Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences
Similar to OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences (20)
More from AlleneMcclendon878
More from AlleneMcclendon878 (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences
- 1. OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences …! Immersive Reader Total Points: 50 Week 4 Sociologic Sciences Journal Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submi!ng a text entry box or a file upload NURS_500_DE - Case Study Rubric Criteria Ra"ngs Pts 20 pts 20 pts 7.5 pts 2.5 pts Start Assignment Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study following the readings and presenta!on for this week. Associate what you have learned about the theories to this case study, and then see the instruc!ons below to complete a journal entry about your experience. During weeks 2 & 4, you will complete interac!ve case studies
- 2. and be asked to associate what you have learned about theory in comparison to the case study and reflect on it. Each !me you have completed a case study, submit your reflec!on. Each reflec!on should include the following: A comparison of what you have learned from the case study to related theories you have studied. Make sure to cite these theories in APA format. A comparison of the case study to your nursing prac!ce, giving one or two examples from your nursing experience in which you might have applied a par!cular theory covered. Your reflec!on should be a minimum of five to six paragraphs. Cri!cal Analysis 20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expecta"ons Presents an exemplary ar!cula!on and insigh"ul analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all ques!ons. Makes keen observa!ons, making note of essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and crea!ve; they are supported by scien!fic evidence that is credible and !mely. Draws insigh"ul and comprehensive
- 3. conclusions and solu!ons. 16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expecta"ons Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most ques!ons. Makes occasional note of essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scien!fic evidence that is credible and !mely. Makes some a$empt to draw conclusions and solu!ons. 15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons Provides insufficient explana!ons of significant concepts. Offers li$le or insignificant detail and no examples for most ques!ons. Fails to address essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are
- 4. generally unsupported by scien!fic evidence, but some a$empt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion. 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explana!ons. Informa!on is not scien!fically sound. Content 20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expecta"ons Makes insigh"ul, clear and accurate connec!ons to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expecta"ons
- 5. Makes mostly accurate connec!ons to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explana!ons, although a$empts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons Informa!on is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates li$le or no understanding of the concepts
- 6. presented in the case. Mechanics 7.5 to >6.15 pts Meets Expecta"ons Answers are well wri$en throughout. Informa!on is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and gramma!cal errors. 6.15 to >5.63 pts Approaches Expecta"ons Answers are well wri$en throughout and the informa!on is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and gramma!cal errors. 5.63 to >4.43 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and gramma!cal
- 7. errors. 4.43 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons Answers are not well wri$en and lack clarity. Informa!on is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and gramma!cal errors. APA Format 2.5 to >2.05 pts Meets Expecta"ons Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source cita!ons, and layout. 2.05 to >1.88 pts Approaches Expecta"ons Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source cita!ons, and layout. 1.88 to >1.48 pts
- 8. Falls Below Expecta"ons Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source cita!ons, and layout. 1.48 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons Does not follow format, length, source cita!ons, and layout requirements. "Previous Next# WCU_202209FAIOL Home Announcements Syllabus VitalSource E-Text Modules Assignments Discussions
- 9. Grades My Panopto Videos Zoom Tutor.com Course Evalua!ons WCU Library Remind Chat with Gabby Account Dashboard Courses Calendar Inbox History Studio Help https://webapps.srm- app.net/CanvasContent/SF/WCU_NURS_500_DE_TEMPLATE/ Case_Studies/W4%20- %20Sociologic%20Sciences%20Interactive%20Case%20Study/
- 11. Week 4 Sociologic Sciences Journal Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submi!ng a text entry box or a file upload NURS_500_DE - Case Study Rubric Criteria Ra"ngs Pts 20 pts 20 pts 7.5 pts 2.5 pts Start Assignment Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study following the readings and presenta!on for this week. Associate what you have learned about the theories to this case study, and then see the instruc!ons below to complete a journal entry about your experience. During weeks 2 & 4, you will complete interac!ve case studies and be asked to associate what you have learned about theory in comparison to the case study and reflect on it. Each !me you have completed a case study, submit your reflec!on. Each reflec!on should include the following: A comparison of what you have learned from the case study to related theories you have studied. Make sure to
- 12. cite these theories in APA format. A comparison of the case study to your nursing prac!ce, giving one or two examples from your nursing experience in which you might have applied a par!cular theory covered. Your reflec!on should be a minimum of five to six paragraphs. Cri!cal Analysis 20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expecta"ons Presents an exemplary ar!cula!on and insigh"ul analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all ques!ons. Makes keen observa!ons, making note of essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and crea!ve; they are supported by scien!fic evidence that is credible and !mely. Draws insigh"ul and comprehensive conclusions and solu!ons. 16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expecta"ons Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories
- 13. presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most ques!ons. Makes occasional note of essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scien!fic evidence that is credible and !mely. Makes some a$empt to draw conclusions and solu!ons. 15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons Provides insufficient explana!ons of significant concepts. Offers li$le or insignificant detail and no examples for most ques!ons. Fails to address essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are generally unsupported by scien!fic evidence, but some a$empt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion. 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not
- 14. Meet Expecta"ons Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explana!ons. Informa!on is not scien!fically sound. Content 20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expecta"ons Makes insigh"ul, clear and accurate connec!ons to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expecta"ons Makes mostly accurate connec!ons to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the
- 15. concepts presented in the case. 15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explana!ons, although a$empts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons Informa!on is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates li$le or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case. Mechanics 7.5 to >6.15 pts Meets Expecta"ons Answers are well wri$en throughout. Informa!on
- 16. is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and gramma!cal errors. 6.15 to >5.63 pts Approaches Expecta"ons Answers are well wri$en throughout and the informa!on is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and gramma!cal errors. 5.63 to >4.43 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and gramma!cal errors. 4.43 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons Answers are not well wri$en and lack clarity.
- 17. Informa!on is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and gramma!cal errors. APA Format 2.5 to >2.05 pts Meets Expecta"ons Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source cita!ons, and layout. 2.05 to >1.88 pts Approaches Expecta"ons Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source cita!ons, and layout. 1.88 to >1.48 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source cita!ons, and layout.
- 18. 1.48 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons Does not follow format, length, source cita!ons, and layout requirements. "Previous Next# WCU_202209FAIOL Home Announcements Syllabus VitalSource E-Text Modules Assignments Discussions Grades My Panopto Videos Zoom Tutor.com
- 19. Course Evalua!ons WCU Library Remind Chat with Gabby Account Dashboard Courses Calendar Inbox History Studio Help https://webapps.srm- app.net/CanvasContent/SF/WCU_NURS_500_DE_TEMPLATE/ Case_Studies/W4%20- %20Sociologic%20Sciences%20Interactive%20Case%20Study/ wcu_nurs_500_sociologic_sciences_interactive_case_study.html https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/21901 https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/21901/announce ments https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/21901/external_t ools/72?display=borderless https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/21901/external_t ools/81