What´S Sovereignty Essays

WhatВґs Sovereignty Essays
Sovereignty
(1)Sovereignty means "supreme and independent power or authority in government as possessed or claimed by a state or community." (Dictonary.com)
First of all, Sovereignty is vital for any country to survive. Singapore's sovereignty is anchored by a cohesive society, economic development and our
military vitality. In addition, Singapore has always placed a prime on its security and its security policy is built on the "twin pillars of deterrence and
diplomacy", a rational affair that its leaders proponent. (Eugene Lim, 2013, para. 3).
Secondly, it is a small country which makes it harder to protect its sovereignty as other countries can easily take over when war occurs, causing threats
of terrorism to be high. Moreover,...show more content...
Trust of the community is important as successful counter–terrorism is dependent on this.
(2)(i) The threat of terrorism from the incident about Mas Selamat has caused a great impact to the nation's sovereignty. This whole incident lasted
from 2002–2009 and it all started when he joined a group called the Jemmaah Islamiyah (JI) which was a Southeast Asian militant terrorist organization.
This incident brought a nation–wide terror to the people in Singapore because Singapore is so safe whereby this kind of situation rarely exists as the
police are competent. Due to the poor security of the government handling the situation, he escaped from detention which makes people curious as he
had to walk with a limp causing difficulty in walking. Moreover, he had plans of bombing Singapore through a few ways such as hijacking a plane
from Bangkok and crashing into Changi Airport. The issue was resolved when Malaysian police caught him in Malaysia and he was later brought back
to Singapore to be held accountable for this incident. To deal with terrorism effectively, the government has ratified an integrated approach to its
national security program, structured around the Prevention, Protection and Response realm. (Mohamed Bin Ali, 2014, p.4)
(ii) Yes, the resolutions of the conflict protect Singapore's sovereignty. After this incident, Singapore's government reputation was tarnished due
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay On State Sovereignty
State Sovereignty has always been a relatively big issue in regards to the power of the country. Since the beginning of this great country, in 1776, state
sovereignty has always been one of the top concerns for the states. When our first government was started, the states had most of the power, within the
Articles of Confederation. In 1789, however, that all changed once the Constitution was written. In the Articles of Confederation, the states had a very
large majority of the power. A law could not be passed unless 9/13 states were for the passing, an amendment could not be passed unless a unanimous
decision was made to pass it. The federal government had no authority to tax, and the only powers they had were to coin money, make treaties,...show
more content...
The commerce clause, is Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: "To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian
tribes;" This clause directly states that the National government has the power to control any and all trade with foreign countries, states, and Indian
tribes. This strengthens their power because before the Constitution, states could trade with whoever they wanted to, now if any state wants to trade
with another state, even their neighboring state, they cannot without the clearance from the national government. Also, mandates have strengthen the
federal government as well. A federal mandate, is a law passed by Congress and signed by the President that require acquiescence by the states. These
laws also override any state law that is opposing to it. An example of this would be the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. This act outlawed and
kind of discrimination towards people with disabilities. This action strengthens the federal government because it gives them the authority to put
special orders into action without any interruption or dispute from the

Sovereignty Essay
Sovereignty
Sovereignty refers to ultimate and absolute authority designated to either an individual or an institutional body.
The term sovereignty could be contested due to the fact that there is no universally agreed definition. Thomas Hobbes defined what he considered the
basis of a political body as 'the most high and perpetual.' (Hobbes, quoted in Heywood, 1997, p26.) This view has proved rather simplistic. It fails to
take into consideration the limitations on the sovereign. Bodin highlighted that although sovereignty provided absolutism, there were restrictions such
as natural laws. (Bodin quoted in Heywood, 1997, p26). Offe supports this by explaining of international restrictions on...show more content...
The contested nature of sovereignty is summarised by David Held, who explains it 'no longer retains the meaning that it had 50 years ago. The concept
is premised upon a bounded territorial state system, increasingly threatened by social and technological change.' (Bealey, Chapman, Sheehan, 1999,
p323).
Sovereignty would be useful to a politics student as it is central to the political process. The concept of sovereignty is interrelated to democracy, a key
feature of Western politics, which in some form is adopted throughout the world. Through understanding where ultimate authority resides in political
institutions, the features and key principles of democracy are analysed. Furthermore, through revising sovereignty, it can be understood how it applies
to non–democratic institutions such as dictatorships or one party political regime. By studying sovereignty, a comparison of the contrasting political
regimes, (democracies and dictatorships) can be undertaken. Sovereignty, in this way is an intrinsic part of the study of politics. The concept of
sovereignty enables a student to explore one of the political controversies of the C21st. On a European level, and to a degree on an international level
it is argued that national states have experience a decrease of sovereignty. This is due to some political powers giving been

Sovereignty In Canada
Despite recent International opportunism, Canada lays claim to the region through historic documents and acts of sovereignty. Canada's claim to the
area began in 1670. When King Charles II of England granted Rupert's land in a charter to the Hudson's Bay Company at the height of the fur trading
era. This charter covered a large area around Hudson's Bay, including the northern expanse above the bay (Rose 4). In 1880, Britain granted the new
dominion of Canada the Arctic Archipelago (Rose 5). Including 94 arctic islands and "all Islands adjacent to any such territories" discovered or not
(Bonikowski). To secure Canadian sovereignty, Canada sent explorers Joseph–ElzГ©ar Bernier and Vilhjalmur Stefansson to leave plaques and flags
on several islands. The symbolic significance of flag raising is questioned, as sovereignty entails taking responsibility for a region through tangible
ways....show more content...
In 1903, Canada setup a North West Mounted Police post on Herschel Island. 1925 marked a vital year for Canadian sovereignty, as the Canadian
government became the first to extend its boundaries northward to the pole. The claim included the sector between 60В° west and 141В° west
longitude, others followed (Haftendorn). Then in 1926, the RCMP operated a post office on Bache Peninsula. In the same year, the establishment of
the Arctic Island Game Preserve sought to protect the natural environment in the region. All four acts are proof of Canadian sovereignty (Bonikowski).
While many may stress the vagueness of historic documents and dismiss acts of sovereignty. The legitimacy of Canada's claim to the Arctic is
supported by historical rights as well as international maritime

Popular Sovereignty
Popular Sovereignty... it means that "We, the People" are the crucial source of government authority. This gives the "sovereign", the People, what they
want by making sure that what the government does to the people's benefit. However, with all this political power residing upon the people, having a
"popular", representing politician, would best ensure the demands and concerns of the people. Thus, the functionality of this system is heavily reliant
on the participation of the people in political matters and responsiveness of the representative. So when someone asks what does the government
actually do for the citizens...? There is actually a lot. Their duties can be categorized into 10 ideals: protecting our freedoms, giving away the land,
...show more content...
The people would have to actively participate and give in their input in order for these modifications to happen. These are some of the ways that the
government reflects upon what the people want, hence how the Bill of Rights were given to us. However, without the involvement of the people,
these changes would be difficult to be proposed and put into play. The contribution and the input of the citizen are accessible to those who choose to
vote. Therefore, giving everyone (that satisfies the age and citizenship requirement) the opportunity to have in says in public political matters and
issues that they want to be involved in. The power is by choice and passed onto the elected representative to exemplify the people's issue to the
hierarchy. Nevertheless, it is important that when electing a political leader, they must meet the criteria of what a good leader entails. The leader
must be able to make sacrifices and put in place realistic development measures to improve living conditions and concerns. The people are not able to
move forward as a nation unless there is a deliberate and concerted effort on the part of the

Essay about Native Sovereignty
July 11th 1990, marked the beginning date of the Oka Crisis in Quebec Canada. It lasted until September 26th 1990 resulting in one fatality of a local
police officer. The violent clash was triggered by something as simple as a golf course extension and as complicated as native burial traditions. It had
drawn world attention, catapulting native land rights into the mix. The Oka Crisis is just one of many conflicts between the Aboriginals and the
Canadian government. A major issue that has been of much debate in the 20th century has been Native sovereignty. The demand sounds simple, allow
Aboriginals of Canada to govern themselves; however, coexisting with the Canadian government makes this idea extremely complicated. Roger
Townshend states...show more content...
Townshend describes how Aboriginals view the Canadian government as a foreign government. Furthermore, Townshend disputes the process of
assimilation, integrating Aboriginals to the modern Canadian society. The solution is to create a third tier government that would work in cohesion
with the Federal and Provincial levels. Different levels of government and the "...sharing of jurisdictional powers between government institutions is
already part of the essence of the Canadian state," (Townshend 39). If Canada is able to increase globalization and trade agreements on an international
level, than Canada should not be so unwilling to share jurisdiction with an Aboriginal government.
Thomas Flanagan disapproves the idea of Native sovereignty ever coexisting with Canadian sovereignty. Flanagan identifies the flaws in Townshend's
arguments referring to them as a theoretical approach and not a practical approach. It is true that the sharing of jurisdictional power is the essence of
the Canadian state but this cannot apply to the Aboriginals of Canada. One reason a third level of government cannot work in Canada is "In the 10
provinces, Canada has over six hundred Indian bands living on more than 2200 reserves, plus hundreds of thousands of MГ©tis and non–status Indians
who do not possess reserves," (Flanagan 44). Flanagan draws the fact that "No one has proposed a workable mechanism by which this far–flung
archipelago could

Popular Sovereignty Essay
The United States is classifies as a Democracy, what classifies as a democracy is many things. Included in Democracy is Popular Sovereignty, which
defines as the principle that the authority of a state and its government is created and sustained by the consent of its people, through their elected
representatives (Wikipedia, 2016). Incorporated of Popular Sovereignty is Represented Democracy, elections are free and fair, the people participate in
the political process, high quality information is available, and more. What stands out as this upcoming election is the people participate in the
political process. Over the years, voter turnout has been all over the place. It is our rights as people to vote, this is Suffrage. Many citizens fail on...show
more content...
Adults, Six Vote and Four Don't. What Separates Them?",digs in to understand the demographics of voter turnout. Though it is a fact that Hispanics
and lower classes don't vote as much, however there are many demographics that don't vote overall. This article comes to the conclusion that
individuals are motivation for different things, and their overall opinion is that the richer, older, and more educated the citizen is, the more likely they
are to vote. In the 2012 election, many white people did vote to the ones that did not vote. However, once we start getting down to the African
Americans, Hispanic, and Asian, the voting seems to even out, for the voters and non–voters. Since African Americans vote so much, with the
significantly smaller population than whites, they are more likely to vote 1.5 times more than whites. African Americans started to vote, in the 1990s
when Barack Obama and Jesse Jackson urged more African Americans to vote. They also became true of their race, when 90 percent of them voted
for Barack Obama. When it comes to income, the less you make, the less you vote. Hispanics as voters are trickier than the other races. Obstacles
prevent, and also make it challenging to

What´S Sovereignty Essays

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

What´S Sovereignty Essays