The Conference with International Participation “Contemporary World Challenges for the European Citizen”, multiplier event of the project "Searching for the Labours of Hercules" - Participants Survey

1. The Conference with International Participation
“Contemporary World Challenges for the European Citizen”
Participants Survey
Searching for the Labours of Hercules
2014-1-TR01-KA201-012990

2. The Conference with International Participation
“Contemporary World Challenges for the European Citizen”
18th of November 2016
• The conference has reunited 141 participants, who, at the end of the
conference filled in and handed over 108 feed-back forms following which,
a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the objectives and results of the
project has been carried out as well as an assessment of its success level.
• For a qualitative analysis, each item of the feed-back questionnaire has
been interpreted after grouping the answers from each item into four
categories:
a) event impact,
b) organization,
c) project quality,
d) dissemination of the results.
From the qualitative analysis, the following results which have been obtained
are represented as graphs.

3. 1. “What impressed you most in the present conference?”
a) event impact - 10% (there were answers
about: participants, guests, a big number of
schools; the implication of the teachers from
the organizational study institute),
b) organization - 20% (there were answers
about: organization; atmosphere; involved
teachers)
c) project quality - 50% (there were answers about: the quality of the presentations; the quality of the
project; the approached thematic; guests; works; participants),
d) result dissemination - 20%. (there were answers about: the dissemination of the results; discussions;
sent messages.)

4. 2. “Which, in your opinion, have been the strong points of the
conference?”
a) event impact - 10% (there were answers
about: the impact of the event; the character;
the interdisciplinarity of the presentations),
b) organization - 30% (there were answers
about: organization; bilingual RO/EN
presentation; location),
c) project quality - 50% (there were answers about: activities and participation; guests; presentations;
realized programs; approched thematic),
d) result dissemination - 10%. (there were answers about: the quality of the spread material; the
travelling guide; the on-line information)

5. 3. “Which, in your opinion, have been the weak points of the
conference?”
a) time management - 20%,
b) “there were no” or “we have not noticed
any weak points” - 75%,
c) “others” - 5%.
On ”others” there were answers like: „ I just found out about the conference”, “the time was too short”,
“the distance was too long” – participants from different parts of the country.

6. 4. “How useful do you consider the approached topic?”
received answers ranging between 0 and 5: 0 being the lowest mark, while 5 the
highest
4% - mark 2,
9% - mark 3,
31% - mark 4,
56% - mark 5.
-

7. 5. ““How useful do the final products of the project for the students’
education seem to you?”?”
received answers ranging between 0 and 5: 0 being the lowest mark, while 5 the
highest
2% - mark 2,
7% - mark 3,
22% - mark 4,
69% - mark 5.

8. 6. “Please share your impressions about the conference”
20%
30%
30%
20%

9. 6. “Please share your impressions about the conference”
a) Event impact - 20% (there were answers about: the contemporary approach of the mythological
character Hercules; the topicality of the approached problems; approached and debated thematic offer
valuable information which can enrich the knowledge and can change different social behaviour /
exchange of opinions which have supported the diversity, the tolerance and the development of
creativity; a nice conference and a useful one),
b) Organization - 30% (there were answers about: good development conditions; very good
organization; congratulations),
c) Project quality - 30% (there were answers about: an interesting conference, educational; the
conference was attractively done and the interaction between participants was allowed; interesting
presentations)
d) Dissemination of the project results - 20% (there were answers about: the desire to collaborate on-
line; a very good dissemination of results; thanks for the chance of participating to that event; thanks
because we have borrowed some ideas for the organizations of the European project reunion in our own
school).