False proofs of evolution. 2. english

1. FALSE EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION - 2
INTRODUCTION
In the first film in our “False Evidence of Evolution” series we saw some of the fake
evidence evolutionists produce as part of their efforts to keep their theory alive.
We witnessed how the theory of evolution has been refuted by science at every step
and how it is a deception maintained by means of various frauds in order to cover up
the fact of Creation.
In this second part of the series, which unmasks the true face of the theory of
evolution, we shall continue to examine the hoaxes perpetrated by some evolutionists.
We will learn with horror..
How laboratory experiments performed by evolutionists in order to bring an
evolutionary explanation to bear on how life first emerged have ended in fiasco…
How they have manufactured fake fossils by sticking together the fossil bones of
living things that existed at very different times…
How fisherman caught living specimens of the Coelacanth, which evolutionists
claimed to be a so-called intermediate form, half-fish and half-reptile, in the transition
from water to land, and the ridiculous position in which evolutionists found
themselves when it transpired to be nothing more than an ordinary species of fish…
How they misled the public by exhibiting an imaginary fossil they made from plastic
bones, depicting it as an intermediate form, in museums for some 100 years.
How they added fraud to barbarity by kidnapping an African pygmy and locking him
in a cage in American zoos, displaying him as supposed living evidence of
evolution…
THE MILLER EXPERIMENT
Evolutionists generally point unwisely to the Miller Experiment as a so-called
evidence for their deceit regarding how what they refer to as primordial life emerged
on Earth spontaneously.
The fact is, however, that this experiment, performed around half a century ago, lost
all credibility in the face of subsequent scientific discoveries.
In 1953, the American chemist Stanley Miller performed an experiment in order to
support the scenario of molecular evolution.
Miller assumed that the primordial atmosphere consisted of methane, ammonia and
hydrogen gasses.

2. He combined these gasses in an experimental apparatus and passed an electric current
through the mixture. A week or so later he saw that a few amino acids had formed in
that part of the apparatus known as the cold trap.
This caused enormous excitement among evolutionists.
Over the next 20 years, certain evolutionists such as Sydney Fox and Cyril
Ponnamperuma attempted to continue with Miller’s scenario.
Discoveries made in the 1970s, however, invalidated all these evolutionist
endeavours, known as the “primordial atmosphere experiments.”
Because scientific findings showed that the primordial atmosphere on Earth did not
consist of the gasses methane and ammonia, as Miller had hypothesised, but of
nitrogen, carbon dioxide and water vapour.
Miller had carefully selected the gasses he used in his experiment, because these were
ideally suited to the formation of amino acids.
However, the structure of the atmosphere in the primordial world was very definitely
not suited to the emergence of amino acids. It was also realised that there was a high
level of free oxygen in the primeval atmosphere.
This invalidated the evolutionist scenario, because it was obvious that free oxygen
would immediately break down amino acids.
Moreover, Miller intervened in the experiment through various conscious
mechanisms, such as the cold trap, by way of which he was able to isolate the amino
acids that formed before they could be broken down again.
Were it not for equipment such as the cold trap, a source of sparks and other
chemicals that emerged during the course of the experiment, the amino acids that
appeared would have immediately broken down again.
In this way, Miller himself destroyed the evolutionist hypotheses regarding amino
acids being able to form spontaneously under natural conditions.
Because there was no such controlled mechanism, as evolutionists claim, in the
primordial world capable of separating amino acids that might form before they were
broken down.
In conclusion, far from documenting that life could emerge spontaneously in nature,
all these efforts actually showed that it could not even be produced under laboratory
conditions.
In the light of these findings, in the 1980s the scientific world admitted that the Miller
Experiment and the “primordial atmosphere experiments” of those who came after
him were actually meaningless.

3. After a long silence, Miller himself confessed that that experiment he conducted in
1953 was a far cry from accounting for the origin of life.
The evolutionist and scientist Harold Urey, who performed the experiment in question
together with Miller, made the following admission:
All of us who study the origin of life find that the more we look into it, the more we
feel it is too complex to have evolved anywhere. We all believe as an article of faith
that life evolved from dead matter on this planet. It is just that its complexity is so
great, it is hard for us to imagine that it did.
(W. R. Bird, The origin of Species Revisited, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Co., 1991, p
325)
The 50 years or so that have passed in the meantime have served only to better display
the hopeless position of the theory of evolution at the molecular level.
Yet it is a most interesting fact that the Miller experiment is still depicted as if it is a
scientific evidence for evolution in a great many biology text books.
DINOBIRDS (ARCHAEORAPTOR)
An article published in National Geographic magazine in 1999 announced the
discovery in China of a fossil known as Archaeoraptor.
The report contained evolutionist indoctrination along the lines of “in the same way
that we can be certain that human beings are mammals, so we may be sure that birds
are THERAPODS”
Therapods are a kind of dinosaur, and the fossil discovered was depicted as definitive
proof of the idea that birds evolved from dinosaurs.
This species, which was said to have lived around 125 million years ago, was given
the name Archaeoraptor liaoningensis.
Fictitious illustrations in the magazine depicted dinosaurs covered in feathers leaping
into the air and then beginning to fly by growing wings.
Yet this fossil, announced to the accompaniment of great fanfare by National
Geographic, soon turn into a source of terrible embarrassment for the magazine,
known for its pro-Darwinist stance.
In fact, the fossil did not belong to a species exhibiting both bird and dinosaur
characteristics as National Geographic had claimed.
Although the fossil had a beak with teeth and a birdlike body, its tail resembled that of
the dinosaur known as the Dromaeosaur.
The fossil was actually a hoax.

4. It had been deliberately assembled from more than one fossil in such a way as give
the impression of representing a supposed intermediate form and used as evidence for
evolution!
Evolutionists had learned nothing from the Piltdown Man affair, in which orang utan
and human bones had been assembled together, and this time portrayed a hoax fossil
put together from dinosaur and bird bones as proof of evolution.
THE COELACANTH
Fossil fish belonging to the coelacanth class were once depicted as powerful evidence
in favour of the myth of the transition from water to dry land.
Based on the fossil remains of this animal, evolutionist biologists suggested that a
primeval lung had developed inside the creature’s body.
This lie was described in a wide range of reference sources, and illustrations showing
the coelacanth in the process of emerging from the sea onto dry land were even
published.
And all this was based on the assumption that the creature was extinct.
However, a most interesting discovery was made in the Indian Ocean on 22
December, 1938.
A living specimen of the species Latimeria, a member of the Coelacanth family
depicted as an extinct intermediate form that had lived 70 million years ago, was
caught in the open sea!
The discovery of a “living” Coelacanth came as a huge shock to evolutionists.
The evolutionist paleontologist J. L. B. Smith announced that he could not have been
more surprised if he had come across a dinosaur in the street.
More than 200 coelacanths were to be caught in other regions in the years that
followed.
With the capture of these fish it was realized that all the speculation regarding these
animals was unrealistic.
Contrary to what had been suggested, the Coelacanth had neither a primeval lung nor
a large brain.
The structure that evolutionists imagined to be a primeval lung was nothing more than
an oil sac in the fish’s body.
Moreover, the coelacanth, depicted as “a reptile to-be preparing to move out of the
water and onto the land”, was seen to be a bottom-dwelling fish living in the deepest
parts of the ocean and almost never rising above 180 metres in depth.

5. At this, the popularity of the Coelacanth in evolutionist publications immediately
disappeared. The evolutionist palaeontologist Peter Forey made this statement in an
article in Nature magazine:
The discovery of Latimeria [coelacanth] raised hopes of gathering direct information
on the transition of fish to amphibians, for there was then a long-held belief that
coelacanths were close to the ancestry of tetrapods. . . . But studies of the anatomy
and physiology of Latimeria have found this theory of relationship to be wanting and
the living coelacanth's reputation as a missing link seems unjustified."
(P. L. Forey, Nature, Vol. 336, 1988, p. 727)
Thus the most frequently used supposed intermediate form between fish and
amphibians in the propaganda of evolution was utterly discredited.
NEANDERTHAL MAN
The Neanderthals, portrayed as “the primitive ancestor of man” by evolutionists, has
been definitively shown to be a lost human race.
The Neanderthals were human beings who appeared suddenly in Europe around
100,000 years ago, and vanished just as suddenly and silently 35,000 years ago, or
else became assimilated with other races.
The only difference between them and modern man is that their skeletons were
slightly stronger and they had slightly larger skulls.
Neanderthals were a human race, and this is now agreed by just about everyone.
Evolutionists made great efforts to depict these human beings as a “primitive
species.” But all the discoveries made showed that the Neanderthals were no different
to a “well-built” person walking along the streets today.
The Neanderthals most closely resemble the eskimos living in cold climates today.
Discoveries have shown that the Neanderthals buried their dead, made musical
instruments of various kinds, and shared a highly developed culture with humans.
The New Mexico University paleoanthropologist Erik Trinkaus, regarded as an
authority on the subject, writes:
Detailed comparisons of Neanderthal skeletal remains with those of modern humans
have shown that there is nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that conclusively indicates
locomotor, manipulative, intellectual, or linguistic abilities inferior to those of modern
humans.
(Erik Trinkhaus, “Hard Times among the Neanderthals,” Natural History, Vol. 7,
December 1978, p. 10; R. L. Holloway, “The Neanderthal Brain: What Was
Primitive?”, American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, Vol. 12, 1991,
p. 94)
Today, however, scientists and researchers agree that the Neanderthals were nothing
more than a now extinct human race.

6. Thus it was that another false proof that evolutionists for years attempted to depict as
a link in the supposed evolution of man vanished from the scene.
OTA BENGA
Evolutionists looking for imaginary half-ape, half-human fossils did not regard
backing their theory up with fake fossils alone as at all adequate.
They also imagined that they might be able to find living specimens of the evidence
the needed in various parts of the world.
The result of the frantic endeavors evolutionists made in order to find living proof of
evolution once more unmasked the fanatical devotion they felt for their theory.
Evolutionists would stop at nothing in order to find evidence. But their next move was
to be far more barbaric than those that had gone before.
The barbarity committed by an evolutionist researcher by the name of Samuel Verner
in 1904 came about as the result of his search for living evidence in the Congo.
Verner captured an African pygmy known as Ota Benga, a married man and father of
two children, whom he depicted as evidence that human beings had evolved from
apes. Despite being a human being, Ota Benga was chained like an animal, kept in a
cage and taken to America.
On his arrival in America, Ota Benga was put on display in a cage with various
species of ape at the St. Louis World Fair.
Ota Benga, depicted as if the closest intermediate form to man, was transferred to the
Bronx Zoo in New York two years later.
There he was put on display as the so-called ancestor of man alongside a gorilla called
Dinah and an orang utan known as Dohung.
Evolutionist publications immediately began carrying articles about Ota Benga.
Thousands of people flooded to the zoo to catch sight of Ota Benga, who was treated
savagely just like an ordinary animal.
The director of the zoo, the evolutionist Dr. William T. Hornaday, made a number of
speeches describing his pride at having a supposed intermediate form in his zoo.
Ota Benga eventually killed himself.
This event is significant in revealing the irrationalist and unconscionable practices
that Darwinists might resort to in order to pursue the lie of evolution.

7. RECONSTRUCTIONS
Despite their abysmal failure when it comes to finding any scientific evidence with
which to support their theory, evolutionists are still remarkably successful in one
sphere: propaganda.
The most important component of that propaganda is the fake illustrations known as
“reconstructions.”
The word “reconstruction” is based on the concept of rebuilding, and is the production
of a picture or model of a living thing on the basis of nothing more than a fragment of
bone and a large amount of imagination.
All the “ape men” that so often appear in newspapers, magazines and films are in fact
imaginary reconstructions.
Inspired by fossil remains, these reconstructions are designed and produced entirely
with the aim of supporting the claims of the theory of evolution.
They are totally divorced from reality, however.
The aim behind this is to use pictures or models to convince people that the imaginary
life forms concerned did actually exist at one time.
It needs to be made crystal clear here that only the very general characteristics of a
fossil can be established from bone remains.
It is impossible, on the basis of these bone remains, to draw any conclusions regarding
the physical appearance, skin, muscle tissue, facial lines, nose, ears, eyes, hair and
similar features of a living thing.
The fact is that the details that really determine physical appearance are the soft
tissues that gradually vanish over the course of time.
Earnst A. Hooten from Harvard University describes the position by saying:
To attempt to restore the soft parts is an even more hazardous undertaking. The lips,
the eyes, the ears, and the nasal tip leave no clues on the underlying bony parts. You
can with equal facility model on a Neanderthaloid skull the features of a chimpanzee
or the lineaments of a philosopher. These alleged restorations of ancient types of man
have very little if any scientific value and are likely only to mislead the public… So
put not your trust in reconstructions.
(Earnst A. Hooten, Up from the Ape, New York, McMillan and Co, 1931, p. 332)
Evolutionists even go so far as to attribute very different facial appearances to the
same skull.
One well known example of this is the three completely different illustrations
produced of the fossil known as Zinjanthropus.

8. Evolutionists pick up their paintbrushes and draw imaginary creatures , thus try to
produce false evidence for their theories, which are in fact devoid of any scientific
proof.
In reality, however, there is absolutely no concrete fossil evidence to substantiate the
image of the imaginary “ape man” that so frequently appears in evolutionist
publications.
The way they resort to such imaginary reconstructions is an important indication of
evolutionists’ utter failure to find any real evidence.
ICHTHYOSAURUS
One of the most important difficulties facing evolutionists as they seek to keep
Darwin’s theory alive and well is the absence of any fossil that can possibly be
portrayed as an intermediate form.
Ever since the theory of evolution was first proposed, despairing evolutionists have
many times resorted to producing their own fake fossils.
Yet these efforts have always ended in utter failure.
One such instance was a fossil exhibited for 116 years as a supposed intermediate
form in the Museum of Wales.
In 1884 an evolutionist collector by the name of Samuel Allen donated an
intermediate form supposedly proving evolution to the Museum of Wales.
Museum officials imagined that this fossil, given the name Ichthyosaurus, was a
perfect example of marine reptiles.
In 2000, the fossil had to be removed for general maintenance, during which time it
emerged that the fossil was a fake.
Yet hundreds of thousands of people who had visited the museum in the meantime
had been convinced that the fossil represented evidence in favour of the theory of
evolution.
A report published in BBC News Online on 8 December, 2000, announced this fossil,
which had been displayed as supposed proof of evolution for 116 years was actually a
hoax. The dolphin-like creature in question had actually been produced by putting two
different marine creatures together.
Experts revealed that the skull and bodies had actually been buried in two different
types of rock.
The skull belonged to a species known as Ichthyosaurus communis, and the body to
another sea creature by the name of Leptonectes fenuirostris.

9. Other bones had been made from plaster and stuck inside the rock in order to give the
impression that they were genuine, and one of the fins was also a fake.
Yet for some reason, just like this one, every fake fossil alleged to constitute evidence
for evolution has been displayed for years in museums.
Another feature these fossils have in common is that nobody has confirmed whether
or not they are genuine. Museum conservator Dr. Caroline Buttler reports that despite
her many years in the profession she has never come across such a thing happening
and that it was a complete forgery:
When the plaster started crumbling and we stripped off five layers of paint we found
it was an elaborate forgery, It was an amalgam of two different types of ichthyosaurus
plus a clever attempt at fake parts.
(Daily Mirror; http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hl/wales/1059825.stm)
Over the course of more than a century hundreds of thousands of people were
deceived by a hoax fossil manufactured by evolutionists.
Yet this was neither the first nor the last of such evolutionist frauds.
Ever since the time when the theory was first launched, the absence of any evidence
to support it has been a major factor propelling encouraging evolutionists to commit
such frauds.
CONCLUSION
In this series concerning the false proofs of evolution we have seen how Darwimists
have had no qualms about resorting to all forms of deception and fraud in an attempt
to prove in their own eyes their lies true.
We have witnessed how evolutionists, who will stop at nothing in order to achieve
their aims, have produced fictitious illustrations, carried out misleading experiments,
have deliberately distorted the fossils and skulls they have discovered, deliberately
altered the fossils in their possession, adding to some and concealing others, and even
placed a human being in a cage in order to provide evidence in support of their theory.
Evolution is a theory whose scientific mask has now fallen, a deception based on
brainwashing, propaganda and fraud.
There is only one aim behind the efforts to prop up a theory so far from being
scientific, that puts forth the lie that all things, living or otherwise, human beings,
animals, plants, the Earth, the Sun the galaxies, in short the entire universe, emerged
as the result of chance.
That aim is to provide a supposed scientific foundation for the materialist and atheist
system that denies Almighty God and His Creation.
The fact is, however, that modern science has shown that it is impossible for a single
living thing, or even a single protein molecule in it, let alone the universe itself, to
have come into being by chance.

10. Everything, large or small, around us, visible to us or not, every animate and
inanimate thing, emerged through the Creation of Almighty and Omniscient Allah,
Lord of all things.
This reality, which only believers possessed of reason and conscience can truly
understand, is revealed as follows in the verses of Allah:
Allah is He Who splits the seed and kernel. He brings forth the living from the
dead, and produces the dead out of the living. That is Allah, so how are you
perverted? It is He Who splits the sky at dawn, and appoints the night as a time
of stillness and the sun and moon as a means of reckoning. That is what the
Almighty, the All-Knowing has ordained. It is He Who has appointed the stars
for you so you might be guided by them in the darkness of the land and sea. We
have made the Signs clear for people who have knowledge. It is He Who first
produced you from a single self, then from a resting-place and a repository. We
have made the Signs clear for people who understand. It is He Who sends down
water from the sky from which We bring forth growth of every kind, and from
that We bring forth the green shoots and from them We bring forth close-packed
seeds, and from the spathes of the date palm date clusters hanging down, and
gardens of grapes and olives and pomegranates, both similar and dissimilar.
Look at their fruits as they bear fruit and ripen. There are Signs in that for
people who believe.(Surat Al-An‘am ,95-99).