1. SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE· BUILDING· DESIGN
MEASUREMENT II (QSB60204)
1
STUDENT NAMES : _______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
ASSESSMENT
CRITERIA
100%
EXCELLENT (80-
100)
GOOD (65-79)
SATISFACTORY
(50-64)
POOR (40-49) FAIL (0-39) SCORE
ABILITY TO DO
BILLING IN PROPER
SEQUENCE (BQ)
20%
Excellent heading and
sub-headings; logical
and proper sequence
of presentation of
items.
Accurate heading
and sub-headings;
logical and proper
sequence of
presentation of
items.
The sequence of
items is generally
accepted.
There is no
sequence.
Unable to do
billing at all.
INTERPRETATION OF
SMM2 CLAUSES
(PRINCIPLES) AND
DRAWINGS, TAKING
OFF LIST
10%
Excellent usage of
relevant clause or
citation; referencing
(excellent
interpretation),
drawing
interpretation, taking
off list and quantity
unit.
Accurate usage of
relevant clause or
citation; proper
referencing (perfect
interpretation),
drawing
interpretation,
accurate taking off
list and quantity unit.
Can interpret the
clause, drawing,
taking off list and
unit with minor error.
Can interpret the
relevant clause,
drawing, taking off
list and unit with
major error.
Unable to
interpret; totally
wrong
QUERIES
CONFIRMATION
10%
Excellent queries and
assumption
Good queries and
assumption
Reasonable queries
and assumption
Poor queries and
assumption on the
existing information.
No queries and
assumption at
all.

2. SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE· BUILDING· DESIGN
MEASUREMENT II (QSB60204)
2
ABILITY TO DESCRIBE
ACCURATELY
(DESCRIPTION)
20%
Perfect description
including the flow of
description.
Good description
including the flow of
description.
Clear and generally
acceptable; the
sequence of
arrangement is
satisfactory.
Weak in describing
the item.
Unable to
describe.
ABILITY TO MEASURE
PROPER DIMENSION
AND SIDE CAST
30%
Excellent and perfect
dimension and
calculations
Accurate dimension
and calculations.
Generally accepted
with minor errors.
Major errors in
calculation and
dimensions.
Wrong
calculation and
dimensions.
ABILITY TO WORK IN
AND MANAGE
GROUPS TO ACHIEVE
A POSITIVE OUTCOME
10%
Very clear and well
structured discussion
of how the group
works and the
individual contribution
is accurate,
reasonable and
believable.
Clear and good
structured
discussion of how
the group works and
the individual
contribution is
accurate,
reasonable and
believable.
Adequate structured
discussion and the
individual
contribution is fairly
accurate,
reasonable and
believable.
Very little
explanation of how
the group has
worked and
individual
contribution.
No comments
on group
experiences with
no indication of
how the group
works or their
contribution.
TOTAL MARKS