False proofs of evolution. 1. english

1. FALSE PROOFS OF EVOLUTION - 1
INTRODUCTION
Although the theory of evolution has been utterly discredited in every field of
science, there have been determined efforts to keep it alive, for various
ideological reasons, for over the last 150 years.
An examination of evolutionist literature shows how the evidence
evolutionists have produced, in support of their theory, has subsequently
either emerged to be fraudulent or else, scientifically invalid.
Even some leading evolutionists now agree on the fact that evolution
possesses no tangible scientific evidence, and that the supposed proofs
produced to date are all invalid and unscientific.
There are so many admissions regarding the invalidity of the theory of
evolution made by evolutionists that they could fill several volumes of books.
Yet the theory of evolution continues to receive the support that it has failed
to receive from science, from various ideological circles and part of the media,
which has assumed the responsibility for propagating these circles’
propaganda.
These circles still impose the false and misleading evidence that even
evolutionists have removed from the literature and which have been left with
absolutely no validity, on society in press and media organs, as if they still
represented scientific reality.
Their aim is to turn people away from the fact that God created them, and
thus convince them to the lie that they are individuals which came into being
by chance and descended from apes.
The aim is thus to produce large masses of people, stripped of all moral and
spiritual values, unaware, unbelieving and dehumanized, who can easily be
led in the direction desired by certain centers of power.
We need to have a sound knowledge of the true nature of the theory of
evolution and the kinds of false evidence on which it is built in order to not be
deceived by these circles with their ulterior motives.
In this film we will be examining just some of the false and misleading
evidence and deceptions that some evolutionists have come up with in order
to lead people astray over the course of the last 100 years or so.

2. THE “PILTDOWN MAN” HOAX
In 1912, a team led by a British amateur paleontologist by the name of Charles
Dawson discovered a fossil, the jaw of which exhibited ape-like
characteristics, although the cranium itself had human features.
The fossil was given the name Piltdown man and was exhibited as definitive
proof of evolution in the world’s best-known museums over the following 40
years.
The fossil possessed a number of very interesting features.
Although the cranium had quite a large volume, its jaw resembled that of an
orangutan, on which were two molar teeth, again similar to those in human
beings.
These characteristics stunned the scientific world.
A scientific classification – Eoanthropus dawsoni - was soon produced for this
fossil, which began being referred to as Piltdown Man.
It was estimated to be around 500,000 years old.
It was, thus, depicted as supposed evidence for the claim that human beings
and apes are descended from a common ancestor.
An air of rejoice immediately began dominating the evolutionist press.
The impact of the fossil on the world of paleontology was truly enormous.
So enormous that some 500 doctoral theses would be written about it over the
next 40 years until it was understood to be a hoax.
This fossil, which symbolized the alleged victory of evolution, was put on
display in the British Museum, one of the most famous in the world.
It was examined not only by famous scientists from all over the world, but
also by countless visitors. But, Piltdown Man’s victory was to be short-lived.
In 1949, Kenneth Oakley from the British Museum’s Paleontology
Department developed a new method of determining the age of fossils.
He began using this technique, to which he gave the name of the fluoride test,
on the fossils in the museum.

3. Oakley was stunned by the reality of what the test results revealed about the
Piltdown Man skull. The jawbone contained no fluoride; there was very little
in the cranium.
This meant that the jawbone was just a few years old, and the skull was a few
hundred years old at most.
As the investigations intensified, an enormous reality emerged: the fossil that
was once the best-known proof of evolution was actually a hoax!
The jawbone belonged to a recently deceased orangutan, and the cranium to a
human being who had died some 500 years previously.
On close examination, it could be seen that the teeth had been subsequently
attached to the jaw and abraded using steel tools. Finally, it had been dipped
in a solution of potassium dichromate in order to give it an ancient
appearance.
Detailed analyses by Joseph Weiner definitively proved that the fossil was a
hoax.
Le Gros Clark, a professor of anatomy from Oxford University, was one of
those scientists who revealed the fraud.
At the end of his investigations, he said:
Indeed so obvious did they [the scratches] seem it may well be asked -- how
was it that they had escaped notice before? … They had never been looked
for ... nobody previously had examined the Piltdown jaw with the idea of a
possible forgery in mind, a deliberate fabrication.
All the time and effort that scientists had put into examining and interpreting
the fossil had been devoted to an expertly manufactured hoax. Professor of
anthropology Clark Howell made the following comment:
Piltdown was discovered in 1953 to have been nothing more than an Ape's
jaw placed with a human skull. It was a hoax placed on purpose. They
recognized neither the jaw to be an ape's or the skull to be a human's. Instead,
they declared each part as an in between of ape and human. They dated it to be
500,000 years old, gave it a name (Eoanthropus Dawsoni or `Dawn Man'),
and wrote some 500 books on it. The `discovery' fooled paleontologists for
forty-five years.
HAECKEL’S FAKE ILLUSTRATIONS

4. A most famed of the supposed pieces of evidence proposed by evolutionists
was the deceptive scheme of embryo development drawn up by the
evolutionist biologist, Ernst Haeckel.
Darwin had asked Haeckel, a close friend of his, to contribute to his theory by
telling him that he would have performed a great work by disseminating the
evolutionary doctrine.
Haeckel did not turn down this request, and came up with a fictitious thesis
in order to establish evidence in favor of evolution.
He called this, “the theory of recapitulation.”
According to this thesis, during the developmental stage living embryos
undergo a short repetition of the “evolutionary process” that species
supposedly underwent.
For example, a human embryo in the mother’s womb first exhibited fish and
then reptile features, before finally turning into a human being.
However, observations and research in modern laboratories showed that all
the illustrations produced by Haeckel in order to back this theory up were
fake.
In its September 5, 1997 edition, the famous journal, Science, published an
article titled, "Haeckel's Embryos: Fraud Rediscovered." This is what was
stated:
Not only did Haeckel add or omit features, Richardson and his colleagues
report, but he also fudged the scale to exaggerate similarities among species,
even when there were 10-fold differences in size. Haeckel further blurred
differences by neglecting to name the species in most cases, as if one
representative was accurate for an entire group of animals. … "It [Haeckel's
drawing] looks like it's turning out to be one of the most famous fakes in
biology," Richardson concludes.
The magazine, New Scientist, noted this on the subject on October 16, 1999:
In fact Haeckel's strict law was soon shown to be incorrect. For instance, the
early human embryo never has functioning gills like a fish, and never
passes through stages that look like an adult reptile or monkey.
Haeckel’s deception went even further. That part of the embryo, which
Haeckel equated with the yolk sac, was actually a sac that produced blood for
the baby. The part that he claimed was a tail was subsequently realized to be

5. the human backbone, which resembled a tail because it appeared before the
legs.
Most interestingly, 100 years before he personally admitted that the
illustrations he had produced in order to support his fictitious thesis were
actually fakes:
After this compromising confession of 'forgery' I should be obliged to consider
myself condemned and annihilated if I had not the consolation of seeing side
by side with me in the prisoner's dock hundreds of fellow-culprits, among
them many of the most trusted observers and most esteemed biologists. The
great majority of all the diagrams in the best biological textbooks, treatises and
journals would incur in the same degree the charge of 'forgery,' for all of them
are inexact, and are more or less doctored, schematised and constructed.
This admission by Haeckel shows that falsehood and deception are
techniques frequently resorted to by evolutionists and that they have no
hesitations about persisting in them.
Yet, these illustrations, which everyone knew to be false, were nevertheless
taught as a scientific reality in textbooks, all over the world throughout the
course of the 20th
century.
And, they are still being taught as such today.
THE “NEBRASKA MAN” SCANDAL
In 1922, a time of intense efforts aimed at finding evidence for the theory of
evolution, Henry Fairfield Osborn, director of the American Museum of
Natural History, announced that he had discovered a fossil molar tooth
dating back to the Pliocene epoch near Snake Valley in West Nebraska.
It was commonly agreed, on the basis of one single tooth, that this belonged
to a so-called “ape-man.”
Profound scientific debates were initiated on the subject, which was in fact
nothing more than a fantasy.
This fossil, which sparked off great controversy, was given the name of
“Nebraska Man.”
Nebraska Man was also immediately given a "scientific name,"
Hesperopithecus haroldcooki.
Many authorities supported Osborn.

6. On the basis of this single tooth, reconstructions were made of Nebraska
Man’s skull and body.
They went even further and published illustrations of Nebraska Man with his
wife and children in their natural environment.
Once again evolutionists began mobilizing all the means at their disposal for a
fictitious scenario.
William Bryan, a politician from the state of Nebraska correctly maintained
that the evidence regarding Nebraska Man was totally inadequate, that the
evidence available proved nothing, and that people needed to wait for a while
longer.
Aware that they would be left without their only so-called evidence,
evolutionist scientists immediately counter-attacked and began issuing
statements to the effect that Bryan’s mindset was outdated and far from being
scientific.
Other parts of the skeleton were discovered in 1927.
According to these, the original tooth belonged neither to an ape nor a human
being. It was realized that the tooth belonged to an extinct species of
American wild boar.
An article by William Gregory, in Science magazine, which announced this
error, was titled, "HESPEROPITHECUS APPARENTLY NOT AN APE NOR
A MAN."
As a result, Hesperopithecus haroldcooki and his “family” were hurriedly
removed from the relevant literature.
Yet, as usual, evolutionists continued to behave as if nothing had happened.
THE ARCHAEOPTERYX DECEPTION
The only evidence that evolutionists point to in favor of their claims that
“birds evolved from dinosaurs” is the 150-million-year old fossil bird
Archaeopteryx, which they maintain was a half-bird and a half-dinosaur
unable to fly particularly well.
However, the latest discoveries have shown that the animal in question is
merely an extinct species of bird.

7. The fact that it lacked a “sternum,” the breastbone where the muscles
essential for flight are attached, was indicated as the most important evidence
that it was unable to fly.
The seventh Archaeopteryx fossil to be discovered in 1992, however, showed
that the creature did actually possess such a bone, contrary to what
evolutionists had imagined.
The presence of this bone proved that Archaeopteryx was a flying bird.
Evolutionists depicted the claws on its wings and, the teeth in its jaw as proof
that Archaeopteryx was an intermediate form.
But, this was distortion, rather than evidence.
Birds such as the Taouraco and the hoatzin, which are living today, also have
claws permitting them to cling onto branches.
Some other birds that lived in the past also had teeth.
The fact that Archaeopteryx had asymmetrical feathers is another indication
that it was a flying bird. This characteristic is to be found in all flying birds,
and permits them to fly by giving an aerodynamic structure.
All of these findings show that there is no foundation to the evolutionist
claims that Archaeopteryx was an intermediate form.
Despite being an evolutionist, Alan Feduccia, a professor from North Carolina
University and one of the world’s most eminent ornithologists, strongly
opposes the theory that birds are related to dinosaurs. Feduccia says:
Well, I've studied bird skulls for 25 years and I don't see any similarities
whatsoever. I just don't see it ... The [so-called] theropod origins of birds, in
my opinion, will be the greatest embarrassment of paleontology of the 20th
century.
In addition, the recent discovery of fossil flying birds that lived at the same
time as Archaeopteryx have also totally discredited the claim that Archaeopteryx
was an intermediate in the imaginary transition from dinosaurs to birds.
Of these, the beak, feathers, and skeletal structure of the 140-million-year-old
Confuciusornis, discovered in China in 1995 and more or less the same age as
Archaeopteryx, exhibit exactly the same characteristics as those of present-day
birds.

8. This totally discredits the evolutionist thesis to the effect that Archaeopteryx
was the primitive ancestor of all birds.
The 130-million-year-old fossil bird, Liaoningornis, again discovered in China
in November 1996, and the 120-million-year-old Eoalulavis, were also identical
to living birds in terms of structures and mechanisms, and they were able to
fly in a perfect manner.
In an analysis in Discover magazine, Professor Alan Feduccia stated that
Liaoningornis disproved the evolutionist thesis that birds are descended from
dinosaurs.
What is the origin of birds? This fossil [Liaoningornis] tells us that it is not
the dinosaurs.
THE MYTH OF THE PEPPERED MOTHS
The tale of the “peppered moths” is depicted as one of the major pieces of
evidence in favor of evolution in just about all biology textbooks subscribing
to the theory of evolution.
This tale is based on an experiment performed by the evolutionist British
biologist, Bernard Kettlewell, in the 1950s, and which may be summarized as
follows:
At the beginning of the industrial revolution in England, the bark on the trees
in the area around Manchester was light in color.
For that reason, dark colored moths landing on the trunks of those trees were
easily visible to birds that fed on the species, and their survival was thus,
seriously reduced.
Fifty years later, however, the death of the light colored lichen on the tree
bark, the result of industrial pollution, led to the trees becoming darker in
color.
Accordingly, during this time, light colored moths became preys for birds
more often.
This time, the number of light colored moths declined, with darker ones
multiplying because they had become invisible.
Evolutionists maintain that this is major confirmation of Darwin’s claim of
evolution by way of natural selection, and that light colored moths gradually
evolved into dark colored moths.

9. But, this is a deception.
This is because both types of moth had been in existence from the very
beginning. Both species of moth had, in fact, been seen in a moth collection
made in 1811, long before the emergence of industrial pollution in the 1850s.
There is, therefore, no question of a new species emerging by one turning into
the other.
All that had happened was a change in the numbers of already existing moth
species. The moths acquired no new organs or features that might lead to a
“species change.”
That is the general response to be given to evolutionist claims regarding the
peppered moths.
However, there is another even more interesting aspect to the subject:
In the same way that the evolutionist explanation is incorrect, it also consists
of a blatant deception. In his book, The Icons of Evolution, published in 2000,
the molecular biologist, Jonathan Wells, describes how the experiment
performed by Kettlewell was actually a scientific scandal.
“The moths,” photographed by Kettlewell, “on tree bark,” were actually dead.
Kettlewell attached these dead creatures on the tree bark with pins and
adhesives, and photographed them.
Since the moths settle on the undersides of branches rather than on the tree
trunks, Kettlewell had no means of taking any such pictures.
It was eventually realized that Kettlewell’s account of “peppered moths” was
based on a fraudulent experiment.
Researchers investigating peppered moths encountered an even more striking
state of affairs; while one would expect there to be greater numbers of light
colored moths in those parts of Britain unaffected by industrial pollution,
there were actually four times as many dark colored moths as light colored
moths.
In other words, there was no correlation between the moth populations and
tree bark of the kind claimed by Kettlewell, and repeated in just about every
evolutionist reference source.

10. This collapse of the peppered moth myth, the main element in “introductory
courses in evolution” for decades, created enormous disappointment among
evolutionists.
One of these evolutionists, Jerry Coyne, admitted thus:
My own reaction resembles the dismay attending my discovery, at the age of
six, that it was my father and not Santa who brought the presents on
Christmas Eve.
Thus, it was that, the “most famous instance of natural selection” went down
in history as a scientific scandal.
THE “EQUINE EVOLUTION” DECEIT
One of the claims espoused by adherents of the theory of evolution for many
years is the “scenario of the evolution of the horse.”
According to this imaginary scenario, a dog-like creature, known as Eohippus,
which lived some 55 million years ago during the Eocene epoch, is
supposedly the horse’s first ancestor.
This dog-like animal is then alleged to have subsequently evolved, becoming
more developed and turning into life forms bearing a closer resemblance to
the horse.
Eventually, the present-day horse emerged.
The fact is, however, that Eohippus, depicted as the so-called ancestor of the
horse and which became extinct millions of years ago, is almost identical to
the animal known as the hyrax, which is still living in Africa and has nothing
to do with the horse whatsoever.
In addition, fossils of horse species existing today have been discovered in the
same stratum as Eohippus, depicted as supposedly the earliest ancestor of the
horse.
The fact that the present-day horse and its supposed forebear were living at
one and the same time is proof that the imaginary process known as equine
evolution never happened.
The invalidity of the myth of equine evolution has been admitted by a great
many evolutionists.
Paleontologists Don Prothero and Neil Shubin’s ideas regarding the horse
sequence are as follows:

11. ... Throughout the history of horses, the species are well-marked and
static over millions of years. At high resolution, the gradualistic picture of
horse evolution becomes a complex bush of overlapping, closely related species.
It has been calculated that, the true dimensions of the living things portrayed
as the forerunners of the horse and arranged chronologically in order of size,
from small to large, in the sequence in question, have been distorted.
In his book, The Great Evolution Mystery, the evolutionist author, Gordon
Rattray Taylor, describes this deception with these words:
But the fact is that the line from Eohippus to Equus [present-day horse] is
very erratic. It is alleged to show a continual increase in size, but the truth is
that some variants were smaller than Eohippus, not larger.
In November 1980, a four-day conference attended by 150 evolutionists and
considering the problems facing the theory of evolution was held at the
Chicago Museum of Natural History.
Boyce Rensberger, one of the speakers at the conference, expressed his
thoughts in these words:
The popularly told example of horse evolution, suggesting a gradual
sequence of changes from four-toed fox-sized creatures living nearly 50
million years ago to today's much larger one-toed horse, has long been
known to be wrong.
American paleontologist Niles Eldredge has this to say on the subject:
I admit that an awful lot of that has gotten into the textbooks as though it
were true. For instance, the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs
is the exhibit on horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has
been presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook. Now I think that that
is lamentable, particularly because the people who propose these kinds of
stories themselves may be aware of the speculative nature of some of the stuff.
All of these facts have revealed that the schematic illustrations of the
supposed evolution of the horse, depicted as one of the soundest pieces of
evidence in favor of evolution, actually consist of distortions devoid of any
reality.
THE FICTITIOUS HUMAN FAMILY TREE
Evolutionists base their thesis of so-called “human evolution,” their major
claim, on fictitious and imaginary family tree diagrams.

12. They do not have the slightest evidence to support their claim that human
beings evolved.
For that reason, they manufacture their own evidence by completing the
various skull and bone fragments they collect during excavations with hoax
illustrations in whatever manner they so choose.
They give these imaginary pictures various names and create a supposed
“family tree of human evolution” by setting them out in a sequence of their
own choosing.
The “Nebraska Man” hoax, which you saw earlier in this film, is one of the
most notable examples of these imaginary representations.
Evolutionists produced images of a fictitious human ancestor on the basis of a
single tooth that would later prove to belong to a boar.
They went even further, and added representations of his wife and children.
The imaginary species to which they gave the name, Nebraska Man, was, for
years, portrayed as scientific evidence in evolutionary literature.
Naturally, evolutionists’ efforts to produce false evidence did not come to an
end with the “Nebraska Man.”
Proponents of evolution have produced countless false intermediate forms for
their imaginary family tree on the basis of various fragments of bone they
have discovered.
What encourages evolutionists to produce such false evidence is the large
numbers of fossils on which they can base their groundless speculation.
More than 6000 species of ape are known to have lived over the course of
history.
A large part of these have become extinct and disappeared.
Today, there are only 120 species of ape in the world.
Therefore, the fossil remains of around 6000 extinct species of ape represent a
rich resource for evolutionists.
Evolutionists put together skulls and bone fragments from some of these
extinct species according to their requirements.

13. They then arrange these in order of size, from small to large, and write
scenarios of human evolution by adding skulls belonging to some extinct
human races to this series.
This scenario contains a great many imaginary species that never actually
existed at all.
The false nature of all these imaginary species claimed to represent the
forerunners of human beings, such as Java man, Beijing Man, and Lucy, have
all been demonstrated over and over again.
And, evolutionists have countless times admitted that the fossils they have
submitted as evidence are a very far cry from being, in the slightest bit,
scientific.
A great many fake fossils have been proposed as so-called forerunners of
human beings, including
“Java Man,” discovered on the island of Java by the Dutch anatomist, Eugene
Dubois, and claimed, on the basis of a skull, which later transpired to belong
to a gibbon, to be a so-called ancestor of human beings.
“Beijing Man” was heralded as a forerunner of human beings on the basis of
independent bone fragments found at different times over the course of a 10-
year period in the area around Beijing. These fragments then mysteriously
disappeared, leaving behind nothing more than fantastical pictures and
models.
Then, there was the “Pithecanthropus” fossil, discovered in India in 1932, and
alleged to represent the first stage in the supposed transition from ape to man.
This was used as definitive evidence by evolutionists for 50 years, until it was
realized in 1982 that the fossil actually belonged to an ancient species of
orangutan.
The fossil known as “Lucy” was discovered by the American anthropologist,
Donald Johanson, in 1974, and was regarded as the symbol of evolution for
decades. Subsequently, even evolutionists abandoned it when it was realized
that Lucy actually belonged to an extinct form of chimpanzee.
Then, there was the skull fragment found near the town of Orce, in Spain, in
1983, announced to be the oldest human fossil in Europe and inserted into
evolutionist literature under the name of “Orce Man.” Later, it emerged that
the skull fragment actually belonged to a four-month-old donkey.
These are just a few of the hoax fossils that evolutionists have come up with in
order to provide supposed evidence for human evolution.

14. In conclusion, all the paleontological, anatomical, and biological discoveries
that have been made show that, like all other such claims, the claim of the
evolution of man is completely invalid.
The fossil record shows that throughout the course of history, human beings
have always existed as human beings, and apes have always existed as apes.
There is absolutely no concrete evidence of any familial link between human
beings and apes…
… apart from frauds, distortions, sleight of hand, misleading illustrations, and
fictitious interpretations.
THE WORLD OF SCIENCE HAS BEEN MISLED FOR 30 YEARS!
The way that every one of the false proofs, manufactured by evolutionists
over the years, has been unmasked has led evolutionists in the direction of
new and even more shameless frauds.
A recent example is the hoax maintained by one evolutionist professor for 30
years, and that only then came to light.
The fraud was announced in an article published in the August 16, 2004,
edition of the German magazine, Der Spiegel.
The report described how the evolutionary anthropologist, Professor Reiner
Protsch von Zieten, head of the Frankfurt University carbon dating laboratory
since 1973, had deliberately distorted the ages of several important fossils.
The lies told by the professor, who was forced to resign as a result of this
development, are still described as “facts” in anthropology textbooks, and the
authorities admit that radical changes need to be made in order for these to be
corrected.
According to the findings of the commission of enquiry, Professor Protsch
had systematically distorted the ages of a series of fossils unearthed in
Europe, portraying them as thousands of years older than they actually were.
The scandal regarding the evolutionist professor went even further than this.
In addition to what we have just heard, the British daily, The Guardian, wrote
that the professor had also manufactured fake fossils.

15. The Guardian account included a statement from the university, saying: “The
commission finds that Prof. Protsch has forged and manipulated scientific
facts over the past 30 years.”
The fraud came to light when fossil specimens, unearthed in Europe and
claimed by Professor Protsch to date back to the Pliocene epoch, came into
doubt. They were sent to Oxford University for further tests.
The results obtained from the university radiocarbon dating unit revealed a
complete “fiasco,” as scientists described it.
It was realized that a female skeleton, Protsch had dated as 21,300 years old,
was in fact only 3,300 years old, and another one to which he attributed an
age of 27,400 years transpired to belong to an old man who had died only
some 250 years previously.
Among the fossils to which the professor had attributed false dates was,
Hahnhöfersand Man, which evolutionists had portrayed as a highly
significant intermediate form.
The false age attributed by Protsch to Hahnhöfersand Man was 36,000 years.
Protsch declared that this fossil represented an important missing link in so-
called human evolution, and the fossil went on show in the Helms Museum in
Hamburg.
The walls of the museum were bedecked with posters depicting
Hahnhöfersand Man as an ape-man in a completely fantastical manner.
Tens of thousands of visitors flocked to the museum.
However, the fossil was actually proof of evolutionist fraud rather than
showing the validity of the theory of evolution.
An enormous deception was being perpetrated.
The truth emerged when the latest tests carried out in Oxford showed that the
fossil, which evolutionists were presenting under an ape-man guise, was in
fact only 7,500 years old.
Hahnhöfersand Man was an ordinary human being who lived a mere 2,000
years before such civilizations as Sumer and Ancient Egypt, and who had
nothing whatsoever to do with the fictitious ape-man depicted on the posters.

16. Evolutionists “manufactured” a fictitious ape-man from a human fossil and
submitted this method, the true name of which is unequivocally fraud, before
the public as “science.”
Since evolutionists are devoid of any grounds apart from false and misleading
evidence, they resort to all kinds of indoctrination, propaganda, and sleight of
hand in order to keep their theory alive.
As we have just seen, the way that evolutionists deceived tens of thousands of
people by exhibiting Protsch’s fraudulent fossil in a museum as evidence of
evolution is one of the techniques in question.
Sadly, evolutionists are still applying the same techniques and are attempting
to impose the lie of evolution on public as if it were a scientific reality.
Exhibitions of evolution held in many parts of the world are concrete
examples of evolutionist propaganda encouraging people to believe in an
unscientific theory for totally ideological reasons by displaying false evidence
of evolution.
It is high time that the proponents of evolution realized that people are much
more aware of such propaganda, which particularly targets children and
young people by mustering support from one section of the press, than was
the case in the past. This propaganda will no longer have the impact it once
did.
CONCLUSION
Modern science has proved that life and the nature is the work of an
Almighty and Omniscient Creator.
The evidence that has accumulated over the decades in such areas of science
as paleontology, microbiology, molecular biology, biochemistry, and genetics
has definitively discredited the theory of evolution and proved that it is
nothing more than a myth.
As we have seen throughout the course of this film, evolutionists are in a state
of despair because of science’s failure to provide the evidence they seek; and
they resort to “manufacturing” such evidence by unscientific means.
That is the reason for the efforts to keep the theory of evolution – the worst
deception in the history of science – on its feet by fraudulent means.
New evolutionist frauds are inevitable, so long as these efforts continue.

17. It is crystal clear, however, that opposing the facts, and especially by resorting
to deception and other unscientific methods, will continue to be a waste of
time and bear no fruit whatsoever.