4. Oxford Textbooks in Clinical Neurology
Oxford Textbook of Epilepsy and Epileptic Seizures, edited by Simon Shorvon, Renzo Guerrini, Mark Cook, and Samden Lhatoo
Oxford Textbook of Vertigo and Imbalance, edited by Adolfo Bronstein
Oxford Textbook of Movement Disorders, edited by David Burn
Oxford Textbook of Neuromuscular Disorders, edited by David Hilton-Jones and Martin Turner (forthcoming)
Oxford Textbook of Neuroimaging, edited by Massimo Filippi (forthcoming)
Oxford Textbook of Neurorehabilitation, edited by Volker Dietz and Nick Ward (forthcoming)
Oxford Textbook of Neuro-oncology, edited by Tracy Batchelor, Ryo Nishikawa, Nancy Tarbell, and Michael Weller (forthcoming)
Oxford Textbook of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia, edited by Masud Husain and Jonathan Schott (forthcoming)
Oxford Textbook of Headache Syndromes, edited by Michel Ferrari, Joost Haan, Andrew Charles, David Dodick, and Fumihiko Sakai
(forthcoming)
Oxford Textbook of Clinical Neurophysiology, edited by Kerry Mills (forthcoming)
5. 1
Oxford Textbook of
Stroke and
Cerebrovascular
Disease
Edited by
Bo Norrving
Professor in Neurology
Department of Clinical Sciences
Section of Neurology
Lund University
Lund, Sweden
Series Editor
Christopher Kennard
7. Stroke has always been a worldwide problem, but only now is it
being recognized as a global, treatable, and preventable condition,
largely through scientific advances and the work of stroke leaders
such as the contributors to this volume.
Knowledge accrues in pieces but is understood in patterns. The
internet has made information available in unprecedented quanti-
ties, but of uneven value. Bits and bytes of information are but a
few clicks away. However, these pieces have to be put in patterns, in
context, and we need to recognize the fact that we still know much
less than we need to know, hence the need for a comprehensive,
credible, and accessible book.
Bo Norrving and his international cast of authors offer such a
volume. In addition to the usual chapters on anatomy, pathophysi-
ology, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation, there are chapters
on the increasingly recognized areas of silent infarcts and micro-
bleeds, vascular cognitive impairment and dementia, and the
long-term management of stroke. As a former President of the
World Stroke Organization, the editor has led efforts to put stroke
at the forefront of global health policy by working with the World
Health Organization and the United Nations. This enlarged vision
of stroke is reflected in a chapter on primary stroke prevention and
one on healthcare services, topics that do not usually feature in
books on stroke.
May this book enjoy the broad readership that it deserves.
Vladimir Hachinski, CM, MD, FRCPC, DSc,
Dr. honoris causa X5
President, World Federation of Neurology
Foreword
8.
9. Stroke is huge by any measure: often cited data from the Global
Burden of Disease project are that there are 6 million deaths due
to stroke per year worldwide, 15 million cases of stroke per year,
and 30 million persons who have survived a stroke. Other stroke
measures are one new stroke every other second, every sixth sec-
ond stroke kills someone, and one in six will have a stroke during
their lifetime. Such numbers have different meanings to differ-
ent stakeholders. For the patient who has developed a stroke, and
for the carers, such data are of little interest (more than possibly
telling that ‘you are in good company, welcome to the club’)—
my own stroke is more than enough for me. For health person-
nel the figures are more alarming: how can we take good care of
so many patients, do we have the beds at the stroke unit (and is
there a stroke unit at all?), are there rehabilitation and follow-up
resources available? Who can do the job, who have the right edu-
cation and competence? For health administrators, healthcare
planners, and politicians the numbers should be alarming: what
are the precise numbers in my country or region? What is the
trend? What can be done (and what can I do) to help and to pre-
vent stroke? And, will the numbers affect the financial situation in
my community?
Fortunately the stroke scene is changing—the Cinderella tale
being a good analogy of what has happened. Only a few decades
ago (when I started in neurology as my first summer job) stroke
had the lowest priority at the emergency department because
there was no hurry and nothing could be done acutely. Stroke
units were unheard of—at my local hospital there was even a
hospital agreement by which patients who were impossible to
rehabilitate (definition: age 65 years and above) were outsourced
to various other departments (dermatology, renal disease, oncol-
ogy . . . ) so that the burden of stroke to the hospital could be
shared. Patients used to stay in bed for 1–2 weeks before any
mobilization took place. Heparin treatment was widely used
to prevent or treat progressing stroke whereas antiplatelets and
statins were unknown at that time. Carotid surgery was per-
formed by thoracic surgeons with rates of serious complication
well above 10%. Any ultra-early therapy was regarded as doomed
to fail since science told us that brain cells could not survive more
than 5–10 minutes of ischaemia. Looking back, I have some diffi-
culties understanding why stroke nevertheless caught my interest
and attracted me.
Readers of this preface need not be told in detail what has hap-
pened during the last few decades: the introduction of acute
neuroimaging and other diagnostic tools, the demonstration
of acute thrombolytic therapy as one of medicine’s best buys, the
glory of organized stroke care (including early mobilization), the
development of secondary prevention strategies that have changed
the prognosis after stroke drastically, and the demonstration that
rehabilitation works—just to mention a few of the groundbreaking
changes that have taken place. There has also been an avalanche
of knowledge of mechanisms, causes, unusual features, stroke
subtypes, and genetics. Advances in science have had a profound
impact on clinical practice in stroke.
Another major change is a focus on stroke prevention through
joint actions with other non-communicable diseases (NCDs)
that share similar risk factors. Stroke is not acting alone in this
movement, but is part of the NCD cluster that has rightfully
received high governmental attention during the last few years.
Stroke shares many risk factors with heart disease, peripheral
vascular disease, cancer, dementia, and pulmonary disease—just
to mention a few members of the NCD family.
The World Stroke Organization emphasizes three pillars in the
Global Agenda for Stroke: prevention, acute care, and long-term
management. The latter component has been particularly neglected
and warrants much more attention in the future. Few areas in medi-
cine have such broad outreach, involve so many sectors of health-
care, and have such a profound influence on public health as stroke.
For this book I have had the privilege of working together with
many of today’s most outstanding stroke scientists. I am grateful to
all of you for sharing your deep knowledge, and for making your-
selves available for the task. I take this opportunity to thank you all
most warmly for your contributions to this volume. I also thank
the very large number of people in the scientific stroke community,
within the World Stroke Organization and regional stroke organiza-
tions, who have provided me with inspiration for the present work.
I would also like to thank the staff at Oxford University Press
for expert help and support in making this book available. My
thanks go to Peter Stevenson who set me the task initially, to Eloise
Moir-Ford for keeping track of all manuscript versions and chapter
status, to Papitha Ramesh and Nic Williams for copy editing, and
to the many other people at Oxford University Press who have been
involved with this book. It has been a pleasure working with you.
Preface
10. preface
viii
Finally, my thanks to my wife Lena and my three children (David,
Marcus, and Maria) for having been (quite) tolerant of the intru-
sion of my out-of-usual-business-hours’ work into family pleasures
and duties.
It is my hope that the book will be read, will be disseminated
broadly, and will finally lead to benefits for patients and carers.
Only at the latter stage has a textbook like this one served its ulti-
mate purpose.
Bo Norrving
Lund, Sweden
October 2013
11. List of Abbreviations xi
List of Contributors xiii
1 Epidemiology of stroke 1
Valery Feigin and Rita Krishnamurthi
2 Risk factors 9
Arne Lindgren
3 Arteries and veins of the brain:
anatomical organization 19
Laurent Tatu, Fabrice Vuillier, and Thierry Moulin
4 Pathophysiology of transient ischaemic
attack and ischaemic stroke 35
Jong S. Kim
5 Pathophysiology of non-traumatic
intracerebral haemorrhage 51
Constanza Rossi and Charlotte Cordonnier
6 Spontaneous intracranial subarachnoid
haemorrhage: epidemiology, causes,
diagnosis, and complications 61
Laurent Thines and Charlotte Cordonnier
7 Clinical features of transient
ischaemic attacks 79
David Calvet and Jean-Louis Mas
8 Clinical features of acute stroke 85
José M. Ferro and Ana Catarina Fonseca
9 Diagnosing transient ischaemic
attack and stroke 94
Bruce Campbell and Stephen Davis
10 Management of stroke: general principles 106
Mehmet Akif Topcuoğlu and Hakan Ay
11 Acute phase therapy in ischaemic stroke 124
Krassen Nedeltchev and Heinrich P. Mattle
12 Acute management and treatment of
intracerebral haemorrhage 130
Marek Sykora, Jennifer Diedler, and Thorsten Steiner
13 Acute treatment in subarachnoid
haemorrhage 139
Katja E. Wartenberg
14 Less common causes of stroke: diagnosis
and management 153
Turgut Tatlisumak, Jukka Putaala, and Stephanie Debette
15 Secondary prevention of stroke 163
Thalia S. Field and Oscar R. Benavente
16 Prognosis after stroke 185
Vincent Thijs
17 Silent cerebral infarcts and microbleeds 194
Bo Norrving
18 Complications after stroke 203
Hanne Christensen, Elsebeth Glipstrup,
Nis Høst, Jens Nørbæk, and Susanne Zielke
19 Vascular cognitive impairment and dementia 215
Didier Leys, Kei Murao, and Florence Pasquier
20 Brain repair after stroke 225
Steven C. Cramer
21 Rehabilitation after stroke 234
Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen
22 The long-term management of stroke 243
Reza Bavarsad Shahripour and Geoffrey A. Donnan
23 Primary prevention of stroke 255
Anna M. Cervantes-Arslanian and Sudha Seshadri
24 Organized stroke care: Germany and Canada 270
Silke Wiedmann, Peter U. Heuschmann,
and Michael D. Hill
Index 279
Contents
12.
13. ACA anterior cerebral artery
ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme
AChA anterior choroidal artery
ACoA anterior communicating artery
ADL activities of daily living
ADL Alzheimer disease
AF atrial fibrillation
AHA American Heart Association
AICA anterior inferior cerebellar artery
ARB angiotensin receptor blocker
ARER absolute risk reduction
ASA American Stroke Association
AUC area under the curve
AVM arteriovenous malformation
BI Barthel Index
CAA cerebral amyloid angiopathy
CADASIL cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with
subcortical infarcts and leucoencephalopathy
CARASIL cerebral autosomal recessive arteriopathy with
subcortical infarcts and leucoencephalopathy
CAS carotid angioplasty and stenting
CBV cerebral blood volume
CEA carotid endarterectomy
CEAD cervical artery dissection
CEAD carotid endarterectomy
CHS Cardiovascular Health Study
CMB cerebral microbleed
CNS central nervous system
CSF cerebrospinal fluid
CT computed tomography
CTV computed tomography venography
CVD cerebrovascular disease
CVT cerebral venous thrombosis
DALY disability-adjusted life year
DAVF dural arteriovenous fistula
DCI delayed cerebral ischaemia
DNR do not resuscitate
DOAC direct oral anticoagulant
DSA digital subtraction angiography
DVT deep vein thrombosis
DWI diffusion-weighted imaging
ECG electrocardiogram
eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate
ESO European Stroke Organisation
EVD extraventricular drain
FDA Food and Drug Administration
FFP fresh frozen plasma
FHS Framingham Heart Study
FLAIR fluid attenuated inversion recovery
GABA gamma-aminobutyric acid
GOS Glasgow Outcome Scale
GOS Glasgow Outcome Scale
GRE gradient echo
HANAC hereditary angiopathy with nephropathy,
aneurysm, and muscle cramps
HDL high-density lipoprotein
HERNS hereditary endotheliopathy with
retinopathy, nephropathy, and stroke
HR hazard ratio
IA intra-arterial
IAT intra-arterial thrombolysis
ICH intracerebral haemorrhage
IDR incidence density ratio
IHD ischaemic heart disease
INR international normalized ratio
IST International Stroke Trial
ITT intention-to-treat
LDL low-density lipoprotein
LP lumbar puncture
LUTS lower urinary tract symptoms
MAP mean arterial pressure
MCA middle cerebral artery
MET S metabolic syndrome
MMSE Mini Mental State Examination
MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment
MRI magnetic resonance imaging
mRS modified Rankin Scale
MRV magnetic resonance venography
List of Abbreviations
14. list of abbreviations
xii
MTT mean transit time
NCD non-communicable disease
NG nasogastric
NHS Nurses’ Health Study
NICC neurocritical care unit
NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
NINDS National Institute of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke
NMDA N-methyl-D-aspartate
NOAC novel oral anticoagulant
NVAF non-valvular atrial fibrillation
OCSP Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project
OHS Oxford Handicap Score
PAR population attributable risk
PbtO2 partial pressure of cerebral tissue oxygen
PCA posterior cerebral artery
PCC prothrombin complex concentrate
PChA posterior choroidal arteries
PE pulmonary embolus
PEG percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
PET positron emission tomography
PFO patent foramen ovale
PHS Physicians’ Health Study
PICA posterior inferior cerebellar artery
PoCA posterior communicating artery
PRN pro re nata (as needed)
PSD post-stroke dementia
RCVS reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome
RR relative risk
RRR relative risk reduction
rtPA recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
SAH subarachnoid haemorrhage
SCA superior cerebellar artery
SCD sickle cell disease
SCI silent cerebral infarct
SCM silent cerebral microbleed
SDB sleep-disordered breathing
SD standard deviation
SES socioeconomic status
SIADH syndrome of inappropriate secretion
of antidiuretic hormone
SITCH Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage
SLE systemic lupus erythematosus
SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism
SWI susceptibility-weighted imaging
TBI traumatic brain injury
TCS Takotsubo cardiomyopathy syndrome
Tmax time to maximum
TOAST Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment
TOF time-of-flight
tPA tissue plasminogen activator
TTP time to peak
UK United Kingdom
US United States
VaD vascular dementia
VCI vascular cognitive impairment
WFNS World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scale
WHO World Health Organization
WHS Women’s Health Study
WML white matter lesion
15. Hakan Ay Stroke Service, Department of Neurology, A.A.
Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of
Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, MA, USA
Oscar R. Benavente Stroke and Cerebrovascular Health,
Vancouver Stroke Program, Brain Research Center, Department
of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
David Calvet Paris Descartes University, Centre de Psychiatrie
et Neurosciences INSERM UMR 894, and Department of
Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris
Bruce Campbell Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne
Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
Anna M. Cervantes-Arslanian Boston University Department
of Neurology, Boston, MA, USA
Hanne Christensen Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg
Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Charlotte Cordonnier Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit,
Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
Steven C. Cramer Departments of Neurology and Anatomy &
Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
Stephen Davis President, World Stroke Organization; Director,
Neuroscience and Continuing Care Service; Director,
Melbourne Brain Centre at RMH; Director of Neurology,
The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Stephanie Debette Université de Versailles
Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France; and Inserm U740,
Université Paris, Paris, France; and Department of Neurology,
Lariboisière University Hospital, DHU Neurovasc Sorbonne
Paris-Cité, Paris, France; and Department of Neurology, Boston
University School of Medicine, The Framingham Heart Study,
Boston, MA, USA
Jennifer Diedler Department of Neurology, University of
Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Geoffrey A. Donnan Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental
Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
Valery Feigin National Institute for Stroke and Applied
Neurosciences, Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences
AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand
José M. Ferro Department of Neurosciences, Hospital de Santa
Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
Thalia S. Field Vancouver Stroke Program, Brain Research Center,
Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Ana Catarina Fonseca Department of Neurology, Hospital de
Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal
Elsebeth Glipstrup Mental Health Services, Bispebjerg Hospital,
Copenhagen, Denmark
Nis Høst Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital,
Copenhagen, Denmark
Peter U. Heuschmann Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and
Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Michael D. Hill Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical
Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Canada
Jong S. Kim University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul,
South Korea; and Stroke Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul,
South Korea
Rita Krishnamurthi National Institute for Stroke and Applied
Neurosciences, Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences,
AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand
Didier Leys Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
Arne Lindgren Department of Neurology Lund, Skåne University
Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Jean-Louis Mas Paris Descartes University, Centre de Psychiatrie
et Neurosciences INSERM UMR 894 and Department of
Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France
Heinrich P. Mattle Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern,
Switzerland
Thierry Moulin Service de Neurologie 2,Centre Hospitalier
Universitaire, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
List of Contributors
16. list of contributors
xiv
Kei Murao Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
Krassen Nedeltchev Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
Jens Nørbæk Mental Health Services, Bispebjerg Hospital,
Copenhagen, Denmark
Bo Norrving Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of
Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Florence Pasquier Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
Jukka Putaala Department of Neurology, Helsinki University
Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Constanza Rossi Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit,
University of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
Sudha Seshadri Boston University Department of Neurology,
Boston, MA, USA
Reza Bavarsad Shahripour Florey Institute of Neuroscience
and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville,
Australia
Thorsten Steiner Department of Neurology, University of
Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of
Neurology, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen Department of Clinical
Neurosciences, University of Gothenburg, Institute of
Neuroscience and Physiology, Sweden
Marek Sykora Department of Neurology, University of
Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of
Neurology, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
Laurent Tatu Laboratoire d’Anatomie, UFR Sciences médicales
et pharmaceutiques, Université de Franche-Comté,
Besançon, France; and Service d’Explorations et pathologies
neuro-musculaires, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Université
de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
Turgut Tatlisumak Department of Neurology, Helsinki University
Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Vincent Thijs Department of Neurology, University Hospitals
Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Laurent Thines Division of Neurosurgery, Department
of Neurosciences and Locomotive System,
Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
Mehmet Akif Topcuoğlu Hacettepe University Hospitals,
Department of Neurology, Ankara, Turkey
Fabrice Vuillier Laboratoire d’Anatomie, UFR Sciences médicales
et pharmaceutiques, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon,
France; and Service de Neurologie 2, Centre Hospitalier
Universitaire, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
Silke Wiedmann Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry,
University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Katja E. Wartenberg Neurocritical Care Unit, Department of
Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle
(Saale), Germany
Susanne Zielke Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg Hospital,
Copenhagen, Denmark
17. Introduction
Stroke is the second most common cause of death worldwide and
a frequent cause of adult disability in developed countries (1, 2).
Stroke burden on families and society is projected to rise from
approximately 38 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost
globally in 1990 to 61 million DALYs in 2020 (3) due to population
ageing. Stroke also has a large physical, psychological, and finan-
cial impact on patients/families, the healthcare system, and society
(4, 5). Lifetime costs per stroke patient range from US$59,800 to
US$230,000 (5). The majority (about 75%) of cases of stroke occur
in people over the age of 65 years (6, 7), and about one-third of
patients die of stroke within a year of onset (8, 9). Over half of survi-
vors remain dependent on others for everyday activities, often with
significant adverse effects on caregivers (10). Many factors increase
the risk of stroke, and these are generally divided into two catego-
ries: modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. Age, gender, and
ethnicity are non-modifiable risk factors for stroke. Modifiable or
potentially modifiable risk factors include a number of physiologi-
cal and environmental factors and include hypertension, elevated
total cholesterol, smoking, physical inactivity, alcohol consump-
tion, and atrial fibrillation (11).
Stroke mortality data are available from more than 24 countries
(12, 13) showing that, in general, rates have declined for several
decades. In some countries, stroke mortality has declined since
the early 1950s, but the rate of this decline has recently slowed
(14–17). While large national or international stroke mortality
data may be used for determining overall burden of fatal strokes
and trends in stroke mortality, stroke mortality data are often not
accurate (diagnosis classification bias) and have limited value for
healthcare planning and organization. The role of changes in inci-
dence and improved survival to downward trend in stroke mor-
tality are not adequately quantified, chiefly due to difficulties in
measuring stroke incidence accurately (18, 19); however the results
from the World Health Organization (WHO) Monitoring Trends
and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) pro-
ject suggested that both declining and increasing stroke mortality
were principally attributable to changes in case fatality rather than
changes in incidence (20).
Importance of population-based
studies
Epidemiological studies form the basis of much of the medi-
cal research and current knowledge in stroke to inform health
professionals about best strategies for stroke care organization,
prevention, and management. The gaps in knowledge in stroke pre-
vention and management are continually filled by randomized con-
trol trials, case–control, and cohort studies (see Table 1.1). Some of
the most informative studies on stroke burden and optimal health-
care organization have arisen from population-based stroke inci-
dence and outcome studies. It is important that stroke is seen and
studied in a population context, as a large proportion of the bur-
den of care for stroke is borne outside the hospital sector (11–13).
Further, changes in referral patterns can distort longitudinal trends
derived from hospitalized cases. Assessing the need for prevention
strategies and services is best achieved via population-based stroke
registers to determine incidence and outcome (13).
Data on population trends in stroke incidence reflect the success/
failure of prevention strategies, while trends in case fatality and
outcome reflect changes in stroke management. Both are needed
to plan stroke services given high healthcare costs and limited
resources. Accurate and representative population-based data are
also crucial to: (i) determine the true incidence, causes and out-
come of stroke; (ii) implement evidence-based healthcare planning,
across the care spectrum; (iii) evaluate the need for and impact of
preventative/management strategies; (iv) address persistent uncer-
tainty about what key factors (socioeconomic and health service)
impact stroke recovery; (v) examine the natural course of recovery,
in particular for cognitive and behavioural outcomes; (vi) provide
information on access and satisfaction with stroke services; and
(vii) identify service gaps/unmet needs to ensuring evidence-based
policy, resource allocation, prevention planning, management ser-
vices, and evaluation of service performance.
Assessing the need for prevention strategies and services is most
sensitively achieved with the use of population-based registers to
determine the incidence and outcome of stroke. However, study-
ing stroke in a population-based fashion is particularly challenging
(19), so that such epidemiological studies are relatively rare com-
pared with studies using mortality data, hospital-based stroke reg-
isters, or incidence studies in younger age groups only.
In 1987, Malmgren et al. (23) published a list of 12 criteria related
to definitions, methods, and mode of data presentation, by which
the quality of population-based studies of stroke could be judged.
These criteria have been updated by Sudlow et al. (19) in 1997 and
most recently by Feigin et al. (Table 1.2) (24, 25).
However, these criteria are so demanding in practice that even
the stroke component of the WHO MONICA project is generally
regarded as having failed to meet them (18). Even among many reg-
isters that are population based, many were limited to people under
the age of 75 years, yet only half of all strokes occur in these age
groups. Although ‘ideal’ stroke incidence studies based on both core
Epidemiology of stroke
Valery Feigin and Rita Krishnamurthi
CHAPTER 1
18. oxford textbook of stroke and cerebrovascular disease
2
and supplementary criteria (24, 25) are the most valuable source of
information for developing evidence-based strategies for stroke pre-
vention and health services, to address the problem of accurate and
comparable stroke incidence studies in less affluent countries with
limited resources where most strokes occur, a WHO stepwise stroke
surveillance approach (26) can be recommended (Figure 1.1).
An alternative approach for studying stroke incidence and preva-
lence in countries with very limited resources could include a com-
bination of a stroke prevalence survey (e.g. door-to-door study) with
a study of death certificates (verbal autopsy procedures) in the same
community (Figure 1.2), as recently recommended by Feigin (27).
Stroke burden in high-income
countries
Historically, information on stroke incidence, prevalence, early
case-fatality came predominantly from studies in high-income
countries. In addition, long-term trends in stroke incidence
in different populations are not well characterized, largely due
to difficulties of population-based stroke surveillance (19, 28,
29). However recent studies in mid- to low-income countries
have allowed comparisons in stroke burden and current trends.
A recent systematic review of worldwide stroke incidence and
early case-fatality (29) found that over the last four decades
(1970–2008) there was a statistically significant 42% decrease in
stroke incidence rates (1.1% annual reduction) in high-income
countries (Figure 1.3A), with the more pronounced reduction in
people younger than 75 years and in people with ischaemic stroke.
This decrease may be attributable to the effective implementation
of preventative measures and management of risk factors in these
populations.
However, in low- to middle-income countries stroke incidence
rates for the same time period have increased by over 100% and
currently exceed those in high-income countries. It was also shown
that the risk of stroke is increasing with the age of the population
in developed countries (Figure 1.4) (30). The reasons for this dif-
ference are unclear, but are a matter of great importance for two
main reasons: (i) stroke is a leading cause of disability in adults and
(ii) the elderly (the most stroke-prone age group) constitute the
fastest-growing segment of the population.
Currently (2000–2008), proportional frequency of ischaemic
stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage, and subarachnoid haemorrhage
Table 1.1 Common epidemiological terms
Term Definition Comments
Incidence The number of new cases of a disease that occur over a
specified period of time
The incidence rate is a measure of morbidity (illness) and can be
looked at in any population group such as males, persons exposed to a
particular chemical toxin, etc.
Attack rate A measure of how fast a disease is occurring in a
population
Attack rates tell us how many new cases of a disease occur over a
specific period of time
Prevalence The proportion of the population affected by a disease
at that time
Prevalence is calculated by dividing the number of people who have
the disease by the number of people in the community. It provides a
snapshot of who has the disease at that point in time and does not
take into account the duration of the disease
Mortality A measure of the proportion of deaths over a specific
time period in a given population
Mortality is measured in the entire population at risk from dying from
the disease, including both those who have and do not have the disease
Case-fatality A measure of the proportion of deaths over a specific
period of time in individuals with a specified disease
Case-fatality is a measure of the severity of that disease. In contrast to
mortality, case-fatality is limited to those who already have the disease
Population attributable
risk (PAR)
A measure of the proportion of disease incidence in
a total population that can be attributed to a specific
exposure
The PAR tells us the extent to which the elimination of a particular
exposure would reduce the incidence rate of a particular disease in the
whole population
Disability-adjusted
life year (DALY)
Years of life lost to premature death and years lived with
a disability of a specified severity and duration
DALYs are a means of expressing the overall burden of a disease. Each
DALY is 1 lost year of healthy life
Randomized clinical
trial (RCT)
A type of study design used to evaluate a particular
intervention usually for the treatment or prevention of
a disease. The subjects are randomly allocated to either
the treatment (e.g. the test drug) or control (e.g. no
treatment) group
An RCT can be used to study the effectives of a new drug to treat
a condition compared to another drug or no treatment at all. In a
‘double-blind’ RCT both the subjects in the study and the researcher
measuring the outcome are unaware of the allocation of the treatment
groups, thus reducing bias
Cohort studies A population with an exposure and a population without
the exposure are followed to compare an outcome of
interest between the groups
Typically, the study population must be followed up for a long period
of time for the outcome of interest to develop. A well-known example
is the Framingham study (21)
Case–control studies A study design aimed to examine the possible relation
of an exposure to a certain disease. A group with the
disease (cases) is compared with a group without the
disease (controls)
If there is an association of an exposure with a disease, there should be
a higher prevalence of the exposure in the cases than in the controls
Adapted from Gordis (22).
19. CHAPTER 1 epidemiology of stroke 3
Table 1.2 Gold standards for an ‘ideal’ stroke incidence study
Domains Core criteria Supplementary criteria
Standard
definitions
• World Health Organization definition of stroke
• At least 80% CT/MRI verification of the diagnosis of ischaemic stroke, intracerebral
haemorrhage, and subarachnoid haemorrhagea
• First-ever-in-a-lifetime stroke
• Classification of ischaemic stroke into subtypes
(e.g. large artery disease, cardioembolic, small artery
disease, other)a
• Recurrent strokea
Standard
methods
• Complete, population-based case ascertainment, based on multiple overlapping
sources of information (hospitals, outpatient clinics, general practitioners, death
certificates)b
• Prospective study design
• Large, well-defined and stable population, allowing at least 100,000 person-years
of observationb
• Follow-up of patients’ vital status for at least 1 montha
• Reliable method for estimating denominator (not more than 5 years old census data)b
• Ascertainment of patients with TIA, recurrent
strokes and those referred for brain, carotid or
cerebral vascular imaginga
• ‘Hot pursuit’ of cases
• Direct assessment of under-ascertainmenta by regular
checking of general practitioners’ databases and
hospital admissions for acute vascular problems and
cerebrovascular imaging studies and/or interventions
Standard data
presentation
• Complete calendar years of data; not more than 5 years of data averaged togetherb
• Men and women presented separately
• Mid-decade age bands (e.g. 55–64 years) used in publications, including oldest
age group (≥85 years)b
• 95% confidence interval around rates
• Unpublished 5-year age bands available for
comparison with other studies
a New criteria.
b Updated, modified from Sudlow and Warlow (19).
Reprinted from Feigin and Carter (25) with permission.
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Community
events
Module 6
Hospital
events &
vital status
Module 1
+ Disability
Module 2
+ Subtype
Module 3
Autopsy
Module 5
Population-
based
Hospital-
based
Population
coverage Non-fatal events in
community
Fatal events in
community
Events in hospital
Comprehensive
Expanded
Standard
Cause of
death
(death certifi-
cate or verbal
autopsy)
Module 4
in high-income countries were estimated as 82%, 11%, and 3%,
respectively (29). Early (1-month) case fatality in high-income
countries has decreased over the last four decades from 35.9% to
19.8%, potentially due to improved management of acute strokes,
and possibly a shift towards less severe strokes. Overall, case-fatality
within 1 month of stroke onset in high-income countries is cur-
rently about 23% and is higher for intracerebral haemorrhage
(42%) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (32%) than for ischaemic
stroke (16%) (30).
A recent systematic review of population-based stroke incidence
and prevalence studies showed the age-standardized prevalence of
stroke in people aged 65 years and older ranges worldwide from
46–72 per 1000 population (Figure 1.5) (30). Stroke makes a signif-
icant contribution to disability burden in low- and middle-income
Fig. 1.1 STEP-wise approach to stroke
surveillance. (Adapted from Truelsen et al. (24)
with permission.)
20. oxford textbook of stroke and cerebrovascular disease
4
countries (31), and the recent 2010 Global Burden of Disease
Project ranked stroke as the fifth highest cause of DALYs worldwide
in 2010 (an increase of 19% from 1990) (32). In terms of global
variation, stroke burden was shown to be higher in China, Africa,
and South America, and lower national income was associated with
higher relative mortality and burden of stroke (33).
Stroke burden in low- to
middle-income countries
One of the major challenges in stroke epidemiology is the lack
of good-quality epidemiological studies in developing countries
(34). According to WHO estimates, death from stroke in devel-
oping (low- and middle-income) countries in 2001 accounted for
85.5% of stroke deaths worldwide (35), and the number of DALYs,
which comprises years of life lost and years lived with disability
(35), in these countries was almost seven times that in developed
(high-income) countries (4, 27).
Recent meta-analysis of population-based stroke incidence stud-
ies (29) showed that unlike high-income countries, the incidence
of stroke in low- to middle-income countries has increased by
100% over the last four decades (1970–2008) (Figure 1.3B). Stroke
incidence rates in low- to middle-income countries increased
with increasing age in a similar manner to high-income countries
(Figure 1.6).
Although ischaemic stroke is the dominating stroke pathologi-
cal type all over the world, the proportional frequency of intrac-
erebral haemorrhage in low- to middle-income countries tends
to be noticeably greater than that in high-income countries
(Figure 1.7) (29).
There is evidence from recent studies that the risk factors for
stroke in middle- to low-income countries are similar to that in
high-income countries, including high blood pressure, smoking,
and obesity, although the relative significance of stroke risk fac-
tors in high- and low- to middle-income countries may be dif-
ferent (see Chapter 2). The increase in stroke incidence in low- to
middle-income counties may be attributed to the poor manage-
ment of these risk factors. While early case fatality is similar to that
of high-income countries, the decrease in early case fatality is not
as high as that in high-income countries.
Gender and ethnic differences in
stroke burden
There are notable gender and ethnic differences in stroke incidence
and outcomes both in high- and mid- to low-income countries.
Both socioeconomic and ethnic differences in the risk of stroke
have been seen in many countries (36–39). For example, higher
risks have been observed among Maori and Pacific people in New
Zealand (40, 41), and in the black populations in the United States
(36) and United Kingdom (37), compared to the white popula-
tion. Higher stroke attack rates in lower socioeconomic groups are
probably related to several factors. As a general rule, lower socio-
economic groups are more frequently exposed to risk factors for
cardiovascular disease, including hypertension, smoking, diabetes,
and excessive consumption of alcohol (42). In addition, it has been
suggested that lower socioeconomic groups have less access to, or
make less effective use of, services that are important to the man-
agement of these risk factors, such as early detection and control
of hypertension (43). Similarly, many of the ethnic differences in
stroke risk have been attributed to differences in socioeconomic
circumstances and exposure to risk factors (43). However, studies
of cardiovascular disease have found that not all of the differences
in attack rates among ethnic groups can be explained by differences
Study population
(about 25,000–30,000)
Prevalence study
(door-to-door survey)
Questionnaire to identify
subjects with possible stroke
over the past 3 years
Clinical examination of
screened positive subjects
Stroke is not
confirmed
Stroke is not
confirmed
Stroke confirmed
First-ever stroke First-ever stroke
Incident stroke cases
Stroke confirmed
Verbal autopsy procedure
Stroke suspected
(stroke mentioned in
death certificate)
Study of death certificates
over the past 3 years
Stroke not
suspected
Fig. 1.2 An alternative approach for studying stroke epidemiology in resource-poor countries. (Reprinted from Feigin (25) with permission.)
21. CHAPTER 1 epidemiology of stroke 5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
(a)
(b)
1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2008
Rochester, MN
Tartu, Estonia
Copenhagen, Denmark
Dublin, Ireland
North Karelia, Finland
Saku, Japan
Frederiksberg, Denmark
Espoo-Kauniainen, Finland
Soderham, Sweden
Shibata, Japan
Tilburg, Netherlands
Oyabe, Japan2
Auckland, NZ
Turku, Finland (1982)
Dijon, France
Ubmbia, Italy
Malmo, Sweden
Valley d'Aosta, Italy
Perth, Australia
Belluno, Italy
Greater Cincinnati, USA
Arcadia, Greece
L'Aquila, Italy
East Lancashire, UK
Inherred, Norway
Erlangen, Germany
South London, UK
Vibo Valentia, Italy
Melbourne, Australia
Scottish Borders region, UK
Porto, Portugal
Porto, Portugal2
Orebro, Sweden
Barbados
Lund-Orup, Sweden
Oxfordshire, UK
0
50
100
150
200
250
1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2008
Ibadan, Nigeria
Ulan Bator, Mongolia
Rohtak, India
Colombo, Sri Lanka
Novosibirsk, Russia
Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Martinique, French WestIndies
Uzhgorod, West Ukraine
Tbilisi, Georgia
iquque, Chile
Matao, Brazil
Mumbai, India
Fig. 1.3 (a) Age-adjusted annual incidence of stroke in high income countries per 100,000/year*. (b) Age-adjusted annual incidence of stroke in low to middle income
countries 100,000/year*. (Reprinted from Feigin et al. (13) with permission.)
in conventional cardiovascular risk factors, suggesting genetic and
other factors are important (44). Thus, there remains considerable
uncertainty regarding the relative importance of stroke risk factor
management and control and other factors in the aetiology of these
inequalities.
There is also some evidence suggesting ethnic differences in
stroke outcomes. In a recent prospective population-based study of
1127 patients with acute stroke in Auckland, New Zealand the risk
of dependency, as measured by Frenchay Activities, at 6 months
post-stroke was higher in non-Europeans (Asian and Pacific
22. oxford textbook of stroke and cerebrovascular disease
6
Four regions
of the U
SA
Auckland, N
Z
Taiwan, China
North
Yorkshire,
U
K
Rotterdam
, N
L
L’Aquila, Italy
Newcastle U
K
Men Women Both
0
10
20
30
40
50
Cases
per
1000
per
year
60
70
80
90
100
Fig. 1.5 Age-standardized prevalence of stroke per 1000 population in selected studies of people aged 65+ years. (Reprinted from Feigin et al. (26) with permission.)
0
<45 45–54 55–64
Rohtak, India (1971–74)
Ibadan, Nigeria (1971–74)
Colombo, Sri Lanka (1971–74)
Martinique, French West Indies (1998–99)
Iquique, Chile (2000-02)
Years
65–74 75+
2
4
6
8
10
Rate
per
1000
per
year
12
14
16
Fig. 1.6 Age-specific annual incidence of first-ever-in-lifetime stroke per 1000
population in selected developing countries. (Reprinted from Feigin (26) with
permission.)
0.00
<45 45–54 55–64
Age (years)
65–74 75–84 85+
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
Cases
per
1000
per
year
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
Melbourne, Australia
Frederiksberg, Denmark
L’Aqulia, Italy
Uzhgorod, Ukraine
Innherred, Norway
Arcadia, Greece
Oyabe, Japan
South London, UK
Perth, Australia
French West Indies
Novosibirsk, Russia
Auckland, NZ
Belluno, Italy
Erlangen, Germany
Espo-Kauniainen, Finland
Fig.1.4 Age-specific stroke incidence rates in selected, primarily high income countries per 1000-person-years. (Reprinted from Feigin et al. (13) with permission.)
people) compared to Europeans (after adjustment for casemix vari-
ables) (45). Measures of handicap and quality of life were also worse
in non-Europeans. Some ethnic differences particularly in stroke
outcomes may be attributable to socioeconomic status and acces-
sibility to healthcare, and/or to a higher prevalence of risk factors
in some ethnic groups.
Additionally, there are gender differences in stroke. The lifetime
risk of stroke in women (one in five) is greater than in men (one in
six) (46). This higher risk is primarily due to the greater life expec-
tancy of women. Worldwide evidence of better outcomes in male
stroke survivors is accumulating (47–51), yet reasons for these gen-
der differences in stroke outcomes are also unclear. Recent research
shows poorer functional outcomes and quality of life post stroke
in women are not due to differences in age, pre-stroke function,
and comorbidities (47). As women often have their stroke later
in relation to men they are also usually the most important fam-
ily caregivers (52). Their state of health can affect the health and
well-being of other family members and demands placed upon
23. CHAPTER 1 epidemiology of stroke 7
them in providing care to men and others within their social net-
work can also increase their risk of stroke (52, 53). A study of stroke
incidence in women showed that two-thirds of women with stroke
were not partnered compared with one-third of men (52). Due to
their greater life expectancy, more elderly women are likely to be
living alone, thus there is a greater risk of the need for institution-
alized care after stroke. More intensive treatment/rehabilitation
may be needed to improve outcomes for women, along with fur-
ther research to explore underlying biological mechanism of gen-
der differences in outcome (51). Accurate population-based data
on gender and ethnic differences in stroke burden and service use
will facilitate implementation of evidence-based recommendations
to bridge gaps in health services and increase uptake of lifestyle
changes in ethnic and sex groups (39).
Suggested public health strategies to
reduce the global stroke burden
The global stroke burden, particularly in low- to middle-income coun-
tries is likely to reach epidemic proportions if current trends continue.
In developing countries, there has been a shift towards urbanization
drivenbysocialandeconomicchanges.Thishasledtochangestowards
poorer diet and lifestyle choices thus increasing the prevalence of risk
factors, including smoking. With increasing life expectancy leading to
older populations, the burden of stroke will become a major cause for
concern unless urgent action is taken to implement population-based
prevention at local government and international levels.
For stroke prevention programmes to be effective, they should be
designed with an understanding of the independent relative risk,
prevalence, independent population attributable risk, and adapta-
tion of proven measures to modify or control the specific risk factor
(54, 55). Public health strategies to reduce global stroke burden
include increasing public stroke awareness, increasing awareness
of stroke risk factors, and the importance and effectiveness of pre-
vention. Additionally, local and national government bodies need
to take responsibility to improve lifestyle factors, for example, by
making fresh fruits and vegetables more affordable. Ways to reduce
tobacco use and reduce dietary salt intake must be explored and
implemented to reduce stroke risk. There is sufficient evidence for
effective strategies for stroke prevention (see Chapter 22); the chal-
lenge now is to apply this knowledge effectively to reduce the bur-
den of stroke globally.
References
1. Johnston SC, Mendis S, Mathers CD. Global variation in stroke burden
and mortality: estimates from monitoring, surveillance, and modelling.
Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):345–354.
2. Rothwell PM. The high cost of not funding stroke research: a comparison
with heart disease and cancer. Lancet. 2001;357(9268): 1612–1616.
3. Mackay J, Mensah GA. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
4. Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R. Preventing stroke: saving lives around
the world. Lancet Neurology. 2007 Feb;6(2):182–187.
5. Caro JJ, Huybrechts KF, Duchesne I. Management patterns and
costs of acute ischemic stroke: an international study. Stroke. 2000
Mar;31(3):582–590.
6. Bonita R, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Jamrozik KD, Stewart-Wynne
EG, Anderson NE. Stroke incidence and case fatality in Australasia.
A comparison of the Auckland and Perth population-based stroke
registers. Stroke. 1994 Mar;25(3):552–557.
7. Bonita R, Broad JB, Beaglehole R. Changes in stroke incidence
and case-fatality in Auckland, New Zealand, 1981-91. Lancet.
1993;342(8885):1470–1473.
D
ijon, France (1987)
Perth, Australia (1989)
Um
bria, Italy (1988)
O
xfordshire, U
K
(1984)
Aosta, Italy (1989)
Frederiksberg, D
enm
ark
(1989)
Soderham
n, Sweden
(1990)
M
elbourne, Australia (1996)
Perth, Australia (1995)
South
London, U
K
(1995)
Erlangen, G
erm
any (1994)
Arcadia, Greece (1993)
Belluno, Italy (1992)
L’aquila, Italy (1994)
Inherred, N
orway (1994)
M
artinique, French
W
est Indies (1998)
O
xfordshire, U
K
(2002)
Iquique, Chile (2002)
Rochester, U
SA
(1988)
100
Undetermined pathological type of stroke
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
Intracerebral haemorrhage
Cerebral infarction
90
80
70
60
50
40
Percentage
30
20
10
0
Fig. 1.7 Proportional frequency of stroke subtypes in selected populations. CI: cerebral infarction; ICH: intracerebral haemorrhage; SAH: subarachnoid haemorrhage;
UND: undetermined pathological type of stroke. (Modified from Feigin (13) with permission.)
24. oxford textbook of stroke and cerebrovascular disease
8
8. Anderson CS, Jamrozik KD, Broadhurst RJ, Stewart-Wynne EG.
Predicting survival for 1 year among different subtypes of stroke. Results
from the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 1994;25(10): 1935–1944.
9. Bonita R, Ford MA, Stewart AW. Predicting survival after stroke: a
three-year follow-up. Stroke. 1988;19(6):669–673.
10. Anderson CS, Linto J, Stewart-Wynne EG. A population-based
assessment of the impact and burden of caregiving for long-term stroke
survivors. Stroke. 1995 May;26(5):843–849.
11. Straus SE, Majumdar SR, McAlister FA. New evidence for stroke
prevention: scientific review. JAMA. 2002 Sep;288(11):1388–1395.
12. Bonita R, Stewart A, Beaglehole R. International trends in stroke
mortality: 1970-1985. Stroke. 1990 Jul;21(7):989–992.
13. Thom TJ. Stroke mortality trends. An international perspective. Ann
Epidemiol. 1993 Sep;3(5):509–518.
14. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
in older New Zealanders: a report to the National Health Committee.
Wellington, New Zealand: National Advisory Committee on Health and
Disability; 1998.
15. Australia NHFo. Heart Facts: 1995. Canberra, Australia: National Heart
Foundation; 1997.
16. Stroke: a looming epidemic? Australian Family Physician. 1997;26:
1137–1143.
17. Gillum RF, Sempos CT. The end of the long-term decline in stroke
mortality in the United States? Stroke. 1997 Aug;28(8):1527–1529.
18. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Monitoring stroke. An international challenge.
Stroke. 1995 Apr;26(4):541–542.
19. Sudlow CLM, Warlow CP. Comparing stroke incidence worldwide: what
makes studies comparable? Stroke. 1996 Mar;27(3):550–558.
20. Sarti C, Stegmayr B, Tolonen H, Mahonen M, Tuomilehto J, Asplund K.
Are changes in mortality from stroke caused by changes in stroke event
rates or case fatality? Results from the WHO MONICA Project. Stroke.
2003;34(8):1833–1840.
21. Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB. Probability of stroke: a
risk profile from the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991 Mar;22(3):312–318.
22. Gordis L. Epidemiology (4th edn). Oxford: Elsevier Limited; 2009.
23. MalmgrenR,BamfordJ,WarlowC,SandercockP,SlatteryJ.Projectingthe
number of patients with first ever strokes and patients newly handicapped
by stroke in England and Wales. BMJ. 1989;298(6674):656–660.
24. Feigin V, Hoorn SV. How to study stroke incidence. Lancet.
2004;363(9425):1920.
25. Feigin VL, Carter K. Stroke incidence studies one step closer to the
elusive gold standard? Stroke. 2004;35(9):2045–2047.
26. Truelsen T, Bonita R, Jamrozik K. Surveillance of stroke: a global
perspective. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(Suppl):S11–S6.
27. Feigin VL. Stroke in developing countries: can the epidemic be stopped
and outcomes improved? Lancet Neurol. 2007 Feb;6(2):94–97.
28. Anderson CS, Carter KN, Hackett ML, Feigin V, Barber PA, Broad JB,
et al. Trends in stroke incidence in Auckland, New Zealand, during 1981
to 2003. Stroke. 2005;36(10):2087–2093.
29. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide
stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based
studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):355–369.
30. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS. Stroke epidemiology: a
review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and
case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(1):43–53.
31. Sousa RM, Ferri CP, Acosta D, Albanese E, Guerra M, Huang Y, et al.
Contributionofchronicdiseasestodisabilityinelderlypeopleincountries
with low and middle incomes: a 10/66 Dementia Research Group
population-based survey. Lancet. 2009 Nov 28;374(9704):1821–1830.
32. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C,
et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries
in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012 Dec;380(9859):2197–223.
33. Kim AS, Johnston SC. Global variation in the relative burden of stroke
and ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2011 Jul;124(3):314–323.
34. Feigin VL. Stroke epidemiology in the developing world. Lancet.
2005;365(9478):2160–2161.
35. Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJL. The burden of disease and mortality
by condition: data, methods, and results for 2001. In Lopez AD, Mathers
CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL (eds) Global Burden of Disease
and Risk Factors (pp. 45–240). New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
36. Sacco RL, Boden-Albala B, Gan R, Chen X, Kargman DE, Shea S, et al.
Stroke incidence among white, black, and Hispanic residents of an urban
community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Am J Epidemiol.
1998;147(3):259–268.
37. Stewart JA, Dundas R, Howard RS, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Ethnic
differences in incidence of stroke: prospective study with stroke register.
BMJ. 1999;318(7189):967–971.
38. van Rossum CT, van de MH, Breteler MM, Grobbee DE, Mackenbach JP.
Socioeconomic differences in stroke among Dutch elderly women: the
Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 1999 02;30(2):357–362.
39. Feigin VL, Rodgers A. Ethnic disparities in risk factors for stroke: what
are the implications? Stroke. 2004;35(7):1568–1569.
40. Bonita R, Broad JB, Beaglehole R. Ethnic variations in stroke incidence
and case fatality: the Auckland Stroke study. Stroke. 1997;28:758–761.
41. Feigin V, Carter K, Hackett M, Barber PA, McNaughton H, Dyall L, et al.
Ethnic disparities in incidence of stroke subtypes: Auckland Regional
Community Stroke Study, 2002–2003. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(2):130–139.
42. Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a
review of the literature. Circulation. 1993 Oct;88(4:Pt 1):1973–1998.
43. Casper M, Wing S, Strogatz D, Davis CE, Tyroler HA. Antihypertensive
treatment and US trends in stroke mortality, 1962 to 1980. Am J Public
Health. 1992 Dec;82(12):1600–1606.
44. Anand SS, Yusuf S, Vuksan V, Devanesen S, Teo KK, Montague PA, et al.
Differences in risk factors, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease
between ethnic groups in Canada: the Study of Health Assessment and
Risk in Ethnic groups (SHARE). Lancet. 2000;356(9226):279–284.
45. Rose SB, Lawton BA, Elley CR, Dowell AC, Fenton AJ. The ‘Women’s
Lifestyle Study’, 2-year randomized controlled trial of physical activity
counselling in primary health care: rationale and study design. BMC
Public Health. 2007;7:166.
46. Seshadri S, Beiser A, Kelly-Hayes M, Kase CS, Au R, Kannel WB, et al.
The lifetime risk of stroke: estimates from the Framingham Study. Stroke.
2006;37(2):345–350.
47. Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, Gargano JW, Duncan PW,
Lynch G, et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical
presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurology. 2008
Oct;7(10):915–926.
48. Kapral MK, Fang J, Hill MD, Silver F, Richards J, Jaigobin C, et al. Sex
differences in stroke care and outcomes: results from the Registry of the
Canadian Stroke Network. Stroke. 2005 Apr;36(4):809–814.
49. Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terent A. Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a
systematic review. Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4): 1082–1090.
50. Feigin VL. [Climatologic aspect of the epidemiology of acute cerebral
circulatory disorders (review)]. Zhurnal Nevropatologii i Psikhiatrii
Imeni S S Korsakova. 1984;84(9):1406–1412.
51. The New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey. Methodology Report for the
2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey. Wellington: University of
Otago and Ministry of Health 2011.
52. Dyall L, Carter K, Bonita R, Anderson C, Feigin V, Kerse N, et al.
Incidence of stroke in women in Auckland, New Zealand. Ethnic trends
over two decades: 1981–2003. N ZMed J. 2006;119(1245):U2309.
53. Kerr AJ, Broad J, Wells S, Riddell T, Jackson R. Should the first priority
in cardiovascular risk management be those with prior cardiovascular
disease? Heart. 2009 Feb;95(2):125–129.
54. Chen L, Rogers SL, Colagiuri S, Cadilhac DA, Mathew TH, Boyden
AN, et al. How do the Australian guidelines for lipid-lowering drugs
perform in practice? Cardiovascular disease risk in the AusDiab Study,
1999-2000. Med J Aust. 2008 Sep;189(6):319–322.
55. Whisnant JP. Modeling of risk factors for ischemic stroke. The Willis
Lecture. Stroke. 1997 09;28(9):1840–1844.
25. Introduction
It is of great importance to identify the risk factors for stroke and
to what extent these different risk factors contribute to the general
as well as the individual risk burden for stroke. The term risk factor
has been used since the 1960s (1). A risk factor has been defined
as a factor (trait) associated with a pathological medical condition.
However, such an association is not sufficient to establish a factor
to be a risk factor. A specific trait may be seen in individuals after
disease onset but its occurrence does not prove that this caused the
disease. For example, if hypertension is often seen in stroke patients,
does this necessarily mean that hypertension is the cause of stroke,
or could possibly hypertension be the result of the stroke instead?
Because of this, prospective cohort studies are often needed to
identify risk factors. If a factor observed before stroke onset can be
related to stroke occurring later in life, this indicates that this factor
may indeed be a risk factor. However, some factors may be analysed
also after stroke onset without this caveat, especially factors that are
not influenced by the disease onset, e.g. gender and variations in the
human genome. An additional proof that a trait is actually a risk fac-
tor for stroke is if treatment of the trait leads to a reduced incidence
of stroke. The amount of influence a specific risk factor has on risk
is often measured as relative risk, odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio, and
population attributable risk (PAR) (Table 2.1).
PAR is the portion of risk for a disease caused by a specific factor.
The numerical value of the PAR indicates how much of the disease
that would be avoided if the risk factor could be completely elimi-
nated. Therefore it is related to absolute risk for a specific factor.
Interestingly, even though ischaemic heart disease (IHD), stroke,
and peripheral artery disease are all arterial diseases, the impor-
tance of risk factors influencing these conditions seem to vary.
Thus hypertension is most important for stroke whereas lipid
alterations seem to be more important for myocardial infarction
(Figure 2.1) (4).
Risk factors for ischaemic arterial
cerebrovascular disease
Non-modifiable factors
Birth weight
Low birth weight is reported to be associated with increased stroke
risk in adult life (5). Even after adjustment for childhood socioeco-
nomic factors the risk of vascular disease in adulthood may remain
(6). A relation between low birth weight and higher blood pres-
sure (BP) in adults has been observed (7). The relation between low
birth weight and stroke may be more pronounced for haemorrhagic
stroke (8). It could be suggested that the birth weight is, from a pop-
ulation perspective, a modifiable risk factor if taking the nutritional
situation of the mother during pregnancy into account.
Gender
Male gender increases the risk for ischaemic stroke (9, 10). The risk
of stroke for men is about 1.3 times as high as for women at a given
age except in the highest ages (Figure 2.2). However, this gender
difference is less evident when taking the number of risk factors in
each individual into account (11). Early menopause has been asso-
ciated with increased stroke risk (12) and after menopause several
vascular risk factors become more prevalent in women (10). The
difference in risk between the genders seems to disappear in high
age over 80–85 years of age (9). The gender risk is different for suba-
rachnoid haemorrhage where the risk is higher for women (13).
Age
Stroke incidence increases markedly with age (Figure 2.2)
(9, 14, 15). This steep increase in stroke incidence by age is observed
in both men and women. In the OXVASC study, the rate of stroke
increased from 1.76 per 1000 individuals per year for individu-
als aged 55–64 years to 16.47 for those aged 85 or more (14). The
increased incidence with age is seen for ischaemic stroke (16) as
Risk factors
Arne Lindgren
CHAPTER 2
Table 2.1 Different terms used for describing influence of risk. For
details, see (2, 3)
Term Definition
Absolute risk Risk in absolute number, e.g. if the risk is 1/100 for stroke
if the person has a trait and 1/200 if the person does not
have the trait
Relative risk Relative comparison between two situations, e.g. if the
risk is 1/100 for the person with the trait and 1/200 for the
person without the train—then the relative risk is 2
Odds ratio Used in, e.g. retrospective case–control studies to
estimate relative risk. Calculated as the odds of having
a disease if having the trait divided by the odds of not
having the disease if having the trait
Hazard ratio Used for comparing survival in two different groups
during a specific studied time period. The observed
number divided by expected number in group 1 is
compared (divided) by the observed number divided by
expected number in group 2
Population
attributable risk
Proportion of risk for a disease caused by a specific factor.
Indicates how much of the disease that could be avoided
if the risk factor was not present
26. oxford textbook of stroke and cerebrovascular disease
10
well as for intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (17) and also to some
extent for subarachnoid haemorrhage (18). The risk of stroke more
than doubles with each decade of increased age after 55 years of age
at least up to age 84 (16, 19, 20). Also after age 84, the stroke risk
continues to increase (19).
Ethnicity
There are considerable variations in stroke incidence between dif-
ferent ethnic groups. People of African origin have a higher risk
of all stroke types compared with Caucasians. This risk is at least
1.2 times higher and even higher for ICH (21). It is possible that
this can in part be explained by poorer management of treatable
risk factors. The proportion of ICH is higher (about 28%) among
Chinese than among Caucasians (22). This increased proportion
may remain also after emigration to Western countries; in one
study 24% of reported strokes were of haemorrhagic type (23). It
has also been reported that in ischaemic stroke, the prevalence of
intracranial artery stenosis is more frequent in East Asians (24,
25) and African Americans (26) than in Caucasians.
Familiar/genetic causes (specific or polygenetic)
Even after accounting for all established risk factors there seems to
be an increased risk of stroke among some families. This and other
observations have led to the conclusion that some inherited factors
may contribute to the risk of stroke. The heritability of ischaemic
stroke when using genome-wide association study data has been
calculated as 37.9% overall, ranging from 40.3% for large ves-
sel disease to 32.6% for cardioembolic and 16.1% for small vessel
disease (27).
Several rare stroke syndromes have been associated with mono-
genetic variations, e.g. CADASIL (cerebral autosomal dominant
arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leucoencephalopathy;
NOTCH3 gene) (28), CARASIL (cerebral autosomal recessive
arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leucoencephalopathy;
HTRA gene), MELAS (mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy,
lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes; mitochondrial disease),
HERNS (hereditary endotheliopathy with retinopathy, nephropa-
thy, and stroke; TREX1 gene), homocystinuria, Fabry disease
(alpha galactosidase gene), Ehlers–Danlos syndrome type IV,
Marfan syndrome, pseudoxanthoma elasticum, HANAC (heredi-
tary angiopathy, nephropathy, aneurysm, and muscle cramps syn-
drome; COL4A1 mutation), and other syndromes (29). Typically
these syndromes include stroke or stroke-like episodes as only one
of several different clinical manifestations of the syndrome in ques-
tion. It should be emphasized that in some cases stroke is the pre-
senting symptom before other symptoms that indicate the specific
syndrome are seen. For details, please see Chapter 14.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) increases the risk of stroke in childhood
with a prevalence of cerebral infarct of 11% at the age of 20 years (30).
SCD children with increased transcranial Doppler ultrasound veloci-
ties of the middle cerebral arteries have a particularly high risk. At
ages 20–30 years these patients also have a risk of cerebral haemor-
rhage (30). Cerebral infarcts have also been reported in other related
genetic haemoglobin variations though at a lower rate compared with
SCD (30). Additional details on SCD are provided in Chapter 14.
The common stroke phenotypes have been more difficult
to relate to specific genetic variations. However, there are now
reports emerging that certain common genotypes, especially
single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variations, are associated
with increased risk of intermediate phenotypes that subsequently
increase the risk of stroke. Such intermediate phenotypes that may
be genetically influenced include hypertension, diabetes mellitus,
and heart disease. One example is atrial fibrillation (AF) that has
been shown to be related to genetic variations and specific types of
ischaemic stroke. AF has in genome-wide association studies been
related to SNPs in the PITX gene, the ZHFX3 gene, and the KCNN3
gene (31).
There are also reports of genetic variations that seem to be more
directly related to common subtypes of ischaemic stroke. Typically
these reports have included large international collaborations such
as the International Stroke Genetics Consortium. SNP variations
in the chromosome 9p21 region have been related to ischaemic
stroke (32), and these associations seem more evident for the large
vessel type of stroke (33). Recently, a new SNP in HDAC9 on chro-
mosome 7p21.1 was associated with large vessel ischaemic stroke
(34). Very recently another study reported a locus on chromosome
6p21.1 related to the ischaemic stroke subtype large artery athero-
sclerosis (35). The Metastroke collaboration was able to confirm
several of these findings (36). Also for ICH there have been reports
on genetic associations. The APOE ε2 and ε4 alleles are mostly
related to lobar ICH and likely amyloid angiopathy whereas ε4
is also, although not with the same high degree of significance,
related to deep ICH (37).
Hypertension
Myocardial infarction
Stroke
0
10
20
30
Per
cent
PAR
40
50
60
Smoking
Main modifiable risk factors
Diabetes ApoB/ApoA1 ratio
Fig. 2.1 Degree of influence of some risk factors for stroke and myocardial
infarction. (Endres M, Heuschmann PU, Laufs U, Hakim AM. Primary prevention of
stroke: Blood pressure, lipids, and heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:545–552)
55–59
0
5
10
15
10-Year
probability
of
stroke/100
20
25
Men
Women
60–64 65–69
Age, years
70–74 75–79 80–84
Fig. 2.2 Average 10-year probability of stroke according to age in men and women
per 100 (%). (Wolf PA, Belanger AJ, D’Agostino RB. Quantifying stroke risk factors
and potentials for risk reduction. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1993;3(Suppl 1):7–14.)
27. CHAPTER 2 risk factors 11
Other diseases and measurable traits
Hypertension
Hypertension is the most important treatable risk factor for stroke
(4). History of hypertension increases the OR to 2.6 for stroke and
has a PAR of 35% (38). The individual relative risk for stroke in
hypertensives may be higher—up to 8 in a group of individuals
with a mean age of 47 years to develop a stroke during a 10-year
follow-up period (39). Hypertension is commonly detected among
stroke patients under 55 years of age (40, 41). Hypertension remains
to be a stroke risk factor in the elderly and also at ages over 60 is it
useful to treat hypertension to prevent stroke (42). At even higher
ages the importance of hypertension as a stroke risk factor is some-
what more difficult to assess because the prevalence of hypertension
is so high in these age groups (43). However, hypertension treat-
ment seems to reduce stroke risk also in the very elderly, indicating
that it is also important to control BP among these individuals (44).
Both systolic (Figure 2.3) (45) and diastolic (46) BP is of impor-
tance for stroke risk. Not only hypertension but also BP within the
normal range may be a risk factor for stroke. There is no thresh-
old for BP—also rather normal BP levels carry an increased risk of
stroke (47) and a considerable proportion of strokes occur among
people with high–normal BP or ‘mild’ hypertension (45).
A systolic BP increase of 20 mmHg or a diastolic BP increase of
10 mmHg more than doubles the risk of stroke death (47).
Not only may the BP measured at a certain time be related to
stroke risk, it has been suggested that BP variability and episodic
hypertension may increase the stroke risk (48). This may have impli-
cations for how BP will be measured and evaluated in the future
and also influence which antihypertensive drugs are preferred.
Stroke/transient ischaemic attack
A previous stroke is a powerful risk factor of a new stroke. The
risk of a new stroke varies considerably depending on the patho-
genetic mechanism of the first stroke and on the simultaneous
presence of other risk factors. A risk of about 9% during an aver-
age follow-up of 2.5 years, i.e. about 3.6% per year, was reported
in the PROFESS trial which included patients with a mean age of
66 years (49).
Also, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) indicates an increased
the risk for a subsequent stroke both in the short term and long
term. In one study, the risk of stroke within 90 days of a TIA was
on average 10.5% but depended on the characteristics of the TIA
with higher risk among those with a TIA with weakness or speech
impairment, diabetes mellitus, age over 60 years, or longer TIA
duration (50).
Silent cerebral infarcts/white matter disease
Presence of silent cerebral infarcts increases the stroke risk by at
least two to three times independently of other vascular risk fac-
tors (51, 52). Both periventricular and subcortical white matter
hyperintensities also increase the risk of subsequent stroke, inde-
pendently of the presence of silent brain infarcts (52).
Atrial fibrillation
AF is a powerful risk factor for stroke. The abnormal contractions
of the atrium of the heart lead to non-laminar blood flow in the left
atrium. The blood flow in the left atrial appendage also becomes
disturbed and the general opinion is that the blood clots in AF usu-
ally develop in the left atrial appendage. Fragments of or the whole
clot then detach from the left atrial appendage and embolize to the
cerebral arteries or other parts of the arterial system.
The risk for stroke depends on whether other factors are present
simultaneously with the AF. The often used CHADS2 score (one
point for each of: congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75,
diabetes; and 2 points for stroke or TIA) is a useful method to
estimate stroke risk in patients with AF. With none of the factors
mentioned in CHADS2, the yearly risk of stroke in patients is on
average 1.9%, with one factor present the risk is about 2.8%, and
with all factors present the yearly risk is on average 18.2% (53, 54).
The more recently developed CHA2DS2-VASc may be even more
precise in determining stroke risk in AF patients (Table 2.2).
Other cardiac conditions including patent foramen ovale
There are many heart conditions that have been suggested to be
associated with increased stroke risk (see Table 2.3). Some of these
conditions are well established, e.g. AF (see ‘Atrial fibrillation’ sec-
tion above), mitral valve stenosis, acute anterior transmural myo-
cardial infarct, atrial myxoma, mechanical heart valve prosthesis
in the mitral or aortal position, whereas other are considered more
equivocal regarding stroke risk. The latter include patent foramen
ovale (PFO), atrial septal aneurysm, mitral annulus calcifications,
and others (55).
A PFO is a remaining connection between the right and left
atrium of the heart. If the connection is larger and not having over-
lapping structures functioning as a valve the condition is instead
an atrial septal defect. In both cases there is a theoretical possibil-
ity that a venous thrombus travelling as an embolus in the venous
system to the heart may pass directly from the right atrium on the
venous side of the heart directly to the left atrium on the arterial
side of the heart and then continue to travel out into the arterial
system. Another possibility that has been proposed is that a throm-
bus may form in situ in the channel that often constitutes the PFO
and then detach as an embolus. The relation between PFO and the
risk of ischaemic stroke has been debated. PFO is often present in
the general population at a rate of about 20–25%. Therefore there is
a possibility that the PFO is just a coincident finding in the stroke
patient. However, some reports have indicated that among young
patients with cryptogenic ischaemic stroke, PFO may be seen more
100
0
5
10
15 0
3 11
17
18
16
11
8
8 8
20
25
120 140
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
160 180 200
0
10
20
Stroke
mortality/1000
person-years
Population
distribution
(%)
30
40
50
Fig. 2.3 Influence of systolic BP on stroke mortality. (Marmot MG, Poulter NR.
Primary prevention of stroke. Lancet. 1992;339:344–347.)
28. oxford textbook of stroke and cerebrovascular disease
12
often than in the general population (56). It has also been discussed
that the size of the PFO and a concomitant atrial septal aneurysm
(defined as hypermobile part of the septum between the right and
left atrium) may increase the risk of stroke (57).
Lipid changes
Serum lipid levels do not play such an important risk factor role
for ischaemic stroke as for IHD (20, 58). Even so, increased choles-
terol levels are related to ischaemic stroke risk, although this may
differ between different pathogenetic subtypes of ischaemic stroke
(58). Cholesterol levels are associated with carotid artery athero-
sclerosis (59) and it is therefore likely that cerebral infarcts caused
by large vessel disease are more clearly related to increased choles-
terol levels. Conversely, reports indicate that low cholesterol levels
may increase the risk of ICH (60, 61) and observations have related
intense lowering of cholesterol levels in stroke patients to a slightly
increased risk of ICH (62). The situation regarding triglyceride lev-
els and risk of stroke is unclear (20).
Coagulation disorders
Antiphospholipid antibodies including anticardiolipin antibod-
ies and lupus anticoagulant have been associated with ischaemic
stroke. Even though the situation is complex with different assays
and cut-off levels used, there is probably an increased stroke risk
for patients with high levels of these antibodies (63). Several other
coagulation disorders are associated with increased risk of venous
thrombosis, but it is much less clear how these affect the arterial
situation (63). It is possible that in some situations a coagulation
disorder causing a venous thrombosis may give rise to paradoxical
embolism through a PFO.
Homocysteine
Increasedhomocysteinelevelshavebeenobservedinstrokepatients
(64). Even so, the importance of increased homocysteine levels for
stroke risk has been debated. Two reasons for this are: (i) that the
situation is complicated by the relation between homocysteine
levels and other vascular risk factors, e.g. age and decreased renal
function, both of which in their turn influence stroke risk; and (ii)
that studies have been unable to clearly demonstrate that homo-
cysteine lowering therapy decreases stroke risk (65).
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes mellitus has a deteriorating effect on arterial blood ves-
sels and is a risk factor for ischaemic stroke. The relative risk of
ischaemic stroke for diabetic individuals has been estimated to be
between 1.3 and 6 (20, 66). Diabetes also increases the risk of stroke
recurrence (66). Lacunar infarcts may be more common in diabetic
patients (67) although this has not always been reported (68). The
effect of diabetes may in part be mediated by other risk factors such
as hypertension and lipid alterations and it is also possible that
these and other risk factors such as smoking potentiate each other.
Migraine
The relation between migraine and stroke is complex (69). Migraine
and ischaemic stroke often occur in the same patients. Migraine-like
symptoms may indicate another underlying disease that may cause
a stroke, e.g. arteriovenous malformation, arterial dissection,
CADASIL, MELAS, encephalitis, or even atherosclerosis. It is also
of interest that migraine has been related to increased prevalence
of white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging.
However, also in patients without migraine caused by another dis-
ease, there seems to be an increased risk of stroke, and the risk is
higher for patients with migraine with aura compared with patients
with migraine without aura. The risk of stroke in migraineurs may
be higher in women than in men (70). The increased risk among
individuals with migraine with aura has been reported to represent
a relative risk of 2.27 (71). However, the individual risk in younger
patients who report migraine with aura, e.g. under 45 years of age,
is still low due to the low overall stroke incidence in younger ages.
Migraine as a risk factor for stroke seems to interact with other risk
factors such as smoking and use of oral contraceptives. The cerebral
infarct supposed to be caused by migraine with aura has symptoms
similar to those experienced in the aura phase. It has been sug-
gested that a pronounced cortical spreading depression may cause
local ischaemia so profound that an infarct develops. Other the-
ories have included that the increased prevalence of PFO among
Table 2.2 CHA2DS2VASc score and risk of stroke in patients with AF.
Risk factor-based approach expressed as a point based scoring system,
with the acronym CHA2DS2–VASc
(Note: maximum score is 9 since age may contribute 0, 1, or 2 points)
Risk factor Score
Congestive heart failure/LV dysfunction 1
Hypertension 1
Age ≥ 75 2
Diabetes mellitus 1
Stroke/TIA/thrombo-embolism 2
Vascular diseasea 1
Age 65–74 1
Sex category (i.e. female sex) 1
Maximum score 9
Adjusted stroke rate according to CHA2DS2– VASc score
CHA2DS2 –VASc score Patients
(n = 7329)
Adjusted stroke
rate (%/year)b
0 1 0%
1 422 1.3%
2 1230 2.2%
3 1730 3.2%
4 1718 4.0%
5 1159 6.7%
6 679 9.8%
7 294 9.6%
8 82 6.7%
9 14 15.2%
a. Prior myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, aortic plaque. Actual rates of
stroke in contemporary cohorts may vary from these estimates. b. Based on Lip et al.
Stroke. 2010;41:2731–2738. LV = left ventricular. Reproduced from Camm AJ, Kirchhof
P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial
fibrillation: The task force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the European
Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2369–2429, with permission.
29. CHAPTER 2 risk factors 13
patients with migraine with aura is a possible mechanism for the
increased risk of stroke in these patients. However, this has been
questioned and it is possible that this is only an epiphenomen, i.e.
that migraine with aura and PFO coexist in the same patients with-
out any additional combined mutual influence on stroke risk. For a
detailed, up-to date overview about migraine and stroke, please see
reference (69).
Infection
Inflammation measured as, e.g. C-reactive protein or fibrinogen
levels, seem to increase the risk of stroke (72). Acute or chronic
infections that precede stroke onset and cause an increased stroke
risk may at least in part be mediated by inflammation (73). Chronic
infections suggested to be related to stroke include agents such as
Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, Cytomegalovirus, her-
pes simplex virus (HSV)-1, and HSV-2 even though the effect is
perhaps more mediated by a ‘total burden’ of infections rather than
a single agent (72). Periodontitis has also been related to stroke risk
(74).ItseemsclearthatChagasdiseasecausesincreasedriskofstroke
(75). Acute infection, e.g. respiratory or urinary tract infection, may
precede stroke onset and indicate increased stroke risk (73).
Obstructive sleep apnoea
Even though obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) may increase BP and
be related to obesity, there seems to be an independent stroke risk
related to OSA per se (76). Suggested possible mechanisms include
hypercoagubility, atherosclerosis, decreased cerebral blood flow,
and paradoxical embolization (76). Interestingly, wake-up stroke
has recently been linked to OSA (77).
Renal disease
Renal dysfunction increases the risk of stroke in individuals with
known atherothrombotic disease (78). Microalbuminuria has been
independently associated with stroke risk (79).
Arterial diseases
Carotid artery stenosis or occlusion is a well-known risk factor for
stroke. There is a risk in individuals with asymptomatic carotid
artery stenosis (80, 81) but the risk is considerably higher in patients
with a symptomatic high-degree stenosis (81–83).
Aortic plaques are independent risk factors for stroke and severe
aortic arch plaques have been reported to confer a risk of cerebral
infarct of 10% or more in 1 year (84). Patients with asymptomatic
or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease have an increased risk
of stroke (85, 86). In addition, carotid artery disease is more fre-
quently seen in patients with peripheral artery disease (85).
Several diseases with microangiopathy of the brain (87, 88) and
sometimes simultaneous vascular involvement of other organs
(some with, some without clinical symptoms from other organs
than the brain) are related to stroke risk, e.g. CADASIL (28, 89),
CARASIL (90), HERNS (91), HANAC (92), HSA (hereditary sys-
temic angiopathy) (93), Fabry disease (94), polyarteritis nodosa
(95), and other syndromes.
Other diseases
Several factors that are more uncommon in the general population
are also related to stroke risk. These factors include inflammatory
disease, e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, haematological disorders,
cancer, and different medical or surgical procedures. Please see
separate chapters in this book regarding these conditions.
Lifestyle risk factors
Several lifestyle risk factors have been related to stroke risk. A com-
prehensive review on this topic with both tables of relative risk
and information on PAR has been given by Chiuve et al. (96). The
Royal College of Physicians has provided tables of evidence that
include aspects on life style factors (<http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/
sites/default/files/documents/stroke_evidence_tables_2008.pdf>,
accessed 29 Oct 2013). It is of special interest that some factors have
been reported as acute triggers of stroke onset (97). The following
sections give a more detailed description of lifestyle and stroke risk.
Smoking
Cigarette smoking approximately doubles the risk for ischaemic
stroke (38, 98–100). The situation for ICH is less clear but here smok-
ing may also indicate an increased risk (96). There is an even more
pronounced relation between cigarette smoking and risk for suba-
rachnoid haemorrhage (101). Also, passive smoking carries a risk for
stroke (98). Smoking potentiates the effect of other risk factors (20).
Cigarette smoking is associated with an increased risk of atheroscle-
rosis as well as with the risk of thrombus formation. Individuals who
stop smoking reduce their risk of stroke (96, 100) by up to 50% (100).
Alcohol
Excessive alcohol consumption increases the risk of stroke.
Moreover, individuals who do not use any alcohol may have a
slightly increased risk (96), and a J-shaped curve for stroke risk
regarding alcohol consumption has been suggested (20). It is pos-
sible that temporary heavy alcohol consumption increases the risk
of immediate stroke (97).
Drug abuse
Drug abuse can cause stroke due to several pathogenetic mecha-
nisms.Intravenousinjectionofadrugmaybeaccompaniedbyother
agents such as air or talcum powder with subsequent embolization.
Table 2.3 Cardiac changes with possible relation to
thromboembolic risk
Major potential sources Minor potential sources
Atrial fibrillation Patent foramen ovale
Recent (<3 months) myocardial infarct Atrial septal aneurysm
Thrombus left atrium or ventricle Mitral valve prolapse
Dilating cardiomyopathy (EF ≤35 %) Severe mitral annulus calcification
Mitral stenosis Calcific aortic stenosis
Myxoma Spontaneous echo contrast in left
atrium on echocardiography
Mechanical prosthetic valve Other (e.g. hypokinetic left
ventricular segment, bioprosthetic
valve, mitral valve strands)
Infective endocarditis
Marantic endocarditis
Protruding aortic plaque
Major potential source: causal relation probable. Minor potential source: sometimes
over represented in stroke studies but no certain causal relation. EF = ejection fraction.
Modified from reference (55).
30. oxford textbook of stroke and cerebrovascular disease
14
Drugs or other agents administered simultaneously may cause vas-
culitis due to toxic or hypersensitivity reaction. Infectious agents
may be injected due to non-sterile conditions and cause, e.g. infec-
tive endocarditis with subsequent cerebral embolization. The use
of drugs may also unmask other pre-existing lesions such as arte-
rial aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, and tumours. Drugs
increasing sympathetic activity such as amphetamine can cause
acute BP elevation with subsequent ICH (102). Cocaine is a potent
vasoconstrictor agent. Cocaine abuse has been related to both cer-
ebral infarct and ICH (102). There are case reports of stroke related
to cannabis use but a clear causative risk still remains unsettled
(103). It should be mentioned that sympathomimetics and other
vasoactive drugs including cannabis, cocaine, and amphetamine—
as well as conventional medications with vasoactive effects—have
also been associated with the reversible cerebral vasoconstriction
syndrome (104).
Obesity
A body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 or more in men and 30 kg/ m2
or more in women increases the risk of ischaemic stroke, whereas
the risk for ICH does not necessarily increase by BMI increase
(96). As an example, a BMI of 30.0–31.9 kg/m2 in women and of
25.0–29.9 kg/m2 in men carry a relative risk of 1.44 and 1.43 for
ischaemic stroke, respectively. Waist:hip ratio has also been related
to increased stroke risk, even after adjustment for BMI (105).
Physical activity
Physical activity decreases the risk of stroke compared with
no physical activity (106). Daily exercise of at least 30 minutes
decreases the relative risk of stroke to between 0.69 and 0.74 (96).
Physical activity of at least 30 minutes three to five times per week
has been recommended (107).
Diet
There are many components in diet and it is unclear how these
influence stroke risk. Excessive salt intake is related to higher BP
(108). Several diets have been related to lower stroke risk. The
Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)-based diet score is based
on intake of trans fat, ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fat,
ratio of chicken and fish to red meat, fruits, vegetables, soy, nuts,
cereal fibre, and multivitamin use and has been related to lower
risk of stroke in women (96). Fruit and vegetables may have a pro-
tective effect against both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke: one
meta-analysis reported that individuals eating three to five servings
per day had a relative risk of stroke of 0.89 compared with those
consuming less fruit and vegetables (109). Fish consumption may
also decrease the risk of stroke (110).
Hormone therapy (especially oral contraceptives and
hormone replacement therapy)
Oral contraceptive use may confer a slightly elevated risk of ischae-
mic stroke (111). The results have been debated and questions such
as influence on stroke risk by oestrogen dose are not clearly under-
stood (20). However, it seems that oral contraceptive use increases
the ischaemic stroke risk in females with simultaneous other stroke
risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, older
age, and hypercholesterolemia (20, 112). The situation regarding
risk of ICH is less clear.
Hormone replacement therapy has been related to increased
risk of stroke with a relative risk of 1.29 (113). It is possible that
transdermal oestrogen hormone replacement therapy carries a
lower risk of stroke compared to oral oestrogens and further stud-
ies are ongoing (10).
Other drugs with hormone-like actions such as tamoxifen have
also been reported to increase stroke risk (114). One review linked
tamoxifen to thromboembolic events but not significantly to stroke
risk(115).Thestrokeriskmaybelimitedtotheactivetamoxifentreat-
ment period and then decrease in the post-treatment period (116).
Stress
Self-perceived psychological stress has been associated with
increased stroke risk (117) and individuals experiencing major life
events have a dose–response relationship with stroke risk (118).
These studies mostly refer to an increased risk in the longer per-
spective, but it is possible that psychological stress may be a trigger
for stroke onset (97). Both negative emotions and anger seem to
be more common during the last 2 hours before stroke onset than
during the preceding day or year (119).
Socioeconomic factors
Both comparisons within countries and between countries indicate
that low socioeconomic status is associated with increased stroke
risk (120). In addition, the deficit after stroke tends to be more
severe as well as the mortality ratio in stroke patients with lower
socioeconomic status. Even though lower socioeconomic status
is related to higher frequency of other stroke risk factors such as
hypertension and physical activity, this may not be the only expla-
nation why these individuals have an increased risk. The impact of
socioeconomic status may vary by age, e.g. in one study there was
a clearer association for men 40–59 years old compared to older
men (121).
Interaction between different risk factors
Many individuals have more than one stroke risk factor and it
is then difficult to assess how important each risk factor is. This
important area is complex and it is often difficult to use different
suggested score systems to evaluate how much different risk fac-
tors potentiate each other (see Chapter 23 regarding these issues).
When considering secondary prevention it is also very important
to consider the interaction between different risk factors.
Risk factors for intracerebral haemorrhage
Some risk factors for ICH have been discussed previously in this
chapter. Hypertension and higher age are risk factors for ICH
(17, 60, 123). Other risk factors include African American rather
than Caucasian ethnicity and lower cholesterol or low-density
lipoprotein-cholesterol levels (21, 60, 61). Frequent alcohol use and
diabetes mellitus have been related to ICH (123, 124). Results regard-
ing the influence of triglyceride levels have been equivocal (60, 123).
Genetic factors and cerebral amyloid angiopathy are also of impor-
tance (see earlier in this chapter). The risk factors for ICH seem to
have varying impact depending on whether the ICH is lobar or deep
(124). The risk of ICH increases in patients using antiplatelet or anti-
coagulant medications. Cerebral microbleeds are more often seen in
ICH patients than in ischaemic stroke/TIA patients (125). Please see
Chapter 5 regarding further discussion on risk factors for ICH.
Risk factors for subarachnoid haemorrhage
Risk factors for subarachnoid haemorrhage are somewhat different
than for ischaemic stroke. However, smoking and hypertension are