“Servitization” (bundling of products with services) has become an imperative in today’s economy, especially in developed markets. Product companies that do not embrace this concept are bound to face stiff competition from low-cost manufacturers in emerging markets. Key among the risks they face is the prospect of being forced out of the market in the long term. Hence, the benefits of servitization are too compelling to ignore.
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
Infosys Insights: Driving revenue through service innovation
1. - Dr. Martin Lockstrom
Driving Revenue Through Service Innovation
INSIGHTS
2. Introduction
Most company executives have ambitious
growth plans. It’s not uncommon to see
revenue growth targets of 10-15% per year,
even though overall markets might grow
at a more modest rate of 2-5% depending
on geography. Obviously, this means
that it is not sufficient to simply protect
one’s market share and grow with the
market, but more importantly, to create
new revenue streams from new products
and services. In recent years, many
manufacturers in developed markets have
been struggling to stay competitive as
competition especially from manufacturers
in emerging markets has mounted. Those
that have survived and are still thriving all
have something in common: they have
made a transition from a product-centric to
service-centric organization.
Servitization – What is It?
As products across all industries are
becoming increasingly commoditized,
many companies are trying to adopt a
more service-oriented business model. The
development is logical: research suggests
that Western companies have to reduce
their cost by at least 30% in the mid-term
in order to stay competitive. Servitization
means that a producer bundles the
products with services into a solution, with
the objective of creating new revenue
streams.
There are also other rationales behind;
for instance, a service solution is more
intangible in nature vis-à-vis a pure
product, meaning that it is harder to
analyze and imitate by competitors,
meaning that profit margins potentially
should be higher, at least in the short to
medium term. Furthermore, a service
solution is also more outcome-oriented,
meaning that the producer gets paid for
helping the customer to reaching an end
rather than providing a means to an end.
This also helps in negotiations, as the
rhetoric can effectively be shifted away
from pricing toward value.
One of the pioneers in this area is Rolls-
Royce, which launched its“Power-By-The-
Hour”concept in the 1960s (Figure 1). It is
important to remember that servitization
is distinctly different from leasing, where
the latter is merely a way of spreading a
cash flow over an extended period of time,
whereas the former is about creating new
revenue streams.
3. Table 1. Producer and customer benefits of servitization
Figure 1. Servitization at Rolls-Royce
POWER-BY-THE-HOUR AT ROLLS-ROYCE
Situation:
In the 1960s, RR wanted to improve customer service
and help them shift CAPEX to OPEX
Solution/Innovation:
RR took responsibility for delivery, operations,
maintenance and repair throughout its lifecycle.
Basically means paying for a jet engine as a service
only when it is used (and working) through a
fixed-fee per flying hour. Usage time was manually
recorded and approved mutually on trust basis
Outcomes:
Reduced total cost of ownership (TCO) for customer
and higher revenue for RR, lower capital expenditure
The Case for Servitization
Customers increasingly adopt more of a variable-cost structure with as low upfront investment as possible, i.e. buying construction and
industrial services on demand instead of a one-time purchase. A viable way of winning and keeping customers is to reduce complexity
and simplify for the customer, particularly through servitization of product offerings, e.g.”pay for a hole instead of a drill”. An overview of
servitization benefits for customers and producers are shown in Table 1.
As can be seen above, there are clear benefits to both parties involved, which can explain the success of the model. Servitization has
taken place in most industries; an overview of illustrative cases is shown in Table 2.
PRODUCER BENEFITS
• Predictable and constant revenue stream from
subscribed individuals for the duration of the
subscriber’s agreement.
• Reduce uncertainty and the riskiness of the
enterprise.
• Greater customer intimacy through more regular
customer interaction.
• Higher average customer lifetime value (ACLV) than
that of nonrecurring business models
• More potential for upselling and cross-selling other
products or services.
CUSTOMER BENEFITS
• No need for upfront investments
• More predictiable cash flow
• Lower threshold for making purchase decision
• Greater incentive to maintain relationships with
their customers (after all, why should they care once
they’ve received their money?)
• Better opportunities of alignment with customer’s
goals and expectations
• The customer that receives value is more likely to
buying the service and possibly at an increased rate
in the future.