SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
ARMY AVIATION Magazine 42 February 29, 2016
Since our last TCM-RA update,
we continue to work to get the
requirements “right” within the Avia-
tion attack/recon portfolio. A seem-
ingly straight-forward premise, there
are many contributing factors that
make this fundamental objective more
challenging. Factors include continu-
ously changing conditions, the result
of rapidly evolving threats, competing
priorities, and fiscal realities impact-
ing both current readiness and future
capability development. We focus our
efforts linking strategic guidance and
doctrine to various requirements docu-
ments in order to close gaps in mobil-
ity, survivability, and lethality. By doing
so, the requirements we codify through
the Joint Capabilities Integration and
Development System (JCIDS) will
remain operationally relevant within
our three main lines of effort (LOEs)
– weapon/munitions, attack, and re-
connaissance capabilities.The end state
is to increase Army Aviation’s contri-
bution into unified land operations by
delivering capabilities (in the form of
both material and non-material solu-
tions) to more effectively conduct air-
ground operations (AGO) consistent
with FM 3-04 Army Aviation.
	 We are leveraging opportunities,
created by continuously changing con-
ditions, to correctly set requirements
within our main 3 LOEs – weapon/
munitions, attack, and reconnaissance.
Starting with weapons, we are drafting
a comprehensive and holistic lethality/
munitions strategy that will align efforts
across the Aviation enterprise. This is a
significant endeavor and we are incor-
porating stakeholders throughout U.S.
Army Aviation Center of Excellence
(USAACE), the Army Staff, and re-
spective program managers – Joint At-
tack Munition Systems (JAMS), Un-
manned Aircraft Systems (UAS), and
Apache – aiming toward three ends:
1. Improve lethality against sophisti-
cated threat armor including passive
and active countermeasures (CM);
2. Provide more air-to-ground weapon
options (scalable and tailorable based
on targets);
3. Right-size the munition mix/inven-
tory supported by the Total Army Mu-
nition Requirements (TAMR) analysis.
Weapon/Munitions
	 The underpinnings of the lethality/
munitions strategy are three-fold: the
emerging Aviation training strategy/
gunnery qualification standards com-
bined with ongoing TAMR analysis
forming the ways; and resourcing in
the Program Objective Memorandum
(POM) and Long-Range Investment
Analysis (LIRA) funding documents
providing the means. This strategy will
balance necessary operational capabili-
ties with associated funding, creating
trade space and remaining cost neutral
within the Aviation portfolio. Addi-
tions over the next 3-5 years include
both the “Romeo” model Hellfire (R-
HF) that effectively combines separate
capabilities currently found in several
HF variants. Additionally, the Joint
Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) will
provide a dual-mode seeker (laser and
radar guidance) in one missile deliver-
ing improved lethality against threat
armored systems that are protected
with passive and active CM. Stake-
holders are working to fully integrate
the R-HF and JAGM (Initial Opera-
tional Capability in FY19) on both the
AH-64E and MQ-1C Gray Eagle.
	 In the short term, we are collaborat-
ing to field a limited quantity of laser-
guided 2.75”Hydra rockets providing a
smaller, precision-guided, complimen-
tary capability for use against suitable
soft-skin/light targets. Looking ahead
to the mid/long term, we will explore
possibilities of a Small Guided Muni-
tion (SGM) that is both scalable and
tailorable. The SGM could potentially
provide both a drop glide and forward
firing munition with modular seeker
(guidance) and programmable warhead
sections adding selectable options for
Army Aviation to employ from both
manned attack/reconnaissance rotary-
wing helicopters and unmanned plat-
forms. Current JCIDS efforts include
the recently updated JAGM Capability
Development Document (CDD), the
Special Focus u TRADOC Capability Manager Updates
A team of 1-229 ARB AH-64Es conducts training
at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), WA.
If you don’t like change,
you’ll like irrelevance
even less.
– General Eric K. Shinseki, former
Chief of Staff, U.S. Army
Working to Get
Requirements Right
By COL Jeffrey W. White
U.S.ARMYPHOTOBYCW3JOSEPHC.WANKELMAN,1-229THARB
TRADOC Capability Manager for
Reconnaissance & Attack (TCM-RA)
ARMY AVIATION Magazine 43 February 29, 2016
initial drafting of the JAGM Capabil-
ity Production Document (CPD), and
revising/updating the 2005 Advanced
Precision Kill Weapon System (APK-
WS) Operational Requirements Docu-
ment (ORD) to ensure we capture all
current required weapons/munitions
capabilities, contingent on senior lead-
er approval of this strategy.
Attack
	 Shifting to the attack LOE, the
AH-64E Version 6 (v6) is the final
set of capability insertions completing
E-model production. Material devel-
opers and industry partners are sched-
uled to field the AH-64E v6 to the
operational force beginning in FY19.
This latest attack helicopter variant
adds critical capabilities identified as
threshold requirements in the AH-
64E v6 Capability Production Docu-
ment (CPD). Capabilities include sen-
sor, mission command, weapon, and
aircraft performance enhancements.
The AH-64E v6 leverages technology
improvements, addresses obsolescence
issues in older AH-64D/E versions,
and enables Army Aviation to conduct
doctrinal attack, reconnaissance, move-
ment to contact, and security missions
across the full spectrum of military
operations. Additionally, AH-64E v6
equipped units enhance the ability to
execute Joint Combined Arms Opera-
tions, supporting commanders across
multiple domains (land, air, and sea).
	 Consistent with strategic guidance,
doctrine, and the Aviation Restructur-
ing Initiative (ARI), the AH-64E v6
delivers capabilities to perform across
multiple domains while mitigating
the armed reconnaissance gap created
as the Army divests all OH-58D Ki-
owa Warriors. Teamed with UAS, the
AH-64E v6 will greatly improve the
ability resident in each Attack/Recon-
naissance Battalion (ARB) and Heavy-
Attack Reconnaissance Squadron (H-
ARS) to conduct Manned-Unmanned
Teaming (MUM-T). The AH-64E v6
will be capable of leveraging Army and
Joint assets to acquire, positively iden-
tify (PID), and facilitate clearance of
fires to execute missions either autono-
mously (on-board sensors and weap-
ons) or employ MUM-T (integrated
maneuver with UAS) – further increas-
ing the ability to develop the situation,
gain/maintain enemy contact, while
enhancing survivability, fires, and mis-
sion command. These capabilities are
essential to maintain an asymmetric
advantage over increasingly more capa-
ble threats by maintaining overmatch
and functioning as part of the Army
Operating Concept (AOC). The AH-
64E will continue to be an essential
part of Army Aviation, providing core
attack and reconnaissance capabilities
through the long-term.
Reconnaissance
	 Finally as part of the Recon LOE,
we continue to support the divestiture
of all OH-58 variants while exploring
options to mitigate the validated aerial
reconnaissance and security gap. OH-
58 A/C/D divestiture will continue
through FY19 as we work to synchro-
nize fielding of AH-64E and MQ-1C
as part of each ARB along with AH-
64E and RQ-7B Shadows resident in
each H-ARS as described in FM 3-04.
We remain partnered with Future Verti-
cal Lift (FVL) stakeholders to validate
and prioritize necessary armed recon-
naissance rotary-wing attributes. These
attributes will guide various efforts –
including modeling, simulation, and
Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) studies –
as we develop/update necessary require-
ments documents to accurately describe
required capabilities for both material
and non-material solutions.
	 TCM-RA,in concert with members
of the Aviation Enterprise, focuses ef-
forts on getting the attack/reconnais-
sance and supporting system require-
ments right. This is a collaborative
process involving stakeholders in the
operational force, institutional Army,
material developers, and industry part-
ners alike. Our methodology involves
linking strategic guidance and doctrine
to developing operationally relevant
requirements while considering ad-
ditional factors such as continuously
changing threat, budgetary, and op-
erational environment conditions. This
process is complicated but essential to
deliver the right weapon/munition, at-
tack, and reconnaissance capabilities
now and in the future. By doing so,
Army Aviation will remain an enabler
of unified land operations, capable of
conducting effective AGO, adding to
the legacy of our Branch by continuing
to provide crucial aviation support to
those in need.
COL Jeffrey W. White is the U.S. Army
Training and Doctrine Command Ca-
pability Manager for Reconnaissance
and Attack, with the U.S. Army Aviation
Center of Excellence at Fort Rucker, AL.
iPhone/iPad App Android App
iTunes App Store Google Play
Summit
App
16SUMMIT
Free Download
Sponsored by
____________________
For all other devices, go to
chirpe.com/16Summit
2016 Army Aviation
Mission Solutions Summit
Sponsored by
Army Aviation
Association of America
With the app, you can:
· Search for exhibitors
· Review the schedule
· View the floor plan
· Create a daily schedule
· Receive event alerts

More Related Content

What's hot

Gutierrez_Resume_June_2015
Gutierrez_Resume_June_2015Gutierrez_Resume_June_2015
Gutierrez_Resume_June_2015Eric Gutierrez
 
Reliability Analysis of a Fleet of Transportation Vehicles
Reliability Analysis of a Fleet of Transportation VehiclesReliability Analysis of a Fleet of Transportation Vehicles
Reliability Analysis of a Fleet of Transportation Vehiclesrdx313
 
Leete_MasterResume
Leete_MasterResumeLeete_MasterResume
Leete_MasterResumeJosh Leete
 
Supply Systems Analyst Government Resume
Supply Systems Analyst Government ResumeSupply Systems Analyst Government Resume
Supply Systems Analyst Government ResumeDanielle Walters
 
E. mamajek resume
E. mamajek resumeE. mamajek resume
E. mamajek resumeslevine407
 
Joint Service Transcrips AS2 Boschma
Joint Service Transcrips AS2 BoschmaJoint Service Transcrips AS2 Boschma
Joint Service Transcrips AS2 BoschmaAlex Boschma
 
Infantry S3 Article SEP-OCT12
Infantry S3 Article SEP-OCT12Infantry S3 Article SEP-OCT12
Infantry S3 Article SEP-OCT12Mark Leslie
 
Final Report -Aircraft Design
Final Report -Aircraft DesignFinal Report -Aircraft Design
Final Report -Aircraft DesignThomas Spisak
 
Flight Mechanics Issues presentation
Flight Mechanics Issues presentationFlight Mechanics Issues presentation
Flight Mechanics Issues presentationstephen_mcparlin
 
Jason Jungmeyer JST Transcript
Jason Jungmeyer JST TranscriptJason Jungmeyer JST Transcript
Jason Jungmeyer JST TranscriptJASON JUNGMEYER
 
Dod weaponized weather_3sec3c-dod
Dod weaponized weather_3sec3c-dodDod weaponized weather_3sec3c-dod
Dod weaponized weather_3sec3c-dodRonald Angell
 
SKYSCRAPER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (IN-S.E.R.T.) : A POST 9/11 HIGH-RISE FIRS...
SKYSCRAPER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (IN-S.E.R.T.) : A POST 9/11 HIGH-RISE FIRS...SKYSCRAPER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (IN-S.E.R.T.) : A POST 9/11 HIGH-RISE FIRS...
SKYSCRAPER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (IN-S.E.R.T.) : A POST 9/11 HIGH-RISE FIRS...Global HeavyLift Holdings, LLC
 
My Joint Service Transcript (JST) - Army
My Joint Service Transcript (JST) - ArmyMy Joint Service Transcript (JST) - Army
My Joint Service Transcript (JST) - ArmyJames Calvo
 

What's hot (20)

Gutierrez_Resume_June_2015
Gutierrez_Resume_June_2015Gutierrez_Resume_June_2015
Gutierrez_Resume_June_2015
 
Reliability Analysis of a Fleet of Transportation Vehicles
Reliability Analysis of a Fleet of Transportation VehiclesReliability Analysis of a Fleet of Transportation Vehicles
Reliability Analysis of a Fleet of Transportation Vehicles
 
Apres Cobem09
Apres Cobem09Apres Cobem09
Apres Cobem09
 
Ortiz resume
Ortiz resumeOrtiz resume
Ortiz resume
 
Leete_MasterResume
Leete_MasterResumeLeete_MasterResume
Leete_MasterResume
 
Supply Systems Analyst Government Resume
Supply Systems Analyst Government ResumeSupply Systems Analyst Government Resume
Supply Systems Analyst Government Resume
 
VG RESUME AFGAN (2)
VG RESUME AFGAN (2)VG RESUME AFGAN (2)
VG RESUME AFGAN (2)
 
Cmr
CmrCmr
Cmr
 
E. mamajek resume
E. mamajek resumeE. mamajek resume
E. mamajek resume
 
Joint Service Transcrips AS2 Boschma
Joint Service Transcrips AS2 BoschmaJoint Service Transcrips AS2 Boschma
Joint Service Transcrips AS2 Boschma
 
Infantry S3 Article SEP-OCT12
Infantry S3 Article SEP-OCT12Infantry S3 Article SEP-OCT12
Infantry S3 Article SEP-OCT12
 
N1303047887
N1303047887N1303047887
N1303047887
 
Final Report -Aircraft Design
Final Report -Aircraft DesignFinal Report -Aircraft Design
Final Report -Aircraft Design
 
Flight Mechanics Issues presentation
Flight Mechanics Issues presentationFlight Mechanics Issues presentation
Flight Mechanics Issues presentation
 
Jason Jungmeyer JST Transcript
Jason Jungmeyer JST TranscriptJason Jungmeyer JST Transcript
Jason Jungmeyer JST Transcript
 
Dod weaponized weather_3sec3c-dod
Dod weaponized weather_3sec3c-dodDod weaponized weather_3sec3c-dod
Dod weaponized weather_3sec3c-dod
 
SKYSCRAPER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (IN-S.E.R.T.) : A POST 9/11 HIGH-RISE FIRS...
SKYSCRAPER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (IN-S.E.R.T.) : A POST 9/11 HIGH-RISE FIRS...SKYSCRAPER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (IN-S.E.R.T.) : A POST 9/11 HIGH-RISE FIRS...
SKYSCRAPER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (IN-S.E.R.T.) : A POST 9/11 HIGH-RISE FIRS...
 
Aircraft Design
Aircraft DesignAircraft Design
Aircraft Design
 
My Joint Service Transcript (JST) - Army
My Joint Service Transcript (JST) - ArmyMy Joint Service Transcript (JST) - Army
My Joint Service Transcript (JST) - Army
 
jst
jstjst
jst
 

Similar to TCM-RA AAAA Article (FEB 16)

TCM-RA AAAA (FEB 17)
TCM-RA AAAA (FEB 17)TCM-RA AAAA (FEB 17)
TCM-RA AAAA (FEB 17)Jeff White
 
Future Short Range Ground-Based Air Defence: System Drivers, Characteristics ...
Future Short Range Ground-Based Air Defence: System Drivers, Characteristics ...Future Short Range Ground-Based Air Defence: System Drivers, Characteristics ...
Future Short Range Ground-Based Air Defence: System Drivers, Characteristics ...Ashwin Samales
 
ArmyAviationMagazine-Oct13-Kelley
ArmyAviationMagazine-Oct13-KelleyArmyAviationMagazine-Oct13-Kelley
ArmyAviationMagazine-Oct13-KelleyMichael Kelley
 
A BRIEF REVIEW OF FUTURE PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE SYSTEMS
A BRIEF REVIEW OF FUTURE PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE SYSTEMSA BRIEF REVIEW OF FUTURE PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE SYSTEMS
A BRIEF REVIEW OF FUTURE PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE SYSTEMSAM Publications
 
Usdod road map_2007-2032
Usdod road map_2007-2032Usdod road map_2007-2032
Usdod road map_2007-2032Agie Abdissalam
 
Dod Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032
Dod Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032Dod Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032
Dod Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032528Hz TRUTH
 
Ballenger resume 22 dec2014a
Ballenger resume 22 dec2014aBallenger resume 22 dec2014a
Ballenger resume 22 dec2014aThomas Ballenger
 
Innovation and Invention-Equipping the Army for Current and Future Conflicts
Innovation and Invention-Equipping the Army for Current and Future ConflictsInnovation and Invention-Equipping the Army for Current and Future Conflicts
Innovation and Invention-Equipping the Army for Current and Future ConflictsRichard Lim
 
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptxINTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptxbvmohan1
 
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptxINTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptxbvmohan1
 
USMC Aviation Plan 2016
USMC Aviation Plan 2016USMC Aviation Plan 2016
USMC Aviation Plan 2016ICSA, LLC
 
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation PlanTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
A Presentation About U.S. Hypersonic Weapons and Alternatives
A Presentation About U.S. Hypersonic Weapons and AlternativesA Presentation About U.S. Hypersonic Weapons and Alternatives
A Presentation About U.S. Hypersonic Weapons and AlternativesCongressional Budget Office
 
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015Scott Sadler
 
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market Forecast
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market ForecastGlobal Military Transport Aircraft Market Forecast
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market Forecastaviationindustry67
 
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market Report
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market ReportGlobal Military Transport Aircraft Market Report
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market Reportaviationdefense30
 

Similar to TCM-RA AAAA Article (FEB 16) (20)

TCM-RA AAAA (FEB 17)
TCM-RA AAAA (FEB 17)TCM-RA AAAA (FEB 17)
TCM-RA AAAA (FEB 17)
 
Uav roadmap2005
Uav roadmap2005Uav roadmap2005
Uav roadmap2005
 
Future Short Range Ground-Based Air Defence: System Drivers, Characteristics ...
Future Short Range Ground-Based Air Defence: System Drivers, Characteristics ...Future Short Range Ground-Based Air Defence: System Drivers, Characteristics ...
Future Short Range Ground-Based Air Defence: System Drivers, Characteristics ...
 
ERDC-CERL_TR-15-24
ERDC-CERL_TR-15-24ERDC-CERL_TR-15-24
ERDC-CERL_TR-15-24
 
ArmyAviationMagazine-Oct13-Kelley
ArmyAviationMagazine-Oct13-KelleyArmyAviationMagazine-Oct13-Kelley
ArmyAviationMagazine-Oct13-Kelley
 
A BRIEF REVIEW OF FUTURE PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE SYSTEMS
A BRIEF REVIEW OF FUTURE PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE SYSTEMSA BRIEF REVIEW OF FUTURE PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE SYSTEMS
A BRIEF REVIEW OF FUTURE PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE SYSTEMS
 
Usdod road map_2007-2032
Usdod road map_2007-2032Usdod road map_2007-2032
Usdod road map_2007-2032
 
Dod Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032
Dod Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032Dod Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032
Dod Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032
 
Ballenger resume 22 dec2014a
Ballenger resume 22 dec2014aBallenger resume 22 dec2014a
Ballenger resume 22 dec2014a
 
Innovation and Invention-Equipping the Army for Current and Future Conflicts
Innovation and Invention-Equipping the Army for Current and Future ConflictsInnovation and Invention-Equipping the Army for Current and Future Conflicts
Innovation and Invention-Equipping the Army for Current and Future Conflicts
 
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptxINTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
 
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptxINTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO AERO WEAPONS.pptx
 
Esterly resume Oct2011
Esterly resume Oct2011Esterly resume Oct2011
Esterly resume Oct2011
 
USMC Aviation Plan 2016
USMC Aviation Plan 2016USMC Aviation Plan 2016
USMC Aviation Plan 2016
 
FDSA Thor Design Study Stage 1.pdf
FDSA Thor Design Study Stage 1.pdfFDSA Thor Design Study Stage 1.pdf
FDSA Thor Design Study Stage 1.pdf
 
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
 
A Presentation About U.S. Hypersonic Weapons and Alternatives
A Presentation About U.S. Hypersonic Weapons and AlternativesA Presentation About U.S. Hypersonic Weapons and Alternatives
A Presentation About U.S. Hypersonic Weapons and Alternatives
 
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
 
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market Forecast
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market ForecastGlobal Military Transport Aircraft Market Forecast
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market Forecast
 
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market Report
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market ReportGlobal Military Transport Aircraft Market Report
Global Military Transport Aircraft Market Report
 

TCM-RA AAAA Article (FEB 16)

  • 1. ARMY AVIATION Magazine 42 February 29, 2016 Since our last TCM-RA update, we continue to work to get the requirements “right” within the Avia- tion attack/recon portfolio. A seem- ingly straight-forward premise, there are many contributing factors that make this fundamental objective more challenging. Factors include continu- ously changing conditions, the result of rapidly evolving threats, competing priorities, and fiscal realities impact- ing both current readiness and future capability development. We focus our efforts linking strategic guidance and doctrine to various requirements docu- ments in order to close gaps in mobil- ity, survivability, and lethality. By doing so, the requirements we codify through the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) will remain operationally relevant within our three main lines of effort (LOEs) – weapon/munitions, attack, and re- connaissance capabilities.The end state is to increase Army Aviation’s contri- bution into unified land operations by delivering capabilities (in the form of both material and non-material solu- tions) to more effectively conduct air- ground operations (AGO) consistent with FM 3-04 Army Aviation. We are leveraging opportunities, created by continuously changing con- ditions, to correctly set requirements within our main 3 LOEs – weapon/ munitions, attack, and reconnaissance. Starting with weapons, we are drafting a comprehensive and holistic lethality/ munitions strategy that will align efforts across the Aviation enterprise. This is a significant endeavor and we are incor- porating stakeholders throughout U.S. Army Aviation Center of Excellence (USAACE), the Army Staff, and re- spective program managers – Joint At- tack Munition Systems (JAMS), Un- manned Aircraft Systems (UAS), and Apache – aiming toward three ends: 1. Improve lethality against sophisti- cated threat armor including passive and active countermeasures (CM); 2. Provide more air-to-ground weapon options (scalable and tailorable based on targets); 3. Right-size the munition mix/inven- tory supported by the Total Army Mu- nition Requirements (TAMR) analysis. Weapon/Munitions The underpinnings of the lethality/ munitions strategy are three-fold: the emerging Aviation training strategy/ gunnery qualification standards com- bined with ongoing TAMR analysis forming the ways; and resourcing in the Program Objective Memorandum (POM) and Long-Range Investment Analysis (LIRA) funding documents providing the means. This strategy will balance necessary operational capabili- ties with associated funding, creating trade space and remaining cost neutral within the Aviation portfolio. Addi- tions over the next 3-5 years include both the “Romeo” model Hellfire (R- HF) that effectively combines separate capabilities currently found in several HF variants. Additionally, the Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) will provide a dual-mode seeker (laser and radar guidance) in one missile deliver- ing improved lethality against threat armored systems that are protected with passive and active CM. Stake- holders are working to fully integrate the R-HF and JAGM (Initial Opera- tional Capability in FY19) on both the AH-64E and MQ-1C Gray Eagle. In the short term, we are collaborat- ing to field a limited quantity of laser- guided 2.75”Hydra rockets providing a smaller, precision-guided, complimen- tary capability for use against suitable soft-skin/light targets. Looking ahead to the mid/long term, we will explore possibilities of a Small Guided Muni- tion (SGM) that is both scalable and tailorable. The SGM could potentially provide both a drop glide and forward firing munition with modular seeker (guidance) and programmable warhead sections adding selectable options for Army Aviation to employ from both manned attack/reconnaissance rotary- wing helicopters and unmanned plat- forms. Current JCIDS efforts include the recently updated JAGM Capability Development Document (CDD), the Special Focus u TRADOC Capability Manager Updates A team of 1-229 ARB AH-64Es conducts training at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), WA. If you don’t like change, you’ll like irrelevance even less. – General Eric K. Shinseki, former Chief of Staff, U.S. Army Working to Get Requirements Right By COL Jeffrey W. White U.S.ARMYPHOTOBYCW3JOSEPHC.WANKELMAN,1-229THARB TRADOC Capability Manager for Reconnaissance & Attack (TCM-RA)
  • 2. ARMY AVIATION Magazine 43 February 29, 2016 initial drafting of the JAGM Capabil- ity Production Document (CPD), and revising/updating the 2005 Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APK- WS) Operational Requirements Docu- ment (ORD) to ensure we capture all current required weapons/munitions capabilities, contingent on senior lead- er approval of this strategy. Attack Shifting to the attack LOE, the AH-64E Version 6 (v6) is the final set of capability insertions completing E-model production. Material devel- opers and industry partners are sched- uled to field the AH-64E v6 to the operational force beginning in FY19. This latest attack helicopter variant adds critical capabilities identified as threshold requirements in the AH- 64E v6 Capability Production Docu- ment (CPD). Capabilities include sen- sor, mission command, weapon, and aircraft performance enhancements. The AH-64E v6 leverages technology improvements, addresses obsolescence issues in older AH-64D/E versions, and enables Army Aviation to conduct doctrinal attack, reconnaissance, move- ment to contact, and security missions across the full spectrum of military operations. Additionally, AH-64E v6 equipped units enhance the ability to execute Joint Combined Arms Opera- tions, supporting commanders across multiple domains (land, air, and sea). Consistent with strategic guidance, doctrine, and the Aviation Restructur- ing Initiative (ARI), the AH-64E v6 delivers capabilities to perform across multiple domains while mitigating the armed reconnaissance gap created as the Army divests all OH-58D Ki- owa Warriors. Teamed with UAS, the AH-64E v6 will greatly improve the ability resident in each Attack/Recon- naissance Battalion (ARB) and Heavy- Attack Reconnaissance Squadron (H- ARS) to conduct Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T). The AH-64E v6 will be capable of leveraging Army and Joint assets to acquire, positively iden- tify (PID), and facilitate clearance of fires to execute missions either autono- mously (on-board sensors and weap- ons) or employ MUM-T (integrated maneuver with UAS) – further increas- ing the ability to develop the situation, gain/maintain enemy contact, while enhancing survivability, fires, and mis- sion command. These capabilities are essential to maintain an asymmetric advantage over increasingly more capa- ble threats by maintaining overmatch and functioning as part of the Army Operating Concept (AOC). The AH- 64E will continue to be an essential part of Army Aviation, providing core attack and reconnaissance capabilities through the long-term. Reconnaissance Finally as part of the Recon LOE, we continue to support the divestiture of all OH-58 variants while exploring options to mitigate the validated aerial reconnaissance and security gap. OH- 58 A/C/D divestiture will continue through FY19 as we work to synchro- nize fielding of AH-64E and MQ-1C as part of each ARB along with AH- 64E and RQ-7B Shadows resident in each H-ARS as described in FM 3-04. We remain partnered with Future Verti- cal Lift (FVL) stakeholders to validate and prioritize necessary armed recon- naissance rotary-wing attributes. These attributes will guide various efforts – including modeling, simulation, and Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) studies – as we develop/update necessary require- ments documents to accurately describe required capabilities for both material and non-material solutions. TCM-RA,in concert with members of the Aviation Enterprise, focuses ef- forts on getting the attack/reconnais- sance and supporting system require- ments right. This is a collaborative process involving stakeholders in the operational force, institutional Army, material developers, and industry part- ners alike. Our methodology involves linking strategic guidance and doctrine to developing operationally relevant requirements while considering ad- ditional factors such as continuously changing threat, budgetary, and op- erational environment conditions. This process is complicated but essential to deliver the right weapon/munition, at- tack, and reconnaissance capabilities now and in the future. By doing so, Army Aviation will remain an enabler of unified land operations, capable of conducting effective AGO, adding to the legacy of our Branch by continuing to provide crucial aviation support to those in need. COL Jeffrey W. White is the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command Ca- pability Manager for Reconnaissance and Attack, with the U.S. Army Aviation Center of Excellence at Fort Rucker, AL. iPhone/iPad App Android App iTunes App Store Google Play Summit App 16SUMMIT Free Download Sponsored by ____________________ For all other devices, go to chirpe.com/16Summit 2016 Army Aviation Mission Solutions Summit Sponsored by Army Aviation Association of America With the app, you can: · Search for exhibitors · Review the schedule · View the floor plan · Create a daily schedule · Receive event alerts