Land Revenue Systems in British India
Land revenue was one of the major sources of income for Britishers in India. There were broadly three types of land revenue policies in existence during the British rule in India.
Before independence, there were three major types of land tenure systems prevailing in the country:
The Zamindari System
The Mahalwari System
The Ryotwari System
The basic difference in these systems was regarding the mode of payment of land revenue.
ssues with the Zamindari System
For the Cultivators: In villages, the cultivators found the system oppressive and exploitative as the rent they paid to the zamindar was very high while his right on the land was quite insecure.
The cultivators often had to take loan to pay the rents, on failing to pay the rent, they were evicted from the land.
For the Zamindars: The revenue had been fixed so high that the zamindars found it difficult to pay, and those who failed to pay the revenue lost their zamindari.
The zamindars were not so keen about improving the land. As long as they could give out the land and get rent, they preferred it.
For the Company: By the first decade of the 19th century, the cultivation slowly expanded and prices rose in the market.
Although this meant an increase in the income of Zamindars, it was no gain for the company since it could not increase a revenue demand that had been settled permanently.
The Ryotwari System
In the British territories in southern India, there was a move away from the idea of Permanent Settlement.
A system that came to be known as the Ryotwari System, was devised by Captain Alexander Read and Sir Thomas Munro at the end of the 18th century and introduced by the latter when he was governor of Madras Presidency (1819–26).
Under the Ryotwari system, the land revenue was paid by the farmers directly to the state.
In this system, the Individual cultivator called Ryot had full rights regarding sale, transfer, and leasing of the land.
The ryots could not be evicted from their land as long as they paid the rent.
It was prevalent in most of southern India, first introduced in Tamil Nadu. It was later extended to Maharashtra, Berar, East Punjab, Coorg and Assam.
The advantages of this system were the elimination of middlemen, who often oppressed villagers.
Issues with the Ryotwari System
This system gave much power to subordinate revenue officials, whose activities were inadequately supervised.
The system was dominated by the mahajans and moneylenders who granted loans to cultivators by mortgaging their land.
The moneylenders exploited the cultivators and evicted them from their land in case of loan default.
The Mahalwari System
By the early 19th century, the Company officials were convinced that the system of revenue had to be changed again.
The revenues cannot be fixed permanently at such a time when the Company needed more money to meet its expenses of administration and trade.
Development of British Revenue Policies & their Impact on Indian Agriculture.pptx
1. Topic : Development of British Revenue Policies &
their Impact on Indian Agriculture.
REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION BHOPAL, NCERT
HISTORY
-By
DEEPTI KUMARI
B.A. B.ED. 3rd Semester
Roll No:. 06 1. https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fqph.cf2.qu
oracdn.net%2Fmain-qimg-95ebecb9537ed1975958f377afa1586f-
lq&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.quora.com%2FWhat-is-
Ryotwari-system&tbnid=01x-
VcZY2DGyYM&vet=12ahUKEwjHqrjgs877AhWBKbcAHRsGB5kQMygAe
gQIARAr..i&docid=RxN1dws2I9IbgM&w=602&h=667&q=land%20reve
nue%20system%20under%20british%20rule%20in%20india%20map&
ved=2ahUKEwjHqrjgs877AhWBKbcAHRsGB5kQMygAegQIARAr
2. https://encrypted-
tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT6f2qvwToOUlAr0WiIUeRjQw
VrHBcyj2wVTZQM5YtdtDQLKK_j
2. Topics to be covered
A Brief Background
of land tenure
system
1765 (A turning
point)
Izaredari System
Zamindari or
Permanent
Settlement System
Ryotwari System
Mahalwari System
Some other Land
tenure systems
Impact of British
Land revenue
policies on Indian
agriculture
Conclusion
3. Background
• During Mughal rule and Akbar’s land survey for
fixation of revenue.
• Revenue was 1/3rd of total produce, from
cultivator.
• In 18th century - Mughal Empire start declining –
(Results – Unable to collect taxes effectively).
• Emergence of Zamindars and Taluqdars .
• Corruption increases .
• Hereditary system and Mughal Emperor & Nawab
of Bengal weak to remove them.
https://encrypted-
tbn0.gstatic.com/images?
q=tbn:ANd9GcSs1nGliUBS
IhFJMJZKGVI8Rd99nmHCi
pHbXT3dT0FYw26VLxT4
6. After the Battle
of Buxar
(1764)
East India Company received the grant
of Diwani (Rights of revenue
collection) of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa,
from the Mughal Emperor Shah Alam
II in 1765.
8. Revenue
Collection Chart
This chart clearly shows
the increment in revenue
collection by EIC which
completely disorganized
the Agrarian economy of
Bengal.
https://www.youtube.co
m/watch?v=hr8iEjn2JY4
9. A Turning Point
(1765)
In 1765 EIC got Diwani rights .
Trade to Revenue Demand
Need for revenue collection :
• Purchase of raw material
• Cost of Maintaining troops
• Salary of Englishmen
• Cost of administration
18. Area of different
land tenure systems
under British Rule
https://encrypted-
tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=
tbn:ANd9GcQl7IrfUkmSxT-
vm2SU083OirVlkZmFAUO3S
SicxT3AijcnFti9
19. Permanent Settlement /
Zamindari System
o By whom – Lord Cornwallis (1786-93)
o Under permanent settlement Act
1793
o When – 1793
o Where – Bengal ,Bihar and Orissa and
Banaras of UP, North Karnataka .
https://encrypted-
tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=t
bn:ANd9GcQF0I0u4kCrUDg_lf
StmYlie5zvQVUAsYq3htswX_
QbmgmQvrZT
20. Idea On Permanent
Settlement
• John Shore was against the Idea of
concluding permanent settlement before
Survey of the Land and capabilities of
peasant.
• But Cornwallis conclude to impose
permanent settlement system In March 1793
because court of directors also support his
idea.
John Shore Lord Cornwallis
https://encrypted-
tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjoB2OHNOi6zcZLi
Aq-NaKsNr54Q_H5bn__kAuX-KOH8FBm8ig
https://encrypted-
tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQidZTYH1YB9U_Y
zmz6x-XMD88tdNdyxVaRMFm_OWT_ML4oeHcg
21. Aim of
Permanent
Settlement
To resolve the problem of
agrarian crisis and distress that
had resulted in lower
agriculture output.
Generate regular Income
22. CONDITION LEADING TO PERMANENT SETTLEMENT
https://www.youtube.co
m/watch?v=gaPRbNiLufQ
23. PLANNING OF EAST INDIA COMPANY
https://www.youtube.co
m/watch?v=gaPRbNiLufQ
24. EAST INDIA COMPANY TAKING FIXED REVENUE
https://www.youtube.co
m/watch?v=gaPRbNiLufQ
25. Concept Behind
Permanent
Settlement
Regular flow of tax income .
Investment in agriculture by
landlords
Investment by landlords and
increment in surplus
Zamindars will become loyal to
britishers
26. EAST INDIA COMPANY INTRODUCED SETTLEMENT PLAN
https://www.youtube.co
m/watch?v=gaPRbNiLufQ
27. Features of
Permanent
Settlement
Covers 19% of the British territories (Bengal, Bihar
& Orissa).
Zamindars role as landlords ,and hand to pay fixed
revenue otherwise their land included in bidding
“ Sunset Law “ introduced in 1794.
Zamindar could sell or transfer his land.
In this system, the zamindars got 1/9th part while
gave 8/9th to the government.
32. Reason
Behind It’s
Failure
For the Cultivators
(Oppressive and Exploitable)
For the Zamindars
1. Had to lost zamindari when can not collect revenue on time
2. They did not invest Surplus in the Land
3. Absentee Landlords : Landlords were living away from their
villages
For the East India Company
(Settled system & Decreasing profits )
37. Ryotwari Settlement
• By whom :- Col. Read, 1792 (started) and
Thomas. Munroe, 1820 (Formally established).
• Where:- Started from Baramahal
district/Madras presidency, later spread to
Bombay, parts of Assam & Coorg provinces
38. Features of Ryotwari Settlement
• Ryot – Persian word
• No intermediary like Zamindar.
• Ryot was owner of the land in this system .
• Land revenue was fixed for 20-40 yrs at a time.
• Revenue rates for dry land –50% and revenue rates for
irrigated land - 60%.
• Implemented on 51% area under British control.
• Revenue was not fixed permanently so EIC can increase
it in case of more production.
39. MERIT No middleman
Peasants were
now masters of
their land
Increment in
Production =
Increment in
revenue
EIC got support of
peasant at starting
DEMERIT Domination of
moneylenders
There was no any
proper land
assessment
Most exploitative
system.
Expensive system
for EIC
Corruption among
officials increases
For Peasants
For Peasants
For EIC
For EIC
40. Analysis of
Ryotwari
System
It was not practically possible to collect revenue in
a systematic manner from multiple ryots.
Emergence of intermediaries and decaying of
system.
Even in condition of extreme drought And flood
ryot had to pay revenue partially or wholly in cash.
Ultimately land was given to moneylenders. So, at
the end this system failed due to all these reasons.
41. Mahalwari System
o By whom :- Holt Mackenzie
o When :- 1822
o Where :- Punjab, Awadh, Agra, parts
of Orissa ,M.P. ,Ganga valley and
Northwest frontier provinces.
42. Features of
Mahalwari System
Divided lands into Mahals – village / group of villages
Revenue collected by Lambardar (head of mahal).
Peasants had the ownership rights .
This settlement was agreed upon for 30 yrs.
Cultivation carried out individually, but revenue was paid
collectively .
Implemented on 30% area Under British control.
Modified zamindari system .
43. Merits of Mahalwari
System
• It was quicker and efficient system.
• Due to this system income of government
was fixed.
• The government’s revenue has been
stabilized
44. Demerits of
Mahalwari System
High land revenue
Survey was practically based on faulty
assumptions which lead to increase in corruption
Productivity of land start declining (Fragmentation
of land )
Food crops to cash crops (result – decrement in
food surplus)
45. ANALYSIS
When the system started peasants thought that
the village headman collect revenue so they will
be saved from dealing with corrupt revenue
officers, but this not happened sometimes
company spend more for the collection then the
revenue collected consequently the system was
regarded as a failure.
47. Impacts of this
policies on Indian
agriculture
Vastly different from traditional land revenue system & made
land a saleable commodity.
Excessive tax demand +rigidity in tax collection = Turned the
Indian rural economy down.
Increment in power of moneylenders .
Increment in population of landless labour.
Due to High revenue demands Ryots fled the countryside and
villages became deserted.
Food scarcity and famines.
Land revenue was now paid in cash.
Continue…
48. Impacts of this
policies on Indian
agriculture
Spread of practice of bonded labour.
Commercialization of agriculture affect rural society:
1. Only benefit rich farmers – Increase inequality
2. Revenue in cash
3. Regional specialization of agricultural crops .
Importance of panchayat declined.
Emergence of different social classes : landlords, tenants and labourers.
This land revenue systems harm the productivity of land .
49. Conclusion
The effects of this drastic change are still
felt today. In 21st century our
government is still trying to uplift its
farmers from poverty, poor yields, money
lenders and other problems left behind
by the company model and still for its
remedy government brought many
policies .