![TFTN Concept “Creation and maintenance of high-quality, nationwide transportation data that is in the public domain” ,[object Object]]()
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (16)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to TFTN Executive Steering Committee (10-20-2010)
Similar to TFTN Executive Steering Committee (10-20-2010) (20)
More from KSI Koniag
More from KSI Koniag (18)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
TFTN Executive Steering Committee (10-20-2010)
- 1. Executive Steering Committee Meeting October 20th, 2010 Strategic Planning for Transportation for the Nation (TFTN)
- 3. Nationwide data spanning all states and territories
- 4. All roads, not just Federally funded roads
- 5. Provides a common geometric baseline
- 6. Road naming
- 7. Persistent segment ID numbering
- 8. Advanced functionality is built on top of baseline
- 9. Data is in the public domain and readily shareable10/20/2010 2 http://www.tftn.org
- 12. Define requirements, challenges and opportunities
- 13. Document progress already made
- 15. Best Practices
- 16. New Ideas
- 18. Evaluate funding sources10/20/2010 4 http://www.tftn.org
- 19. Steering Committee Roles and Responsibilities 10/20/2010 5 http://www.tftn.org
- 21. Presentations & Workshops 10/20/2010 7 http://www.tftn.org
- 22. Interviews 10/20/2010 8 http://www.tftn.org
- 25. All the interviewees so far have indicated their support for this effort
- 26. Identified several existing national data sets and potential business models
- 27. Several stakeholders observed that ‘the time was right’ for this kind of initiative
- 28. Road safety opens opportunities–
- 29. DOT Safety group is interested in all roads. Road safety provides a significant funding opportunity
- 30. Will allow Emergency Managers to see outside their state’s “Keyhole”10/20/2010 10 http://www.tftn.org
- 32. States are beginning to look beyond their borders
- 33. States are the authoritative data source for their transportation data
- 34. “Can you live with that”–
- 35. All interviewees have different needs
- 36. Need to find a baseline that works with everyone
- 37. Once the baseline is established, then consumers can add their own “special sauce”10/20/2010 11 http://www.tftn.org
- 39. With Initial Minimal Requirements…
- 41. Private Sector: Full routability and immersive imagery USGS: Enhanced cartographic display and labeling US Census: Polygon topology for census geographic units US & State DOTs: Full routability, Linear Referencing System (LRS) & advanced attributes State E911: Addresses TFTN: Common baseline foundation of geometry, basic attributes
- 42. Geospatial Transportation Data Requirements Collected from Federal AgenciesCensus and USGS Survey on road requirements - October 2010Meeting October 19, 200918 Federal Agencies
- 43. Examples of road features & attributes required by Federal Agencies 10/20/2010 17 http://www.tftn.org
- 44. Examples of road geometry characteristics required by Federal Agencies 10/20/2010 18 http://www.tftn.org
- 46. FHWA Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) 10/20/2010 20 http://www.tftn.org
- 47. TIGER 10/20/2010 21 http://www.tftn.org
- 48. Private/Public Partnerships 10/20/2010 22 http://www.tftn.org
- 49. OpenStreetMap (OSM) & Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) 10/20/2010 23 http://www.tftn.org
- 50. The Road Ahead!
- 52. Through these, we will:
- 53. Identify what’s working, what’s needed – current practices, requirements, strategies, standards, documentation
- 54. State use cases
- 55. Characterize existing data sets and business models
- 56. Identify institutional constraints, capacity, operational authority, motivation, benefits, etc.
- 57. Formulate strategies for implementation
- 58. Identify potential sources of funding
- 59. Final Report Timeline
- 60. Draft Report to Steering Committee by mid December
- 61. Final Report mid-January10/20/2010 25 http://www.tftn.org
- 63. Criteria to measure TFTN Strategic Planning project success.
- 64. What are your reactions to the notion of a public/private partnership?10/20/2010 26 http://www.tftn.org
- 65. Open Discussion 10/20/2010 27 http://www.tftn.org
Editor's Notes
- Identify and engage stakeholders -All levels of government-Private Sector-Citizens (e.g. OpenStreetMap community)
- NARC National Association of Regional Communities
- SafetyHighway Performance Management SystemIntelligent Transportation SystemsAsset ManagementDeputy Director of RITA
- Road namingBasic attributes (e.g. functional classification)Persistent segment ID numbering
- LRS, routing and addresses could or might need to be part of the base
- Early October Survey is sent outFirst Meeting October 19th 2009November 16th Survey must be returnedFollow up conference call December 15th 2009 Sample Agencies- Census- NGA- OSD- Oak Ridge National Lab- DOI- BLM- DOI - Fish and Wildlife- DOI USGS- DOT FHWA- EPA- Library of Congress- FGDC- USDA Farm Agency- USDA Forest Service- USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service
- Current positional accuracy improved to 7.6 meterBoundaries are the “real issue” for Census Bureau, not roads; DOTs might need greater detail
- Through these, we will: Identify what’s working, what’s needed – current practices, requirements, strategies, standards, documentation Identify institutional constraints, capacity, operational authority, motivation, benefits, etc. Formulate strategies for implementation Identify potential sources of funding