Preparation of the first State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture
1. Preparation of the first State of the World’s
BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Julie Bélanger, CGRFA Secretariat
Global National Coordinators’ Workshop
Rome, 4 July 2016
2. The Commission on
Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
• 1983 - plant genetic resources
• 1995 - Commission’s mandate to cover all
components of biodiversity for food and
agriculture
• Permanent forum to specifically discuss
and negotiate matters relevant to all
components of biological diversity for
food and agriculture
3. The Commission’s vision
Conserving biodiversity for food and
agriculture and promoting its use in support of
global food security and sustainable
development, for present and future
generations.
4. The Commission’s cycle of work
Assessment
Policy
response
Country
Implementation
Monitoring
CGRFA
Country
Reporting
9. • Requested by the Commission
on Genetic Resources for Food
and Agriculture in 2007
• Draft to be presented at the 16th
Session of the Commission in
2017
Ongoing global assessments: BFA
10. • Variety and variability of micro-
organisms, plants and animals at
the genetic, species and ecosystem
levels that sustain the functions,
structure and processes of the agro-
ecosystem
• Ecosystem services framework
• Plant, animal, aquatic and forest
production systems
Biodiversity for food and agriculture
15. Regulating and supporting
ecosystem services
Carbon sequestration
and storage
Soil formation and
protection
Natural hazard
regulation
Water cycling
Habitat for species
Pollination
Water purification and
waste treatment
Pest and disease
regulation
Production of
oxygen/gas regulation
Maintenance of
genetic diversity
17. Guidelines for the preparation of country reports
• National and Global
• Recommended
approach
• Production systems
• Dynamic and flat
http://www.fao.org/nr/cgrfa/biodiversity/guidelines/en/
22. • Latin America and the Caribbean, Panama City, Panama, 8-10 March 2016
• Near East, Rome, Italy, 5-7 April 2016
• Europe and Central Asia, Bonn, Germany, 18-20 April 2016
• Asia, Bangkok, Thailand, 26-28 April 2016
• Pacific, Nadi, Fiji, 3-5 May 2016
• Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 24-26 May 2016
• North America, TBD
Regional consultations
23. Thank you!
For more information:
Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture:
http://www.fao.org/nr/cgrfa/cgrfa-home/en/
The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture:
http://www.fao.org/nr/cgrfa/biodiversity/sowbfa/en/
Editor's Notes
Thank you [presenter], good morning to all participants.
This presentation is intended to give an overview of the preparation of the first SOWBFA, which is one of the milestones the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture has planned in its MYPOW.
As you well know, the Commission is an intergovernmental body established by the FAO Conference in 1983 to deal with issues related to plant genetic resources.
In 1995, its mandate was broadened to cover all components of biodiversity for food and agriculture
It is the only permanent forum to specifically discuss and negotiate matters relevant to all components of biological diversity or food and agriculture
In adopting its Strategic Plan for the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture 2014-2023, the Commission agreed on its vision
The work of the Commission is organized along a Multi-year Program of work. Its work is largely country-driven, and follows a 10-year cycle.
It starts with countries report to the Commission on the state of the conservation and use of their genetic resources.
FAO prepares global assessments on the basis of these reports.
The Commission considers and (not always, but very often) agrees on policy responses, such as Global Plans of Action and reports to the FAO Conference.
Countries implement the Commission’s action plans, guidelines, codes of conduct and standards.
And, finally, bringing the story to a full circle, countries monitor and report back to the Commission their implementation measures and the impact these had at country level.
[NOTE: Scope of SOWPGR: Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA) comprise the diversity of genetic material contained in traditional varieties and modern cultivars, as well as crop wild relatives and other wild plant species that can be used now or in the future for food and agriculture]
[NOTE: Scope: genetic resources of mammalian and avian species used or potentially used for food and agriculture]
[NOTE: Scope: forest tree and other woody plant genetic resources of actual and potential value for human well-being in the broad range of management systems.
This report, reflecting the national reports on which it is based, focuses mainly on tree and larger woody species present in forests, both natural and planted. However, it also deals with tree and other woody species outside forests which are arboreal components in more open situations, including agroforestry systems, woodlands and home gardens. ]
[NOTE: Scope: farmed aquatic species and their wild relatives within national Jurisdiction]
The preparation of the SOWBFA originated from a request from the member countries of the Commission back in 2007.
As for the other assessments prepared under the aegis of the Commission, the SOWBFA is a country-driven process, which uses as primary source of information reports prepared by countries, and other sources of information such as previous assessment of GRFA, thematic studies, reports from international organizations, etc.
At its last regular session in January 2015, the Commission requested FAO to present a draft report at its next regular session in January 2017.
The commission requested that this assessment not only synthesizes the previous SOWs, but looks at the complete biodiversity that is relevant for food and agriculture. This means the diversity of micro-organisms, plants and animals at the genetic, species and ecosystem levels that sustain the functions, structure and processes of the food and agriculture production systems.
For this assessment, the Commission also requested that an ecosystem services and functions framework be used to report on the biodiversity that is relevant to food and agriculture in the plant, animal, aquatic and forest production systems.
For all these assessments, National Focal Points, or National Coordinators, are appointed by their governments to coordinate within their country their national assessment, and as appropriate, the implementation of a policy response.
NFP can be appointed for more than one role, and in some cases, the National Coordinator for AnGR is also the NFP for SOWBFA.
Given the scope of the SOWBFA, NFP have been encouraged to consult and involve the NFP for other sectors of GR in their country. We also invite you to click on the links on this page to find out who is your country is coordinating activities for the SOWBFA, or other activities related to the Commission.
Going back to the scope of the SOWBFA, for this assessment, the Commission also requested that an ecosystem services and functions framework be used to report on the biodiversity that is relevant to food and agriculture in the plant, animal, aquatic and forest production systems.
Four types of ecosystem services have been defined: Provisioning services, Regulating services, Supporting services and cultural services.
Examples of provisioning services include the provision of food (including milk, egg, meat, fruits, vegetables, cereals), fibre, fuel, wood and other products used by humankind.
Provisioning services are the main scope of the reports published to date. The SOWBFA report will provide an integrated analysis of provisioning ec. serc., using as basis the reports on the state of the world’s plant, forest and animal genetic resources
Provisioning services also include wild foods of plant, animal and other origins.
At the core of this report are the regulating and supporting ecosystem services biodiversity provides in and around production systems, in support to the sustainable production of food and agricultural products.
For example, ….
In their reporting for the Second SOWAnGR, countries have reported on the ecosystem services other than provisioning that are provided by livestock. This information is also reflected in the SOWBFA.
There are also thousands of species and varieties of plants, vertebrates, invertebrates and micro-organisms, most of them still unidentified, that are providing supporting and regulating ecosystem services within production systems. They are referred to as associated biodiversity – i.e. biodiversity associated to food and agriculture production, and are the principal components of BFA that are assessed in the SOWBFA.
FAO has prepared guidelines to help countries…similarly to what was done for the reporting for the SOWAnGR 2.
There are examples of countries who have published their reports.
As of June, more than 120 countries [TO UPDATE] have nominated a National Focal Point for the preparation of a country report, and we are aware of several others who are in the process of obtaining an official nomination.
As of June
Total 70 submissions
34 final
Messages that resonated in all regions were that assessing one country’s BFA is a challenging task, and that improved coordination at all levels is needed. The detailed outcomes of the consultations will be consolidated and described in a document that will be presented in January at the regular Session of the Commission