Lecture on hepatocellular carcinoma for medical students. Encompasses basic sciences, pathophysiology, classification, principles and tips on management.
3. Introduction
• Primary malignancy of liver
• Highest incidence in Asia and Africa
– Hepatitis infection
• Incidence in developing nations is >2x
developed countries
• Increases with age
• Predominantly in patients with underlying
chronic liver disease and cirrhosis
4. Etiology
• Modifiable
– Hepatitis C & B
– Alcoholism
– NASH
– Aflatoxin
• Non-modifiable
– Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency
– Haemachromatosis
Epidemic of HCC predicted with emergence of NASH, aging population & more survivors of
cirrhosis
7. • Multiphase liver CT scan
– Accurate diagnosis, staging & surgical planning
– Plain, early & late arterial, portal venous &
delayed phases
– Hypervascular pattern with arterial enhancement
and rapid washout during portal venous phase
– Tumor capsule, internal mosaic from variable
attenuation within the tumor and PV
thrombosis/invasion
8.
9. • Hepatic MRI
– Hepato-specific paramagnetic gadolinium-based
contrast (Primovisttm)
– Arterial, portal venous, late dynamic &
hepatobiliary phases
– HCC appears darker than background liver on T1-
weighted images
– Superior sensitivity & specificity vs. CT for lesions
<1cm3
10. • Biopsy
– Controversial
– Depending on lesion size & institutional practice
<1cm <50% malignant, high false-negative. For
conservative management with close
follow-up and no biopsy
1 – 2cm Imaging usually inconclusive, need to biopsy
or MRI with gadoxetate contrast
>2cm Usually can be diagnosed without biopsy.
Risk of tumour seeding must be taken into
account
13. Surgery
• Irresectable
– Child-Pugh score C
– Distant metastases
– Extrahepatic disease present – e.g. extensive
lymphadenopathy or peritoneal deposits
– Extensive bilobar disease
– Hilar tumour involving major blood vessels not
amenable to repair
– Inadequate functional liver residue predicted post-
operatively (FLR < 40% if cirrhotic, <30% if non-
cirrhotic, ICG15 >14%)
14. • Resections
– Non-anatomic (wedge)
• Limited resections of a small portion of liver without adhering to
segmental biliary ducts & vascular supply
– Anatomic
• Removing 1 or more of the 8 segments of the liver
• To improve resectability
– Contralateral portal vein embolization (for parenchymal
hypertrophy) ± TACE (minimise resected parenchymal mass)
– To increase FLR
• Liver transplantation
– Significant cirrhosis and limited tumour burden
– Milan criteria (determines candidacy for transplantation)
15. Ablative therapy
• Best for tumours <3cm
• Indications
– Bridge to transplant by reducing the risk of tumor progression
– Palliative procedure to extend DFS
• Percutaneous, laparoscopic or open surgery
• Options
– Thermal
• Radiofrequency ablation
• Microwave ablation
• High intensity focused ultrasonography (HIFU)
• Cryoablation
– Chemical
• Ethanol – obsolete
– Electrical
• Irreversible electroporation aka nanoknife
– DC pulses across 2 electrodes causing actively dividing cells’ membrane to rupture
16. Regional liver therapy
• Generally considered non-curative
• Options
– Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
– Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT)
18. Systemic therapy
• Multikinase inhibitors
• Indications
– Child’s A
– Metastatic disease
– Irresectable but failed/unsuitable for regional
therapy
• Sorafenib, sunitinib
19. Screening
• All cirrhotic patients
• 6 monthly USG & AFP*
– No extra benefit with 3 monthly screen
• Reason
– Increased detection of early HCC
– Increased detection of single HCC <5cm
– Increased surgery for HCC
– Increased survival
– Increased cost effectiveness
20. • USG
– Low cost, low risk, non-invasive, acceptable to patient
– Have a range of echogenicity
– Significant arterial blood supply and neovascularization
– Might miss nodules on cirrhotic background & SVII or VIII small lesions
near diaphragm
– Does not provide sufficient anatomic detail for planning surgical
resection or ablation
– No data to support CT/MRI for screening
• AFP
– The result of production by the tumor or regenerating hepatocytes
– Suboptimal as a screening tool, therefore never performed alone
– Only 40-64% sensitive
– Only 20% of early HCC have abnormal AFP
– Fluctuates in flares of hepatitis or exacerbations of liver disease