2. MLN – Molecular breeding
MLN – Two viruses + interaction effect
Transmission by many insect vectors
Seed transmission
Alternative vectors – sugarcane, sorghum?
MCMV interact with other poty viruses too
Therefore genetic control is the more effective
way to control MLN
Understanding the genetic architecture of the
MLN is crucial and here molecular breeding
come into picture
3. Discovery – Discover genomic regions associated with
MLN resistance
Validation – Validate the results
Deployment – Integrate into breeding program
Major genes - MABC
Minor genes / quantitative trait - MARS or GWS
MLN – Molecular breeding
4. Maize Lethal Necrosis - Discovery
Association studies
QTL Mapping
Validation of AM results with QTL Mapping
Genomic prediction
Implementation - MABC
4
8. Genotype
MLND scores (scale 1-5) Seed
color
Breeding Program
Env1 Env2 Env3 Across Env
CLRCY039 1.18 0.92 1.14 1.17 Yellow CIMMYT lowland tropics
CPHYS138 1.02 1.49 1.42 1.32 Yellow CIMMYT Physiology
CLRCY034 1.14 1.62 1.71 1.48 Yellow CIMMYT lowland tropics
CLWN270 1.36 1.80 1.41 1.52 Yellow CIMMYT lowland tropics
CKL05003 1.12 1.58 2.12 1.62 White CIMMYT Kenya
SM-189-75 1.07 1.57 2.26 1.69 Orange KALRO, Kenya
CLWQ251 1.42 2.28 1.60 1.81 White CIMMYT lowland tropics
CML494 1.33 2.30 1.92 1.83 White CIMMYT Gene bank
SM-189-38 1.73 1.88 1.63 1.86 White KALRO, Kenya
CPHYS159 1.97 1.50 2.15 1.86 White CIMMYT Physiology
CLYN261 1.87 1.49 2.19 1.87 Yellow CIMMYT lowland tropics
SM-189-78 1.86 2.75 1.14 1.88 Orange KALRO, Kenya
CLYN231 1.08 2.03 2.48 1.90 Orange CIMMYT lowland tropics
SM-189-69 1.23 1.98 2.59 1.99 Yellow KALRO, Kenya
9. Genome-wide Association mapping
Quality screening of GBS markers
Select the SNPs with MAF of > 0.01
Remove the SNPs with >5% of the missing
Select the lines which has both genotypic and
phenotypic data
For IMAS the final set has 381 lines and 259,476
SNPs
For DTMA the final set has 235 lines and 260,000
SNPs
14. Association mapping - Conclusions
Best 15 significant SNPs explained individually 7 to
10% and together up to 59% of the total genotypic
variance for MLN resistance
MLN is controlled by few major and many minor
genes
The best performing lines can be used as a donors
Validation of significant SNPs is crucial
15. Pop1 – CML444 x CML539,
pop size 184, Locations - 3
Pop2 – CML444 x CML543,
Pop size 203, Locations – 3
Pop3 – LaPostaSeqC7-F71-1-2-1-2-B-B-B-B. x CML543,
Pop size 229, Locations – 3
Pop4 – M37W x CML144 – Pop size -130
Pop5 – J80W x CML144 - Pop size -156
DH Pop – CML494 x CML550 - Pop size -236
Maize Lethal Necrosis – QTL mapping
24. Conclusion
In each Pop and DH – best 3 major QTL are explained ~40-
50% of the total phenotypic variance
Major additive QTL detected on Chr 3 was consistent across
scorings and locations in two populations
The presence of major QTL(s) on chromosome 3 and 6 are
planned to use in MABC to improve the resistance in the
elite lines
25. Prediction of MLN performance based on random
and random with linked SNPs
Inclusion of MLN resistance associated SNPs can
significantly increase the prediction accuracy
26. Future direction for discovery
phase
MLN --- SCMV + MCMV + Interaction
SCMV – Oligogenic – Major genes
MCMV – Oligogenic or polygenic
Interaction effect – Complex and non-genetic
Selecting resistance for individual viruses, either
in same or in different lines, to avoid interaction
effect and able to manage MLN effectively
26