2. Disclaimer: Any
appearance of
promoting UNH
Law is incidental!
3. Define Scope of Patent Research
• Patent Practice
– Prosecution
– Litigation
– Transactional / Business Aspects of IP
• Patent Research
– Legal research
– Searching patent literature & NPL
– Fact research
4. Current Paradigm for Integrating Law
School & Law Firm Patent Research?
• Law school landscape analysis
– Surveying librarians & websites
– NONE
– Handful of Advanced Legal Research: IP courses
• No evidence of patent searching training
– Few law school librarians with patent education
• Reference/Intellectual Property Librarian
5. Law School Patent Prosecution
Clinics Certification Pilot
• USPTO Law School Clinical
– 6 of 16 schools prosecute patents
• Non Pilot Clinics
– Arizona State University
– Ave Maria
– Chicago Kent
– U. Illinois
– U. Penn
– U. Virginia
– Others dabble in entrepreneur and innovation clinics
– High instructional and malpractice costs
6. The UNH Law Difference
• Founded by a 3d generation patent lawyer Robert Rines
with passion to prepare practice ready patent lawyers
– 1st Patent Practice Program in the U.S.
– Patent clinics for 40 years doing patent searches
– Only Academic IP Library in the U.S.
– Only academic IP Librarian in the U.S.
• Pioneering vision Library Director Judy Gire, Professor Bill Hennessey
and Dean Robert Viles
– Only two year elective patent searching curriculum in U.S.
– Only Patent Landscape Analysis Clinic in U.S.
• Professor Stanley Kowalski, ITTI Director
7. UNH Law Model
• Implemented Information Literacy Program
drives patent research curriculum
– Portfolio of curricular and extra curricular offerings
• Some IP problems used in 1L LRIL class
• Mining Patent class – a 20 year patent searching 2 credit
class
• LPIL patent searching 1 credit mini courses
• ITTI Patent Landscape Analysis Clinic (Basic & Advanced)
• Patent Searching Certificate
• Guest lectures in patent law and practice classes
• Patent law professors require patent searches
8. Patent Information Literacy K-12 and University Wide?
• Non-law University Librarians Teaching Patent Searching
Courses
– Connie Wu, Rutgers (PTRC)
– Jan Confort, Clemson (PTRC)
• Promote synergies between law school and other
university librarians to teach patent information literacy.
• Don MacMillan, Patently Obvious: The Place For Patents
In Information Literacy in the Sciences. 20 Research
Strategies 149 (2005)
13. Factors affecting paradigm shift?
• PATENT PROFESSORS AT MOST LAW SCHOOLS
HAVE NO INTEREST IN PATENT RESEARCH
– Much of academy scholarship is theory – not
practice based
– No experience or old experience : “farm it out”
– Don’t teach business aspects of patents curriculum
– Increase empirical legal periodical using patent
research on the rise = promise.
15. Then when is the tipping point?
• Many law school librarians face serious and continuous
budget cuts that require balancing of priorities
– Being law librarians
• Staff cuts result in Librarians doing paraprofessional activities
– Being teachers
• some Library faculty low caste = consequences
• If a patent research course or a substantive law course has to be
cut…
• Law faculty like senior partners in some schools
– Being team players
• Showing worth in growing service to institutions
16. Patent Research Information Literacy
Requires Re$ources
• Patent law firms REVOLT & demand a shift in
consciousness
• Prioitization
– Time allocation
– Hiring or training patent information literate
librarians
– Patent law professors NEED to advocate for patent
research training “through and “through”
– Fees for high end platforms?
• UNH Law provided fee unlimited access by major vendors
17. Paradigm Shift : next step
• COMMUNICATION
– Patent law firm librarians and partners need to
communicate to law schools on a GRANULAR level
what problem solving skills they desire of new
associates
– This relationship needs to be institutionalized and
systematized
• associated opportunity costs
– Consider embedding law school librarians in patent
firms to gain the tasks, tools, strategies and insights
18. 200+ Law Schools…
• Diversity of capacity and priorities
• Most law schools now teach patent law
– only a few have a deep patent practice curriculum
• Develop a mirror twin to the AALL PLI-SIS IP with
academic librarians
• Dialog and meet regularly at professional meetings
• Use human and social networking
• Never stop, never stop fighting till the fight is done.
19. Paradigm shift : jump start patent
research small investment
• Top down law school “corporate culture”
requiring patent research skills events
• Designate GTP for patent research
• Invite patent information vendors…they will
come
21. Promote Student to Student Promotion
• Mary Gilligan
– I think we should incorporate the role of Summer Associates into this fine
dance we are crafting. I know at Pennie (and during the times of stiff
competition to get the most qualified associates), we offered abbreviated
versions of our training programs. I feel the students can be good
ambassadors to bridging the gap between school and firm, while keeping a
foot in both pools.
• Peer to peer education is a reality
– These skills show a competitive advantage
– All law students want to show demonstrable value
– Law firm librarians and attorneys need to support the value of
mastering patent & NPL search and applications
22. • The importance of the many applications of
patent data and NPL will only increase as the
business aspects of IP grow
• Those law schools who fail to grow this area of
their curriculum do so at their peril.
23. Student Teach Teachers
• UNH Law engineer TA/grad Matthew Preiss
– Top 50% of research skills instruction is
responsibility of law schools
– Other 50% is professional training – the
responsibility of law firms
• AALL Law Library Journal literature has
general surverys
– Shall we do patent research skills survey?
24. UNH Law has a long history of
commitment to preparing the
highest quality practice-ready
patent lawyers with solid research
skills.
Dean, University of New Hampshire School of Law
Former Chief Justice, NH Supreme Court