1. Horses and Carts:
can policies in a post Brexit world
harness farming to more sustainable diets?
David Baldock
City University
16 November 2016
2. Farming and Food: Traditionally Different Worlds
Foster and
strengthen
agriculture
Pursue a balanced
and affordable diet
3. Some Exceptions
Wartime
Food safety regulation
Promoting “healthy” products (eg free school milk)
Recent focus on dietary change (eg discouraging sugar
consumption) impacts on market
Tobacco
4. Agricultural strategy in Europe
The post war productionist era
The progressively decoupled era; paying for farming
per se. Market forces to prevail in farmers’ choices
Payments per hectare increase the focus on land
management
Continued expectation to make sufficient supplies of
healthy food availble
Implicit assumption that feeding the world implies the
widespread adoption of a western style diet in the end
5. Not a wholly decoupled era
Still direct coupled payments within the CAP eg for
dairy cattle (over 4billion in 2015)
Other sectoral aid eg for protein crops
Geographically focused aid eg for predominantly
livestock farming in the hills and mountains
Support for post farm food chain within rural
development
Special arrangements eg for migrant labour in
horticulture
6. Food promotion budget is in fact escalating
Current CAP food promotion scheme growing from
€111million in 2016 to €133 m in 2017
Includes 60 internal European schemes and 6 aimed
abroad.
30% for fruit and vegetables and 17% for meat
7. After Brexit
The opportunity to start a new approach in the UK to
agricultural policy based on fresh objectives and
primary legislation. New rules unavoidable.
Potentially bringing a food and healthy diet dimension
into a new policy spectrum
What would be the goals?
How embedded in agricultural policy?
What would be the best mechanisms?
8. Sustainable diets
An alternative long term goal to general adoption of Western
style diets
Seeks to capture health and environmental benefits
Especially in low carbon terms
Transition to sustainable diets a public as well as private
benefit (GHG emissions from food and drink in UK about
20% of consumption emissions)
Assumes diets can be defined to some degree
9. Goals
Sustainable diets everywhere or just in the UK?
What kind of aspiration does it represent?
A direction of travel on a purely voluntary basis or a
more prescriptive approach? Timescale?
Are we confident enough about the nature of the diet
that we can build long term policy on it?
And confident about the consequences for production?
Less sugar and livestock required. Half?
10. Linking to agricultural policy
Removing perverse incentives for farmers; a more diet
neutral agricultural policy
Parameters and metrics for sustainable production chains;
understanding carbon, biodiversity and water footprints
Climate friendly versus more broadly sustainable production
A new global distribution of supply; relevance to trade
policy?
11. Closer alignment with agricultural policy
Rewarding more sustainable approaches per se; systems
(organic and beyond), farming practices, locally conceived
and delivered schemes (eg catchment based)
Witholding support from less sustainable systems
More targeted and refined versions of current agri-
environment schemes
Preference for certain products eg horticulture, orchards,
certain crops, HNV livestock?
New livestock regime?
12. Increased selectivity?
How useful and/or effective is it to subsidise production of
foods that are “under “ consumed?
To lower costs? Eg vegetables
To increase supply eg fruit and fish?
To make more locally available?
Or otherwise appealing?
Or build new relations between agriculture and the supply
chain?
Strengthen certification and labelling?
13. The Policy Window
The timetable for new policy
The likely diversity within the UK
The awareness of a new agenda
The chance for bold but workable ideas
Horses and carts