with industry standards and best
practices.
15. Key Aspects of Licensure in Quality Assurance
5. Scope of Licensure:
• The scope of licensure can vary. Some quality
assurance professionals may be licensed to
perform specific tasks or functions, while
others may be licensed to oversee quality
assurance processes for an entire
organization.
16. Key Aspects of Licensure in Quality Assurance
6. Consumer and Public Confidence:
• Licensure can enhance consumer and public
confidence in the quality of products or
services provided by organizations or
professionals. It provides assurance that there
is a regulatory framework in place to oversee
and maintain quality standards.
17. Key Aspects of Licensure in Quality Assurance
7. Legal Consequences:
• Operating without the required licensure in
regulated industries can have legal
consequences, including fines, legal action, or
the suspension of operations.
18. Advantages of Licensure in Quality Assurance
1. High Standards:
• Licensure typically sets high standards for
education, training, and experience. This
helps maintain a high level of competence
and expertise among quality assurance
professionals, which, in turn, contributes to
better quality control.
19. Advantages of Licensure in Quality Assurance
2. Enhanced Credibility:
• Licensure adds credibility to an individual or
organization's reputation. It demonstrates a
commitment to quality, adherence to
industry standards, and a dedication to best
practices.
20. Advantages of Licensure in Quality Assurance
3. Improved Quality Control:
• Licensure encourages quality assurance
professionals to follow standardized, effective
processes and methodologies, which
ultimately leads to more efficient quality
control and problem-solving.
21. Advantages of Licensure in Quality Assurance
4. Reduced Risk and Liability:
• Licensure helps mitigate risks and reduce
potential liabilities. When professionals meet
the requirements for licensure, they are
more likely to identify and address quality
issues early in the production process,
minimizing the risk of defects, recalls, or
safety concerns.
22. Advantages of Licensure in Quality Assurance
5. Competitive Advantage:
• Licensure can provide a competitive
advantage for both individuals and
organizations. It demonstrates a
commitment to quality, which can set them
apart in the marketplace.
23. Advantages of Licensure in Quality Assurance
6. Ethical Accountability:
• Licensure often includes adherence to a code
of ethics, ensuring that quality assurance
professionals act with integrity and
transparency in their roles.
25. Accreditation
Accreditation is a process by which an external organization assesses
and recognizes the quality and performance of an institution,
program, or service provider.
● Accreditation is both a status and a process.
DEFINITION
26. Importance of Accreditation to Education
• Helps advance standards and promote excellence,
• Provides means for ongoing self-assessment and
continuous improvement,
• Enhances reputation and creates public accountability,
• Supports the obtainment of financial aid and support
and the establishment of international cooperation,
• Helps students determine acceptable institutions to
pursue their education,
• Assists institutions in determining the acceptability of
transfer credits,
• Helps employers determine the validity of programs of
study and whether a graduate is qualified.
27. Four Accreditation Process
1. Self-Assessment and
Preparatory Phase
2. Application and
Submission Phase
3. On-Site Evaluation and
Assessment Phase
4. Accreditation Decision and
Ongoing Monitoring Phase
28. Four Main Process in Accreditation
1. Self-Assessment and
Preparatory Phase
A. Internal Evaluation: The institution or organization seeking
accreditation begins by conducting an internal evaluation of its
programs, services, and operations.
B. Gather Documentation: The organization collects and assembles
all the necessary documentation, evidence, and data to support its
accreditation application.
C. Develop a Self-Study Report: In many accreditation processes,
the organization prepares a self-study report. This report outlines
the institution's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement
based on the evaluation.
29. Four Main Process in Accreditation
A. Application Submission: The organization formally submits its
application for accreditation to the accrediting body. This
application typically includes the self-study report and all required
documentation.
B. Initial Review: The accrediting body reviews the application and
documentation to ensure completeness and compliance with their
standards and requirements.
2. Application and
Submission Phase
30. Four Main Process in Accreditation
A. Site Visit: The accrediting body conducts an on-site visit to the
organization. During the visit, a team of evaluators, often experts in
the field, assess various aspects of the organization, such as
facilities, processes, and interviews with staff, students, or clients.
B. Evaluation and Assessment: The evaluators assess the
organization's compliance with accreditation standards and identify
areas for improvement. They prepare a report detailing their
findings and may make recommendations for further action.
3. On-Site Evaluation and
Assessment Phase
31. Four Main Process in Accreditation
A. Accreditation Decision: Based on the self-study report, on-site evaluation, and the
evaluator's report, the accrediting body makes a decision regarding accreditation.
This decision can result in full accreditation, provisional accreditation, denial, or the
need for additional action, such as addressing specific deficiencies.
B. Ongoing Monitoring: Accredited organizations are typically subject to ongoing
monitoring and periodic re-evaluation to ensure they continue to meet accreditation
standards. This may involve annual reports, additional site visits, and compliance
checks.
C. Continuous Improvement: Organizations are expected to use the accreditation
process as a means of continuous improvement. They should address any identified
deficiencies, implement best practices, and strive to enhance their quality, safety, and
effectiveness over time.
4. Accreditation Decision and
Ongoing Monitoring Phase
32. Accrediting Agencies for Private Sector
Accrediting Agencies Year Established
Philippine Accrediting Association of
School, Colleges and Universities
(PAASCU)
1957
Philippine Association of Colleges
and Universities- Commission on
Accreditation (PACU- COA)
1973
Association of Christian Schools,
Colleges and Universities
Accrediting Agency, Inc. (ACSCU-
AAI)
1976
33. Accrediting Agencies for Public Sector
Accrediting Agencies Year Established
Accrediting Agency of Chartered
College and Universities of the
Philippines, Inc. (AACCUP)
1987
Association of Local Colleges and
Universities Commission on
Accreditation (ALCUCOA)
2003
