Creationism vs Evolution Debate

Creationism vs. Evolution Essays
Creationism vs. Evolution
This paper will focus on the huge controversy between Creationism and Evolution. I will provide two opposing viewpoints on this subject. First, the
discussion will focus on the question of why many people believe that God created the universe and all living things.
On the other end of the spectrum, scientific information will be presented that substantiates the evidence against the existence of God. This creationism
counter–argument known as evolution has its roots in our contemporary understanding of a progressive process of natural evolution. This process
shaped the nature of all living things beginning with single–cell organisms and ending with highly complex creatures such as humanoids....show more
content...
Because of this, each consecutive generation will exhibit more offspring with the more successful trait. The phrase "survival of the fittest" is derived
from the process of continuous adaptation and selective survival based on most successful inherited traits. (Biographies, 2000).
Even though many people believe that the theory of evolution was Darwin's personal idea and creation, several of his thoughts actually existed before
his time. Back in time of the ancient Greeks, the concept of life evolving came about. Two Greek philosophers,
Anaximander and Empedocles had theories stating that all animals, as well as human beings, began in the vast waters of the earth, the oceans. From
these theories, it was said that some animals left their natural habitat, the water, and adapted to life on land. Furthermore, the Greeks wrote about
natural selection, but they did not provide a specific explanation as to how evolution would work. Because of these already known facts, the focal
point of Charles Darwin's theory was formed and an explanation to his theory of evolution came to life (Spetner 3).
However, creationism is a contemporary adaptation of the timeless parable of the clash between Good and Evil. The concept behind this struggle is
that everything in the world cannot remain neutral and must choose a side when in conflict. You are either on God's team or you are siding
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Creationism vs. Evolution Essay
Where we come from is a question as old as mankind itself. There are countless numbers of religions, each with their own twist on the origins of earth
and mankind, but one of the most highly visible debates would be creationism vs. evolution. Depending on where your beliefs lie, the Earth has been
around somewhere in the neighborhood of 6,000 years to 4.5 billion years. One would tend to believe that this vast difference in time would make it
impossible to have 2 "theories" that are so widely accepted. However this debate gives you just that. Each argument has its variations, however it
comes down to either God created the Earth and all things in it as they are now or that life today has evolved from a...show more content...
Under the same idea, the "Old Earth" train of thought is that the "days" mentioned in Genesis were actually up to many millions of years each. This
is one of many "theories" that justifies the actual age of the Earth being around 4.5 billion years old. The third view states that the story of creation
contained in Genesis is not a literal or even a chronological account of happenings. It is instead a guide promoting a six–day workweek with the
seventh day a day of worship to God. The last view is much like the second, in that it considers the "days" to be God's workdays, which may or may not
be equal to an Earth calendar day. Each day represents a period of time that God performed a major task. Each view has the same underlying concept
that God created everything, and the way it is today, it the way it was when it was created.
Webster's Dictionary defines evolution as a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the
distinguishable differences are due to modification in successive generations. Like creation, evolution is not immune from differing of opinions.
Evolution is split between two frames of though, naturalistic and theistic.
Naturalistic evolution is pretty much cut and dry. It simply states that life started as a single one–celled organism. The universe was created 14 billion
years ago, and the Earth was

Essay about Creationism vs. Evolution
"Life has no meaning. Jesus gives our life meaning, we must accept him to give meaning to our life. It futile to ask about the meaning of life when you
are the answer."
вЂ• Rob Geis
Creationism and the study of evolution has been a controversial debate for decades now, leaving many people on one side or the other. Creationism
argues that faith should take precedent over science, basing its beliefs on one book for guidance, the Bible. God created the earth and everything on it,
taking six days. Evolutionists believe that the earth is much older than the Bible describes, and that plants, animals, and humans are a result of a natural
progression called evolution. There were no common ancestors (Adam and Eve) from whom we came; it...show more content...
In the span of six days, God created the heavens, the earth, the sun, moon, water, animals, and ended with the finalГ© of human beings. Other major
events such as Noah's flood occurred along the lifespan of the earth, accounting for the distribution of fossils and the formation of the earth's layers.
St. Augustine of Hippo (who was raised a Christian and later became a member of the Manicheans) believed that the Old Testament was nonsense. He
"believed therefore that organic forms were potentially in a kind of seed–form, and realized actually when the conditions were right– when the seas
appeared for instance"(Ruse, 51). Augustine believed that God created everything in one move: conception, wish, and creation were all at the same
time. This thinking was also a belief held by Galileo later on in history.
Evolution is defined as "the development by natural causes of all organisms, those today and those yesterday, from other forms probably ultimately
much simpler and originally perhaps from non–living substances"(Ruse, 12). According to evolutionists, the earth began approximately 4.5 billion
years ago, with the explosion of life beginning around 55 million years ago. To evolutionists, the starting of life began as inorganic molecules that
underwent a natural transformation (through electricity or heat) to become organic molecules. These building blocks joined to form macromolecule
chains that eventually made up organisms. The chains

Evolution vs.Creationism Essay
Evolution Vs Creationism
People have always wondered how life originated and how so many different kinds of plants and animals arose. Stories of a supernatural creation of
life developed among many peoples. The Bible, for example, tells of God's creation of humans and other higher animals over several days. Many
people also believed that insects, worms, and other lower creatures spontaneously generated from mud and decay. Long after these stories became
rooted in tradition, scientists began to question them.
Albert Einstein said, "The scientist's religious feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an
intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic...show more content...
All organisms can be traced back to a common ancestor from inanimate matter. Charles Darwin once said, "When I view all beings not as
special creations, but as the lineal descendants of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Cambrian system was deposited, they
seem to me to become ennobled." (Darwin)
Creationists believe in a divine creator, God. Creationism has a broad range of beliefs involving a reliance on God's miraculous work to explain the
origin of the universe, of life, and of the different kinds of plants and animals on Earth. According to the creationist view, God willed everything into
existence, and this is how humans came onto the Earth. Creationists say that the evolution theory is biased and incomplete. They believe that the fossil
records fail to provide a link between diverse groups. To find out how old fossils are, scientists use a method called radioisotope dating, which
measures the amount of uranium or lead lost over the years.
Two decades after Darwin's Origin of Species was published many religious leaders feared that a less–than–literal reading of the biblical story would
result in a loss of faith; and well–known spokesmen for the cause–such as William Jennings Bryan– of moral decay to be evidence of the damage
brought about by the teaching of the godless evolution. The issue was argued on a number of platforms, one of the most famous being the Scopes
Trial (1925), in which a high school

Since the Age of the Enlightenment, the institution of religion has had to contend with the opposition of science regarding the issues of the origins of
the world and of the human species. Up until around the end of the 17th century, the church was the authority on how the world and everything in it
had come to be. However, with the great intellectual revolution came thinkers such as Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and many others who
challenged the biblical assumptions with empirically deduced scientific theories. The Catholic Church had a nasty habit of persecuting such ideological
dissent toward creationism, calling it heresy and thereby somewhat suppressing a complete upheaval of the Scriptures. For many centuries to come,
...show more content...
The representatives of the ACLU were willing to defend any person willing to face trial for teaching the subject in schools in order to contest the law
and bring its nature into the national limelight. The town leaders of Dayton obliged, being glad for the opportunity of some publicity. William Jennings
Bryan represented the State of Tennessee and staked his claim saying that the State of Tennessee "has already held that this act is constitutional, it being
the law of the land, there is but one issue before this court and jury, and that is, did the defendant violate the statute" (Bryan). Bryan felt that the
defense had no case because the trial was not to debate the constitutionality of a law, but to prove that said law was broken. The prosecution discovered
that they needed to argue the irrationality of teaching evolution and claimed that it was only a mysterious theory and could not possibly have expert
testimonies. The prosecution also argued that because science was the enabler of modern warfare, it was also a source of evil; evil should not be
taught in schools. Bryan said that no teacher had the right either, to cause ideological conflict within the home by influencing a child with theories
contrary to their parentally instilled religious background

Evolution Vs. Creationism Essay
Evolution vs. Creationism
Abstract
In the history of science vs. religion there have been no issues more intensely debated than evolution vs. creationism. The issue is passionately debated
since the majority of evidence is in favor of evolution, but the creation point of view can never be proved wrong because of religious belief. Human
creation breaks down into three simple beliefs; creation theory, naturalistic evolution theory, and theistic evolution theory. The complexities of all three
sides create a dilemma for what theory to support among all people, religious and non–religious.
The theories of human evolution may always cause a heated dispute. Each theory presents its own evidence proving...show more content...
Until science proves its naturalistic theory correct, the world will have to choose between the three theories based on personal beliefs, religious values,
and scientific information.
The creation theory includes over 500 different creation stories based on numerous religions (Religious Tolerance, 2004). The vast number of stories
creates strains on which evolution story is accurate. Christians that are creationists take the bible literally and believe the earth is around 10,000
years old. The creation theory will always exist with religion, so the creation theory can never be proved wrong since it is simply a religious belief.
Religion is still very important in the United States, and the acceptance of the naturalization theory would completely change Christianity all together.
Religious Tolerance, a website that outlays the conflict of evolution vs. creationism, explains how naturalism would shake Christianity. Religious
tolerance states that the acceptance of evolution would make people interpret Genesis symbolically and classify evolution stories as myths. Since the
creation stories are closely tied to the fall of man and to original sin, the entire role of Jesus would change. Without original sin, there would be no
need for a savior, and Christianity would change drastically. This further proves that the creation theory will live as long as religion. The Gallup
Organization studies what percentages of Americans believe in each of

Creationism Vs. Evolution Essay
In 1859, Charles Darwin published his book On the Origin of
Species by Means of Natural Selection, which proposed the theory of evolution. This book, along with others that followed, began the long dispute
between evolutionist and creationist. Were we created by a supernatural Supreme Being, or did our creation occur purely by chance? First, lets look at
the two conflicting theories. Common usage of the term "evolution" is that living things in our world have come into existence through unguided
naturalistic processes beginning from a primeval mass of subatomic particles and radiation, over 20 billion years ago. The idea of Creation comes
from the first two chapters of Genesis which states that God created the heavens and...show more content...
Therefore we have a catch–22 situation. Besides, there are geological evidences that confirm the existence of an oxidizing atmosphere as far back as
can be determined.
Among these are: the oxidation of ferrous iron in early rocks, and the precipitation of limestone in great quantities.1 Now, lets assume for a minute that
the ideal environment for evolution to occur existed. We would then need a means by which the basic building blocks of life could be constructed.
Before you can assemble the large macro–molecules necessary for life you must have a ready supply of basic organic molecules. Among these would
be tons of sugars, amino acids, purines, and pyrimidines. Now assuming we had a vast primitive ocean full of these molecules there are still obstacles
that would need to be overcome to have a suitable ocean. The first problem would be the diluting effect of the vast ocean. There would not be enough
quantities of each basic molecule for molecular formation therefore insufficient quantities would result. The second problem would be that in order for
chemical bonds to form there would need to be an external source of energy. Unfortunately the same energy that creates these bonds is much more
likely to destroy them. The last major obstacle to overcome would be the incompatibility of different

Creationism is the theory that man, the earth, and the rest of the universe was originally created rather than randomly exploding from nothingness into
chance existence. We reside on the surface of a small superbly crafted, autonomous self regulating space vehicle. Together with survival, conquest and
death we bear witness to beauty, fragrances, love and music. Think about this. Mathematics, philosophy, springtime,depravity, farming, courtship,
quasars, and iphones; all came from nothingness?, formed by chance......?
Of all the generations thus far to inhabit the Earth, we have the least excuse for not recognizing the quiet presence of The Scientific Mathematician who
set everything into motion around us. We should be in awe, not...show more content...
"And God said, let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit trees yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself,
upon the earth: And it was so. "And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding, fruit, whose seed
was in itself, after his kind; and God saw that it was good. "And the evening and the morning were the third day.
"And God said let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons,
and for days, and years. "And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light upon the earth; and it was so. "And God
made two great lights: The greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night: He made the stars also. "And God set them in the
firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth. "And to rule over the day and over the night and to divide the light from the darkness: and
God saw that it was good. "And the evening, and the morning were the fourth day.
"And God said, let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath light, and fowls that may fly above the earth in the open
firmament of heaven. "And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after
their kind,

Creationism Vs. Evolution Essay
The theory of evolution, as set forth by Charles Darwin in 1859, stated that all plant and animal life evolved over long periods of time from simple
to more complicated forms through mutation and adaptation. He also taught that only the fittest of each species would survive. He further postulated
that the first living cell evolved in a "warm warm little pond" and that it took billions of years for the present diversity of living things to evolve. At
the time, it was thought that the few "missing links" in the fossil record would be soon filled.(Darwin, 1927 ). Today, however, there is today a
considerable body of scientific evidence that refutes this entire theory. The findings of the last 50 years both deny the possibility of...show more
content...
Mendel's Laws explain most of the physical variations observed in living things. Genes, the genetic units of heredity, are merely reshuffled from one
generation to another, but new genes are never formed. Different combinations create variations, but these variations are limited. Each cow, person,
dog, etc. has variations, but the genetic units do not permit dog–people, or cow–dogs. Breeding experiments by competent biologists confirm that these
boundaries exist.(Fix,1984). Since mutations are the only mechanism (according to Darwin) by which new genetic material becomes available, then
mutations must have occurred regularly to have spawned all our present life forms, and further, mutation must consistently go from simple to complex
to have gotten us out of the primordial ooze. However, many noted biologists, including C.P. Martin and Theodosius Dobzhansky (who mutated the
fruit fly), consistently report that mutation does produce hereditary changes, but "invariably affect it (the organism) adversely."(Salisbury, 1969). All
animals are born with complex organs (the human brain has over a hundred thousand billion electrical connections), and further, all animals are born
with fully developed organs. If evolution were occurring, at some point people

Evolution Vs. Creationism
Just as there are two sides to every story, there are two major sides to the story that is our Earth's history. An ever
–clashing "battle", so to speak,
between a religious and evolutionary outlook continues exist as a heated dispute. One side contains the scientific community which mainly uses proof of
evolution to explain our upbringing, while the other side lies the creationists– those who believe in the use of biblical means and an intelligent ruler for
explanation. Regardless of controversial turmoil, I believe that the two standpoints of Evolution and Creationism may coexist to explain our creation.
For as long as we've been around to ponder, the question of how we "got here", or even how we were "made" has always existed. In terms of...show
more content...
However, there is an "in–between" belief, known as Intelligent Design. Intelligent design not only agrees with science but considers religious
involvement; the term caters to both beliefs harmonically. Stating the acceptation of evolution to create our species on this planet, creationism is
accepted in the belief that some things were possibly guided by an intelligent being, supernatural force, or God, in order to create a successful
complexity. (Betty Stafford) Considering the standpoint of IT's belief, it is the perfect view for anyone with an open–minded outlook, which of whom
does not believe in an definite explanation for our upbringing. Although in partial agreement with the scientific community, IT disapproves of the
Darwinist theory. This theory believes in "lucky genetic accidents" in terms of natural selection, meaning that while Darwinism presumes that natural
selection did create our complexity, these "lucky accidents" were not based on just luck and chance. (Betty Stafford) Intelligent design concludes that
such accidents were actually decisions that may have been made by our intelligent creator or God. (Betty Stafford) Within Intelligent Design's the
position, the two beliefs of evolution and creationism exist in perfect inclusion in the fact that not one theory is more accepted than

Evolution vs. Creationism Essay
The Evolution vs. Creationism controversy goes all the way back to the Publishing of Origin of Species in 1859 by Darwin laying the foundation for
the evolution of life to be understood. Scientists are continuously finding more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; that organisms descended
from a common ancestor modified by the mechanism of natural selection resulting in the evolution of species adapting to their environment. The
following are the main geological topics concerning creationism: radiometric dating, transitional forms and the Cambrian explosion. Creationism is
nothing more than a child's fairytale that lacks any scientific proof.
The aspect of radiometric dating is controversial to most...show more content...
Plus or minus a couple million years has a negligible effect on the results attempting to be obtained. Radiometric dating consistently prove from
analysis of bolide fragments that the earth is about 4.6 billion years old and once again disproving the Bible's 6,000 years. The problem for
creationism is that they can't prove there 'fairytale' correct because it's based on little fact, so they attempt to make the other valid ideas sound
ridiculous. Therefore, creationism attempts to prove radiometric dating incorrect and is nothing more than a feeble attempt to bring credibility to there
own ideas and beliefs.
Secondly, a once thought problem with evolution was the lack of transitional phases in the fossil record. For example it was once thought there were no
transitional phases between birds and reptiles; this has now been proven false by paleontologists. Archaeopteryx has distinctive avian characteristics
including a wishbone, a bony sternum and feathers (Geology). Several of its reptilian characteristics include unfused metacarpal bones, a long bony tail
and three well developed fingers. What is also interesting is that archaeopteryx lived at the same time as the dinosaurs. Again, it seems as if creationists
randomly start making assumptions in an attempt to slander other valid theories rather than proving there's correct (even thought that's impossible). "If
evolution were true, there would be more transitional

Creationism Vs Evolution
One of the most debated topics is creationism versus evolution. People all over the world have argued on where and how life started and how humans
came to be. Usually the arguments come between christians and atheists. The topic has been debated about by many famous scientists including Ken
Ham and Bill Nye. Both these people defend their position in trying to prove where they actually came from. Is there a superior being that created the
universe? Was there abig bang that led to life itself? These questions have become the most Googled questions on the planet. However, earth did not
begin with a big bang. It did not just come from a speck. It came from God, the lord and our father who is in Heaven watching over everybody. I do not
believe...show more content...
Many scientists who are atheists will be told by creationists that evolution is just a theory. The main comeback most to all of them have is " well
gravity is just a theory but does that make it invalid?". Another big thing that atheists use against creationists is that rocks are dated to be over a
million years old. In the Ken Ham vs Bill Nye debate, Bill Nye uses the statement that "rocks are more than a million years old" several times. This
is probably the basis of Bill Nye's argument because how could an Earth created by a God only be six thousand years old and have rocks more than
a million years old on it (Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham Debate)? Another big topic evolutionists use is "how come there is so many religions in the world?
Why is Christianity the true basis in how the world is created?". Biologist Greta Christina states that, if creationism is true then couldn't it be any
religion. She goes on saying that the Spaghetti Monster could be the creator or that Mohamed could be the true God. This is a big reason why she
believes creationism is invalid (Christina). The Big Bang Theroy is what any scientists who disagree with creationism believe in. The Big Bang
theory is an effort to explain what happened at the very beginning of our universe. According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence
around 13.7 billion years ago. So a basic definition of the how

Essay on Evolution VS. Creationism
Since the beginning of the human race there has been a lingering question as to the origins of man and how all living things acquired their
characteristics. The two main theories that arose over time were Creationism and Evolution, both of which provided very distinct answers to this
question. Creationism based its answer on the idea of a supernatural power or being that created the entire universe, man and the numerous other
organisms that live within it. While, Evolution theorizes that all living things have the potential to change and grow over time into something new and
different. So in other words, one theory suggests that humans and all the organisms on Earth are the result of divine design, while the other indicates
that they...show more content...
Every one of these flaws points out that the Creationists theory that the Earth, all of the organisms on it, and everything that surrounds it has not
changed or been altered since the flood is inaccurate. Biogeography for example shows that "closely allied" species have a tendency to live on the "same
continent... or within the same group of oceanic islands... despite their species–by–species preferences for different habitats, food source, [and] of
conditions of climate" (Quammen 4). The explanation for this is that "they descended from common ancestors" and this can be verified with the
paleontology flaw because that flaw deals with the fossils of plants and animals "that had [either] become extinct or that still existed but in different
forms" which indicates not only that organisms have changed over time, but also provides evidence that "closely allied" organism have lived in the
same areas of centuries (Quammen 4; Parks 24). Then in the taxonomic classification flaw these "closely allied" spices can be "systematically
classified, according to their shared similarities" which, suggests that "closely allied" organisms descended from common ancestor because of the traits
and similar organs that allows this type of classification (Quammen 5). The presence of these similar traits and organs introduces the flaw of vestigial
characteristics because although some of these do not have any current

Creationism vs Evolution Debate

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Creationism vs Evolution Debate