Bill Of Rights Unnecessary

Bill Of Rights Unnecessary
The United States had only been out of the revolutionary war for a few years and the call for a new government was growing more urgent. The
constitution was drafted and some drafters thought that certain guarantees were necessary. They proposed a Bill of Rights so that the new government
would not be able to become as tyrannical as the British one. However a Bill of Rights was unnecessary. Anti–Federalists were worried the government
would take away the people's rights. However Congress only has the power to do what is said it can do in the constitution, and nowhere is it stated
that they can restrict the rights of the people. As James Wilson puts it "In a government like the proposed one, there can be no necessity for a bill of
rights. For..
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on The Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights is a list of limitations on the power of the government. Firstly, the Bill of Rights is successful in assuring the adoption of the
Constitution. Secondly, the Bill of Rights did not address every foreseeable situation. Thirdly, the Bill of Rights has assured the safety of the people of
the nation. Successes, failures, and consequences are what made the Bill of Rights what they are today. Firstly, the Bill of Rights has guaranteed the
adoption of the Constitution. James Madison proposed the Bill of Rights to the First Federal Congress on June 8, 1789 (Primary Documents 1). The
First Federal Congress then proposed the twelve amendments to the constitution to the state legislatures (Constitutional Politics in Ohio 1). The...show
more content...
An agreement was finally made to create the Bill of Rights to help secure ratification of the Constitution itself. Secondly, the Bill of Rights did not
address every foreseeable situation. One failure of the Bill of Rights was the first amendment of the original Bill of Rights. The amendment concerned
the number of constituents for each Representative and was never ratified. It said that once the House has one hundred members, it should not go
below one hundred, and once it reached two hundred, it should not go below two hundred (Mount 1). Another failure was The Anti–Title Amendment.
This amendment said that any citizen who accepted or received any title of nobility from a foreign power, or who accepted without the consent of
Congress any gift from a foreign power, by would no longer be a citizen (Mount 1). Basically, this said that if someone received or accepted something
from a foreign power, that person would no longer be a citizen. The Anti–Title Amendment was submitted to the States in 1810 and was ratified by only
twelve states, the last being in 1812 (Mount 1). Thirty–eight states are required to ratify to add an amendment. The Slavery Amendment was another
failure of the Bill of Rights. This amendment was not ratified because the House did not want any amendment to be made to the Constitution which
would authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any state, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of

Bill of Rights
Bill of Rights & Amendments Paper
Intro
The United States is a country that was founded on the principle of freedom; it took the Bill of Rights to be added to the Constitution to guarantee
citizens freedom. The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments in the constitution; a document that outlines how the new American
government would be created and operated. The Constitution was ratified in 1788 which was the start of protecting the interests of each citizen, two
years later the Bill of Rights was proposed by congress and went into effect in 1791. It was designed to prevent the government from taking total
power over citizens and to provide them with legal defenses. This essay will discuss the understanding of how...show more content...
However, it was not until "the Voting Rights of 1965 that aimed to overcome legal barriers at the state and local levels that denied blacks their right to
vote under the 15th amendment" (The 15th Amendment: Ratification, 2012). This had to happen because despite the amendment people were still
using discriminatory practices against the blacks. There is a difference between the earlier amendments and the later ones because many of the earlier
ones like the Bill of Rights were about civil liberties. The 19th through the 27th amendments dealt with political rights and technical issues. For
example one of these amendments granted women the right to vote and some clarified the succession to the presidency and vice presidency. The later
amendments work to increase political rights and to conform the details of our system of government. Conclusion
Our individual rights are the most traditional and valued accomplishment of the United States, there are other states that are not entitled to have such
rights. Each of the amendments are very important to how we live in today's society; the first ten which is the Bill of Rights grants Americans their
freedom. Our founding fathers had a vision on what they wanted America to become they laid the foundation for the constitution and allowed
modification if necessary they knew that America would grow and the constitution would need adjustments; that is exactly what

Do you know what keeps, and has kept America in order since 1789? That would be The Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is simply the first ten
amendments. Written by James Madison, The Bill of Rights lists specific prohibitions on governmental power. The Bill of Rights was officially added
into the constitution in 1791. The amendments are on display in the National Archives Museum. The First Amendment states that "everybody has
freedom of speech, press, and religion." The First Amendment allows us, as U.S. citizens to speak freely about our feelings throughout the government.
The First Amendment could possibly be the most important in the whole Bill of Rights. This amendment affects us in our daily life, whether we're
teenagers or adults...show more content...
The law is allowed to search a person if they see things suspicious, which could possibly lead to crimes. The Fifth Amendment states that " no
person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except for cases
arising in the land and naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the
same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." This
amendment states in the first line that, no one can be put on trial for a serious crime unless decided by a Grand Jury that there is enough proof to
need a trial. It also states if there is enough proof then the Grand Jury can decide to indict them and they can be charged with the crime. The second
line states that military personnel can go to a trial without a Grand Jury first deciding so, this is only applicable in time of war or national emergency.
In the third line of the Fifth Amendment states that if someone is put on trial and the trial ends then the person cannot

The Bill of Rights Essay
Bill of Rights
We live in the 21st century, where most Americans mind their own business but take for granted our God given rights. Not only God given rights but
also those established by our founding forefathers. This paper will illustrate and depict the importance of the original problems faced when adopting
the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It will discuss the importance of the first amendment, the due process of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and the 8th
amendments. Last but not least the importance of what is known as the "second Bill of Rights" (14th amendment). What problems with the original
document motivated the adoption of the Bill of Rights?
Many felt the Constitution was strongly focused on the power and authority the central...show more content...
Thus Congress included the Bill of Rights and Federalist and Anti–Federalist came to a compromise and the Constitution came to be. Give one example
of each of the five rights in the First Amendment. Freedom of religion: A great example of freedom of religion is that fact that central government
or the state that someone might live in, cannot impose a said religion or prosecute for worshiping the religion of choice of an individual. Freedom
of speech: The freedom to speak freely and without censorship and limitation. A great example of this would be a talk radio, where people call in to
voice opinion on real time political controversy. Right to assembly: The right to form groups, to organize and to assemble together to address issues
of a common goal. The ability to organize is an important means by which citizens can influence their governments and leaders ("Freedom of
assembly and association", N.D.). Right to petition: The right to present request to the government without punishment or reprisal. A great example is
picketing and peaceful protest. Keep in mind a violent protest is against the law and you will be arrested and prosecuted for such actions. Right to
press: "Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it." Thomas Jefferson to John Jay,
1786. (Coates, 1995–99). Go to the "First Amendment Center" web site and pick a related court case for one or two

Argumentative Essay: The Bill Of Rights
The freedoms outlined in the Bill of Rights are sill significant today, and thanks to them the American citizens have a right to speak out freely,
assemble in a peaceful manner, or to get a speedy and more importantly fair trial. In my opinion, this document and its heritage has been incorporated
into the United States in a way to ensure the strength of its character. Undeniably, the ideals represented in the Bill of Rights were introduced to serve
as the country's foundation. I believe that people all over the world, putting aside their abode, race, gender, sexuality, or ethnicity should be entitled to
the exact same rights. Nobody can argue with the fact that we are born equal, only our living circumstances differ. However, this does not

Bill Of Rights Essay
The Bill of Rights is, perhaps, the most important, meaningful, and controversial part of the United States Constitution. The document is one of most
influential of its kind in the history of the country. A disagreement between the Federalists and Anti
–federalists brought the first ten amendments to the
forefront all at once, making the constitution, as a whole, able to be agreed upon. As an American, each of the ten amendments is of varying
importance to the individual citizen. Subjective as it is to rank the Bill of Rights from most important to least important, ranking can shed some light on
the importance of the document to Americans from then, now and even into the future. For a long time in the history of the United States of America the
Bill of Rights was in the background and provided little controversy for the young country. Starting in the 20th century, though, the political document
has come under intense scrutiny on how to be interpreted correctly by scholars, politicians, and even normal citizens (Schwartz 13). The clarity...show
more content...
There are five main parts to this amendment that make it the most important. It prohibits the making of any laws that might confine religion, freedom
of speech, freedom of the press, right to peaceably assemble, or the right to petition government (Levy 40). There is a lot to take apart in this bill,
granting it much of its gravity. Furthermore, there is much ambiguity here for what exactly the definition of "religion" might be in the wording or
"speech" or "press" (Bodehhamer 23). The ambiguity has led to many supreme court cases having to define the reach of this amendment and how it
should be interpreted (24). This amendment has all the basics of what the forefathers were aiming for in a free society, despite the ambiguity. The root
of the rest of the Bill of Rights stems from this one, which makes it the most important of the

When the Second Constitutional Convention wrote the Constitution in 1787, there was a controversy between the federalists and the anti–federalists
surrounding whether or not to have a Bill of Rights. The anti–federalists claimed that a bill of rights was needed that listed the guaranteed rights that
the government could never take away from a person i.e. "inalienable rights." A Bill of Rights was eventually deemed necessary, and has worked for
over 210 years. There are many reasons why the ten amendments are still valid to this day, and the best examples are the First Amendment, concerning
the freedom of religion, the Fifth Amendment, and the Sixth Amendment. The Amendment I of the Bill of Rights is often called "the freedom of
speech."...show more content...
As one can see, personal freedom is an incredibly important part to our modern day society. Amendment V guarantees that a person cannot be forced
to or be put into the position to incriminate himself, makes it so that a person cannot be tried twice for the same case, or if anything is taken from a
person, it is not without "just compensation." The Fifth Amendment gives people the right to remain silent, as to not accidentally incriminate
themselves. It is only fair that the defendant is allowed to say however much, or little he or she wants. The Fifth Amendment also protects people
who have been found innocent, and if new evidence surfaces after the trial that would incriminate the defendant, the double jeopardy rule, which says
"nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb," makes it so that they cannot be brought back to trial.
Finally the Fifth Amendment compensates people who have had personal property taken or destroyed by the government. The rights given to a citizen
of the United States by the Fifth Amendment are only fair, and they are still important to this day. Amendment VI gives people the right to a quick and
public trial in front of an impartial jury. This assures a fair trial. Trying to defend in a case where the jury comes into the courthouse with the
preconceived notion that the defendant is already is nearly impossible and

Bill Of Rights Impact On Society
The enlightenment had a big impact on today's government and on us as people. For instance the bill of rights helped create and shape the laws
that we have today. People have different views on things because of what they did when the country was just beginning. We have freedom to
enjoy because of the ideas that were vocalized. The declaration of independence had a big impact because it make america its own country, and not
a part of britain. America became its own because the people didn't like how the king was treating them. He refused to follow his own laws that
would make everyone else have an easier time. It is stated in the declaration, "He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary
for the public good"(1). Our founding fathers did not like this, so we made sure that people followed the laws and no one is exempt. This was part of
the natural rights belief because everyone was given the same rules and had to follow them (equality). He also imposed taxes without asking them and
cut off trading. It is stated, "For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world: For imposing Taxes on us without our consent" (16). Meaning he didn't
let them import or export anything, and...show more content...
The first right written is the foundation to what american freedom is. Stated is, "the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, ot
of the press; or the right of the peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government of a reress of grievances" (1). We, as americans, have the
basic rights of saying, thinking, and expressing what we want to, when we want to. This is what voltaire stood by. We also don't have house soldiers
if we don't want to. Its stated, "no soldier shall, in a time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but
in a manner to be prescribed by war" (3). This was locke's

What Is The Bill Of Rights Essay
Bill of Rights Essay
Civil Disobedience was a term coined by Henry David Thoreau meaning that a certain person disobeys certain laws, demands, and commands of a
government. Not necessarily all the government laws, but certain ones that may affiliate with their beliefs or world view. Some people in the world
abuse the right and just make the world a more complicated place. Then there's some people who use it for the right purpose and get accused for
doing wrong. Yet I am not the one to judge what the world does right and does wrong. ButCivil Disobedience is a right that should be used wisely. For
example, Rosa Parks refused to move from her seat on the bus because she believed that all people should have the same right. We each have the...show
more content...
Not everyone understands it. Some people do understand what the meaning and purpose of it is. And I believe that there should be more people
like that today. Because knowledge like that shouldn't be abused. Yes. Everyone has rights. Everyone has a choice. Everyone has the free will to
make decisions of what's right and what is wrong. Of course peaceful resistance has a positive and negative impact on society. But people should
keep in mind of what they do. Their choices to act on what they believe is up to them. If you want to prove a point, prove it. It seems like everyone
just adds more fuel to the flame than you need to. Real word problems are big enough. There is no need to make it bigger. I really wish people
knew when to resist and when to speak. Sometimes people get those two mixed up. There is a lot of false accusations and false motivation for
some peoples actions. For example, when someone feels like they should kill someone because they feel like they have the right is completely
wrong. Unless it is in defense. Which in some cases, can be mistaken. I feel like the question if peaceful resistance is has a positive or negative
impact is not the best. Of course it does. You just have to know when the right time to speak is and when the right time to act

From the time it was first proposed in 1789, the Bill of Rights was controversial. The founding fathers had already considered adding a Bill of Rights
in the original 1787 Constitution, mainly because they knew the people feared a powerful central government and formally stating their rights in this
new document would appease them. They did not add it, however, thinking it was not really necessary. Each state had their own version of a Bill of
Rights anyway. The framers of the Constitution decided that just because rights were not enumerated for the individual states in the Constitution did
not mean that the federal government controlled the lives of every citizen. The debate over the Bill of Rights came down to the Federalists...show more
content...
As they are stated, each of the provisions in the Bill of Rights have both benefits and drawbacks and could have been worded differently to avoid
misinterpretation. One provision, the right to bear arms, has had both positive results and negative effects. The world seems to be growing more
uncertain. Citizens have turned to violence and the people do not have enough confidence in the police to protect them. They believe if they are
attacked, the authorities will not get there in time to save their lives. It may be true that a gun will scare away a potential attacker or prevent possible
injury to themselves or their family. Thankfully, there are specific criteria that must be met before a citizen can get a gun, so ideally only responsible
citizens will own one. People who live in remote places or places with a high crime rate may not be able to get police protection in time without their
own means of protecting themselves. Unfortunately, when there are more guns in society, they have the opportunity to get into the wrong hands.
Teenagers or even young children might set the gun off accidentally or use it for the wrong reasons. Young children might hurt themselves or others.
Angry, confused teenagers might use the gun to act on their frustrations at a confusing time in their lives. They might even be acting out the fantasies
they see in the video games they play. Even in the hands of the owner, guns tend to bring a sense of empowerment. They might become

Bill Of Rights Essay
A democratic country is the country governed directly or indirectly by people who have their sovereignty, so it has the laws to protect citizens' rights.
Most countries in the world adopt democracy, and so do the United States and South Korea. However, it doesn't mean that both countries' laws are
same. This essay will cover Bill of Rights and Korean Constitution because they are the fundamental laws of each country. Also, theUnited States has
federal system unlike Korea, which means each state has their own autonomies under their laws. The Bill of Rights indicates the first edition of ten
amendments for protecting the citizens' rights from the government. There are some similar and different points between the United States and South
Korea...show more content...
Firstly, the Second Amendment is about right for having arms and army. However, there is no Article in Korean Constitution about it and it is
illegal. Secondly, the Third Amendment is about protection from quartering of armies, but this also doesn't exist in Korean Constitution. Thirdly,
the Seventh Amendment is about civil trial by jury, and laws related to this point don't exist in Korea. However, there is a noticeable point in
Korea, which is called Civil Participation in Criminal Trials. It has been enforced since 2008 and is same with the United States in terms of having
juries, but there are two crucial differences. In Korea, jury can only participate in severe criminal cases and their verdicts have no legal binding
forces, just advisory effects. Fourthly, the Ninth Amendment is about protection of rights not specified in the Bill of Rights, and Korea does not
have laws involving this aspect naturally because the Korean Government does not adopt the Bill of Rights. Lastly, the Tenth Amendment is about
the powers of states and people, but this point is vague. The concept of powers of people can be applied to both United States and Korea, but the
concept of powers of state can't because the Korean Government does not have a federal system. Therefore, in this essay, it is categorized as
difference, but some people can regard it as same

The Bill Of Rights
Liberty is defined by Merriam–Webster as freedom from external (as governmental) restraint, compulsion, or interference in engaging in the pursuits or
conduct of one's choice to the extent that they are lawful and not harmful to others and enjoyment of the rights enjoyed by others in a society free of
arbitrary or unreasonable limitation or interference.("Liberty." Merriam–Webster, Merriam–Webster, www.merriam–webster.com/dictionary/liberty.)
James Madison expressed concern that personal freedoms may be adversely affected by abuses of power. The writers of the United States Constitution
addressed this concern via checks and balances and separation of powers. The Bill of Rights was written to specifically guarantee personal rights,
addressing Madison's concerns. The Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution contains ten amendments that address personal liberties. These
liberties include freedom of speech, religion, press, the right to bear arms and the right to a trial by jury, among others. Seven of the ten amendments
were drafted by James Madison. Madison along with John Jay and Alexander Hamilton also wrote The Federalist Papers, espousing their views on
personal freedoms and rights that they viewed should be protected by the government. These freedoms are still in place today and remain both
important and, sometimes controversial.
Madison's concerns about abuses of liberty could be valid if, for example, Black Americans were treated unfairly and in

Argumentative Essay On The Bill Of Rights
The Bill of Rights is one of the most important things in the American government .The Bill of Rights has 10 Amendments. The fifth one however is
one of the important one. The fifth Amendment deals with police procedures. Along with basic Constitutional limits, or in other words guidelines that
Congress has to follow. The Fifth Amendment is a one of the most important Amendments because it gives people the rights to speech and privacy, the
fifth doesn't let people be charged with the same felony twice, and it gives citizens the right to a fair trial.
The first reason the fifth amendment is one of the more important amendments is because it gives people the rights to speech and privacy. "No person
shall be held to answer for a capital, or other infamous crime" (Bill of Rights). This states that a person does not have to talk if they do not deem it fit.
Someone can plead the fifth and they just stated that they do not want to talk. On the other hand some might say that this is not a strong argument
because in other countries crime is limited because people have to speak. "The government continued to take controversial steps restricting media
freedom, justifying them mostly by the need to counter Russia's anti–Ukraine propaganda" (World Report 2017). This states that when banning the
freedom of social media it protects the government and country from attacks, mainly Russia. Although this is true banning the rights of social media
may cause arguments to break out. The fifth

Importance Of The Bill Of Rights Essay
Bill of Rights There are 27 amendments in the constitution. The amendments that stick out the most are 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8. This is because I think they
are the most common ones we see in our society today. In some aspects, I think the amendments that I selected may need updates due to how our
world is changing through, better rules and details. 1st Amendment: Freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly and petition. This is essential to
American tradition (Hillsdale College 17). This amendment is important because it gives the rights for the people to express themselves with their
opinion and to let their voices be heard. It is great to have this amendment in our constitution. We all need to express ourselves in our own way because
we all think...show more content...
According to one story a guy named Robert Bosley went straight to being charged with first degree assault, conspiracy to assault, and murder. He
was asked questions but never read his Miranda Rights. Now a case is happening where attorneys must relook over the interview to see what will
happen next. With the cop not reading the rights a criminal could be free (Mongilio). 8th Amendment: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor
excessive fines or cruel unusual punishment (Hillsdale College 18). Having this right protects us from outrageous bail amount, or weird punishment
done to us. This amendment is still being upheld today by getting rid of cruel and unusual punishment. In my opinion I think they should bring back
some of the punishments because having some prisoners just sitting jail is not enough. One example, would be a lady named Judy Malinowski. Her
body was 95 percent burned and now she lives her daily life in a hospital. During incident, her ex–boyfriend Michel Slager set her on fire and just
laughed while she screamed for help. He only must serve 13 years in prison (Farrell). People like Michel Slager deserves painful punishment for what
he's done to

The Bill Of Rights : The Amendment Rights
1 . Introduction In 1791, the Bill of Rights was created to specify the individual rights of every human being. Madison James is the creator of the 10
Amendments, he believed it was necessary to create the document to further explain what the Constitution will provide for each person. The Bill of
Rights gives every citizen the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, as well as the freedom of the press, and lastly the due process rights.
This document was formed when the Constitution in 1789 was drafted. Federalist viewed the Bill of Rights as an unnecessary document that the
Anti–federalist wanted in order to feel safe in knowing what the Constitution was really about and what was entitled to them. The 9th Amendment
assures you cannot be denied certain rights, even if you 're not told your rights you still have them. The 9th amendment stated the following, " the
enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be constructed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." This amendment grants
you the rights that were not specified in the first 8 Amendments. For example, you have the right to have an abortion and you won 't get in trouble
because it 's not illegal. This amendment was created to limit the power of the government over every individual. This is important for everyone so
they aren 't taken advantage. In 1965, "Griswold v. Connecticut," a supreme court case about the use of birth control. Planned Parenthood League of

Bill of Rights Essay
Introduction
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution: an amendment that guarantees three rights, one of which is the right to freedom of
expression. Under this, there resides the freedom of press. It assures that people are free to communicate through the means of media and dissemination
without governmental restraints. However, if the government desires to interfere in one's expression, the government can do so, but only with proper
justification. In such cases, a court case is necessary ("First Amendment"). One such case is New York Times Co. v.United States. In favor of the
publications made by the Times that had caused concern for the U.S. government, the final verdict was right in heeding the First Amendment, for the
...show more content...
v. United States would ensue.
The main question that probably arose was whether the president's executive order surpassed the First Amendment. First, the District Court for the
Southern District of New York judged the Times case and decided the government had not "show[ed] justification for the enforcement of such a [prior]
restraint," for it simply deemed the publication of the Pentagon Papers detrimental to the nation. Likewise, the District Court for the D.C. and the Court
of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the courts that judged the Washington Post case, came to the same verdict (New York Times Co. v. United States).
The Case: The Result* The Supreme Court case was argued on June 26, 1971 and decided on June 30, 1971. It affirmed the verdicts of the District
Court for the Southern District of New York & the District Court for D.C. and the Court of Appeals for the D.C. (New York Times Co. v. United States).
The Supreme Court's decision was supported by three main reasons. In addition to the fact that President Nixon made the restraint order without proper
justification, Justices Black, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, and Marshall, the ones who concurred with the official judgement, hesitated to take
action without the Congress's tutelage. They thought that the issues were strictly legislative, so they did not refute the First Amendment (New York
Times Co. v. United States; "The Espionage Statutes and Publication of Defense Information"). Also, per US Code–

Reflection On The Bill Of Rights
Journal entry #45: December 16, 1791 Yesterday the Bill of Rights was ratified and it is the talk of the country. I know many citizens, like myself,
and political figures are satisfied with this addition to the Constitution. Our president, George Washington, initially expressed in his inaugural
address his desire for a Bill of Rights that would display "a reverence for the characteristic rights of freemen and a regard for the public harmony..."
("Washington's Inaugural Address of 1789"). In my opinion, I feel the Bill of Rights successfully expresses the characteristics George Washington
described. This morning I was discussing the Bill of Rights with some fellow journalists, and we all agreed that we felt a sense of security knowing
our rights cannot be stripped by our government. Even though we agreed on this, I realized that we had extremely different views on which ones were
most important to us. All the amendments affect my life in a way, but some are more important to me than others. The First Amendment has provided
protection for my individual rights of speech, religion, assembly, press, and petition of government. In my opinion, the First Amendment is the most
important. As a journalist and successful newspaper writer, freedom of press and petition of government are rights that I cherish. I have many opinions
that include my view on our government and the Bill of Rights has allowed me to speak freely without any concerns. As a religious family man, the
right to

The Bill of Rights Essay
In the development process of America, its sound that legislative system has a very solid foundation for the construction of American society. The Bill
of Rights as one of the successful act in America, its importance position has never been ignored. The Bill of Rights was introduced by James Madison
and came into effect on December 15, 1791. It has given the powerful support for the improvements of American society. The Bill of Rights has become
an essential part in guaranteeing the further development of culture. The influence of The Bill of Rights can be easily found in its cultural
revolutionizing. It can not only guarantee the harmonious relationship among all the walk of society, but can also promote the construction of
harmonious...show more content...
The Bill of Rights not only enhanced the timely and validity of news communication, but also played a unique role in the reporting of the
important news events and fully satisfying people's need for information. It has become a common practice for the online media to make live
broadcasts of the Stakeholders Congresses. The role of The Bill of Rights in supervision is giving full play. The Bill of Rights has actively created
conditions for civilian to supervise the government, and attaches great importance to the role of the poor group in supervision. Civilians at all
levels are required to investigate and resolve in a timely manner all problems reported to the government by civilian via the The Bill of Rights, and
to inform civilian of the results. On the great majority of government websites, relevant email addresses and telephone numbers are made public, so
that civilians can be informed of problems by the hardworking of The Bill of Rights. In order to strength civilian's reporting of corrupt and
degenerate officials, the central discipline inspection and supervision authorities and other relevant bodies have set up informant websites. "Over 60
percent of civilians have a positive opinion to the role of The Bill of Rights in supervision, and consider it an expression of government's socialist
democracy and progress"(The Constitution and the Bill of Rights, p153). The Bill of

Bill Of Rights Unnecessary

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Bill Of Rights Unnecessary