SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 71
Download to read offline
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
In case of buildings, the maximum service live load
deflection is usually limited to L /360.
This limit is considered invisible not damaging the
surface finishes.
The deflections may be limited to L/1500 or L /2000
for structures supporting delicate machinery.
In case of bridge, deflections due to live and impact
loads are restricted to L /800.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
During initial proportioning of steel beams, it is
customary to indirectly control deflections by limiting
the span-over-depth ratio (L /d ratio) for the
members.
When these conditions are satisfied it is more likely
that the deflection check, to be performed later on,
will be satisfied eliminating the need for greater
number of trials to get a reasonable section.
Typical span-over-depth ratios used for various
types of members are as under:
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
1- For buildings, L/d ratio is usually limited to a
maximum of 5500 / Fy.
L /d £ 5500 / Fy
 dmin = Fy L /5500 (L /22 for A36 steel)
2- For bridge components and other beams
subjected to impact or vibratory loads,
L /d £ 20
3- For roof purlins,
L /d £ 6900 / Fy (27.5 for A36 steel,
sometimes relaxed to a value equal to 30)
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
The actual expected deflections may be calculated
using the mechanics principles.
However, results given in Manuals and Handbooks
may also be used directly.
Some of the typical deflection formulas are
reproduced here.
1- For uniformly loaded and simply supported
beams,
Dmax =
EI
w
384
5 4
ll
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
2- For uniformly loaded continuous beams,
Dmidspan = [Mc – 0.1(Ma + Mb)]
Where Mc = magnitude of central moment,
Ma, Mb = magnitude of end moments.
EI48
5 2
l
3- For simply supported beams subjected to
point load (refer to Figure 4.16),
Dmidspan = where a £ L/ 2( )22
4
3
12
a
EI
aP
-l
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
a b
P
4- For overhanging part of beam subjected to
UDL,
a
No Load
w per meter
l
Dmax @ ( )a
EI
aw
34
24
3
+l
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
5. For the above case, with UDL also present
within supports,
Dmax @ ( )332
34
24
aa
EI
aw
+-ll
6- For overhanging part of beam subjected to
point load,
P
No load
al
Dmax =
( )
EI
aaP
3
2
+l
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS
Write Known Data
Estimate self-weight of the member.
a. The self-weight may be taken as 10 percent
of the applied dead UDL or dead point load
distributed over all the length.
b. If only live load is applied, self-weight may
be taken equal to 5 percent of its magnitude.
c. In case only factored loads are given, self-
wt. may be taken equal to 3 % of the given loads.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Calculate Factored Loads
Draw B.M. and S.F. Diagrams
Calculate Cb For Each Unbraced Segment
Find Mu,max, Vu,max, Lb for each segment and guess
which segment is the most critical.
Design this segment first and then check for
others.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Assume the section to be compact without LTB in
the start and calculate Zx accordingly.
Assumed Zx,req = fb = 0.9 ;
Fy = 250 MPa for A36 steel
yb
u
F
M
f
6
10´
Zsel ³ Zreq
Selection of Section Minimum weight
d ³ dmin
dmin = For Dmax = L/360
5500
lyF
= L /22 for A36 steel and simply supported beams
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
For Dmax required to be lesser than L /360, like L /500
or L /800, find (Ix)req from the deflection formula, with
only the live load acting, and select section such that Ix
³ (Ix)req.
Method 1 Use Of Selection Tables
1. Enter the column headed Zx and find a value
equal to or just greater than the plastic
section modulus required.
2. The beam corresponding to this value in the
shape column and all beams above it have
sufficient flexural strength based on these
parameters.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
3. The first beam appearing in boldface type
(top of a group) adjacent to or above the
required Zx is the lightest suitable section.
4. If the beam must have to satisfy a certain
depth or minimum moment of inertia
criterion, proceed up the column headed
“Shape” until a beam fulfilling the
requirements is reached.
5. If Cb > 1.0, use Lm in place of Lp for the
approximate selection.
6. If Lb is larger than Lm of the selected section,
use the unbraced design charts.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
7. Apply moment capacity, shear capacity,
deflection and all other checks.
8. The column headed fbMp may also be used
in place of the Zx column in the above
method.
Method 2: Use Of Unbraced Design Charts
This method is applicable in cases where the
above method is not fully applicable and Lb ³ Lp.
The design charts are basically developed for
uniform moment case with Cb = 1.0.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Following notation is used to separate full plastic,
inelastic LTB, and elastic LTB ranges:
Solid Circle represents Lp
Hollow Circle represents Lr
1. According to Mu in kN-m units and Lb in
meters, enter into the charts.
2. Any section represented by a curve to the
right and above ( ) the point selected
in No. 1 will have a greater allowed unbraced
length and a greater moment capacity than
the required values of the two parameters.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
3. A dashed line section is not an economical
solution.
If dashed section is encountered while
moving in top-right direction, proceed
further upwards and to the right till the first
solid line section is obtained.
Select the corresponding section as the trial
section, and it will be the lightest available
section for the requirements.
4. If Cb > 1.0, use Mu,req = Mu / Cb but check
that the selected section has fbMp > Mu.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Check the three conditions of compact section for
internal stability, namely,
1. web continuously connected with flange,
2. flange stability criterion, and
3. web stability criterion.
If any one out of the above three is not satisfied,
revise the section.
Either calculate Lp, Lr, and Lm or find their values
from beam selection tables.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Lp = (mm)
= 0.05 ry (m) for A36 steel
yfy FEr76.1
Lr =
2
7.0
76.611
7.0
95.1 ÷÷
ø
ö
çç
è
æ
++
cJ
hS
E
F
hS
cJ
F
E
r oxy
oxy
ts
Mr = 0.7Fy Sx/106 kN-m
= =
for doubly symmetric I-sections
2
tsr
x
wy
S
CI
x
oy
S
hI
2
c = 1.0 for a doubly symmetric I-shape
ho = d – tf
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
BF =
pr
rp
LL
MM
-
-
Lm = Lp + £ Lr÷÷
ø
ö
çç
è
æ -
b
bp
C
C
BF
M 1
Calculate design flexural strength:
1- If Lb £ Lm Mn = Mp = Zx Fy / 106 (kN – m)
2- If Lm < Lb £ Lr Mn = Cb [Mp – BF(Lb – Lp)]
£ Mp (kN – m)
3- If Lb > Lr Mn = CbFcrSx £ Mp
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
where Fcr =
2
2
2
078.01 ÷÷
ø
ö
çç
è
æ
+
÷÷
ø
ö
çç
è
æ ts
b
ox
ts
b
b
r
L
hS
cJ
r
L
EC p
Bending strength check:
Mu £ fbMn OK
If not satisfied revise the trial selection.
Shear check:
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
For £ 2.24 (= 63.4 for A36 steel)
Cv = 1.0
wt
h
ywFE /
fv Vn = Fyw Aw Cv (kN)
1000
6.09.0 ´
If not satisfied, revise the section.
Deflection check:
Find Dact due to service live loads.
Dact £ L/360 or other specified limit OK
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Check self-weight:
Calculated self weight £ 1.2 ´ assumed self
weight OK
Otherwise, revise the loads and repeat the
calculations.
Write final selection using standard designation.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Example 4.1: BEAMS WITH CONTINUOUS
LATERAL SUPPORT
Design a 7m long simply supported I-section beam
subjected to service live load of 5 kN/m and
imposed dead load of 6 kN/m, as shown in Figure
4.18. The compression flange is continuously
supported.
Use (a) A36 steel and (b) steel with fy = 345 MPa
and permissible live load deflection of span / 450.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Solution:
In beams with continuous lateral support,
unbraced length is not applicable or it may be
assumed equal to zero in calculations.
Assumed self weight = 10% of
superimposed DL
= 0.6 kN/m
wu = 1.2D + 1.6L
= 1.2 ´ 6.6 + 1.6 ´ 5
= 15.92 kN/m
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
97.51 kN-m
B.M.D.
15.92 kN/m
55.72 kN55.72 kN
7 m
55.72 kN
55.72 kN
S.F.D.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
If the beam is continuously braced, Cb value is not
applicable but may be considered equal to 1.0 in case it is
required in the formulas.
Mu = Mmax = 97.51 kN-m
Vu = Vmax = 55.72 kN
Compression flange continuously braced.
(a) A36 Steel
Assuming the section to be internally compact and
knowing that there is no LTB,
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
(Zx)req = = = 433.4 ´ 103 mm3
yb
u
F
M
f
6
10´
2509.0
1051.97 6
´
´
dmin = = 318 mm
22
7000
Zsel ³ Zreq
Selection of section Min. weight section
d ³ dmin
Consulting beam selection tables (Reference-1),
following result is obtained:
W310 ´ 32.7 provides sufficient strength but
depth is little lesser.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Select W360 ´ 32.9; Zx = 544 ´ 103 mm3
Check internal compactness of section as under:
1. web is continuously connected OK
2. = 7.5 < lp = 10.8 OK
3. = 53.3< lp =107 OK
f
f
t2
b
wt
h
 The section is internally compact.
Continuously braced conditions imply: Lb < Lp
and Cb = not included in formulas
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
fbMn = fbMp
= 0.9 ´ 544 ´ 103 ´ 250 / 106 @ 121 kN-m
Mu = 97.51 kN-m < fbMp OK
h/tw =53.3 < 63.4
Þ shear yield formula is applicable
fvVn = FywAwCv
= ´ 250 ´ 349 ´ 5.8 ´ 1.0
= 273.27 kN
1000
6.09.0 ´
1000
6.09.0 ´
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Vu = 55.72 (kN) < fvVn OK
Dact due to service live load =
= = 9.44 mm
EI
w 4
384
5 ll
´
( )
4
4
108280200000
70005
384
5
´´
´
´
Dall = L/360 = 7000 / 360 = 19.44 mm
Dact < Dall OK
Self-weight = = 0.32 kN/m
1000
81.99.32 ´
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
This is lesser than assumed self-weight of 0.6 kN/m in
the start. OK
Final Selection: W360 ´ 32.9
(b) Steel With Fy = 345 MPa
Assuming the section to be internally compact and
knowing that there is no LTB,
(Zx)req = = = 314.0 ´ 103 mm3
yb
u
F
M
f
6
10´
3459.0
1051.97 6
´
´
dmin = = 438 mm
16
7000
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
This dmin is much larger, so the direct deflection criteria
will be used.
EI
wL
4
384
5
450
ll
=
=
= 5024 ´ 104 mm4
E
w
I L
req
3
384
4505 l´
=
200000
70005
384
4505 3
´´
Zsel ³ Zreq
Selection of section Min. weight section
I ³ Imin
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Consulting beam selection tables (Reference-1),
following result is obtained:
W310 ´ 28.3 provides sufficient strength and
moment of inertia.
Ix = 5410 ´ 104 mm4 ; Zx = 405 ´ 103 mm3
Check internal compactness of section as under:
1. web is continuously connected OK
2. bf / 2tf = 5.7 < lp = 9.1 OK
3. h / tw= 46.2 < lp =90.5 OK
 The section is internally compact.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Continuously braced conditions imply: Lb < Lp
and Cb = N.A.
fbMn = fbMp
= 0.9 ´ 405 ´ 103 ´ 345 / 106
@ 125.8 kN-m
Mu = 97.51 kN-m < fbMp OK
h/tw =53.3 < = 53.9
Þ shear yield formula is applicable
yFE /24.2
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
fvVn = FywAwCv
= ´ 345 ´ 309 ´ 6.0 ´ 1.0
= 345.40 kN
1000
6.09.0 ´
1000
6.09.0 ´
Vu = 55.72 (kN) < fvVn OK
Dact < Dall Already satisfied OK
Self-weight = = 0.28 kN/m
1000
81.93.28 ´
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
This is lesser than assumed self-weight of 0.6 kN/m in
the start. OK
Final Selection: W310 ´ 28.3
Example 4.2: BEAMS WITH COMPRESSION
FLANGE LATERALY SUPPORTED (BRACED)
AT REACTION POINTS ONLY
Design the beam of Figure 4.19 with the lateral
bracing only provided at the reaction points.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
wD = 8 kN/m
wL = 10 kN/m
3.5m3.5m
PD = 60 kN
PL = 50 kN
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Solution:
Self load = 0.1
= 1.7 kN/m
÷
ø
ö
ç
è
æ
+
7
60
8
wu = 1.2 ´ 9.7 + 1.6 ´ 10
= 27.64 kN/m
Pu = 1.2 ´ 60 + 1.6 ´ 50
= 152 kN
The factored loading and the shear force and bending
moment diagrams are shown in Figure 4.20.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
172.74 kN
172.74 kN S.F.D.
76
76
B.M.D.
169.30 kN-m
266.00 kN-m
wu = 27.64 kN/m
172.74 kN172.74 kN 3.5m3.5m
Pu = 152 kN
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Calculation of Cb:
MB = Mmax = 435.3 kN-m
MA = MC = 172.4 ´ 1.75 – 27.64 ´ 1.752/2
= 259.97 kN-m
Cb = Rm = 1.24
£ 3.0 (where Rm = 1.0)
97.259630.4355.6
30.4355.12
´+´
´
Mmax = 435.3 kN-m : Vmax = 172.74 kN : Lb = 7 m
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Assuming the section to be internally compact with no LTB,
(Zx)req =
= = 1935 ´ 103 mm3
dmin. = L/22 = 7000/22 = 318 mm
yb
u
F
M
f
6
10´
2509.0
103.435 6
´
´
Zsel ³ Zreq
Selection of section Min. weight section
d ³ dmin
Using beam selection tables of Reference-1,
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Trial section: W610 ´ 82
Mp = 549.00 kN-m, Mr = 327.25 kN-m,
BF = 64.99, Lr = 5.10 m
Lp = 1.67 m : Lm = 1.67 + = 3.33 m÷
ø
ö
ç
è
æ -
24.1
124.1
99.64
00.549
Lb >> Lm Þ revise the section using beam
selection charts of Reference-1
For Lb = 7m and Mu,eq = 435.3 / 1.24 = 351.05 kN-
m, from design charts of Reference-1,
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Select W410 ´ 100
fbMp = 479.25 kN-m > Mu OK
d > dmin OK
Check internal compactness of section:
1- web is continuously connected OK
2- = 7.7< lp = 10.8 OK
3- = 35.9 < lp = 107 OK
 The section is internally compact.
f
f
t
b
2
wt
h
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Lp = 3.11 m
Lr = 10.00 m
BF = 28.53 kN
Mp = 532.50 kN-m
Lm = Lp + £ Lr
Lm = 3.11 + = 6.72 m
÷÷
ø
ö
çç
è
æ -
b
bp
C
C
BF
M 1
÷
ø
ö
ç
è
æ -
24.1
124.1
53.28
50.532
Lm < Lb £ Lr:
fbMn = Cb ´ fb [Mp – BF(Lb - Lp)] £ fbMp
= 1.24 ´ 0.9 [532.50 – 28.53(7.00 - 3.11)]
= 470.44 kN-m
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Mu = 435.3 kN-m £ fbMn OK
h/tw = 35.9 < 63.4 Þ
fvVn = Fyw Aw Cv
= ´ 250 ´ 415 ´ 10.0 ´ 1.0
= 560.25 kN
1000
6.09.0 ´
1000
6.09.0 ´
Vu = 172.74 kN < fvVn OK
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Dact = ( ) ( ) ( )( )22
44
4
3500700075.0
103970020000012
350050000
1039700200000
700010
384
5
-´
´´´
´
+
´´
´
´
= 3.94 + 4.50 = 8.44 mm
L/360 = 19.44 mm
Dact < L/360 OK
Self weight = = 0.981 kN/m
< 1.7 kN/m assumed in the start OK
1000
81.9100´
Final Selection: W410 ´ 100
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Example 4.3: BEAMS WITH COMPRESSION
FLANGE LATERALLY SUPPORTED AT
INTERVALS
Design the beam of Figure 4.21, ignoring self-weight
and deflection check. Compression flange is laterally
supported at points A, B and C.
Solution:
The factored loading and the shear force and bending
moment diagrams are shown in Figure 4.21.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
7m 8m 6m
A C
B
D
PD =35 kN
PL =30 kN
PD =60 kN
PL =50 kN
wD =3 kN/m
wL =2 kN/m
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Pu =90 kNPu =152 kN
wu =6.8 kN/m
208.04 kN81.56 kN
9090
118.04118.04
33.96
81.56
S.F.D.
(-)
(+)
540.00 kN-m
404.32 kN-m
B.M.D.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Mu = Mmax = 540 kN-m
Mu = 404.32 kN-m for portion AC
Mu = 540.00 kN-m for portions CB and BD
Vu = Vmax = 118.04 kN
Lb for portion AC = 7 m
Lb for portion CB = 8 m
Lb for portion BD = 6 m
Calculation of Cb:
i) Portion AC
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
M = 81.56 x – 6.8 x2/2
Mmax = 404.32 kN-m
MA = 132.32 kN-m (x = 1.75 m)
MB = 243.81 kN-m (x = 3.50 m)
MC = 334.48 kN-m (x = 5.25 m)
Cb = Rm
£ 3.0 (where Rm = 1.0)
= 1.49
48.334381.243432.132332.4045.2
32.4045.12
´+´+´+´
´
ii) Portion CB
M = 540 – 118.04 x (x starts from the end B)
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Mmax = 540.00 kN-m
MA = 303.92 kN-m (x = 2 m)
MB = 67.84 kN-m (x = 4 m)
MC = 168.24 kN-m (x = 6 m)
Cb = Rm
£ 3.0 (where Rm = 1.0)
= 2.22
24.168384.67492.303300.5405.2
00.5405.12
´+´+´+´
´
iii) Portion BD
Cb = 1.0
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Portion (Mu)max
(kN-m)
(Vu)max
(kN)
Lb
(m)
Cb
AC 404.32 81.56 7 1.49
CB 540.00 118.04 8 2.22
BD 540.00 90.00 6 1.00
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Greater value of Mu makes a segment more
critical.
Similarly, a longer unbraced length reduces the
member capacity.
However, smaller value of Cb is more critical for a
particular segment.
The effect of these three factors together
determines whether a selected segment is actually
more critical than the other segments.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
The decision about which part of the beam is
more critical for design depends on experience
but may not always be fully accurate.
If a wrong choice is made for this critical section,
the procedure will correct itself.
Only the calculations will be lengthy in such cases
with the end result being always the same.
For this example, assume that portion BD is more
critical and first design it. Later on, check for the
other two portions.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
dmin » = = 682 mm
22
l
22
15000
Depth for portion AB may be relaxed a little due to the
presence of cantilever portion.
However, the portion BD may have its own larger depth
requirements.
Portion BD
Assuming the section to be internally compact
with no LTB,
Assumed (Zx)req = =
= 2400 ´ 103 mm3
yb
u
F
M
f
6
10´
2509.0
10540 6
´
´
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
From beam selection tables, the trial section is:
W610 ´ 92
Lp = 1.75 m, Lr = 5.33 m, Lb = 6 m,
Lm = Lp (as Cb = 1.0)
Lb >> Lm Þ use beam selection charts
For Mu = 540 kN-m and Lb = 6m
From unbraced beam curves Þ W610 ´ 125
is the first choice but select W690´125 to
satisfy dmin.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Trial Section: W690´125
Actual d = 678 (still a little lesser but within
permissible limits)
Lp = 2.62 m ; Lr = 7.67 m ; BF = 77.0 kN ; Lm = Lp ;
Mp = 999.50 kN-m ; Mr = 610.75 kN-m
Compactness Check:
1- web is continuously connected OK
2- bf/2tf = 7.8 £ lp = 10.8 OK
3. h/tw = 52.7 £ lp = 107 OK
 Section is internally compact.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Lm < Lb £ Lr
fbMn = Cb ´ fb [Mp – BF(Lb – Lp)] £ fbMp
= 1.0 ´ 0.9 [999.50 – 77.0(6 – 2.62)]
= 665.22 kN-m £ 899.55 kN-m
Mu = 540 kN-m < fbMn OK
h/tw = 52.7 £ 63.4 Þ
fvVn = ´ 250 ´ 678 ´ 11.7 ´ 1.0
= 1070.9 kN
1000
6.09.0 ´
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Vu = 118.04 kN £ fvVn OK
Check for Portion AC
Lb = 7m ; Cb = 1.49
Lp < Lb £ Lr
fbMn = Cb ´ fb [Mp – BF(Lb – Lp)] £ fbMp
= 1.49 ´ 0.9 [999.50 – 77.0(7 – 2.62)]
= 887.92 kN-m £ 899.55 kN-m
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
 fbMn = 887.92 kN-m
Mu = 404.32 kN-m < fbMn OK
For W690´125:
Sx = 3490´103 mm3
Mp = 999.50 kN-m ; Mr = 610.75 kN-m
Check For Portion CB
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
fbMp = 899.55 kN-m
J = 117 ´104 mm4 ; ry = 52.6 mm
Lb = 8m ; Cb = 2.22
Iy = 4410 ´104 mm4 ; ry = 52.6 mm
d = 678 mm ; tf = 16.3 mm
ho = d - tf = 678 - 16.3 = 661.7 mm
tsr
x
oy
S
hI
2
3
4
1034902
7.661104410
´´
´´
=
= = 64.66 mm
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Lb > Lr
= 123.86
fbMn = fb ´ Sx / 106 £ fbMp
59.64
8000
=
ts
b
r
L
2
2
2
078.01 ÷÷
ø
ö
çç
è
æ
+
÷÷
ø
ö
çç
è
æ ts
b
ox
ts
b
b
r
L
hS
cJ
r
L
EC p
632
32
2
10/10349086.123
7.661103490
11170000
078.01
86.123
20000022.2
9.0 ´´´
´´
´
+
´´
´
p
=
fbMn = 1137.10 kN-m £ 899.55 kN-m
Hence fbMn = fbMp = 899.55 kN-m and portion BD
is most critical as expected earlier.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Mu = 540 kN-m < fbMn OK
Deflection Check:
Requires detailed calculations for Dactual that is not
asked for in this example. Very approximate
calculations are performed as under:
Dmax for cantilever »
where a is the cantilever length and l is the span
=
( )
EI
aPa
3
2
+l
( )
4
2
10000,119000,2003
000,6000,15000,6000,30
´´´
+´
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Dmax = 31.76 mm (will be reduced by loads on span ‘l’)
Also Dmax considering one end of the overhang as
fixed
»
=
EI
Pa
3
3
4
3
10000,119000,2003
000,6000,30
´´´
´
= 9.08 mm
l/360 = 6000/360 = 16.67mm
 Deflection may be critical, detailed
calculations are recommended.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Self weight = = 1.23 kN/m
(asked to be ignored in the problem statement)
1000
81.9125´
Final Selection: W690´125
Example 4.4: Select suitable trial section for a 8m long
simply supported W-section beam subjected to service
live load of 10 kN/m and imposed dead load of 4 kN/m.
The compression flange is continuously supported in the
lateral direction and the deflection is limited to
span/1500.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Solution:
Assumed self weight = 10% of superimposed
dead load
= 0.4 kN/m
say 0.8 kN/m as live load is greater and deflection
requirements are strict.
wu = 1.2D + 1.6L
= 1.2 ´ 4.8 + 1.6 ´ 10 = 21.76 kN/m
Mu = Mmax = = 174.08 kN-m
8
876.21 2
´
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Assuming the section to be internally compact and
knowing that there is no LTB,
(Zx)req = =
= 773.7 ´ 103 mm3
dmin = = 364 mm
yb
u
F
M
f
6
10´
2509.0
1008.174 6
´
´
22
8000
Dact due to service live load =
EI
w 4
384
5 ll
´
= 8,000 / 1500
( )
min
4
000,200
000,810
384
5
I´
´
´
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Imin = 50,000 ´ 104 mm4
Zsel ³ 773.7 ´ 103 mm3
Selection Minimum weight section
of section d ³ 364 mm
Imin = 50,000 ´ 104 mm4
From beam selection tables,
Trial section no.1: W360 ´ 44
d = 352 mm < dmin
Ix = 12,100 ´ 104 mm4
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Moving upwards in the same tables,
Trial section no.2: W410 ´ 46.1
d = 403 mm > dmin
Ix = 15,600 ´ 104 mm4
Trial section no.3: W360 ´ 51
d = 355 mm < dmin
Ix = 14,200 ´ 104 mm4
Trial section no.4: W460 ´ 52
Ix = 21,200 ´ 104 mm4
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
Skipping W410 ´ 60 and W460 ´ 60,
Trial section no.5: W530 ´ 66
Ix = 35,100 ´ 104 mm4
Trial section no.6: W530 ´ 74
Ix = 41,000 ´ 104 mm4
Trial section no.7: W610 ´ 82
Ix = 56,200 ´ 104 mm4
Trial Section: W610 ´ 82
After selection of the trial section, all the checks are
to be performed. This part of the exercise is left for
the reader to be completed.
Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi
End of Chapter 4

More Related Content

What's hot

Overview of Direct Analysis Method of Design for
Overview of Direct Analysis Method of Design forOverview of Direct Analysis Method of Design for
Overview of Direct Analysis Method of Design forRyan Brotherson
 
Steel strucure lec # (15)
Steel strucure lec #  (15)Steel strucure lec #  (15)
Steel strucure lec # (15)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (20)
Steel strucure lec #  (20)Steel strucure lec #  (20)
Steel strucure lec # (20)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (16)
Steel strucure lec #  (16)Steel strucure lec #  (16)
Steel strucure lec # (16)Civil Zone
 
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearrectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearqueripan
 
transmission line tower design
transmission line tower designtransmission line tower design
transmission line tower designkunalbhattgecd
 
Column Interaction Diagram construction
Column Interaction Diagram constructionColumn Interaction Diagram construction
Column Interaction Diagram constructionPritesh Parmar
 
Bridge Engineering and Extreme Events: Wind effects on bridge decks
Bridge Engineering and Extreme Events: Wind effects on bridge decks Bridge Engineering and Extreme Events: Wind effects on bridge decks
Bridge Engineering and Extreme Events: Wind effects on bridge decks Julianne Crawford
 
Elastic flexural torsional buckling
Elastic flexural torsional bucklingElastic flexural torsional buckling
Elastic flexural torsional bucklingBhavin Shah
 
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)Hossam Shafiq II
 
Yield line theory
Yield line theoryYield line theory
Yield line theoryVikas Mehta
 
how to calculate wind load on any building
how to calculate wind load on any building how to calculate wind load on any building
how to calculate wind load on any building Mahreen Zamir Abro
 
06-Strength of Double Angle Welded Tension Members (Steel Structural Design &...
06-Strength of Double Angle Welded Tension Members (Steel Structural Design &...06-Strength of Double Angle Welded Tension Members (Steel Structural Design &...
06-Strength of Double Angle Welded Tension Members (Steel Structural Design &...Hossam Shafiq II
 
Seismic Design of RC Diaphragms, Chords, and Collectors
Seismic Design of RC Diaphragms, Chords, and CollectorsSeismic Design of RC Diaphragms, Chords, and Collectors
Seismic Design of RC Diaphragms, Chords, and CollectorsRuangRangka
 
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak Nada Zarrak
 

What's hot (20)

Overview of Direct Analysis Method of Design for
Overview of Direct Analysis Method of Design forOverview of Direct Analysis Method of Design for
Overview of Direct Analysis Method of Design for
 
Steel strucure lec # (15)
Steel strucure lec #  (15)Steel strucure lec #  (15)
Steel strucure lec # (15)
 
Steel strucure lec # (20)
Steel strucure lec #  (20)Steel strucure lec #  (20)
Steel strucure lec # (20)
 
Wind_Load
Wind_LoadWind_Load
Wind_Load
 
Steel strucure lec # (16)
Steel strucure lec #  (16)Steel strucure lec #  (16)
Steel strucure lec # (16)
 
Structural engineering i
Structural engineering iStructural engineering i
Structural engineering i
 
Deep beams
Deep beamsDeep beams
Deep beams
 
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearrectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
 
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTUREDESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
 
Deep beams
Deep beams Deep beams
Deep beams
 
transmission line tower design
transmission line tower designtransmission line tower design
transmission line tower design
 
Column Interaction Diagram construction
Column Interaction Diagram constructionColumn Interaction Diagram construction
Column Interaction Diagram construction
 
Bridge Engineering and Extreme Events: Wind effects on bridge decks
Bridge Engineering and Extreme Events: Wind effects on bridge decks Bridge Engineering and Extreme Events: Wind effects on bridge decks
Bridge Engineering and Extreme Events: Wind effects on bridge decks
 
Elastic flexural torsional buckling
Elastic flexural torsional bucklingElastic flexural torsional buckling
Elastic flexural torsional buckling
 
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
 
Yield line theory
Yield line theoryYield line theory
Yield line theory
 
how to calculate wind load on any building
how to calculate wind load on any building how to calculate wind load on any building
how to calculate wind load on any building
 
06-Strength of Double Angle Welded Tension Members (Steel Structural Design &...
06-Strength of Double Angle Welded Tension Members (Steel Structural Design &...06-Strength of Double Angle Welded Tension Members (Steel Structural Design &...
06-Strength of Double Angle Welded Tension Members (Steel Structural Design &...
 
Seismic Design of RC Diaphragms, Chords, and Collectors
Seismic Design of RC Diaphragms, Chords, and CollectorsSeismic Design of RC Diaphragms, Chords, and Collectors
Seismic Design of RC Diaphragms, Chords, and Collectors
 
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak
 

Similar to Steel strucure lec # (10)

Steel strucure lec # (7)
Steel strucure lec #  (7)Steel strucure lec #  (7)
Steel strucure lec # (7)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (5)
Steel strucure lec #  (5)Steel strucure lec #  (5)
Steel strucure lec # (5)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (8)
Steel strucure lec #  (8)Steel strucure lec #  (8)
Steel strucure lec # (8)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (19)
Steel strucure lec #  (19)Steel strucure lec #  (19)
Steel strucure lec # (19)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (13)
Steel strucure lec #  (13)Steel strucure lec #  (13)
Steel strucure lec # (13)Civil Zone
 
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1Subhash Patankar
 
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDYSTRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDYALI KIFAH KADHUM
 
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDYSTRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDYIAEME Publication
 
Steel strucure lec # (11)
Steel strucure lec #  (11)Steel strucure lec #  (11)
Steel strucure lec # (11)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (4)
Steel strucure lec #  (4)Steel strucure lec #  (4)
Steel strucure lec # (4)Civil Zone
 
Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)
Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)
Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)Jahidur Rahman
 
Lecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptx
Lecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptxLecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptx
Lecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptxAbelMulugeta8
 
Design of rectangular beam by USD
Design of rectangular beam by USDDesign of rectangular beam by USD
Design of rectangular beam by USDSadia Mahjabeen
 
Steel strucure lec # (12)
Steel strucure lec #  (12)Steel strucure lec #  (12)
Steel strucure lec # (12)Civil Zone
 
Chapter 5 beams design
Chapter 5  beams designChapter 5  beams design
Chapter 5 beams designSimon Foo
 
Defense_Thesis_Ramy_Gabr_06-22-2014_Final-with notes - Copy
Defense_Thesis_Ramy_Gabr_06-22-2014_Final-with notes - CopyDefense_Thesis_Ramy_Gabr_06-22-2014_Final-with notes - Copy
Defense_Thesis_Ramy_Gabr_06-22-2014_Final-with notes - CopyRamy Gabr, M.Sc, P.E.
 
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Vikas Mehta
 

Similar to Steel strucure lec # (10) (20)

Steel strucure lec # (7)
Steel strucure lec #  (7)Steel strucure lec #  (7)
Steel strucure lec # (7)
 
Steel strucure lec # (5)
Steel strucure lec #  (5)Steel strucure lec #  (5)
Steel strucure lec # (5)
 
Steel strucure lec # (8)
Steel strucure lec #  (8)Steel strucure lec #  (8)
Steel strucure lec # (8)
 
Selecting Columns And Beams
Selecting Columns And BeamsSelecting Columns And Beams
Selecting Columns And Beams
 
Steel strucure lec # (19)
Steel strucure lec #  (19)Steel strucure lec #  (19)
Steel strucure lec # (19)
 
Steel strucure lec # (13)
Steel strucure lec #  (13)Steel strucure lec #  (13)
Steel strucure lec # (13)
 
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
 
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDYSTRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
 
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDYSTRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS – A PARAMETRIC STUDY
 
Steel strucure lec # (11)
Steel strucure lec #  (11)Steel strucure lec #  (11)
Steel strucure lec # (11)
 
Steel strucure lec # (4)
Steel strucure lec #  (4)Steel strucure lec #  (4)
Steel strucure lec # (4)
 
Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)
Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)
Design Procedure of Singly,Doubly & T-Beam(As Per ACI code)
 
Lecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptx
Lecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptxLecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptx
Lecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptx
 
Design of rectangular beam by USD
Design of rectangular beam by USDDesign of rectangular beam by USD
Design of rectangular beam by USD
 
Steel strucure lec # (12)
Steel strucure lec #  (12)Steel strucure lec #  (12)
Steel strucure lec # (12)
 
Chapter 5 beams design
Chapter 5  beams designChapter 5  beams design
Chapter 5 beams design
 
Defense_Thesis_Ramy_Gabr_06-22-2014_Final-with notes - Copy
Defense_Thesis_Ramy_Gabr_06-22-2014_Final-with notes - CopyDefense_Thesis_Ramy_Gabr_06-22-2014_Final-with notes - Copy
Defense_Thesis_Ramy_Gabr_06-22-2014_Final-with notes - Copy
 
presentation1_28.pptx
presentation1_28.pptxpresentation1_28.pptx
presentation1_28.pptx
 
structure problems
structure problemsstructure problems
structure problems
 
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
 

More from Civil Zone

Vertical alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
Vertical alignment of highway (transportation engineering)Vertical alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
Vertical alignment of highway (transportation engineering)Civil Zone
 
Traffic studies (transportation engineering)
Traffic studies (transportation engineering)Traffic studies (transportation engineering)
Traffic studies (transportation engineering)Civil Zone
 
Level of service (los) multilane hwys 02 (transportation engineering)
Level of service (los) multilane hwys 02 (transportation engineering)Level of service (los) multilane hwys 02 (transportation engineering)
Level of service (los) multilane hwys 02 (transportation engineering)Civil Zone
 
Introduction to transportation engineering
Introduction to transportation engineeringIntroduction to transportation engineering
Introduction to transportation engineeringCivil Zone
 
Highway materials (transportation engineering)
Highway materials (transportation engineering)Highway materials (transportation engineering)
Highway materials (transportation engineering)Civil Zone
 
Capacity & level of service (transportation engineering)
Capacity & level of service (transportation engineering)Capacity & level of service (transportation engineering)
Capacity & level of service (transportation engineering)Civil Zone
 
Alighnment & horizontal alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
Alighnment & horizontal alignment of highway (transportation engineering)Alighnment & horizontal alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
Alighnment & horizontal alignment of highway (transportation engineering)Civil Zone
 
Introduction to Hydraulics engineering
 Introduction to Hydraulics engineering Introduction to Hydraulics engineering
Introduction to Hydraulics engineeringCivil Zone
 
Hydropower engineering -Hydraulics
Hydropower engineering -HydraulicsHydropower engineering -Hydraulics
Hydropower engineering -HydraulicsCivil Zone
 
Dams and Reservoirs -Hydraulics engineering
Dams and Reservoirs -Hydraulics engineeringDams and Reservoirs -Hydraulics engineering
Dams and Reservoirs -Hydraulics engineeringCivil Zone
 
Similitude and Dimensional Analysis -Hydraulics engineering
Similitude and Dimensional Analysis -Hydraulics engineering Similitude and Dimensional Analysis -Hydraulics engineering
Similitude and Dimensional Analysis -Hydraulics engineering Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (21)
Steel strucure lec #  (21)Steel strucure lec #  (21)
Steel strucure lec # (21)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (14)
Steel strucure lec #  (14)Steel strucure lec #  (14)
Steel strucure lec # (14)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (6)
Steel strucure lec #  (6)Steel strucure lec #  (6)
Steel strucure lec # (6)Civil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (5) copy
Steel strucure lec #  (5)   copySteel strucure lec #  (5)   copy
Steel strucure lec # (5) copyCivil Zone
 
Steel strucure lec # (4) copy
Steel strucure lec #  (4)  copySteel strucure lec #  (4)  copy
Steel strucure lec # (4) copyCivil Zone
 

More from Civil Zone (16)

Vertical alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
Vertical alignment of highway (transportation engineering)Vertical alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
Vertical alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
 
Traffic studies (transportation engineering)
Traffic studies (transportation engineering)Traffic studies (transportation engineering)
Traffic studies (transportation engineering)
 
Level of service (los) multilane hwys 02 (transportation engineering)
Level of service (los) multilane hwys 02 (transportation engineering)Level of service (los) multilane hwys 02 (transportation engineering)
Level of service (los) multilane hwys 02 (transportation engineering)
 
Introduction to transportation engineering
Introduction to transportation engineeringIntroduction to transportation engineering
Introduction to transportation engineering
 
Highway materials (transportation engineering)
Highway materials (transportation engineering)Highway materials (transportation engineering)
Highway materials (transportation engineering)
 
Capacity & level of service (transportation engineering)
Capacity & level of service (transportation engineering)Capacity & level of service (transportation engineering)
Capacity & level of service (transportation engineering)
 
Alighnment & horizontal alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
Alighnment & horizontal alignment of highway (transportation engineering)Alighnment & horizontal alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
Alighnment & horizontal alignment of highway (transportation engineering)
 
Introduction to Hydraulics engineering
 Introduction to Hydraulics engineering Introduction to Hydraulics engineering
Introduction to Hydraulics engineering
 
Hydropower engineering -Hydraulics
Hydropower engineering -HydraulicsHydropower engineering -Hydraulics
Hydropower engineering -Hydraulics
 
Dams and Reservoirs -Hydraulics engineering
Dams and Reservoirs -Hydraulics engineeringDams and Reservoirs -Hydraulics engineering
Dams and Reservoirs -Hydraulics engineering
 
Similitude and Dimensional Analysis -Hydraulics engineering
Similitude and Dimensional Analysis -Hydraulics engineering Similitude and Dimensional Analysis -Hydraulics engineering
Similitude and Dimensional Analysis -Hydraulics engineering
 
Steel strucure lec # (21)
Steel strucure lec #  (21)Steel strucure lec #  (21)
Steel strucure lec # (21)
 
Steel strucure lec # (14)
Steel strucure lec #  (14)Steel strucure lec #  (14)
Steel strucure lec # (14)
 
Steel strucure lec # (6)
Steel strucure lec #  (6)Steel strucure lec #  (6)
Steel strucure lec # (6)
 
Steel strucure lec # (5) copy
Steel strucure lec #  (5)   copySteel strucure lec #  (5)   copy
Steel strucure lec # (5) copy
 
Steel strucure lec # (4) copy
Steel strucure lec #  (4)  copySteel strucure lec #  (4)  copy
Steel strucure lec # (4) copy
 

Recently uploaded

Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024hassan khalil
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...Soham Mondal
 
SPICE PARK APR2024 ( 6,793 SPICE Models )
SPICE PARK APR2024 ( 6,793 SPICE Models )SPICE PARK APR2024 ( 6,793 SPICE Models )
SPICE PARK APR2024 ( 6,793 SPICE Models )Tsuyoshi Horigome
 
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxBiology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxDeepakSakkari2
 
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escortsranjana rawat
 
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escortsranjana rawat
 
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...ranjana rawat
 
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube ExchangerStudy on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube ExchangerAnamika Sarkar
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidNikhilNagaraju
 
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICSAPPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICSKurinjimalarL3
 
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2RajaP95
 
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024Mark Billinghurst
 
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptxMicroscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptxpurnimasatapathy1234
 
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile servicerehmti665
 
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIPast, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIabhishek36461
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
 
SPICE PARK APR2024 ( 6,793 SPICE Models )
SPICE PARK APR2024 ( 6,793 SPICE Models )SPICE PARK APR2024 ( 6,793 SPICE Models )
SPICE PARK APR2024 ( 6,793 SPICE Models )
 
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
 
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
 
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptxExploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
 
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxBiology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
 
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
 
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
 
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
 
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube ExchangerStudy on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
 
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICSAPPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
 
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
 
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
 
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptxMicroscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
 
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
 
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIPast, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
 

Steel strucure lec # (10)

  • 1. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi In case of buildings, the maximum service live load deflection is usually limited to L /360. This limit is considered invisible not damaging the surface finishes. The deflections may be limited to L/1500 or L /2000 for structures supporting delicate machinery. In case of bridge, deflections due to live and impact loads are restricted to L /800.
  • 2. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi During initial proportioning of steel beams, it is customary to indirectly control deflections by limiting the span-over-depth ratio (L /d ratio) for the members. When these conditions are satisfied it is more likely that the deflection check, to be performed later on, will be satisfied eliminating the need for greater number of trials to get a reasonable section. Typical span-over-depth ratios used for various types of members are as under:
  • 3. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi 1- For buildings, L/d ratio is usually limited to a maximum of 5500 / Fy. L /d £ 5500 / Fy dmin = Fy L /5500 (L /22 for A36 steel) 2- For bridge components and other beams subjected to impact or vibratory loads, L /d £ 20 3- For roof purlins, L /d £ 6900 / Fy (27.5 for A36 steel, sometimes relaxed to a value equal to 30)
  • 4. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi The actual expected deflections may be calculated using the mechanics principles. However, results given in Manuals and Handbooks may also be used directly. Some of the typical deflection formulas are reproduced here. 1- For uniformly loaded and simply supported beams, Dmax = EI w 384 5 4 ll
  • 5. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi 2- For uniformly loaded continuous beams, Dmidspan = [Mc – 0.1(Ma + Mb)] Where Mc = magnitude of central moment, Ma, Mb = magnitude of end moments. EI48 5 2 l 3- For simply supported beams subjected to point load (refer to Figure 4.16), Dmidspan = where a £ L/ 2( )22 4 3 12 a EI aP -l
  • 6. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi a b P 4- For overhanging part of beam subjected to UDL, a No Load w per meter l Dmax @ ( )a EI aw 34 24 3 +l
  • 7. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi 5. For the above case, with UDL also present within supports, Dmax @ ( )332 34 24 aa EI aw +-ll 6- For overhanging part of beam subjected to point load, P No load al Dmax = ( ) EI aaP 3 2 +l
  • 8. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS Write Known Data Estimate self-weight of the member. a. The self-weight may be taken as 10 percent of the applied dead UDL or dead point load distributed over all the length. b. If only live load is applied, self-weight may be taken equal to 5 percent of its magnitude. c. In case only factored loads are given, self- wt. may be taken equal to 3 % of the given loads.
  • 9. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Calculate Factored Loads Draw B.M. and S.F. Diagrams Calculate Cb For Each Unbraced Segment Find Mu,max, Vu,max, Lb for each segment and guess which segment is the most critical. Design this segment first and then check for others.
  • 10. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Assume the section to be compact without LTB in the start and calculate Zx accordingly. Assumed Zx,req = fb = 0.9 ; Fy = 250 MPa for A36 steel yb u F M f 6 10´ Zsel ³ Zreq Selection of Section Minimum weight d ³ dmin dmin = For Dmax = L/360 5500 lyF = L /22 for A36 steel and simply supported beams
  • 11. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi For Dmax required to be lesser than L /360, like L /500 or L /800, find (Ix)req from the deflection formula, with only the live load acting, and select section such that Ix ³ (Ix)req. Method 1 Use Of Selection Tables 1. Enter the column headed Zx and find a value equal to or just greater than the plastic section modulus required. 2. The beam corresponding to this value in the shape column and all beams above it have sufficient flexural strength based on these parameters.
  • 12. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi 3. The first beam appearing in boldface type (top of a group) adjacent to or above the required Zx is the lightest suitable section. 4. If the beam must have to satisfy a certain depth or minimum moment of inertia criterion, proceed up the column headed “Shape” until a beam fulfilling the requirements is reached. 5. If Cb > 1.0, use Lm in place of Lp for the approximate selection. 6. If Lb is larger than Lm of the selected section, use the unbraced design charts.
  • 13. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi 7. Apply moment capacity, shear capacity, deflection and all other checks. 8. The column headed fbMp may also be used in place of the Zx column in the above method. Method 2: Use Of Unbraced Design Charts This method is applicable in cases where the above method is not fully applicable and Lb ³ Lp. The design charts are basically developed for uniform moment case with Cb = 1.0.
  • 14. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Following notation is used to separate full plastic, inelastic LTB, and elastic LTB ranges: Solid Circle represents Lp Hollow Circle represents Lr 1. According to Mu in kN-m units and Lb in meters, enter into the charts. 2. Any section represented by a curve to the right and above ( ) the point selected in No. 1 will have a greater allowed unbraced length and a greater moment capacity than the required values of the two parameters.
  • 15. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi 3. A dashed line section is not an economical solution. If dashed section is encountered while moving in top-right direction, proceed further upwards and to the right till the first solid line section is obtained. Select the corresponding section as the trial section, and it will be the lightest available section for the requirements. 4. If Cb > 1.0, use Mu,req = Mu / Cb but check that the selected section has fbMp > Mu.
  • 16. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Check the three conditions of compact section for internal stability, namely, 1. web continuously connected with flange, 2. flange stability criterion, and 3. web stability criterion. If any one out of the above three is not satisfied, revise the section. Either calculate Lp, Lr, and Lm or find their values from beam selection tables.
  • 17. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Lp = (mm) = 0.05 ry (m) for A36 steel yfy FEr76.1 Lr = 2 7.0 76.611 7.0 95.1 ÷÷ ø ö çç è æ ++ cJ hS E F hS cJ F E r oxy oxy ts Mr = 0.7Fy Sx/106 kN-m = = for doubly symmetric I-sections 2 tsr x wy S CI x oy S hI 2 c = 1.0 for a doubly symmetric I-shape ho = d – tf
  • 18. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi BF = pr rp LL MM - - Lm = Lp + £ Lr÷÷ ø ö çç è æ - b bp C C BF M 1 Calculate design flexural strength: 1- If Lb £ Lm Mn = Mp = Zx Fy / 106 (kN – m) 2- If Lm < Lb £ Lr Mn = Cb [Mp – BF(Lb – Lp)] £ Mp (kN – m) 3- If Lb > Lr Mn = CbFcrSx £ Mp
  • 19. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi where Fcr = 2 2 2 078.01 ÷÷ ø ö çç è æ + ÷÷ ø ö çç è æ ts b ox ts b b r L hS cJ r L EC p Bending strength check: Mu £ fbMn OK If not satisfied revise the trial selection. Shear check:
  • 20. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi For £ 2.24 (= 63.4 for A36 steel) Cv = 1.0 wt h ywFE / fv Vn = Fyw Aw Cv (kN) 1000 6.09.0 ´ If not satisfied, revise the section. Deflection check: Find Dact due to service live loads. Dact £ L/360 or other specified limit OK
  • 21. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Check self-weight: Calculated self weight £ 1.2 ´ assumed self weight OK Otherwise, revise the loads and repeat the calculations. Write final selection using standard designation.
  • 22. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Example 4.1: BEAMS WITH CONTINUOUS LATERAL SUPPORT Design a 7m long simply supported I-section beam subjected to service live load of 5 kN/m and imposed dead load of 6 kN/m, as shown in Figure 4.18. The compression flange is continuously supported. Use (a) A36 steel and (b) steel with fy = 345 MPa and permissible live load deflection of span / 450.
  • 23. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Solution: In beams with continuous lateral support, unbraced length is not applicable or it may be assumed equal to zero in calculations. Assumed self weight = 10% of superimposed DL = 0.6 kN/m wu = 1.2D + 1.6L = 1.2 ´ 6.6 + 1.6 ´ 5 = 15.92 kN/m
  • 24. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi 97.51 kN-m B.M.D. 15.92 kN/m 55.72 kN55.72 kN 7 m 55.72 kN 55.72 kN S.F.D.
  • 25. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi If the beam is continuously braced, Cb value is not applicable but may be considered equal to 1.0 in case it is required in the formulas. Mu = Mmax = 97.51 kN-m Vu = Vmax = 55.72 kN Compression flange continuously braced. (a) A36 Steel Assuming the section to be internally compact and knowing that there is no LTB,
  • 26. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi (Zx)req = = = 433.4 ´ 103 mm3 yb u F M f 6 10´ 2509.0 1051.97 6 ´ ´ dmin = = 318 mm 22 7000 Zsel ³ Zreq Selection of section Min. weight section d ³ dmin Consulting beam selection tables (Reference-1), following result is obtained: W310 ´ 32.7 provides sufficient strength but depth is little lesser.
  • 27. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Select W360 ´ 32.9; Zx = 544 ´ 103 mm3 Check internal compactness of section as under: 1. web is continuously connected OK 2. = 7.5 < lp = 10.8 OK 3. = 53.3< lp =107 OK f f t2 b wt h The section is internally compact. Continuously braced conditions imply: Lb < Lp and Cb = not included in formulas
  • 28. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi fbMn = fbMp = 0.9 ´ 544 ´ 103 ´ 250 / 106 @ 121 kN-m Mu = 97.51 kN-m < fbMp OK h/tw =53.3 < 63.4 Þ shear yield formula is applicable fvVn = FywAwCv = ´ 250 ´ 349 ´ 5.8 ´ 1.0 = 273.27 kN 1000 6.09.0 ´ 1000 6.09.0 ´
  • 29. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Vu = 55.72 (kN) < fvVn OK Dact due to service live load = = = 9.44 mm EI w 4 384 5 ll ´ ( ) 4 4 108280200000 70005 384 5 ´´ ´ ´ Dall = L/360 = 7000 / 360 = 19.44 mm Dact < Dall OK Self-weight = = 0.32 kN/m 1000 81.99.32 ´
  • 30. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi This is lesser than assumed self-weight of 0.6 kN/m in the start. OK Final Selection: W360 ´ 32.9 (b) Steel With Fy = 345 MPa Assuming the section to be internally compact and knowing that there is no LTB, (Zx)req = = = 314.0 ´ 103 mm3 yb u F M f 6 10´ 3459.0 1051.97 6 ´ ´ dmin = = 438 mm 16 7000
  • 31. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi This dmin is much larger, so the direct deflection criteria will be used. EI wL 4 384 5 450 ll = = = 5024 ´ 104 mm4 E w I L req 3 384 4505 l´ = 200000 70005 384 4505 3 ´´ Zsel ³ Zreq Selection of section Min. weight section I ³ Imin
  • 32. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Consulting beam selection tables (Reference-1), following result is obtained: W310 ´ 28.3 provides sufficient strength and moment of inertia. Ix = 5410 ´ 104 mm4 ; Zx = 405 ´ 103 mm3 Check internal compactness of section as under: 1. web is continuously connected OK 2. bf / 2tf = 5.7 < lp = 9.1 OK 3. h / tw= 46.2 < lp =90.5 OK The section is internally compact.
  • 33. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Continuously braced conditions imply: Lb < Lp and Cb = N.A. fbMn = fbMp = 0.9 ´ 405 ´ 103 ´ 345 / 106 @ 125.8 kN-m Mu = 97.51 kN-m < fbMp OK h/tw =53.3 < = 53.9 Þ shear yield formula is applicable yFE /24.2
  • 34. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi fvVn = FywAwCv = ´ 345 ´ 309 ´ 6.0 ´ 1.0 = 345.40 kN 1000 6.09.0 ´ 1000 6.09.0 ´ Vu = 55.72 (kN) < fvVn OK Dact < Dall Already satisfied OK Self-weight = = 0.28 kN/m 1000 81.93.28 ´
  • 35. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi This is lesser than assumed self-weight of 0.6 kN/m in the start. OK Final Selection: W310 ´ 28.3 Example 4.2: BEAMS WITH COMPRESSION FLANGE LATERALY SUPPORTED (BRACED) AT REACTION POINTS ONLY Design the beam of Figure 4.19 with the lateral bracing only provided at the reaction points.
  • 36. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi wD = 8 kN/m wL = 10 kN/m 3.5m3.5m PD = 60 kN PL = 50 kN
  • 37. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Solution: Self load = 0.1 = 1.7 kN/m ÷ ø ö ç è æ + 7 60 8 wu = 1.2 ´ 9.7 + 1.6 ´ 10 = 27.64 kN/m Pu = 1.2 ´ 60 + 1.6 ´ 50 = 152 kN The factored loading and the shear force and bending moment diagrams are shown in Figure 4.20.
  • 38. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi 172.74 kN 172.74 kN S.F.D. 76 76 B.M.D. 169.30 kN-m 266.00 kN-m wu = 27.64 kN/m 172.74 kN172.74 kN 3.5m3.5m Pu = 152 kN
  • 39. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Calculation of Cb: MB = Mmax = 435.3 kN-m MA = MC = 172.4 ´ 1.75 – 27.64 ´ 1.752/2 = 259.97 kN-m Cb = Rm = 1.24 £ 3.0 (where Rm = 1.0) 97.259630.4355.6 30.4355.12 ´+´ ´ Mmax = 435.3 kN-m : Vmax = 172.74 kN : Lb = 7 m
  • 40. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Assuming the section to be internally compact with no LTB, (Zx)req = = = 1935 ´ 103 mm3 dmin. = L/22 = 7000/22 = 318 mm yb u F M f 6 10´ 2509.0 103.435 6 ´ ´ Zsel ³ Zreq Selection of section Min. weight section d ³ dmin Using beam selection tables of Reference-1,
  • 41. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Trial section: W610 ´ 82 Mp = 549.00 kN-m, Mr = 327.25 kN-m, BF = 64.99, Lr = 5.10 m Lp = 1.67 m : Lm = 1.67 + = 3.33 m÷ ø ö ç è æ - 24.1 124.1 99.64 00.549 Lb >> Lm Þ revise the section using beam selection charts of Reference-1 For Lb = 7m and Mu,eq = 435.3 / 1.24 = 351.05 kN- m, from design charts of Reference-1,
  • 42. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Select W410 ´ 100 fbMp = 479.25 kN-m > Mu OK d > dmin OK Check internal compactness of section: 1- web is continuously connected OK 2- = 7.7< lp = 10.8 OK 3- = 35.9 < lp = 107 OK The section is internally compact. f f t b 2 wt h
  • 43. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Lp = 3.11 m Lr = 10.00 m BF = 28.53 kN Mp = 532.50 kN-m Lm = Lp + £ Lr Lm = 3.11 + = 6.72 m ÷÷ ø ö çç è æ - b bp C C BF M 1 ÷ ø ö ç è æ - 24.1 124.1 53.28 50.532 Lm < Lb £ Lr: fbMn = Cb ´ fb [Mp – BF(Lb - Lp)] £ fbMp = 1.24 ´ 0.9 [532.50 – 28.53(7.00 - 3.11)] = 470.44 kN-m
  • 44. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Mu = 435.3 kN-m £ fbMn OK h/tw = 35.9 < 63.4 Þ fvVn = Fyw Aw Cv = ´ 250 ´ 415 ´ 10.0 ´ 1.0 = 560.25 kN 1000 6.09.0 ´ 1000 6.09.0 ´ Vu = 172.74 kN < fvVn OK
  • 45. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Dact = ( ) ( ) ( )( )22 44 4 3500700075.0 103970020000012 350050000 1039700200000 700010 384 5 -´ ´´´ ´ + ´´ ´ ´ = 3.94 + 4.50 = 8.44 mm L/360 = 19.44 mm Dact < L/360 OK Self weight = = 0.981 kN/m < 1.7 kN/m assumed in the start OK 1000 81.9100´ Final Selection: W410 ´ 100
  • 46. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Example 4.3: BEAMS WITH COMPRESSION FLANGE LATERALLY SUPPORTED AT INTERVALS Design the beam of Figure 4.21, ignoring self-weight and deflection check. Compression flange is laterally supported at points A, B and C. Solution: The factored loading and the shear force and bending moment diagrams are shown in Figure 4.21.
  • 47. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi 7m 8m 6m A C B D PD =35 kN PL =30 kN PD =60 kN PL =50 kN wD =3 kN/m wL =2 kN/m
  • 48. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Pu =90 kNPu =152 kN wu =6.8 kN/m 208.04 kN81.56 kN 9090 118.04118.04 33.96 81.56 S.F.D. (-) (+) 540.00 kN-m 404.32 kN-m B.M.D.
  • 49. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Mu = Mmax = 540 kN-m Mu = 404.32 kN-m for portion AC Mu = 540.00 kN-m for portions CB and BD Vu = Vmax = 118.04 kN Lb for portion AC = 7 m Lb for portion CB = 8 m Lb for portion BD = 6 m Calculation of Cb: i) Portion AC
  • 50. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi M = 81.56 x – 6.8 x2/2 Mmax = 404.32 kN-m MA = 132.32 kN-m (x = 1.75 m) MB = 243.81 kN-m (x = 3.50 m) MC = 334.48 kN-m (x = 5.25 m) Cb = Rm £ 3.0 (where Rm = 1.0) = 1.49 48.334381.243432.132332.4045.2 32.4045.12 ´+´+´+´ ´ ii) Portion CB M = 540 – 118.04 x (x starts from the end B)
  • 51. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Mmax = 540.00 kN-m MA = 303.92 kN-m (x = 2 m) MB = 67.84 kN-m (x = 4 m) MC = 168.24 kN-m (x = 6 m) Cb = Rm £ 3.0 (where Rm = 1.0) = 2.22 24.168384.67492.303300.5405.2 00.5405.12 ´+´+´+´ ´ iii) Portion BD Cb = 1.0
  • 52. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Portion (Mu)max (kN-m) (Vu)max (kN) Lb (m) Cb AC 404.32 81.56 7 1.49 CB 540.00 118.04 8 2.22 BD 540.00 90.00 6 1.00
  • 53. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Greater value of Mu makes a segment more critical. Similarly, a longer unbraced length reduces the member capacity. However, smaller value of Cb is more critical for a particular segment. The effect of these three factors together determines whether a selected segment is actually more critical than the other segments.
  • 54. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi The decision about which part of the beam is more critical for design depends on experience but may not always be fully accurate. If a wrong choice is made for this critical section, the procedure will correct itself. Only the calculations will be lengthy in such cases with the end result being always the same. For this example, assume that portion BD is more critical and first design it. Later on, check for the other two portions.
  • 55. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi dmin » = = 682 mm 22 l 22 15000 Depth for portion AB may be relaxed a little due to the presence of cantilever portion. However, the portion BD may have its own larger depth requirements. Portion BD Assuming the section to be internally compact with no LTB, Assumed (Zx)req = = = 2400 ´ 103 mm3 yb u F M f 6 10´ 2509.0 10540 6 ´ ´
  • 56. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi From beam selection tables, the trial section is: W610 ´ 92 Lp = 1.75 m, Lr = 5.33 m, Lb = 6 m, Lm = Lp (as Cb = 1.0) Lb >> Lm Þ use beam selection charts For Mu = 540 kN-m and Lb = 6m From unbraced beam curves Þ W610 ´ 125 is the first choice but select W690´125 to satisfy dmin.
  • 57. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Trial Section: W690´125 Actual d = 678 (still a little lesser but within permissible limits) Lp = 2.62 m ; Lr = 7.67 m ; BF = 77.0 kN ; Lm = Lp ; Mp = 999.50 kN-m ; Mr = 610.75 kN-m Compactness Check: 1- web is continuously connected OK 2- bf/2tf = 7.8 £ lp = 10.8 OK 3. h/tw = 52.7 £ lp = 107 OK Section is internally compact.
  • 58. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Lm < Lb £ Lr fbMn = Cb ´ fb [Mp – BF(Lb – Lp)] £ fbMp = 1.0 ´ 0.9 [999.50 – 77.0(6 – 2.62)] = 665.22 kN-m £ 899.55 kN-m Mu = 540 kN-m < fbMn OK h/tw = 52.7 £ 63.4 Þ fvVn = ´ 250 ´ 678 ´ 11.7 ´ 1.0 = 1070.9 kN 1000 6.09.0 ´
  • 59. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Vu = 118.04 kN £ fvVn OK Check for Portion AC Lb = 7m ; Cb = 1.49 Lp < Lb £ Lr fbMn = Cb ´ fb [Mp – BF(Lb – Lp)] £ fbMp = 1.49 ´ 0.9 [999.50 – 77.0(7 – 2.62)] = 887.92 kN-m £ 899.55 kN-m
  • 60. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi fbMn = 887.92 kN-m Mu = 404.32 kN-m < fbMn OK For W690´125: Sx = 3490´103 mm3 Mp = 999.50 kN-m ; Mr = 610.75 kN-m Check For Portion CB
  • 61. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi fbMp = 899.55 kN-m J = 117 ´104 mm4 ; ry = 52.6 mm Lb = 8m ; Cb = 2.22 Iy = 4410 ´104 mm4 ; ry = 52.6 mm d = 678 mm ; tf = 16.3 mm ho = d - tf = 678 - 16.3 = 661.7 mm tsr x oy S hI 2 3 4 1034902 7.661104410 ´´ ´´ = = = 64.66 mm
  • 62. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Lb > Lr = 123.86 fbMn = fb ´ Sx / 106 £ fbMp 59.64 8000 = ts b r L 2 2 2 078.01 ÷÷ ø ö çç è æ + ÷÷ ø ö çç è æ ts b ox ts b b r L hS cJ r L EC p 632 32 2 10/10349086.123 7.661103490 11170000 078.01 86.123 20000022.2 9.0 ´´´ ´´ ´ + ´´ ´ p = fbMn = 1137.10 kN-m £ 899.55 kN-m Hence fbMn = fbMp = 899.55 kN-m and portion BD is most critical as expected earlier.
  • 63. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Mu = 540 kN-m < fbMn OK Deflection Check: Requires detailed calculations for Dactual that is not asked for in this example. Very approximate calculations are performed as under: Dmax for cantilever » where a is the cantilever length and l is the span = ( ) EI aPa 3 2 +l ( ) 4 2 10000,119000,2003 000,6000,15000,6000,30 ´´´ +´
  • 64. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Dmax = 31.76 mm (will be reduced by loads on span ‘l’) Also Dmax considering one end of the overhang as fixed » = EI Pa 3 3 4 3 10000,119000,2003 000,6000,30 ´´´ ´ = 9.08 mm l/360 = 6000/360 = 16.67mm Deflection may be critical, detailed calculations are recommended.
  • 65. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Self weight = = 1.23 kN/m (asked to be ignored in the problem statement) 1000 81.9125´ Final Selection: W690´125 Example 4.4: Select suitable trial section for a 8m long simply supported W-section beam subjected to service live load of 10 kN/m and imposed dead load of 4 kN/m. The compression flange is continuously supported in the lateral direction and the deflection is limited to span/1500.
  • 66. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Solution: Assumed self weight = 10% of superimposed dead load = 0.4 kN/m say 0.8 kN/m as live load is greater and deflection requirements are strict. wu = 1.2D + 1.6L = 1.2 ´ 4.8 + 1.6 ´ 10 = 21.76 kN/m Mu = Mmax = = 174.08 kN-m 8 876.21 2 ´
  • 67. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Assuming the section to be internally compact and knowing that there is no LTB, (Zx)req = = = 773.7 ´ 103 mm3 dmin = = 364 mm yb u F M f 6 10´ 2509.0 1008.174 6 ´ ´ 22 8000 Dact due to service live load = EI w 4 384 5 ll ´ = 8,000 / 1500 ( ) min 4 000,200 000,810 384 5 I´ ´ ´
  • 68. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Imin = 50,000 ´ 104 mm4 Zsel ³ 773.7 ´ 103 mm3 Selection Minimum weight section of section d ³ 364 mm Imin = 50,000 ´ 104 mm4 From beam selection tables, Trial section no.1: W360 ´ 44 d = 352 mm < dmin Ix = 12,100 ´ 104 mm4
  • 69. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Moving upwards in the same tables, Trial section no.2: W410 ´ 46.1 d = 403 mm > dmin Ix = 15,600 ´ 104 mm4 Trial section no.3: W360 ´ 51 d = 355 mm < dmin Ix = 14,200 ´ 104 mm4 Trial section no.4: W460 ´ 52 Ix = 21,200 ´ 104 mm4
  • 70. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi Skipping W410 ´ 60 and W460 ´ 60, Trial section no.5: W530 ´ 66 Ix = 35,100 ´ 104 mm4 Trial section no.6: W530 ´ 74 Ix = 41,000 ´ 104 mm4 Trial section no.7: W610 ´ 82 Ix = 56,200 ´ 104 mm4 Trial Section: W610 ´ 82 After selection of the trial section, all the checks are to be performed. This part of the exercise is left for the reader to be completed.
  • 71. Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi End of Chapter 4