Essay History Of The Scientific Method

Essay History of the Scientific Method
Scientific method is the way scientists learn and study the world around them. It is the process by which scientists work over a period of time to
construct an accurate (i.e. reliable, consistent and non–arbitrary) representation of the world. In the study of natural phenomenon, personal and cultural
beliefs strongly influence our interpretations and perceptions. Scientific method relies on standard procedures to minimize these influences when
developing a theory.
Scientific method consists of four steps:
(1)– Making an observation of a phenomenon.
(2)– Formulating a hypotheses to explain the phenomenon.
(3)– Proving the hypotheses correct by a series of experiments and tests. If the experiments do not bear out the hypotheses,...show more content...
Almost 2000 years later Galileo challenged Aristotle's s work on mechanics and cosmology. Galileo did not ridicule Aristotle, but simply showed that he
had jumped to the wrong conclusions and derived at inadequate answers because of his physics being not very mathematical. Errors in Aristotle's work
were rectified through direct observation and by the availability of new instruments and experimentation techniques in the 17th century. Amongst other
contributions, Galileo contradicted Aristotle's view that bodies naturally returned to their natural place. It is believed that Galileo demonstrated by
throwing different weights from the Leaning Tower of Pisa that the weight of the bodies was irrelevant to their speed of falling and only the density of
the medium counted.
Lavoisier interpreted facts discovered by others and corrected them for errors. He is considered the father of chemistry although he discovered no new
chemical substances apart from a few new chemical facts. Lavoiser used to carry out a lot of experiments, quantify their results and take various
precautionary measures. He studied Stahl`s theory on combustion and found errors in reasoning. Stahl had given the concept 'phlogiston' for
combustion but Lavoiser proved that no such thing existed. Lavoisier repeated Boyle`s experiments which had showed an increase in the weight of cal
of tin when
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Scientific Method Essay
The Scientific Method is the standardized procedure that scientists are supposed to follow when conducting experiments, in order to try to construct a
reliable, consistent, and non–arbitrary representation of our surroundings. To follow the Scientific Method is to stick very tightly to a order of
experimentation. First, the scientist must observe the phenomenon of interest. Next, the scientist must propose a hypothesis, or idea in which the
experiments will be based around. Then, through repeated experimentation, the hypothesis can either be proven false or become a theory. If the
hypothesis is proven to be false, the scientist must reformulate his or her ideas and come up with another hypothesis, and the experimentation begins
again. This...show more content...
Furthermore, flies were observed laying eggs where the maggots formed. Thus, he concluded that maggots are the result of flies, not spontaneous
generation. He then called the principles behind his experiment "Metodo Scientifico" or The Scientific Method.
The first cases of what would be considered properly using the Scientific Method can be found earlier, though, back in the studies of Galileo, early
in the 17th century. He first observed that heavy objects gain speed as they fall. He then proposed, or hypothesized, that the rate of falling of massive
objects was proportional to the distance that the object has fallen. Following the Scientific Method, he tested his hypothesis and found it to be false,
since objects falling unequal distances do not fall in the same amount of time, as his hypothesis led to. Since his hypothesis failed, he made a new one,
which proposed that the rate at which an object falls is directly proportional to the time the object has spent falling. This was tested by rolling balls
down an inclined plane and calculating the speed and time values from those observations. Later, these experiments led to the discovery of the
gravitational constant g, and a better understanding of the Scientific Method.
The Method has been used many times since Galileo conducted his experiments, and it has been considered a valid way of conducting experiments since

Scientific Method
Knowledge and Scientific Methods As we talk about scientific thinking in class, we come upon the term of critical thinking to describe scientific
thinking. When evaluating any sort of scientific claims, we must make sure that we are able to justify them and ignore any evidence that can blind
from the truth. When we think scientifically, we must look at all the possibilities which are crucial to help us think critically. There are some
explanations that need more evidence than what we really see because sometimes we do not see all the truth behind the reasoning, which include the
six principles. Those six principles are ruling out rival hypothesis, correlation vs. causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims and last
...show more content...
We found that many scientist have been trying to research stem cells for a while now. Because it is a very controversial topic, many seems to not
agree with this idea as stated in (Rehman, 2014). It takes so much research to be able to find out the results that stem cells can actually have. In the
stem cell research they claim that they can have specialized cells (embryotic cells), to help produce more cells that able to cure other diseases. Since
this research take a lot of time and embryotic cells to do it makes the research harder to do. In this claim I think that the principle of replicability is
necessary in order to make sure that this claim can actually help in bone–narrow and other things. If we are not sure that this cannot help certain
diseases as it claims then why should be using the embryotic cells on research that does not help. For these reason, having this research replicable by
many people is an important factor to find the effectiveness of this procedure. Since bone–narrow is common we must replicate this process to make
sure that this claim can be used in the future as this article states. Just like this article stated above said, we must use our six principles of scientific
thinking when looking at claims to make sure that our claims are true or not, which in this case included

Essay On Scientific Method
The Usefulness of the Scientific Method The development of the scientific method in the late 1500's to the early 1600's was a crucial stepping–stone in
the science community. The scientific method is based upon observations, hypotheses and experimentation. The concept is rather simple, and can be
applied to many areas of study. Once an observation is made, the observer can make a hypothesis as to why that phenomenon occurs and can then
design an experiment to prove whether or not that hypotheses is valid. Although the scientific method has been extremely useful in the discovery of
various things from usages of medications to studying animal behavior, there are still those who question the usage of this tool. These critics claim that
since...show more content...
There are several disease that are we still do not know much about despite copious amounts of research. Cancer and Alzheimer's are two major
examples of these mysterious diseases. Although the scientific method is useful in the development and research on various medications and
treatments, there are still limitations. Patients react to treatments in various ways, because bodies and systems vary from person to person. There is
simply too many variable to be able to pinpoint the exact reaction a patient may have. Clinical trials and studies can narrow down these reactions
down to a list of possible side effects, but doctors can never know for sure how a patient will respond. There are many unknowns and treating actual
patients is much different that conducting an experiment investigating how two medications will effect an experimental unit. During a designed
experiment, the experimenter can control all the variables except for the experimental variable and get clear straightforward results. On the other
hand, when treating a real patient with a severe illness, such as cancer, the physician has to keep an eye on all body systems. They cannot simple give
all of their attention to the area of the body that is currently affected. In these practical settings, there is simply too many variables for the scientific
method to be as useful as it normally

Scientific Method
Science is an objective method used explain the natural phenomena of the universe. The practice of a scientific method provides a detailed outline that
contributes to expressing how to determine if a theory is scientific. A continual cycle that emphasizes the techniques of observations, questions,
hypothesis, prediction, experiment, and conclusion. The complications that arise when applying the scientific method to all theories is that science is
subject to change; therefore, it is hard to modify extensive ideas to a few simplified steps. A scientific explanation depends on existing experimental
theories to validate or disprove present and future logical arguments. This is because previous observations support abstract methods that may not be
testable and the continual change is dependent on specific predictions and discoveries.
Many aspects of scientific knowledge are hypothetical ideas, however, they contribute the same level of importance compared to a logical fact. A
scientific explanation is shaped from existing intelligence to develop future studies and...show more content...
Science is revised constantly; progressive observations that support and expand on existing ideas are documented. When new knowledge is interpreted
by scientists, they must perform a series of experimental trials. These observations can either confirm or contradict the analysis, both are beneficial to
resolving the experiment. Scientific explanations are dependent of proof. For example, when a new theory is published, the scientific method for the
examination is accessible for others to review. The public has the capacity to acquire the experiment's reports and contribute that data to their own
hypothesis. Science is justified through the combination of solutions. Current ideas are continually challenged by others attempting to modify and
simplify them into a universal

Why Do We Use Scientific Method
In all of our lives we have used the Scientific Method one way or another. Sometimes we don't realize that we are using it in our day to day lives.
One way I have used it recently is with my dog Chance. My dog Chance is a young and active dog. He always wants to play with his toys or
walking with us through the neighborhood. One day he started to not act like his usual self. He wouldn't touch his favorite ball, he would not eat or
beg for food, and he didn't want to go on walks. This is when I started to use the scientific method in my life. First I started my observation about the
dog. I had to know why he was acting so different. I walked around my house to find any clues I possibly could. I walked into living room to find
my sisters basketball. Instead of finding her solid basketball, I found a gaping hole in the side. I furthered my observation skills and noticed bike
marks around the deflated ball also. I wrote this down to keep track of all the clues I to help my dog. Then I went to the bathroom and found that
the trash was dumped over. One room after the other the trash seemed to be messed up in a way. Trash would be outside of the can ripped or
shredded. Other times I would fine the trash can completely on its side. I took from what I had observed and formed a hypothesis. My hypothesis was
that the dog had eaten...show more content...
I formed another experiment by observing whether or not Chance was still getting sick. The answer I found was, no. He was not getting sick since I
carefully hid the things that made him sick. Sometimes we need to check our hypothesis more than once and revise some of the steps in the scientific
method. Luckily I did not have to do that many times since the answer was clear after the first time through the method. Now Chance is happy and
healthy thanks to the scientific

Scientific Method in Real Life Essay
Scientific method paper
Part I. It was the finals of the 2004 swimming state championships. I was seated second in the 100–yard individual breaststroke. My heart was
pounding as I swam my warm up laps. I would have to drop about a second or so to have any shot at the title and the gold. I hopped out of the
warm up pool, and headed over to grab my towel and work out a strategy plan with my coach. The first order of business was to address the main
problem. I needed to win. My coach had gathered information on my competition. We knew her best personal times, the way she trained, and how
much she had rested for this meet. From all of this info being hurriedly spoken to in my ear, as I made my way to the blocks, enabled me to...show more
content...
Then it was time to test the hypothesis, make an experimental design, and make our observations. I made my move on the third lap, and ended up
winning the race. Here the actual race was the experimental design, from which my coach and I were able to make the observations that sense I
won, our hypothesis was indeed correct. We could have made a graph showing all the racers in the race if we would have liked. We then were able to
support the hypothesis, and also publish any types of results we would have liked. My personnel experience coincides with the scientific method all the
way through. We unknowingly pretty much did all of the steps in the scientific method on our own accord. The ones left out such as the graphs were
not necessary for my specific problem.
Part II. I am currently dealing with the problem of cooking a salmon dinner for my boyfriend. I am a good cook, and really good baker, but I am
not as familiar nor as comfortable using the grill. This would be my problem. I need to do a good job grilling salmon for him for our anniversary
dinner. So I first need to identify the problem at hand, which is needing to cook a successful meal. Next, the scientific method states that I need to
collect information on how to accomplish this task. I went to the local bookstore and bought a book on ways to grill your favorite foods. Now it
would be time for me to form my hypothesis. My hypothesis is that if I grill the salmon for 20 minutes on 450

Five Step Scientific Method
The scientific method is a five step processes that is observation and research, hypothesis, prediction, experimentation, and conclusion. In the
observation and research stage it is the first step to understanding a problem, this would require research. The hypothesis is having a possible answer
to a problem or outcome. The prediction is the answer based on if the hypothesis is true or not and if it is true than an assumed prediction can be
made. Finally when all the guess work is done it is time to experiment to find the answer. The experiment stage can answer the problem or answer an
unattended problem. The conclusion is the answer that the conclusion gives but this doesn't mean there is am solution for the problem ("Scientific
Method," n.d.)....show more content...
Every genuine test of a scientific theory, then, is logically an attempt to refute or to falsify it, and one genuine counter–instance falsifies the whole
theory. In...theory of demarcation is based upon ... perception of the logical asymmetry which holds between verification and falsification: it is
logically impossible to conclusively verify a universal proposition by reference to experience ..., but a single counter–instance conclusively falsifies the
corresponding universal law. In a word, an exception, far from 'proving' a rule, conclusively refutes it (Thornton,

Scientific Method
Scientific Method Scientific Method is considered a series of systematic steps and tools that leads to scientific knowledge. These steps allow us to
carry out an investigation. Arises as a result of the experience that man has accumulated throughout its history such as the transformation that has been
going on in the field of some experimental sciences. It is based on a series of steps and procedures organized for the entire cycle of an investigation.
(Makafoosh, 1979)
Exploratory research: is considered the first scientific approach to a problem. It is used when it has not yet been addressed or has not been
sufficiently studied and the conditions are not yet decisive. To explore a relatively unknown have a wide spectrum of media to...show more content...
The deductive thinking of general categories to make statements about particular cases. Going from the general to the particular. It is a form of
reasoning in which a conclusion is inferred from one or more premises.
Abductive Reasoning: Abduction (from the Latin word abductio and ab–from afar–ducere carry) is a type of reasoning initially evidenced by Aristotle
in the Analytica prioress (II, 25), such reasoning operates with a kind of syllogism where the major premise is considered certain while the minor
premise is only probable, therefore the conclusion which can be reached with the same degree of probability that the minor premise.
Problem: A problem is usually a matter of a solution is expected. It may refer to:
– In mathematics, a problem is a question about mathematical objects and structures that requires explanation and demonstration. These questions can
be very specific ("What are the real solutions of x ВІ + 1 = 0?") Or quite general ("Why do these numbers appear in apparently very different?
Formulate and prove a conjecture").
– In society, a problem can be a particular social issue that, if solved, would lead to social benefits such as increased productivity or reduced
confrontation between the parties concerned. To expose a problem, and make the first proposals to fix it, you should hear the caller for more
information, and ask questions, and clarify any questions.
– In religion, a problem may an

The Scientific Method Of Science Essay
The Scientific Method
Introduction
The Scientific Method is defined as "a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic
observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses." The scientific method is used throughout the
world which makes it a uniform way to systematically conduct experiments. The guidelines in this method are used so that anyone can repeat the
experiment as accurate as possible every time the experiment is done. All measurements in the scientific world are made in metric measurements so
there is a uniform system of measurement. The Scientific Method has steps that are taken to get faster, more accurate results. The first step is to make
observations over the subject you are testing. This includes studying previous data over the topic under investigation, and making your own
observations. Step number two is to form a testable hypothesis. Also, by forming a hypothesis the scientist can plan out how the experiment will be
conducted. If the scientist has a well prepared hypothesis they should be able to make a prediction of what the results of the experiment will be. After
the hypothesis has been formed it is time for the experiment. With the experiment the hypothesis will be tested, data will be obtained, and the results
will be concluded. The data will also be used to reject, support, or to modify the hypothesis. Step number four is to analyze

Scientific Method
Scientists are individuals who analyze how the world is viewed and how it came to be. They perceive nature, physics, and social realms. They help
flourish the world into something great, they create the future, and discover Earth's hidden secrets. There are many categories of science, each category
has extensive scientific knowledge, and the use of the scientific method. Scientists have been changing the world since the beginning of history.
There's a wide range of different types of scientists, from studying rocks to examining the earth's atmosphere. Each one of these scientists have certain
names that have to deal with what they study. A geologist is one who studies rocks and the development of earth. (http://www.sciencekids.co.nz
/sciencefacts/careers.html)...show more content...
Scientist have been changing the world since the beginning of history. From communicating to eating and walking. Compared to today's life, Science
has dramatically changed human life.
Works Cited
"The 50 Top Research Universities." bestcollegereviews. Best College Reviews, n.d. Web. 6 Mar. 2016. .
"How long did it take you to become a scientist and is it difficult?" Science Line. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Mar. 2016. .
Mastin, Luke. "ALBERT EINSTEIN (1879– 1955)." Physics of the Universe. N.p., 2009. Web. 22 Mar. 2016. .
Perkowitz, Sydney. "E = mc2 Equation." britannica. EncyclopГ¦dia Britannica, Inc., 25 Nov. 2015. Web. 6 Mar. 2016. .
"Science Jobs & Careers." Science Kids. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Mar. 2016. .
"Scientific Thought: Facts, Hypotheses, Theories, and all that stuff." gly. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Mar. 2016. .
"Scientist Titles (Non–faculty Positions)." icahn. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, n.d. Web. 7 Mar. 2016. .
Siegfried, Tom. "Top 10 revolutionary scientific theories." science news. Society for Science & the Public, 13 Nov. 2013. Web. 22 Mar. 2016. .
"Steps of the Scientific Method." sciencebuddies. Science Buddies, n.d. Web. 6 Mar. 2016.

Scientific Theory Essay
Scientific Theory
A scientific theory is a well–substantiated explanation of some aspects of the natural world, based on a body of knowledge that has been repeatedly
confirmed through observation and experiment. Scientist creates scientific theories from hypothesis that have been corroborated through the scientific
method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, which is
measured by its ability to make falsifiable predictions with respect to the phenomena. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and
comprehensive for of scientific knowledge.
The scientific method involves the proposal and testing of hypotheses, by deriving...show more content...
Theories are the main goal in science and no explanation can achieve a higher rank. (to the belief that "theories" become "laws" over time). In some
cases, theories can unify. Two or more theories can be replaces by a single theory which explains the previous theories as approximations or special
cases, comparable to the way a theorys is connecting explanation for many confirmed hypotheses: This is reffered to as Unification of Theories. Both
scientific laws and scientific theories are produced from scientific methods through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the
behavior of the natural world. Both are typically supported by observation and experimental science. However, scientific laws are descriptive accounts
of how nature will behave under certain conditions. Scientific theories are broader in scope, and give overarching explanations of how nature works
and why it exhibits certain characteristics. They are supported by evidence from many different sources, and may contain one or more laws.
Both scientific laws and scientific theories come from the scientific method through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the
behavior of the natural world. Both are usually well supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. However laws are descriptive accounts of
how nature will behave under certain conditions. Assumption is a

Scientific Method
Utilizing The Scientific Method
SCI110, Introduction to Science
May 1, 2015
The Scientific method is a process that scientists use to solve a problem. It generally involves four distinct steps that constitute the "Scientific Method".
This paper describes the steps of the scientific method, and its application in a real–world scenario we experienced.
Step 1: Formulating a Problem
Formulating a problem can range from simple to difficult solutions to a problem. In order to solve a problem, you must first know what the problem
is. To begin with we can determine what the problem is not, just based on facts known by yourself, coworkers, friends or family. By asking a question,
eliminating...show more content...
When the water level in the sump pit rises, this switch turns on the pump. This pumps the water out of the pit and into a pipe which ejects the drainage
water out of the house and (hopefully) far away from the house."
With the sump pump installed, we waited for severe rainstorms to hit before observing the results. After one light storm, there was no flooding. But
after a second, more severe storm, the floor continued to take on water, which led us to the Conclusion that either the flooding was not due to the rising
water table, or the sump pump was ineffective at stopping the rising water table.
At that point we decided to observe the flow of water outside during the next big storm. When it finally hit, we went outside and observed a
significant amount of water flowing straight down the wall just outside the walkway, from the top of the walkway under the deck. Once again, the
walkway floor took on water. We revised ourHypothesis to state that the basement walkway was flooding due to water flowing directly down the
exterior wall, underground, where it entered gaps in the wall to the walkway.
Our solution to test the Hypothesis was to install a gutter under the deck, under the flashing which separated the walkway roof to the walkway exterior
wall. This would catch rain water and funnel it away from the wall, therefore preventing water from flowing directly down the wall where it could
enter the walkway

Scientific Method Step Essay
Scientific Method Matching Exercise Resource
In Part I, match each example from Column 2 with the correct step of the scientific method in Column 1. Explain the reasoning for your choice in Part
II.
Part I
Column 1: Scientific Method Steps
__g_ Observe
__c_ Ask a question
__a_ Create a hypothesis
__b_ Conduct an experiment
__d_ Collect data
__f_ Interpret results
__e_ Report results
Column 2: Examples of Tasks
1)
a) A scientist, based on hisobservation of the pond, believes that if a pond is exposed to the waste of an industrial plant, then the growth of algae will
be accelerated.
2)
b) In her laboratory, a scientist pours a vial of waste water, collected from the industrial plant, and adds it to a dish containing pond water. A
...show
more content...
Information that is gathered and analyzed by the collection of information investigated. Why, when, what, and how does the information work or does
not work.
3) The "Examples of Tasks" I selected for theScientific Method Step: "Create a hypothesis" is accurate because:

The creation of a hypothesis are the answers of the questions that are formulated through why, when, what, and how. This an educated guess based on
the observation and questions asked during the observation and questions asked.
4) The "Examples of Tasks" I selected for the Scientific Method Step: "Conduct an experiment" is accurate because:
Conducting experiment, is when the scientist have questions they want answers to, also wanting to know how things work. This will mean to finding
out the facts or to come up with a new theory.
5) The "Examples of Tasks" I selected for the Scientific Method Step: "Collect data" is accurate because: As the observation of algae, the
information must be recorded as how it is seen. The information that is collected during the process of the experiment, are not to be altered from what
is observed. This is a recording of all of what has been viewed at the time of growth, color or any changes.
6) The "Examples of Tasks" I selected for the Scientific Method Step: "Interpret results" is accurate because:
Interpret results, is

Scientific Method
Science in the early childhood classroom is mostly over looked. In the article Using the Scientific Method to Guide Learning: An Integrated Approach
to Early Childhood Curriculum, by Gerde, Schachter, and Wasik, they focus on weaving the steps of the scientific method into all aspects of learning
from English Language Arts to Math. Gerde, Schachter, and Wasik contend that, incorporating thescientific method into the already existing
framework of the early childhood classroom, it will lead to a better understanding of science concepts later on. The article also gives specific examples
of how to combine a child's natural curiosity about a topic such as worms, into several Literacy and Math lessons. These lessons naturally allow for the
incorporation of the scientific method which includes the following steps:
1.Observation
2.Asking questions
3.Generating hypotheses and predictions
4.Experimentation or testing of a hypothesis
5.Summarizing or analyzing data to draw a conclusion
6.Communicating discovery and process to others :verbally or in writing
7.Identifying a new question.
The example lesson on worms focuses on Literacy and Math concepts such as, incorporating oral language, new vocabulary, understanding print
concepts, data analysis, and writing. The scientific method allows for teachers and...show more content...
The state and local school boards have teachers focusing on Literacy and Math instruction to the exclusion of Science and Social Studies instruction.
The trend is to focus on meeting pupil progression goals and student learning targets in order for teachers to keep their jobs. This article has great ideas
for how to implement Science inquiry into every day lessons, but I find it may be difficult for teachers who are presently overwhelmed with meeting
the current state, district, and school goals to implement this

The Scientific Method Of Everyday Life Essay
Scientific method in everyday life:– Science plays an important part in our life. We have used science from stone age. Man observes and understands
what he observes. This is a unique sense that he is born with.
Agriculture is a scientific process. The man has learnt to sow seeds, water the land, add green manure to the soil and reap the harvest. Separating
the paddy from the husk shows how clever he is. You might have observed that the women hold the pounded paddy in a flat plate and sift when the
breeze blows. The heavy paddy falls near the person 's feet while the husk that is light flies and falls a few feet away. Thus paddy is separated from
the husk. Man also has learnt from observation that the crops should be rotated to get back the lost nutrients of the soil. This is one of the scientific
method we observe in everyday life.
Gardening:– Man knows how to garden by observation. He knows that the sunlight and water are necessary for the seeds to germinate. He has
learnt by experience that the soil should be rich for the plants to grow. He also has observed that the seed must be healthy to germinate. Man also
has learnt from experience that diseased seed produce diseased plants. Hence he first checks the seed to see if it is healthy. The Chinese way to
check the seed is to soak the seed that is selected for planting in salt water. If the seed floats on the water, it is discarded. If the seed goes to the
bottom of the vessel, then it is healthy and can be used for

The Importance Of The Scientific Method
The scientific method in the twenty–first century represents a major role of testing our hypothesis' whether it is in the industry, school, market, or in
our lives. We are constantly coming up with theories or ideas and conducting experiments on these ideas without even realizing it. The scientific
method allows us to expand our knowledge in certain fields that we are mastered in or helps us learn new possibilities that we are not aware of. The
use of chemistry and the scientific method is important to incorporate into our lives and society.
The scientific method is defined as " a way of learning that emphasizes observation and experimentation– to understand the world" (Tro, 2015, p. 6).
The scientific method involves major characteristics such as an observation. When making an observation, it can simply be by looking at a sample
with your eyes or by using instruments that can make observing a sample easier, such as a microscope. Next, the scientist would formulate a hypothesis.
Formulating a hypothesis is simply stating what the scientist observed and what they want to explore and measure. Following the creating of a
hypothesis comes conducting an experiment using the hypothesis. Conducting an experiment is a "highly controlled observations designed to validate
or invalidate hypotheses" (Tro, 2015, p. 6). Lastly, the scientific method concludes with laws and theories. In some cases, experiments and observations
can lead to the development of a

Scientific Method Essay
Scientific method what comes to mind? Do we start thinking of some type of formal process that will answer all our scientific questions or
problems? When I was in school many years ago, we were taught that scientists go through a series of steps to find a solution to a problem or find
evidence to support or disprove a theory. It all seemed rather cold, and formal. Going back to school, school has taught me that science has undergone
significant changes and has moved away from the rigidity of a fixed series of steps in what was formerly called the scientific method. I think the best
way to describe what helps me understand scientific method, is trying to shed some light on the uncertainties through...show more content...
What I have found is that a lot of research on adult learner has been done only performed recently. If we go back to the first half of the twenty first
century, organization theory was dominated by classicists who viewed organizations as rational systems and valued efficient operations above all.
They promoted the idea that management is a process of planning, organization, command, coordination n, and control and that design of an
organization should be like that of a machine. This concept spawned the modern bureaucracy. (Morgan, 1997a) Morgan's points out those
organizations could be considered cold and dehumanizing, so we are suppose to think of organizations as machines? As we interact everyday with
many organizations that are bureaucracies such the schools we attend, the bank we keep our money. Bureaucracies have been a very successful
because they work and they are efficient. They have been consistence and persisted because this gives the manager control over the people. This
concept was ingrained in managers. This theory was scientificly management was developed by Fredrick Taylor during the early

The Scientific Method is the approach that scientists use to investigate some phenomena. It's a standard technique to find cause and effect of a
particular problem.
I am going to introduce how the scientific method works using interesting research paper "Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation, the Neighborhood
Socioeconomic Environment, and Obesity among Blacks and Mexican Americans". There are a series of steps that scientists used to understand the
problem.
The first step of the scientific method is observation of phenomena. The authors of article observed a high rate of obesity. In such a case they began
their investigation with making a number of different observations concerning obesity.
So once they decided what to investigate, the...show more content...
Goal of the experiment was to determine the effect of racial and ethnic residential segregation, the neighborhood socioeconomic environment on level
of obesity. So to know if our hypothesis is correct was used cross–sectional data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey on
approximately 5000 black and Mexican–American adult participants who was living in disadvantaged segregated neighborhoods (1999–2006). These
areas were chosen for the experiment because they implied as poor with limited access to health–promoting resources. Segregation could impact the
obesity level, which had increased for blacks and Mexican Americans. So to prove the hypothesis was conducted experiment which determines the
impact of racial/ethnic segregation with limiting opportunities on the level of obesity.
During the experiment were calculated obesity body mass index and were identified participants who were obese in areas of black and Mexican
American segregations. Having carefully recorded data is very important during the experiment because it could lead to more correct conclusion. So for
accurate recording of observation some of participants were excluded from the experiment because was missing the information about their height or
weight, educational level, income, or because some of them were

Essay History Of The Scientific Method

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Essay History Of The Scientific Method

Similar to Essay History Of The Scientific Method (6)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay History Of The Scientific Method